Vangoa Desktop CD Player - Review & Test!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 26

  • @einerreklov4304
    @einerreklov4304 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    At the least, you get to see the label as it spins, for what it's worth. I miss that from the days of LPs and 45s. The label artwork in many cases was iconic - Dolton spinning sub, Universal Rainbow, RCA Victor's Nipper, Columbia's Six Eyes, Parrot. I could go on but it would take days.

  • @Suggsonbass
    @Suggsonbass 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    "When your machine fails" ....so funny !!

  • @plan7a
    @plan7a 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    With the cover down it might actually have a better sound, as it may reverberate the sound? What did the 'clicks' do in regards to the knobs? CD players without any display - always a poor show; how do you know what track you are on? And, how much time remaining, etc... Doesn't bode well there!

  • @ThisGuyFrritz
    @ThisGuyFrritz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Whenever I listen to audio CDs on my Hi-Fi stereo setup, I would prefer those that play them in real time over those that would buffer. There was a time when I had a portable CD player hooked up to my stereo (my first one was a component unit, which would later be given to my dad, then to my relatives). But when I got my first DVD player, and later, on Optimus CD-8200, they sounded a little better.
    A few things I think would improve the Vangoa:
    - Display for Track number and ID3 Tags, as well as for the album cover image.
    - Make it more like the other 2 CD players you've shown.
    - "Scratch" sound when Singing Arm is in "off" position. (I thought that would be funny.) 😁

    • @lasskinn474
      @lasskinn474 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the dac's probably better in the latter. portable players tend to have high efficiency integrated dac and (headphone) amplifier to extend battery life. having a buffer on the feed to the microcontroller or chip running the show doesn't make fundamental differences - all players have a buffer anyway, albeit it can be a small one(even just 2 samples), but due to the way the data is on the disc you need it.

  • @0386rm
    @0386rm 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Why are the Chinese infatuated with making EVERYTHING look like a record player? If it were me designing one of these, I don’t think I would even bother with speakers in the device because of the lack of sound quality m, I would primarily just have it transmitting Bluetooth plus having a physical output jack to hard wire it to another amplifier device.

  • @scooterboi8761
    @scooterboi8761 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love your reviews!

    • @Recordology
      @Recordology  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you! :)

  • @misterx420
    @misterx420 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is basically the same as that AFU "vintage" CD player you reviewed back in February. I bet the internals are identical. They look like they even share the same remote. I think the "vintage" player is the better looking one. They are both cute little novelty players though. I would use one of those "vinyl" CD-Rs them.

  • @johnlosert922
    @johnlosert922 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    WMA= an Apple ripping Mode, comparable to MP3 in windows, in case you aren’t familiar with it.

    • @Recordology
      @Recordology  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Isn't WMA "Windows Media Audio?"

    • @JayTheComputerGuy
      @JayTheComputerGuy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Recordologyyeah.. idk what John is talking about.

    • @Cargo_Bay
      @Cargo_Bay 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      WMA was Windows audio format. AAC is what Apple used.

  • @DuckMcKrush
    @DuckMcKrush 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like the record player aesthetic and would work well in my setup. I would rather spend extra $$ and get something more substantial and not in white faux woodgrain. Thanks as always for the great review.

  • @IDPhotoMan
    @IDPhotoMan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I actually disagree, i think the form factor of a record player is pretty cool. Thanks for the video 🙂

  • @lasskinn474
    @lasskinn474 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    what's this about a read cache/buffer on a drive being less """resolution"""? it's the same bytes if you do it the easy and cheap way.
    like it doesn't make sense to add a lossy coder and decoder, maybe it did in 1995 on a high end cd walkman.

    • @Recordology
      @Recordology  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree but thats the way they do it....

  • @johnmarchington3146
    @johnmarchington3146 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I thought you were a bit tough on that player. It didn't seem to be too bad to me. I admit the sound quality wasn't the best.

  • @larrylarry1
    @larrylarry1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Probably cheaper at AliExpress. The no buffer is a good thing.

  • @lizkrinsky5209
    @lizkrinsky5209 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting

  • @whittiertennyson6297
    @whittiertennyson6297 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    These are made for south korean Girls hahahahahah The mechanism in this looks something from PS1 the first big versions.

  • @stanleycostello9610
    @stanleycostello9610 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just as I suspected. Bad as can be. Anyways, have a good week, my friend.

    • @Recordology
      @Recordology  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Have a good week!

  • @georgeprice4212
    @georgeprice4212 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I didn’t peg you as a Weezer fan!

    • @Recordology
      @Recordology  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A part of my nostalgic feelings for high school days.

  • @jasonwilliams6005
    @jasonwilliams6005 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I like a cd player that looks like an actual cd player. Not a fan of this. And sounds terrible. When hearing the grammar in the instructions, I'm not surprised.