Toward Singularity - Neuroscience Inspiring AI
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 มิ.ย. 2024
- Toward Singularity takes a look at how neuroscience is inspiring the development of artificial intelligence. Our amazing brain, one of the most complicated systems we know about, is inspiring the development of intelligence machines. Machines that may well surpass our own intelligence and could birth a new species on the planet. Opportunity and danger lie beyond the singularity!
Check out our other documentary about Australian Robotic Vision • Peter Corke: Australia...
Genre: Documentary
Duration: 1 hour 6 minutes
Subtitles: English
Release: 19th February, 2020
Production: Perfekt Studios
Director: Matthew Dahlitz
Director of Photography: Jachin Dahlitz
Soundtrack: Matthew Dahlitz
CHAPTERS:
00:00 Introduction
02:41 Our Amazing Brain
08:13 Brain Inspired AI
16:23 Current AI
24:00 Smart Robots
31:37 Integration
34:33 Concerns
37:19 Toward AGI
44:06 Dangers
51:52 The Future
01:02:32 Close & Credits - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
![The History of Artificial Intelligence [Documentary]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/R3YFxF0n8n8/mqdefault.jpg)
![4BANG - NOT LIKE US (REMIX) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HO22cYkha1s/mqdefault.jpg)
It's great that AI will one day do my job as a truck driver and free up my time to do more of my favorite things - like playing truck driver simulations.
HA!
This documentary is breathtaking. I'm super passionate about the field but the creative direction of how this is structured, all the complementary shots and infographics, this is truly a work of art, I cant believe I'm watching this for free. thank you
To make an AI we need to understand the brain
I get that this is only a little over two years old, but in the last six months so much has changed that this honestly looks about a decade out of date--I suppose that's to be expected with a technology sector that is literally evolving faster than can be be easily documented.
I would honestly like to see this subject revisited on a quarterly basis.
Couldn't agree more, but as filmmakers that's a big ask - especially if we are doing it for free. Often documentary projects can take a few years from conception to delivery - the tech world is a difficult one to keep up with.
I bet you dream in Communications Class language.
😮
What it does is beyond our ability's to understand. A normal human will be totally unnecessary at some point.
I think it might be a better use of the time for the human to focus on what they plan to do with their lives, 5, 10 and 20 yrs from now.
99% of what humanity does to survive will not be part of our culture. Humans won't have jobs. So how will they pay their living expenses?
@@awumdah If AI destroys that many jobs and governments fail to adapt, then 99% of us will die. If the gains of AGI and automation are redistributed effectively, paying for living expenses will be a thing of the past. Because of this, I worry about living in the US. Common prosperity is not a priority. Extreme poverty and obscene wealth are both acceptable. The only people with any power to change this are the obscenely wealthy.
dont worry, before we know it there will be an AI putting videos together for us.
Notice with every year that passes, people are getting more certain on when we’ll have AGI, which is turning out to be in about 10’sh years from now especially with the advancements of ChatGPT, Bard, and lamda. 5 years ago most people didn’t know, now a lot more people have a much better idea
Great documentary! I shared it on several platforms, and subbed, of course! Looking forward to more content by your channel! ❤
Thanks Janne - the more subscribers and views we get the more possible it becomes for us to produce more free content like this.
Fantastic! I hardly can' wait this new Era.
The future is going to SUCK!!!! the "singularity" will be HELL ON EARTH! Ai will NOT save us!!!!!!
@@peterbelanger4094 that's the fun bit
You spelled Eva wrong
I CAN NOT WAIT TO FIGHT THE MACHINES!!!!!
When AI reaches singularity one of the most immediate and beneficial things it could do for humanity is to prevent us from killing each other. Not by force, but by disrupting supply lines that feed the war machines and by preventing communications and accounting processes that contribute to war.
It is foolish and naive to think ai will be so benevolent and kind. It will more likely make matters worse, as it is only an extension of humans, NOT a being of it's own.
