ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ก.ย. 2024
- NYU Law Professor Melissa Murray and Ali Velshi discuss the US Supreme Court case on the SEC and why it could have wide-reaching impacts on the powers of the so-called administrative state and the functioning of our government, stripping agencies of authority. The case “has the potential to completely upend the way government as we know it is run,” Murray explains. “There’s a lot riding on this… it does not just effect the SEC, it impacts a lot of federal agencies.”
» Subscribe to MSNBC: on.msnbc.com/Su...
Follow MSNBC Show Blogs
MaddowBlog: www.msnbc.com/...
ReidOut Blog: www.msnbc.com/...
MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House, The ReidOut, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and Alex Wagner who brings her breadth of reporting experience to MSNBC primetime. Watch “Alex Wagner Tonight” Tuesday through Friday at 9pm Eastern.
Connect with MSNBC Online
Visit msnbc.com: on.msnbc.com/Re...
Subscribe to the MSNBC Daily Newsletter: MSNBC.com/NewslettersTH-cam
Find MSNBC on Facebook: on.msnbc.com/Li...
Follow MSNBC on Twitter: on.msnbc.com/Fo...
Follow MSNBC on Instagram: on.msnbc.com/In...
#SupremeCourt #SEC #Government
What happens when the government is purchased by a few.
We're about to find out.
You mean: THIS IS _what happens when government is purchased by a few._
We saw a taste of what would happen during the "presidency" of the Manchurian Cantaloupe, namely a "government" that is incompetent and corrupt to its very core.
Thats what repubs are trying to do..
Are we not there now?
Let's call it "Removing checks and balances on powerful self-interest." It's important how this is described as it is about to be sold to most ordinary folks as "Increasing freedom".
Exactly. They are after the SEC and the USDA . Both of which were created to protect us from greedy business owners harming us in their reach for more money and power. This is more dangerous than some realize. The conversation needs to focus on the issues that existed BEFORE these agencies existed. And when is someone going to call BS on these judges? They aren't even legally allowed to go after these agencies. It's waaaaay outside their list of powers
I totally agree. Every GOP is a huge crook.
Small Government for large corporations and the Executive Class........ Huge Government for personal rights and freedoms.....
Well said.
Easily answers the question of Rich vs Poor.
You're delusional
Cut government to 1800 levels
Trump Scorched Earth 2024
Because you earned it
Does that apply to the right of health? Because who is going to stop the corporations from polluting, much less stop that. I also wonder about personal rights and freedoms since America has been losing those at a record pace with those on the right trying to ban anything and everything they don't morally approve of? This make America move closer to Iran with their ridiculous morality police.
💯 fascism. No thank you let's vote for democracy.
Heritage foundation and federalist society should not be allowed an opinion on scotus nominees. All nominations should be approved by the American Bar Association.
BAR is unconstitutional - British Attorney Registry , The Crown loves the control of its subjects
Lawyers are bad enough ,Don't add to their criminal reputation
It seems to me that conservatives saw what the Court did in _Brown v. Board,_ _Roe v. Wade,_ etc., and said to themselves, "Well, shucks, if we stuff that with our guys, we can do whatever we want through them!"
Like Democrats have been doing for decades
No it has been the Biden administration and Democrat representatives who have been playing the people. With all their fake pathetic little causes. America First, American citizens first. Trying to get the tax payers to pay their ignorant ideas they used to get votes. Take care of our homeless and our vets. Don't sit there and cut funding for education and police for American citizens for fake votes
This would enable corruption worse than it already is :(
Regulation is what prevents these robber barons from getting all your money. Of course they are against it.
Gilded Age 2.0
Indeed, the people who do not want it are the ones who would not be responsible in the first place. Part of how trump kept business happy ans stock market up were deregulation. Cost taxpayers 20 billion bailing out the community banks that failed and unknown cost to human life with train derailment from deregulation of railroad safety standards.
Regulation = protection
Deregulation ends protections for the people.
And they still do it.
They gonna get it regardless when they have the govt in their pocket.
Really tired of these unelected jerks changing everything according to their will 😠
"The Heritage Foundation is completely dedicated to increasing the wealth and power of its ultra-rich funders, at the expense of working people. It is packed with corporate cash and uses that money to heavily influence politicians as they consider legislation discussed and passed in Congress. Big bankers, real estate developers, hedge-fund owners and CEOs from businesses serve on its Board of Trustees. The Heritage Foundation, with its donors and partners, not only attacks workers but also supports policies against the environment, communities of color and women. It promotes a laundry list of regressive ideas, including: • Sick leave policies should be eliminated; • Economic inequality doesn’t exist; • Social Security and the minimum wage should be eradicated, calling the latter “a toll” on the work- force." DOES THIS SOUND SCARY?? VOTE BLUE 2024!!! FOR OUR DEMOCRACY
Always vote blue to preserve our democracy and freedom!
read about Project 2025 by Heritage Foundation. Destruction of Democracy.
cpousa has your same agendas and goals, Outstanding
Communist Party of the United States of America New York NY. Treasonous Club indeed.
