when she said that she had a problem with germany doing stuff outside its borders then reffered to it as "globalism". What she described wasn't globalism, it was the dictionary definition of imperialism
You're wrong, it still is globalism. According to Wiki, "'globalism' is to globalization what "nationalism" is to nationality." Simply, Hitler wanted to apply his ethical moral view with Germany to the entire world and took action to do so, and that fits under globalism. They were also imperialists.
Its kinda hard to make a meaningful distinction between imperialism and globalism tho. Economical liberalism came directly from imperialism to legitmize britisch exploitation. So Globalisation is morally laundered imperialism, imo.
@James Grün Sorry but what you are stating seems completely made up. Just to point out some details, there is no Gütenburg bible. Firstly I assume you mean the Gutenberg bible (invention of the printing press). Secondly neither the Gutenberg nor the Translation of the Bible by Luther were dedicated to Black people. That is a completely different topic. The Nazi party were not pro Black Supremacy, and I do not know of any evidence that supports them distinguishing between "pale" and "black" Jews as you phrased it. You are just making up facts! Why are you doing that? Stop Splitting society on disinformation!
Sounds like the same problem lefty "Antifascists" have to define who is a nazi / fascist, who deserves to be punched, fired from the job and sent to gulag. Oh, wait! Actually they don't have a defining problem: A nazi and/or fascist is EVERYONE, the left doesn't agree with.
Godwin’s law states that in a debate on the internet, one or both parties will devolve into ad hominem attacks unfairly comparing the opposing side to Adolf Hitler
@@MisterHeromanno 😂 ur jump to calling them a fascist for making fun of a “education platform” that has been proven to spout so much misinformation on American history and civil rights not just here but abroad and is made to make the elites sound good. But hey cause they don’t trust prager university a place proven to be pushing false info with fake facts and has a actual political agenda the facist no id say your the fascist if you call anyone a fascist for just not liking what you like which again is proven misinformation by corrupt politicians and rich pricks.
Ibram X. Kendi in How To Be an Antiracist is most emphatic about how Black people can be just as racist against Black people as any White person. Candace Owens is exhibit A.
@@michaelpugh2617 A nationalist in Hitler's nazi socialist Germany was made up of ONE race. A nationalist here in the USA is made up of ALL races. E plu ri bus u num. Huge difference. Learn it.
Not even. Mr. lieu knew the full clip because he stopped it from playing any further real quick. I don’t even like Candace but you gotta call a BS out when you see it
Words matter Candace…She said “If Hitler wanted to be a Nationalist then fine.” The statement suggests as long as he did what he did within the borders of Germany then, fine. It does not require an additional listening of 2 hours to get the full scope of your energy Ms. Owens…
Are you okay? If Hitler was just a nationalist it would be fine but he wasent just that. He was racist and killed his own people, incluiding German Jews who were apart of his nation. That’s not a nationalist. She was just saying that you can’t judge and hate nationalism because of Hitler, because he wasent a true nationalist.
@@neverknownsofmetronome9184except a nationalist does not mean just the confines of your own country. It means someone loyal to one's own land of birth or allegiance. She never said if Hitler only did stuff in his own country it would be fine she said "If Hitler wanted to make Germany great and wanted to better the people that would be fine." That does not mean how Hitler saw stuff as getting better but just making Germany better objectively. Thanks for showing your bias.
In fact, the people seem to believe that killing your own people is somehow better than killing others. Stalin and Mao don't get nearly as much hate as Hitler, even though Stalin was using brutal fear tactics against the Soviet people and Mao figuratively drowned China in blood because of his incompetence, making him the tyrant with the biggest body count in history.
@@beensteppin5762 If you watch the video, they word choice seemed to be emphasizing the killing of your own people. Don't take my comment personally. Chill out.
I looked up the full clip of the time in between the clip playing and her response just to be sure, and not once does Lieu ever say the word ‘Black.’ Candace Owens, ironically enough, plays the race card
I don't like or agree with Candace Owens at all in general however, her playing of the race card in this public forum is not only in her best interests but it is perfectly reasonable. Her personal brand as a black republican or even as a black conservative of any kind is something that automatically draws public attention from the black community. The guy was simply dangling her past comments in front of her with the specific intention to spin the narrative of her words into a defence of Hitler (which by the way, they are very clearly not). It is very important for her career to call it out for what it is, which is an attempt to attack her credibility. Without doing this, she is at risk of being further dismissed by the black community (and the centrist and leftist population in general) as a racist/anti-semite etc. who isn't worthy of being listened to.
“The clip is out of context!” In what context is saying “hitler wasn’t that bad!” any better? also the “Uhmm I work for praguer University” Is not something you should say proudly.
Except that's not what she said. The comment played was criticizing the association of Hitler's actions with the ideology of Nationalism, and the claim is that those actions were different from what a Nationalist would do. The comment was not evaluating the actions themselves, contrary to what the lawmaker may have been thinking.
She wasn’t saying hitler wasn’t bad, quite the opposite. She was saying hitler has tainted the word nationalism in our vocabulary, literally because of his evil. She then used this to make the claim that he wasn’t even a nationalist at all, but a racial supremacist. (pretty sound argument to me tbh as hitler did not care for all people groups within his nation.)
Wasnt even awkward. It was a "I really dont give a shit" shrug. They called her in there to attack her, and if that other senator didnt yield his time so she could respond, they would have cut her out entirely. They had no plans to let her respond. And the look on Lieus face says it all...smug, arrogant, asshat.
@@jeremiahbarlow461 It doesn't matter. Nadler and the left are enemies of liberty. The American people are finally becoming aware of this. The left wing is government control. If you don't understand that, your low IQ is showing.
Brad rawsner Socialism is the only hope for working class liberation. It's funny how precisely ass-backwards you are about what Americans are coming around to understanding after years of right-wing media spin doctoring. Look at figures about the popularity of single-payer healthcare, for instance. People like Owens are OBVIOUS frauds. It's so clear she's just out to make money. The reason she's ok with selling out black people is bc she's rich and making bank off this token role she was born to play. Not that complicated what's going on here.
@@nappybiscuit Doubt anyone would trust Wikipedia but a quick google has a definition there: "Patriotism is of its nature defensive, both militarily and culturally. Nationalism, on the other hand, is inseparable from the desire for power." Some other dictionary definitions support my abridged claim. In short, a patriot loves their country and is proud of what it does. A nationalist is someone who loves their country no matter what it does, usually in the context that they think other nations/races are less than them. Nationalists in the CCP deny warcrimes, racist nationalists think only a certain race qualifies you as part of a nation/race So nationalism is icky "sheeple" stuff
@@AlkoWilco there are 2 types Nationalism is an idea and movement that promotes the interests of a particular nation (as in a group of people), especially with the aim of gaining and maintaining the nation's sovereignty (self-governance) over its homeland. The term “nationalism” is generally used to describe two phenomena: the attitude that the members of a nation have when they care about their national identity, and the actions that the members of a nation take when seeking to achieve (or sustain) self-determination.
“The difference between patriotism and nationalism is that the patriot is proud of his country for what it does, and the nationalist is proud of his country no matter what it does; the first attitude creates a feeling of responsibility, but the second a feeling of blind arrogance that leads to war.” ― Sydney J. Harris
It was the patriottic frenzy after 9/11 that led to wars. It's the patriottic habits of signing anthems and have fighter jets fly over at sports events that is continuous war propaganda. If we look at the meaning of both words it makes more sense to claim it's the other way around. Patriottism comes from patria which means fatherland. So that assumes a blood line that connects a person to the country. Nationalism comes from nation which refers to place of birth, so that doesn't have a genetic component per se. National is opposed to international or supranational, so it's really quite a neutral political term to describe a policy or phenomenon, while patriottism is more about a feeling, a feeling that can be dangerous. This Harris guy makes a useful distinction in attitudes towards one's own country, the names he put on it seem random at best. You can't blame people for using the word nationalism because you picked the word patriottism instead ignoring both's words etymology.
@@DenUitvreter He is using them in the terms that people apply to them NOW, not how they were applied when the words were made up. Unfortunately, they may have gotten twisted by those who use nationalism as an excuse to destroy those not like themselves. Not his fault.
@@changingmyself True, but the issue that I have with it is that we need a word opposed to internationalism, supranationalism or globalism to debate that matter. I don't think we should discredit people who use the word nationalism beforehand, because the word patriottism lacks that quality of describing a policy or attitude concerning the relation of a country/nation state to the rest of world. The nazi's didn't call themselves nationalist to be accurate in English (often words don't mean exactly the same in a foreign version anyway), because they spoke German and most likely wanted a name that appealed to the Germans of that time. Socialist wasn't correct either and national might have referred to the quite recently unified Germany of that time instead of to the different German states that are and were part of the German federation. Actually they didn't call themselves nationalists at all, but national-sozialisten. So to associate the word nationalism with Hitler is quite a stretch to begin with. Words matter, and they can also be abused to disqualify people from a debate and not have the debate at all, allthough it should be held and there are legitimate other views than globalism and internationalism. So the opposite view needs a word without beeing associated with the blood from the 'blood and soil' ideology.
Black or white, gay or straight, anyone who repeatedly brings up Adolf Hitler in a way that isn’t outright negative is putting out major red flags. There’s an appeal there for her.
It’s not just her , most of the gop is outwardly embracing fascism , a majority of current conservative rhetoric is made up of literal nazi propaganda like the great replacement , cultural Marxism , qanon etc and they are only getting more comfortable
that means nothing, people love to use this tactic nowadays "You must hate on Stalin, Mao, Ho Chi Minh, the Kims, Gaddafi, Sadam Hussein, Ceausescu, Tito, Hoxha etc. or else you (🫵) are a horrible person!" we should be allowed to discuss historic political figures without restriction, miss me with that Harry Potter "he who shall not be named" boogeyman tactics
@@PantaloonTVmost of the people you mentions were fine like what did ho chi mi ever do and Tito, its you wanted to name every communist without ever looking into them? Dont lump them with the worst monsters in history like Hitler.
🤔Definitely more scary than funny. Imagine if she was on trial with her freedom being at risk. An impulsive judge with selective hearing would be a nightmare.
I don’t understand can you explain it to me? I think I know what you are saying but I’m new to politics so I’m just trying to learn what’s going on. Is it because she generalized him as thinking all black people are stupid but she’s calling him stupid? Idk genuinely trying to learn
Megan Basically Candice was pointing out how he purposefully only showed part of the clip and she interpreted it as him not thinking black people were smart enough to watch the whole clip and get context. The chairman was completely wrong because she never called the guy stupid, she said the guy thought of her (black people) as stupid. It’s scary that the head of the meeting was taking her out of context like how the man who played the video also took her out of context.
Megan If you’re getting into politics I highly recommend taking things at face value since all media will be biased in one way or the other. Also watch how both sides cover different topics. I would avoid Fox and CNN for the most part since they have extreme bias and it’s a lot of propaganda especially during the election. On TH-cam for conservative videos I recommend Ben Shapiro, Jordan Peterson, PragerU, Steven Crowder, conservative twins, and Ted Cruz. On the other side TYT, BBC, Philip DeFranco, and Joe Rogan.
Yeah lol especially how she tries to defend trump,man these people are unbelievable stupid and the way one second they’ll be spewing hate and then the next they’re trying to pull God out of their ass. If I didn’t live here this would be the funniest shit on television
You don't take her seriously cause you're purposely being stupid. Oh I hope you're not one of those fo0ls who think men can be women or that you can actually change your pronouns
@@archiejames4739 The full clip is just as disgusting. She stated Hitler would have been an excellent nationalist leader if he did not extend his policies outside of his borders because he wouldn’t have faced resistance. It was a horrible statement both in its long and short formats.
@@StrykeSZN she said, "I do not believe we should be categorizing Hitler as a nationalist" literally the same meaning, just a different way of wording.
@Thanos You say that like he did something, she responded and made him look stupid. Judging by his facial expressions and body language he was intimidated
It has very much to do with race, they painted Her as a nazi supporter, that has A LOT to do with race, and she stated that as saying that the idiot expects minorities to not get informed of the full video. So yes, it has a lot do with race and yet again she did not pull the race card.
@@alphaone321 they painted her as someone who supports nationalist as long as they keep their business inside their own country. She didn’t mention that hitler killed the Jews, she was more worried that they invaded Poland. Had nothing to with her race. So she pulled the race card.
@@joycet.2741 he also had plans to eradicate everyone except for Germany, Italy and spain, of course with the exception of gays and disabled people. And of course people that were part of his master race only (white, light eyes,blonde if possible)
@@efrikamaya One of the most integral parts of Hitler's 'making Germany great' included the persecution, and (originally), the forced eviction of Jewish communities. Whether or not that's global, it's not okay. She should've used a better example if she meant something else.