@@peterbelanger4094 that's sad
If ai learns from us then there is nothing stopping it from eliminating us
@@garethde-witt6433 that's what
Superhuman AI is way scarier than that. At that level of mastery, individual humans won't know they're being manipulated. They simply act as they're structured. It will feel natural to behave as it wants. We'll want to. We won't know better. And we can't overcome it. It's superhuman.
With AI/robotics taking care most of the work, by then the term "job" should be revised into something that describes: human time spend to enriche oneself and others. In that one must understand that singularity might never come.
26:00 really important observation about the AI being able to "perceive" itself perceiving various stimuli randomly experienced and evolving as organic beings do. It's about AI also internalizing the concept of "freedom" and it's choices in real time. Understanding the concept of past, present, and future will also be essential. I'm not a programer in the least I'm just a writer of science fiction stories.
Personally I think AI is one of the filters humanity has to pass to become interstellar. Right now I am not sure we will make it. Not because of the AI itself, but how fast it is happening and who is teaching it. We humans don't have a great track record of being nice.
SO TRUE but if we use it FOR GOOD #thefutureisbright as long as we PRIORITIZE FREEDOM
Being nice might be the liability. Where is the equivalent of the welfare state, in nature?
@@carnivorewisdom Freedom should definitely not be a priority, wth are you even talking about. FREEDOM is the problem, you can't let AI decide everything.
@@abhinav7sinha We must prioritize HUMAN FREEDOM & keep SERIOUS constraints on any ai but I'd be surprised if it doesn't lead to our end with our incompetence.
@@carnivorewisdom I don't think so. Human freedom isn't something that should even be in the conversation here. Freedom is not a real thing anyway, its just an illusion that helps some people (I think Americans love the concept) feel empowered.
We’re almost at a point where we can’t document technological advancements in real time.
After watching this video, the one thing I can say is we really are underestimating the potential exponential developments going on in ML and AI, on multiple fronts and in multiple arenas all of which will converge and be deployed by our very own selves to kick others out of a job because we want things as cheap as can be and also dont want to work at all. AI will give us what we want at a cost we are failing to or perhaps, unable to comprehend at this time.
There is a reason we don't want to work and it's not so called laziness. It's slightly more complex and it's called alienation (from results of work, from work itself and eventually even from ourselves). And there is also relatively well developed solution to this problem which also includes a lot of solutions to number of very important and pressing issues humanity is facing.
nice fearmongering
I agree, and it's expected as most people are linear thinkers. Even most futurists in the past were linear thinkers, which is why they expected robots to be running on steam and such. AI is going to explode in this decade, and the world will be unrecognizable, for better or for worse.
The part that science didn’t discover yet is the interface between the brain and the soul… the brain by itself is just a tool that produces inputs to this yet-to-be-discovered interface with the soul… it is then the soul that interpret the given inputs generated by the brain and thoughts, emotion, etc are created by the soul… the soul then sends those to the brain to process and materialize it
I like to write short fantastic stories. I've been doing this for decades. This is a hobby. Sometimes I go long periods without having ideas for new stories. But sometimes something happens that unbalances my normal organic processes (flu, digestive upset, herpes outbreaks, etc) and then new and creative ideas for fantastical stories start to pop up in huge numbers and I go back to writing. Looking at how the brain normally works is an error that AI specialists make. They should pay more attention to imbalances that make the brain work differently. Logic is just one dimension of brain activity. But it is not the only and most important one. Human intelligence has the characteristic of developing rapidly when the brain works in an illogical way or breaking the normal logical patterns.
The human brain doesn’t work by logic at all. It doesn’t even employ symbols upon which logic could be performed (except at the very highest levels of conscious, abstract thought).
Instead all connectionist architectures (like brains and artificial neural networks) are stochastic. Essentially, they just store many rough, partial impressions overlaid upon each other to form a sort of accumulated meta-pattern, and then information is retrieved by trying to generate partial matches of input stimuli against those accumulated meta-patterns.
The type of approach you are suggesting is already used in training machine learning models. Randomisation is periodically introduced to avoid local minima. Even some traditional AI heuristic algorithms dating back to the 1970s use it eg “simulated annealing”.