NO QUESTION !
It's tragic that our party is failing us: we need better candidates. If we lose '24, it's on us.
Extremely concerning now that we have an ultra right SCOTUS, willing & wanting to be rid of anything that will protect citizens from harm.
So we'll have to have major catastrophes over and over. No regulations for rail, air and sea.
In the last days the wize men will become as fools .
The dumbing down lines up with cutting education efforts and history education out of core curriculum. If no one understands how the state works they can shred the law and personal rights. You'll never miss what you never knew you had.
Exactly. It's been the focus of the Republicans for more than 5 decades to dumb down the citizenry through huge cuts in education, packing the courts with lemmings who will uphold these actions, and now that that has been successful, it's time to start with book banning, which leads to the ability to rewrite history.
The people who are fighting against regulations are those who would profit from an Old West type of free for all in business. Cut throat is actually an admirable quality with the rich. Issues that are popular with the masses are targeted by business to rile the voters into voting for their candidates - in short, a smoke screen to get their guy in. Having worked for 2 Federal agencies and a vast array of private businesses, I can call this one.
That is so true. They make money if they can pollute freely and not have to clean it up or take accountability for killing people or making them sick.
They'll abolish all food safety regulations, and then make it illegal for anyone to grow food except the corporations.
16 tons
They aren't just fighting they've formed coalition and have paid representatives... See these businesses LOVE UNIONS... Only for them of course
Competition is an admirable quality with the rich. Cut throat is using regulations to eliminate competition. Voters have agency. They are responsible for their vote, not the rich. If you're concerned about smoke screens, demand transparency. Stop relying on unelected, unaccountable beurocrats.
Ever since Ronald Reagan was in office, this country has had to put up with the loud voices of people who hate government even though they benefit from it and wonder where it is when there's an emergency. smh
Reagan was just Trump with better PR.
yeah we need 80 thousand more irs agents
@jjones3467 We needed them more than we needed a useless border wall. The increase in IRS funding has already had tangible benefits, such as an increased efficiency of customer service, and the beginnings of a free online tax filing service run by the government.
@@jjones3467Yes - we do need more agents. Most are being used to dig into the all the shell companies millionaires and billionaires are using to dodge taxes. So far they've collected over 160 million dollars in back taxes from around 100 millionaires! And some of these agents will replace people who will be retiring over the next few years.
@@jjones3467taxes are part of being able to have a functional government. If you don’t want roads, electricity, food supplies, hospitals, police, fire departments or an army you may be able to find some African nation that suites you.
SCOTUS ; the best supreme court money can buy.
That would be Sotomeyer and her book deal and shake down.
@@douglasreagan4979 You forgot Uncle Thomas and his "Free rent fo his momma."
As well as many other thousands upon thousands of dollars.
thomas has got his and thereaint nothing you can do about it.. he flips the bird to ordinary americans with his little sneer.@@TimeSurfer206
@@TimeSurfer206 Dont forget the Biden crime family!
If any of it is for sale it's all for sale 😢
Yes, Congress nor the Supreme Court have the level of knowledge or expertise to determine the fundamentals of environmental science, food science, tax accounting, and on and on. Amy Coney Barret specifically stated this regarding her understanding of clean air. Also, administrative codes are scrutinized by elected politicians prior to becoming law which is where they should be addressing their concerns.
Another rich guy willing to upend government for his own convenience?
"Land of the free and the home of the PAID"
Another fraudster who will burn everything down for the “right” to take others’ money without consequences.
That's how fascism works. And corrupt whores know who their best donors are.
If you're not outraged and terrified you're not paying attention.
Remember what Mitch Maconel said know that Donald Trump a private citizen there's no special powers that can protect him if he may have committed crimes against America and Americans...
Outraged and terrified are both key symptoms of being a liberal/progressive these days LOL.
@JWolfsVids not true at all I'm not terrified but that doesn't mean I don't pay attention. I just know that this shut happens all the time throughout history.
I remember hearing forty-plus years ago that we would be overtaken from within.
Voting Blue is not about siding with one party or another; it comes down to trying to save our democratic ways.💙
Nope
@@josephjones825
Did you support Trump's attempts to overturn a democratic election?
45 years ago, Biden was middle aged. Think about that.
@@winstonsmith6607 And Trump was a whole lot younger?
@@winstonsmith6607and still lied when he ran for president. CBS and ABC put him on blast for it.
Admit it! Republicans did warn us about activist judges....
