All this sponsor says to me is that you don’t care about the environmental impact of AI video generation/model training and are fine downgrading the quality of your work.
for how long have you taken this sponsorship deal? honestly feel that it's directly harmful to the media and fact clarity in the social sphere to support AI.
I'm confused, do you actually use generative AI for content creation, because it looked and sounded more like a joke ? I mean Mexican Army parade at 3:00, inane commentary and a fucking baguette in the few seconds you (pretend?) to present French politics?
Brexit was madness. The advantage is that the rest of Europe has seen how badly it ends. To me, supporting Brexit feels almost like an economic conspiracy theory.
@@kuokkamdamha1691 Euro based financial transactions, like clearing and derivatives have only just begun to migrate from the City to EU financial centres. Let's see what the impact entails for the UK when the outflow really gains momentum..
@@kuokkamdamha1691the advance exists for all members. But yes, weaker economies are benefitting more for obvious reasons. Nonetheless, there is a massive benefit for all members, including strong economies that are better off inside than outside. History proofs this. Just look at the UK. The sick man of Europe before joining then became the economic capital of the EU after joining and now it's back on track to being the sick man.
Fidias, a Greek Cypriot TH-camr and now MEP, has just made a video about education - he thinks the main issue is that youngsters are not taught about critical thinking.
Kind of ironic you saying "In Europe, we never talk about Brexit" in a comment on a European video about Brexit. Clearly you do talk about it sometimes, you're doing it right now. And your view of how often it's talked about in the UK is probably biased by where you encounter Brits. There is not a lot of Brexit related stuff in the main headlines these days, and it's not something the average person talks about much any more. But of course if you look in the certain places online there will be people talking about it.
what does the UK offer the EU?.. As an Eu citizen, I wouldn't take back the UK until all UK media and politicians stops lying about the EU, until the UK signs on to full €uro and schengen, no special deals, opt-outs or cherry picking.
@@micklenier6152 that isn't enough for the uncertainty of the UK possible choosing to leave again when an election gets back the Conservatives or Reform UK.
@@gawkthimm6030Will you have not learned your lesson the first time? making twice the same joke would be no longer funny, although it would be the first time doing it twice (when it comes to leaving the EU). I don't think there may be a second brexit, especially when what a flop the first one is. PS although you maybe right, the US elected Trump the second time.
I'd like UK back in the EU... But not right now. I think it's a break up that needs to run it's course - for people to truly process and understand it. Brits need to figure out which of their problems where EU related and witch ones where not. And by that I mean a grand majority of Brits. And when they do rejoin it should be with full confidence and dedication to the whole European project, not just a means to get the trade numbers up.
As a UK citizen, I voted remain. I was 18 at the time and would have wanted future generations to benefit from being a part of the EU, my generation is sick at the outcome of Brexit. Personally I’m sick too at our media, who keep saying bad things about the EU, who don’t admit it was a mistake. And the prime ministers who don’t listen to the country’s needs, only to settle internal party disputes, Cameron, why did you do this to our country. Also I liked the partial freedom of movement, everything about the EU I thought was beneficial to both sides, we could stand up to America, China and India, I just wish it never happened. If we did rejoin I’d like it to be the same, without the Euro, however with full freedom of movement, please don’t think all UK citizens are pro Brexit, it’s likely they were just sold a fantasy outcome
At this rate the UK is never entering the EU again. They were one of the first countries to join the EU after it's establishment. This time around they will not get the same benefitial treatment, especially not until the arrogance of UK politics surrounding Brexit is forgotten. It's sad but the reality is that the UK would rather dig it's own grave than try to make amends.
While on 1 hand I would like the UK to be closer to the EU again, on the other hand I think it should stay as it is. They chose this isolationist path, and should walk it. If you tell them they can have more of the pros without the cons of the EU, it's more wood on the fire for hard eurosceptic (far-right)parties.
There's more remain voters today than there are leave voters. The population today didn't decide its fate and over time the pro-eu youth are the ones punished the longest. I voted for brexit but pro-eu, just fell victim to the "fund our NHS" message, our health service is something i greatly value and assumed we would have had soft brexit or no brexit. I lay in my self made bed lol
In the unlikely event the UK reapplies for EU membership within our lifetimes there's no chance in hell they'll recuperate all the advantages and exceptions they once enjoyed. A new membership would be following the same clauses as any new member, including adopting the Euro as currency.
Brother the UK will be the Only country in Europe with out Right wing party lol people don't know what they're talking about. Euroskeptic label is given to the UK but the reality there are loads country in the EU who don't agree with France, its portrayed as unified.
It's very clear to me. We will not be able to find anything better than the EU. I was too young to vote in the 2016 referendum and if there was another referendum I would vote to rejoin it and become an even more committed member to it than we were before we left. We are a European country and other European countries are our closest neighbours, they should therefore be our main trading partners and allies, not Trump's America. None of these other alternative agreements with the EU are going to be more practical or logical than rejoining the EU. I don't think the problem is that the Labour Party is ideologically pro-Brexit, I think they're simply conforming to Brexit voters, but these are voters who don't even represent public opinion anymore, more recent polls show that the British public thinks that Brexit was a bad idea, therefore I think it should be reversed. If Trump does start ruining our economy with tariffs, then the answer is that we (Remainers) were right the whole time, Brexit was never a good idea, it was never going to improve our economy, and it was only ever based on far right ideas about increased sovereignty, breaking international law, opposition to immigration, and Islamophobia.
when the ussr broke up, yeltsin said this phrase: "take as much sovereignty as you can swallow". sovereignty means little when you're small, alone, dispensable or even of little relevance. who would listen to ones terms and requirements, to ones needs at the negotiating table against giants? what is a mouse's sovereignty when negotiating with elephants? immigration, islamophobia, etc are all debatable topics, but the fundamental thing is that a united team working on common interests is stronger and can bring real sovereignty when dealing with greater actors on the geopolitical scene than going at it alone with separate deals.
As a Brit, we need media reform before the EU, and I think it's likely we will have to adopt the euro. Our right wing partys and media is corrupt and needs reform. Only then will Europe take us seriously again.
We will have to adopt the euro. It would be a big talking point but likely show commitment to the EU. If the EU allowed the UK to veto the euro while still joining it would be bending over for the UK, where as it doesn't need us, we need them more.
The Euro is literally a failing currency, if we did that our economy would tank (plus what would happen to the hundreds of billions of pounds held in foreign reserves by other countries)
@@shaaravguha3760Many British also said that using the metric system for money and measures are "too stupid", "too complicated", "too French" ... And no, what happened to Grèce has nothing to do with the Euro and everything to do with mismanagement of the Greek gov' ...
@@lhemnenn4713 When did I mention greece... And we say everything is too french or too complicated, that's not the actual reason we don't do something though.
As far as I know, according to World Trade Organization rules, which is how the UK and the US trade because they have no trade deal, any country that wishes to impose tariffs on any good or service has to implement those tariffs on all countries that it trades with under WTO terms. This means that if the US wishes to impose tariffs on China or the European Union, it would have to impose them on the UK too unless they sign a trade agreement.
There are a lot of chapeaus / exceptions to WTO law such as a notorious national security clause which makes a lot of trade restrictions exist without adhering to the Most favoured nation principle like you allured to
You mean the WTO rules, the UK does violate each and every day? You are right, non-discrimination is perhaps the most important idea of the WTO, but the UK cannot demand these rules when they themselves are amongst the large scale violators of these rules!
Brexit is one of the perfect example of politics over everything else. Even if unquestionable proof would show a huge trillion dollar benefit of joining back into the EU they would still not join back, cause "reasons". I have not heard one single example where the UK does better since Brexit. But watched, red multiple statistics, videos, news about how much worse they are doing...
...but for the EU it brings gifted people, money, gold, companies and fa tories and business. Do you really think European politicians would risk that and annoy their voters by stemming that influx? There is the fact that it must be more profitable for the EU to let the UK back....and the sum of insulty and lies thrown at the EU and its member states must be compensated for. Boy, will that be expensive for the UK...
No thanks. Even Brexiters (Not me) said that they didn't hate Europe but did hate the European Union. I do not want to become an American State, but most likely if that happened then the Democrats would win more elections.
@@shaaravguha3760 its not about a party being far left or far right, it is their policies, extremist parties tend to be authoritarian yes, but both labour and the conservatives are very authoritarian
I like that you highlight what is your opinion and what is fact, this should be a standard. I open the local newspaper and its full of opinions and lacking facts, while yours is the other way around.
Appreciate the comment. We are thinking of doing it like this in the future. 80% facts and if the video warrants it an opinion at the end.. but a clear indication when it is opinion.
