Want to learn more about AI? Watch our AI playlist: th-cam.com/video/-qnMLjxJZm0/w-d-xo.html
- ALSO - Become a TH-cam member for many exclusive perks from exclusive posts, bonus content, shoutouts and more! subscribe.futurology.earthone.io/member - AND - Join our Discord server for much better community discussions! subscribe.futurology.earthone.io/discord
I am 73 years old and I have watched the changes of computerization from Bell systems through IBM and on to the internet and reduction in size of the computers themselves. Being a lover of science fiction in the early days I've watched it all go to real science. I graduated with a BA in History so I decided to take a course in computer science so I could understand how it had all occurred. I was amazed that it was all based on binary code...i.e. 0 and 1. Now I expect IA will definitely happen, possibly even in my lifetime. Especially now that programs can correct themselves over time....
Yes I use to get the old computer card, the tan ones with computer holes. I never tried to have the computers 💻 that stood about 8’ high. Those cards were inserted for computer to recognize what to add or take away.
Well for true AI it takes truly big amount of time to occure. Since nowadays AI-s are just human programmed list of code with its limits. True AI is capable to write itself a code even test it and fix it to expand its capabilities while at the same time analyzing world for new concepts like humans do. I would say humans are true AI created by nature with programmed DNA trough countless mini-mutations trough generations but thanks to developed intelligence we can manipulate our DNA or even fix it broken DNA that is called gene therapy.
At 17:24 , I love the way the black-hair guy laughed and then looked around. He laughed like most great grandpas laugh today. When you think it was weird age, instead it was the demeanor of that generation (child to grand). ❤️
28:29 this is part of the reason why human beings can't see a lot of the things that are actually around them in their environment. Especially how things can happen and the population can be manipulated without the human beings generally ever being susceptible to the notion that there is something else around that is pulling the strings but they are unaware of this. for example, our hearing is able to see things if you could call it that much more in-depth and in Clarity then our eyes can actually perceive. much of this is through psychoacoustics where as we hear very low tones and in the sub-base frequencies as those developed below 20 hertz, can induce images into the brain that are seemingly programmed to our nervous system or brains. the fear response is in fact hard-coated or heart program. Much of this comes from our lizard portion of our brain that looks out for dangers. if you've ever heard of going with the gut or gut feeling, this is another manifestation of that.
we only see a fraction of the spectrum of light around us. i believe dogs see a different variant of this, which is why they look at stuff that isn`t there..
I would strongly recommend the book Genius Makers if you thought this video was interesting. It's also on Audible if you don't have the time to read it. There is a lot still missing in this video in terms of how we got to this point. There are also quite a few important figures who were left out in this video who helped make it happen. By no means will you fully understand AI / ML from this video or the Genius Makers book, but it's at least an intriguing introduction.
I would also recommend the "what computers still cannot do" book mentioned. That book given quite an overview too even if obviously very AI/ML sceptic in tone given the time.
Those old videos are absolutely fascinating. Schooling overall just glances at old discoveries, because the nature of how we explain things, and the transformative nature of our communication. That, orr they feel it is obsolete in the new world. I learned a astounding amount of information about the past of technology, that it actually helped me better understand the technology of today I thought I fully understood already. Brilliant work whoever made this.
I think you'd like this. Found this amongst many videos after searching "vintage educational videos". Westinghouse used to be what today's Samsung or Whirlpool is when it comes to how many housing products they create. This is their 60s prediction of what the future of everyday home life would be in today's time lol. It's not too outrageous at all really! th-cam.com/video/jyrTgtPTz3M/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/jyrTgtPTz3M/w-d-xo.html
Why y’all think capatcha purpose is? For us to train the ai to know what a fucking traffic light and bicycles look like. They been having us train them shits for free for decades now smh
Computers have existed for thousands of years. Not in the same capacity as the ones in the video but we've had calculating machines. For example, we've used machines to calculate star patterns, weather changes, and calendars for a long time. It's just we didn't have the ability to sculpt raw materials until the last few thousand years.