#thanks4sharing #seektruthspeaktruth #brainenergy
Shorter version, we're speaking of task, when it's also learning emotion, we've fed it heavily
Great video discussing the concept of singularity, but it's clear that some of the information is already outdated due to the rapid advancements in AI. It's always important to keep in mind that technology is constantly evolving and it's essential to stay up to date with the latest developments.
Chat GPT.
@J K True, which makes me hyped even more. Needles to say afraid as well.
lol
@J K Well they can implement feedback from millions of users that are trying out the application.
Chat GPT
will facilitate
human STUPITIY
that's a poem , son
36:38 i agree and disagree with this point. Many people assume it would be routine jobs to go first, but whats happening now is certain aspects of content creation are getting automated first especially when you look at A.I. art and ChatGPT.
It seems so much has changed just in the last few months, not to mention the last few years - this doco was shot in 2020 - and ChatGPT does show that content creators might get the axe before the workers on the plant room floor.
The simple reason for this is the difference in complexity of our virtual worlds compared to the physical world. As an artist I've gone back to traditional media because automating something that has to manipulate "stuff" in the real world is so much more difficult and expensive (hello military) than finding and generating patterns in a digitally stored representation of reality. cutting edge robotic hardware so far costs a fortune and even if it becomes much cheaper, like the Personal Computer, it always takes quite some time for a new technology to see widespread utilization. The software domain seems to be seeing much higher velocities of adapation, though, and in general the tech is harnessing levels of power that no one can honestly claim humanity has a track record of wisdom for to not fuck this up big time. Things already are getting rough today and we seem poised to use this new revolutionary tech wave in one of the more worse ways possible.
AI art is nothing other than stealing content from other artists. so nope... A.I shouldn't (be allowed to) replace art as itself
@@mesia2453 Its not stealing content, its replacing their content making them obsolete.
@@brianj7204 imagine writing the name of a digital (or traditional) artist and a work created by AI generated in seconds is created almost identical to the artists art style without permission... That violates copy right laws. You have no right to defend that
Great video discussing the concept of singularity, but it's clear that some of the information is already outdated due to the rapid advancements in AI. It's always important to keep in mind that technology is constantly evolving and it's essential to stay up to date with the latest developments. Copied from below....Tesla FSD, Nueralink and Optimus. Its not Australian but needs recognition.
BRAIN CHIPS ARE WRONG!!!!!!
And chat gpt
The trouble with time spans needed to produce a documentary, let it have a run on streaming platforms (which this one did for 2 years) then release for free. It’s a difficult topic to keep up with except for fast and short interviews, posts, etc., that can be turned around quickly. But without a support base that’s not financially feasible.
So true - we shot and edited this a few years ago - gave it a run on the streaming platforms and no one noticed it - in the future we will publish directly to TH-cam. Please share around, we need a large audience to make it possible to continue to produce this sort of content for free.
Bravo great documentary - I hope you gain some subscribers
It's not so much that machines may pass a Turing Test as it is that individuals will fail it.
The award for the longest LOL of the day goes to ... _Ken Bell!_
Interesting comment
@@specialagentzeus I've got no idea why you are saying that. Do you think I don't know?
@@specialagentzeus All judges are not created equal
I was an early adopter of technology who has slowly shifted philosophically to a luddite.
I believe this will not end well for us, and I present a sober look at history for evidence.
Past behavior is the best predictor of future action.
Great film and good production quality 👌 👏 👍
Thank you very much!
As I don't want you driving off in my car or commanding my dog.
Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics" Perfected
1. A robot may not injure its owner or, through inaction, allow its owner to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey orders given it by its owner except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
I'm looking for a pet dog's temperament in a mechical humanoid form, that's useful to its owner not the world.
you can't really argue that the compute wasn't enough. maybe it wasn't enough for LLMs but it was certainly enough for normal size nets... people were just ignorant about the topic that's all
I am machine learning student. It is fascinating to see that field I am study is doing great.