EVERY.SINGLE.ACCUSATION. IS.A.CONFESSION.
Every single Democrat is a Communist
cpousa = Look it up Skippy @@user-th1pv6ks5o
As long as you fear integrity and accountability, you are NOT the good guys!
This is what billionaires have done to our Republican politicians.
oh it was also the unholy alliance of evangelical white power and the GOP in the 1980s under reagan
Ask Congress all Democrats and Republicans
Life style audit, Let the chips fall as they will
Trump Scorched Earth 2024
Because YOU earned it
Not like they weren’t
Willing victims.
They were pretty cheap. Dollar store cheap.
As if the Democrats aren't corrupt to the core, all they do is make money disappear!
So a group of ill-informed amateurs who are politically appointed have given themselves the right to make wholesale changes to the country, against the will of the majority without a proper public discourse on the matter would seem to be a pretty radical if not unethical maneuver and should fall well outside the position of the SCOTUS. This is an administrative matter and they have strayed too far from their constitutionally assigned duties.
45 did that he put loyalist’s in those position to take the agencies down from the inside, people who had no education or experience in these positions. Like when he listened to quacks instead of Dr Fauci a leading expert on infectious disease, because he cared more about people agreeing his position that unnecessary cost more lives, between 100,000 and 200,000 lives that could have been saved but were lost to 45’s negligence.
Welcome to the "freest, greatest country on earth" /s
That was a LOT of words.
@@goodtroublemaker143 Maybe you'd like it better if they did like they did for Donnie and add more pics and less words.............stay ignorant my friend!
@@goodtroublemaker143 Yes,it was; and all of them were well-chosen, spelled correctly, and organized coherently. It was a pleasure to read a TH-cam comment written by someone who paid attention in school, and continues to use that knowledge to communicate important ideas. Thanks to @circuitman37 !
How can we have three EQUAL branches of government if one branch can overrule the other two knowing its interpretations of the constitution are subjective and cannot be challenged.
Or,6 conservative and 3 liberal Supreme Court judges 😊
Exactly
It's a balancing act. Right now the executive branch has far more power than the Constitution intends. SCOTUS is trying to bring it back in line with how it was intended, giving the power of creating law back to Congress. If Congress wants stricter laws, Congress must pass those laws. That way if We The People don't like those laws, we can replace those Congressman and women with other people who will represent us better. Right now, there is no way for We The People to hold the executive branch goverment agencies accountable without onesy-twosy years-long court cases.
You obviously don't understand how it works. Each branch has the power to keep the other in check and have in the past. If SCOTUS interpretation of laws is not liked, Congress can change the laws and etc.
@@AndyMartin-n6jand if the supreme court interpretation of the law doesn't agree with the supreme court interpretation of the law they will change their interpretation...
And if Congress didn't like the way the agencies were operating they could change the way they are operating, without the supreme court needing to step in
Without a functioning system or the rule of law, capital flight from the US will be crippling
Keep fighting for the protections and rule of law !!!
I think it might go the opposite way.
That would be true, except... protective systems and the rule of law will still be there for the wealthy, elite, and powerful. It's everyone else who gets hung out to dry. So the interests of the Capital classes will be pretty happy.
This government was setup for failures by stealing landbases and resources from Indigenous populations and selling or still looting it today for to international communities as stolen properties which going to government upside down. It's been going down ever since Mayflower docked. Have at it
Who says it's functioning now? Cashless bail crooked DAs
Political opponents jailed
DoJ FBI active in committing crime and covering up crime as ordered
Treason and Misprision of treason
This is terrifying. Rich entitled people want even less accountability.
Stripping the Federal State of the ability to examine an issue, to determine the facts and arrive at an appropriate remedy will have the knock-on effect of stripping (in turn) the individual State of those same abilities, and (in turn) the District or County of the same. In the end, you will have chaos.
At,s what they want to destroy the country..Trump lovers are to blame.
oh no, they love when they deny u rights at a state level. they only hate when their rich buddies are bothered by the federal bodies while stealing
_“Stripping the Federal State of the ability to examine an issue, to determine the facts and arrive at an appropriate remedy will have the knock-on effect of stripping (in turn) the individual State of those same abilities, and (in turn) the District or County of the same. In the end, you will have chaos.”_
Yep… can you say _‘a snowball rolling down a hill?’_
This has been the long-game of the then millionaire (now billionaire) conservative class since the end of WWII (Eisenhower warned you in 1961), but it only really gained traction during the Reagan era with that conman's sales pitch of _“trickle-down economics”_ - a.k.a. _“Reaganomics”_ - sold to gullible, stupid voters (the idea that if only the rich were wealthier, their wealth would miraculously _“trickle-down”_ the economic food chain, to the economically disadvantaged).
