I live in an area where ATVs are used on farms and ranches all the time. Generally when you load an ATV onto a truck, you use ramps or a board to get it on the bed, you don't lift it on. She's also changed the story from the seller holding a gun on them so they left and were scared to he followed them and pulled a gun on them. Lots of holes here.
@@CanadaMattGood thing you're not a judge. Our judicial system is so woefully inadequate and clogged as it is, that your idiotic solution would do nothing aside from assuaging your own ego.
@@mellvee There are strict rules in court. I guess you think its ok to show up wearing a bikini too, seeing as though you know so much about the inadequisies of the legal system.
Judge should hold that smart ass attorney in contempt…..I don’t think he handled it well. Stop letting these attorneys get by with stuff. Keep your butt out of it if not your case. He is in contempt.
For what calling out the state, there holding 2 kids in jail over a person who's filed multiple false reports, maybe look into the case before you open your mouth
You people are so weird... you have such a hard on for seeing people punished, sanctioned or admonished without knowing if they deserve it or not. It's like some sort of groupthink sociopathy or something.
@@MollyZelko2.0 he didn't disrespect anyone, it's called fighting for 2 possibly innocent kid's, that the cop never had evidence that has a gun in the first place.
This is fantastic, we actually have a case where one of the participants is Mr Boddy. If we had Col Mustard and Ms Scarlett in the parking lot with the ATV, it would be a TRIPLE Rainbow
Defense attorney Jerome attempted to put inaccuracies on the record. He slid into the hearing and the denied being a part of the previous hearing, so that the record would reflect that whatever was done, was done without him. He didn't know the judge would recite the actual events onto the record in response. He's not only contemptuous, he's also dishonest and totally devoid of integrity.
I absolutely hate it when I go to buy something from someone and they pull a gun on me and force me, at gunpoint, to take recreational vehicles without paying for them.
it does sound like this young man has a father who cares that he does the right thing. it is good to hear, and so refreshing to hear about a good father for a change instead of a father with a negative reaction to his child's life. more of these good men should be talked about instead of the focus that is appointed to the bad, neglectful fathers...
Attorney Porter’s final argument is ridiculous. Two stories against one? That’s a legal argument? And why is she in what looks like a moving vehicle? Did I miss something?
When your client is guilty as charged you learn to come up with crap like that. Good work on her part honestly. What you don't want is a defense attorney that just admits they did it and doesn't try to come up with some BS. It's the way the game is played. Only time you do admit it is when they have you red handed like there's a video of the robbery happening but since no camera caught it and they didn't find the gun then it's one persons word against another. Of course the facts only add up one way but like they said if you can't pound the facts then pound the table. You just have to try to get an inch of reasonable doubt in there and then that means you can get better deals for your client even if they are guilty as sin.
I think this is why a lot of attorneys skip the probable cause hearing. Judges rarely hold the Prosecution to standards and will let it just go to trial. Judge Milton Waddams wasn't about to dispense any justice, he was just let it go through. This is why we have jury trials, because any sane jury member is going to see it for what it is. The real question is: Did the defendants have the funds available to purchase the ATV? If they didn't they are pretty much dead in the water. If they did have the funds, then it becomes complicated.
Mr. Jerome needs to be sanctioned and removed. Why is she gathering evidence in the middle of a freaking trial? She should have had her shit together prior, no?
23:43 I absolutely believe the judge made a mistake in allowing Defendants attorney anytime to gather that particular information as she would have kept moving on had co defendant attorney not jumped in inappropriately. States objection should have been held.
I agree, but the cash app evidence is more likely to work against the defendant than help his case if they subpoena to have his phone checked. It’ll show that his phone was on airplane mode.
For the first one the best part for me was watching all the reactions to the defendants crazy rantings. Everyone in the background holding area could not keep their eyes off that train wreck.
The two guys who left with a free quad are not equal witnesses as the guy who had his quad taken. When they find your wallet in my pocket, and we both disagree who pulled a gun, I think it's reasonable to assume the guy who left with two wallets had the gun.