@@BobTheOneGuy agreed. I'm not conservative per say, but definitely right leaning and to me this just feels like she was trying to get a point across and did it completely the wrong way. Then instead of admitting to the mistake she made, she doubled down in her statement and made herself look like an idiot. This was completely unprofessional and was frankly terrible on her part
"a nationalist doesn't kill their own people" A nation is not a state/country. Catalans and the basque are nations within the state/country that is Spain. A nation is a group of people united by identity and a common history, culture, origin over a given territory. Candace's statement is almost correct in that a nationalist wouldn't kill his own people. The question is what that nationalist defines as "his" people. A white nationalist wouldn't kill white people for being white but he'd kill non whites for the same. A German nationalist would kill Italians for the not being Germans. An Aryan nationalist will kill people for not being part of the Aryan race. This isn't that hard a concept to grasp but as Candace often demonstrates thinking isn't her strong suit. Just seen her defend Nick Fuentes
It’s okay to be a nationalist. Hitler also loved puppys so does that mean because hitler loved puppys it’s not okay to also love puppys? What is not okay is to commit mass murder and kill millions and try to force your beliefs on the entire world
@@anarchistpoops161 The soviet socialists and nazi socialists were indeed top down government control. Stop the bullshit. Today, over 100 million libertarians and Republicans stand united against your left wing government control party. More and more people are becoming increasingly aware of the tyrannical left wing government control socialists. Stay tuned....
@@trevorm7013 Hitler's nazi socialist Germany and the soviet socialists were top down government control. Today's Democrat socialist party is also top down government control. More and more people are becoming increasingly aware of this reality. Over 100 million libertarians and Republicans stand united against your left wing government control party. It's the democrats who are incompatible with our principles of liberty and the bill of rights. And more people are starting to understand that.
@@bradhuskers alright since I see you're calling the nazis socialists I'm not even gonna pretend you're in good faith. Just know that socialism is by definiton horizontal, so the ussr wasn't socialist.
@@fisherman12k24 because those two things aren't mutually exclusive? saying that you have black/jewish/hispanic... friends doesn't automatically make you not racist
The way the Lawmaker guy holds the phone is like a younger brother who just told on their older sibling and now has their mom on speaker yelling at the older one. 💀
Sumbitches they are Nadler, Schumer, Pelosi, and where did little Adam Schiff go hide at? Haven't seen him in a while. These Democrats talk like we are crazy but its really the other way around. Hell if we are going communist I would rather run with the people that have morals instead of the ones holding a rainbow bright flag lol. U think about it
@Jennifer I find it interesting that a couple months after being evicted from her apartment because she owed $21,000 in rent, she "was "redpilled" and was hired as the director of communications at Turning Point USA-a very lucrative position. Or maybe it's just a coincidence. Just something interesting.
That's fucking Imperialism Nationalism is inherently isolationist it has nothing to do with race ffs in Spain people are proudly falangist yet that's not called Nazism because it's Civic Nationalist Syndicalism
Your just a first worldist Sjw who doesn't even realize that the first world is inhabited by spoiled children Soon the third world shall rise up against the first world imperialists and smite them all into hell then the world shall all understand the Red flame
@@thomasandel3934 ma dude, i am marxist. true and genuine not a diictator socialist. but yes it imperialism its the same as global nationalism. in the moment you cross fooreign lines it national appropriation.
Candace owens putting pressure on them committee members she letting them know lets stop the old narrative that black people are the un educated people of the world. Never been the case Blacks are smart and gifted people. It is those who choose to believe the invisible barriers in life they fall short..
She rips into them 30 seconds later and they go quiet if watched the rest of video, let alone the hearing. They did that on purpose to enable their progressive agenda with a clip out of context.
Is any single person in this committee even listening to one another? Are they even hearing what they sound like themselves? Even the judge isn't paying attention.
Just a set distraction talking point. No one accused her of being antisimetic. They accused her of thinking what hitler did to Jews, black ppl, gays, gypsy’s etc was ok as long as he only did it to people he (and she by inference) felt were not Germans, not REAL people, within his own national borders. Because the anti-defamation league was founded and is still seen as primarily focused on anti-semitism it opens the door for shallow arguments by the white supremacy movement to control the narrative by focusing on redirecting it toward and defending themselves against straw man arguments of antisemitism no matter what the actual accusation.
She worked for PragerU which is basically a "university" (if you can even call it that) that flaunts far-right conservative ideals and notorious even among historians and academics everywhere of basically trying to alter history to fit their narrative.
You usually get to be committee chair (not “main judge”) through seniority. If it’s a good committee people don’t want to leave it, so you need to be on it for a long time before attrition hands you a gavel. That of course means getting older.
"Let me play a clip of Ms Owens' worrying comments about nationalism and Adolf Hitler" Candace Owens: "Wow I can't believe you would say every black person is stupid" Whole crowd: "bruh wtf are you talking about"
except she said nothing that supported Hitler in any way, shape or form. But I guess you'd have to have a mind of your own to listen to the WHOLE thing.
@@hola1195 maybe that's true but I have actually no clue what the fuck this is about so I won't take a site, but her saying that the other guy would think that every black person is stupid, just because he played that audio clip, is plain stupid It's like saying: "oh? your not voted for biden? That's racist you fucking nazi!, what did black people do to you?"
@redfoxboss he killed his own nazi brothers and sisters though... on the slightest bit of dought if they were going to betray him he had them killed...
@@dragonfire3077 He viewed it as a killong for the betterment of his nation which is a case most nationalists would make because nationalism means protecting your borders with the most efficient means or any means and the death of one of your followers for the "safety" of your nation fits that bill
She's in a hard place. America will not acknowledge ,nationally and openly at the level of federal government, the previous and current issues that scar black Americans of every kind socially. "Black" is not dignified and she's stepping in a good direction but in one that does not yet exist popularly. She is making moves like race does not matter because she does not want her race to be a hindrance to her stances or ideals. Thats a hefty uphill battle. Admirable despite being problematic to some. The American Government will hopefully take initiatives at a social level to encourage the healing of its black communities on a social level from simple things like the shame that comes with "slave" associated ancestry as well as consistently negative stereotypes , decades perpetuated. Until the government outright speaks against and takes action toward correcting simple and detrimental social injustices without favoritism , it will be hard for anyone to see the government and the country considering black americans to be american people. I like her conviction. I am not a republican, Nor am I a democrat or anything in between. I've gotta do my research to officially associate BUT I support American Individuality. It is what makes us Americans. Individuality is a uniting force, as funny as that sounds.
Exactly! A nationalist wouldn’t but he’d still refer to large groups of people as invaders or disparagingly. Kinda how Trump refers to Mexicans and Muslims. He’s fine with “his own people”. He just doesn’t consider all Americans to be his people.
You're confusing totalitarianism with nationalism. Believing in a common identity as under a national one is nationalism. Killing people for wrong think is not. Having to hold obedience to a single figurehead as being part of your own identity is not. You just used a strawman argument, congrats.
Northkorea has nothing to do with nationalism. It's Juche Ideology. trust me i'm korean en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juche Basically it's god worshiping. not like any old leaders in history book it's much more horrifying
@@a1175779 learn straw man theory and it’s applications as that wouldn’t apply here. The conversation is about nationalism and he sticks to the topic As far as your argument, I’ll break this down using American nationalists. American nationalists don’t view liberals as American. It’s why when Fox News covers a poll, it’s “Americans prefer this, *DEMOCRATS* prefer that” Just like American nationalists feel the leftists are unAmerican, Hitler felt that Jews were not real Germans. Under those circumstances, yes nationalists would kill their own people Hope that helps!
@@chicodalianis8004 presenting an extreme example (NK) that is outside the framework of the argument in question (that Nationalism would result in killing their own people) and attacking that example as though it’s presenting an argument but is not (because NK is not an applicable example of nationalism, but totalitarianism which is the cause of the killing of their own people). Thank you for having to get me to spell it out for you. Thanks for playing. Learn your logical fallacies.
@Andrea MENDENHALL the scots are the toughest people ever and they throw logs in the highlander games but do you know what they wear at the highlander games? How about the roman legions are they pussies for eating vegetables and wearing skirts? All the Europeans kings from the 16th to 18th century? I mean just look at king Louis IX he is so lady like! Sultanates wore certain types of gowns and so did the ancient greeks though the latter is debatable but would you consider alexander the great a weakling because he wore a skirt?
@@hunterallen Yes she got dunked on. That did happen. You're comment fails to be reductive if you're acknowledging he's right. "A nationalist would not kill their own people." You know except all the nationalist that do.
Hmm, I didn't see that. It looked like she was listening to her words and preparing to defend/stand by her comments. which she did. she never denied it, she clarified it.
She's obviously triggered cause she realized it is her saying that.. knew what they did in that moment and we already know it's what they like to do its not there first time cutting things out to make someone sound evil you wanna here evidence here the whole thing not something that's been tampered with and cut .. Candace Owens is a defending patriotic woman
Not me, I know how to analyze answers like a thinking being. STEP ONE, FIND OUT WHAT THE QUESTION WAS. You try to force admission of SIMPLISTIC, MORONIC VIEWS from people, clearly without having the intelligence to understand HUMAN COMPLEXITY. As a DEMOCRAT FOR 53 YEARS, THIS DISGUSTS ME. SICKENS ME. YOU'RE UNAMERICAN, FUEDAL, TRIBAL AND SAVAGE! *YOU MIGHT AS WELL NOT EVEN HAVE LANGUAGE IF YOU GOING TO IGNORE MEANING, SUBSTANCE AND NUANCE!* _SHAME ON YOU._
It's just sad. She's defensive because she doesn't have a legitimate counter. She sounds like a child in a room of people trying to get a straight answer out of her.
Every comment I see on a CNN video is "I'm surprised they reported the full thing, this time." Like, at a certain point, we have to accept that it's Fox News that is fake.
@Robert Gray not really. CNN is pretty centrist and misrepresented Sanders' polling data. Left wing politics doesn't exist in the US. Fox News "fighting dirty" is spreading misinformation about Covid and climate change.
@Stannis Baratheon 100% correct. Yet just take a look at all the low IQ's in these threads. Proof that the left has corrupted the press, media and academia, which is why we see millions of brainwashed simple minds who cannot think critically.
I have a major disagreement with Owen’s statement “a nationalist wouldn’t kill their own people” history shows us this isn’t true, it more or less depends on who governing nationalists consider “their own people”
And most American nationalists definitely do not consider her or anyone remotely near her skin’s hue to be “their own people”.
4 ปีที่แล้ว +2
It's probably NOT a good idea to use a divisive, lightening rod of a person as an example in any way. It takes too long to rehabilitate the mentioned person in people's minds to get your point across.
@Volintine Ander smh I’m black we come in many shades don’t try to play me. Malcolm X, Elijah Mohammed, Rosa Parks, President Barack Obama, and many more all light skin people. . Do that take away what they did for BLACK people, and they definitely were not treated any different... smh
Tricia, he thought she was one of the many blk Americans who refuse to research and look things up. He was hoping that was the case so he could win his argument. As you could see by the look on his face at the end, she floored him. He wasn't expecting her nonstereotypical response. Maybe you should try to not be so predictable too. We know candace riles up your feathers because she refuses to excuse the immense dysfunction in the blk community. Deal with it.
@Phantaloo Rimush Actually? If you don't understand that the press, media and academia are corrupted by left wing bullshit propaganda, then it's YOU who doesn't understand a GOT DAMN thing.
The way these ppl are trying to legitimize nationalism is absolutely insane to me, and it's extremely dangerous. Nationalism aims to build and maintain a single national identity. What that means is one race, one religion, one culture, one ethnicity, one language. Thats literally what nationalism is. How do you achieve that in a country that was built and is still being maintained by immigrants??? Not one country on the planet can achieve that peacefully, the US the least. And that's exactly where "nationalists don't kill THEIR OWN PEOPLE" should raise alarms.
when she tried to claim that lieu some how thought black people were stupid for using HER own words against her; isn’t that race baiting and something she has outwardly spoke against LOL ...i’m a black man btw
She was saying that lieu thought black people are stupid because he wouldn't think they'd take the time to look up the full context of the clip he played to paint her as a nazi.
@@thembzz Because the left is trying to distance her from black people trying to make it seem as if her political views don't make her black, which is stupid.
She clearly said “Mr Lieu believes black people are stupid.” Don’t know how so many people in the comments are so willfully ignorant. Like just go back to 1:30 in the clip!
CM 2 “No true nationalist” isn’t a proper excuse. Nationalism is inherently biased against people who are different. It isn’t always racial bias (though it usually is) but it is inherently discriminatory. It operates on a basis that people aren’t equal.
He was just reinforcing his request to not refer to any party as stupid, she was just so mad she couldn’t look past that. Almost like saying that nothing can justify her choice of words because of her assumptions of what the other party thinks of blacks.
