Black Powder vs. Triple Seven

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 249

  • @GunsOfTheWest
    @GunsOfTheWest  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Check out the Guns of the West store here: gunsoftheweststore.com

  • @th3hunt3r11
    @th3hunt3r11 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Glad I found this video. Have Just started using black powder and have a great deal to learn! Hope I find MORE of you video's.

  • @TonyFreeman-LocoTonyF
    @TonyFreeman-LocoTonyF 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I think you should have compared the 15% reduced Triple Seven, as that is recommended to duplicate black powder pressures, against the full 20 grain black powder load. Great video! 👍

  • @zacharyrollick6169
    @zacharyrollick6169 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Just picked up a pound of T7 today. Good info.

    • @erlycuyler
      @erlycuyler 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Where did you get it?

  • @joshuariddensdale2126
    @joshuariddensdale2126 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I use 20 grains of Triple 7 in both my 1851 Navy and 1860 Army. Both are in 44 cal. For my Colt Walker, which has a much larger capacity, I use 50 grains of the same powder.

    • @blueduck9409
      @blueduck9409 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well? How does that work out for you? Power? Accuracy? Velocity?

  • @zachjones6944
    @zachjones6944 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for pointing out the differences in pressure between both compounds. I would love to do this as a college chemistry experiment.

  • @JJW3
    @JJW3 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I like 777. I use a 50gr. by volume charge of FFg in my reproduction 1861 Springfield. Shooting a .575 Minie ball is nice and pleasant and it cleans up easily. I have never had ignition issues with 777 using musket caps.

  • @ArizonaGhostriders
    @ArizonaGhostriders 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Wow, I don't remember when we used it in our shows being as smokey as BP. They must have improved it. Something to consider for the future. Thanks, Dustin! Neat chronograph, too.

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thanks, Santee! The chronograph is way too much fun! It makes me paranoid though that I’m gonna shoot it. LOL!

  • @chrisjones469
    @chrisjones469 5 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    I can appreciate the fair comparison between powders in this video. However, I haven’t really found any videos that demonstrate the true ballistic capabilities of these arms when loaded with max loads of triple 7. I have shot hundreds of these loads through my Pietta 1858 Remington without issue, usually generating around 500 ft-lbs of energy. I typically use 40 grains under a 200 grain Lee conical, or 42 grains under a .454 lead ball. I use these loadings as a backup when hog hunting with my Hawken style muzzleloader. The 15% reduction recommended by Hodgdon is intended to duplicate a certain familiar blackpowder load for accuracy and predictability, not for safety. Triple 7 will not rupture a cylinder on these style revolvers at any loading, provided the barrel is unobstructed. There is a caveat that brass frame revolvers will show stretching and wear with these loads at the frame. These loads begin to approach the .357 magnum in terms of energy. Some accuracy will generally be sacrificed at this loading, but for some purposes, the stopping power is preferred over the extra precision, particularly when intended for use at relatively short ranges in a defensive scenario.

    • @denisdegamon8224
      @denisdegamon8224 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Sir 40 grains in your 58 Remington is an over load, even if uou were using BP instead of triple 7. That load would be on the high end fir a Ruger Old Army.

    • @aksel487
      @aksel487 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why the fuck would you use a unreliable blackpowder gun when your life is on the line, pack a 44 mag

    • @christopherrowley7506
      @christopherrowley7506 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@aksel487 could be it's your only legal choice.

    • @82c10
      @82c10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I use 22 grains of T7 normally and sometimes up to 27 grains in my .36 navy. Never had an issue. These revolvers are at minimum 3x stronger than what they originally were, when they were made from wrought iron. Steel is more fracture resistant than iron, and with a much stronger tensile strength. It would be hard to explode one of these cylinders using black powder or t7. Wrought iron has a tensile strength of roughly 7,500-10,000. Steel has a MINIMUM tensile strength of 30,000. With most steel being of 50,000 psi tensile strength. Just another old wives tale. Oh and as for the Ruger old army. They would test those with smokeless before they left the factory and were made from the same steel as the Ruger security six. So sorry, but you are misinformed.

    • @timemeddlertardis5343
      @timemeddlertardis5343 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@82c10 that's not how firearms work. the strength comes mostly from design, not the materials, there's a reason the blackhawk can be loaded way hotter than a colt clone, and it isn't different material.