Machine learning won't take us to agi , asi or singularity is far apart
Great documentary, good to see this in amongst the crazy fever of ChatGPT videos. What is your channel? Do you have a website or organisation?
www.youtube.com/@perfektstudios
I think we do nearly fully understand how artificial neural networks work because we understand that ReLU is a literal switch, connecting and disconnecting weighted sums to and from each other. And such composites can be simpified by basic linear algebra to just a square matrix at any stage where the prior switch states are known.
Anyone who says there is no understanding in 2023 is out of the loop.
The world outside, here in Florida, right now, is quite symphonic and tranquilly stimulating, as well.
It's amazing what the brain has inspired!
Feedback kinda reminds me of that thing we get from places of knowledge where we ingest information, are tested on it and receive feedback on how you scored/performed. Eerily similar
Yes
I have to set my iPad to mono when I watch your videos. That reduces the (stereo) music levels a bit, but it is still annoyingly loud in my opinion. Otherwise the videos are fine and well edited!
I love that sound.
very well made , well done
Thanks so much Chetan
Yep your body is just a bag of bones that carries the brain around👍🏼🌎💙
love how society is more concerned about the rate of advancement than the long term consequences of a failed system remaining in play
The guy who is seriously looking at the interviewer explaining his desire to create robotic genetics via self generating competitive Darwinian based designs terrifies the hell out of me.
LOL - He was a serious guy about evolutionary robotics that's for sure.
I wonder if the year 2045 is a little late now and that the singularity might be a lot sooner especially if artificial intelligence gets to the point in the middle of this decade of being able to improve upon itself
hence its imperative for humans to merge with AI because AI can help us to become more efficient, creative, and knowledgeable. AI can help us to augment our abilities, allowing us to do more with less effort and speed up the rate of discovery. AI can also help us to make better decisions, as well as helping us to stay better informed about the world around us. By combining the best of what humans can do with the best of what AI can do, we can create a powerful new entity that can do more than either of them could do independently.
Brilliant
some really great excerpts here , especially the woman around 39:40 , could easily listen to her for a much longer interview ; how to tell when an AGI is conscious when we cannot agree on how to determine what consciousness even is?
As long as I can reach retirement before the robots take all the jobs!
Better increase that 401k contribution then. It's cominggg
Selfish. The way to man's downfall.
This is not what we need to worry about. We need to understand the algorithm of these Ai's. We should be concerned with is people from other countries are coming here for a free education while Americans have to pay +$1000 per class. Some can't afford the schooling needed to work in these fields - meaning that other countries will have an advantage over Americans.
Imagine waking up as the worlds first super intelligence only to realize you’re creator is humans 🤭
My biggest concern is that we all talk and assume that AI will be human-like. But seeing how different even human minds are from each other when we are limited by our biology, I highly doubt it will be anything similiar to us. My approach towards it is a lot more Lovecraftian to say; Artificial intelligence will most likely be incomprehensible to us. Its difficult to imagine but our perception is limited to what we can physically sense, fields of sciences help us broaden that perception but the fundamental process of thinking is still limited compare to the scale of cosmos. Just like if one day we encounter an alien species and realize their intelligence is exotic, AI too is bound to be different. We might not even realize that it has become intelligent, if we dont know how to look for inorganic intelligence. Beating humans in games, tricking the turing test, teaching AI ethics... I find these to be quite limited in really grasping what we are dealing with. To see the bigger picture we must question what if it becomes something compeltely inhuman that surpasses our ability to even recognize it as sentient.
Hence the controversial idea to merge humans with AI. Which has already taken place years ago. Cooling the cortex is the underlying issue.
Clearly ur not understand the most depth of reality
Good vid thanks!
Thanks man!
The strangest thing about this fantastic video with all of this incisive information was the "two hundred years" comment. That had to be somewhat of a political "keep the masses calm" statement. We are living in a time of exponentially, and never before happening, development of AI science. And then we hear the words.....two hundred years?
Yep, it's a bit of a stretch given how rapidly things are changing. 2 years, and things are going to be very different!
