Thanx this was very helpful I have a exam tomorrow midterm and was unable to understand this topic your video explained it wonderfuly si thanx and don't bother about language
wht isthe difference between static eqbm and dynamic eqbm , in many books it tells dealemberts principle used to convert dynamic problem into static problem also dynamic eqbm is in which net force is zero but the body is moving. can anybody eplain the de aleberts in this point of view
Its origin start from langragian mechenics using *virtual work* or we can day (f-ma)d=0 then d is virtual displacement we got that theorem by asuming that d is not zero then f-ma should be zero.*According to Y.C.Battacharya* oxford publication.Can u tell me like that manner bcoz i cant understand it.as i say.Please thanks for the video👍
2:44 ...Wrong definition of dynamic equilibrium............What's the difference between f=ma (mathematical form of Newton's second law) and d 'alemberts principle ...They are essentially same ....
Psin45 and Pcos45 are components of P force ... Resolution of P force in verti. And hori..(Sin is vertical component in this case).. Mass *acceleration=mg (vertical movement of block due to gravitation).. And R is Resultant.. Simple...
It was all going in the expected way until all of a sudden when hindi came... Please use English so all can understand
plus one on that
Good problem. Good example. Well suited to those in India who can be at home with Hindi.
Thanx this was very helpful I have a exam tomorrow midterm and was unable to understand this topic your video explained it wonderfuly si thanx and don't bother about language
though u switched from english to hindi.... but explained it very well.. i got the concept.. thank u.
Even tho i could not understand what u were saying, u explained it and i understood it. Thank you!
thanks for good conceptual explanation in HINDI!!
Is this guy speaking english alone, or is he mixing in some other language?
+km4hr He also explains the same thing what he told in English, in Hindi as well. He doesn't speak anything different in Hindi.
Sir ji ekdum mast samjhaaya hai aapne. Aur, kuchh chhote chhote bachcho ki bhi aavaaz aa rahi thi peechhe se... gaur kiya maine...
wht isthe difference between static eqbm and dynamic eqbm , in many books it tells dealemberts principle used to convert dynamic problem into static problem
also dynamic eqbm is in which net force is zero but the body is moving. can anybody eplain the de aleberts in this point of view
please explain in english, so that most of the people can understand
Its origin start from langragian mechenics using *virtual work* or we can day (f-ma)d=0 then d is virtual displacement we got that theorem by asuming that d is not zero then f-ma should be zero.*According to Y.C.Battacharya* oxford publication.Can u tell me like that manner bcoz i cant understand it.as i say.Please thanks for the video👍
Thank you sir,very helpful indeed!
Thank you sir... Nice explanation...
Even though it was in Hindi it was still helpfull, thanks
Very well explained
your video are very understoodable please make bsc part 1 physics lectures topic wise
thank u so much sir... now I got it
in which language it was?
thanks u so much sir
ese notes ki trh bhi bta dijiea so that we can received full marks in exam
plz give answer
yes or not
plz
thnkuuu sir.....
Please teach in English....
2:44 ...Wrong definition of dynamic equilibrium............What's the difference between f=ma (mathematical form of Newton's second law) and d 'alemberts principle ...They are essentially same ....
Thank you sir
Thanks I was in last moment of exam and saw this....
Understood to good extent
Don't bother about the language
Thank you so much sir....
Thanks for the explanation in hindi!!
Why didnt you simply solve the force equations?
dhanywad guruji
Psin45 - mg + R=0 ....I can't understand how it comes
Psin45 and Pcos45 are components of P force ... Resolution of P force in verti. And hori..(Sin is vertical component in this case).. Mass *acceleration=mg (vertical movement of block due to gravitation).. And R is Resultant.. Simple...
u started with english and landed into a diff language all together,this is bad
where's the normal force?
concept clear
Sasa since kila mtu anaongea lugha yake I think I should also do the same
Thanks ......
thank u sir..
Thank you so much sir..............:)
thank u sir
Hindi bhasa hi bol lete starting se..
Thanku sir
Nice
nice lecture!!!!!!!!!!!!! :)
Why start in English and continue in Hindi? It was going well at that point but...
thnx
its hindi (indian language).
plz try to talk in english or in malayalam
BEST EXPLANATION.
THOSE WHO WANTS IT IN ENGLISH GO AND TAKE AN ADMISSION IN OXFORD UNIVERSITY......
If you want in Hindi means, why u use English words use Hindi words and make concept on your own , don't copy from foreigners .
why Hindi unnecessary??
I think you have pronunciation problem in English
Please. English.
wtf is that language ? lol. thanks for upload
+aysat That's Hindi. Guess he is doing it for the benefit of both language speakers.
Why this trivial subject a part of my mathematics degree? It's like I'm studying stupid engineering. Ughh
Very poor explanation.
Thanks ...