  • @AngeredKabar
    @AngeredKabar 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I'm new to black powder.
    The only powder I managed to get my hands on is Triple Seven. I shot 10 full cylinders with no issues yesterday and all the fouling wiped off with some damp patches, very easy to clean.
    I'm still on the lookout for actual black powder so I don't deprive myself of the full experience :)

    • @Mikegastaldo
      @Mikegastaldo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Powder valley .com sells goex fffg the downside is they charge 30 bucks for hazmat fee PLUS 5bucks for a signature required fee.so 35 bucks to send it to you...myself I'm a sort of a purist I only use goex fffg in my pistols with Remington caps.thats it that's all. 30 grains Everytime...good luck to you hope your new hobby brings you joy

    • @dtnetlurker
      @dtnetlurker 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Mikegastaldo Your not the only one. I have tried a few substitutes. They were all ok, and the closest to real Black Powder in my personal opinion is Pyrodex, but I decided to finally go ahead and lay down the money for the REAL DEAL. I just couldn't continue using a substitute when one American Black Powder factory is still in operation and could use my support. I decided it was worth the cost, and am more than happy. Worth every single penny to get the exact same smell and experience that they got so long ago, back in the civil war era and even before. If you want to get the exact same historical experience you simply have to get THE original Gun Powder. GOEX Black Powder is the one and only way I shoot now. My other cans of substitutes are just stored away as extra.

    • @Mikegastaldo
      @Mikegastaldo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@dtnetlurker I previously responded that powder valley was a resource to buy black powder and it is..BUT I discovered a company by the name of MIDWAY USA that has much better price on it.much better..and they also sell goex fffg old eynsford match grade black powder.that shoots real .real nice.hope this helps.enjoy your hobby all the best

    • @dtnetlurker
      @dtnetlurker 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Mikegastaldo Yeah Midway does sell it. I have used their site before. They sell out extremely quick though and can take a long while to restock it.

    • @markworden9169
      @markworden9169 ปีที่แล้ว

      The velocity increase was 29% at least I can find triple 7 around here.

  • @buffalobearbp7095
    @buffalobearbp7095 6 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Great Vid Dustin. Although next time you might want to use a BBQ stick lighter to set off the powder, you don't shave your hands that way LOL. Thank you, and good shooting.

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      LOL! Thanks for watching!

    • @Jak-it
      @Jak-it 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Was unloading my 18-49 pocket revolver and dumping the loose powder into an old Altoids can all together after dumping all five Chambers I had roughly a hundred grains of pyrodex in the Altoids can, later onI was smoking a cigarette and completely forgot about the Altoids can with the powder in it had to leave really quick so I slammed the cigarette butt into the can to put it out quickly and it flashed up so quickly gave me 2nd degree burns all over the tops of my fingers. Lesson learned dump old powder from cylinders into water

  • @michaelwest1854
    @michaelwest1854 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great comparison thank you for showing this I appreciate it very much!

  • @Honest_Grifter
    @Honest_Grifter 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great content, I love the chrono spreadsheet... thanks for all the great content

  • @MajorMustang1117
    @MajorMustang1117 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Glad I saw this. I have my 1851 coming in the mail right now and was going to use 25 grain for my brass frame. Definitely will drop it to 20 for this. Dont want that frame warped. 😆👍

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thanks for watching!

    • @MajorMustang1117
      @MajorMustang1117 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@GunsOfTheWest thanks for posting content for newbies like me!

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You bet!

  • @sahmadi1000
    @sahmadi1000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for doing all of these things. You are saving us a lot of time trying to find out on our own. Seeing is beleiving. THANKS

  • @BogeyTheBear
    @BogeyTheBear 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    To simplify the head math, reducing the charge by 15% works like this: Take the normal amount of black powder you use in a charge and move the decimal point over to the left.
    For example-- if you are using 30 grains of black powder, move the decimal point and you get 3.0 grains. That is 10%, so half that amount again (1.5 grains) and add it to the mental total (3.0 + 1.5 = 4.5) to reduce the charge by that amount, 4.5 grains.
    17 grains of black powder: 1.7 + 0.8 = 2.5 (so reduce the charge by 2.5 grains or just fudge it to 15 grains instead)

    • @prophy4736
      @prophy4736 ปีที่แล้ว

      wow we live in an age where basic math must be explained lol. man oh man sigh

  • @mrweeby1961
    @mrweeby1961 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was just reviewing these powders for loading information but the two I have are Pyrodex and Triple 7. I have a label on my Triple 7 to reduce the charge by 15% too and since BP and Pyrodex use the same charge I think I'm safe all around.