Definitely, Britons have inventiveness and noin-othodow thinking. The EU is a "bloc" (very pejorative). It is rather a union where countries have to accept their differences and adopt a "modus vivendi". Dull with plenty of regulations for all EU countries to be on the same pace. A typical British attitude - like your brilliant video - is to analyse what is needed for the UK. Very intertesting but almost useless. The UK possibilities are: (1) renegue on existing agreements like the TCA and go NO DEAL, (2) accept the existing situation and live with it, (3) make the effort to join the EU by fully complying to admission rules. There is NO OTHER WAY. Forget about renegociating the TCA, forget about bending the EU rules, forget about having the benefits of membership while remaining outside. Again you, UK are free to do what you want and we in the EU are free to defend our rules. So the present UK relationship with the EU is that of a third country like Zimbabwe or the USA. Why would the EU spend years of talking to a country that does not know whether it wants to be IN or OUT of the EU.
I love your channel, you give us the facts and always state when its "in my opinion", separating the facts from your opinion and the visuals are very good too.
I love how the title assumes that Brexit wasn't already a wreck even without Trump😂 I said it 8 years ago, and i'm still saying it now: it makes zero sense to dump our largest (by a wide margin) and geographically closest trading partner so that we can instead have a ton of small and separate deals that don't benefit us as much. Brexit has been a disaster, as anyone with half a brain knew it was going to be. Trump or no Trump, it's time the UK stopped following the US around like a lost puppy and actually got some backbone and rejected that ultra-capitalist hellscape. I anxiously await the day the British public elect a party that is willing to do what is best for the country and not just what will guarantee them a job at the next election.
A point of frustration in Britain-and for me, a staunch Europhile-is just what you said at 9:27: the E.U. is _working_ on these agreements. Less than half are done deals. Why? Well, the Mercosur negotiations of 2022 come to mind. Every E.U. member was happy…except France, who proceeded to torpedo the whole affair. National vetos continue to hamstring the bloc at every turn. The E.U. needs to find a way to end the veto while giving individual member states sufficient internal sovereignty to keep them in the bloc. Your recent suggestion of a Swiss-style federation could be a good start. The Swiss federal government sets trade, foreign, and military policy, but Swiss Kantons retain control over most domestic affairs. They even retain partial control over immigration policy: Kantons can veto visa applications and can set bespoke citizenship requirements. Even the Orbans and Le Pens of Europe might find it hard to refuse that offer.
The Swiss model is pretty much the EU, except that in the EU Individual countries set military and foreign policy. All EU nations have control over their domestic affairs, and individual nations set their own visa requirements and have bespoke citizenship requirements.
I think Brexit poisoned the discussion about EU in GB. I mean while there were a lot of experts warning about Brexit, it happened precisely because the Brits (or more precisely: some Brits) ignored them. How can the government justify going back on that? While I suppose that this will improve, in the end, the Brits have to decide where they will go.
Among the public it is essentially a settled issue that If we can we should go back into the EU, over 80% of Brits (including me) think we should, it's just our extremely unrepresentative government that is ruling it out
It’s more like 58:42 rejoin:stay out but that’s without going into the details of what it would mean. When you get a bit more granular and ask how they would vote if rejoining meant we would have to accept the euro it becomes anything from a tie to 45:55 rejoin:stay out. I’m not sure where any poll that says 80% came from but there’s very few issues where 80%+ of the public agree and brexit certainly isn’t one of them
@@nareik00 No matter what, article 49 and Copenhagen criteria. No funny deals. You are a third country, and the EU is not in the habit of giving them presents, which, in this case would not be deserved anyway.
Obviously Trump will slap stupid tariffs on imports of any product containing,aided or built using Chinese goods wherever it's made.. that includes Britain.
Its not just the UK, The UK gets all the Euroskeptic labeling but there are many many in the EU that don't agree with everything Denmark, Iceland, Norway, Switerland etc and even germany, Italy and Greece to a lesser extent. Its equally false to say its only the UK, Ireland isn't in all of the EU structures either not apart of Schengen I believe.
@@spacetime3 Nothing wrong with being sceptical. The EU isn't perfect and will always be a work in progress. But change is achieved from within, and not by leaving.
@@maartenaalsmeerThe UK had to leave. The eu is ran like a big Germany. The UK is no better being ran like a neo feudal system. The UK is military weak against Russia. Even America dare not mess with Russia directly. Either way the Uk and the eu should find some common ground for the young on cultural exchanges.
@@colinsmith1288 _The UK is no better being ran like a neo feudal system_ The UK *is* a neo-feudal system: unelected House of Lords, archaic FPTP voting system, no written constitution and a monarch as both leader of the country and the church. I'm not sure what point (if any) you're trying to make? The UK *had* to leave? OK, fine by me.
Starmer is incapable of even conceiving noticeable policy movement. Nobody will ever take him seriously. Even an idiot like Johnson would be a better fit - he wouldn't even read what he's signing like last time.
We the citizens of EU should have a referendum on if we are going to accept them back. And then just vote no. That will be a nice response to their Brexit.
Are you really going to vote against allowing Britain to rejoin the EU just based on disliking us? Remember, even if there is a nationalist problem in Britain, I have 2 responses if that is what you think: 1. Preventing Britain from rejoining the EU would not help make Britain a more progressive country, it would only confirm pre-existing beliefs about nationalism. 2. Many EU members also have their own far right nationalist problems and you probably know it, it would therefore be wrong to say Britain is bad but the rest of Europe is perfect.
@@Worldmisery We don't dislike you lol. But it would be deserved to say no to you. You took this decision listening the dumber people in your society and now you have the audacity to want to revert it.
@@Worldmisery i don't mind a sane amount of nationalism, but i don't like when there is no understanding about "team effort, compromises and benefits". we have enough euroskeptics of our own and hopefully they will remain small enough to encourage necessary reformation, even though its getting very challenging lately. in this scenario, the uk is a good example why going alone is worse. personally i'd vote for rejoin on our side, with or without the euro, but for now, thanks for the sacrifice i guess.
@@Pachi9- No you're wrong. I never took this decision because I was too young to vote in the 2016 referendum. You are therefore judging me based on what older voters chose to do nearly 10 years ago. If you are not forgiving of bad choices made even in the recent past then the problem I think is that you aren't progressive enough to respect other nations, even when it is in the interests of the EU as a whole.
@@Worldmisery How is it possible that UK always need to be forgiven for shit they 've done. If it was any other country I would be ok. But it's really annoying. Plus there are many reasons to not take them back.
when the ussr broke up, yeltsin said this phrase: "take as much sovereignty as you can carry". sovereignty means little when you're small, alone, dispensable or even of little relevance. who would listen to ones terms and requirements, to ones needs at the negotiating table against giants? what is a mouse's sovereignty when negotiating with elephants? immigration, islamophobia, etc are all debatable topics, but the fundamental thing is that a united team working on common interests is stronger and can bring real sovereignty when dealing with greater actors on the geopolitical scene than going at it alone with separate deals.
The EU helpfully wrote down in article 49 and Copenhagen criteria how and what you have to do. No negotiations, take it or stay out. Ah yes, countries you insulted can veto the ascension.
Do not give them anything for free. They wanted to be alone, we should let them. If they wanna come back they can, but only after they adopt Euro and list of other agreements to ensure harder decupling in the future. We are either in it together or not at all.
I'm British, it has been clear that Brexit was an awful idea since before the vote. It is also true that we put ourselves in this mess, and we will never get our old deal back. Equally, it's not right to act as if we offer nothing and we should stay out because we just mean trouble, as a minority seem to accross the Internet and in this comment section. As was mentioned in the video, it can only benefit both sides if we align closer (the UK is Europe's second largest economy after all). If the cause of Brexit was lies and division spread by Nigel Farage and his people, surley hit helps nothing to approach any attempt at building back relations with a similar attitude on either side. Although i'm sure a lot of the negative comments are just Russian bots trying to make the West weaker
Nope, I am German, and the many ways in which the comments here suggest the UK must get a special deal are appalling. You are a random third country, and you are free to use article 49 and fulfill Copenhagen criteria to apply. But the continual suggestion that the UK would be a "special" candidate that "surely" gets better conditions makes me think, you are still on your old cherry picking ways. That is why we think you should be kept out until you lose that arrogance and entitlement.
@spacetime3 and they lobbied to leave lol. Also Germans were most pro expansion to earn new markets. About history, UK was always against Poland you silly.
