OMG, I was 6 years old by the time, and our apartment was right next to Tian An Men Square. It’s nice to see the scenes in the old days, all thanks to this video
秦晖Qin Hui：The closest thing to China's urban-rural dual registered residence system is the former apartheid system of white people against black people in South Africa. The common characteristics behind them are low human rights, lack of property rights, and inequality in public services. The most fundamental reasons behind China's registered residence system are three inequalities: the first is the inequality of human rights, especially the right of residence. The second issue is unequal property rights. Chinese farmers do not have their real property and cannot freely buy and sell their land in the market. The third issue is inequality in public services, where government officials and high-ranking officials enjoy high privileges and benefits, urban residents enjoy low benefits, and rural residents and migrant workers enjoy negative benefits. Today, China's "negative welfare" system has greatly exacerbated the gap between the rich and the poor, leading to the widespread low human rights situation of most people in China. Therefore, China's human rights issue is definitely not as simple as the human rights of Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong, but a comprehensive and overall human rights issue of most people. Especially in the context of China's accession to the WTO and the game rules of economic globalization, the so-called "China model" actually takes advantage of the "negative welfare" and "low human rights" advantages of hundreds of millions of migrant workers in China, coupled with the Chinese government's ability to expropriate land, forcibly demolish buildings, and arbitrarily drive out low-end poor people to engage in "enclosure movements". Only by attracting a large amount of investment through the "China model" and making China a world's factory, can there be red sweatshops that exploit Chinese migrant workers more than capitalist sweatshops. If free and democratic countries around the world cannot unite to exert pressure on the Chinese government to change and improve China's "low human rights" and "negative welfare" situation, then labor in free and democratic countries will be affected and have to lower their human rights and welfare treatment to match that of migrant farmers and workers in China (this can be seen from the documentary "American Factory"). For a government with unlimited power, unlimited accountability can be exercised until it cannot bear it. The way out for China still lies in a gradual and peaceful transformation, with two key points: first, limiting the government's power; Secondly, the common people should vigorously seek welfare from the government. By achieving these two points, the ideal constitutionalism and democracy will also come. I think pressure can be continuously applied in both aspects. Gradually improve one thing at a time. The biggest problem that ultimately leads to the current system is the problem of too much power and too little responsibility, constantly being compressed. When it comes to matching power and responsibility, China's political system changes.
秦晖Qin Hui：The closest thing to China's urban-rural dual registered residence system is the former apartheid system of white people against black people in South Africa. The common characteristics behind them are low human rights, lack of property rights, and inequality in public services. The most fundamental reasons behind China's registered residence system are three inequalities: the first is the inequality of human rights, especially the right of residence. The second issue is unequal property rights. Chinese farmers do not have their real property and cannot freely buy and sell their land in the market. The third issue is inequality in public services, where government officials and high-ranking officials enjoy high privileges and benefits, urban residents enjoy low benefits, and rural residents and migrant workers enjoy negative benefits. Today, China's "negative welfare" system has greatly exacerbated the gap between the rich and the poor, leading to the widespread low human rights situation of most people in China. Therefore, China's human rights issue is definitely not as simple as the human rights of Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong, but a comprehensive and overall human rights issue of most people. Especially in the context of China's accession to the WTO and the game rules of economic globalization, the so-called "China model" actually takes advantage of the "negative welfare" and "low human rights" advantages of hundreds of millions of migrant workers in China, coupled with the Chinese government's ability to expropriate land, forcibly demolish buildings, and arbitrarily drive out low-end poor people to engage in "enclosure movements". Only by attracting a large amount of investment through the "China model" and making China a world's factory, can there be red sweatshops that exploit Chinese migrant workers more than capitalist sweatshops. If free and democratic countries around the world cannot unite to exert pressure on the Chinese government to change and improve China's "low human rights" and "negative welfare" situation, then labor in free and democratic countries will be affected and have to lower their human rights and welfare treatment to match that of migrant farmers and workers in China (this can be seen from the documentary "American Factory"). For a government with unlimited power, unlimited accountability can be exercised until it cannot bear it. The way out for China still lies in a gradual and peaceful transformation, with two key points: first, limiting the government's power; Secondly, the common people should vigorously seek welfare from the government. By achieving these two points, the ideal constitutionalism and democracy will also come. I think pressure can be continuously applied in both aspects. Gradually improve one thing at a time. The biggest problem that ultimately leads to the current system is the problem of too much power and too little responsibility, constantly being compressed. When it comes to matching power and responsibility, China's political system changes.
