In the last duel, illusionist -> gilgamesh, trade into khawy, he heals 4 up to 5, and then 2nd illusionist -> gilgamesh face is lethal......RIP missed opportunities
Felt like Ignideus only created the video for the sake of creating it. He's the first SV player I followed on TH-cam and most of his videos I watched doesn't really showcase too much of the core card/combo. I'm not hating on his videos or what, look at Kulo Gaming. He did a great job on showcasing meme deck. By the way, I still enjoyed Ignedeus' videos though. Keep up the work!
look igini..i love you..but you need to show more game where you actually play the core card if you are gonna make a video about it. Theres a lot of your video that doesnt really showcase the core card of the deck.
servant berserker youre right :( people say that in the last duel, he actually can use the double illusionist to spawn gilgamesh two time and finish using it.
You've got a good point there. I try to showcase how the deck plays regularly rather than aim for hitting the headlining card/synergy every time, and as long as the video is entertaining and shows the deck being piloted I usually feel it's fine. Still, it makes sense that people would want to see the feature that makes the deck stand out. I'll keep that in mind.
You're wrong, this is definitely no an normal Oz deck, he only had 1 spell (X3) in his deck, Legendarys does not always have to be the spotlight in the deck.
Some of the legendaries in this game are freaking crazy as all hell Hearhtstone aint got sheeet on Wizardess of Oz Although, Hearthstone did better at balancing Until the latest expansion was revealed...
Yeah, Precious Bloodfangs is a good card in situations, like to get a board. It is really good for aggro if you have Vania (card) on the board, and if your opponent has quite a few followers. Only problem is, if you go against an different aggro player, that damage to your self could be bad. Also I don't go full aggro on my blood bat deck, sometimes, I do strategic trading.
Yeah, you REALLY HAVE to manage the board in this meta, like, you can't just leave 3 neutral minions on your opponent's board and be like, "Eh, that's fine", until you take 10 to the face. I think bloodfang is insane if you go first and your opponent doesn't have a turn 1 play. Bloodfangs + Yurius into turn 3 Grimnir seemsgood
12:06 Why not just Illusionist the Professor back and play the Dwarf Alchemist? Kills the Cerb with the professor, nets you a two 2/2 bodies, and a 4/4 body and saves your evo point.
Depends. Does it also banish amulets? If it only banishes followers then it's no better than Acolyte's light, but if it also banishes amulet that could be a replacement to DoD in most decks Not to say that Acolyte's light is terrible, but it has little effect and mostly worse than DoD if you're not playing against shadow, but even then, turn 5 only removing 1 minion against a class that can very easily refill their board wouldn't feel too good.
I don't think single-target banish is good in the current meta, especially with the prevalence of Neutral engines, you can't afford to waste turn 5 removing 1 minion using a single-target spell- you'll get run over. It's going to be good mostly against dragon (Ouroboros and any large minions), and to a lesser extent, shadow (Khawy, Thane, Mordecai), but otherwise it's situational against other classes compared to DoD.
you coul've won the game with illusionis trade the gilgamesh he goes up to 5 then you play the second illusionist and kill him....also what kind of ladder did you teleport into? or maybe this is not ranked
In the last duel, illusionist -> gilgamesh, trade into khawy, he heals 4 up to 5, and then 2nd illusionist -> gilgamesh face is lethal......RIP missed opportunities
whats the point of winning if it isn't in style? xD
Mike Moran My point exactly. Ignideus READ here n learn to CALCULATE! You're living in Singapore with so many calculative Chinese around you lol.
Inthink illusionist gives the follwer rush not storm
Wow. Her ta ta's really bounce during that evolve animation!
Felt like Ignideus only created the video for the sake of creating it. He's the first SV player I followed on TH-cam and most of his videos I watched doesn't really showcase too much of the core card/combo. I'm not hating on his videos or what, look at Kulo Gaming. He did a great job on showcasing meme deck. By the way, I still enjoyed Ignedeus' videos though. Keep up the work!
I might need to play this now. Great video
look igini..i love you..but you need to show more game where you actually play the core card if you are gonna make a video about it. Theres a lot of your video that doesnt really showcase the core card of the deck.
servant berserker youre right :( people say that in the last duel, he actually can use the double illusionist to spawn gilgamesh two time and finish using it.