@@BeatBoyStill He obviously thought she called Lieu stupid, which is completely false. She was understandably mad because he wasn’t listening properly. It does not matter if she couldn’t look past, the judge thought something else.
Candace Owens: Makes a brand based on "I don't play the black card" Also Candace Owens: Plays the black card in the most direct and egregious way possible
@@brianvalencia9001 How do you interpret this as a defense of Hitler? Holy fuck, do you have like a ten second attention span? She literally lambasts him immediately after. The entire substance of the discussion has to do with whether or not terminology like "Nationalist" should belong to evil bad guys like Hitler, or if that terminology can describe more than just genocidal freaks. She makes that point perfectly fine (and does so much better at length), but the clip provided sure as hell doesn't show that. They attempted to character assassinate her, and Owens was too smart for that. I bet Hitler had a favorite flavor of ice cream too, but you don't see people sniping each other over rocky road or neopolitan. The idea of Nationalism doesn't really belong to the 3rd Reich, and while I personally wouldn't die on that hill it's not like she's wrong to pursue it either. If anything, it's righteous to try and reclaim things like that away from horrible ideologies, because then they have less power over ideas. Why let Nazis win at anything anyway?
The thing is that she didnt pull the race card. She referred to black PEOPLE not her being a black person indivually. If it was the other way around then i would agree that would be a bad point to make.
Bernardo Patiño no she doesn’t hate herself, she’s probably embarrassed how the US Govt treats black people like victims who are gullible. Just like how I’m embarrassed the Govt is trying to divide the awesome races in our country, instead of unite u.
OBV Paradox She did pull it though. Well tried to. Accusing Mr. Lieu of thinking all black people are stupid because he played a clip for _all_ listening humans (so you know, not just black people) to get a sense of Candace’s stances, was an attempt by her to use the race card, and an illogical attempt at that. She tried a whole dishonest manipulative, “HEY, BLACK PEOPLE! THIS MAN THINKS _WE_ AS A WHOLE ARE STUPID! CAN YOU EVEN BELIEVE THE RACISM?! This, my fellow BLACKS and allied whites. is why you should side with me, the victim.” That was definitely her using the race card, genius.
Definition of globalism: Globalism is the idea that the world's events are interconnected, and that a country's actions should take into account their impact on the rest of the world. It also refers to the belief that economic and foreign policy should be planned on a global basis, rather than for the benefit of individual countries. Definition of nationalism: Identification with one's own nation and support for its interests, especially to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations. If you can't figure out which of these describes Hitler, I'm gonna need you to go back to school and retake all your history classes.
He called everybody who disagreed with him a dirty commie/socialist and had them killed. That of course is not gonna stop relubkcians from claiming he was a socialist lmfao
@@dannyc6987 I guess hitler himself missed the memo in the1930's and called his party the Nazis.... ie, the National SOCIALIST party! Try reading history before trying to rewrite it, my friend
I don't think Nadler was trying to trip her up, I think he genuinely wasn't listening. I'm not sure if it's because he's senile, an idiot, just had a normal lapse, or because he has some character flaw, but it wasn't part of any game.
No she just accused him of being racist against all black people 😒 🙄 😐 Played the race card right off the bat. Then gives a speech about how she doesn't use her race to play the victim.
It’s just common knowledge that democrats think black people are useless and dumb. That’s why they think voter ID laws are racist toward black people. Democrats actually think black people are too stupid and too poor to have things like an ID or internet. It’s insanely racist. It’s exactly why Malcolm X hate white Liberals.
I hate the Nazi regime as a minority. History clearly showed why Hilter like Moa was able to come to power. China CCP is a communist nationalist country. So, do you actively support China CCP?
Natasha Hart The problem with nationalism is it’s narcissistic, in that people forget that the world doesn’t revolve around just one nation or one specific group of people. Often times it gets mistaken for Patriotism by it’s supporters, when in reality it’s a veiled excuse for being bigoted against any views, races, ethnicities, & religions that are not considered a part of the ideology. To take pride in being a part of this Nation is one thing, but to think that it justifies certain actions that either suppress or become harmful to others is when the line gets crossed. I’ve literally seen a video on TH-cam of a Trump rally where a supporter approached him in a “KKK For Trump” T Shirt, and watched the crowd cheer this guy on & start chanting “USA” & throwing up Nazi salutes. Now to Trumps credit, he didn’t feed into this & got the guy thrown out, but once he did that, that same crowd that was just cheering this guy on & chanting “USA” flipped the switch real quick & were now acting like they weren’t just throwing up Nazi salutes like 30 seconds prior. Point is, if a whole room full of “Americans” were just associating the KKK & Nazi’s with “USA” & Nationalism, what’s that tell you?
Natasha Hart I think the bigger question is why would anyone subscribe to an ideology that practices “the exclusion & detriment of others?” That shouldn’t be the type of country we strive to be either. I think more often than not, people get too hung up on being Republicans & Democrats, Socialists or Nationalists, Liberals & Conservatives, and need to get back to just being “Americans” & human beings (I’m an Independent BTW, so to me, both sides of the political spectrum are flawed). Wrong is wrong, regardless of who it benefits. It’s time for us as a country to stop with all the “finger pointing” & start doing some serious “soul searching”... Bottom line is, there’s no such thing as an “Independent” Nation. We’re all Interdependent on one another, whether we like it or not. If people really want to be “Nationalists”, then we shouldn’t be relying on other countries for anything. We shouldn’t be using places like Mexico & China for cheap labor & goods, We should be manufacturing everything we sell in the US (the biggest reason for poverty in this country is the outsourcing of jobs). We shouldn’t be importing our oil from Saudi Arabia, or precious metals from Africa. We should be relying on the natural resources under our own soil. We shouldn’t be borrowing money from other Nations, or setting up Military bases in foreign countries. We don’t want to be “globalists”, but we still feel entitled & demand access to global resources. That’s not “Nationalism.”
Natasha Hart No, I know how foreign dependency works, but it doesn’t make us any less dependent on these weaker countries to provide us with cheap labor & resources. As Nationalists (in theory) shouldn’t we be more concerned w/ self preservation & self sufficiency? So how can we do that when our money & resources are tied in w/ the rest of the world’s wealth & natural resources? Our stocks, bonds & prices rise & fall right along w/ everybody else’s when things go right or wrong around the globe, so we’re just as dependent on them to provide labor & raw meterials as they are on us for business & money. Which again, is global interdependence, not National Independence. That would be like me acting like I’m doing you a favor by giving you gas money, to drive me back & forth to work everyday cause I don’t have a car of my own.
Natasha Hart Unfortunately we may already be too vulnerable. China is the biggest manufacturing country in the world. Not only do they own & operate all their own manufacturing, but most of our (Western Civilizations) factories as well. Plus with their recent interests in Africa, now they’re able to gain easy access to raw materials & land for farming. So they’re more engaged in Nationalism than we are, meaning they’re way more self reliant from us than we are of them. You gotta think China, Japan, & Korea make up at least 60-80% of all manufacturing of our technology & goods. & we’ve been dependent on them for this since at least the 70’s (when Nixon reopened relations). We’re in debt to them, we do little to no manufacturing over here of our own, & there’s not a whole lot that they buy from us, that they don’t already make themselves (the only thing we really make that other countries want is our guns & weapons). So how are we expected to roll that genie back in the bottle? We’d have to pay off our debts w/ them, plus bring back manufacturing to the states before we could ever be free from dependence... & not only China, but the Middle East for fossil fuels, India & Mexico for our manufactured goods also, & Africa for their natural resources. That’s what I mean by interdependence. As a consumer based economy, We’re almost completely incapable of supplying our own demand, if we had to rely solely on our own “National” Resources.
How does him showing a clip of something she said insinuate that he thinks black people are stupid? I mean these assumption make sense coming from someone that works at Prager U lmao
Many do not research the entirety of clips presented in the news and automatically form an opinion. This does not only pertain to black people, but to all. The panel was trying to change the narrative of her argument. Listen to the entire hearing to understand why she said this. It makes more sense.
@@rociolinares9367 She's a dumbass that's just chasing the bag there's nothing more to it, ever wonder who's behind Prager U or other conservative propaganda distributers.
@@georgecabrera9039 Prager is behind Prager U? He literally makes videos on his own site. Why doesn't George Soros show up since he owns most of the leftist media? Another main conservative media is Louder with Crowder and we obviously know who owns that one
Owens: "A nationalist would not kill their own people." Sure Miss Owens, just know that no one outside of your political community uses your definition of nationalism.
This. Nationalists don't kill their own. What they do do, is increasingly create minor delineations between the people they used to define as "their people" do that they can turn them into "the other", which is okay to genocide.
The google definition of nationalism states that they would have support for there nations interests. Shes just saying we shouldnt characterize all nationalists as hitler 🤷♀️
@@zentempo7902 Some nationalists aren't bad, but in general unchecked nationalism leads to people thinking that anything is justified for the good of their nation, including at the expense of others. That flavour of nationalism is the one Owens indulges in. She's also pushing the PragerU (not a real school) myth that Hitler was a socialist and tries to associate liberal socialism with Nazi ideology despite the fact that the Nazi party actively dismantled Worker's unions. She claims people trying to promote social justice are the real racists, and other such nonsense. Her ideology is aligned with that of PragerU, a radical organisation who is not to be trusted as it is run by many deeply selfish people. I thought they were a legitimate organisation when I first saw their videos, but I was lucky enough that eventually I questioned their thinking after their anti-immigrant sentiment became clear (my father was the son of German immigrants and I feel a degree of sympathy for anyone forced to leave their country because of war and violence.)
The problem is her saying this about Hitler and on another side having bullyied Black Lives Matter and been a black voice for Trump. That is the problem.
@@jeremysoon2b19 nope, because in a nation you dont have to love the country, or do you dont even need to care about it to be a citizen, nationalist always put away people who are not nationalist enough, and exclude Them, with names that erase their nationality, like the German communists
@@TheMaztercom I agree with the 1st part and disagree with the second part. Nationalist don’t exclude people of their nation because of different beliefs. They may disagree with those people, sure. But they still consider those they disagree with as part of the nation
@@jeremysoon2b19 well, nowdays we dont have a lot of nationalist, only one I think is trump, and he wanted all foreigns to "assimilate" to american culture, this is basically, be like the nation, or dont be, also, a nation has his owns beliefs, so I dont know a nationalist can still accept a guy who thinks is good to worship a flying spaguetti, when the nation beliefs says a flying spaguetti is a pagan god, I doubt a nationalist would put some guys with other beliefs first, in any case, nationalists will force an assimilation campaign, and thats is almost the same as excluding, cause if you are not part of the nation you are a traitor, I mean, nationalist first objective is to make a nation the most homogenous possible, because different beliefs and different opinions produce clash between citizens, so I dont see how, not excluding different people of the nation is not a nationalist trait, if we analyze nationalist trough history (hilter, churchill, alexander the Great, julius cesar, some more) they excluded or forced people to assimilate, cause nationalist objective is to make a nation strong, and you make a nation strong with clear beliefs and objectives, only made possible is most of the country believe in them
@@TheMaztercom I disagree with your premise that a Nationalist won’t people like pastafarians as people of this nation. I’m an atheist and nationalist. I live in one of, if not the most religiously diverse countries in the world. I consider Americans who believe any number of things that I disagree with, as Americans .
The chairman may have misheard what she said but Candice also completely fabricated anyone suggesting that black people were stupid, intentionally deflecting to try to keep people on her side
I don’t agree with this lady’s politics, but it was incredibly frustrating when the judge wasn’t even listening and said that she called the guy stupid 🤦🏼♂️
@@brunobucciarati7278 These people are brainwashed, they very literally can't hear things that counter what they have been told to believe. That's the only way you can watch this and not see it for exactly what it is.
@@mrducky6322 She didn’t imply it, you moron. She said that leftists think that Black people are stupid and won’t go and search out the entire question and answer. She neither said, nor implied that Lieu is stupid. Even though he obviously is. I know many of you leftists need help with words. So there you go. All better now.
@@catsdogsbaby8318 She said the lawmaker thinks she is stupid, and the chairman stopped her from speaking because he thought she was calling the lawmaker stupid, when that is not what she said.
I think its bad on both sides. What hilter was doing even in the confines of his own country is not ok. No one should be persecuted within the borders of any nation for their religious beliefs, skin color, sexuality etcetera. You can not take one step of his plots and call it great if that was so I would take my time in highschool and say I'm the smartest kid in the world because I had higher grades.
Fausto Chavez It doesn’t matter, you cannot use Hitler for any defense, he was a mass murderer. Period. His only problem was he murdered millions of people.