I love you mother, Uniter of Nation, Protector of the people. So gracious to see father by your side every step of the way. Love y'all, forever and always--Prince Lawson The Duke🇬🇧
Apparently the british didn't cared much about China at the time. The narrator pronounced Chairman Li Xian Nian's name as something like "Li Xianyang", and later called a Chinese Red Flag limo a "Red Star", talking about rigorous jounalism... Wonder how much has changed, perhaps not a lot.
funny how this video showd 3 leaders of china, but none was the president li xiannian. the three leaders are: deng xiaoping, just like what the commentator said, has no tittle at that time, but was the real paramount leader. hu yaobang, at that tims was the party leader. and jiang zeming, at that time was the party secretary of Shanghai city. 5 yrs later, he will becam the paramount leader of china. on the other hand, president li was never had any real power. he was chosen to be president mostly because seniority.
1.歡樂歌 Song of Joy 2.云慶 Celebration in Yunnan 3.四合如意 All is Happening as Desired 4.行街 Walking on the Streets 5.中花六板/薰風曲 Medium Fancy Six Beat 6.三六/梅花三落 Three Six 7.慢六板 Slow Six Beat 8.花三六 Fancy Six Beat
秦晖Qin Hui：The closest thing to China's urban-rural dual registered residence system is the former apartheid system of white people against black people in South Africa. The common characteristics behind them are low human rights, lack of property rights, and inequality in public services. The most fundamental reasons behind China's registered residence system are three inequalities: the first is the inequality of human rights, especially the right of residence. The second issue is unequal property rights. Chinese farmers do not have their real property and cannot freely buy and sell their land in the market. The third issue is inequality in public services, where government officials and high-ranking officials enjoy high privileges and benefits, urban residents enjoy low benefits, and rural residents and migrant workers enjoy negative benefits. Today, China's "negative welfare" system has greatly exacerbated the gap between the rich and the poor, leading to the widespread low human rights situation of most people in China. Therefore, China's human rights issue is definitely not as simple as the human rights of Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong, but a comprehensive and overall human rights issue of most people. Especially in the context of China's accession to the WTO and the game rules of economic globalization, the so-called "China model" actually takes advantage of the "negative welfare" and "low human rights" advantages of hundreds of millions of migrant workers in China, coupled with the Chinese government's ability to expropriate land, forcibly demolish buildings, and arbitrarily drive out low-end poor people to engage in "enclosure movements". Only by attracting a large amount of investment through the "China model" and making China a world's factory, can there be red sweatshops that exploit Chinese migrant workers more than capitalist sweatshops. If free and democratic countries around the world cannot unite to exert pressure on the Chinese government to change and improve China's "low human rights" and "negative welfare" situation, then labor in free and democratic countries will be affected and have to lower their human rights and welfare treatment to match that of migrant farmers and workers in China (this can be seen from the documentary "American Factory"). For a government with unlimited power, unlimited accountability can be exercised until it cannot bear it. The way out for China still lies in a gradual and peaceful transformation, with two key points: first, limiting the government's power; Secondly, the common people should vigorously seek welfare from the government. By achieving these two points, the ideal constitutionalism and democracy will also come. I think pressure can be continuously applied in both aspects. Gradually improve one thing at a time. The biggest problem that ultimately leads to the current system is the problem of too much power and too little responsibility, constantly being compressed. When it comes to matching power and responsibility, China's political system changes.
1985-1986 was Jesuit-Bone alliance. Head of state of Britain Jesuit name Windsor, Queen Elizabeth II met Head of state of China, Bone name Li Xiannian. Both were friendly to each other.