  • @johnchambers2996
    @johnchambers2996 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Of note is that Triple Seven, unlike Pyrodex or black powder, is incompressible so you can't force a ball down on a slight overload.

  • @tomshort2096
    @tomshort2096 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good to know there's so much difference

  • @JoanieKennedy
    @JoanieKennedy 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Excellent video ....iv been using 777 for years for revolver n pistol hunting I don't recommend this but I'm my ruger old army i load a full 40 gr charge and 220 gr conical it spits it out right around 1300 fps which power wise puts it into .41 mag range with a tko factor approaching .44 mag. Or 50 gr with .457 round ball it spanks the 158 gr .357 mag booty. In my plains pistol 40 gr of 777 3f and a patched 230 gr round ball I got 1200 fps putting par on energy and tko wise with a Winchester 240 gr .44 mag. In my plains rifle i spit out a 530 gr mini ball with 60 gr of 2f at 1460 fps which approaches the .577 snider round. With 80 gr the recoil was no longer fun and it spit same mini ball out at 1622 fps I think that load would take anything that stood before it but not fun to shoot...again I was hot loading with 777 I do not recommend this I have good ol Elmeir Keith spirit watching over me 😁

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nice!!

    • @poncholefty471
      @poncholefty471 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I do the same with my cap and ball revolvers! 35grains of 777 and a 255 grain conical. Around 1000ft/s and hits with 740ft/lbs! I modified a frontier mold to produce my projectiles. Love your channel ROAG! Elmer would be proud!!!

    • @JoanieKennedy
      @JoanieKennedy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@poncholefty471 Thank you. Happy Halloween. 🧡🖤🧡

    • @poncholefty471
      @poncholefty471 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JoanieKennedy you as well!

  • @joep4235
    @joep4235 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thanks so much Dustin.... really great vid this morning....

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      You’re welcome! Thanks for being such a frequent viewer of my channel!

  • @notsosilentmajority1
    @notsosilentmajority1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'm new to BP and find your videos very helpful and informative. In this video it looked like the T7 barrel was more fouled than the BP. I originally was only interested in BP rifles but after seeing some of your videos I am definitely interested in BP handguns as well. Thanks very much.

    • @RockandrollNegro
      @RockandrollNegro 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You could always start with a BP revolving carbine (if you can find one.) Or, a Wyatt Earp or Buffalo long barrel .44 fitted with a buttstock. I got my brother into BP handguns like that; originally he was only interested in BP rifles.

    • @notsosilentmajority1
      @notsosilentmajority1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RockandrollNegro
      Thanks very much for the input, I really appreciate it. I bought a Hawken 50 cal rifle and a 1858 Remington revolver BUT I haven't shot either one yet, lol. I just got them and I'm itching to try them out. I am already interested in a carbine. I own a Circuit Judge rifle in 45lc/410 and it reminds me of the BP carbines in design a little bit. Happy holidays and best wishes.

    • @blueduck9409
      @blueduck9409 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Some of those black powder pistols and rifles are capable of outstanding accuracy, and depending on what type of bullet you use, can produce outstanding power compared to smokeless modern arms and ammo.

    • @notsosilentmajority1
      @notsosilentmajority1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@blueduck9409
      Yes, I see that. They really are amazing. Thanks.

  • @natekoch3057
    @natekoch3057 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Please clarify, that if you want to replicate the FPS and velocity of a black powder load, you should reduce by 10 to 15%. As for actual loading, I have yet to find anywhere that actually says you should reduce all loads by this amount, in fact if you read the loading instructions on that can of 777 you have, it will tell you to load grain for grain (by volume) the same as black powder. One of the benefits of 777 is increased charges from the same amount of powder. If you can provide an actual statement from Hodgdon saying to reduce the loads I would love to see it.

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I may not have been clear about that. The 15% reduction is to match the performance of black powder. Otherwise, Triple Seven can be used in higher volumes, but research should be done to know the limitations of each firearm when doing that. Thanks for watching!

  • @Lleesstreett
    @Lleesstreett ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I got into black powder shooting last year i didn’t know that triple 7 was a magnum load so to speak. So I ended up shooting about 200 rounds loaded with 30 grains of it. I can imagine the pressure and stress on my colt revolver was extreme however the frame isn’t stretched.

