ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 มี.ค. 2017
- ►Review: wasd.ro/hardware-reviews/3d-v...
RAW Files here: RAW files here: wasd.ro/editorials/slow-motio...
Filmed with Sony RX10 II
►Review-uri din tech si gaming: wasd.ro
❤️Pentru a ramane conectat la video-urile WASD aboneaza-te la: bit.ly/34z8CFi
📣Reducere la orice de pe PC Garage cu codul de Voucher: MTJ9UUUU
Scrie-mi la adresa:
►fulger@wasd.ro
Social:
►Instagram: / wasd.ro
►Twitter: / wasdro
►Facebook: / wasd.ro - เกม
Hey! 360 Hz slomo video up! Check it!
th-cam.com/video/4-owPNqwxMo/w-d-xo.html
Hows this work?
My msi laptop is about 144hz but when i play LOL its fps is about 240 fps
Hows that working?
@@alucardlord9032 you need to 144x240
Yeah Helps to spot enemies in advance
8gb vram
Human eye can only see 8 gb of Ram
True
LOL
Where I can download ram? Link pls
Download-ram-here-no-virus.com
@@Pepino8A fun you
**cries in 60hz**
@@dkdkdkekkddk7342 lol try to overcloack it
Ow laptop some monitors are not able to be overclocked i think you cant search it on yt
Or maybe one day i make video just so lazy 😅
*cries in 240hz to flex on other people*
But everybody still watching movies with 28 fps and say 60 fps is not good)
240Hz? Naah, I love the teleportation feature my 60Hz monitor gives me lol.
Happy 2 Trigger You
Nah his monitor uses flying raijin
Happy 2 Trigger You 🤧 I thought in was the only one that acknowledges him
Meh, I have a faster one. 30hz
Botond Bánfi 5fps
You guys have hz?
I thought that 144hz monitors were overrated and that they couldnt be that much better than 60hz so i bought one and when i started using it, i told myself "damn theres not much difference at all" and then someday after a couple of weeks of use i randomly surfed through some settings and i came across "monitor resfresh rate" and it was set at 60..
So i used a 144hz monitor set at 60hz for a couple of weeks lmfao. when i turned it to 144 the difference is like a night and day, i couldnt go back to 60hz, no way
lmao
Dude where can you find the settings?
@@screamoman6265 Nvidia control panel or advanced display settings
I got my 240hz monitor and it was the same story. Except I was aware of what my frame rate was, as my monitor has a built in frame counter.
greek did this except he had it for 3 years like that
I finally got a 144hz monitor and the difference is day and night. Even the mouse when you are on the desktop feels so much better. I still use my old monitor as a second monitor. Now when I move the mouse over to the old monitor, it feels like I'm using a broken monitor.
tell that to the others commenting on this video:))
Same
Same, 144hz is necessary to be the best at geometry dash, and i switched my monitor to 60hz a week after getting a 144hz, and its atrocious.. How did i live without 144hz?
Latios / Spearmint Oh GD
yes v much so. sub to my yt and add me "spearmint" :)
240hz is still smooth in slowmotion, Amazing!
GD Teamspectrum oh hello fellow gd players
nice to play gd
Read the edit before replying:
Geometrican the thing is we don't play in slow motion any videogame, so the benefits are non existent in more than 60hz
*EDIT* : you guys are correct no need to reply to this comment,i did not know
Also what i meant to say is that 240hz versus for example 120 or 144hz wont make much of a big deal if you dont have both monitors next to each other to notice the difference,of course.
Thats all have a nice day =D.
Jhin a blooming Flower you can definitely tell the difference between different displays when youre playing, after 144hz we dont see so much difference clearly, and bigger than 240hz would probably be pointless, mayby it doesnt affect to league of legends so much but to other games like fps it will make a huge difference
You can choose how fast slow motion is, moron.
It doesn't matter, human eyes can only smell 8 cores per second.
Leafyy but can you smell it?
@@zLeafyy Lock this guy up with the sped children
@@zLeafyy the only dumbfuck i see here is you mate
@@zLeafyy JOKE
LOL I CAN ONLY SMELL 4 PIXELS LMAO
700 hz will be perfect
Only for minecraft
It is not launch yet
Nah bro 1400 hz
Just do it the Intel way. "5ghz"
bombos and blurry
"hUMaN eyE cAN'T sEe OVeR 30 fPS"
It cant, that doesnt mean 60 fps onscreen means 60 frames the eye comprehends, that means a fraction of that is intersection, of 60 frames you probably perceive like 30, so with 60 frames refresh rate you should normally be at your max, 60+ is only glorification. you can show ppl 100 fps and 200 fps videos and 30% of them will even recognize a difference after close looking.