秦晖Qin Hui：The closest thing to China's urban-rural dual registered residence system is the former apartheid system of white people against black people in South Africa. The common characteristics behind them are low human rights, lack of property rights, and inequality in public services. The most fundamental reasons behind China's registered residence system are three inequalities: the first is the inequality of human rights, especially the right of residence. The second issue is unequal property rights. Chinese farmers do not have their real property and cannot freely buy and sell their land in the market. The third issue is inequality in public services, where government officials and high-ranking officials enjoy high privileges and benefits, urban residents enjoy low benefits, and rural residents and migrant workers enjoy negative benefits. Today, China's "negative welfare" system has greatly exacerbated the gap between the rich and the poor, leading to the widespread low human rights situation of most people in China. Therefore, China's human rights issue is definitely not as simple as the human rights of Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong, but a comprehensive and overall human rights issue of most people. Especially in the context of China's accession to the WTO and the game rules of economic globalization, the so-called "China model" actually takes advantage of the "negative welfare" and "low human rights" advantages of hundreds of millions of migrant workers in China, coupled with the Chinese government's ability to expropriate land, forcibly demolish buildings, and arbitrarily drive out low-end poor people to engage in "enclosure movements". Only by attracting a large amount of investment through the "China model" and making China a world's factory, can there be red sweatshops that exploit Chinese migrant workers more than capitalist sweatshops. If free and democratic countries around the world cannot unite to exert pressure on the Chinese government to change and improve China's "low human rights" and "negative welfare" situation, then labor in free and democratic countries will be affected and have to lower their human rights and welfare treatment to match that of migrant farmers and workers in China (this can be seen from the documentary "American Factory"). For a government with unlimited power, unlimited accountability can be exercised until it cannot bear it. The way out for China still lies in a gradual and peaceful transformation, with two key points: first, limiting the government's power; Secondly, the common people should vigorously seek welfare from the government. By achieving these two points, the ideal constitutionalism and democracy will also come. I think pressure can be continuously applied in both aspects. Gradually improve one thing at a time. The biggest problem that ultimately leads to the current system is the problem of too much power and too little responsibility, constantly being compressed. When it comes to matching power and responsibility, China's political system changes.
It doesn’t matter,coz UK is now a basketcase with homeless all over the London streets with decaying tube stations which is no comparison to the trains ,not even mentioning the bullet trains in China.
I cannot help wondering whether the Queen cringed inside when watching the children dancing like trained robots, one even danced with a plastic garbage bin at her back, though it doesn’t show on her face at all. The translator dressed perfectly for that time. - as a Chinese person grew up during that time and now a citizen of the commonwealth , it now feels so exotic yet familiar at the same time to watch these footage.
@@子小禾 Yes, the camera captured that vitality and the strong feeling of hope, present at that time. We can now blame the sinister designs of the US and the collective West and how things are turning out today:- an observer from NZ.
In Chinese, queen could also be translated to "王后/皇后“ ”refers to the emperor's/king's wife. In China and Japan, a ruler of the nation is considered an "emperor/empress".
@@joei8236 Nope. The video translated the Queen into "Empress" is because the Brits demanded the Chinese in HongKong to call their own monarch in the same way the Chinese would call the Chinese Emperor. They probably hired their translator from HongKong who was used to call her this way.
❤❤❤ Jai Hind sir ji please 🥺🥺❤️ happiness and take care ❤️😘😘😙 namaste sirji 🙏 Jai Hind sir ji 🙏♥️ Pranam aapko 🙏 good morning ji aapko ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘
Has anyone else noticed the disrespectful and condescending language of the narrator? No wonder they lost the "Empire" and now enjoy an ever-residing backseat to the Americans and the rest of Europe.
OMG, I was 6 years old by the time, and our apartment was right next to Tian An Men Square. It’s nice to see the scenes in the old days, all thanks to this video
Can you tell me the name of the Chinese song at the starting of the video
I was just 1 year old and 3km away
Haha, I was also born in 1980 in Jiangsu.
Now I'm in the 40s. Time's really flying.
i love you❤
The apartment would easily be worth over $100m today
This is the type of video I love (QE2 overseas visits)👍🏻❤️, thank you! I do hope there’s more like this to come!
A historical event in the life of one of the greatest women in history!
what has she done to the history, let me think....nothing....
秦晖Qin Hui：The closest thing to China's urban-rural dual registered residence system is the former apartheid system of white people against black people in South Africa. The common characteristics behind them are low human rights, lack of property rights, and inequality in public services.
The most fundamental reasons behind China's registered residence system are three inequalities: the first is the inequality of human rights, especially the right of residence. The second issue is unequal property rights. Chinese farmers do not have their real property and cannot freely buy and sell their land in the market. The third issue is inequality in public services, where government officials and high-ranking officials enjoy high privileges and benefits, urban residents enjoy low benefits, and rural residents and migrant workers enjoy negative benefits.