He had plenty of time to hide the gun & the atv is on wheels so it's not difficult to push it with his accomplice onto his car. The looney-tune attorney that randomly shows up, he must be a family friend, weird though. 😮
@@cheesefriesyo No, I'm not saying that at all. You asked if the defense attorney was saying that since the co-defendants' stories matched, then they were telling the truth (please reread your original comment) and I was merely affirming to you that that was indeed what she was doing, and nothing else. I was not agreeing with her, nor was I saying that it definitely had to be that way, because, being a somewhat sensible person (despite some people's contrary opinions), I can think for myself and can think of an entirely different scenario/possibility of what might have happened. Were you making a statement that what she said was the truth? If so, why the question mark? IF it was a question, why couldn't you see and accept, that all I was doing was answering your ques question as I saw it.
@@cheesefriesyo Take it easy? I HAVE BEEN taking it easy, so far. When I'm (more or less) asked to explain something, and it is seemingly (or deliberately) misinterpreted, and I give a further, more complete, explanation, I do not appreciate being accused of going too far. While I admit that there are times when the right words to describe a situation are difficult to find, please be assured that the words used in my original comment to you were well thought out, where your response to them were to (seemingly intentionally) say that I'd said/meant the opposite of what I'd said, or at least something that was not what I meant. Evidently, I was totally mistaken to think that you, or others, would have been able to consider the fact that between the times of the interaction between the attempt to buy the ATV (with the theft and running away with it) and the return of it, as described, there was evidently sufficient time (if the two actually HAD produced a pistol/handgun) for them to have discarded the handgun and worked out a story to give about how the owner of the ATV had pulled the gun on them. It is a well-known trope that crime suspects are often going to lie and come up with some story where they are as innocent as newborn babies, when confronted about the crime, because that has been happening since the start of recorded history in crime annals, which anyone with even a single shred of common sense, or the ability to think rationally would/should be able to recognize and be aware of that simple fact! Until it has been hashed out in a court of law, nobody but those who were actually involved in the incident knows what occurred then and there, especially since there are conflicting stories about how everything went down, as there usually are, so until we actually hear/see the testimony of the case, it is all speculation about what really occurred by those who were only viewers of a preliminary hearing on the case, but were not actual witnesses to the events that the trial/hearing was about.
As someone who rides quads, All I got to say is no adult let alone a freaking child picks up a quad and puts it in the back of a truck, its called a ramp and you can literally RIDE THE QUAD UP THE RAMP! The Defendant's Lawyer was lucky the court was clueless about this fact.
@@barelyasurvivor1257 you would think the prosecutor would have specified how they moved it after the defense was bringing up doubt they could have moved it in the cross. And the officer never mentioned ramps or any testimony that cleared that up.
Attorney Porter being in her car just rubs me the wrong way. It’s not ok for Defendants and it should definitely not be ok for Attorneys. Zoom hearings are useful tools, but we really need to have rules on remote hearing etiquette.
For defendants, they may not have a quiet private place to attend the hearing other than the car. They use their phones because they don’t have laptops.
@@joshuaverkerk4532 It’s a good option especially for people who don’t live near the courthouse, who can save on gas and parking, and can minimize the time away from work. That being said I agree that there should be better decorum while in zoom court.
Some of these Atlanta attorneys really act up in court. Prosecutors and defense bump heads all the time but still manage to maintain professionalism and good working relationships to the benefit of victims, defendants, and the public. Pretty darn outrageous. Also for those that asked: GA has theft by taking, by receiving, by conversion, etc. Theft by taking is very broad. Sentencing for those sets of laws are the same, based on dollar amount of the underlying property allegedly the subject of theft.
(Assuming you are talking about the last judge) He was neither: He was patient and he stood by what he said. (Assuming you are talking about the first judge) He was also patient and didn't let the guy control anything. Chill out, not everyone is an ashhole.
It’s impossible for the prosecutor to interrupt Jerome because he never should have been talking in the first place. Judge needs to find the mute button or set a contempt hearing for the goofy one
To me, it sounds like the attorney realized his client's family would be ticked about what happened, so he felt he had to jump in and perform like that so that he could go back to the family and say he argued as much as he could but the judge wouldn't listen.