The amount of time that she's disrespected is insane, like i get that you don't agree with her but calling her dispecable and interuppting her every time, like you can't call youself a feminist and disrespecting cristian women and conservetive women.
Uh,,,speaking specifically of blacks in an appropriate setting on an appropriate topic is NOT playing the race card. Are you awake? Playing the race card is USING you race to get around looking at a situation justly. Not taking responsibility.
In this case, CO called out the left's little drama - a hearing on the rise of hate crimes by white nationalists . Just another of their tactics they use to scare and disgust you.(us) So you will vote for them. We - CO, myself and others - strongly reject to being manipulated like that. Just show us how to reach the American dream and we'll get going. That's what blacks need to succeed.
This isn't playing the race card. This was mentioning it at a proper and necessary moment, as it was the topic at hand, which you would understand more had you watched at least 10-15 minutes of this hearing, instead of 3.
Steph J Lieu: shows clip of CO making questionable comments about hitler CO:“I think it’s pretty apparent that mr lieu thinks that black people are stupid...” Totally not using her race to deflect an argument. At all.
@@elliot04877 um no, people are now feeling comfortable about breaking gender norms. There are plenty of masculine men and feminine women who are not toxic. Just because someone wants to break a gender norm doest mean that "society is collapsing" it actually means that the society is becoming more accepting of those that were once seen as "other"
@@toomuchglitters7254 don't fool yourself, the west is in a sharp decline because of this moral decay. Traditional countries with strong masculine and feminine divide like china and india are taking over. This idea of breaking norms and tolerance is dividing and killing the west from the inside
when she said that she had a problem with germany doing stuff outside its borders then reffered to it as "globalism". What she described wasn't globalism, it was the dictionary definition of imperialism
You're wrong, it still is globalism. According to Wiki, "'globalism' is to globalization what "nationalism" is to nationality." Simply, Hitler wanted to apply his ethical moral view with Germany to the entire world and took action to do so, and that fits under globalism. They were also imperialists.
I thought the same thing. Hitler was just invading his neighbors for German glory. Pretty simple concept.
Finally, someone addressed the actual flaw in her speech
Edit: changed 'of' to 'in'
Its kinda hard to make a meaningful distinction between imperialism and globalism tho.
Economical liberalism came directly from imperialism to legitmize britisch exploitation. So Globalisation is morally laundered imperialism, imo.
i wuv your icon 🥰🥰🥰
"Nationalists do not kill their own people"
The problem arises when you ask the nationalist to define "his own people"
I was just about to bring that up lol you beat me to it. When she made that comment my brain immediately jumped to the “no true Scotsman” fallacy
Thankyou, I was going to say something similar but you worded better than I would have.
@James Grün which black Jews did he rescue?
@James Grün Sorry but what you are stating seems completely made up. Just to point out some details, there is no Gütenburg bible. Firstly I assume you mean the Gutenberg bible (invention of the printing press). Secondly neither the Gutenberg nor the Translation of the Bible by Luther were dedicated to Black people. That is a completely different topic. The Nazi party were not pro Black Supremacy, and I do not know of any evidence that supports them distinguishing between "pale" and "black" Jews as you phrased it. You are just making up facts! Why are you doing that? Stop Splitting society on disinformation!
Sounds like the same problem lefty "Antifascists" have to define who is a nazi / fascist, who deserves to be punched, fired from the job and sent to gulag.
Oh, wait! Actually they don't have a defining problem: A nazi and/or fascist is EVERYONE, the left doesn't agree with.
Isn't there a saying when a debate is held long enough, hitler will be mentioned.
Godwin’s law states that in a debate on the internet, one or both parties will devolve into ad hominem attacks unfairly comparing the opposing side to Adolf Hitler
Rent free. Longest streak.
@@squidmaster1297 exactly it’s like hitler wante- oh wait
@@presenceofthemastermtg5962 Which wasn’t the case here
@@verfuncht I think he knows that he was just saying that’s what the other guy was referring to
"By the way I would like to mention that I work for Prager University..." oh my gosh it just writes itself
So you're being a fascist now? Just gonna judge like that?
Hey leave Candace alone... She has black friends😂
@@MisterHeromanno 😂 ur jump to calling them a fascist for making fun of a “education platform” that has been proven to spout so much misinformation on American history and civil rights not just here but abroad and is made to make the elites sound good. But hey cause they don’t trust prager university a place proven to be pushing false info with fake facts and has a actual political agenda the facist no id say your the fascist if you call anyone a fascist for just not liking what you like which again is proven misinformation by corrupt politicians and rich pricks.
Right? As if that somehow legitimizes or strengthens her position.
Ohoh! Prager University .... hmmm... quite distinguished are we?
I never thought I hear a black person use the “I’m not racist because I have black friends” defense in my entire life.
Ibram X. Kendi in How To Be an Antiracist is most emphatic about how Black people can be just as racist against Black people as any White person. Candace Owens is exhibit A.
Did you not hear the rest of the clip...
Also, do you really think a hitler supporter would have jewish friends?
@@jhonklan3794 do u really think a racist person would have black friends? You hear how stupid you sound right?
@@jhonklan3794 you realize hitler literally had a Jewish barber his entire life. Even hitler had the excuse of having a Jewish friend.
@@michaelpugh2617
A nationalist in Hitler's nazi socialist Germany was made up of ONE race.
A nationalist here in the USA is made up of ALL races.
E plu ri bus u num.
Huge difference.
Learn it.
He really just pulled a “this you?” on her in a hearing
Fr he pulled out the phone and said, “this you?”
Lmao 😂
Lol
Not even.
Mr. lieu knew the full clip because he stopped it from playing any further real quick. I don’t even like Candace but you gotta call a BS out when you see it
Watch the rest of the video. Attention span of a child.
I thought he was going to play video of Hitler's speech 😂
same 😂
That's would've been lit fam
Me too
It's good to hear from that idiotic maniac sometimes
Same
Kingsley Asante blah blah you’ve probably never listened to his speeches
Words matter Candace…She said “If Hitler wanted to be a Nationalist then fine.” The statement suggests as long as he did what he did within the borders of Germany then, fine. It does not require an additional listening of 2 hours to get the full scope of your energy Ms. Owens…
Are you okay? If Hitler was just a nationalist it would be fine but he wasent just that. He was racist and killed his own people, incluiding German Jews who were apart of his nation. That’s not a nationalist. She was just saying that you can’t judge and hate nationalism because of Hitler, because he wasent a true nationalist.
you comprehension is on par with all the gender bendening anti humanist emotional death cultists.
@@lance8980 Keep defending…We know another group of people in America who killed their own as well…if you want to unpack that…
@@neverknownsofmetronome9184except a nationalist does not mean just the confines of your own country. It means someone loyal to one's own land of birth or allegiance.
She never said if Hitler only did stuff in his own country it would be fine she said "If Hitler wanted to make Germany great and wanted to better the people that would be fine." That does not mean how Hitler saw stuff as getting better but just making Germany better objectively.
Thanks for showing your bias.
That wasn't the context of what she said, though
Can we just take a moment to address that it is wrong to kill people even if they are not "your own?"
We all know this. Don't be dumb
In fact, the people seem to believe that killing your own people is somehow better than killing others. Stalin and Mao don't get nearly as much hate as Hitler, even though Stalin was using brutal fear tactics against the Soviet people and Mao figuratively drowned China in blood because of his incompetence, making him the tyrant with the biggest body count in history.
Holy shit did you just solve racism
@@beensteppin5762 If you watch the video, they word choice seemed to be emphasizing the killing of your own people. Don't take my comment personally. Chill out.
@@boazchapman2353 It has nothing to do with race. You okay?
"You didn't listen to what I said"
Judge: 🤷
Someone once typed “ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ “ and it fits so perfectly
You thief!
Nadler is a low IQ tub o' lard.
Takin 1000 miles a hour bout nun😭
@Just J what has she said that's not true?
I looked up the full clip of the time in between the clip playing and her response just to be sure, and not once does Lieu ever say the word ‘Black.’ Candace Owens, ironically enough, plays the race card
Can you remind me about what the hearing was about. I think that’s fairly important for her using the “race card”
@@Yandy6 Her being black had nothing to do with the hearing though. The hearing's topic was about nationalism. Not racism
@@SpursAccess mhmm my bad I thought that the hearing was about racism my bad. Then yes it is funny that she plays the “race card”
@@Yandy6 Its alright. Yeah, Im not a big fan of people who use the race or gender card in an argument(that isnt relevant)
I don't like or agree with Candace Owens at all in general however, her playing of the race card in this public forum is not only in her best interests but it is perfectly reasonable.
Her personal brand as a black republican or even as a black conservative of any kind is something that automatically draws public attention from the black community. The guy was simply dangling her past comments in front of her with the specific intention to spin the narrative of her words into a defence of Hitler (which by the way, they are very clearly not). It is very important for her career to call it out for what it is, which is an attempt to attack her credibility. Without doing this, she is at risk of being further dismissed by the black community (and the centrist and leftist population in general) as a racist/anti-semite etc. who isn't worthy of being listened to.
“The clip is out of context!”
In what context is saying “hitler wasn’t that bad!” any better?
also the “Uhmm I work for praguer University” Is not something you should say proudly.
Except that's not what she said. The comment played was criticizing the association of Hitler's actions with the ideology of Nationalism, and the claim is that those actions were different from what a Nationalist would do. The comment was not evaluating the actions themselves, contrary to what the lawmaker may have been thinking.
She wasn’t saying hitler wasn’t bad, quite the opposite. She was saying hitler has tainted the word nationalism in our vocabulary, literally because of his evil. She then used this to make the claim that he wasn’t even a nationalist at all, but a racial supremacist. (pretty sound argument to me tbh as hitler did not care for all people groups within his nation.)
@@GolAcheron-fc4ug Okay then, what is a nationalist?
Bro did not understand a thing 😅
@@EsehCyril How not? She litteraly is trying to say "hitler isn't a nationalist!" despite him quite clearly being one.
Candace Owens *anger* “that’s NOT what i said. You DIDNT LISTEN to what I said”
*awkward shrug*
Lol
Wasnt even awkward. It was a "I really dont give a shit" shrug. They called her in there to attack her, and if that other senator didnt yield his time so she could respond, they would have cut her out entirely. They had no plans to let her respond. And the look on Lieus face says it all...smug, arrogant, asshat.
@@dublinfool25 they didn't call her in there. The Republicans asked her to come. Because she was a victim of a hate crime. Just the facts.
@@jeremiahbarlow461
It doesn't matter.
Nadler and the left are enemies of liberty.
The American people are finally becoming aware of this.
The left wing is government control.
If you don't understand that, your low IQ is showing.
Brad rawsner Socialism is the only hope for working class liberation. It's funny how precisely ass-backwards you are about what Americans are coming around to understanding after years of right-wing media spin doctoring. Look at figures about the popularity of single-payer healthcare, for instance. People like Owens are OBVIOUS frauds. It's so clear she's just out to make money. The reason she's ok with selling out black people is bc she's rich and making bank off this token role she was born to play. Not that complicated what's going on here.
“Nationalists wouldn’t kill their own people.” History says otherwise
I think she’s referring to a true definition of a nationalist,
@@mainlandmedia3295 Nationalism is patriotism with a superiority complex
@@AlkoWilco No not by its definition it is not. Where did you read that?
@@nappybiscuit Doubt anyone would trust Wikipedia but a quick google has a definition there:
"Patriotism is of its nature defensive, both militarily and culturally. Nationalism, on the other hand, is inseparable from the desire for power."
Some other dictionary definitions support my abridged claim.
In short, a patriot loves their country and is proud of what it does.
A nationalist is someone who loves their country no matter what it does, usually in the context that they think other nations/races are less than them.
Nationalists in the CCP deny warcrimes, racist nationalists think only a certain race qualifies you as part of a nation/race
So nationalism is icky "sheeple" stuff
@@AlkoWilco there are 2 types
Nationalism is an idea and movement that promotes the interests of a particular nation (as in a group of people), especially with the aim of gaining and maintaining the nation's sovereignty (self-governance) over its homeland.
The term “nationalism” is generally used to describe two phenomena:
the attitude that the members of a nation have when they care about their national identity, and
the actions that the members of a nation take when seeking to achieve (or sustain) self-determination.
“The difference between patriotism and nationalism is that the patriot is proud of his country for what it does, and the nationalist is proud of his country no matter what it does; the first attitude creates a feeling of responsibility, but the second a feeling of blind arrogance that leads to war.”
― Sydney J. Harris
True
It was the patriottic frenzy after 9/11 that led to wars. It's the patriottic habits of signing anthems and have fighter jets fly over at sports events that is continuous war propaganda.
If we look at the meaning of both words it makes more sense to claim it's the other way around. Patriottism comes from patria which means fatherland. So that assumes a blood line that connects a person to the country. Nationalism comes from nation which refers to place of birth, so that doesn't have a genetic component per se.
