The design of the image is usually associated with y2k aesthetics; it's cool to see places I totally forgot about, where it was used years before that!
I grew up in the 90's so the Y2K aesthetic definitely defined a lot of what I still think is appealing, but I swear, a lot of the foundational stuff hasn't aged at all, and is actually getting more and more popular again. I think its timeless, in a lot of respects (from an aesthetic POV anyway).
There is no such thing as Y2K aesthetics, it's just a social media trend on profiles that publish graphic design issues and then clothing brands began to mix their products with a desire and dream of an issue that simply existed organically in an era without any name and that now a tag was added (2010) to capitalize on it and thus sell something supported by the illusion of an era that has nothing to do with the name Y2K aesthetics, I started working in graphic design in 1993 and believe me, we didn't call any of that Y2k aesthetics, not even at the beginning of the New Millennium.
@@wallendiaz Your right, but isn't it still useful as a term to help classify things? The same thing applies to every period of art. It takes the benefit of hindsight to see it in the context of the wider picture of time & culture. In the 70's there was no such thing as "70's" style, and in the 80's there was no "80's" etc etc. It was just 'contemporary'. Meaning is what we make ourselves in the present. Personally I find Y2K stuff to be a very optimistic school of design (although no doubt thats probably a lot to do with nostalgia).
![[#2024MAMA] G-DRAGON - 무제(Untitled, 2014)+POWER+HOME SWEET HOME+뱅뱅뱅+FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ox29z5Nf1Uk/mqdefault.jpg)
so fire the chills
The design of the image is usually associated with y2k aesthetics; it's cool to see places I totally forgot about, where it was used years before that!
Y2k aesthetics are futuristic
I grew up in the 90's so the Y2K aesthetic definitely defined a lot of what I still think is appealing, but I swear, a lot of the foundational stuff hasn't aged at all, and is actually getting more and more popular again. I think its timeless, in a lot of respects (from an aesthetic POV anyway).
Agreed!
There is no such thing as Y2K aesthetics, it's just a social media trend on profiles that publish graphic design issues and then clothing brands began to mix their products with a desire and dream of an issue that simply existed organically in an era without any name and that now a tag was added (2010) to capitalize on it and thus sell something supported by the illusion of an era that has nothing to do with the name Y2K aesthetics, I started working in graphic design in 1993 and believe me, we didn't call any of that Y2k aesthetics, not even at the beginning of the New Millennium.
@@wallendiaz Your right, but isn't it still useful as a term to help classify things? The same thing applies to every period of art. It takes the benefit of hindsight to see it in the context of the wider picture of time & culture.
In the 70's there was no such thing as "70's" style, and in the 80's there was no "80's" etc etc. It was just 'contemporary'. Meaning is what we make ourselves in the present.
Personally I find Y2K stuff to be a very optimistic school of design (although no doubt thats probably a lot to do with nostalgia).
That good shit
❤️
DOOOpE!
❤🔥❤🔥❤🔥❤🔥
song very liked
Hmm
Couldn't have said it better myself.
@@poyntz1448I’m certain your Him and Hymn would also be impeccable 🙂🥸