Antisymmetric relation

[@MetroDon]

Go to the last 15 seconds to understand.

[@rvnth2633]

Yes u are crct

[@shabeebsha4254]

Tnks

[@The_attacker99]

😂

[@AnuragRawat01]

I wish i had done whatever you said so i would have been able to save my 2 minutes 😅😅😅😂😂

[@mohamedgaming8542]

you made it 200x complicated honestly

[@Foxbat-25]

Agree😂👍

[@awadheshkumarsah6464]

Absolutely right

[@shriyashkothe5122]

Skill issue

[@shriyashkothe5122]

It's just if (a,b) is there then (b,a) should not be there
And he used height in such a way that 'a' should be taller than 'b' and thus inverse cannot be true

[@tharunupputuri227]

Agreed

[@Jorge-is6vv]

i love you. for another clarification, for example, if (1,5) is in the relation THEN (5,1) CANNOT be in the relation (for it to be antisymmetric). Also, if (1,1) is in the relation, then it continues to be antisymmetric by definition. That is, all "reflexive" ordered pairs (1,1), (2,2), (3,3) and so on, are antisymmetric.

[@kartikeygupta4075]

Bro u explained better

[@harshjoshi132]

is se jayada complicated explanation pure yt pr nahi hai

[@emperor8716]

2:00 watch from here

[@jsl_21]

he got me in the first few minutes , but last few seconds made everything right.. pheww

[@AbdullahManea-gx2zw]

Thank you for relating it with reality

[@lejim8298]

He is right, think before you comment

[@fredesl406]

very well explained thank you so much!

[@shrpnss]

Good example. Thank you!

[@Windgi]

vefry nice work,,,,acche se samajh gayaa ,,,,maja aa gaaya ,,, ohh yeaahhh

[@meghakaushal4780]

This is correct guys. Please watch the full video before commenting

[@Mumtaz.Academy]

Sir Akheer kr di app my to love you. Your teaching mehtod so good

[@yashchandwani5786]

Who stumbled from IITM online degree (python) here 😂

[@madWorld123]

Thank you. The best explanation

[@МаксимЛукянчук-у7ы]

you are so good thx you very much
from KZ with love

[@stiventrialvin5762]

ty sir, for your explanation

[@xavierhillroy2461]

Great Video!

[@JamesBrodski]

Thank you for making this video. Amazing!

[@u-k]

ur goated

[@khan-iz3jf]

Good sir

[@mohamedtabrez6561]

thank you very much for making this so simple

[@prelearning6911]

Last seconds are very imp to understand

[@ujendraclasses]

Crystal clear sir thank you sir

[@3e815]

Thank you, I get it now

[@Priya10982]

Very good explanation

[@KuldeepKhalotiya-s4k]

Thanku sirrrrrrrr 😅

[@suryadarshankandari7903]

pure gold👌

[@ramankr0022]

very helpful

[@trezsman9908]

finally i understand, thank u

[@mominmia8391]

From Bangladesh ❤️

[@audiobook_for_free_]

Thank you so much

[@bryannac8541]

thank you!! great explanation.

[@naveenghai6824]

Is it true that every relation which is not symmetry is anti symmetry

[@TheScorpionAly]

no, not true

[@siddharthjoshi3328]

If you take all the diagonal elements, it is going to be symmetric as well as antisymmetric together. So NO, that's not the case

[@Wertunsy]

No, for eg. (a,a) is both symmetric and anti symmetric

[@AMIBangladeshi-t8p]

thanks

[@mnaeemsalarzai]

well explained

[@hannynameirakpam815]

Thank you 😭

[@mrsingh754]

This is asymmetric relation not antisymmetric relation

[@mustafaqureshi7547]

2:05 thank me later

[@thamizharasikathirvel1232]

👌

[@mathisfi.5593]

i finally get it

[@interesting7471]

slow

[@emanergza6383]

Wrong definition

[@ImranHussain-ye7zm]

sir tell wrong about antisymmetric
it not same with book
sir is you are not prepard lactur before deliver

[@dhruvjha2776]

hahhahahah imran bhai appni english sudharo , firr galti deikhao , dusro ki galti nikalne se pehle ani galti dekho

[@siruvurivarchaswi1144]

@@dhruvjha2776 he is trying to comment on the way he explained the topic ,but u r commenting about his grammatical mistakes, grow up dude ! It's not funny or cool anymore

[@jsl_21]

@@siruvurivarchaswi1144 he deserves it!! he didn't even watched the full vid before commenting.

[@anishvenigalla5945]

@@jsl_21 true

[@jankichaudhari9427]

THIS IS SO WRONG !!!

[@SatnamSingh-vq3ko]

Wrong

[@prasadchekka2948]

Wrong sir

[@khan-iz3jf]

Good sir