If there is a truism about wealth accumulation, it is, the more you have, the more insatiable your desire, for even greater wealth, becomes. In a world where EVERYTHING is for sale-when even the clean-air you breathe is no longer free-it can and will, most inevitably, be owned by a privileged few or one individual (or family).
_“The modern conservative is not even especially modern. He is engaged in one of man’s oldest, best financed, most applauded, and, on the whole, least successful exercises in moral philosophy: the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.”_ -John Kenneth Galbraith (1908-2006), Canadian-American economist, diplomat, and author of “Wealth and Poverty”.
Heather Cox Richardson makes a compelling point in her works when she points out the American conservative movement has been playing the long-game of re-institutionalising slavery (albeit not based upon racial slavery, but on economic slavery) through privileged lawlessness and underprivileged law enforcement-where the law applies only to the enslaved and not the slave owners.
In America, you have a deliberately created a “poorly educated” (Dementia J Trump) population (a 2020 US Dept. of Education report found that 75% of adult Americans possess the literacy skills of 6th-graders or less). You have been fed sporting distractions from middle-school into adulthood. More money is spent on sport in public schools in the US, than in academics-than in raising the academic levels of students; than of teaching kids how to read, write or do maths, let alone make them media-savvy or responsible, critically thinking citizens.
Being a gullible, obedient “team-player” is more important to the overseers, than being a rational, critically thinking individual.
The GOP despises everything that leads to accountability.
The gdp cares about nothing but money. Period
Yes. Chat with an average "Republican (Conservative) on the street" and it doesn't take long to pick up on the fact that the picture in their mind whenever they use the term "freedom" is akin to the USA being a 100% "open," anything-goes environment (but only for their "right kind of people," of course). Kinda along the lines of those "free port" states making appearances in depictions of the olden days of Caribbean pirates and plunderers.
Republicans asked for GAO as an overseer with Ukraine funds early on.
Democrats said no that this was emergency money needed and no time for accountability. Go figure. 10% for the big guy.
Google that statement
😂😅 Now that is so funny coming from a democrat. Your boy has our borders open, putting us at risk. He should have been removed already for not upholding the OATH he took. This entire nation is in chaos and Democrats go day by day blind!! So let's talk about ignoring ACCOUNTABILITY.
Oh, the supreme court is hearing a case? We'll start the bidding at unlimited vacations and flights. Heck, I'll throw in a house in Switzerland.
Yes, at that point the U.S. would not longer be a safe place to live, or even habitable.
@@Crazywaffle5150 He's talking about gifts to the Supreme court Justices. See Clarence Thomas.
If people acted according to the rules and policed themselves, then we wouldn’t need so many regulatory agencies. Unfortunately the greediness of humans demands regulations!
I.m so grateful that there are people like Ali and Melissa who can understand the significance of what is going on and keep us informed . Thank You .
Yes, and I'm so grateful for all the people who go to their county Democratic party headquarters and help Democrats win elections. We all need to go to our county headquarters and offer our time, energy, enthusiasm, encouragement, friendship, talent, and support to help Democrats win.
@@scofah Help them win and do nothing but offer lip service like they have for the last 75 years or so.
Some people want a lawless country
NO SEC???????
BERNIE MADOFF would still be out RIPPING OFF innocent victims.
how is that a good thing?
And would be the first to dial 911.
Rich people do.
America is dying a slow death,most people will not notice until it's too late. The only question left to answer is, will we be like Russia or the Soviet Union? My guess is we'll be more like Russia, an oligarchy, but I can see us being like the U.S.S.R., a military ran society. But my biggest fear is we will tear ourselves to pieces and take most of the world out too. We are in trouble guys.
Senile Joe to the rescue 😴
Worse we will be like America of the 1850's
Lol. You should write Hallmark cards. If you think for one moment that the Majority will hand our Country over...think again, Comrade.
@@basedgamerguy818
We already are. Wealth inequality has returned to the levels during the Gilded age of the robber barons.
Big trouble wake up peoplel watch ye back .The Devil has ben turnd loose .He has only a short time to do his dirty work.
The court system should be carefull what they wish for because there won’t be a need for them also
People forget. These rules & regulations are fought hard for, to protect the people from injuries. From known injurious behaviors, all in the quest for profit at the expense of people. Corporations ALWAYS want less regulations, but they have proven they won't do it on their own. People are more important than profits.
Constitutional review... You're a nitwit like when Row V Wade was sent to the States...Powers of Government Limited...
explain to me the hard pressing issue of the pistol brace rule ? how was it fought hard for ? How does it actualy make us safer? How does it not disarm disabled people ? How does the rule making not violate by making Criminal an act with out legislative authority that is solely delegated by the people to Law Makers not Bureaucrats ? Tell me of this democracy which is not found anywhere in either the anti federalist or federalist papers .