Today, China's "negative welfare" system has greatly exacerbated the gap between the rich and the poor, leading to the widespread low human rights situation of most people in China. Therefore, China's human rights issue is definitely not as simple as the human rights of Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong, but a comprehensive and overall human rights issue of most people.
Especially in the context of China's accession to the WTO and the game rules of economic globalization, the so-called "China model" actually takes advantage of the "negative welfare" and "low human rights" advantages of hundreds of millions of migrant workers in China, coupled with the Chinese government's ability to expropriate land, forcibly demolish buildings, and arbitrarily drive out low-end poor people to engage in "enclosure movements". Only by attracting a large amount of investment through the "China model" and making China a world's factory, can there be red sweatshops that exploit Chinese migrant workers more than capitalist sweatshops. If free and democratic countries around the world cannot unite to exert pressure on the Chinese government to change and improve China's "low human rights" and "negative welfare" situation, then labor in free and democratic countries will be affected and have to lower their human rights and welfare treatment to match that of migrant farmers and workers in China (this can be seen from the documentary "American Factory").
For a government with unlimited power, unlimited accountability can be exercised until it cannot bear it. The way out for China still lies in a gradual and peaceful transformation, with two key points: first, limiting the government's power; Secondly, the common people should vigorously seek welfare from the government. By achieving these two points, the ideal constitutionalism and democracy will also come. I think pressure can be continuously applied in both aspects. Gradually improve one thing at a time. The biggest problem that ultimately leads to the current system is the problem of too much power and too little responsibility, constantly being compressed. When it comes to matching power and responsibility, China's political system changes.
Queen Elizabeth looks gorgeous!
Yes Queen Elizabeth looked gorgeous when she was younger back she was alive.
Just think this time last year was the last whole month with Queen Elizabeth 2 in England.
秦晖Qin Hui：The closest thing to China's urban-rural dual registered residence system is the former apartheid system of white people against black people in South Africa. The common characteristics behind them are low human rights, lack of property rights, and inequality in public services.
The most fundamental reasons behind China's registered residence system are three inequalities: the first is the inequality of human rights, especially the right of residence. The second issue is unequal property rights. Chinese farmers do not have their real property and cannot freely buy and sell their land in the market. The third issue is inequality in public services, where government officials and high-ranking officials enjoy high privileges and benefits, urban residents enjoy low benefits, and rural residents and migrant workers enjoy negative benefits.
Today, China's "negative welfare" system has greatly exacerbated the gap between the rich and the poor, leading to the widespread low human rights situation of most people in China. Therefore, China's human rights issue is definitely not as simple as the human rights of Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong, but a comprehensive and overall human rights issue of most people.
Especially in the context of China's accession to the WTO and the game rules of economic globalization, the so-called "China model" actually takes advantage of the "negative welfare" and "low human rights" advantages of hundreds of millions of migrant workers in China, coupled with the Chinese government's ability to expropriate land, forcibly demolish buildings, and arbitrarily drive out low-end poor people to engage in "enclosure movements". Only by attracting a large amount of investment through the "China model" and making China a world's factory, can there be red sweatshops that exploit Chinese migrant workers more than capitalist sweatshops. If free and democratic countries around the world cannot unite to exert pressure on the Chinese government to change and improve China's "low human rights" and "negative welfare" situation, then labor in free and democratic countries will be affected and have to lower their human rights and welfare treatment to match that of migrant farmers and workers in China (this can be seen from the documentary "American Factory").
For a government with unlimited power, unlimited accountability can be exercised until it cannot bear it. The way out for China still lies in a gradual and peaceful transformation, with two key points: first, limiting the government's power; Secondly, the common people should vigorously seek welfare from the government. By achieving these two points, the ideal constitutionalism and democracy will also come. I think pressure can be continuously applied in both aspects. Gradually improve one thing at a time. The biggest problem that ultimately leads to the current system is the problem of too much power and too little responsibility, constantly being compressed. When it comes to matching power and responsibility, China's political system changes.
@@envisionwewew2270she was over 60 😅😅😅
Her Majesty in her hey-days.
Thank you! ✨ ❤
Amazing visit HM Queen Elizabeth is one of the greatst humanitarian in history.