Salty Pulse Main 60fps, no 30fps ,30 fps is low
BiOhExEn Hernández Stupid he’s joking.
No biting the packagerino Kripperino He was joking wtf.
Idiot's like this will be dumb forever.
Now i know that my 60hz monitor belongs to Trashcan
SpawnNightking lol 😂
lol
no it dont... do you film your monitor and then play at slowmotion ? if game is smooth at 60 whats the problem than?
Slower updates, more motion blur etc
Just imagine you are aiming fast moving oponent. Sometimes he moves so fast that is not possible to draw him on slow refresh rate monitor.
"The human RAM can only eye 4000 MHz of keyboard horsepower" - Pythagoras
You mean 1600 lol
@@stellatecar7634 why 1600?
@@Simon11354 ddr3 is el sucko
@@stellatecar7634 i have 2 hz memory
@@Simon11354 that’s pretty cool
Recently jumped to a 165hz monitor after being stuck on 60hz displays my whole life. Holy moly it truly makes a difference. Once you go high refresh rate you really don't go back.
BEST AND FASTEST VID EXPLAINED Hz ON TH-cam!!!!
thanks
JimmyGunXD556 who cares?
Nobody plays in slow motion recording at 1000 fps
+eltonz no, but that isn't the point, the more hertz, the smoother it is in real time.
All u need 120 hz monitor everything above that is pointless exept for a minor group of people..
and that is why they made those monitors, not everyone needs them but some people like them.
This made me feel I needed a new monitor, then I remembered that 60fps are completely fine because this was recorded at 1000 fps
Its kinda true but remeber its smooth above 60hz . You dont need 240 hz maybe but at least 144hz to have it double smooth
Got my 144Hz monitor today, there’s a massive difference. I would definitely recommend it
@@tmacleod4616 Same , i got mine 1 week ago and its masive in compare to 60 hz. You can feel the diference even at moving windows tabs
@@tmacleod4616 lol i have 240Hz
60hz is bullsh1t, 144hz opened my eyes again 🤣
I recently upgraded to 144hz from 75hz. It initially felt somewhat smoother but when i looked at another 60hz display after getting used to 144, the 60hz felt like it was a slideshow.
Now imagine people thinking 30fps videos are better than 60fps videos😂 that‘s just because people are used to seeing slideshows! I guarantee if we would all watch 60fps videos from now on, no one could go back that fast again.
FPS and HZ matter!
@@RabbitConfirmed nah I'm good with 24fps ☺️
@@hoonigan1423 bruh, slideshow enjoyer
@@RabbitConfirmed yep got used to it
@@hoonigan1423retard
The thumbnail does the amazing work of illustration! Great work👍
GUYS ONCE YOU GO TO 120+ HZ YOU CANT GO BACK TO 60HZ EVER!! just a warning
Tan Tan i can confirm this. I tried but i couldn't give my 144hz monitor back :/
Yes. And you will turn your game settings down until you get that framerate. Even if its the lowest settings.
Tan Tan yea made that mistake when microcenter had monitors on display for people to use
Yeah just got 144hz a month ago. Had to hook my 60hz monitor back up bc i was trouble shooting something.......I will not go back.
So true. 2560x1440@165Hz .. even basic use like moving windows around is eyegasm. I remember before 2000's when people were arguing if human eye can even see difference between 30 and 60 fps. xD xD Anyway, I threw my 3840x2160 TN panel piece of shit out.. it's sitting under my desk at work and trying to pimp it for couple of hundred to anyone would would take it but I am too late.. literally everyone has wisened up. Sux. xD
Perfect video. Clearly demonstrates the difference without ample preamble. Thanks for the video!
raw footage here: wasd.ro/editorials/slow-motion-materiale-brute/
really is it true.
Repent!Jesus Saves!Read Bible God’s Word!Tut Buße!Jesus Rettet!Lese Bibel Gottes Wort!Покайтесь!Спасает Иисус!Читай Библию Слово Божье!