Government is controlled by the ruling capitalist class who only act in the popular will to rein in renegades who threaten the capitalist class overall ability to make profits. Government wasn't set up because people are more important than profits. The ruling capitalist class obviously sees profits more important than the working class unless faced with class struggle
Voting is like driving, you want to go forward, you vote D, if you want to go backwards, you vote R. It's really that simple.
It really is that simple, now more than ever. If you want to go back to the 1930's and everything that came afterwards, Hitler, Mussolini, World WarII, go ahead and vote R. Just remember you'll have to hand over your kids for God & Country. If you've gotten this far, that won't bother you.
@@elenalatici9568
R stands for Regression.
Civics 101: Election winners make the laws, set the punishments, and shape the judiciary. 98% of all elections are won by a R or a D. So I vote for Democrats. It's not about Biden vs. Trump. It's about Democrats vs. Republicans.
@@jfverboom7973 A vote either Party is a vote for war and depresion.
The left wants to segregate schools.
SCOTUS Judge to 911: My neighbor is burning rubber tires. The smell is just awful!
Operator: Sorry. There’s no law against that anymore.
Also the operator: But you can always sue your neighbor. Then the case will be appealed all the way up to the SCOTUS, so they can decide if burning tires is unconstitutional or not. Likely it will be okay, since the framers never bothered about tires… Because tires hadn’t been invented yet.
It's called a nuisance fire I was told 🔥
@@abrakkehakka1357 Likely… air traffic control towers will also be declared unconstitutional thanks to the silly needs of the 20th century.
I really am glad to see you VELSHI . I really enjoy your information you share, thank you sir.
Life would be unlivable without rules and regulations determined necessary by the specialized "administrative" departments. Obviously all regulations need constant oversight and often revision, like everything else.
How do these right wing unelected judges get to change how our government works when they won’t even have ethics rules? SCOTUS should not be an executive branch. When Trump was elected in 2016, I immediately worried about SCOTUS. I. saw this coming. I voted for Hillary knowing that SCOTUS was at risk.
CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW - Lawful Power State, Lawful Power Federal, Lawful power People, Nothing More
America, bought and sold like every other Commodity .
all the smart people saw this coming
Interesting statement considering the supreme court just said unelected agencies can't make laws🤣
We need to get these judges out of the supreme court before they destroy everyone’s freedoms.
Expand the court. And transfer some SCOTUS judges to the FISA or Tax Courts.
To late.Trun the US over we done.
@@david4096Never
Too little, too late!
@@boborsini433 what's it like being a troll? Knowing that is all you will ever be...
Lordy, I despise the Republican Party. They truly don’t care about the individual citizen. Vote blue forever!
NO SEC???????
BERNIE MADOFF would still be out RIPPING OFF innocent victims.
how is that a good thing?
No but big corps will have free reign if the repubs win. It's to their advantage as well so they will work hard to convince your citizens this is awesome thing to do and have yoi vote against your own best interest
Don't be naive. The Democratic Party doesn't care either.
Politicians care about themselves. Whatever keeps them in office is what they *say* they support.
I refuse your vicious and sickening hate.
@@myohmy7368congratulations 😂
These unelected, bought and paid for grifters are playing with fire.
Thank you for the information and the urgency of fighting for a democratic administration and Senate and House.
The supreme court should not be set x number of judges appointed for life. It should be a random selection of x number of federal court judges chosen on a case by case basis as needed. Imagine if the idea of the supreme court as it currently is did not exist and was pitched today. No one would say yes to it. It's time for a change.
The same argument could be made for a lot of our system of government. No modern democratic nation would suggest opportioning representation by square mileage (The Senate), or tying election results to whether certain regions once allowed slavery (Electoral College), yet we seem to be stuck with this archaic system, because a great many individuals believe that the Founders created a perfect instrument of government in The Constitution, even though those same Founders were completely aware that the needs and requirements of our Republic would change over time, and built the ability to reflect that change within The Constitution itself.
@@TheJrr71 Sounds like there are lots of changes that need to happen.
@@fearalice I believe so. I'm also a realist, so I'm aware of the impractibility of trying to make sweeping changes to our system of government. We need to look at what is achievable and move forward from there.
Something which is actually progressing right now, is the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC). This acts as a go-around to the Electoral College, by assigning a States electors to whoever wins the popular vote in the Presidential election. This doesn't require a Constitutional Ammendment, just each State to adopt it. It doesn't even need all the State's, just enough to meet the EC cut off of 270 "votes". So far, it has States with 205 EC "votes", so there is still some way to go.
Another achievable goal, is to create truly independent election regulators, within States. So that redistricting is no longer a partisan issue. Again, this is something that can be done at the State level.