I honestly think that if we had a government that was really trying to get back in we could manage it in less than a decade, almost every structure, even schengen, is supported by the majority of our population, and even the euro wouldn't be an issue, becuase every new member is given 5 to 10 years to adopt it, easily enough time to swing the publics opinion, we even retain most regulations and laws being in line with eu standards.
But getting back into the EU doesn't just happen because the UK and its citizens want it to happen. It only happens when the 27 EU member states also want it to happen.
The Euro adoption would be very very tricky. If we ignore for a second that it is a failing currency (one of the reasons we left the EU in the first place, their common market is just as much of a poison as it is a benefit), the pound is a thing of national pride. It'll not be abandoned anytime soon. (plus it's actually doing well right now which is more then I can say for the euro)
Euro €, 40 years no leave, metric system, driving on the right and building your HSR and you are allowed back in. You can take you time with the right side driving, but about the rest we don't talk.
Aside from the right side of the road which would be actually impossible to do, and the high speed rail that we really don't have the money for right now but we can definitely do in the future, that sounds pretty reasonable, also the 40 years without leaving isn't necessary, the collective British psyche has been scarred by Brexit, and if we rejoined we would be one of the most pro EU countries in the union
Labour does want to re-join, It's just that their hands are tied because they pledged during the election not to re-join anything. And the only reason they did that was to try to appeal to as many people as they could after being out of power for 14 years. I feel like Labour want to merely for now set the groundwork for re-joining by signing up to bits and pieces here and there. And then maybe during the next election if they win, they might be more open to it.
imho Trump only cares about money and power. He will always prefer trade with the E.U. over GB. Also, brexit can never be a success because all over the world and history successful neighbouring countries were and are those who trade the most with each other certainly when one is much smaler then the other.
He wants to have his cake and eat it. Loot the nhs and impoverish the average brit, to create a couple of new US billionaires. And drive a wedge between the UK and EU. If the torries are in charge they'd do it too. Impoverish thr nation as a whole, just as long as they and their oligarch friends, get their cut.
@@Pouncer9000 I'm not one, but world leader's and analysts can't afford not to try to get into Trump's head right now. And this very video makes assumptions on what's going on inside his head.
Imagine a substance as ancient as the fires of Sinai, an elixir that transcends centuries, carrying within it both the power to heal and the force to reveal. This is no mere balm but a sacred oil-the chrism, veiled in mystery, woven with threads of the miraculous. To touch it is to approach the holy, to be marked as one set apart. Once, it was the pride of Israel, held in reverence by a people who saw within its touch the promise of wholeness and truth. Now, against the odds and far from its homeland, its essence stirs again-not in Judea, but in the lands of Polin, where the prayers and songs of the Jewish people took root, flourishing over a thousand years. This is no fantastical draught from children’s tales of sorcery; it is real, potent beyond the imaginings of any bard. Sara Benet, a scholar with Jewish blood and Polish soul, unearthed a secret long buried under the dust of centuries. The mysterious “kaneh-bosm” of the Bible, mistranslated and misunderstood as “calamus,” was in fact the sacred Cannabis. With this revelation, the recipe for the chrism oil was born anew, a potion once known only to prophets and priests. Its purpose? Not merely to heal, though heal it may, but to expose, to burn away the veil between soul and body. On healthy flesh, it rests benignly; but on those weighted by hidden sins, it ignites-a searing fire, a divine reckoning, warning of the darkness festering within. In ancient days, this oil was not for the common folk. Only kings and priests dared anoint themselves with it, and its fiery power was a test for the spirit. Any unworthy soul would cry out under its touch, sins laid bare in agony and light. The chrism oil did not simply soothe; it searched the heart, lifting away the facades, following the threads of remorse and guilt woven deeply into sinew and marrow. It demanded purity, separating those destined for greatness from those left chained to their failings. Chrism oil may sometimes be a cure, but it is always a revealer. It illuminates the hidden places where sins fester, where burdens lie waiting to break forth into affliction if left unchecked. And now Poland, a land molded by suffering and strength, has become the unlikely cradle of this rediscovery. Here, in this soil layered with the resilience of centuries, the ancient blend breathes again. In my own research, from the hallowed halls of Stanford to remote places of healing, I have sought to comprehend its power-not as a relic, but as a bridge between body and spirit, a means to glimpse the mysteries that lie beyond the surface. This oil can be created by your own hands, yet it demands reverence, caution, and the courage to face what lies hidden within. If you feel the call to step beyond the bounds of the ordinary, to welcome this potent ancient elixir into your life, then I invite you to explore further. “The Secret of the Chrism Oil,” now on Amazon, awaits those ready to encounter healing and the secrets of the soul. Exodus 30, 22-33 www.amazon.com/Secret-Chrism-Oil-Slawek-Wojtowicz/dp/B0CDNKS8K6/?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_w=JdEs9&content-id=amzn1.sym.9f654aa3-75f1-42ea-bb2c-1136f91b121f&pf_rd_p=9f654aa3-75f1-42ea-bb2c-1136f91b121f&pf_rd_r=136-3698562-9391347&pd_rd_wg=fB7KZ&pd_rd_r=187e0701-5967-4097-b955-bd24cbf25b00&ref_=aufs_ap_sc_dsk
@@FenryrGrey since Brexit immigration has hit 750,000 per year and the whole country knows this, it pretty settled that Brexit didn't do shit to stop immigration
_What about an EU-Swiss style policy for the UK_ Not available for the UK. The EU stated numerous times that it doesn't want any other Swiss-style deals.
The UK is not like the Swiss Confederation. Neither politically, geographically, economically, or historically ... The UK is also not bound to the absolute neutrality of the Swiss, instead it's part of NATO ... The deals between Switzerland and the EU are very specific, and complicated, none of this could even be applicable with the UK ...
This is incorrect. American consumers have far more purchasing power than European consumers do. This is why Europe is already reliant on exports - average Europeans don't have the fiscal space to buy what is currently being produced in Europe. It is wholly unrealistic to expect Europe to absorb the exports currently going to the US.
That isn't what's important here, it's that we have triple the trade with the EU than we do with the US and whichever side we side with, the other is going to tariff us, large scale EU tariffs would be a disaster
@itszealous1400 that's true. I'm disagreeing with the video. He's suggesting the UK can simply transfer its US trade to the EU, which is a fantasy at best and completely delusional at worst.
Joining the customs union is just going to make brexit look like a massive loss. Just about all the 'freedoms' they get from leaving are being free from these regulations. If they join the customs union they will be stuck with all the 'problems' they had while being a member, but without any say on what happens in the eu
The Customs Union is only available for EU and EFTA members. The UK is neither. EFTA-membership will be vetoed by members Iceland and Norway. No cherry-picking options available for the UK.
The UK is going to do what they always do: try to have their cake and eat it too, but this time they’ll end up without the American trade deal and outside of the EU. America doesn’t need the UK, nor does the EU, while the UK could use any help they can get
@ that represents about 50% of all the trade that the UK does, now look for the percentage it represents for the total EU foreign trade, that should give you a clue of whom needs who the most.
@@didixtar2863 Trade with the EU is 40% of the UKs exports and a bit less then 50% of its imports. the UK makes up around 15% of the EUs total exports. It'll be a bigger hit to the UK if relations collapse but both sides will suffer greatly either way.
@@shaaravguha3760 Last time France alone closed the border the UK crawled to the negotiation table after three days and did what was requested. That makes quite sure who has the upper hand here.
!!I recently sold some of my long-term position and currently sitting on about 350k, do you think Nvidia is a good buy right now or I have I missed out on a crucial buy period, any good stock recommendation on great performing stocks will be appreciated.
As a newbie investor, it’s essential for you to have a mentor to keep you accountable. Ruth Ann Tsakonas is my trade analyst, she has guided me to identify key market trends, pinpointed strategic entry points, and provided risk assessments, ensuring my trades decisions align with market dynamics for optimal returns.
I managed to grow a nest egg of around 120k to over a Million. I'm especially grateful to Adviser Ruth Ann Tsakonas, for her expertise and exposure to different areas of the market..
I don't really blame people who panic. Lack of information can be a big hurdle. I've been making more than $200k passively by just investing through an advisor, and I don't have to do much work.. Inflation or no inflation, my finances remain secure. So I really don't blame people who panic.
Without a doubt! Ruth Ann Tsakonas is a trader who goes above and beyond. she has an exceptional skill for analysing market movements and spotting profitable opportunities. Her strategies are meticulously crafted on thorough research and years of practical experience.
how would you recommend i enter the crypto market? I am also looking at studying some traders and copying their strategy rather than investing myself and losing money emotionally.. What's your take on this approach? and How can i reach her, if you don't mind me asking?