    • @humansvd3269
      @humansvd3269 ปีที่แล้ว

      Brass frame? What revolver did you use?

    • @Lleesstreett
      @Lleesstreett ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@humansvd3269 steel frame

  • @shrugger1
    @shrugger1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Yep, I had no idea there was that much of a difference either.

  • @schinderiapraemeturus6239
    @schinderiapraemeturus6239 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    777 generates more pressure than BP due to it's higher ratio of gas versus solids when fired, being perchlorate/ascorbic acid based. I too found 777 and Pyrodex loads won't always ignite using standard primers. A solution is to prime the chamber first with 3-4 grains of good PB (Goex), then load your substitute powder over it. I wouldn't do this in a Colt 1860, but an 1851 Rem or ROA will be fine

  • @budman1181
    @budman1181 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Appreciate you taking the time with that
    Very nice with a data

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My pleasure! Thanks for watching!

  • @jimsmirh2406
    @jimsmirh2406 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I didn't know there was that much power difference between those two. I may have to buy myself a pound of it and try my luck at it.

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I had heard there was a difference, but I didn’t know it would be that much either. Thanks for watching!

  • @billwessels207
    @billwessels207 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great job, well done sir. I have used both since about 1970 and always wished I had the numbers you just produced. I have noted that it takes a hooter cap to reliably ignite the BP substitutes. Many recommend Remington caps for this reason. However it is becoming difficult to find them.

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for watching! Is there a Sportsman’s Warehouse near you? That’s where I usually buy my Remington caps.

    • @billwessels207
      @billwessels207 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, I live in Avon Park, Florida.

  • @user-oz1fd1hz9d
    @user-oz1fd1hz9d 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Very useful video. I've found pretty much the same difference between using Swiss real BP and Goex or Schuetzen.

  • @mrsteel250
    @mrsteel250 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I’ve heard people say there is more variation in triple 7 velocities depending on how much you compress it whereas it isn’t as much of a deal with pyrodex and black powder, is there a way you could do a video testing this?
    Thanks!

    • @henryofskalitz2228
      @henryofskalitz2228 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      it very little variation from what i tested in my walker with a 50g vs 40g charge

  • @kbjerke
    @kbjerke 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice range backstop!! Isn't that where Kirk battled the Gorn? LOL Thanks for the video!

  • @wyattheavin7495
    @wyattheavin7495 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you for this video, I've been wondering how much of a difference these powders had

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      You’re welcome! Thanks for watching!

  • @Trumplican
    @Trumplican 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i dont believe it ive never seen a substitute more powerful than black powder

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Triple Seven and Pyrodex are both more powerful than black powder.

    • @Trumplican
      @Trumplican 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GunsOfTheWest that's funny. I shot black powder rifles for decades and for example shooting 50 cal i had to use 100 grains of pyrodex to get the same results as 75 grains of olde eynsford. never used triple 7.

  • @kenm8376
    @kenm8376 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Always very informative.

  • @sociadeanonymia3081
    @sociadeanonymia3081 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    its says to use a 15% reduction to reproduce the same amount of black powder , but in my testing its only goex that you need to do this with because swiss is stronger than 777

  • @RobertBlevins
    @RobertBlevins 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Dustin: I use 20 grains of Triple Seven in my 1851 Navy, 36 caliber. Do you think that is too much?

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If the gun has a steel frame, you’re probably ok. If the frame is brass, I would use less.

  • @don.richard8823
    @don.richard8823 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great review! 👍🇺🇸

  • @russelmcfarland9521
    @russelmcfarland9521 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I load 35 grain of 777 with ox yoke wad and a .454 hornady round ball in my 1860 army.

  • @charlescomly1
    @charlescomly1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You said that 15 grains of BP was a light load for the 51 navy, using the same T7 15g load I would like to see how a regular load of BP would compare on the croon graph.

    • @denisdegamon8224
      @denisdegamon8224 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      20 grains of 3Fg would be about the same as the videos triple 7.

  • @chriskell8479
    @chriskell8479 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thank you. Very informative.

  • @Strutingeagle
    @Strutingeagle 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just so you know, burn rates in open air does not give indication of performance of powder confined. An example would be compare smokeless shotgun powder burning in open air to black powder. A person may tend to believe black powder is faster based on this test but we know otherwise.