I haven't experienced 100Hz+ refresh rate, but when I lower my LCD screen resolution to1024x768 it can run at 75Hz I can tell the difference from 60Hz. So I guess 144Hz will be so relaxing to eyes.
found ur comment in 2022. Same, im still stuck with 60hz 18.5 LCD monitor. At 1024*768 monitor runs at 75hz. Difference is easily noticeable between 60hz and 75hz
Me too it felt pretty nice to switch from 60hz to 75hz since my monitor offers 75hz for any resolution under 1024x768
@@rennygator hi
i found out my monitor can run 1080p 75hz
and I have a 144Hz laptop now 😁 anyhow I use it at 60hz most of times in single player games
@@zenvir1680 Wow congrats for that
This video is very laggy. I'm watching on my 960Hz monitor. And my eyes and my brain are very fast, so I'm watching this world in 0.1x. And of course 960 is my IQ.
Jack Isn't Daniel's 💪👍
I bet you watch Rick & Morty
Savage! And well said :D
GTX is very outdated series, dude. I'm using intel IGX 960X gpu.
Oh my jelly!
This is stupid everyone knows the human eye can’t see beyond 2 FPS
Its ya boi Andrew Jackson I downloaded more fps to a flash drive and swallowed it so now I see at 6 fps.
I put sodium in my dickhole so now i can see 8 fps
People with glasses can see up to 22 fps because i wear glasses i should onow
People with aids see over 100fps
Peasants. I poured bleach in my eyes and now I cannot see
The human frames cannot see more than 60 eyes per second.
Xavier Xavier there's no given number your eyes can or cannot see
+Copper Penny are you sure you read that first comment correctly?
r/whoosh
The歐Boss r/ihavereddit
@@friedpilot4663 lmao
This is one of the best demonstrations I've seen. Nice and fair, no sponsored marketing bs
When 60 is already not enough but most console games still run 30
@Cody every open world game is 30fps. Games like GTA, witcher 3, god of war are all at 30fps. Multiplayer games like cod , fortnite and battlefield are barely reaching 60
@Cody they are actcually locked at 30 because they cant go higher than 30 in those games anyways only game that i know it isnt capped is fortnite
@Cody Go watch GTA5 and witcher 3 benchmarks dipshit. On console it's CAPPED at 30fps and even dips down below that
@Cody then why are you getting offended and upset? Was I wrong saying that graphically demanding games are locked at 30?
Cody none of you fuckers are poor
I'm using a 144Hz display. So 60Hz looks like 30Hz
RedRayZ no
I know this is super old but I haven't seen anyone else still play shiro neko aka white cat project.
lul
Weird flex but ok
im 240Hz, so 60 looks like 10
When you are stuck with 60hz, 60 fps looks pretty smooth and you'd want everything to be in 60 fps but then you see 120hz/144hz so then you can never call 60hz smooth again
Personally I thought that "144hz can't be THAT good", but geez, now I can't go back to 60hz. I know 240hz is better, but 144 is enough, it's cheaper and it's still smooth af.
If you would try 240hz than you wouldn't say that 144hu is enough
@@sn1per445 yeah for competitive shooters you def better off with 240 as u don't have graphics maxed nor are they as visually demanding, but for someone who plays mostly single player games 144 is nice as u can hit 120-144 fps with high /ultra graphics & still have super smooth image.
Especially if u coming from 60hz like me ha.
@@tyguy3876 me playing Cod on ps4 60 FPS... Still Good
Great review !
What a great way to show the difference! I'm currently running on 60 Hx screens and have always felt like it was lagging. This explains why it feels that way! My next monitor will definitely be 120Hz or higher.
@Clean Gameplay I did! It's a world of a difference!
Full hz breakdown:
I will denote something I am coining 'frames per reaction', which is the number of frames you will see before you process and execute a given action assuming an average reaction time of 250 ms (as studies show this to be the average reaction time of a human, and some online testing shows that average gamers are anywhere from 190 to 300 ms per reaction). The different hz rates will also be listed in accordance with this.
Note: I omitted 75 hz because very few games and gamers use it at all; however, 75 hz would be the cut-off point for most gaming because that's about how long it takes the human brain to process an entire image according to MIT testing (13.3 milliseconds). This is most likely where the myth came from that the human brain is capped at 60 hz (hence why 60 hz has been the standard for decades). In theory, that means you cannot actively use post-75 hz, though post-75 hz is still useful because video games deal in real-time rendering of many continuous frames/images, not just one image (I will mention the upper-limit of this, as well). (165 hz also exists, and Sony spoke of running some games at 90 at 4k on PS5 for smoother gameplay compared to 120.)