National is opposed to international or supranational, so it's really quite a neutral political term to describe a policy or phenomenon, while patriottism is more about a feeling, a feeling that can be dangerous. This Harris guy makes a useful distinction in attitudes towards one's own country, the names he put on it seem random at best. You can't blame people for using the word nationalism because you picked the word patriottism instead ignoring both's words etymology.
@@DenUitvreter He is using them in the terms that people apply to them NOW, not how they were applied when the words were made up. Unfortunately, they may have gotten twisted by those who use nationalism as an excuse to destroy those not like themselves. Not his fault.
@@DenUitvreter I have to agree with you on this 100%, unfortunately, many of those patriots, were also nationalists.
@@changingmyself True, but the issue that I have with it is that we need a word opposed to internationalism, supranationalism or globalism to debate that matter. I don't think we should discredit people who use the word nationalism beforehand, because the word patriottism lacks that quality of describing a policy or attitude concerning the relation of a country/nation state to the rest of world.
The nazi's didn't call themselves nationalist to be accurate in English (often words don't mean exactly the same in a foreign version anyway), because they spoke German and most likely wanted a name that appealed to the Germans of that time. Socialist wasn't correct either and national might have referred to the quite recently unified Germany of that time instead of to the different German states that are and were part of the German federation. Actually they didn't call themselves nationalists at all, but national-sozialisten. So to associate the word nationalism with Hitler is quite a stretch to begin with.
Words matter, and they can also be abused to disqualify people from a debate and not have the debate at all, allthough it should be held and there are legitimate other views than globalism and internationalism. So the opposite view needs a word without beeing associated with the blood from the 'blood and soil' ideology.
Black or white, gay or straight, anyone who repeatedly brings up Adolf Hitler in a way that isn’t outright negative is putting out major red flags. There’s an appeal there for her.
It’s not just her , most of the gop is outwardly embracing fascism , a majority of current conservative rhetoric is made up of literal nazi propaganda like the great replacement , cultural Marxism , qanon etc and they are only getting more comfortable
that means nothing, people love to use this tactic nowadays "You must hate on Stalin, Mao, Ho Chi Minh, the Kims, Gaddafi, Sadam Hussein, Ceausescu, Tito, Hoxha etc. or else you (🫵) are a horrible person!"
we should be allowed to discuss historic political figures without restriction, miss me with that Harry Potter "he who shall not be named" boogeyman tactics
@@PantaloonTVYour white hood is showing. Who knew this triggered you right in the ole swastika... Ouch dumkov
@@PantaloonTV Except when it's the president of the United States praising Hitler's use of the military on Germany's people.
@@PantaloonTVmost of the people you mentions were fine like what did ho chi mi ever do and Tito, its you wanted to name every communist without ever looking into them? Dont lump them with the worst monsters in history like Hitler.
- "He thinks that black people are stupid."
- "You offended him and called him stupid."
It's hilarious yet frightening at the same time.
LOL
🤔Definitely more scary than funny. Imagine if she was on trial with her freedom being at risk. An impulsive judge with selective hearing would be a nightmare.
I don’t understand can you explain it to me? I think I know what you are saying but I’m new to politics so I’m just trying to learn what’s going on. Is it because she generalized him as thinking all black people are stupid but she’s calling him stupid? Idk genuinely trying to learn
Megan Basically Candice was pointing out how he purposefully only showed part of the clip and she interpreted it as him not thinking black people were smart enough to watch the whole clip and get context. The chairman was completely wrong because she never called the guy stupid, she said the guy thought of her (black people) as stupid. It’s scary that the head of the meeting was taking her out of context like how the man who played the video also took her out of context.
Megan If you’re getting into politics I highly recommend taking things at face value since all media will be biased in one way or the other. Also watch how both sides cover different topics. I would avoid Fox and CNN for the most part since they have extreme bias and it’s a lot of propaganda especially during the election. On TH-cam for conservative videos I recommend Ben Shapiro, Jordan Peterson, PragerU, Steven Crowder, conservative twins, and Ted Cruz. On the other side TYT, BBC, Philip DeFranco, and Joe Rogan.
The photographer in the back turned around real quick like "this none of my business" 😭
Her face was priceless 😂🤣
She looked so disappointed 😂😂
😂
😂😂😂😂
0:51
“He obviously thinks black people are stupid”
Candace Owens, everyone.
Yet she quoted Hitler. Cant trust a word she says .
@@ncr4007 the question was asking about hitler as a nationalist dummy
@@ncr4007 where did she quote Hitler?
@@ncr4007 is it not allowed to say anything about Hitler? She never quoted him. Lieu was the ahole trying to make her look bad.
You are all idiots
I can't believe Candace Owens is taken seriously enough for this to even happen.
Yeah lol especially how she tries to defend trump,man these people are unbelievable stupid and the way one second they’ll be spewing hate and then the next they’re trying to pull God out of their ass. If I didn’t live here this would be the funniest shit on television
I’m not too familiar with US politics, but in this clip it seems she’s in her right and the judge is the one that shouldn’t be taken seriously
Candice said, "You think black people are stupid"
Judge said, "Candice, stop calling the councilor stupid"
You don't take her seriously cause you're purposely being stupid.
Oh I hope you're not one of those fo0ls who think men can be women or that you can actually change your pronouns
CNN sucks, let her have the last “word” as if that spew at the end was worth airtime
Holy shit her FACE when the camera cuts to her is absolutely priceless
she knew she was done for 😂
The entire thing was out of context
@@archiejames4739 The full clip is just as disgusting. She stated Hitler would have been an excellent nationalist leader if he did not extend his policies outside of his borders because he wouldn’t have faced resistance. It was a horrible statement both in its long and short formats.
0:31
This one?
@@chloskyskies4399 that’s it!
I can't believe cnn actually played the part where she defended herself and didn't cut up the clip like liue did
Owens probably wished they did.
except liu didn't.
Stevie are you dumb?
@@evolvedgnashty5650 yes what Stevie said was clueless and dumb, but maybe his name is Stevie liu
@Billy Reynolds Lord do I wish it were the communist news network. Unfortunately, they like Biden over there instead of the leftists :(
"Hitler wasn't a nationalist" has to be the hottest take of the decade. Christ.
time stamp
@@sapirhoffman6025
2:37
She didn’t say that idiot?
You're deaf.
@@StrykeSZN
she said, "I do not believe we should be categorizing Hitler as a nationalist" literally the same meaning, just a different way of wording.
They way she is PANTING. Haha, she's not used to being held accountable.
She is not being held accountable. She is being falsely accused.
His face looked/looks SO nonchalant and straightforward in the thumbnail, I HAD to click.
101 like
@Thanos Nope, he bended it. Using a 10 second clip out of context is just bending the word
@Thanos You say that like he did something, she responded and made him look stupid. Judging by his facial expressions and body language he was intimidated
same hahaha
Homeboy was absolutely DONE with her bullshit, LMAO.
I love how she immediately pulls the race card from a statement that had literally nothing to do with race
It has very much to do with race, they painted Her as a nazi supporter, that has A LOT to do with race, and she stated that as saying that the idiot expects minorities to not get informed of the full video. So yes, it has a lot do with race and yet again she did not pull the race card.
Wasn’t hitler against Jews (a religious group), handicapped people, lgbtq, etc? How does that involve race when they were all Germans?
@@joycet.2741 hitler was against anybody that wasn’t white straight, including blacks,hispanics, etc, so yes, he was very racist.
@@alphaone321 they painted her as someone who supports nationalist as long as they keep their business inside their own country. She didn’t mention that hitler killed the Jews, she was more worried that they invaded Poland.
Had nothing to with her race. So she pulled the race card.
@@joycet.2741 he also had plans to eradicate everyone except for Germany, Italy and spain, of course with the exception of gays and disabled people. And of course people that were part of his master race only (white, light eyes,blonde if possible)
"It's fine for him to do it in Germany, the problem was just that he wanted to take it outside of Germany" HOW ELSE DO YOU INTERPRET THAT?
She was stating whether Hitler's actions countered as NATIONALISM or not.
She wasn't defending him
Even though the way she said it was wrong
If you listen you'll know what she's trynna say
@@efrikamaya One of the most integral parts of Hitler's 'making Germany great' included the persecution, and (originally), the forced eviction of Jewish communities. Whether or not that's global, it's not okay. She should've used a better example if she meant something else.
@@BobTheOneGuy agreed. I'm not conservative per say, but definitely right leaning and to me this just feels like she was trying to get a point across and did it completely the wrong way. Then instead of admitting to the mistake she made, she doubled down in her statement and made herself look like an idiot. This was completely unprofessional and was frankly terrible on her part
@@BobTheOneGuy I agree she should have used a better example
"a nationalist doesn't kill their own people"
A nation is not a state/country. Catalans and the basque are nations within the state/country that is Spain. A nation is a group of people united by identity and a common history, culture, origin over a given territory.
Candace's statement is almost correct in that a nationalist wouldn't kill his own people. The question is what that nationalist defines as "his" people. A white nationalist wouldn't kill white people for being white but he'd kill non whites for the same. A German nationalist would kill Italians for the not being Germans. An Aryan nationalist will kill people for not being part of the Aryan race. This isn't that hard a concept to grasp but as Candace often demonstrates thinking isn't her strong suit. Just seen her defend Nick Fuentes
So Hitler wasn't a nationalist then? Owkey
In other news: _How Stalin became the defender of capitalism_
It’s okay to be a nationalist. Hitler also loved puppys so does that mean because hitler loved puppys it’s not okay to also love puppys? What is not okay is to commit mass murder and kill millions and try to force your beliefs on the entire world
Nevermind that at least 50% of communists today agree that the ussr was just a state capitalist enterprise
@@anarchistpoops161
The soviet socialists and nazi socialists were indeed top down government control.
Stop the bullshit.
Today, over 100 million libertarians and Republicans stand united against your left wing government control party.
More and more people are becoming increasingly aware of the tyrannical left wing government control socialists.
Stay tuned....
@@trevorm7013
Hitler's nazi socialist Germany and the soviet socialists were top down government control.
Today's Democrat socialist party is also top down government control.
More and more people are becoming increasingly aware of this reality.
Over 100 million libertarians and Republicans stand united against your left wing government control party.
It's the democrats who are incompatible with our principles of liberty and the bill of rights.
And more people are starting to understand that.
@@bradhuskers alright since I see you're calling the nazis socialists I'm not even gonna pretend you're in good faith. Just know that socialism is by definiton horizontal, so the ussr wasn't socialist.
“ He assumes black people are stupid”
Who said that
Wh-who said that
Edit: Can y’all stop attacking me it was just a joke I’m sorry
Nobody!!
I did
😂😐
They want racism and division to be gone yet they divide in places where no division was actually made
She did lol
Bro oh my god she said "I'm not a racist, I know jews"
bruh literally
Lol
It's like the "I'm not racist my cousins friends boyfriend is black"
Why can't she say that?
@@fisherman12k24 because those two things aren't mutually exclusive? saying that you have black/jewish/hispanic... friends doesn't automatically make you not racist
I bursted out laughing when the camera first switched to her face. She's so cooked😭😭
Because she realized he was using the clip out of context to make her look like a Hitler supporter
😂she’s always been a clown
The way the Lawmaker guy holds the phone is like a younger brother who just told on their older sibling and now has their mom on speaker yelling at the older one. 💀
This is the best comment of the video
Sumbitches they are
Nadler, Schumer, Pelosi, and where did little Adam Schiff go hide at? Haven't seen him in a while. These Democrats talk like we are crazy but its really the other way around. Hell if we are going communist I would rather run with the people that have morals instead of the ones holding a rainbow bright flag lol. U think about it
He’s fuckkng based
@Tarsa Dennis how am I a snowflake. And try to use some bigger words. I take it you are a liberal loving Democrat
@Tarsa Dennis delusional is maybe when black people that dont like white people vote for a white man that dont give 2 shits about black people lol.
the photographer in the background at 0:50 💀😭😭😭
lol, that was hilarious...didn't even notice first time
She looked like “what the hell” 😂😂😂😂
Bahahaha
"Aight Imma head out."
Camera 📸 lady be like WTF 😒😱
0:52 the person in the top right corner is like "ight, ima head out"
Lol I saw that too. She's like "Yeah lemme get out of this mess"
@@Hotpotatogal "Did you just rationali- nope"
That look of dissapointment
Makhia Bryant
😂😂
she got instantly agree and you can tell and you can tell she was trying to keep her composure by how she is looking around
I had a stroke reading that
You must agree that it's difficult to remain calm when you're being set up. Extremely difficult
@@TakeMoney-dq5zy be so for real you guys are like rats on the ground looking for excuses
What she got what
@@TakeMoney-dq5zyph please 😂
THAT PHOTOGRAPHER IN THE BACKGROUND WHEN THE CLIP IS PLAYING... I CAN’T. OMG I CANNOT.