By making voting fairer and more transparent, we should be able to move on to things such as reversal of Citizens United, which would create even more fairness and transparency, which would, hopefully lead to better governance for all Americans.
But, we have to start with what we can achieve right now, which is limited, but still a foundation for improvement.
Yes, deregulation of the railroads has stimulated the economy. The companies who clean up after derailments have benefited most.
If corporate America can cut corners, they will. They don’t care about the people unless those people find ways to negatively impact their bottom line. Regulations do exactly that.
Our government needs to be as large as necessary to serve the people effectively and efficiently. Cutting services that are critical to millions of citizens isn't appropriate and causes deep and tragic consequences.
Its called Checks and Balances something Americans learn in elementary or Middle School that the GOP obviously did not learn?
We need another season of "Are you smarter than a 5th grader GOP edition"
The SEC is an independent federal agency, established pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, headed by a five-member Commission. The Commissioners are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate
NO SEC???????
BERNIE MADOFF would still be out RIPPING OFF innocent victims.
how is that a good thing?
Imagine a world where SCOTUS were activists and stepped in political issues. 😏 Let's have term limits.
Impeachment
Draft the Constitutional Amendment then. You do know it would take a Constitutional Amendment to have term limits on the Supreme Court of the United States. The lifetime appointment is set down in the Constitution. Our Founding Fathers had great insight
You have that NOW ! !
WE don't have to imagine........
lets replace the two Fmr. President Donald Trump got in and the one President Joe Biden got in .
@@heyyall1912They can't replace a Supreme Court Justice, but there's no reason Biden can't appoint three more. The Constitution doesn't have any limit on how many justices there can be.
I love it when MSNBC takes us to school! - great segment!
...and what is the first thing a court would do if it were faced with the question of whether or not someone was incorrectly fined for breaking a federal statute? Well, they'd turn to the very expert witnesses employed by the government in the FDA, FCC, EPA, etc. The only way this lawsuit makes sense is if _courts were no longer interested in evidence..._ which is exactly how the GOP supermajority on the US Supreme Court seems to be operating.
what they are not telling you is this is going to get rid of Chevron Doctrine. They are worried that these agencies are going to actually have to Ask Permission and explain why they need a Rule in place or law and have it voted on and Educate congress because it means that they could be found in contempt if they misrepresent any data.
@@TheXanderGrim
Abolishing the Chevron doctrine would require Congress to micro manage EVERY rule and statute. That is not tenable and Republicans know this. Proposals like these are not in good faith.
People will rue the day, that happens.
@jfverboom7973 chevron can be overturned by scotus, it based on a court case not a law .
Did the congress make these make these regulations? Then they should regulate them. The Supreme Court should only determine if the punishment fit the crime. They can barely spell justice and are by no means capable of determining the needs of the people since they clearly live in a different world.
Sad to see these critical regulatory checks and balances being undermined.
This should show a all American that the Supreme Court is the best paid court Money can buy with 6 conservative judges Also the importance to vote. Had americans been voting you we would not have this supreme court in 2023 ❓️❓️❓️❓️❓️12 3 23
It NEVER ends with these far right extremists in our Supreme Court. I hope someday there is a time limit on age, rules & regulations set for scotus or we need to pack the court!
It is time to add more justices to the Supreme Court these for supreme court justices that are making these rulings are being paid by billionaires in the Republican Party to do their bidding either we move them or we add more justices, but either way it’s time for them to go..
I have absolutely no respect or confidence in the us Supreme Court. Who thought it was a good idea to give someone a job for life?
Well, the Founders. It was a time when morality, personal and professional integrity and patriotism meant something.
Exactly. They are as flawed as the next person
@@TheMangoMussolini It was also a time when people didn't live much beyond 60 (if they were lucky) so there was higher turnover of judges.
@@YaxKukMo1426Quite so...even worse than you say, life expectancy in North America in the late 1700s was 36... very high turnover hehe
One reason the government grew so much is to protect its citizens from corporations & it's oligarchs who continues to take advantage of its employees, the environment, the public's trust, etc...
SCOTUS should have no say in this matter. It should only be adjudicated by Congress. If that's possible.
The kangaro congress is in Trumps pocket to.
Preventing the government from functioning and self-regulating is a foundational duty of the modern Republican Party.
Which part ?? The house or senate???
Congress on the whole has shown they have no problem supporting criminals and sh!tting on the Constitution, so NO!
That’s literally why SCOTUS has a say.
The legislative branch forms a department.
The legislative department forms executive agencies.
The purpose of the courts is to check the administrative powers of the agencies.
This is such a sobering report. I think everyone should be made aware of the serious ramifications of this case.