30 hz = 33.3 milliseconds for frame-generation (playable for typical gaming at non-pro level, but bad for pros/first-person shooters, and not ideal for simracing). 7.5 frames per reaction.
60 hz = 16.6 ms (good for all gaming, other than pros/first-person shooters). 15 frames per reaction.
120 hz = 8.3 ms (cut-off point for pro-gaming and simracing, etc.). 30 frames per reaction.
144 hz = 6.9 ms (slightly better than 120 hz). 36 frames per reaction.
240 hz = 4.1 ms (max pro-level first-person shooter gaming, and not much improvement for other gaming -- and massive cost/hardware drain). 61 frames per reaction.
360 hz = 2.7 ms (cutting-edge monitor hz as of 2021, but not really playable yet. Only slightly better than 240 hz, and not worth it for non-pros or normal games). 92 frames per reaction.
720 hz = 1.3 ms (may exist by 2024 or so, as we will already see 480 hz monitors by 2022-2023). 192 frames per reaction.
1000 hz = 1 ms (may be the upper-limit. I saw a report claiming that 1000 hz monitors will exist by 2025). 250 frames per reaction (perfect 1:1 mapping of frames per millisecond of reaction time, with post-1000 hz being sub-1 ms frame-generation, which is most likely useless, since the brain cannot process faster than 1 ms at all). (I will also add the upper-limit of the brain is 1000 FPS (since this is the limit at which your myelinated nerves can fire), but subjects can really only process to 200 FPS, which is akin to real-life motion, according to some experts.)
This was a fantastic representation. Thank you.
wow i love you sir :D , absolutely subscribed
I read that experts claim around 250 hz is akin to real-life motion, which tells me ALL post-240 hz will be smooth even at slow-motion. That means, all post-240 offer very MINOR improvement to gameplay, as some test subjects already report on the 360 hz gaming monitor. The frame-to-frame times prove this, as well. Of course, in reality, 120 hz is very smooth in real-time, and is more than good enough for non-pro simracing, and even non-pro first-person shooters. The cut-off point is about 120 hz as this is about 8 ms frame-to-frame, which is deemed the ideal range for response time (hence why all modern monitors and TVs are anywhere from 1 to 8 ms rt), since it's difficult for the brain to even process an image faster than this (MIT testing showed that a human brain can process an entire image in 13.3 ms (equal to 75 hz)). It also creates smoothness and removes 'ghosting'. The biggest advantage to higher hz is not time, but smoothness (though there is also a big time advantage comparing 60 to 240 hz). But, 60 to 120 hz is fairly minor, as is 144 to 240 hz. 30 to 60 hz is a larger jump, as it happens. Some testing shows that 60 to 144 hz saves 1.2 second on lap time (which equates to 9.7 ms more time frame-to-frame and 21 extra frames, which is not a massive jump, but is notable and large).
Context:
An 8-hour test from the website, Overtake, reported that Joe (the editor) saw some minor racing improvements and saved 1.2 seconds off his lap from 60 to 144 hz (a fair difference of 9.7 milliseconds). We can roughly break that logic down (if we take Joe, the editor, as a rough gauge, and his 8-hour test as decent sampling. This was on ACC):
*Assuming around 1 millisecond saves 0.2 seconds on lap time from Joe's baseline lap. (I also added the additional frames per reaction for each comparison.) Bold show the common jumps, so you can easily compare them. Fewer extra frames at lower hz jumps makes more difference than many extra frames at higher hz jumps (even if they are larger jumps). Very much worth keeping in mind in the context of 120 to 240, and future hz.
30 to 360 hz would save 5.5 s on lap time (30.6 ms of difference). 84.5 extra FPR [additional frames per reaction at 250 ms per reaction].
30 to 240 hz would save 5.2 s on lap time (29.2 ms of difference). 53.5 extra FPR.
30 to 144 hz would save 4.7 s on lap time (26.4 ms of difference). 28.5 extra FPR.
30 to 120 hz would save 4.4 s on lap time (25 ms of difference). 22.5 extra FPR.