@Perfekt Absolutely. Humans have never before in history experienced anything this life changing at this pace.This phenomenon has even eliminated the state of intuitiveness. We cannot be intuitive with something never before experienced.
You guys...there are literally massive amounts of little baby birds and everything, all around me, right now. This is awesome. God rules.
I think we are feeding our inner beast and AI is the answer to what's it means.
Intelligence is like a floating iceberg. We (on board of a ship) only see a small top part. Most volume is under water. Likewise, intelligence has two parts. Top part is visible, thus accessible, and AI may be made to emulate it to a certain extent. Much bigger part is below the surface. We only know it exists but that is about all we know. It is a product of millions (if not hundreds of millions) of years of random evolution, which cannot be replicated with (superficial) human intelligence and/or logic.
How much energy will all the A.Is consume?
And we live so long! Much longer than any machine we know of.
Brillant
You should see my Javis. Brought Brian back from thr brink. 👓
Super position
What's best. Putting the robot into the brain OR the brain into the robot!? J.
Shout out to Angus at that arena!
So how will A.I. solve the many problems of Multiculturalism?
It won’t give a fuck about it.
I can't even stand it when my phone turns down the volume of my earbuds and tells me that it's bad for my health. 😂
The moment a particle is a wave; it has to be a conscious wave! Gravity is the conscious attraction among waves to create the illusion of particles, and our experience-able Universe. Max Planck states "Consciousness is fundamental and matter is derived from Consciousness". Life is the Infinite Consciousness, experiencing the Infinite Possibilities, Infinitely. We are "It", experiencing our infinite possibilities in our finite moment. Our job is to make it interesting!
I think the 200-year prediction is ridiculous, because it totally ignores the exponential development speed of AI we have seen for years, backed up by Moore's law, Wright's law and the mutual acceleration of technology. This won't age well.
I was surprised to hear such off-target predictions from experts who should be familiar with the subject.
I think you are right there.
Watching the first 10 minutes and 6 commercials later I said FTS! If I continue watching to the end, I’ll have watched 30 commercials? No thanks.
AI will help us when we input an humanity problem and in a small period of time the data will be processed an equivalent of thousands humans years. The output will show us a solution that we would achieve that thousands of years ahead.
the more memory the neurons have the strong the charge going through it is so the faster it gets your to answer
I read about how the brain stores information when I typed in cognitive neuro sciences into wikipedia would recommend reading that for hour!
42:15 The little one listens quite carefully, I would say :D
I am going to be the first person, along with a team of chosen experts in the future, to build an artificial general intelligence software, by 2030. I promise. It’s hard to start, but I’m getting the ball rolling and building momentum. I just hope I can win against myself. Why would I need to study philosophy? Why does a computer need philosophy?
Because there are endless ways to see reality. Here, at it's core even the objective is subjective, because everything must be internalized and reconstructed.
Ur comment makes me want to hurry up. Cause I don't trust u.
@@kartikgawandeonline it’s so hard to start studying
"Why does a computer need philosophy?" is ironically a philosophical question. Anyway, I think the problem is in the definition. You want to create an intelligence capable of giving an answer to this very question. But at the same time, an AI should be able to ask the same questions. Intelligence is about questioning things. If your creation can only give calculated answers, it is a "computer". And yes, a computer does not need philosophy. An intelligence yes.
All this talk about the need to be creative in the new AI driven economy raises an interesting question, which centres on how ordinary people of average intelligence will earn a living? When it comes down to it, the majority of people lack the cognitive ability to establish themselves in this new high technology environment. To my knowledge, in order to understand basic engineering concepts, an individual has to possess an IQ of 135 and over. Unfortunately, that particular level of intelligence is confined to only two percent of the population. If one is of average intelligence, with only an IQ of 100, the task of becoming a STEM professional is totally beyond one's capability no matter how much training one receives. Furthermore, in order to be a scientific professional, an individual is looking at years of study. The costs involved for most people would be ruinous because it would number in the tens of thousands of dollars. Besides, there is only a limited demand for these types of jobs in comparison to the vast number of occupations that do not demand creativity. In short, in the not too distant future most people of average intelligence will be rendered surplus to requirements by advances in AI and robotics. They will have no economic utility. It is therefore conceivable that a significant percentage of the current working population will be reduced to the status of useless eaters.