Joining the customs union is politically tricky. A lot of brexit voters voted tory in 2019 and then labour in 2024. Labour cannot win without these voters.
What does that prove other than nothing? It just means that if the Labour Party wants to reverse Brexit because many of its voters want it, then other voters will vote for an awful idea by voting for an awful party like the Tories or Reform UK. I was too young to vote in 2016, so it's not actually my referendum. If I can't vote to rejoin the EU just because older voters don't think I should be allowed to vote, then the UK is not a democracy.
@@Worldmisery if labour unilaterally entered the customs union then that would almost certainly mean a Tory government and kemi badenoch as PM by 2029. Idk about you but I'll take starmerism any day over that
@@oliverkerins5628 No all of that is wrong. Public opinion is changing towards the EU. The British public has become less pro-Brexit. In fact some polls even suggest that if there was another referendum then Britain would actually vote to rejoin the EU. If you're really worried about the the Tories, then read this. The Tories are becoming less relevant because Reform UK is growing. Brexit voters won't vote Tory because everyone is fed up of them after 14 years of uselessness. In fact if they don't recover in the next election then they might never be relevant ever again. The only real reason you have to disagree with me is because you are Pro-Brexit.
And you trust them? How stupid are you? You might be leaving the biggest trading block in the world next .. *crickets* Well, you might believe them, then... *sigh*
That's ridiculous. If all you have is bad analogies then you don't actually have a point. Also what baggage did you have the EU other than wanting to break international law and discriminate against minorities?
@@cooldad4 Oh no. Not this again. Many EU laws are actually better because they are intended to protect our human rights and democracy, these are the exact laws that the Tories removed and replaced with other laws so that they could undermine our democracy. You can't even name one of these laws that you think we should remove.
@@Worldmisery In fact it was the transparency initiative. They wanted to prevent their dirty deals become visible. All the rest was jsut smole and mirrors and for the birds to make the populace vote against its own interest.
Not the current basket case, no. This is not the level headed Brits from the seventies, those are complete cuckoo now. Keep them out until they sober up!
EU trade agreements have completely stalled, like its economy which was the same size as the US in 2008, now its half the size. Reducing the over regualtion is the best way to grow the UK economy and make its industries more competitive on the world stage.
Absolute fantasy. The UK will benefit a lot from the current situation. The current situation favors the country that can handle the EU's bureaucracy for the US. Aside from the UK, there are 2 candidates for that position. Denmark and the Netherlands.
I would like to see the UK back in the EU. And I'd love to see Norway and Iceland here too. That is the most rational thing to do. Then we can give the middle finger to 'Murica, China and Russia. We have the potential to be our own superpower.
It's all well and good having opinions on brexit, but that's all they can be, opinions. There is no way to determine whether or not brexit was a good or bad thing in the long running of the UK until they start teaching about it in history lessons. In the short term, it appears negative, but that was to be expected by everyone, even many brexiters, whether or not it was a good decision has yet to be proven because it's the long term that matters at the end of the day.
Good god, you are not serious? Anything good can develop out of anything someday! Doesn't make it better now. The numbers tell a pretty surefire way that it was a horrible decision
People keep talking about the UK needing the EU vice versa etc etc. Most nations aren't a part of a massive supranational trading bloc, much less one that incorporates political union, and they're doing just fine, I live in such a country. It's a big world out there, and most people get around it just fine. (This is to all the Europeans who think the EU is the peak model AND to the Brexiteers who swear it's the death of mankind)
@@xoagig BRICS will never work as long as india and China are both in it, one of them needs to go since they can't get along. India is doing everything in its power to stop chinese firms from selling in india, why would they endorse a common market.
Trump has already been talking about exemptions to the U.K. It's not "highly likely" that he will impose severe tariffs. Trump SUPPORTED Brexit in 2016. Your video title is click bait.
@@gawkthimm6030 No they won't. The EU and the UK have good relations, the UK striking a good trade deal won't cause the EU to give them harsher conditions, these are large countries not little children.
Im sorry, while i love the channel, finding out your videos are just AI generated did not just make me lose all trust in the information, but also all desire to watch 😕 Good luck in your future yt endeavors...
@@EUMadeSimple I'm confused, do you actually use generative AI for content creation, because it looked and sounded more like a joke ? I mean Mexican Army parade at 3:00, inane commentary and a fucking baguette in the few seconds you (pretend?) to present French politics?
![BOWKYLION - วิงวอน (ex-change) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cLdnZWDaO-w/mqdefault.jpg)
Try Invideo AI for free invideo.io/i/EUMS and use my code “EUMS50” to get 2x the number of video generation credits in the first month!
All this sponsor says to me is that you don’t care about the environmental impact of AI video generation/model training and are fine downgrading the quality of your work.
for how long have you taken this sponsorship deal?
honestly feel that it's directly harmful to the media and fact clarity in the social sphere to support AI.
I'm confused, do you actually use generative AI for content creation, because it looked and sounded more like a joke ?
I mean Mexican Army parade at 3:00, inane commentary and a fucking baguette in the few seconds you (pretend?) to present French politics?
Get better sponsors
Brexit was madness. The advantage is that the rest of Europe has seen how badly it ends. To me, supporting Brexit feels almost like an economic conspiracy theory.
It's not that advantageous to all members
@@kuokkamdamha1691 It's very advantageous for *all* members!
@@kuokkamdamha1691 Euro based financial transactions, like clearing and derivatives have only just begun to migrate from the City to EU financial centres. Let's see what the impact entails for the UK when the outflow really gains momentum..
@@kuokkamdamha1691the advance exists for all members. But yes, weaker economies are benefitting more for obvious reasons. Nonetheless, there is a massive benefit for all members, including strong economies that are better off inside than outside. History proofs this. Just look at the UK. The sick man of Europe before joining then became the economic capital of the EU after joining and now it's back on track to being the sick man.
Fidias, a Greek Cypriot TH-camr and now MEP, has just made a video about education - he thinks the main issue is that youngsters are not taught about critical thinking.
The sooner we're back in the EU the better.
For the UK, not the EU; least until re-joining has become a non-partisan issue within the UK.
In Europe, we never talk about Brexit.
In the UK, talking about Brexit happens daily .
Imagine that 🤡🤡
This is an EU channel. It's barely a topic in the UK. Although i do wish we could rejoin lol... hopefully one day we will apply.
Kind of ironic you saying "In Europe, we never talk about Brexit" in a comment on a European video about Brexit. Clearly you do talk about it sometimes, you're doing it right now.
And your view of how often it's talked about in the UK is probably biased by where you encounter Brits. There is not a lot of Brexit related stuff in the main headlines these days, and it's not something the average person talks about much any more. But of course if you look in the certain places online there will be people talking about it.
You sort of belie your own comment. Also, the UK is in Europe.
@@SirAmnesia barely a topic?!?!?1 my friend is fucking raging he cant move to EU because of it
@@SirAmnesia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potential_re-accession_of_the_United_Kingdom_to_the_European_Union
Please...... Take us back in 😭 too young to vote at the time :(
what does the UK offer the EU?.. As an Eu citizen, I wouldn't take back the UK until all UK media and politicians stops lying about the EU, until the UK signs on to full €uro and schengen, no special deals, opt-outs or cherry picking.
@@gawkthimm6030 workforce and food
@@micklenier6152 that isn't enough for the uncertainty of the UK possible choosing to leave again when an election gets back the Conservatives or Reform UK.
@@gawkthimm6030 I agree. We should only accept the UK back if they accept Euro and Schengen.
@@gawkthimm6030Will you have not learned your lesson the first time?
making twice the same joke would be no longer funny, although it would be the first time doing it twice (when it comes to leaving the EU).
I don't think there may be a second brexit, especially when what a flop the first one is.
PS although you maybe right, the US elected Trump the second time.
I'd like UK back in the EU... But not right now.
I think it's a break up that needs to run it's course - for people to truly process and understand it. Brits need to figure out which of their problems where EU related and witch ones where not. And by that I mean a grand majority of Brits. And when they do rejoin it should be with full confidence and dedication to the whole European project, not just a means to get the trade numbers up.
As a UK citizen, I voted remain. I was 18 at the time and would have wanted future generations to benefit from being a part of the EU, my generation is sick at the outcome of Brexit. Personally I’m sick too at our media, who keep saying bad things about the EU, who don’t admit it was a mistake. And the prime ministers who don’t listen to the country’s needs, only to settle internal party disputes, Cameron, why did you do this to our country. Also I liked the partial freedom of movement, everything about the EU I thought was beneficial to both sides, we could stand up to America, China and India, I just wish it never happened. If we did rejoin I’d like it to be the same, without the Euro, however with full freedom of movement, please don’t think all UK citizens are pro Brexit, it’s likely they were just sold a fantasy outcome
I mean it would be great with the Euro too tbh
don't worry, we have enough frexiters, itaexiters, netherexiters, etc of our own.