30 to 60 hz would save 2.8 s on lap time (16.7 ms of difference). 7.5 extra FPR.
60 to 360 hz would save 2.1 s on lap time (13.9 ms of difference). 77 extra FPR.
60 to 240 hz would save 1.8 s on lap time (12.5 ms of difference). 46 extra FPR.
*60 to 144 hz saved Joe 1.2 s on lap time (9.7 ms of difference). 21 extra FPR.
60 to 120 hz would save 1 s on lap time (8.3 ms of difference). 15 extra FPR.
120 to 360 hz would save 1.1 s on lap time (5.6 ms of difference). 62 extra FPR.
144 to 360 hz would save 0.8 s on lap time (4.2 ms of difference). 56 extra FPR.
120 to 240 hz would save 0.8 s on lap time (4.2 ms of difference). 31 extra FPR.
144 to 240 hz would save 0.5 s on lap time (2.8 ms of difference). 25 extra FPR.
240 to 360 hz would save 0.3 s on lap time (1.4 ms of difference). 31 extra FPR.
120 to 144 hz would save 0.3 s on lap time (1.4 ms of difference). 6 extra FPR.
FUN FACT: MOST OF US WATCHING IN 60 HZ SCREEN
Can confirm
Na, my phone is 120hz, laptop 240hz, desktop 240hz, TV 120hz, secondary monitor 240hz, spare monitors 144hz and 165hz etc
Thanks for the comparison!
I find it funny that a goal of this decade is to make games look super realistic, yet when it comes to real-life fluidity nobody cares.
Then you don't understand why games exist from the very beginning.
8cow
If you're gonna say "because videogames aren't real life", the same statement could be implied when talking about realistic graphics.
Competitive gamers often do care. I remember playing at LAN parties in the early 2000's and fast CRTs were the thing. You could put some of them up to 150hz, but at only 1024x768. For the time, that was a good resolution, considering how slow GPUs were. Back then, there were a lot of people repeating the meme that you can't see more than X frames per second or that it was just a superficial thing, not affecting pleasure or gamer performance. Now it's no uphill battle to convince most people of the value of it. It amazed me how long it took for manufacturers to increase the refresh rate of LCDs considering the value that competitive gamers get from faster refresh rates.
i played cs 1.5 & 1.6 on a crt with 800+600p
i remember that the monitor i had could hit way over 100hz and i turned everything in the game down what sucks frames.
and i always had the biggest monitor on the lan partys, it was, if i remember right 21".
we all played with at least 100fps. if you did not, you got killed and called everybody cheater. :D thats the same guys who say you can't see more then xy fps ...
Because real-life fluidity requires a whole lot more straightforward GPU power than to make it look prettier. That, plus for the longest time LCD tech just wasn't available to do it. The transition from CRT to LCD took a very long time. Even now CRTs have some advantages over LCD, although they've finally lost out on resolution ever since the 4k monitors came out.
I feel like if some companies kept investing in CRT we'd have some pretty awesome monitors to compete with LCDs. Problem is they're more polluting, hard to ship, and potentially more expensive.
eh, 144hz is more than good enough.
TeqHDcasper *looks at bank account*
Yes... D e f i n i t l y ...
That's what you said about 60Hz 5 years ago. I agree 144Hz is enough, but I can admit that most liekly after getting used to 240Hz I would say 144Hz is not enough.
in some situation 144hz seemed far superior to 120 hz (for me...)
but i doubt many people will go for 240 hz. i think 2k with 120hz >>> 1080p with 240hz (i think nearly same hardware is needed to play on these settings)
in the near future i cant imaginge there will be more 240hz monitors. perhaps when everybody has 4k monitor at home they start going for over 144/165 hz
(dunno if this will be in 5 years)
if my computer would run it i would prefer 4k with 120hz to 2k with 240hz too...
ps i think in WoW (or games like that) even a 4k 60hz will be far superior to a 1080p 240hz.
pps console nubs say 20-30 hz are more than enough :P
new mmo's are more like fighting games, so ur better off with a high refresh rate monitor, but 240hz is overkill, even if u can see a little difference, u can't react faster, best bet is 100-144hz of whatever resolution u can afford, since all games have supersampling options and thats good enough, otherwise u'd pay out the ass right now, since most 4k monitors that are cheaper suck and gpu prices are too high
99% of pple aren't even good enough at gaming to even need above 60hz though
Nothing in this world is ever good enough. :) I can remember when people said you would NEVER need more than a few MBs of ram....