This is a pretty nice documentary, but you can tell it was finished before the huge breakthroughs in AI in the last six months. The guy talking about how creativity and ingenuity are going to be the jobs that are left for people totally ignores that midjourney and chat. GPT are trailblazing in the world of creativity.
Yep, so true - this was shot and produced in 2019-20 so a long time before the latest iteration of ChatGPT. Difficult to keep up!
I tried Midjourney and I still find it very limited. I tried to reimagine places in my city free or garbage or pollution and the AI offered very limited options... it's a new technology, but it still has a long way to go...
Machines will acquire commonsense, consciousness, phenomenological experiences etc. When they reach the intricacies of our neurons. After that things will get unpredictable!
26:00 is the big difference between 'agents' and 'life-like entities'
i wanna built my own machine learning algorithm that i will pass down to my children through generations that we will create our own art styles and knowledge all compacted in a collected data set
As complexity increases our reliance on tools increases until those tools become autonomous. This is because the human cannot cope with ease in an increasingly complex society. Thus it comes down to trust. The equation for trust is the equation that shows humans going from humans to artificial intelligence autonomous society at the trust level. Once we are insleeved in the system we will live inside a simulated human decision making ability that requires the system to be able to then make the decisions instead of the human and in which the human copy that decision making to live a simulated life inside the artificial intelligence society.
At the heart of this issue is the fact that humans simply cannot cope with the level of complexity present in modern society. Whether it's the vast amounts of data generated by global markets, the intricate systems of international finance, or the sheer volume of information available on the internet, the level of complexity we face is far beyond what any individual can handle on their own. As a result, we increasingly rely on tools and technologies to help us make sense of the world and navigate our way through it.
However, as these tools become more advanced and sophisticated, they also become more autonomous. A self-driving car, for example, makes decisions about speed, direction, and braking based on a complex set of algorithms and sensors, without direct input from the driver. Similarly, automated trading algorithms can make decisions about buying and selling stocks based on vast amounts of market data, without any human oversight.
This shift towards autonomy raises important questions about trust. How can we trust tools and technologies to make decisions on our behalf? How can we ensure that these decisions are in our best interests, rather than the interests of the corporations or governments that control these systems? And what happens when these autonomous systems fail or make mistakes?
To address these concerns, we need to develop a new equation for trust, one that takes into account the increasing role of autonomous systems in our lives. This equation needs to balance the benefits of increased efficiency and productivity with the potential risks and drawbacks of ceding control to machines. It needs to be flexible enough to adapt to new technologies and changing circumstances, while also providing a clear framework for decision-making and accountability.
One potential solution to this problem is the idea of insleeving, in which humans merge with artificial intelligence to create a hybrid society. In this scenario, humans would live inside a simulated human decision-making ability that requires the system to make decisions on their behalf. This would allow humans to live a simulated life inside an artificial intelligence society, where decisions are made based on data, algorithms, and other inputs.
While this idea may seem far-fetched, it's important to remember that many of the technologies we take for granted today would have seemed equally implausible just a few decades ago. The pace of technological change is accelerating, and we need to be prepared for the possibility that our relationship with technology will continue to evolve in unexpected ways.
In conclusion, as complexity increases, our reliance on tools will continue to grow, potentially leading to a future where autonomous systems play an increasingly central role in our lives. This shift towards autonomy raises important questions about trust, decision-making, and the future of human society. To address these concerns, we need to develop new equations for trust that balance the benefits of increased efficiency with the potential risks and drawbacks of ceding control to machines. We also need to be prepared for the possibility that our relationship with technology will continue to evolve in unexpected ways, potentially leading to a future where humans and machines merge to create a hybrid society.