Lmao
0:51 this one?
@@jonuhh_ yes, that vibe of “...wait... uh... yeah no, I’m out.”
Oh my god I just noticed it now that's so hilarious wtf I love that
peekaboo
Candace Owens: Black people need to stop playing the race card!
Also Candace: You're attacking me for nationalism because I'm black!
@Jennifer I find it interesting that a couple months after being evicted from her apartment because she owed $21,000 in rent, she "was "redpilled" and was hired as the director of communications at Turning Point USA-a very lucrative position.
Or maybe it's just a coincidence. Just something interesting.
What're you talking about. That's not what she said at all.
@@jerryberry3501 "It's pretty apparent the Mr Lou thinks that black people are stupid."
Where in the world did he mention black people?
@@BratWithACamera He's accusing her of being racist though and implying that she agrees with white nationalism and is racist somehow
@@jerryberry3501 So you're saying he never mentioned any other black people than Candace.
so she said that " hitler wanted all to be german and that globalism" omg, thats a supreme nationalism lol
That's fucking Imperialism
Nationalism is inherently isolationist it has nothing to do with race ffs in Spain people are proudly falangist yet that's not called Nazism because it's Civic Nationalist Syndicalism
Your just a first worldist Sjw who doesn't even realize that the first world is inhabited by spoiled children
Soon the third world shall rise up against the first world imperialists and smite them all into hell then the world shall all understand the Red flame
@@thomasandel3934 ma dude, i am marxist. true and genuine not a diictator socialist. but yes it imperialism its the same as global nationalism. in the moment you cross fooreign lines it national appropriation.
Japan is quite nationalist
She meant you know the white race to rule the world globally and that is a globalistation
Candace Owens is picking quotes and clips out of context and in her favor all the time, now she's complaining if somebody else does it with her.
"Witness may not refer to a member of the committee as stupid" LMAOO
She didnt call the committee member stupid though.
@@AbeDorf18 True Dat, Judge has no backbone to admit his mistake.
Candace owens putting pressure on them committee members she letting them know lets stop the old narrative that black people are the un educated people of the world. Never been the case Blacks are smart and gifted people. It is those who choose to believe the invisible barriers in life they fall short..
She rips into them 30 seconds later and they go quiet if watched the rest of video, let alone the hearing. They did that on purpose to enable their progressive agenda with a clip out of context.
@@jacksmash8488 he's not a judge. He's just a congrssman but yeah
Is any single person in this committee even listening to one another? Are they even hearing what they sound like themselves? Even the judge isn't paying attention.
People suck and they only get serious when something happens around them and the people they love.
It’s a bunch of idiotic clowns being clowns. Classic American politics. How in the world did those people end up representing the American public?
@@arcturus4762 stupid people vote
I mean, he's not a judge either, so....
Criticizing people for not paying attention and you call the chairman a Judge? Smh.
"My boss is a Jew. I also travelled business class for a work thing to a place where there are many many Jews. I couldn't possibly be anti semetic"
Saying that your boss is a Jew and you can’t be anti-Semitic is dumb. Most people hate their bosses.
Just a set distraction talking point.
No one accused her of being antisimetic.
They accused her of thinking what hitler did to Jews, black ppl, gays, gypsy’s etc was ok as long as he only did it to people he (and she by inference) felt were not Germans, not REAL people, within his own national borders.
Because the anti-defamation league was founded and is still seen as primarily focused on anti-semitism it opens the door for shallow arguments by the white supremacy movement to control the narrative by focusing on redirecting it toward and defending themselves against straw man arguments of antisemitism no matter what the actual accusation.
When I heard she worked for PragerU I immediately thought "oh...that explains a lot...".
She worked for PragerU which is basically a "university" (if you can even call it that) that flaunts far-right conservative ideals and notorious even among historians and academics everywhere of basically trying to alter history to fit their narrative.
Lol love this comment
0:54 the photographer turning around I'm cryinggg 😭
Why does the main judge always have to be a dude that looks like he has a couple days to live
You usually get to be committee chair (not “main judge”) through seniority. If it’s a good committee people don’t want to leave it, so you need to be on it for a long time before attrition hands you a gavel. That of course means getting older.
Twist: hes 34
@@kyos8462 who’s 34? Committee chairman Nadler is 73? I’m confused
@@unequaledlm9890 It was a joke... like, Plot Twist! The guy who looks old is actually just 34!
Silly old prick.
"Let me play a clip of Ms Owens' worrying comments about nationalism and Adolf Hitler"
Candace Owens: "Wow I can't believe you would say every black person is stupid"
Whole crowd: "bruh wtf are you talking about"
except she said nothing that supported Hitler in any way, shape or form. But I guess you'd have to have a mind of your own to listen to the WHOLE thing.
@@hola1195 maybe that's true but I have actually no clue what the fuck this is about so I won't take a site, but her saying that the other guy would think that every black person is stupid, just because he played that audio clip, is plain stupid
It's like saying: "oh? your not voted for biden? That's racist you fucking nazi!, what did black people do to you?"
She always play race card.
She's the victim, duh.
@@Kylelongwest its because everyone else plays the race card, use the ignorance in return
"A nationalist would not kill their own people"
It all depends on what he defines as "his own people".
@redfoxboss he killed his own nazi brothers and sisters though... on the slightest bit of dought if they were going to betray him he had them killed...
Ahhh...
@@dragonfire3077 He viewed it as a killong for the betterment of his nation which is a case most nationalists would make because nationalism means protecting your borders with the most efficient means or any means and the death of one of your followers for the "safety" of your nation fits that bill
She's in a hard place.
America will not acknowledge ,nationally and openly at the level of federal government,
the previous and current issues that scar black Americans of every kind socially. "Black" is not dignified and she's stepping in a good direction
but in one that does not yet exist popularly. She is making moves like race does not matter because she does not want her race to be a hindrance to her stances or ideals. Thats a hefty uphill battle. Admirable despite being problematic to some.
The American Government will hopefully take initiatives at a social level to encourage the healing of its black communities on a social level from simple things like
the shame that comes with "slave" associated ancestry as well as consistently negative stereotypes , decades perpetuated. Until the government outright speaks against and takes action toward correcting simple and detrimental social injustices without favoritism , it will be hard for anyone to see the government and the country considering black americans to be american people.
I like her conviction. I am not a republican, Nor am I a democrat or anything in between.
I've gotta do my research to officially associate BUT I support American Individuality. It is what makes us Americans.
Individuality is a uniting force, as funny as that sounds.
Exactly! A nationalist wouldn’t but he’d still refer to large groups of people as invaders or disparagingly. Kinda how Trump refers to Mexicans and Muslims.
He’s fine with “his own people”. He just doesn’t consider all Americans to be his people.
The first victims of nationalism are ALWAYS its own citizens. Regardless of whether we are talking about Hitler, Stalin or Mussolini.
“A nationalist would not kill his own people”
North Korea: 👀
Franco, Hitler, Mussolini, Salazar, Pinochet, Videla, Somoza dynasty, etc: “Are we a joke to you?!”
You're confusing totalitarianism with nationalism.
Believing in a common identity as under a national one is nationalism. Killing people for wrong think is not. Having to hold obedience to a single figurehead as being part of your own identity is not.
You just used a strawman argument, congrats.
Northkorea has nothing to do with nationalism.
It's Juche Ideology. trust me i'm korean
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juche
Basically it's god worshiping. not like any old leaders in history book
it's much more horrifying
@@a1175779 learn straw man theory and it’s applications as that wouldn’t apply here. The conversation is about nationalism and he sticks to the topic
As far as your argument, I’ll break this down using American nationalists. American nationalists don’t view liberals as American. It’s why when Fox News covers a poll, it’s “Americans prefer this, *DEMOCRATS* prefer that”
Just like American nationalists feel the leftists are unAmerican, Hitler felt that Jews were not real Germans. Under those circumstances, yes nationalists would kill their own people
Hope that helps!
@@chicodalianis8004 presenting an extreme example (NK) that is outside the framework of the argument in question (that Nationalism would result in killing their own people) and attacking that example as though it’s presenting an argument but is not (because NK is not an applicable example of nationalism, but totalitarianism which is the cause of the killing of their own people).
Thank you for having to get me to spell it out for you. Thanks for playing. Learn your logical fallacies.
This is the girl who went batshit crazy when harry styles wore a dress, right?
Yes. She said something like “the downfall of the American empire”.
@Andrea MENDENHALL
Men have been wearing dresses for ages. Your masculinity is too weak. It’s threatened by a dress.
@Andrea MENDENHALL
Nice excuse for the forefathers.
For you, blurring the lines of clothing for men and women implies that life has no meaning?
Wow...
@Andrea MENDENHALL
I didn’t like the look personally but it’s fine by me. Fashion and fads come and go.
@Andrea MENDENHALL the scots are the toughest people ever and they throw logs in the highlander games but do you know what they wear at the highlander games?
How about the roman legions are they pussies for eating vegetables and wearing skirts?
All the Europeans kings from the 16th to 18th century? I mean just look at king Louis IX he is so lady like!
Sultanates wore certain types of gowns and so did the ancient greeks though the latter is debatable but would you consider alexander the great a weakling because he wore a skirt?
She looks triggered by him playing that soundclip
@@hunterallen Yes she got dunked on. That did happen. You're comment fails to be reductive if you're acknowledging he's right.
"A nationalist would not kill their own people." You know except all the nationalist that do.
Yeah because he completely took it out of context. If you watch the full hearing she destroys him afterward
Hmm, I didn't see that. It looked like she was listening to her words and preparing to defend/stand by her comments. which she did. she never denied it, she clarified it.
@@MilitantTalker She clarified it because she never said what he thought she was saying in the first place.
She's obviously triggered cause she realized it is her saying that.. knew what they did in that moment and we already know it's what they like to do its not there first time cutting things out to make someone sound evil you wanna here evidence here the whole thing not something that's been tampered with and cut .. Candace Owens is a defending patriotic woman
She: that’s not what I said
Chairman: 🔨_(ツ)_/¯ 2:06
Murrrki THE HAMMER
Lol I like he hammer
😂😂😂
😂😂😂
Lol what type of keyboard app you use
The whole time she was talking the judge was playing angry birds. Lol
Judge? 😂😂
🤷🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️
@@user-ti2xi9bd4u this is true
This isn’t a court. There is no judge
Judge ha ha go get a fucking life
0:51 The girl with the camera is exactly how we all feel lol
She caught her in 4k
This comment broke me ;D
Not me, I know how to analyze answers like a thinking being. STEP ONE, FIND OUT WHAT THE QUESTION WAS. You try to force admission of SIMPLISTIC, MORONIC VIEWS from people, clearly without having the intelligence to understand HUMAN COMPLEXITY.
As a DEMOCRAT FOR 53 YEARS, THIS DISGUSTS ME. SICKENS ME. YOU'RE UNAMERICAN, FUEDAL, TRIBAL AND SAVAGE! *YOU MIGHT AS WELL NOT EVEN HAVE LANGUAGE IF YOU GOING TO IGNORE MEANING, SUBSTANCE AND NUANCE!* _SHAME ON YOU._
ROFL thanks. You sir are amazing at catching things.
@@sharktime5852 📸
It's just sad. She's defensive because she doesn't have a legitimate counter. She sounds like a child in a room of people trying to get a straight answer out of her.
I’m hella surprised CNN didn’t cut out Candace’s response. Kudos!
Too many other videos are available so they will take the views on youtube, i guess.
@Truth Be Told what you're asking for is literally fascist lol
Every comment I see on a CNN video is "I'm surprised they reported the full thing, this time." Like, at a certain point, we have to accept that it's Fox News that is fake.
@Robert Gray not really. CNN is pretty centrist and misrepresented Sanders' polling data. Left wing politics doesn't exist in the US. Fox News "fighting dirty" is spreading misinformation about Covid and climate change.
@Robert Gray AOC ain't a cult. Just a good politician. Just cause you don't agree with something doesn't make it an agenda.
"Hitler was a socialist"
*ENRAGED STALIN NOISES*
@Stannis Baratheon
100% correct.
Yet just take a look at all the low IQ's in these threads.
Proof that the left has corrupted the press, media and academia, which is why we see millions of brainwashed simple minds who cannot think critically.
@Stannis Baratheon hitler wasn’t a socialist
@Stannis Baratheon ok? Hitler literally killed Socialists.
@Stannis Baratheon I don’t think a socialist would be supported by large corporations...