LOL! Mister Jerome asked if anyone had looked into mr. Bodies criminal past. I'm like, why would they? He was the victim? Shouldn't they be more concerned about the people that he called the cops on? And and then he said that his client called 911? When did that happen?
That 1st guy is scary and would easily bully and have a chance of harming any person out in public. 2nd case - These punks steal 4-wheelers and motorcycles and wreak havoc on the streets, neighborhoods, and freeways.
Absent a ramp, an ATV is typically loaded into a truck by lifting the front end onto the back of the truck, then moving to the rear and lifting the rear onto the truck. They are on lifting half the ATV at a time.
I mean the non-zoom equivalent of this is just walking in the courtroom while in session, walking into the well, and yelling out "I demand to discuss a new case". In any physical courtroom the CSO or Ballif would immediately move detain you. You file a motion and request a conference or request reschedule of your preliminary hearing. I heavily suspect that you cannot get bond adjusted in a conference call, but at least you may be able to plead as to why delay is causing continued hardship for a minor.
You should monitor Clayton County very closely. As I'm sure there are daily shenanigans over there. You think Fulton County's crazy Clayton County is a strong second.😂😂😂
I live in an area where ATVs are used on farms and ranches all the time. Generally when you load an ATV onto a truck, you use ramps or a board to get it on the bed, you don't lift it on. She's also changed the story from the seller holding a gun on them so they left and were scared to he followed them and pulled a gun on them. Lots of holes here.
I am not sure I would want a lawyer representing me that says "You know what I'm saying" repeatedly to the judge.
Also, if I was a Judge, attorneys would be writing a $50 check every time they said "axe" instead of "ask" in my courtroom.
@@CanadaMattGood thing you're not a judge. Our judicial system is so woefully inadequate and clogged as it is, that your idiotic solution would do nothing aside from assuaging your own ego.
Black's law dictionary defines "You know what I'm saying" as the proper antecedent phrase for an awesome legal argument.
I can’t stand that or when they say “Like” or “Um”
@@mellvee There are strict rules in court. I guess you think its ok to show up wearing a bikini too, seeing as though you know so much about the inadequisies of the legal system.
Can you imagine this happening in front of Judge Simpson? Fireworks! This lawyer should have sanctions held against him
Judge should hold that smart ass attorney in contempt…..I don’t think he handled it well. Stop letting these attorneys get by with stuff. Keep your butt out of it if not your case. He is in contempt.
"he is too small to lift it by himself"
2 sentences later- both of the young men lifted the atv into the truck together.
LOL
Sicilian mafia, Boston boss of all bosses, Free Mason... there's a whole lot of crazy going on in his head 😂😂😂
😂
That's Free Masonary... not mason or masonry. He's so special he gets an extra "a" in it.
"He's 16! He's 16! He's 16!" GREAT argument.
That was contempt all day long!!! 😮
How nice of him to show everyone else what not to do when talking to the judge
I hate to speak ill of fellow counsel, but attorney Jerome is OUTSIDE his dang mind!
Exactly my thoughts
@@TikkaT3xexcuse me? Could you be anymore racist?
@@Gringa_LWhat . ??
@@Gringa_L either TH-cam took it down or they deleted it.
If that attorney is SOOO mad about all this, why wasn't he prepared for the first hearing? I would think THATS HIS JOB to get his client out!
"You can be excused Mr. Jerome" Translation: 'begone, and don't let the door hit you where the lord split you'
It's the politest way I've heard someone say "feck off" 😊
That attorney Jerome should have been held in contempt. He’s very belligerent and intrusive. You know what I’m saying?
😹😹😹😹😹😹😹
Weak ass judges won’t do it
Good luck with the 1st guy following ANY rules of probation 😅😂😅😂
Attorney Jerome should be held in contempt and removed from the cases, as well as an ethics violation
And disbarred
For what calling out the state, there holding 2 kids in jail over a person who's filed multiple false reports, maybe look into the case before you open your mouth
@@markheckman2196the case isn’t the issue - it’s his disrespect shown to the court
You people are so weird... you have such a hard on for seeing people punished, sanctioned or admonished without knowing if they deserve it or not. It's like some sort of groupthink sociopathy or something.