Excellent video editing.
When I play in my laptop it doesn't show fps it feels like a slide show
2 FPS
💀💀💀 F
@@eeriemyxi 2 seconds per frame
144 Hz is like the Smooth Spot.
Furthermore you can overclock your display. Sometimes you will even reach up to 200hz!
So if you don't wanna spend 500$ for 240hz, go with 144hz and overclock !
byBono Yeah, and have it last a couple months
The Pushing Terapolygon Dude, i dont own a 144hz Monitor..
I have a 5 Year old 16:10 Samsung Monitor with 60hz...
I am just saying, if u have the money go for a 240hz Monitor, but the best you can get for less money is a 144h Monitor.
byBono I actually got my TV to run 120hz progressive. Then, I tried 240hz interlaced... The refresh rate was amazing if you ignore the severe color and pixel artifacts haha...
you can buy a 240 hertz monitor with free-sync and a sub 1 millisecond response time for around $400
Now I don’t want anything else than 240 hz
Jose Díaz except 1000hz
Jose Díaz 256hz?
Darnell Davis You're an idiot
@Darnell Uhhh, the 240 hz cake is real, GLaDOS.
The movie addict The movie addict what a smart person
This is a much better video comparison.
just straight to the point no bs
Now imagine watching porn at that refresh rate...
😂😂
LOL
🙄... of course... who would have even dreamed of that statement
99.99% of porn doesn’t go above 60fps so It won’t make a difference
(Don’t “wOoOOosh” me you fucking 11 year olds. I know he was joking.)
Elijah D You have to say 🛡R/WOOSH SHILED🛡
My experience switching from 60hz to 240hz its not even night and day.. it's spring and winter..
When youre used to 120 hz when u try 60hz youll be like wtf so laggy
good to know we got all the fps experts on the hunt.
My rog phone 5 has been set to 144hz but the fps when i play game is just 60 fps, hows that?
Does the 144hz refresh rate works on 60 fps? Or it should supposed to be 144 fps?
In the last test where it was shooting bullets, the 240hz was clearly at a very big advantage.
The 240hz was seen as " first flash then bullet came out"
While the 144hz was " first bullet then flash "
Big advantage imo.
a n i m e
n
i
m
e
Thank you I'm a geometry dash player and I was thinking of going to cpu so this will be helpful
my monitor is 60hz and it has some little scratches, do I need to upgrade it?
I actually used to play better with 60fps at some point, because I was so used to accounting for the small but noticeable frame gap between 60fps and higher.
Ohh that's why I can't AWP well in 60hz ??? The enemies r moving so fast in my screen 🤣
Got a 144hz monitor a few years ago, and the difference was night and day. 60fps instantly became more like 30fps to me.
The best way to describe a 144hz monitor is that it's "liquid". Everything is so extremely smooth, even the desktop - you feel like you're swimming with ease.
trocar o display do monitor de 144hz por um de 60hz funciona?
What about if you don't play games in slow motion? Because I don't usually play games in extreme slowmotion?
240Hz display also allows each frame to be rendered and showed on screen for each 4 milliseconds, while it takes 16.6 milliseconds for each frame if the refresh rate is 60Hz. Generally speaking, the images shown on a 240Hz screen will "stick to" your inputs much closer than what a 60Hz screen can achieve, which eventually means much lower input lag.
16ms of lag is definitely perceivable if your game is intense. I play a game called OSU(check out some videos if you've never heard of it), it's a very intense rhythm game which requires you to move your mouse non-stop and change direction like 5 times per second. We will usually unlock the fps to let it go above 1000fps so that the render time is reduced to less than 1ms. The game is not playable if you lock it to 60fps, because the cursor is not responsive enough after the 16ms lag caused by the limited frame rate.
Am I the only one who can tell the difference between 144hz and 240 just my moving the cursor around?
Do people seriously not see it? The mouse trails being more in between? really?
MoonBlade I immediately saw the difference of a 240Hz monitor and I use 144Hz monitor
If manufacturers would start putting in the research to make 240hz a standard, it is possible.
But instead, they wanted 4k, which is only because it's easy to market.
