2009 Audi A4 Avant 2.0 TDI (143 PS) TEST DRIVE

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2024
  • Amazon (DE)
    GoPro: amzn.to/3eL7AdF
    Camcorder: amzn.to/3cCB37o
    Amazon (US)
    GoPro: amzn.to/2SuPfb3
    Camcorder: amzn.to/2VYLPzD
    2009 Audi A4 Avant 2.0 TDI
    105 kW / 141 HP / 143 PS
    2.0L Turbo Diesel Engine
    1968 cm3 / 120.1 CUI
    4-Cylinder
    320 Nm / 236 ft-lb
    6-Speed Manual
    TEST DRIVE by Michi
    Interior & Cockpit Design
    Exterior Design
    Driving & Sound / POV
    Computer & Entertaiment on Board
    Light Night Design
    Fuel Consumption from 80 to 200 kmh (50 to 124 mph)
    Acceleration 0-210 kmh
    Top Speed German Autobahn

ความคิดเห็น • 43

  • @user-ix7eh7oi6o
    @user-ix7eh7oi6o 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Amazing low revs very efficient

  • @ЛукаМијушковић
    @ЛукаМијушковић 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I love always being the first one to watch your videos! :)

  • @rot2945
    @rot2945 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Very very nice Video , i like it ❤️😍

  • @lukes-uf4bc
    @lukes-uf4bc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Shift up to 4000 rpm in 2d and 3rd and it do 10sec

    • @winter5991
      @winter5991 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Prob even faster ass shifts

  • @marvinatl8528
    @marvinatl8528 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Ich hab genau den selben, nur in sauber 😅

  • @dalitsomzyece5627
    @dalitsomzyece5627 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Would you recommend it to be first car material?

    • @apex3369
      @apex3369 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I would

  • @andreahila1979
    @andreahila1979 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Test drive audi A4 2009 170 cv berlina pls

  • @Mr11ESSE111
    @Mr11ESSE111 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    audi have this model from 2008 up to 2015/16 with this oldie interior and oldie technic without automatic brakes or line detect

    • @CheesemanGT
      @CheesemanGT 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Look who is back. When he doesn't find the fuel consumption bad enough to complain about, he says the interior of a car in 2009 looks dated. No shit Sherlock!

    • @Mr11ESSE111
      @Mr11ESSE111 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CheesemanGT of course it is outdsted even bmw was not nothing better too or even worse with that red colour of board computer

    • @IronWarrior95
      @IronWarrior95 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You have over 1000 comments on TH-cam and in every one of them you are complaining about every shit that has to do with a car. What a moron! I guess your car has an interior from 2050 and it can fly backwards and the fuel consumption is 3.5 litres of soy milk / 1.000km!

  • @skzstyle
    @skzstyle 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Are you sure about that range? How big is it the tank?

    • @TESTDRIVEFREAK
      @TESTDRIVEFREAK  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      63 liter but some says 65 liter some website says 63 liter, but i put 63 liter on range

  • @alexx8186
    @alexx8186 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Je nach Kraftstoffverbrauch ist dieses Auto besser als neu

  • @Roonuss
    @Roonuss 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @TEST DRIVE FREAK
    Is there big diffrence comparing with golf VII in terms of road nosie, comfort and interior quality?

    • @bmwforlife1051
      @bmwforlife1051 ปีที่แล้ว

      Probaby, but not much if there is...
      There is couse its top class from vw in general, this is comparable i mean on same league meto to be as bmw and literaly quality king mercedes, so thers like opel ford mazda peugeot etc great cars but mercedes bmw audi litteraly when they made cars they dont care about them 😅, they competeng to germans them self to say mostly of the time, if u compare vw to some manufactures as mentioned than vw is great, its good but materials sound etc ride quality is better in those three muscetars" 🤣 probably not huge much but a bit better for sure, I had golf 5 and compared what I had before megane and peugeot, they are comfort Kings for traveling but sound inside and overal ride was better in vw so there is, from golf 5 to sit jn thise from my friend a4 but sedam 2008 b8 wich is this, its different longer car feels havier for sure, door closing like tank silent and heavy sound so is better but not buy large difference to say, enjoy ur golf and not wory or get a3 wich is better and closer to compare to a4 in terms of everything

    • @Roonuss
      @Roonuss ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bmwforlife1051 I have atm a3 2008 and thinking of new car between a4 and golf 7 variant ;)

    • @RallyVozac
      @RallyVozac ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@bmwforlife1051 Does this A4 handle better than Golf 5? Talking about more grip in corners?