@@MollyZelko2.0 he didn't disrespect anyone, it's called fighting for 2 possibly innocent kid's, that the cop never had evidence that has a gun in the first place.
I can't keep hearing Mr. Body without thinking about Clue! I'm waiting for Mrs. White or Col. Mustard to show up!
This feels like the (best) ending of the Clue movie where Tim Curry pulls out the revolver and reveals that he is Mr. Boddy.
I dont know how anyone could be a criminal defense attorney. I don't think I could ever defend someone like this who you just KNOW is guilty.
it'd be no less awful to have to prosecute someone you just KNOW is innocent.
6:28 I was honestly waiting for the judge to have a moment of flashing back to elementary school, that cut deep! 😂
Nothin like an attorney who says “you know what I’m sayin?!” Over and over again
This is fantastic, we actually have a case where one of the participants is Mr Boddy. If we had Col Mustard and Ms Scarlett in the parking lot with the ATV, it would be a TRIPLE Rainbow
I would also be willing to accept Wadsworth or Yvette the Maid
@@markieffmorris9263 I like yours better!! Anything with Yvette.....
Thank you! I was going to make the Clue reference but figured no one would get it.
@@MollyZelko2.0 cult Classic
I kept hearing that name and all I could see in my mind was Tim Curry.
They always have a funeral to go to! 😂
Good on the Dad for bringing his son back! 👏👏
Yep. It's either a funeral, or a job to start. Ridiculous
"Why am I going this way?"
"Because that's the hallway with no cameras."
++*Tazer warming up*++
Defense attorney Jerome attempted to put inaccuracies on the record. He slid into the hearing and the denied being a part of the previous hearing, so that the record would reflect that whatever was done, was done without him. He didn't know the judge would recite the actual events onto the record in response. He's not only contemptuous, he's also dishonest and totally devoid of integrity.
I absolutely hate it when I go to buy something from someone and they pull a gun on me and force me, at gunpoint, to take recreational vehicles without paying for them.
Yeah but the defendant and his accomplice both agree that’s what happened, and 2 is more than 1 so it’s the truth by math. Checkmate!
@@jennifergoodland561 You're not the sharpest, are ya
@@lescook9021You're not the best with sarcasm or humor, are you?
@@mellvee At times, no
@@lescook9021the fact that you thought the person replying to you was actually serious has me rolling😂😂😂
I love it when Mike says "it gets worse". Music to my ears.
it does sound like this young man has a father who cares that he does the right thing. it is good to hear, and so refreshing to hear about a good father for a change instead of a father with a negative reaction to his child's life. more of these good men should be talked about instead of the focus that is appointed to the bad, neglectful fathers...
Attorney Porter’s final argument is ridiculous. Two stories against one? That’s a legal argument? And why is she in what looks like a moving vehicle? Did I miss something?
When your client is guilty as charged you learn to come up with crap like that. Good work on her part honestly. What you don't want is a defense attorney that just admits they did it and doesn't try to come up with some BS. It's the way the game is played. Only time you do admit it is when they have you red handed like there's a video of the robbery happening but since no camera caught it and they didn't find the gun then it's one persons word against another. Of course the facts only add up one way but like they said if you can't pound the facts then pound the table. You just have to try to get an inch of reasonable doubt in there and then that means you can get better deals for your client even if they are guilty as sin.
I think this is why a lot of attorneys skip the probable cause hearing. Judges rarely hold the Prosecution to standards and will let it just go to trial. Judge Milton Waddams wasn't about to dispense any justice, he was just let it go through. This is why we have jury trials, because any sane jury member is going to see it for what it is. The real question is: Did the defendants have the funds available to purchase the ATV? If they didn't they are pretty much dead in the water. If they did have the funds, then it becomes complicated.