  • @DMX-PAT
    @DMX-PAT 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Might I suggest a match by which you hold over the powder and then drop while pulling your hand back quickly... great video!!

  • @ritascott3767
    @ritascott3767 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video!

  • @samspencer582
    @samspencer582 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for another great video. How is Triple 7 compared to Pyrodex? Which is better, or are they kind of same substitutes? I really want real black powder, but in Sweden it´s easier to get Pyrodex, at least now from a shop that has it and still sells it without any license. I know I am too late on this video, but wanted to ask anyhow. Keep up the good work you do.

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They both work fine, but Triple Seven is more powerful. Thanks for watching!

    • @samspencer582
      @samspencer582 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GunsOfTheWest Thank you for your fast answer. I wish you a great weekend.

  • @GunDrone
    @GunDrone 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Triple Seven is way more powerful, good video.

  • @blueduck9409
    @blueduck9409 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well, that covers velocity. I wonder if there is any accuracy difference? And, how about full powder charges of 777 compared to reduced loads? Some pistols, like the one made by ruger, can safely handle the full 777 load.

  • @tranders365
    @tranders365 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for another interesting video.

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      You bet! Thanks for watching!

  • @badgerrrlattin35
    @badgerrrlattin35 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Might have been good to mention that 777 may be harder to ignite. I know my own experience with my .54 rifle, this difference is quite pronounced.

    • @Baurakale777
      @Baurakale777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I sometimes have half a second of failure to fire when using standard caps with 777. When using standard caps with 777, the nipple tends to plug up after 10ish rounds.

  • @christopherbennett4559
    @christopherbennett4559 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is a great video. Thanks for sharing God bless.

  • @deividweiss
    @deividweiss 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This really help me, im used to shot goex fffg but I can find it anywhere and I was desperate looking for another option and now I know i can get 777 and will be the same result

  • @humansvd3269
    @humansvd3269 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where did you get your hat? Looking for some civil war/western hat wear.

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      J.W. Hats in Salt Lake City, Utah.

  • @davidbrock4104
    @davidbrock4104 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another great video. Getting back into muzzleloaders so this is a big help

  • @SA-lr1sf
    @SA-lr1sf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for taking time to do this. It helped me very much. Does Tripple 7 smokes like black powder?

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s still pretty smokey.

  • @WORRO
    @WORRO 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good video, thanks for the info! Thumbs up!~John

  • @wraith67
    @wraith67 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I haven't had any issues with 30gr of 777 in a Pietta 1860, 1858 behind 200 gr. Lee conicals.

  • @DMEII
    @DMEII 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The 777 seems to burn a tad slower than the pyrodex did in your other video. I wonder if that makes the velocity better. I might have to go to 777. I heard Pioneer is better in that it creates its own lube so to speak from its own fouling. Is that true?

  • @shannonludwick5738
    @shannonludwick5738 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome amazing what triple seven does

  • @TUCOtheratt
    @TUCOtheratt ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! I've never found triple seven locally so I've never tried it but I have tried pyrodex and found the clean up to be extremely gummy compared to real BP. You said the clean up was comparable, was the triple seven gummy like pyrodex?

    • @PW.6060
      @PW.6060 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I've always used 777 and never found it to be gummy upon cleanup. It's not that bad to clean.

  • @guardianminifarm8005
    @guardianminifarm8005 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Super. Thanks

  • @enricoesposito9273
    @enricoesposito9273 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing review. I own a derringer 54 cal muzzleloader, 4 inch barrel. would you recommend this kind of powder for every muzzleloaded weapon? Cheers.

  • @snappers_antique_firearms
    @snappers_antique_firearms 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey Dustin have you ever considered making your own blackpowder?

  • @VTPSTTU
    @VTPSTTU 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    At this point, I shoot Pyrodex because that's what I have available. I haven't had a problem cleaning.

  • @jeremygunslinger1948
    @jeremygunslinger1948 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Alsome video. Might have to get some triple 7 now

  • @jackfrost3560
    @jackfrost3560 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great comparison. In my area BP is almost impossible to get but 7 is easy sometimes to get I have been using the 7 & pyro it's ok lots of people making their own powder now but only the true die hardest of them and make lube from 🐝 Wax and lamb fat work's good little more than I am interested in but like I said their diehard BP guys. Have fun I will show this to them see what they say.

