ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2012
- The Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause is one of the iconic clauses of the Constitution. It has been the centerpiece of Supreme Court jurisprudence in desegregation, affirmative action, and voting rights. In this lecture, Dr. Lindsay Robertson outlines the levels of scrutiny used by the Supreme Court in evaluating Equal Protection cases.
Excellent discussion of our constitutional rights💯
Thanks a lot for this content.
Great Content.
IT IS TO BE INTERPITED IN THE WAY IT WAS WRITTEN
The problem is that it does not work. The reason is that the Supreme Court states that only when the States lack of actions are racially motivated are they unconstitutional.
I sent my child to a school outside the district. I am now a convicted felon.
It Meant What It Said.
I'm not going to agree with internment. And I won't say that appearance and ethnic and cultural differences (European v. Asian) didn't have anything to do with it. However, Japan was also the only country that attacked the United States in both its territories and the states. And, correct me if I'm wrong, the United States never faced an invasion threat from Germany or Italy--only from Japan. On the other hand, my father of German descent served in Navy. My Italian immigrant grandfather worked building LSD's (landing ship docks). His two sons served in the Army. And my mother worked where they built the bubbles for B-17 gunners. Really different treatment.
No More War
How do we abolish unequal protection of our own at-will employment laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States? We should have no homeless problems in our at-will employment States with equal protection of our own laws. All laws of a general nature should have uniform operation. Merely requiring Cause for unemployment compensation in our At-Will employment State should be extra-Constitutional.
Equal is equal, you shouldn't need all these discriminatory terms to make a equal protection clause vaild. How idiotic can these people be. Why should any of these terms have to come into play or even be mentioned. That just shows that government is continually discriminating.
"Equal protection Clause: Section 1of 14th amendment states no state shall deny any person with in it's jurisdiction, equal protection of the law". Copy paste this.
The court has to stop these theories and just apply the law how it is written.
This dude can cure insomnia.
If we the people are governed by our consent, how do we revoke that consent due to the "government" being more harmful, than beneficial to anybody, and everybody, other than itself.
We dont have equal protection. We are prohibited from doing many things our parents, grandparents and other ancestors had the right to do.
Pleed the fifth
I almost fell asleep listening to this guy, even though the material is good.
Antislavery act 14th amendment blackman being called a freeman
How odd. Driving is not a right. And there is a duty of care for people issued licenses to perform thus