  • @andreahila1979
    @andreahila1979 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Test drive audi A4 berlina 2009 170 cv

  • @andreahila1979
    @andreahila1979 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Test drive audi A4 berlina 170 cv pls 2009

    • @TESTDRIVEFREAK
      @TESTDRIVEFREAK  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      we dont say berlina, we says sedan/limousine, maybe in future

    • @andreahila1979
      @andreahila1979 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TESTDRIVEFREAK ok test drive audi A4 station wagon 170 cv 2009

  • @V3rt3idiger
    @V3rt3idiger 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wurde der Audi vorher warm gefahren?
    Laut Kühlmitteltemperaturanzeige ist dieser nicht warm gewesen 😅

    • @TESTDRIVEFREAK
      @TESTDRIVEFREAK  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      wo in welche stelle? bei verbrauch, beschleunigung und so ist er normal gewesen, vielleicht nur ca 5 grad unterschied, bei normal fahrt 85 grad und bei voll last 90 grad, manche auto ist auch nicht immer genau 90 grad. Laut forum manche sagen das es Thermostat nicht richtig funktioniert, musst ausgewechselt, manche meinen das es normal mit TDI (dieselmotoren) länger oder fast nie 90Grad erreichen bei einige TDI motoren

    • @bennethille8891
      @bennethille8891 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TESTDRIVEFREAK Habe das gleiche Auto, auch mit gleichem Motor. Bei mir war es das selbe Problem, dass er immer kurz unter 90°C hing oder davon sehr schnell wieder runter kam. Es war tatsächlich das Thermostat kaputt. Nach Wechsel war wieder alles in Ordnung.

  • @tvrtkocro28
    @tvrtkocro28 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why did u short shift in acceleration run?

    • @Mr330d
      @Mr330d 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because it falls back into the torque band quicker over revving these engines are useless my Leon 1.6 tdi 105 was the same quicker to shift at 3,500rpm before chip tuning afterwards it would take 5000rpm happily without dying off

    • @nightpovcars7021
      @nightpovcars7021 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Mr330d aggre!

    • @GDZLLR
      @GDZLLR 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Mr330d the shifts were too short though.. for maximum power output the engine should have been kept between 3000 and 4000 +- 100 rpm

    • @marvinatl8528
      @marvinatl8528 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have the same car + engine, and over ~3.800 rpm nothing really happens anymore 😂

    • @Mr330d
      @Mr330d 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@marvinatl8528 I tried to tell him but he wouldn’t listen he knows best 😂

  • @williamG1127
    @williamG1127 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I think u shift too early man.

    • @TESTDRIVEFREAK
      @TESTDRIVEFREAK  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      one of my friend filmed this car, he drove mostly automatic car, rare with manual and diesel, last time he shift to late like around at 5.000 rpm, i told him shift early next time, but he did shift too much early, now next time he will shift around 1. & 2. gear around at 4.5k rpm then 4k rpm

  • @Mr11ESSE111
    @Mr11ESSE111 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    it have 1 second worse time then those Toyota avensis with 112hp diesel!? pretty lazy engine is this and i drove it and need remap or racechip for better felling

  • @jan_tauer
    @jan_tauer ปีที่แล้ว

    Der Verbrauch ist mit über 7l angegeben, die Reichweite schaffst du niemals.

  • @mr.irisec8661
    @mr.irisec8661 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cam jegoasa masina

  • @dalitsomzyece5627
    @dalitsomzyece5627 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would you recommend it to be first car material?

    • @assttocorsa4519
      @assttocorsa4519 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      When you have The Money its a good car