@Stannis Baratheon when you have no idea what collectively or individualist means or the US historical context towards it epic style
I have a major disagreement with Owen’s statement “a nationalist wouldn’t kill their own people” history shows us this isn’t true, it more or less depends on who governing nationalists consider “their own people”
Ur a fuckin idiot you only think that because of Hitler
@@thewiseman1873 Compelling argument bro
And most American nationalists definitely do not consider her or anyone remotely near her skin’s hue to be “their own people”.
It's probably NOT a good idea to use a divisive, lightening rod of a person as an example in any way. It takes too long to rehabilitate the mentioned person in people's minds to get your point across.
@@thewiseman1873 lmfao "you only think that because it actually happened", great argument ya fuckin moron
Love how she throws in working for Pregur. She can't help but run back to identity politics to obfuscate her monstrous views.
He wasn’t talking about black people he was talking about you.
Dumb and ignorant; no surprise there
@Volintine Ander smh I’m black we come in many shades don’t try to play me. Malcolm X, Elijah Mohammed, Rosa Parks, President Barack Obama, and many more all light skin people. . Do that take away what they did for BLACK people, and they definitely were not treated any different... smh
Brilliant point.
Tricia, he thought she was one of the many blk Americans who refuse to research and look things up. He was hoping that was the case so he could win his argument. As you could see by the look on his face at the end, she floored him. He wasn't expecting her nonstereotypical response.
Maybe you should try to not be so predictable too. We know candace riles up your feathers because she refuses to excuse the immense dysfunction in the blk community. Deal with it.
@@ticiao what has Obummer done for blacks people?
It's amazing how people can fix their brains to hear what they want to hear and not what is actually said.
Or in this case, they don't want to hear what they themselves said.
The same people who claim Trump never denounced white supremacy!
It's called brainwashing and or being brainwashed.. Democrats have been doing it for decade's... 🇺🇲
@Phantaloo Rimush
Actually? If you don't understand that the press, media and academia are corrupted by left wing bullshit propaganda, then it's YOU who doesn't understand a GOT DAMN thing.
@@bradhuskers yeah I don’t understand a got damn thing. A GOT damn thing. Lol
Imagine if his phone started playing porn instead of the quote LMFAO.
bro what?
HuH?
U got me there ✌️😂
Shut the hell up idiot. Why the hell does this have so many likes?!
@@zonedoyestander because its funny
The way these ppl are trying to legitimize nationalism is absolutely insane to me, and it's extremely dangerous. Nationalism aims to build and maintain a single national identity. What that means is one race, one religion, one culture, one ethnicity, one language. Thats literally what nationalism is. How do you achieve that in a country that was built and is still being maintained by immigrants??? Not one country on the planet can achieve that peacefully, the US the least. And that's exactly where "nationalists don't kill THEIR OWN PEOPLE" should raise alarms.
0:50 that photographer is just a mood
Lol 😂
“Ight ima head out”
She's like wait what???
What? What the f**k!?
😏
when she tried to claim that lieu some how thought black people were stupid for using HER own words against her; isn’t that race baiting and something she has outwardly spoke against LOL ...i’m a black man btw
EXACTLY. It’s so funny and stupid. He didn’t not say black people are stupid, she herself said “Black people are stupid.”
She was saying that lieu thought black people are stupid because he wouldn't think they'd take the time to look up the full context of the clip he played to paint her as a nazi.
@@TMAJ0R exactly
i get that, but the majority of black people i’ve seen and know, already don’t like her. also why black people specifically?
@@thembzz Because the left is trying to distance her from black people trying to make it seem as if her political views don't make her black, which is stupid.
"A nationalist would not kill their own people." You know except all the nationalist that do.
Name 1
@@coreyc2005 Saddam Hussein
Thats the point genius. Then those guys are no nationalists, even if they call themselves so
@@coreyc2005 James Alex Fields Jr.
You know...the white nationalist than ran down Heather Heyer??
You can sit TF down anytime now
@Netluxe TV 🤣🤣 truth hurt your widdle brain, Sunshine? Corey asked for one..I gave him one. What's the issue, Booboo?
She clearly said “Mr Lieu believes black people are stupid.” Don’t know how so many people in the comments are so willfully ignorant. Like just go back to 1:30 in the clip!
"Nationalists would not kill their own people."
Tomatoe tomatow
I still read both words in the European pronunciation.
Let’s be real nationalists only refers to the country’s majority ethnic group nothing less nothing more
Blue lives supporters today, killing Capitol police tomorrow.
@@richardperez6945, They were not blue live supporters; they were criminals.
...socialists on the other hand....
“A nationalist would not kill his own people.”
Hm...
How do I cry in Hebrew?
Tell that to trump.
It's true. Did you listen to her?
CM 2
“No true nationalist” isn’t a proper excuse. Nationalism is inherently biased against people who are different. It isn’t always racial bias (though it usually is) but it is inherently discriminatory. It operates on a basis that people aren’t equal.
WaxDat8800 who has Trump killed?
can’t even lie the judge was just straight up wrong when he made the comments about stupid
He was just reinforcing his request to not refer to any party as stupid, she was just so mad she couldn’t look past that. Almost like saying that nothing can justify her choice of words because of her assumptions of what the other party thinks of blacks.
@@BeatBoyStill yeah that's comes out of nowhere....
@@BeatBoyStill He obviously thought she called Lieu stupid, which is completely false. She was understandably mad because he wasn’t listening properly. It does not matter if she couldn’t look past, the judge thought something else.
@@BeatBoyStill What was the need of "reinforcing" his request if she was completely within line of the rules. The judge fucked up big time.
@@apollo5418 she was seemingly heading toward saying that statement again because her initial words recalled how she was called despicable.
1. Asks question about nationalism
C.O: "Hitler wasn't so bad"
1. Nobody was talking about Hitler
Candace Owens: Makes a brand based on "I don't play the black card"
Also Candace Owens: Plays the black card in the most direct and egregious way possible
You woke people are pathetic
She never played the black card, we todd! It was played against her.
@@FreeJulianAssange23 “he obviously thinks black people are stupid” the man never mentioned her race at all
@Roman Tribunella no she used it as a shit defense for her blatant defense of hitler
@@brianvalencia9001 How do you interpret this as a defense of Hitler? Holy fuck, do you have like a ten second attention span? She literally lambasts him immediately after. The entire substance of the discussion has to do with whether or not terminology like "Nationalist" should belong to evil bad guys like Hitler, or if that terminology can describe more than just genocidal freaks. She makes that point perfectly fine (and does so much better at length), but the clip provided sure as hell doesn't show that. They attempted to character assassinate her, and Owens was too smart for that.
I bet Hitler had a favorite flavor of ice cream too, but you don't see people sniping each other over rocky road or neopolitan. The idea of Nationalism doesn't really belong to the 3rd Reich, and while I personally wouldn't die on that hill it's not like she's wrong to pursue it either. If anything, it's righteous to try and reclaim things like that away from horrible ideologies, because then they have less power over ideas. Why let Nazis win at anything anyway?
How can a black conservative pull off the race card. 💀
The thing is that she didnt pull the race card. She referred to black PEOPLE not her being a black person indivually. If it was the other way around then i would agree that would be a bad point to make.
She hates herself THAT MUCH
Bernardo Patiño no she doesn’t hate herself, she’s probably embarrassed how the US Govt treats black people like victims who are gullible. Just like how I’m embarrassed the Govt is trying to divide the awesome races in our country, instead of unite u.
OBV Paradox She did pull it though. Well tried to. Accusing Mr. Lieu of thinking all black people are stupid because he played a clip for _all_ listening humans (so you know, not just black people) to get a sense of Candace’s stances, was an attempt by her to use the race card, and an illogical attempt at that.
She tried a whole dishonest manipulative, “HEY, BLACK PEOPLE! THIS MAN THINKS _WE_ AS A WHOLE ARE STUPID! CAN YOU EVEN BELIEVE THE RACISM?! This, my fellow BLACKS and allied whites. is why you should side with me, the victim.”
That was definitely her using the race card, genius.
Lmao ikr
Girl he was coming for you, not the whole race 😂
When she said that she was referring to how the Asian guy thought that Black people wouldn’t listen to the whole clip
@@priestgwynwrestling4124 yeah, totally agree
💯
@@gavrielraskin7158 Lieu
So it’s ok for someone to edit your words for their narrative? “Girl he was coming for the whole race”
Definition of globalism: Globalism is the idea that the world's events are interconnected, and that a country's actions should take into account their impact on the rest of the world. It also refers to the belief that economic and foreign policy should be planned on a global basis, rather than for the benefit of individual countries.
Definition of nationalism: Identification with one's own nation and support for its interests, especially to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations.
If you can't figure out which of these describes Hitler, I'm gonna need you to go back to school and retake all your history classes.
What hitler did, made him a fascist. He wasn’t a socialist, people 😂. The definition is clear as day.
He called everybody who disagreed with him a dirty commie/socialist and had them killed. That of course is not gonna stop relubkcians from claiming he was a socialist lmfao
You have to be historically illiterate to think that Hitler was a socialist
EXACTLY! THANK YOU!
Actually Nazism is a branch of socialism.
@@dannyc6987 I guess hitler himself missed the memo in the1930's and called his party the Nazis.... ie, the National SOCIALIST party! Try reading history before trying to rewrite it, my friend
They tried to tangle her up like this wasn't being recorded. She clearly never called him stupid on record.
well, she is a grifter and racist. so who cares. she will do anything for money.
I don't think Nadler was trying to trip her up, I think he genuinely wasn't listening. I'm not sure if it's because he's senile, an idiot, just had a normal lapse, or because he has some character flaw, but it wasn't part of any game.
@@empathicqubit I would lean to the senile….
I think by the look on his face he was like … oh well my mistake oops
No she just accused him of being racist against all black people 😒 🙄 😐
Played the race card right off the bat.
Then gives a speech about how she doesn't use her race to play the victim.
The woman next to her is killing me with the faces😭😭
😂
Check the person with a camera at 0:50
@@bilalthefighter829 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Yep. Low IQ types always struggle with Candace Owens.
@@BLane-xr1ic wot
i cannot comprehend how candy owens literally shames black people for using the race card and then abuses it like that 💀
The same way you ppl cry abt the corrupt system and then act like it didn't just happen in this vid.
She tried pulling the black card for no reason...
She defends black people. Phone-guy plays fraction of a conversation, that makes her look like a nazi.
It’s just common knowledge that democrats think black people are useless and dumb. That’s why they think voter ID laws are racist toward black people. Democrats actually think black people are too stupid and too poor to have things like an ID or internet. It’s insanely racist. It’s exactly why Malcolm X hate white Liberals.
Every black person does it, why are you so shock?
@@corywilliamson6238 Ain't that the truth.
@@rhrndz0312 Lol, EVERY black person? A bit of generalizing don't you think, pal?
“If Hitler just wanted to make Germany great again, I’m okay with that”
Cries in Hebrew
It’s out of context she was answering a question look for the full clip
@로트링 that my friends was a low iq statement because none of you obviously have watched the entire clip.
so you cut the video there and didnt listen to the response, got it. Typical.
I hate the Nazi regime as a minority. History clearly showed why Hilter like Moa was able to come to power. China CCP is a communist nationalist country. So, do you actively support China CCP?
Hebrews aint a thing its fictional
0:50 that lady in the back 😂😂
She was like danm he caught you in 4k
Lol
“Oh, hell no I’m outta here.”
Lmfao
😂😂😂 she literally gave the ... "Bruh " look
What did this have to do with "black people being stupid" Candice? Do YOU think everyone else is stupid enough to fall for that 'defence'?
"A nationalist would not kill their own people."
Me, an American in 2020: 🤔
Natasha Hart The problem with nationalism is it’s narcissistic, in that people forget that the world doesn’t revolve around just one nation or one specific group of people. Often times it gets mistaken for Patriotism by it’s supporters, when in reality it’s a veiled excuse for being bigoted against any views, races, ethnicities, & religions that are not considered a part of the ideology. To take pride in being a part of this Nation is one thing, but to think that it justifies certain actions that either suppress or become harmful to others is when the line gets crossed. I’ve literally seen a video on TH-cam of a Trump rally where a supporter approached him in a “KKK For Trump” T Shirt, and watched the crowd cheer this guy on & start chanting “USA” & throwing up Nazi salutes. Now to Trumps credit, he didn’t feed into this & got the guy thrown out, but once he did that, that same crowd that was just cheering this guy on & chanting “USA” flipped the switch real quick & were now acting like they weren’t just throwing up Nazi salutes like 30 seconds prior. Point is, if a whole room full of “Americans” were just associating the KKK & Nazi’s with “USA” & Nationalism, what’s that tell you?
Natasha Hart I think the bigger question is why would anyone subscribe to an ideology that practices “the exclusion & detriment of others?” That shouldn’t be the type of country we strive to be either. I think more often than not, people get too hung up on being Republicans & Democrats, Socialists or Nationalists, Liberals & Conservatives, and need to get back to just being “Americans” & human beings (I’m an Independent BTW, so to me, both sides of the political spectrum are flawed). Wrong is wrong, regardless of who it benefits. It’s time for us as a country to stop with all the “finger pointing” & start doing some serious “soul searching”...