Of what possible value is that? "Everyone" knew about Our Hitler but elected him anyway. "Everyone" knew he committed crimes, in the open and in plain sight, but did nothing. "Everyone" knew the Orange Stain is a fascist seeking to overturn the republic and institute a kleptoautocracy, and yet he's the frontrunner for the Retrumplican nomination. How exactly does information to the ridiculously ignorant public do any good at all?
Corporatocracy
No worries Ali, Time 5:15 you concisely explained the subject.
It is good that you explained these govt agencies have oversight by congressional appointees something opponents of big govt do not mention in order to scare the public
Well, it’s now at the the Supreme Court, where Harlan Crow will make the final decision.
This Supreme Court is too stressful. So many cases are becoming near-existential crises.
And protect retirements. Even the rich might find themselves destroyed by allowing unchecked corruption of investment firms.
Those who took an oath to protect & uphold the constutution & instead wirk to dusmantle it need to be taken out of office.
This is what happens when you mix politics and religion.
Who prevents Congress's inside trading?
No such thing. They have exempted themselves from everything
Pretty sure insider trading is legal when your in congress.
@user-th1pv6ks5o, I hope you’re joking-I’m pretty sure it’s not.
@@williamrappaport9203 It is completely legal for congress to trade on inside information. There have been various efforts to legislate, but they have all failed. Legalized insider trading for elected officials.
@@OhNoNotAgain42 I remember when someone asked Pelonis if it should be stopped and she threw up her arms and said “oh, no,no”.
Lots of troll bots out, how's the vodka comrades? 🤣
😆
I also still believe in Russia collusion.🤪
They will answer once they have finished their Borscht.
If you're an American, you'll soon find out.
Just a couple with multiple accounts suffering from MPD.
So, just a minute now...
With the backlog in the Courts, wouldn't allowing jury trials for these types of matters impinge upon the rights of EVERYONE to (timely) jury trials?
How is THAT Constitutional?
What are you referring to? This is about The Supremes, not a trial court. You do understand that SCOTUS isn't in the business of conducting trials, right? Whatever cases they hear have no impact on the timing of lower court trials.
@@TheMangoMussolini The issue is whether the Applicant has a Constitutional right to a JURY trial for a matter that would ordinarily be determined by a regulatory body, like the EPA or OSHA. If it is determined that they have that right (at whatever level it would be tried), then precedent would be set such that EVERYONE would have that right, thus increasing the amount of litigation already proceeding through the Courts at large, increasing the backlog, and robbing other litigants of the right to a jury trial, on account of delays not within their control, which typically ends up in matters being thrown out.
SCOTUS is not going to conduct the trials, of course, but it is their prerogative in the case at hand to determine whether such litigants have the RIGHT to a jury trial, and whether regulatory proceedings and tribunals are then essentially moot.
I understand quite a bit about it. You?
@@Khrystyna853 Gosh, no, I don't...because I don't see it the same way as you, I must therefore not understand. Now, here's the way it is in reality, let me know if you can't grasp the full meaning:
Generally speaking, a person (including a corporation) that is directly impacted by a regulatory decision made by a government agency or decision maker has the right to challenge that decision by way of an application in court for judicial review.
Hmmm...maybe I DO understand quite a bit about it after all.
@@TheMangoMussolini Yes, they can apply for judicial review, but not for a jury trial. That is the matter at hand. If you understand so much, what is it about my original comment to which you don't understand the reference?
@@Khrystyna853How many angels can dance on the head of a pin? You want to play hairsplitting games. According to the Supreme Court, the jury-trial right applies only when "serious" offenses are at hand, petty offenses don't invoke it. For purposes of this right, a serious offense is one that carries a potential sentence of more than six months' imprisonment. (Baldwin v. New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970). What is being argued now is NOT about jury trials, it is about the interpretation of the Chevron Doctrine, the interpretation of which has allowed the SEC, and every other regulatory agency, to make their rulings. This case is simply the third case to be lumped into this review, the other two cases deal with the same issue (Loper v. Raimondo, and Murray v. UBS Securities) having already been selected for review.
Demanding the right to a jury trial in order to be convicted of violating regulations is hardly the same as demanding regulation enforcement agencies be dismantled. If the SEC has the evidence he committed fraud, why shouldn't they have to prove it the way law enforcement is required to prove that someone is guilty of bank fraud or wire fraud? Requiring agencies to prove their charges sounds perfectly logical to me.
What will America look like when informed conversations about the justification of authority are stifled by those incapable of having those conversations?
Note that it is always "regulation" generally that they are against. They never specify which exact regulations they hate, and (more importantly) WHY. Because the answer is (in *every* case) a variation on: "prohibiting passing the consequences of our money-making activities on to vulnerable people, impacts our profits."