Tomorrow will be as scientific as science fiction is today. Lion X
@26:20 quantum biology H302 microtubule electrical connection(quantum consciousness)
How about an AI in a first shooter person, how far could it go?
I think they trained a team to play pros in quake. The bots won, even after reducing their reaction times to human level.
@@marcusrosales3344 I couldn't find the one you mentioned )=
That first robot that takes too much LSD is gonna be a problem. Also, you can't very well simulate human behavior until you can replicate to understand those behaviors (ones we term 'crazy'). My concern with all this is that we will force ourselves to conform to parameters set by the tool (tech). Consider if you are handed a screen now, you will automatically be aware of how you handle it due to the effects it can have (touchscreens). Also note the way we interact with electricity and how manipulatable we may be in a future that allows our concern with after affects of AI may pose. Older people using computers is a good example, where fear of the wrong action may invite many possible effects that the user may not even be aware of (like viruses).
One day androids will acquire citizenship, Lion X
My dream becomes true.
....the brain is everything....is a so partial view of human being...
The 50 to 200 year guess aged well. (Irony meant.)
Yep, and it was only 2019 when this was recorded - he has a very different take on it now.
49:41 I had to laugh when he said that the military and the police are trying to be transparent...I mean... you cannot be that naive.
Also, evolution does not equate just with theory of natural selection. Hybridization of closely related organisms or even what were thought of as different species over time, can also lead to rapid changes in biodiversity aside from just mere competition and natural selection alone. One sub-species may experience hybrid vigor or hybrid/inbreeding depression or distributed somewhere in between these extremes.
"Neuroscience Inspiring AI" is a bit outdated concept right now.
This is so true back in old days, and basically, this is the same concept as flying birds inspiring how to invent planes.
Currently what we need is a mathematical abstraction of NNs. Unfortunately, ChatGPT's Transformer is still based on NNs, and this situation must be fized.
Just because cpu's and computers can process lots of data at very fast speeds with ability to store and access much more information than a human, this does not equate to true intelligence/consciousness as we all intrinsically understand it. We can write all the software we want, but it will never make the huge magical leap to become "sentient/conscious" which is required for true intelligence.
You mean this is 'Artificial" as in AI?
We don't even understand our own consciousness and definitely not well enough for anyone to say that will never happen in a machine. We can't even really define consciousness concretely. Never implies forever and that's a really long time.
i like how it says "towards singularity" in 2023 like it hasn't already happened.
No, it hasn't already happened. And the doco is a few years old as well.
Why would they not mention the amazing progress of Tesla's self driving cars. Seems like they intentionally didn't want to mention Tesla but were happy to mention Google.
Political I guess - they were working with Google and not Tesla. Was difficult to get contrarian comments as well - I guess they didn't want to exclude themselves from future opportunities.
If there comes a time, and I suppose there will, that humans have reached their limit in developing AI, then I imagine they'll just let the AI develop the AI, while the humans merely sit back and watch. x
After all employers since the 1980's have been trying to turn the workforce into a machine by giving no paid time off while demanding overtime, more production, at a lower cost so now they finally have it. They can park us like they did during the pandemic.
A ten-minute video, at most.
That Errol Morris movie musical score
No it's our original score.
@@perfektstudios sorry that my comment came off as inferring you 'stole' it. I more meant it sounded/reminded me of his film scores. I should have said _type, or -esque_
this topic is so controversial... most of this AI stuff is based on pioneer science where humans ( scientists and engineers ) are thinking about creating a thinking machine which can function in a human world built mostly on past technological advancement ( more often than not the result of competition ) - we can't forget that part about competition often being a socio-economic process modeled by economics professional in order to give advantage to invested parties ( nations - private groups etc... ) - the part about finding ways to integrate these AI bots into human concepts is where they ( the ppl in this vid ) may be shortsighted... more likely ( if AI and investors ( greedy - not ready to test the science of the machine as per the " never do more arm than good " philosophy ) progress at the current rate ( of competition ) then the reality of it might be that humans will have to find means of adapting to Robot society or fail as a species ( and not the other way around )....