If you don't want the Euro, the obvious answer is to stay out.
At this rate the UK is never entering the EU again. They were one of the first countries to join the EU after it's establishment. This time around they will not get the same benefitial treatment, especially not until the arrogance of UK politics surrounding Brexit is forgotten. It's sad but the reality is that the UK would rather dig it's own grave than try to make amends.
While on 1 hand I would like the UK to be closer to the EU again, on the other hand I think it should stay as it is. They chose this isolationist path, and should walk it. If you tell them they can have more of the pros without the cons of the EU, it's more wood on the fire for hard eurosceptic (far-right)parties.
There's more remain voters today than there are leave voters. The population today didn't decide its fate and over time the pro-eu youth are the ones punished the longest. I voted for brexit but pro-eu, just fell victim to the "fund our NHS" message, our health service is something i greatly value and assumed we would have had soft brexit or no brexit. I lay in my self made bed lol
In the unlikely event the UK reapplies for EU membership within our lifetimes there's no chance in hell they'll recuperate all the advantages and exceptions they once enjoyed. A new membership would be following the same clauses as any new member, including adopting the Euro as currency.
Brother the UK will be the Only country in Europe with out Right wing party lol people don't know what they're talking about. Euroskeptic label is given to the UK but the reality there are loads country in the EU who don't agree with France, its portrayed as unified.
A lot of the people who voted leave are now dead. As their parting wish to fuck over the youth who wanted remain.
@@SirAmnesiayikes, turkey voting for Christmas
Brexit was the most insane move ever.
It's very clear to me. We will not be able to find anything better than the EU. I was too young to vote in the 2016 referendum and if there was another referendum I would vote to rejoin it and become an even more committed member to it than we were before we left. We are a European country and other European countries are our closest neighbours, they should therefore be our main trading partners and allies, not Trump's America. None of these other alternative agreements with the EU are going to be more practical or logical than rejoining the EU.
I don't think the problem is that the Labour Party is ideologically pro-Brexit, I think they're simply conforming to Brexit voters, but these are voters who don't even represent public opinion anymore, more recent polls show that the British public thinks that Brexit was a bad idea, therefore I think it should be reversed.
If Trump does start ruining our economy with tariffs, then the answer is that we (Remainers) were right the whole time, Brexit was never a good idea, it was never going to improve our economy, and it was only ever based on far right ideas about increased sovereignty, breaking international law, opposition to immigration, and Islamophobia.
when the ussr broke up, yeltsin said this phrase: "take as much sovereignty as you can swallow". sovereignty means little when you're small, alone, dispensable or even of little relevance.
who would listen to ones terms and requirements, to ones needs at the negotiating table against giants? what is a mouse's sovereignty when negotiating with elephants?
immigration, islamophobia, etc are all debatable topics, but the fundamental thing is that a united team working on common interests is stronger and can bring real sovereignty when dealing with greater actors on the geopolitical scene than going at it alone with separate deals.
As a Brit, we need media reform before the EU, and I think it's likely we will have to adopt the euro. Our right wing partys and media is corrupt and needs reform. Only then will Europe take us seriously again.
We will have to adopt the euro. It would be a big talking point but likely show commitment to the EU. If the EU allowed the UK to veto the euro while still joining it would be bending over for the UK, where as it doesn't need us, we need them more.
uk and the euro? i dont see that happening any time soon
The Euro is literally a failing currency, if we did that our economy would tank (plus what would happen to the hundreds of billions of pounds held in foreign reserves by other countries)
@@shaaravguha3760Many British also said that using the metric system for money and measures are "too stupid", "too complicated", "too French" ...
And no, what happened to Grèce has nothing to do with the Euro and everything to do with mismanagement of the Greek gov' ...
@@lhemnenn4713 When did I mention greece...
And we say everything is too french or too complicated, that's not the actual reason we don't do something though.
As far as I know, according to World Trade Organization rules, which is how the UK and the US trade because they have no trade deal, any country that wishes to impose tariffs on any good or service has to implement those tariffs on all countries that it trades with under WTO terms. This means that if the US wishes to impose tariffs on China or the European Union, it would have to impose them on the UK too unless they sign a trade agreement.
There are a lot of chapeaus / exceptions to WTO law such as a notorious national security clause which makes a lot of trade restrictions exist without adhering to the Most favoured nation principle like you allured to
the WTO is pretty much defunct at this point
Tariffs are like communism. On paper it's sounds great, but in reality...
You mean the WTO rules, the UK does violate each and every day? You are right, non-discrimination is perhaps the most important idea of the WTO, but the UK cannot demand these rules when they themselves are amongst the large scale violators of these rules!
While this is true, I don't expect Trump to care about WTO rules. And no one will be able to do anything about it. Again.
I see you guys are planning on translating your videos to even more languages, thats cool
I'm from the UK, and I think Brexit was a mistake. I think we should come back to the EU, and I'm not the only one who wants to rejoin.
Sadly, it's not the UK's choice any more. You can prepare to join and apply to join, but the EU's nations will make the decision.
Brexit is one of the perfect example of politics over everything else. Even if unquestionable proof would show a huge trillion dollar benefit of joining back into the EU they would still not join back, cause "reasons". I have not heard one single example where the UK does better since Brexit. But watched, red multiple statistics, videos, news about how much worse they are doing...
...but for the EU it brings gifted people, money, gold, companies and fa tories and business.
Do you really think European politicians would risk that and annoy their voters by stemming that influx?
There is the fact that it must be more profitable for the EU to let the UK back....and the sum of insulty and lies thrown at the EU and its member states must be compensated for.
Boy, will that be expensive for the UK...
They should become the 51st state of the US if they hate Europe so much 😂
No thanks. Even Brexiters (Not me) said that they didn't hate Europe but did hate the European Union.
I do not want to become an American State, but most likely if that happened then the Democrats would win more elections.
we hate the us a lot more
Why are you still worried about the UK? They wanted out, so they're out.
i support this statement, the uk is on a dark path to authoritarianism
@@KwasnyyKwasny The UK currently has the weakest far right party/far left party out of every european major
@@shaaravguha3760 its not about a party being far left or far right, it is their policies, extremist parties tend to be authoritarian yes, but both labour and the conservatives are very authoritarian
6:01 Because the UK is striking so many good deals after Brexit... 🤣
bringing the UK back to the EU should be a priority during Trump years next to building a european defense
Great video
you watched that quickly ;)
I agree :)
Bro has a foresight
I like that you highlight what is your opinion and what is fact, this should be a standard.
I open the local newspaper and its full of opinions and lacking facts, while yours is the other way around.
Appreciate the comment. We are thinking of doing it like this in the future. 80% facts and if the video warrants it an opinion at the end.. but a clear indication when it is opinion.
Definitely, Britons have inventiveness and noin-othodow thinking.
The EU is a "bloc" (very pejorative). It is rather a union where countries have to accept their differences and adopt a "modus vivendi". Dull with plenty of regulations for all EU countries to be on the same pace.
A typical British attitude - like your brilliant video - is to analyse what is needed for the UK. Very intertesting but almost useless.
The UK possibilities are: (1) renegue on existing agreements like the TCA and go NO DEAL, (2) accept the existing situation and live with it, (3) make the effort to join the EU by fully complying to admission rules. There is NO OTHER WAY.
Forget about renegociating the TCA, forget about bending the EU rules, forget about having the benefits of membership while remaining outside. Again you, UK are free to do what you want and we in the EU are free to defend our rules.
So the present UK relationship with the EU is that of a third country like Zimbabwe or the USA. Why would the EU spend years of talking to a country that does not know whether it wants to be IN or OUT of the EU.
Who'd imagine trade would go down cutting ties with your greatest trading partner.
Good video please keep making them, hopefully by next election enough people will demand to be back in the EU. Young voters need to demand it
For a moment, at the start 0:07 I thought the second super giant was Ireland
Brexit was so stupid
Students from both sides will benefit massively from the UK rejoining the Single market.
I love your channel, you give us the facts and always state when its "in my opinion", separating the facts from your opinion and the visuals are very good too.
thanks for the nice comment and I am happy to hear you enjoyed the video :)
Excellent analysis as always!
Shame that my country is so stubborn and ignorant.