    • @franck66570
      @franck66570 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bonjour du sud de la France... Comment se fait-il qu'au usa la poudre noire soit si difficile à trouver ? Bonne journee

    • @jackfrost3560
      @jackfrost3560 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi
      The company that makes black powder went out of business. And the swiss powder has been reclassified so in some states not allowed to buy or sell it so just make it your self if you want or get the substitute. I'll just make it nothing hard. Just make small quantities so you don't get throw into another state. :)

  • @Ford360CID
    @Ford360CID 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    is triple 7 FFg recommended for the Remington navy 36 caliber or would a FFFG better suited for short barrelled revolvers?

    • @victorboucher675
      @victorboucher675 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      smaller bore = smaller grains = faster burn

  • @Baurakale777
    @Baurakale777 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you. Do you use regular caps with 777 or magnum caps? The nipple clogs on mine when I tried using regular caps with 777.

  • @ralphperez4862
    @ralphperez4862 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you, thank you thank you my friend. Amazing results. I'm curious, Is Shokey Gold the same as Triple 7? P.S. Congrats on the Chrony. Mine is nearly 30 years old and has the scares to prove it.

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You’re welcome, my friend! Thanks for watching!
      I don’t have any experience with that powder, but I’ll gladly do a video on it if I find some.

    • @ralphperez4862
      @ralphperez4862 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Gracias!

    • @davidvance2108
      @davidvance2108 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ê

  • @kerrypurcell6022
    @kerrypurcell6022 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great video,,,,,,helped me a lot,,

  • @MarcosCaminante
    @MarcosCaminante 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. Two questions.
    1) Does black powder lube have to be used with 777?
    2) Can powder coated or Hitek coated bullets be used with 777? Thx

  • @blackpowderfirearmenthusia3194
    @blackpowderfirearmenthusia3194 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      You bet! Thanks for watching!

  • @Flederratte
    @Flederratte 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video. It would be perfect if you would add conversion to metric units for the rest of the world!

  • @hazratmuhazmat8831
    @hazratmuhazmat8831 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does 777 have to be compressed to be safe? I am interested in loading cartridges for .45 LC and want to know if I need a wad on top or not.
    Also, is 777 corrosive like BP? How long can I go after shooting before cleanup?

    • @blueduck9409
      @blueduck9409 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is NOT recommended to use 777 in brass cartridges like tye .45 colt. The wad will eliminate, or grately reduce barrel leading. Yes, 777 is hydroscopic, like all black powders, and you would be wise to clean any firearm that has been fired with any kind of black powder, including 777. For black powder cartridges, you can use Goex,or regular Pyrodex safely, and they must be compressed. Use lots of bullet lube when making those cartridges. Bore butter, or Dustin's bullet lube works great.

  • @michaelcote1942
    @michaelcote1942 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great Job.

  • @erlycuyler
    @erlycuyler 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've watched this vid a few times. Been looking for it,but can't find it.

  • @dtnetlurker
    @dtnetlurker 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have tried substitutes, liked them especially Pyrodex but once I decided to pay up for several pounds of the REAL thing. I quickly stored those away as extra. Only the real 100% authentic and original gun powder for me now. There is not a single substitute made that duplicates it. To get the real experience you have to get the real thing.
    That smell you get . . . that's what history smells like.

    • @timstrauss9363
      @timstrauss9363 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Like a great politician BP vs substitute. See clean vs dirty Same 🤣😂🤣

  • @charlesc.plumley9755
    @charlesc.plumley9755 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How much would you reduce the 777 charge in comparison to the BP charge?
    Thanks

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hodgdon says to use 15% less 777 than you would black powder.

  • @mannys9130
    @mannys9130 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ok, so I know that real black powder fouling and residue is corrosive and one should clean their firearm right after shooting or else the metal will rust. Is that the case with Triple 7? I generally don't clean my guns thoroughly after each range trip, only after a few hundred rounds (whether it takes me one session or 5). If I fired my guns with Triple 7 and put them away for a month, would I find a pitted bore and ruined bluing?

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Like black powder, Triple Seven should be cleaned after each use. I’ve let them go a few days, but even that can cause some surface rust. When it comes to cleaning, I recommend treating this the same as black powder. Thanks for watching!

    • @mannys9130
      @mannys9130 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GunsOfTheWest Excellent. Thank you Dustin.