She was wearing red ❤in her China tour🥹 I miss you your majesty 😢
All those memories🎉🎉🎉🎉
The commentator is awful. All that colonial snobbery and British superiority
I love you mother, Uniter of Nation, Protector of the people. So gracious to see father by your side every step of the way. Love y'all, forever and always--Prince Lawson The Duke🇬🇧
I don't know what to make of the Monty Python commentary
Королеве очень тёмные волосы идут❤Какая же была красива в молодости! И муж тоже красивым был. Красивая пара❤
Apparently the british didn't cared much about China at the time. The narrator pronounced Chairman Li Xian Nian's name as something like "Li Xianyang", and later called a Chinese Red Flag limo a "Red Star", talking about rigorous jounalism... Wonder how much has changed, perhaps not a lot.
There are man-made things visible from "space" but the Great Wall isn't one of them...at least not without special equipment.
Many peoples didn't know this video is exist.
❤
funny how this video showd 3 leaders of china, but none was the president li xiannian.
the three leaders are: deng xiaoping, just like what the commentator said, has no tittle at that time, but was the real paramount leader.
hu yaobang, at that tims was the party leader.
and jiang zeming, at that time was the party secretary of Shanghai city. 5 yrs later, he will becam the paramount leader of china.
on the other hand, president li was never had any real power. he was chosen to be president mostly because seniority.
Brilliance is like money it comes and goes often❤❤🎉🎉
politically, 1986 was the best time of China, till the democratic movement in December. One had the feeling, the democracy would come soon
Naima dris nsalak nafitha
This was before Chancellor Deng Xiaoping purged liberals from the Communist Party and declared himself Emperor of the Galaxy.
Can anybody tell which Chinese song is this in beginning of the video.
its called phak yur mamz
江南絲竹八大名曲 又名: Eight Masterpieces of Kong-Nam Folk Music
1.歡樂歌 Song of Joy
2.云慶 Celebration in Yunnan
3.四合如意 All is Happening as Desired
4.行街 Walking on the Streets
5.中花六板/薰風曲 Medium Fancy Six Beat
6.三六/梅花三落 Three Six
7.慢六板 Slow Six Beat
8.花三六 Fancy Six Beat
Thannk you @@董東方
秦晖Qin Hui：The closest thing to China's urban-rural dual registered residence system is the former apartheid system of white people against black people in South Africa. The common characteristics behind them are low human rights, lack of property rights, and inequality in public services.
The most fundamental reasons behind China's registered residence system are three inequalities: the first is the inequality of human rights, especially the right of residence. The second issue is unequal property rights. Chinese farmers do not have their real property and cannot freely buy and sell their land in the market. The third issue is inequality in public services, where government officials and high-ranking officials enjoy high privileges and benefits, urban residents enjoy low benefits, and rural residents and migrant workers enjoy negative benefits.
Today, China's "negative welfare" system has greatly exacerbated the gap between the rich and the poor, leading to the widespread low human rights situation of most people in China. Therefore, China's human rights issue is definitely not as simple as the human rights of Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong, but a comprehensive and overall human rights issue of most people.
Especially in the context of China's accession to the WTO and the game rules of economic globalization, the so-called "China model" actually takes advantage of the "negative welfare" and "low human rights" advantages of hundreds of millions of migrant workers in China, coupled with the Chinese government's ability to expropriate land, forcibly demolish buildings, and arbitrarily drive out low-end poor people to engage in "enclosure movements". Only by attracting a large amount of investment through the "China model" and making China a world's factory, can there be red sweatshops that exploit Chinese migrant workers more than capitalist sweatshops. If free and democratic countries around the world cannot unite to exert pressure on the Chinese government to change and improve China's "low human rights" and "negative welfare" situation, then labor in free and democratic countries will be affected and have to lower their human rights and welfare treatment to match that of migrant farmers and workers in China (this can be seen from the documentary "American Factory").
For a government with unlimited power, unlimited accountability can be exercised until it cannot bear it. The way out for China still lies in a gradual and peaceful transformation, with two key points: first, limiting the government's power; Secondly, the common people should vigorously seek welfare from the government. By achieving these two points, the ideal constitutionalism and democracy will also come. I think pressure can be continuously applied in both aspects. Gradually improve one thing at a time. The biggest problem that ultimately leads to the current system is the problem of too much power and too little responsibility, constantly being compressed. When it comes to matching power and responsibility, China's political system changes.