I love how the title assumes that Brexit wasn't already a wreck even without Trump😂 I said it 8 years ago, and i'm still saying it now: it makes zero sense to dump our largest (by a wide margin) and geographically closest trading partner so that we can instead have a ton of small and separate deals that don't benefit us as much. Brexit has been a disaster, as anyone with half a brain knew it was going to be. Trump or no Trump, it's time the UK stopped following the US around like a lost puppy and actually got some backbone and rejected that ultra-capitalist hellscape. I anxiously await the day the British public elect a party that is willing to do what is best for the country and not just what will guarantee them a job at the next election.
A point of frustration in Britain-and for me, a staunch Europhile-is just what you said at 9:27: the E.U. is _working_ on these agreements. Less than half are done deals. Why? Well, the Mercosur negotiations of 2022 come to mind. Every E.U. member was happy…except France, who proceeded to torpedo the whole affair. National vetos continue to hamstring the bloc at every turn.
The E.U. needs to find a way to end the veto while giving individual member states sufficient internal sovereignty to keep them in the bloc. Your recent suggestion of a Swiss-style federation could be a good start. The Swiss federal government sets trade, foreign, and military policy, but Swiss Kantons retain control over most domestic affairs. They even retain partial control over immigration policy: Kantons can veto visa applications and can set bespoke citizenship requirements. Even the Orbans and Le Pens of Europe might find it hard to refuse that offer.
just make it so a veto makes a country not enact the law that is being shown
I definetely can subscribe to a swiss model
The Swiss model is pretty much the EU, except that in the EU Individual countries set military and foreign policy. All EU nations have control over their domestic affairs, and individual nations set their own visa requirements and have bespoke citizenship requirements.
I think Brexit poisoned the discussion about EU in GB. I mean while there were a lot of experts warning about Brexit, it happened precisely because the Brits (or more precisely: some Brits) ignored them. How can the government justify going back on that?
While I suppose that this will improve, in the end, the Brits have to decide where they will go.
Among the public it is essentially a settled issue that If we can we should go back into the EU, over 80% of Brits (including me) think we should, it's just our extremely unrepresentative government that is ruling it out
@@itszealous1400 I guess you know it better than me as a non-British guy
It’s more like 58:42 rejoin:stay out but that’s without going into the details of what it would mean.
When you get a bit more granular and ask how they would vote if rejoining meant we would have to accept the euro it becomes anything from a tie to 45:55 rejoin:stay out.
I’m not sure where any poll that says 80% came from but there’s very few issues where 80%+ of the public agree and brexit certainly isn’t one of them
@@nareik00 No matter what, article 49 and Copenhagen criteria. No funny deals. You are a third country, and the EU is not in the habit of giving them presents, which, in this case would not be deserved anyway.
Obviously Trump will slap stupid tariffs on imports of any product containing,aided or built using Chinese goods wherever it's made.. that includes Britain.
He did not narrow it down to china, did he now? Britain will have to work with all those tariffs and have no leverage to fight back. The EU has.
Time for the British PM to get on his knees and beg America to become a State 😂😂
Well if they come back it would be, lets put it like this, hilarious.😂😂
They can eat the humbe pie and keep it too, for seconds.
AMERICA FIRST thanks to Trump and Nigel Farridge.
The U.K. is a European country and should be integrated with the rest of Europe, which they do wandering the world alone.
Its not just the UK, The UK gets all the Euroskeptic labeling but there are many many in the EU that don't agree with everything Denmark, Iceland, Norway, Switerland etc and even germany, Italy and Greece to a lesser extent. Its equally false to say its only the UK, Ireland isn't in all of the EU structures either not apart of Schengen I believe.
@@spacetime3 Nothing wrong with being sceptical. The EU isn't perfect and will always be a work in progress. But change is achieved from within, and not by leaving.
@@maartenaalsmeerThe UK had to leave. The eu is ran like a big Germany. The UK is no better being ran like a neo feudal system. The UK is military weak against Russia. Even America dare not mess with Russia directly. Either way the Uk and the eu should find some common ground for the young on cultural exchanges.
@@colinsmith1288 _The UK is no better being ran like a neo feudal system_ The UK *is* a neo-feudal system: unelected House of Lords, archaic FPTP voting system, no written constitution and a monarch as both leader of the country and the church. I'm not sure what point (if any) you're trying to make? The UK *had* to leave? OK, fine by me.
about the brexit : Truth is , the game was rigged from the start .
100%
No,that was already wrecked from day one
😂😂😂😂
Starmer is incapable of even conceiving noticeable policy movement. Nobody will ever take him seriously. Even an idiot like Johnson would be a better fit - he wouldn't even read what he's signing like last time.
We the citizens of EU should have a referendum on if we are going to accept them back. And then just vote no. That will be a nice response to their Brexit.
Are you really going to vote against allowing Britain to rejoin the EU just based on disliking us? Remember, even if there is a nationalist problem in Britain, I have 2 responses if that is what you think: 1. Preventing Britain from rejoining the EU would not help make Britain a more progressive country, it would only confirm pre-existing beliefs about nationalism. 2. Many EU members also have their own far right nationalist problems and you probably know it, it would therefore be wrong to say Britain is bad but the rest of Europe is perfect.
@@Worldmisery We don't dislike you lol. But it would be deserved to say no to you. You took this decision listening the dumber people in your society and now you have the audacity to want to revert it.
@@Worldmisery i don't mind a sane amount of nationalism, but i don't like when there is no understanding about "team effort, compromises and benefits". we have enough euroskeptics of our own and hopefully they will remain small enough to encourage necessary reformation, even though its getting very challenging lately.
in this scenario, the uk is a good example why going alone is worse. personally i'd vote for rejoin on our side, with or without the euro, but for now, thanks for the sacrifice i guess.
@@Pachi9- No you're wrong. I never took this decision because I was too young to vote in the 2016 referendum. You are therefore judging me based on what older voters chose to do nearly 10 years ago. If you are not forgiving of bad choices made even in the recent past then the problem I think is that you aren't progressive enough to respect other nations, even when it is in the interests of the EU as a whole.
@@Worldmisery How is it possible that UK always need to be forgiven for shit they 've done. If it was any other country I would be ok. But it's really annoying. Plus there are many reasons to not take them back.
when the ussr broke up, yeltsin said this phrase: "take as much sovereignty as you can carry". sovereignty means little when you're small, alone, dispensable or even of little relevance.
who would listen to ones terms and requirements, to ones needs at the negotiating table against giants? what is a mouse's sovereignty when negotiating with elephants?
immigration, islamophobia, etc are all debatable topics, but the fundamental thing is that a united team working on common interests is stronger and can bring real sovereignty when dealing with greater actors on the geopolitical scene than going at it alone with separate deals.
Brexit was MADNESS, it always will be, now must be the time to reverse it.
It will: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potential_re-accession_of_the_United_Kingdom_to_the_European_Union
The EU helpfully wrote down in article 49 and Copenhagen criteria how and what you have to do.
No negotiations, take it or stay out.
Ah yes, countries you insulted can veto the ascension.
Do not give them anything for free. They wanted to be alone, we should let them. If they wanna come back they can, but only after they adopt Euro and list of other agreements to ensure harder decupling in the future. We are either in it together or not at all.
I'm British, it has been clear that Brexit was an awful idea since before the vote. It is also true that we put ourselves in this mess, and we will never get our old deal back. Equally, it's not right to act as if we offer nothing and we should stay out because we just mean trouble, as a minority seem to accross the Internet and in this comment section. As was mentioned in the video, it can only benefit both sides if we align closer (the UK is Europe's second largest economy after all). If the cause of Brexit was lies and division spread by Nigel Farage and his people, surley hit helps nothing to approach any attempt at building back relations with a similar attitude on either side. Although i'm sure a lot of the negative comments are just Russian bots trying to make the West weaker
Nope, I am German, and the many ways in which the comments here suggest the UK must get a special deal are appalling. You are a random third country, and you are free to use article 49 and fulfill Copenhagen criteria to apply.
But the continual suggestion that the UK would be a "special" candidate that "surely" gets better conditions makes me think, you are still on your old cherry picking ways.
That is why we think you should be kept out until you lose that arrogance and entitlement.
We don't want uk in.
Saying as Polish conservative.
lol you dont even realise the UK lobbied for you to enter the EU people forget this Euros don't even know there own history.
@spacetime3 and they lobbied to leave lol.
Also Germans were most pro expansion to earn new markets.
About history, UK was always against Poland you silly.
is Poland doing well economically lately.. with the UK, it would do better ... is not about being conservative ... it's about trading
@@pep-qewThe UK opened up it's borders to Poland when some eu countries would not. So be grateful.