  • @Glrk10
    @Glrk10 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi. I have seen black powder substitutes that require shotgun primers to ignite and are meant to be used in modern in-line muzzleloaders. Have you ever tried one of those powders? Do they really require a shotgun primer?

  • @sogdal1
    @sogdal1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very interesting!

  • @charlesc.plumley9755
    @charlesc.plumley9755 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have u done a comparison between the 777 and Pyrodex?

  • @jamescraig8601
    @jamescraig8601 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi , I have a question, I can't find the answer to. Can I use triple 7 ffg in my Remington New army?

  • @randomstupiddude3565
    @randomstupiddude3565 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now I know this is interesting question but If I may ask something. So Triple7 is a lot more powerful than Pyro and real BP ...
    1. If in some small guns like Colt police 1862 or Navy's using Conical ball and then the max charges will be reduced ...can we fill it with Triple7 to substitute that loss (like...with ball 20 grain max and it reduced to 17 with conical can we fill 17 grains with Triple7 and be safe?)
    2. In some small guns like Colt 1849 or pocket Rem. how to shoot it with more power but not actually blasting myself up? do I use Triple7 in them?

  • @Freeflorida123
    @Freeflorida123 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome!! Thank you!!
    How about FFG 777 vs FFFG 777
    I used FFG 777 with good results.

  • @Reset_Robot
    @Reset_Robot 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing Video.. That will help me alot ! Thx :-)

  • @easternmikeoutdoors
    @easternmikeoutdoors 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What's the sense in reducing the charge if it just works better?

  • @hook86
    @hook86 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    God it sucks that Black MZ is once again out of production. Has me searching for another substitute when I was totally happy with Black MZ. I'll use either 777 or American Pioneer Powder I guess....

    • @rogerlinscott3224
      @rogerlinscott3224 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jim Shockley's Gold (also Alliant brand I think) is very very close in formulation to Black MZ. It (Shockley's Gold) is still in production.

  • @frederickwise5238
    @frederickwise5238 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I could immediately see the strikes on the hillside were considerable distance higher!
    Question Does Allient make a 3F MZ powder didnt ask at that video thot I should watch this first. Thanks for the data from these experiments

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Right now, it’s only available as a 2F substitute. Thanks for watching!

    • @dt-zj5nk
      @dt-zj5nk 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have only found FFG Also I believe it has been discontinued

  • @ronaldren5581
    @ronaldren5581 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m curious if the triple 7 pellets would have the same result

  • @cedriccoleman4591
    @cedriccoleman4591 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can I use pyrodex rs ffg in a 1851 44cal revolver?

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes. It won’t have quite as much power as FFFg, but it will still work in a .44 caliber.

  • @cvcoco
    @cvcoco 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    If prices are similar, 777 would save money.

  • @NoosaHeads
    @NoosaHeads 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'd like to do more cap and ball shooting but the mess and cleaning of black powder is considerable. I'd like to find a black powder alternative but I'm in Australia and Blackhorn black powder replacement isn't available here. (as far as I can tell).
    Does anyone have a formula for Blachorn 209 (or something similarly "clean"?). (Pyrodex and 777 are almost as messy and fouling as real black powder). The guns I use are
    1) Original Winchester 1873 rifle. 44/40
    2) Deane Adams and Deane original revolver.
    3) Repro Colt Walker revolver (Colt brand but probably made by Uberti or similar).
    4) original 6 barrel pepperbox pistol.
    5) Original Le Forcheux pinfire revolver.
    The original pistols _must_ have low pressures, or they'll get damaged. I think it'd be too risky to use smokeless powder.
    Any suggestions or assistance would be greatly appreciated.

    • @tomcurran8470
      @tomcurran8470 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The 777 should be cleaner in the way that it is not sulphuric/corrosive. Check out Shooters World/Lovex powders.

    • @NoosaHeads
      @NoosaHeads 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tomcurran8470 Thanks, I will.

  • @GeoffAlbertson
    @GeoffAlbertson 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can I assume that you measured the 777 by 15gr volume, and not by 15gr weight? This may have been only about 12gr of 777 by weight? Can I also assume the black powder was 15gr by volume?

  • @410mossberg
    @410mossberg 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was always concerned about what it takes to clean a gun after using black powder or pyrodex. I believe that black powder is a little easier to clean than pyrodex. I may need to try a pound of triple seven substitute to see if it is easier. What do you think is the best substitute for the purpose of cleaning - pyrodex or triple seven? Thanks for the fine and informative video.