Bottom line is, there’s no such thing as an “Independent” Nation. We’re all Interdependent on one another, whether we like it or not. If people really want to be “Nationalists”, then we shouldn’t be relying on other countries for anything. We shouldn’t be using places like Mexico & China for cheap labor & goods, We should be manufacturing everything we sell in the US (the biggest reason for poverty in this country is the outsourcing of jobs). We shouldn’t be importing our oil from Saudi Arabia, or precious metals from Africa. We should be relying on the natural resources under our own soil. We shouldn’t be borrowing money from other Nations, or setting up Military bases in foreign countries. We don’t want to be “globalists”, but we still feel entitled & demand access to global resources. That’s not “Nationalism.”
LA Lakers th-cam.com/video/mpLANIpZxdU/w-d-xo.html look at what are people are doing on American soil.
Natasha Hart No, I know how foreign dependency works, but it doesn’t make us any less dependent on these weaker countries to provide us with cheap labor & resources. As Nationalists (in theory) shouldn’t we be more concerned w/ self preservation & self sufficiency? So how can we do that when our money & resources are tied in w/ the rest of the world’s wealth & natural resources? Our stocks, bonds & prices rise & fall right along w/ everybody else’s when things go right or wrong around the globe, so we’re just as dependent on them to provide labor & raw meterials as they are on us for business & money. Which again, is global interdependence, not National Independence. That would be like me acting like I’m doing you a favor by giving you gas money, to drive me back & forth to work everyday cause I don’t have a car of my own.
Natasha Hart Unfortunately we may already be too vulnerable. China is the biggest manufacturing country in the world. Not only do they own & operate all their own manufacturing, but most of our (Western Civilizations) factories as well. Plus with their recent interests in Africa, now they’re able to gain easy access to raw materials & land for farming. So they’re more engaged in Nationalism than we are, meaning they’re way more self reliant from us than we are of them. You gotta think China, Japan, & Korea make up at least 60-80% of all manufacturing of our technology & goods. & we’ve been dependent on them for this since at least the 70’s (when Nixon reopened relations). We’re in debt to them, we do little to no manufacturing over here of our own, & there’s not a whole lot that they buy from us, that they don’t already make themselves (the only thing we really make that other countries want is our guns & weapons). So how are we expected to roll that genie back in the bottle? We’d have to pay off our debts w/ them, plus bring back manufacturing to the states before we could ever be free from dependence...
& not only China, but the Middle East for fossil fuels, India & Mexico for our manufactured goods also, & Africa for their natural resources. That’s what I mean by interdependence. As a consumer based economy, We’re almost completely incapable of supplying our own demand, if we had to rely solely on our own “National” Resources.
How does him showing a clip of something she said insinuate that he thinks black people are stupid? I mean these assumption make sense coming from someone that works at Prager U lmao
how do u work at prager u lol
Ummm cause he thought black people wouldn't look up the context
Many do not research the entirety of clips presented in the news and automatically form an opinion. This does not only pertain to black people, but to all. The panel was trying to change the narrative of her argument. Listen to the entire hearing to understand why she said this. It makes more sense.
@@rociolinares9367 She's a dumbass that's just chasing the bag there's nothing more to it, ever wonder who's behind Prager U or other conservative propaganda distributers.
@@georgecabrera9039 Prager is behind Prager U? He literally makes videos on his own site. Why doesn't George Soros show up since he owns most of the leftist media? Another main conservative media is Louder with Crowder and we obviously know who owns that one
Owens: "A nationalist would not kill their own people."
Sure Miss Owens, just know that no one outside of your political community uses your definition of nationalism.
Nationalists do indeed not kill their own people. They are, however, very good at making people into Others, and Others are ok to kill.
This. Nationalists don't kill their own. What they do do, is increasingly create minor delineations between the people they used to define as "their people" do that they can turn them into "the other", which is okay to genocide.
The google definition of nationalism states that they would have support for there nations interests. Shes just saying we shouldnt characterize all nationalists as hitler 🤷♀️
@@zentempo7902 Some nationalists aren't bad, but in general unchecked nationalism leads to people thinking that anything is justified for the good of their nation, including at the expense of others. That flavour of nationalism is the one Owens indulges in.
She's also pushing the PragerU (not a real school) myth that Hitler was a socialist and tries to associate liberal socialism with Nazi ideology despite the fact that the Nazi party actively dismantled Worker's unions. She claims people trying to promote social justice are the real racists, and other such nonsense.
Her ideology is aligned with that of PragerU, a radical organisation who is not to be trusted as it is run by many deeply selfish people. I thought they were a legitimate organisation when I first saw their videos, but I was lucky enough that eventually I questioned their thinking after their anti-immigrant sentiment became clear (my father was the son of German immigrants and I feel a degree of sympathy for anyone forced to leave their country because of war and violence.)
@@solarisengineering15
You just displayed a very low IQ.
The problem is her saying this about Hitler and on another side having bullyied Black Lives Matter and been a black voice for Trump. That is the problem.
Candace: “You didn’t listen 👂🏽to what I said.”
Mr Nadler: 🤷🏻♂️ 🔨
In his mind, he's thinking of her in sexual way. Like yeah I wasn't listening.
@@LuiEVero I'm sorry you didn't understand my comment. That means it wasn't meant for you to get it.
@@LuiEVero hahaha....you're funny. Maybe you might undersrand this....blip bloop blap.
i have the gavel, nader?
She is a pathological hypocrite and you're focusing on that?
How embarrassing.
That judge was napping, they need a new judge he wasn’t even listening to the proceedings, someone should fire him smh
Ah she needed a pump of the brakes. He just jumped in with the little hammer thingy. Bang bang stfu for a second bihhhh
Not a judge. This isn’t a court. He’s a chairmen. This is congress.
Deadass tho
He’s a chairman yuh dip shit lol caint put your 2 cents in if you don’t even knw what a bank is 😂
She may not have literally called him stupid, but her comment certainly was disparaging
"a nationalist doesnt kill his own people"
Thats right, because a nationalist choose who his people is.
I disagree. A Nationalist considers anyone who is a citizen of that nation as his/her people.
@@jeremysoon2b19 nope, because in a nation you dont have to love the country, or do you dont even need to care about it to be a citizen, nationalist always put away people who are not nationalist enough, and exclude Them, with names that erase their nationality, like the German communists
@@TheMaztercom I agree with the 1st part and disagree with the second part. Nationalist don’t exclude people of their nation because of different beliefs. They may disagree with those people, sure. But they still consider those they disagree with as part of the nation
@@jeremysoon2b19 well, nowdays we dont have a lot of nationalist, only one I think is trump, and he wanted all foreigns to "assimilate" to american culture, this is basically, be like the nation, or dont be, also, a nation has his owns beliefs, so I dont know a nationalist can still accept a guy who thinks is good to worship a flying spaguetti, when the nation beliefs says a flying spaguetti is a pagan god, I doubt a nationalist would put some guys with other beliefs first, in any case, nationalists will force an assimilation campaign, and thats is almost the same as excluding, cause if you are not part of the nation you are a traitor, I mean, nationalist first objective is to make a nation the most homogenous possible, because different beliefs and different opinions produce clash between citizens, so I dont see how, not excluding different people of the nation is not a nationalist trait, if we analyze nationalist trough history (hilter, churchill, alexander the Great, julius cesar, some more) they excluded or forced people to assimilate, cause nationalist objective is to make a nation strong, and you make a nation strong with clear beliefs and objectives, only made possible is most of the country believe in them
@@TheMaztercom I disagree with your premise that a Nationalist won’t people like pastafarians as people of this nation. I’m an atheist and nationalist. I live in one of, if not the most religiously diverse countries in the world. I consider Americans who believe any number of things that I disagree with, as Americans .
The chairman may have misheard what she said but Candice also completely fabricated anyone suggesting that black people were stupid, intentionally deflecting to try to keep people on her side
I don’t agree with this lady’s politics, but it was incredibly frustrating when the judge wasn’t even listening and said that she called the guy stupid 🤦🏼♂️
She implied it
@@mrducky6322 she literally didn't whatsoever
@@mrducky6322 ... did you not hear what she said either?? She said that he believed that black people were stupid...
@@brunobucciarati7278 These people are brainwashed, they very literally can't hear things that counter what they have been told to believe.
That's the only way you can watch this and not see it for exactly what it is.
@@mrducky6322 She didn’t imply it, you moron. She said that leftists think that Black people are stupid and won’t go and search out the entire question and answer. She neither said, nor implied that Lieu is stupid. Even though he obviously is. I know many of you leftists need help with words. So there you go. All better now.
Now, I don’t politically agree with Candace Owens, but the chairman completely contorted her words.
How
@@catsdogsbaby8318 She said the lawmaker thinks she is stupid, and the chairman stopped her from speaking because he thought she was calling the lawmaker stupid, when that is not what she said.
@@JScott-md6dv oh yeah that is true except she said that they think that black people are stupid.
Yes! So true. He said she called the other congressman stupid and that is not even CLOSE to what she said
I think its bad on both sides. What hilter was doing even in the confines of his own country is not ok. No one should be persecuted within the borders of any nation for their religious beliefs, skin color, sexuality etcetera. You can not take one step of his plots and call it great if that was so I would take my time in highschool and say I'm the smartest kid in the world because I had higher grades.
She was going CRAZY inside when he started playing that tape
It was funny to see her writhe like that 😂.
Yep.
yup
Well, what she said is true, Hitler's problem was aggressive foreign policy. She's not legitimizing Hitler, but pointing out his main problem.
Fausto Chavez It doesn’t matter, you cannot use Hitler for any defense, he was a mass murderer. Period. His only problem was he murdered millions of people.
The amount of time that she's disrespected is insane, like i get that you don't agree with her but calling her dispecable and interuppting her every time, like you can't call youself a feminist and disrespecting cristian women and conservetive women.
"I can't be a racist against a race that doesn't exist anymore"
-TFS Freezer-
“You condescending, sadistic, callous M0THERFUCK3R”
-Tfs gohan at freezer
@@djskjyy pardon?
@@djskjyy *gets beaten*
@@darthbravo3895 lmao it’s one of my favorite quotes from tfs gohan
"Daddy I don't want to be on namek anymore"
Remember when Candice Owens was in a PragerU video that argued against using the race card?
Pepperidge farm remembers
Uh,,,speaking specifically of blacks in an appropriate setting on an appropriate topic is NOT playing the race card.
Are you awake?
Playing the race card is USING you race to get around looking at a situation justly.
Not taking responsibility.
In this case, CO called out the left's little drama - a hearing on the rise of hate crimes by white nationalists .
Just another of their tactics they use to scare and disgust you.(us)
So you will vote for them.
We - CO, myself and others - strongly reject to being manipulated like that.
Just show us how to reach the American dream and we'll get going.
That's what blacks need to succeed.
This isn't playing the race card. This was mentioning it at a proper and necessary moment, as it was the topic at hand, which you would understand more had you watched at least 10-15 minutes of this hearing, instead of 3.
Steph J
Lieu: shows clip of CO making questionable comments about hitler
CO:“I think it’s pretty apparent that mr lieu thinks that black people are stupid...”
Totally not using her race to deflect an argument. At all.
@Steph J are you saying hate crimes haven't risen? because there is plenty of evidence that would prove you wrong.
what does being black have to do with any of this??
Nothing they just blame their race for everything so they get what they want
The Morgue don’t say “they” like it’s some blanket statement, dickhead
Booty Bandit exactly
@@TheMorgueBasicSlasherFan lol. So democrats are the racists now? XD
The Morgue oh shut up she pointed out the hypocrisy that liberals have with black people now you hypocrites crying about using the race card
I saw the thumbnail and was like, “is that candace owens?” Then the congressman disappointedly introduced candace owens 😂
This women got crazy when Harry styles wore a dress and called it the downfall of American empire.
I can never take her seriously lol.
I can't take leftist seriously
It is the downfall of the west. The west is in a moral decay and men are being feminized because masculinity has deemed toxic by the left
@@libertypatriot4357 she's not a part of the left though 😂 she's a conservative
@@elliot04877 um no, people are now feeling comfortable about breaking gender norms. There are plenty of masculine men and feminine women who are not toxic. Just because someone wants to break a gender norm doest mean that "society is collapsing" it actually means that the society is becoming more accepting of those that were once seen as "other"
@@toomuchglitters7254 don't fool yourself, the west is in a sharp decline because of this moral decay. Traditional countries with strong masculine and feminine divide like china and india are taking over. This idea of breaking norms and tolerance is dividing and killing the west from the inside