In a alternate reality where all monitors came standard at 240hz, then one year all of sudden they dropped it to 60 everybody and their dog would notice. I guess 60hz is so associated with that "computery feel" that people are scared to move outside that field of refresh rate.
In this alternate reality, we are still using CRT displays, which have 0ms input lag even on the absolute shittiest ones, beautiful colors, a perfect contrast ratio and theoretically, have a limitless refresh rate provided the way the technology works. Actually if flat screens were never made, 240hz would probably be a refresh rate laughed at by the PC Master Race who would be using 600hz displays at 1024x768.
As humans we have trained our brains what to expect from motion, 60 is pretty sad.
Harry Lin It really depends on the game/engine. Not every games input is frame dependent, a lot feature async keyboard an then your framerate is pretty much irrelevant if its at least your monitor refresh rate.
120hz on my new laptop, what a difference it makes. its like getting glasses for the first time lmao.
so is 60 bad ?
@@joeyhernandez7908 pretty much yeah. I thought 30HZ looked awful when I had a 60hz monitor.
After I got 144hz, 60hz looked awful and 30hz made me want to jump out a 10 story building into magma
I've noticed that my games feel the smoothest on my 144Hz G-Sync monitor when running at 140 FPS (where I've capped the FPS). Everything is still good at 135 FPS, but as soon as it drops to 120 FPS, I immediately sense a difference - the game doesn't feel as smooth and noticeably worse. Has anyone else experienced this "issue," or is it possibly just my sensitivity? For fast-paced games like Warzone, I find 80 FPS almost unplayable. I've swapped out hardware and monitors multiple times, but the problem persists. Am I just too sensitive, or has anyone else had similar experiences?
I have a question, what’s the point of having multiple monitors?
Should have shown 30fps for all the console sheep.
+1
+Goldfinger W, if the game is not exclusive, you will prefer PC port then. Because better picture, better resolution, better FPS. That's the point
Goldfinger W
Tell me what investments youve made then silly
Im not a pc elitist and im not with the original comment calling conole players “sheep.” But its clear to me that these console “sheep” he is referring to are people that refuse to believe the human eye can see above 30 fps. Honestly if you believe that and youre not atleast 40 years old, thats fucking remarkable.
@Goldfinger W *has both console and a PC, also uses cryptocurrency* "Fucking nerds", bahaha, pathetic
There is no need for that. I have a PC, but people like you are what gives the PC community a bad name. Respect other peoples choices, they may not have enough money. Be fucking considerate, no one Is going to like you, and probably dont even now.
“The human eye cannot see more than 30 FPS”
go back to school...
hes joking you moron
U r right dude human eye can't but gamer's eyes can!
You forgot a zero.
馬鹿を見ると話しかけます can i overclock my eyes to get more FPS?
Superb distinction
So higher fps/ response time will stop motion blur?
Sweeeeet!
The difference between 240 and 144 is that 240 puts a whole in your pocket where money used to be
*hole
My first monitor i bought was 74hz but i looked at advanced settings or nvidia control panel and i was 75?
bumping from a 60hz to 240hz tommorrow i know shit is going to be fire
I use a 60hz monitor. I feel like a console peasant again
bruh
Good video. What I learned is that if I playback my games in slow motion, get a 144hz or 240hz monitor.
Question is what hardware we need to have to have 240 fps in games... and what 240Hz monitor gives when you have 60-90 fps?
Moved up from a 27" IPS 1440p144 to a 48" OLED 4k120 and i have to say I don't miss the other monitor.
More fps gives you... More frames per second! Who would've thought. Great experiment.
It's helpful because it shows a comparison. I've only played on a 60hz monitor so I have no idea what the actual difference between different hz monitors is like. But now I can conclude that higher hz is definitely better.
This video makes me want 240hz... I'm currently on 60hz and was planning to upgrade to 144hz.
Can you check diffrence between 144 and 250, when rotating [first person shooter] camera to see the diffrence at what speed 144hz blurs and at what 240hz blurs
Here my like bro..on the point explanation
Cheers, looking at this, 120hz is much better than 60hz, but 240hz doesn't seem like a massive improvement. Yes it is less jerky, but I think if you can get away from 60hz to 100hz+, you are doing well. My 73hz OC is feeling inadequate.