You've got a good point there. I try to showcase how the deck plays regularly rather than aim for hitting the headlining card/synergy every time, and as long as the video is entertaining and shows the deck being piloted I usually feel it's fine. Still, it makes sense that people would want to see the feature that makes the deck stand out. I'll keep that in mind.
Well let's just hope his streak with Tyrant doesn't carry on to other meme combos.
What was it, Curate, Roland, and most recently, Bahamut
@@Ignideus yes ingini play the cool card on the thumbnail
illusionist is probably my favorite rune card this expansion.
Seems like a really fun deck to play!
uses the illusionist at 17:35, no need to thank me. otherwise it's a normal oz deck.
You're wrong, this is definitely no an normal Oz deck, he only had 1 spell (X3) in his deck, Legendarys does not always have to be the spotlight in the deck.
can you play Abomination Awakened igni? i've thinking about making the deck but i have no clue what cards to use, thanks :)
Hmm, Gilgamesh could be the replacement of Elder Mage Dragonlore.
I have been wondering what to trade him with and now i know what ;)
Tfw you see someone playing Gilgamesh
He's not a bad card anymore, Playable in Jabberwock decks aswell.
Nice video mate
Archer Class Gilgamesh approves.
Chu Chu Mongrels..
The Deck name isn't even The Gate of Babylon, Disappointed.
Some of the legendaries in this game are freaking crazy as all hell
Hearhtstone aint got sheeet on Wizardess of Oz
Although, Hearthstone did better at balancing
Until the latest expansion was revealed...
I was hyped for the Illusionists, but the girls never came... THE GIRLS NEVER CAME!
Anyone else find that the best target for Illusionist is Professor Of Taboos?
Unlimited Mongrel Works...Fate/stay night much?
Aggro bat blood and Test of strength shadow? Hello?
Moshi moshi~
meta desu~
I still play bat blood :P (without the wolf card)
Which brings me to the question : do you think Precious Bloodfangs is a good card for aggro? That card seems interesting
Yeah, Precious Bloodfangs is a good card in situations, like to get a board. It is really good for aggro if you have Vania (card) on the board, and if your opponent has quite a few followers. Only problem is, if you go against an different aggro player, that damage to your self could be bad. Also I don't go full aggro on my blood bat deck, sometimes, I do strategic trading.
Yeah, you REALLY HAVE to manage the board in this meta, like, you can't just leave 3 neutral minions on your opponent's board and be like, "Eh, that's fine", until you take 10 to the face.
I think bloodfang is insane if you go first and your opponent doesn't have a turn 1 play. Bloodfangs + Yurius into turn 3 Grimnir seemsgood
What Craft is the second one guys?
Luci Mară Runecraft
12:06 Why not just Illusionist the Professor back and play the Dwarf Alchemist? Kills the Cerb with the professor, nets you a two 2/2 bodies, and a 4/4 body and saves your evo point.
What does everyone think of a neutral card that cost 5 that banishes?
Depends. Does it also banish amulets? If it only banishes followers then it's no better than Acolyte's light, but if it also banishes amulet that could be a replacement to DoD in most decks
Not to say that Acolyte's light is terrible, but it has little effect and mostly worse than DoD if you're not playing against shadow, but even then, turn 5 only removing 1 minion against a class that can very easily refill their board wouldn't feel too good.
I would like that. That way odin is not the only thing that can remove the op things.
I don't think single-target banish is good in the current meta, especially with the prevalence of Neutral engines, you can't afford to waste turn 5 removing 1 minion using a single-target spell- you'll get run over.
It's going to be good mostly against dragon (Ouroboros and any large minions), and to a lesser extent, shadow (Khawy, Thane, Mordecai), but otherwise it's situational against other classes compared to DoD.
Why you not use Illusionist in last duel…you can win use Illusionist
Zashu
you coul've won the game with illusionis trade the gilgamesh he goes up to 5 then you play the second illusionist and kill him....also what kind of ladder did you teleport into? or maybe this is not ranked
It's definitely ranked. I mean, ha, what is tove blood anyways amirite
magic Illusionist sucks bc it gets rid of of all your earth sigils