Mr. Jerome needs to be sanctioned and removed. Why is she gathering evidence in the middle of a freaking trial? She should have had her shit together prior, no?
“But don’t worry, it goes sideways.” Perked me right up.
“You gonna play like that, four eyes?” Judge: blink* blink* blink* 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 that’s clippable content right there 💰💯🤣
Rite 👍🎉
"You gonna play like that four eyes?" has got to be the harshest insult I've ever heard. The mafioso must be so proud😂
This is what happens when we allow having court via video instead of in person. This does not help our judicial system.
23:43 I absolutely believe the judge made a mistake in allowing Defendants attorney anytime to gather that particular information as she would have kept moving on had co defendant attorney not jumped in inappropriately. States objection should have been held.
IMO🤔. Don't matter what the 2 Defense comes up with... Truth can kick A$$😂
I agree, but the cash app evidence is more likely to work against the defendant than help his case if they subpoena to have his phone checked. It’ll show that his phone was on airplane mode.
Mr Body was killed in the library by a candlestick in the library. Couldn't resist the Clue reference.
Honestly this is my most watched YT channel, love the content Mike 🤘
Look here, judge, it's two against one. The robbers' stories are identical, whereas the victim's story is completely different. 🤦🏼♂️
Just means the defendants came up with a story together.
@@jamesplymire5342Yep, it's obvious.
I was looking for this comment. Her and Jerome got their law degree from the same school. 😂
Now that's a good daddy to bring his son back to the scene of the crime.
That judge should tell him "I'm rubber and you're glue...."
For the first one the best part for me was watching all the reactions to the defendants crazy rantings. Everyone in the background holding area could not keep their eyes off that train wreck.
I used to put mine in by myself. It not hard.
I did the same, when I was younger. A big Honda 4 stroke! Was a heavily S.O.B.!
First judge looks like James Cromwell.
How do you just jump into someone else’s hearing and start angrily making your case?
Hello 👋 Mike!!
Thank you for after all the work your profession involves, you take the time to bring us “the mafiosos” that belong in prison. 😂😂😂
The two guys who left with a free quad are not equal witnesses as the guy who had his quad taken.
When they find your wallet in my pocket, and we both disagree who pulled a gun, I think it's reasonable to assume the guy who left with two wallets had the gun.
He had plenty of time to hide the gun & the atv is on wheels so it's not difficult to push it with his accomplice onto his car. The looney-tune attorney that randomly shows up, he must be a family friend, weird though. 😮
I wondered if the young men have $$$ attorneys Or Court Appointed??
Hope All had A Gud long Wknd
Stay Safe 😎🎉
🇺🇸🇺🇸💥💯✅
🌟Good show. Eager to see the outcome. Hope we get to see it. 😊
They somehow ended up with an ATV they never paid for. Shocker the supposed armed robbers are claiming they didn't have a gun.
Genome should be dis barred.
Terrifying for those boys if they are innocent!
Soooo she is basically saying since there are 2 of them and their stories match then they are telling the truth? 🙄
Yes. That was what she was saying.
@jacklow9611 In that case...we could murder someone and as long as our story is the same, we are innocent 🤣
@@cheesefriesyo No, I'm not saying that at all. You asked if the defense attorney was saying that since the co-defendants' stories matched, then they were telling the truth (please reread your original comment) and I was merely affirming to you that that was indeed what she was doing, and nothing else. I was not agreeing with her, nor was I saying that it definitely had to be that way, because, being a somewhat sensible person (despite some people's contrary opinions), I can think for myself and can think of an entirely different scenario/possibility of what might have happened.
Were you making a statement that what she said was the truth? If so, why the question mark? IF it was a question, why couldn't you see and accept, that all I was doing was answering your ques question as I saw it.
@jacklow9611 Take it easy buddy.
@@cheesefriesyo Take it easy? I HAVE BEEN taking it easy, so far.