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pyrodex is nasty, so I’d say Triple Seven. It wasn’t hard to clean. Thanks for watching!

    • @southerncountryboy8
      @southerncountryboy8 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      anything is better than pyrodex. I find that it cakes up and is pretty hard to fully remove in certain situations. Black powder fouling just melts away with ballistol and water mixture. can't speak to triple 7, but i imagine it's still better than pyrodex.

    • @kirkboswell2575
      @kirkboswell2575 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Triple Seven. I have a long history of using black powder and substitutes. Generally I prefer black. If you stick with natural lubes, cleanup is with soap and water. No worse than doing the dishes. If you use petroleum based products and lubricants you have to deal with much thicker and more tenacious fouling.
      Pyrodex isn't as easy to clean. Triple 7 is much closer to black, in my experience.

  • @bruceschlegel8588
    @bruceschlegel8588 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you use this triple 7 for the 32 winchester special

  • @kevinmarkham6385
    @kevinmarkham6385 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So... if I got a cartridge conversion for my Remington and then loaded it with cartridges of triple 7, would I have to worry about damaging my gun? The conversion cylinder can handle smokeless powder and the Remington’s top strap strengthens the frame. Would I still need to reduce my powder charges or could I safely shoot 30-35 grain charges?

    • @BogeyTheBear
      @BogeyTheBear 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They write it in red right on the label: _Do Not Use in Cartridges_

    • @kevinmarkham6385
      @kevinmarkham6385 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BogeyTheBear they also write black powder only on the gun but rules are meant to be broken

  • @montanamountainmen6104
    @montanamountainmen6104 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Goex and real black powder is like finding platinum in my part of the country, only one store carries it and its hit or miss. But everyone here carries Pyrodex or Triple 7 , I prefer the Triple 7 for it cleans easier and you use less. The difference is triple 7 here is $26.00 a pound, Pyrodex is $18.00 a pound, real Black Powder when found runs $32.00 a pound.

    • @GunsOfTheWest
      @GunsOfTheWest  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Given the choice between Pyrodex and Triple Seven, I would choose Triple Seven also, for the same reasons. Thanks for watching!

    • @montanamountainmen6104
      @montanamountainmen6104 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Keep up the excellent work.

    • @dmithsmith5880
      @dmithsmith5880 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      If you are a hobbyist type person I would highly encourage you make your own real pressed and corned BP, It is very rewarding once you dial in a method.
      it cost me about $150 in equipment and would be roughly that if you are a little crafty. Most of the cost is the $60 for a 6ton harbor freight shop press and the sifter assortment required for mixing and sorting 2F 3F grain size is about $60.. the rest of the cost was buying scrap aluminum to make the pressing dies. And getting a small stone mortar and pestle for crushing pucks..other then that It is relatively safe fully legal in most states and fairly easy.
      I make my own and once I mastered the art I would never EVER shoot anything else. It is crisp, clean, powerful and of exceptional quality, i would put mine up against a can of Swiss any day. It makes people at the range drool with envy and ends up costing me about $7.25 per 1 1/4 pound batch.
      I should make and post a video of my set up one of these days.
      If you have any questions about any part of the process feel free to shoot me a message 👍 Happy Shooting !

    • @wdtaut5650
      @wdtaut5650 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Smith: Please make that video. There are other how-to black powder videos but I don't remember any that follow what you describe.

    • @cyclonetaylor7838
      @cyclonetaylor7838 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dmithsmith5880 My friend and I make black powder for our cannon and mortars. He works at a railway repair depot with large presses, ovens for charring, and a unlimited supply of sulfur. We also constructed a five gallon ball mill operated remotely by a hundred foot extension cord. It works as well as Goex and takes no time at all to crank out a hundred pounds of powder at very little cost.

  • @Rumblestrip
    @Rumblestrip 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I hope it works for people. I can't get reliable detonation out of triple seven in mine. Always 3 or 4 caps to get it to go off. Seems to be fine with 209 primers. But the #11 & #10 just don't seem to burn hot enough.

    • @discipleochrist4202
      @discipleochrist4202 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I hate triple 7 with a passion. It has delayed ignition if it even ignites.

  • @gregs5295
    @gregs5295 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This helped