10 years ago, we said the same about 30hz vs 60hz
uhm, TH-cam doesn't allow higher refresh rates than 60, and this video is in fact only in 50fps, this is why he slowed it down so much
240Hz UltraWide 4k with Freesync, Flicker free, minimum or no bleed, 10βιτ and100% sRGB gamut? Ill see you in 10 years!
no point in 4k freesync
Make that AdobeRGB.
fantastic video
But should i get a 144hz g sync monitor if its TN?
60hz and below have teleportation effect
Not on normal speed.
Not on a good TV.
TV has high input lag. There is also high ghosting factor. So if you see continous line instead of mustiple mouse pointers, your display is ghosting a lot. Or you have stroboscopic backlight which is not good for eyes.
Paweł Stankiewicz Idiot
That means 60hz is better cause we are hacking legally
60Hz: internet explorer
So is 120 and 60 hz a very noticeable difference ? And is 144 a lot better than 120?
Question is how will this effect our eyes and brain long term? I assume higher is safer? Its usually newer technology these days are worse for our health than better so i am curious if anyone notice any difference in eye strain, dryness, eye problems or even mental health when using different Hz monitors?
I remember once i've seen my friend's monitor... It was so fking smooth but i dont know how much hertz did it have...
I hope it was 144hz because im buying one .. and
60hz sucks mate
Complot theory: 240hz only good for slo mo
Can I get a little help with Hertz. I'm learning this whole pc master race thing. I have a 120hz monitor. If my game is ultra graphics running at 60fps will my monitor feel like 60hz if my fps is 60?
Yes. To achieve 120Hz your game needs to run at 120 FPS
I'm torn, I'm getting a new pc that can run 4k easily at 60fps on games like BFV (2070 with core I7 8700) and I don't know whether to get a 60hz 4k monitor or a 144hz monitor. Can anyone help?
Better to wait a few years for those (affordable) 4k 144hz monitors huh
4k??? Yeah my pc aint gonna be able to run that
FPS: 60
Monitor refresh rate: 30 hz
*BOTTLENECK*
?
now I see, in 144hz your eyes is more focus because the object is moving smoothly & that makes your eyes reaction much faster, so when you look at 60hz you can see the interval like its pausing
My pc build is ryzen 5 3600 Rx 5700 GPU and 16 GB ram do you think my build can handle 165hz?
Whats the difference of fps and hertz?
What should I get 1440p with 144 hz or 1080p with 240 hz
I'm happy with my 1440p 144hz Gsync IPS panel. A nice compromise right now, especially with a 1080Ti.
i would be too
daaaamn
What is the name of your panel?
yea me too, my lamborghini sits between my 2 bugatti, which is a nice compromise even though there is still one free place for my new BMW between those 2 maserattis under my collection of small penises
I'm happy with my 1440p 165hz Gsync IPS panel. A nice compromise right now, especially with a 1080Ti.
240 Hz looks like true slow motion
xd yes
My TV has "Trumotion 120" is that the same as 120Hz refresh rate?
Yeasss thank you Mann!! 😃😃
who still have 60hz monitor laik mi xd
Those with a 4K monitor and many others at 720p/900p/1080p/1440p. 60 is great and even 48/50 is. 75/100/144/240 are great too. Thomas Edison once said that 46 frames per second was the minimum needed for the eye to perceive motion: "Anything less will strain the eye."
I had that before I feel you now i have aoc g2460f 144hz 1920x1080
I don't. 144hz all the way. I realized the importance of it right away, so I just saved up a little bit longer and used my TV for a monitor until I could pick up something nice. Then I found a 60hz monitor on craigslist for $20. Now I use my TV, 60hz and 144hz off the back of my 1080 Ti and have lots of real estate for various things. If I just want to play a game like The Witcher 3, sometimes I'll just play it over 4K with an HDMI 2.0 cable at 60FPS, but if I'm playing a game that I want to compete in - that's when I'll always use my smaller 1080p 144hz xl2411. Before I knew about HDMI 2.0, I was getting only 30FPS, and it was really making me sick. That's how I found out about HDMI 2.0, because I was like, "Wow. This is crazy. I can't be the only one." did a Google search, and found some MVP that hooked me up with that knowledge. Honestly, I'd love to have a 240hz monitor, but it's hard to justify the price of some of the good ones with how much of diminishing return it is after 144hz.
1280×1024 60 hz
I have 2880x1800 60hz macbook, and I'm getting a 3440x1440 75hz Ultrawide Monitor