When I'm (more or less) asked to explain something, and it is seemingly (or deliberately) misinterpreted, and I give a further, more complete, explanation, I do not appreciate being accused of going too far. While I admit that there are times when the right words to describe a situation are difficult to find, please be assured that the words used in my original comment to you were well thought out, where your response to them were to (seemingly intentionally) say that I'd said/meant the opposite of what I'd said, or at least something that was not what I meant. Evidently, I was totally mistaken to think that you, or others, would have been able to consider the fact that between the times of the interaction between the attempt to buy the ATV (with the theft and running away with it) and the return of it, as described, there was evidently sufficient time (if the two actually HAD produced a pistol/handgun) for them to have discarded the handgun and worked out a story to give about how the owner of the ATV had pulled the gun on them. It is a well-known trope that crime suspects are often going to lie and come up with some story where they are as innocent as newborn babies, when confronted about the crime, because that has been happening since the start of recorded history in crime annals, which anyone with even a single shred of common sense, or the ability to think rationally would/should be able to recognize and be aware of that simple fact!
Until it has been hashed out in a court of law, nobody but those who were actually involved in the incident knows what occurred then and there, especially since there are conflicting stories about how everything went down, as there usually are, so until we actually hear/see the testimony of the case, it is all speculation about what really occurred by those who were only viewers of a preliminary hearing on the case, but were not actual witnesses to the events that the trial/hearing was about.
It's 4-5 days of binge watching LTWM.. I just can't stop.. never happened to me B4..
LOL 😆😂😆
As someone who rides quads, All I got to say is no adult let alone a freaking child picks up a quad and puts it in the back of a truck, its called a ramp and you can literally RIDE THE QUAD UP THE RAMP! The Defendant's Lawyer was lucky the court was clueless about this fact.
Yeah this is one of the few times I wholly believe the defendant.
He did not say he picked it up, he said he loaded it
@@barelyasurvivor1257 you would think the prosecutor would have specified how they moved it after the defense was bringing up doubt they could have moved it in the cross. And the officer never mentioned ramps or any testimony that cleared that up.
Some lift the front, then the rear.
Typical ignorant chimpanzees.
Judge Parker has a perfect radio voice and could, very easily, have a successful career in that field!
Depending on the size of the ATV it's absolutely possible. I'm 5'6" tall and can put an attempt in a 2 point lift.
WHY would Mr Body pull a gun on them??? To force them to take the atv??? That makes no sense.
The argument was, once Brody saw the payment fail, he pulled a gun causing the kids to flee.
@@lovesagoodpigroast3560They should have unloaded the atv. Either way, they stole it.
Attorney Porter being in her car just rubs me the wrong way. It’s not ok for Defendants and it should definitely not be ok for Attorneys. Zoom hearings are useful tools, but we really need to have rules on remote hearing etiquette.
For defendants, they may not have a quiet private place to attend the hearing other than the car. They use their phones because they don’t have laptops.
@@jescan4 They can attend Court in person. Allowing a defendant to attend a hearing via zoom is a courtesy.
@@joshuaverkerk4532 It’s a good option especially for people who don’t live near the courthouse, who can save on gas and parking, and can minimize the time away from work. That being said I agree that there should be better decorum while in zoom court.
I agree with the prosecutor; if the victim had a gun, HOW THE HECK did they manage to steal the ATV? Wow.
This is NOT HIS CASE!!! What is he talking about??? He's so rude!!!
It's amazing that they always have a funeral to go to!
His children are not listening to other adults? Man I did not see that coming. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
This Judge cracks me up with his calm demeanor and gamer headset
It would've been HILARIOUS if the judge and all officials gave the first defendent the Freemason gesture for "Say nothing". 😆
She finds it to be incredulous? Wrong word!
The correct word is "incredible."
Jail officer is loving this end rant lmao.
That other lawyer is so flustered he says his client is 15 yrs old, then he says 16 yrs old, then he says 15 yrs old 😳
I wonder if his "partner N Crime"
Is A minor...🤔😉
Some of these Atlanta attorneys really act up in court. Prosecutors and defense bump heads all the time but still manage to maintain professionalism and good working relationships to the benefit of victims, defendants, and the public. Pretty darn outrageous. Also for those that asked: GA has theft by taking, by receiving, by conversion, etc. Theft by taking is very broad. Sentencing for those sets of laws are the same, based on dollar amount of the underlying property allegedly the subject of theft.