@@colinsmith1288 Schengen, ever heard about it?
There is nothing Poland can be grateful about.
Great video!
I honestly think that if we had a government that was really trying to get back in we could manage it in less than a decade, almost every structure, even schengen, is supported by the majority of our population, and even the euro wouldn't be an issue, becuase every new member is given 5 to 10 years to adopt it, easily enough time to swing the publics opinion, we even retain most regulations and laws being in line with eu standards.
But getting back into the EU doesn't just happen because the UK and its citizens want it to happen. It only happens when the 27 EU member states also want it to happen.
The Euro adoption would be very very tricky.
If we ignore for a second that it is a failing currency (one of the reasons we left the EU in the first place, their common market is just as much of a poison as it is a benefit), the pound is a thing of national pride. It'll not be abandoned anytime soon. (plus it's actually doing well right now which is more then I can say for the euro)
Ha-ah! EU dont want UK back! This is insane
Just invite them back...
@@TheTiagoMoutinho why? We have enough trouble as it is.
Thank you
Euro €, 40 years no leave, metric system, driving on the right and building your HSR and you are allowed back in.
You can take you time with the right side driving, but about the rest we don't talk.
Aside from the right side of the road which would be actually impossible to do, and the high speed rail that we really don't have the money for right now but we can definitely do in the future, that sounds pretty reasonable, also the 40 years without leaving isn't necessary, the collective British psyche has been scarred by Brexit, and if we rejoined we would be one of the most pro EU countries in the union
@@itszealous1400 Sweden switched sides from left hand traffic to right in the sixties. Granted it took most of an afternoon but in the end it worked.
@@itszealous1400 tthe issue of the wembly goal must be settled.. *G*
@@Pouncer9000 Yeah, but half of the UK would still drive on the wrong side, just to show the furriners...*sigh*
You just can't heal stupid.
I miss the brits. Hope they are figuring it out somehow...
Absolutely. But I miss the level headed Brits of the seventies, not the loony tunes patrol they are now...
Labour does want to re-join, It's just that their hands are tied because they pledged during the election not to re-join anything. And the only reason they did that was to try to appeal to as many people as they could after being out of power for 14 years.
I feel like Labour want to merely for now set the groundwork for re-joining by signing up to bits and pieces here and there. And then maybe during the next election if they win, they might be more open to it.
It does not matter what the UK does or wants. The EU decides. And you are not even halfway through the requirements for that...
@@RealMash I never said the UK gets to ultimately decide.
Idk. I think Trump really doesn't like the EU. He'd want Brexit to succeed.
Lol, don't try to get inside Trump's head, it's not a good place..
imho Trump only cares about money and power. He will always prefer trade with the E.U. over GB. Also, brexit can never be a success because all over the world and history successful neighbouring countries were and are those who trade the most with each other certainly when one is much smaler then the other.
He wants to have his cake and eat it. Loot the nhs and impoverish the average brit, to create a couple of new US billionaires. And drive a wedge between the UK and EU. If the torries are in charge they'd do it too. Impoverish thr nation as a whole, just as long as they and their oligarch friends, get their cut.
America is owned by the tribe, and they don't like Europe. European countries need to stick together now more than ever.
@@Pouncer9000 I'm not one, but world leader's and analysts can't afford not to try to get into Trump's head right now.
And this very video makes assumptions on what's going on inside his head.
Imagine a substance as ancient as the fires of Sinai, an elixir that transcends centuries, carrying within it both the power to heal and the force to reveal. This is no mere balm but a sacred oil-the chrism, veiled in mystery, woven with threads of the miraculous. To touch it is to approach the holy, to be marked as one set apart. Once, it was the pride of Israel, held in reverence by a people who saw within its touch the promise of wholeness and truth. Now, against the odds and far from its homeland, its essence stirs again-not in Judea, but in the lands of Polin, where the prayers and songs of the Jewish people took root, flourishing over a thousand years.
This is no fantastical draught from children’s tales of sorcery; it is real, potent beyond the imaginings of any bard. Sara Benet, a scholar with Jewish blood and Polish soul, unearthed a secret long buried under the dust of centuries. The mysterious “kaneh-bosm” of the Bible, mistranslated and misunderstood as “calamus,” was in fact the sacred Cannabis. With this revelation, the recipe for the chrism oil was born anew, a potion once known only to prophets and priests. Its purpose? Not merely to heal, though heal it may, but to expose, to burn away the veil between soul and body. On healthy flesh, it rests benignly; but on those weighted by hidden sins, it ignites-a searing fire, a divine reckoning, warning of the darkness festering within.
In ancient days, this oil was not for the common folk. Only kings and priests dared anoint themselves with it, and its fiery power was a test for the spirit. Any unworthy soul would cry out under its touch, sins laid bare in agony and light. The chrism oil did not simply soothe; it searched the heart, lifting away the facades, following the threads of remorse and guilt woven deeply into sinew and marrow. It demanded purity, separating those destined for greatness from those left chained to their failings.
Chrism oil may sometimes be a cure, but it is always a revealer. It illuminates the hidden places where sins fester, where burdens lie waiting to break forth into affliction if left unchecked.
And now Poland, a land molded by suffering and strength, has become the unlikely cradle of this rediscovery. Here, in this soil layered with the resilience of centuries, the ancient blend breathes again. In my own research, from the hallowed halls of Stanford to remote places of healing, I have sought to comprehend its power-not as a relic, but as a bridge between body and spirit, a means to glimpse the mysteries that lie beyond the surface. This oil can be created by your own hands, yet it demands reverence, caution, and the courage to face what lies hidden within.
If you feel the call to step beyond the bounds of the ordinary, to welcome this potent ancient elixir into your life, then I invite you to explore further. “The Secret of the Chrism Oil,” now on Amazon, awaits those ready to encounter healing and the secrets of the soul.
Exodus 30, 22-33
www.amazon.com/Secret-Chrism-Oil-Slawek-Wojtowicz/dp/B0CDNKS8K6/?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_w=JdEs9&content-id=amzn1.sym.9f654aa3-75f1-42ea-bb2c-1136f91b121f&pf_rd_p=9f654aa3-75f1-42ea-bb2c-1136f91b121f&pf_rd_r=136-3698562-9391347&pd_rd_wg=fB7KZ&pd_rd_r=187e0701-5967-4097-b955-bd24cbf25b00&ref_=aufs_ap_sc_dsk
Uk is not united anymore
Brexit mess
What about an EU-Swiss style policy for the UK?
You’d have to take the freedoms too and according to the arguments to leave. They wanted to control immigration.
@@FenryrGrey since Brexit immigration has hit 750,000 per year and the whole country knows this, it pretty settled that Brexit didn't do shit to stop immigration
_What about an EU-Swiss style policy for the UK_ Not available for the UK. The EU stated numerous times that it doesn't want any other Swiss-style deals.
The UK is not like the Swiss Confederation. Neither politically, geographically, economically, or historically ... The UK is also not bound to the absolute neutrality of the Swiss, instead it's part of NATO ... The deals between Switzerland and the EU are very specific, and complicated, none of this could even be applicable with the UK ...
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸♥️♥️♥️🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
WE LOVE UK♥️♥️♥️
I think UK need to be k without an u, so England and whales could keep their pride and the rest rejoin the EU
This is incorrect. American consumers have far more purchasing power than European consumers do. This is why Europe is already reliant on exports - average Europeans don't have the fiscal space to buy what is currently being produced in Europe. It is wholly unrealistic to expect Europe to absorb the exports currently going to the US.
That isn't what's important here, it's that we have triple the trade with the EU than we do with the US and whichever side we side with, the other is going to tariff us, large scale EU tariffs would be a disaster
@itszealous1400 that's true. I'm disagreeing with the video. He's suggesting the UK can simply transfer its US trade to the EU, which is a fantasy at best and completely delusional at worst.
@@jeffmorris5802Bro is normal american who thinks Texas can single handedly defeat all of Europe 💀
@@TXOACLpresident ... what?
look at the total numbers, they count
I believe Trump is planing a brexit in Usa
No Marjory Taylor Greene is...bit of a break up...
Joining the customs union is just going to make brexit look like a massive loss. Just about all the 'freedoms' they get from leaving are being free from these regulations. If they join the customs union they will be stuck with all the 'problems' they had while being a member, but without any say on what happens in the eu
It won't "look" like a massive loss, it already is a massive loss & it'd simply be accepting the reality that it indeed was a massive loss.
The Customs Union is only available for EU and EFTA members. The UK is neither. EFTA-membership will be vetoed by members Iceland and Norway. No cherry-picking options available for the UK.