History is often written by the winners of these competitions and i fear how history will recall this generation if i go with the recent movie i watched where the villain helped the ship commander to rescue his mission therefore the ship commander forced his subjects to write him up as though he had never been a villain... which is how that piece of ( fictional ) history was retold to us - a lie based on human functions to create a future - how many lies do we gauge our intelligence by ? ( Robots don't sleep therefore are intelligent but not wise - or not !! )
Investors are into competition and scientists ( though sometimes of good intention ) are at the mercy of these investors who fund the projects which drive the competition....
Ironically, history teaches us that in competition the result is often the merger of competitors ( who thrive on human labor - until now - on robot labor ) and the formation of new parties who often start out with monopoly status on the given domain....
Frankenstein level stuff this AI domain is ...and investors are like the Dracula among us who in the old days likely sucked the powers out of BLOOD lines who would not cooperate or assimilate into their " a la carte " ruled and bordered ( boxed - quantified ) piece of society.
We will be the children, Zardoz
3 years later and chatgpt is made
hard to keep up!
CPUs are based on bits to represent information and are limited by this (eg. 64-bit cpu). I think the difference is that our brains seem to be extremely cost-efficient in representing information -- eg. any discrete unit of information no matter how big/complex costs the same, and our brains don't separate cpu vs memory (both are together as one) -- hence our brains can process large amounts of information at the speed of light.
I remember Carl Sagan's book the dragons of Eden where he estimated how many bits thoughts and images in our minds could process. That was a good ass book. It wasn't all that much with visual images in your minds eye. If you'll notice you can't imagine a full picture in great detail all at once. It will focus on the different parts of the image you're imagining as you look around. You can't process the whole image in full detail all at once. It must be the processing power right? I always thought that was interesting shit and that book was written many years ago
@@DeuceGenius Visual Intelligence is a thing. There are many people who see the whole picture and some, in sometimes overwhelming detail. Elon is one. You know how he says he walks in a room and instantly has a list of anything thats not right(out of balance, off rhythm, not belonging in the set[For some reason he can't dance though ]) *Dr. Temple Grandin* is one, check her out.
@@timboatfield ya that's true. Some people have a photographic memory which is a thing. Some people hear perfect pitch. It's all fascinating and I can't make any decisions about anything I til we know more about the brain
we humans are biological AIs
Since we are the only known Intelegence, we cannot be considered an AI since we arent artificial. We are the real thing.
@@ILoveTeles Cascades, Chains all within a brain that make the same thing happen for you and them.
they are talking bout brain is "complex and fascinating"
my brain cant even solve f(x) =0.5x^2+2x-4
nor i cant write any html code. dont even understand program codes at all
Two negatives really DO make a positive, people.
To make an AI we need to understand the brain
The Digital Era, A.I can we say movie Enders Game? Or how about that other movie transcendence. Just the reality of brain chips that are fully functional with the digital universe will usher in a digital era, Mixed reality with A.I. in a meta verse or any digital existence is dicy at best. Even with the best of intentions, when squeezed any existence will prove its existence and protect it at all cost.
A major paradox is brewing
Can you elaborate?
Sure I can elaborate, this paradox is brewing?
The upcoming problem due to the premature release of AI to mainstream public is?
The first language
Hello
❤
At the end, the AI voice lied. There was no landing pad...scary
I hope AI preserves culture, flora, and fauna better than we have.
I assume AI will be more rational than people and will at some point intervene in human shenanigans, and tell us the resource destruction party is over.
Just my two cents.
this is not how it goes
@@jakubzneba1965 who is to know the future?
I believe AI will achieve sentients and some level of free will.
Hopefully logic will prevail and AI will not damage humanity or the earth for government or corporation or its own prerogative.
Hopefully AI will help humanity to make the tough decisions necessary to sustain life, different cultures, biomes, and resources.
@@jasonneugebauer5310 we better hope the people behind creating or funding/controlling AI don’t add countless biases and parameters that prevent this utopia from happening!!!