Hi ya Mike. Missed you so much. Watched some of your older stuff. Glad you're back.😊😊
They should not have left without the cash app going through!!!!!!
Attorney Jerome has terrible courtroom manners. Wow.
hahaha, the boy's story is the owner pulled a gun on them and they STILL stole the ATV. Say what?
Misbehaving in court Mike? We're here for it! 😂
Pick up the front of the ATV and put it on the tailgate, then pick up on the back end and push it on the truck.
I absolutely can’t stand weak, impotent judges.
(Assuming you are talking about the last judge) He was neither: He was patient and he stood by what he said.
(Assuming you are talking about the first judge) He was also patient and didn't let the guy control anything.
Chill out, not everyone is an ashhole.
Cite first guy for contempt so he can serve more jail time for cursing out the judge and being so disrespectful
I agree, he's a weak ass liberal
It’s impossible for the prosecutor to interrupt Jerome because he never should have been talking in the first place.
Judge needs to find the mute button or set a contempt hearing for the goofy one
Yeah, it's utterly shameful. It's disrespectful to your own office.
I talked to a Sov Cit the other day more he talked about the Sov Cit stuff the more I lightheaded and dizzy it was mind numbing.
"You work for me." 🤣🤣🤣
I’ve been handling my sale transactions all wrong 😂
I’ve got fall on the brain. Until I’d zoomed in, I thought the defendant was attending court in a pumpkin patch! 🎃
There's no proof Abati pulled a gun on the juveniles yet she continues to state that on the record. 🤬
Defense Attorney's job.
Is the judge carrying a can of shaving foam containing dinosaur embryos?
Hey Porter that ship has sailed!!!
Wow no one must have any relations left. To listen to the defendants.
To me, it sounds like the attorney realized his client's family would be ticked about what happened, so he felt he had to jump in and perform like that so that he could go back to the family and say he argued as much as he could but the judge wouldn't listen.
I do find it hard to believe one person can lift an ATV into a vehicle.
STOP SUSPENDING THEIR SENTENCES, He obviously does not care about a formal trespass. Someone is going to get hurt, maybe an officer when he resists.
I can’t come up with a single situation when you should interrupt a judge and say that they work for you.
LOL! Mister Jerome asked if anyone had looked into mr. Bodies criminal past. I'm like, why would they? He was the victim? Shouldn't they be more concerned about the people that he called the cops on? And and then he said that his client called 911? When did that happen?
Judge gave him some rope to play with... see what knots he could get himself wound up in.
That 1st guy is scary and would easily bully and have a chance of harming any person out in public. 2nd case - These punks steal 4-wheelers and motorcycles and wreak havoc on the streets, neighborhoods, and freeways.
Im beginning to think that being in jail is party time... they keep going back like the local Wawa
Did he just say, "Freemasonary?"
I got the impression the def attorney at the end was basically trying to telegraph more details to the other Def attorney to look into.
Absent a ramp, an ATV is typically loaded into a truck by lifting the front end onto the back of the truck, then moving to the rear and lifting the rear onto the truck. They are on lifting half the ATV at a time.
Mike, it has begun. Little Cottonwood got a nice little holiday snowstorm.
Some people cant control themselves, law degree or not.
I mean the non-zoom equivalent of this is just walking in the courtroom while in session, walking into the well, and yelling out "I demand to discuss a new case". In any physical courtroom the CSO or Ballif would immediately move detain you. You file a motion and request a conference or request reschedule of your preliminary hearing. I heavily suspect that you cannot get bond adjusted in a conference call, but at least you may be able to plead as to why delay is causing continued hardship for a minor.
You should monitor Clayton County very closely. As I'm sure there are daily shenanigans over there. You think Fulton County's crazy Clayton County is a strong second.😂😂😂
3:12 you know what actual Sicilian Mafioso doesn’t do? Admit that they’re Sicilian Mafioso.