1985-1986 was Jesuit-Bone alliance. Head of state of Britain Jesuit name Windsor, Queen Elizabeth II met Head of state of China, Bone name Li Xiannian. Both were friendly to each other.
❤😊
❤❤
God save the late queen
Prefer QE2's 1975 visit to HK. CCP is no good.
Masya Allah la quwwata Illa Billah.
I was 10 days old.
her majesty visited our hometown during this trip😂
Kunming. My hometown😢
1986 was wen I was born
當時有咁鮮艷的七彩顏色嗎。
I was 2 years old.
No creo que la reina se haya sentido muy cómoda en esa vista
😢 ni como preguntarle
秦晖Qin Hui：The closest thing to China's urban-rural dual registered residence system is the former apartheid system of white people against black people in South Africa. The common characteristics behind them are low human rights, lack of property rights, and inequality in public services.
The most fundamental reasons behind China's registered residence system are three inequalities: the first is the inequality of human rights, especially the right of residence. The second issue is unequal property rights. Chinese farmers do not have their real property and cannot freely buy and sell their land in the market. The third issue is inequality in public services, where government officials and high-ranking officials enjoy high privileges and benefits, urban residents enjoy low benefits, and rural residents and migrant workers enjoy negative benefits.
Today, China's "negative welfare" system has greatly exacerbated the gap between the rich and the poor, leading to the widespread low human rights situation of most people in China. Therefore, China's human rights issue is definitely not as simple as the human rights of Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong, but a comprehensive and overall human rights issue of most people.
Especially in the context of China's accession to the WTO and the game rules of economic globalization, the so-called "China model" actually takes advantage of the "negative welfare" and "low human rights" advantages of hundreds of millions of migrant workers in China, coupled with the Chinese government's ability to expropriate land, forcibly demolish buildings, and arbitrarily drive out low-end poor people to engage in "enclosure movements". Only by attracting a large amount of investment through the "China model" and making China a world's factory, can there be red sweatshops that exploit Chinese migrant workers more than capitalist sweatshops. If free and democratic countries around the world cannot unite to exert pressure on the Chinese government to change and improve China's "low human rights" and "negative welfare" situation, then labor in free and democratic countries will be affected and have to lower their human rights and welfare treatment to match that of migrant farmers and workers in China (this can be seen from the documentary "American Factory").
For a government with unlimited power, unlimited accountability can be exercised until it cannot bear it. The way out for China still lies in a gradual and peaceful transformation, with two key points: first, limiting the government's power; Secondly, the common people should vigorously seek welfare from the government. By achieving these two points, the ideal constitutionalism and democracy will also come. I think pressure can be continuously applied in both aspects. Gradually improve one thing at a time. The biggest problem that ultimately leads to the current system is the problem of too much power and too little responsibility, constantly being compressed. When it comes to matching power and responsibility, China's political system changes.
Yo digo exactamente lo mismo. SE la ve muy incomoda.
当穿着中山装的官员登上女王的游艇的时候，两国当时的发展差距令人唏嘘，大英帝国遥遥领先，短短三十几年，已经追平并领先了英国。
The commentary is dripping in condescension.
The commentator is funny.
9:28 The commentator doesn't think much of the royal dragon throne.🤣
9:40 The interpreter with the limitless words.🤣
Can you tell me the name of the Chinese song of the beginning of the videos
@@minnielee3399can you tell me the name of the Chinese song at the beginning of the video
@@seemasonigra829 Sorry I don't know it.
It doesn’t matter,coz UK is now a basketcase with homeless all over the London streets with decaying tube stations which is no comparison to the trains ,not even mentioning the bullet trains in China.
💯 priceless. REST IN PARADISE THE QUEEN ELIZABETH. RIP PRINCE PHILIPPE 😇😇🙌👏🙌👏💕💞🎍💜🤍🎍✨️✨️✨️✨️✨️
Tonghua Restaurant 🇹🇴. Chief of 'Eua . Taione
I cannot help wondering whether the Queen cringed inside when watching the children dancing like trained robots, one even danced with a plastic garbage bin at her back, though it doesn’t show on her face at all. The translator dressed perfectly for that time. - as a Chinese person grew up during that time and now a citizen of the commonwealth , it now feels so exotic yet familiar at the same time to watch these footage.