Not that big of a deal tbh
The UK is going to do what they always do: try to have their cake and eat it too, but this time they’ll end up without the American trade deal and outside of the EU. America doesn’t need the UK, nor does the EU, while the UK could use any help they can get
Some 800 billion pounds of trade between the Uk and the eu are done. So your claim is wrong.
@ that represents about 50% of all the trade that the UK does, now look for the percentage it represents for the total EU foreign trade, that should give you a clue of whom needs who the most.
@@didixtar2863 Trade with the EU is 40% of the UKs exports and a bit less then 50% of its imports.
the UK makes up around 15% of the EUs total exports.
It'll be a bigger hit to the UK if relations collapse but both sides will suffer greatly either way.
@@shaaravguha3760 Last time France alone closed the border the UK crawled to the negotiation table after three days and did what was requested.
That makes quite sure who has the upper hand here.
no.
Yes lol 😂
!!I recently sold some of my long-term position and currently sitting on about 350k, do you think Nvidia is a good buy right now or I have I missed out on a crucial buy period, any good stock recommendation on great performing stocks will be appreciated.
As a newbie investor, it’s essential for you to have a mentor to keep you accountable.
Ruth Ann Tsakonas is my trade analyst, she has guided me to identify key market trends, pinpointed strategic entry points, and provided risk assessments, ensuring my trades decisions align with market dynamics for optimal returns.
I managed to grow a nest egg of around 120k to over a Million. I'm especially grateful to Adviser Ruth Ann Tsakonas, for her expertise and exposure to different areas of the market..
I don't really blame people who panic. Lack of
information can be a big hurdle. I've been
making more than $200k passively by just
investing through an advisor, and I don't have
to do much work.. Inflation or no inflation, my
finances remain secure. So I really don't blame
people who panic.
Without a doubt! Ruth Ann Tsakonas is a trader who goes above and beyond. she has an exceptional skill for analysing market movements and spotting profitable opportunities. Her strategies are meticulously crafted on thorough research and years of practical experience.
how would you recommend i enter the crypto market? I am also looking at studying some traders and copying their strategy rather than investing myself and losing money emotionally.. What's your take on this approach? and How can i reach her, if you don't mind me asking?
For the algorythm!
Für Rum und Ähre!
Joining the customs union is politically tricky. A lot of brexit voters voted tory in 2019 and then labour in 2024. Labour cannot win without these voters.
they have already lost them if you look at the polls its neck and neck
There are no obvious benefits in joining the CU, especially without a voice
What does that prove other than nothing? It just means that if the Labour Party wants to reverse Brexit because many of its voters want it, then other voters will vote for an awful idea by voting for an awful party like the Tories or Reform UK.
I was too young to vote in 2016, so it's not actually my referendum. If I can't vote to rejoin the EU just because older voters don't think I should be allowed to vote, then the UK is not a democracy.
@@Worldmisery if labour unilaterally entered the customs union then that would almost certainly mean a Tory government and kemi badenoch as PM by 2029. Idk about you but I'll take starmerism any day over that
@@oliverkerins5628 No all of that is wrong.
Public opinion is changing towards the EU. The British public has become less pro-Brexit. In fact some polls even suggest that if there was another referendum then Britain would actually vote to rejoin the EU.
If you're really worried about the the Tories, then read this. The Tories are becoming less relevant because Reform UK is growing. Brexit voters won't vote Tory because everyone is fed up of them after 14 years of uselessness. In fact if they don't recover in the next election then they might never be relevant ever again.
The only real reason you have to disagree with me is because you are Pro-Brexit.
Hes a moron
Hope so, we need the uk and they need us
Nope, we don't. All we need we are getting anyways. The UK on the other hand...
Trump's ppl did say the UK can have exemptions
And you trust them? How stupid are you? You might be leaving the biggest trading block in the world next ..
*crickets*
Well, you might believe them, then... *sigh*
You must ask why we left in the first place! It's a bit like getting back with your ex after a divorce; there's a lot of baggage with the EU
That's ridiculous. If all you have is bad analogies then you don't actually have a point.
Also what baggage did you have the EU other than wanting to break international law and discriminate against minorities?
@@Worldmisery The baggage is thousands of laws which we are still trying to change now! For me the EU means control not trade!
@@cooldad4 Oh no. Not this again.
Many EU laws are actually better because they are intended to protect our human rights and democracy, these are the exact laws that the Tories removed and replaced with other laws so that they could undermine our democracy.
You can't even name one of these laws that you think we should remove.
@@Worldmisery In fact it was the transparency initiative. They wanted to prevent their dirty deals become visible. All the rest was jsut smole and mirrors and for the birds to make the populace vote against its own interest.
*GET REKT!!!* 💪🇺🇲💪🇺🇲💪🇺🇲
Say it louder. You might make more of us oppose you which is exactly what I want to happen.
Menuda almendra te gastas, colega.
Would be cool, always neato to have the UK back
Not the current basket case, no. This is not the level headed Brits from the seventies, those are complete cuckoo now. Keep them out until they sober up!
EU trade agreements have completely stalled, like its economy which was the same size as the US in 2008, now its half the size. Reducing the over regualtion is the best way to grow the UK economy and make its industries more competitive on the world stage.
the way brexit was done was bad, not the idea itself, the parties in the uk are more authoritarian than the eu
I sure hope so lmao
Absolute fantasy. The UK will benefit a lot from the current situation.
The current situation favors the country that can handle the EU's bureaucracy for the US.
Aside from the UK, there are 2 candidates for that position. Denmark and the Netherlands.
Solution : EEA
Not available. Solution is the one you have, the TCA
Are you sure US tariffs will apply not only to goods but to services as well?
I have my doubts about that.
If it helps get the US grubby hands on the NHS, they will put tariffs on services ;-)
I would like to see the UK back in the EU. And I'd love to see Norway and Iceland here too. That is the most rational thing to do.
Then we can give the middle finger to 'Murica, China and Russia. We have the potential to be our own superpower.
That sounds fantastic, how's it going to happen
Ah yes, overturning a democratic vote. Authoritarian UK has no problem with this of course 😄
They overturned the vote from the seventies already so...there is precedent ;-)
It's all well and good having opinions on brexit, but that's all they can be, opinions. There is no way to determine whether or not brexit was a good or bad thing in the long running of the UK until they start teaching about it in history lessons. In the short term, it appears negative, but that was to be expected by everyone, even many brexiters, whether or not it was a good decision has yet to be proven because it's the long term that matters at the end of the day.
I don't want to wait 50 years for stupid nasty arrogant far right uneducated horrible people to admit that Brexit was a bad decision.
Good god, you are not serious? Anything good can develop out of anything someday! Doesn't make it better now. The numbers tell a pretty surefire way that it was a horrible decision
People keep talking about the UK needing the EU vice versa etc etc.
Most nations aren't a part of a massive supranational trading bloc, much less one that incorporates political union, and they're doing just fine, I live in such a country.
It's a big world out there, and most people get around it just fine.
(This is to all the Europeans who think the EU is the peak model AND to the Brexiteers who swear it's the death of mankind)
I don't think so ... that's why we have the Bric coming up
@@xoagig BRICS will never work as long as india and China are both in it, one of them needs to go since they can't get along. India is doing everything in its power to stop chinese firms from selling in india, why would they endorse a common market.
@@xoagigWhat's the "bric" ?
Trump has already been talking about exemptions to the U.K. It's not "highly likely" that he will impose severe tariffs. Trump SUPPORTED Brexit in 2016. Your video title is click bait.
if there is excemptions on the UK but not the EU, the EU could impose punishment tarifs on the UK as a counter measure
@@gawkthimm6030 No they won't. The EU and the UK have good relations, the UK striking a good trade deal won't cause the EU to give them harsher conditions, these are large countries not little children.
single market
Not available to the UK. Eu said so.
noo thank just be solo don t back you eco is bad so bad lol
Im sorry, while i love the channel, finding out your videos are just AI generated did not just make me lose all trust in the information, but also all desire to watch 😕
Good luck in your future yt endeavors...
the videos aren't AI generated. In fact we take hours upon hours creating these videos.
@@EUMadeSimple I'm confused, do you actually use generative AI for content creation, because it looked and sounded more like a joke ?
I mean Mexican Army parade at 3:00, inane commentary and a fucking baguette in the few seconds you (pretend?) to present French politics?
Why would we want another woke state? Give us west Balkan states + Turkey over GB any day!
So many things would have to change to enter Europe... starting with human rights.. no going to happen
both have human rights abuses so no one should join
Your more than welcome to them.