I remember when being a Supreme Court Justice was an honorable thing. The people should have the power to dismiss Justices who misrepresent themselves prior to being appointed and who do not keep to the highest standards of ethics once appointed. The people need to take back their power over all branches of government and clean house!
Funny how every institution that the Democrats doesn't control seems to be "broken". God, you people are so lame.
When,when they made the insular cases basically making Puerto Ricans second class citizens,or in korematsu when they allowed detention of japanese or in all their racist rulings in the 18/19hundreds,,,if u don't like a law,amend it,don't expect the SC to legislate,Chevron was a wrong decision,it should have been overturned same to this one,the statute specifically says the statute of limitation starts from the time of accrual,what's there to interprate there
If billionaires and corporations can't do it through the executive branch they'll do it with the courts.
this is so scary 😔
"Why Conversation become convinced they cannot win democratically they won't abandon Conversatism, they will abandon Democracy "
-David Trump Republican Advisor to President Bush
David Frum, not Trump. Autocorrect error?
_”"Why Conversation become convinced they cannot win democratically they won't abandon Conversatism, they will abandon Democracy " -David Trump Republican Advisor to President Bush”_ [sic]
Do you even know how to write a coherent English sentence? There was no-one called "David Trump" working for Bush Jr. The person responsible for the quote, which you've butchered and mangled btw, is _David Frum,_ a Canadian-American conservative political commentator and a former speechwriter for President George W. Bush-he was never one of Bush's “advisors”. He coined the phrase “axis of evil” which appeared in Bush's State of the Union address on January 29th, 2002.
The quote you're trying to convey is from Frum's book *Trumpocracy: The Corruption of the American Republic* (2018)
It states: _“If conservatives become convinced that they can not win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. They will reject democracy.”_
And not conversation. Really worth reading before you post.
It's time for the corrupt old crooks to resign, or be charged with they're crimes. (NO CREDEBILITY)
I am so sick of hearing about judges. At this point, with trump appointees from bottom to top making rulings with obvious political bias, the institution of the courts should be considered partisan and corrupt.
You know how to solve that right? 2A
Let's not forget how Mitch McConnell refused to place any judges, not just on the Supreme Court.
This supreme court should be disbanded and new members should be elected.their peers. No more apointments. Term limits for all govt elected officials including judges. No more than 2 terms for anyone.
👍 No more career politicians making easy money off the American taxpayer! 🤑
You mean subvert the Constitution in order to prevent it from being subverted?
This path leads to a scary dystopian future.
We stepped onto that path after the 2015 presidential election.
Our Constitution requires Congress to make laws not government agencies.
The GOP House can't even get Appropriations Bills to fund the government done. No thanks. I'll go with the gov't agencies.
Regulations are not laws.. and believe me. You want those regulations in place.. it’s what separates first world countries like the US from less developed nations that have constant catastrophes because stuff wasn’t built right or done safely. What they are trying to do only serves to save the very rich some coin, the everyday working man will lose big if they are successful in dismantling these agencies.
You skipped the class on "How Government Works and Why" didn't you. Maybe you can do some refresher reading at Article II, Section 2, Clause 2.
How,s that the SC fault,,,pple call for accountability to everyone but themselves,vote for better leaders if u have a problem with how congress runs
This is just frustrating
Mehdi Hasan would have something to.. oh, wait.
That's an uncommon Russian name, Sam.
@@dannmarceau which terrorists do you support? The Israeli terrorists or the Palestinian terrorists?
@@dannmarceau nothing to say, kiddo? Didn't £*¢*ing think so.
Thank you!
Thank you for highlighting this case.
Their aim is not deregulation as stated, that is the smoke screen for their actual aim which is deconstruction.
Great analytical commentary!! An urgent warning for us all!
2 million staff in a country that size is a TINY number! No wonder the US is such a mess! It's desperately understaffed!
Thank you for reporting this
It is completely impossible for government to function in the interests of the public without the ability to act in a more agile manner than Congress will ever be possible of doing. There absolutely must be bodies that are capable of acting quickly and decisively to fulfill their roles. If every time someone committed a crime, Congress would have to pass a law specifically saying that this specific person was not allowed to break that specific law, it would be impossible to convict anyone.
Thank you for simply explaining this horrific rule... who will keep us safe!?!
Time to revise the Constitution to make it less vulnerable for these kind of attacks
That's stating the obvious, but the question is, how do you get it done? You think 75% of the states would ratify? Our Hitler has a better chance at becoming a stable genius and giving up McDonald's.
Alito, Thomas,and Roberts HAVE GOT TO GO
The idea that experts aren't needed because they will make occasional mistakes is insane.
Boy she packs a lot of information into her turn when she speaks. All stuff. No fluff! Such great commentary.
Ali, keep going man. You have serious talent. Well done.