What is the name of the Chinese song at the starting of the video
Why should she cringe? Children dancing like robots were done all over the world 😂😂😂😂😂
How about the moon in the Commonwealth, is it rounder than in China?
I found the children's performance rather charming. That is what you do when you honour somebody who is held in high regard. You make too much of it.
I wonder if the Chinese people remember the Jewish Sassoon family and their importation of opium into China?
居然能在那里看
😂I was born 7 years later. Lovely Queen. Thanks for sharing！
真的不一样了，以前看着像朝鲜一样。希望她能看到今天的中国。
以前是看着像…现在嘛…自己体会
当时一点也不像，整个社会朝气蓬勃，人民生活有目标，而且一天比一天好。
@@子小禾 Yes, the camera captured that vitality and the strong feeling of hope, present at that time. We can now blame the sinister designs of the US and the collective West and how things are turning out today:- an observer from NZ.
@@子小禾 你现在感觉不朝气蓬勃生活没目标只能说明你自己这些年太失败，中国现在不缺朝气蓬勃生活有目标的人
以前的中国真是贫穷啊，自从宋朝之后生活水平都没怎么提高，还好近20年翻天覆地地发展了
Kissenger support China.
Poor but dignified.
@@francisheperi4180 By flattering Brits?
Mr. Jiang 27:47 LOL
49:30
Did she visit former Emperor PuYi?
Puyi died in 1969
有可能😂
It is a good time for King 🤴 Charles to visit China 🇨🇳.
We need to get rid of all these silly uncomfortable shoes for women's feet. #Puma #Llbean #Hushpuppies #Rf 🙏 our safe steps.
She is quoted as saying that she liked ''sensible shoes''. 😊
1:43 Chinese Anthem
La reina ama a mao.
Greedy Queen Elizabeth and SandyLgallagher Cia
Disgusting !
BOSS WOMAN/////
Nah dicontohkan Elisabeth nah Cino 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
Xi jing pin.. It should be Queen elizabeth
tiongkok
🎬♟️
🕊🇺🇲💕
"How condescending is British?"
Watch this video
Elizabeth is a 女王 “queen” not a 女皇 “empress”
In Chinese, queen could also be translated to "王后/皇后“ ”refers to the emperor's/king's wife. In China and Japan, a ruler of the nation is considered an "emperor/empress".
@@joei8236 Nope. The video translated the Queen into "Empress" is because the Brits demanded the Chinese in HongKong to call their own monarch in the same way the Chinese would call the Chinese Emperor. They probably hired their translator from HongKong who was used to call her this way.
Banality of the “elite”.
❤❤❤ Jai Hind sir ji please 🥺🥺❤️ happiness and take care ❤️😘😘😙 namaste sirji 🙏 Jai Hind sir ji 🙏♥️
Pranam aapko 🙏 good morning ji aapko
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘
1986年的中國還很貧窮
Has anyone else noticed the disrespectful and condescending language of the narrator? No wonder they lost the "Empire" and now enjoy an ever-residing backseat to the Americans and the rest of Europe.
Indeed.
There is no translation provided by yutube, so I can't understand it and I won't be emotional. I like the history of China, rich or poor.
Large portions of snobbery and humour... British toffee-nosed humour, in equal measure. 😬
那一年邓小平 82 女皇 60
They are all inda same bed.
芳姨
我认为这个视频的解说充满了一直以来对中国的偏见。I think the commentary in this video is full of long-standing prejudices against China.
There were inappropriate snide remarks.
There is definitely some of that in the video, but there is a lot of british humor in it, too.
A little bit of both: snobbery and humour, British humour. 😬
Nobody cares about the queen
I admire about the queen. I strongly believe there are many people who believe like me
Uffffff
Maybe you ,don't care but many people do ! Who are you to speak for people ?
The Queen je dead but I still admire and love her ! I am French...
女王是善良的、宽容的、乐观的、坚强的人。当年的欢迎活动虽然是中国政府组织的，但是人们从内心尊重这位女性。今天，大多数中国人依然对女王充满敬意❤🙏
nobody cares about you😂
收藏😂太好玩了
❤
❤
❤
❤
❤
❤