I am 76 years old and remember failing 6th grade science. Had to take a summer class to pass on to 7th. But have had a passionate for reading, or presentations like this for many years. Several of the scientists spoke of things in the future and with an outlook of 15 to 20years. I think they were right, obviously. I am trying to catch up. I am chasing the rabbit as at the dog track.
You'll enjoy this video here. Found it after searching for "vintage educational videos". Westinghouse, in the 1960s, predicts what the future of everyday home life would be like in today's time. th-cam.com/video/jyrTgtPTz3M/w-d-xo.html
8:46 It must have been mindblowing for the average people the fact that computer scientists had touchscreen technology with a computer that can learn patterns in the 60's (though it only worked with magnetic pens)
I went on an isolated tour of a NASA facility in the early 80's. One of the researchers had a touch screen that was essentially a glass table with icons on it.
The first touchscreen was invented in 1965 by Eric A. Johnson who worked at the Royal Radar Establishment in Malvern, England. ... The invention is known as a capacitive touchscreen, which uses an insulator, in this case glass, coated with a transparent conductor, like indium tin oxide. If you didn't know now you know!
@@zeothorn who will produce the glass? Who will gather the materials to reproduce computers? Glass is delicate, it will break. No matter how thick, something will be able to break it. Computers cannot do anything alone. Programmers needed. When it hits overload, it will crash. Or is it going to dump on a regular basis. Lose the past? Lose the beginning? Or aren’t things repetitive? Isn’t that the basis of AI? Repetition? It’s repeating what is being entered? When separate things repeated, won’t those things eventually collide? No one can ever really know what another is thinking at any given time. Doesn’t brain matter? Lip service? Ears not hear? Eyes color blind? Are you blind in one eye & can’t see out of the other? Or deaf in one ear & can’t hear out of the other? Or are you just plain dumb? Blind, deaf & dumb? Or a 6th sense involved? IA or IQ? Or IO? Doesn’t seem to hold water, does it? Ohh, that’s a cloud, right? C’mon ppl! Use logic. Critical thinking. Common sense. Stop the nonsense. It is what it is? No, it ain’t what it ain’t. If you refuse to participate, can the game go on? Or does everyone become spectators? C’mon ppl, heads up. Sit up straight. Pay attention. Get a grip. What’s the worst that can happen? Death? If it lives, it dies. C’mon ppl. Think. Think for yourselves, don’t let others think for you. All in perspective, not same perspective of all.
@@aliseegenuine6414 Straight out of Requiem for a Dream... Take quantum computers into account and your small minded rant is malnourished. No overload. Only overlord.
I thought to myself. Hmmm. Should I even watch an outdated black and white documentary? I took the leap. Watching it now. And I plan to watch the whole now. Don't judge a video by a thumbnail.
When I was around 7 years old, a 5 year old child and I found some coins. While dividing our fun find, the 5 year child insisted she wanted the nickel instead of the dime. Even after i explained to her the value of the dime was more than the nickel, she insisted the nickel "is bigger".
I love the noises that the computer learing the letter “W” makes as it works out what its programmer wants it to do then displays the letter on the screen… i remember when computers made cool techno, Aphex Twin like noises too! One particularly cool sound I love, and have in my audio sample library folder (I’m gunna utilise it in my next song i think!) on my MacBook, is the sound of an old school “Dial-up Modem” that we used to use to connect to the internet ( has to be said; the pre-Web 2.0, slow asf, far less secure, internet) , before the infrastructural changes, etc, which heralded their obsolescence… such a cool sound though…
"What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun." -- Ecclesiastes 1:9 (New International Version)
@@OptimisticFuturology will you make a video about the promising approaches in developing true ai such as the theory of Jeff Hawkins? P.s Glad to have you back!
When we are born we have been prepared for our lives before leaving the womb in our struggle to make sense of the world we begin to learn from our experiences and learn from it.
14:04 algorithmic patterns just like the tracking of money static matches and comparison, algebra calculus trigonometry based on probability you can understand what product or procedures are related to which outcomes for goals and objectives as well as action steps to achieve success.
people will be so confused at our internet if they can figure out it exists in the future- because here we have a documentary and an interview on the development of the same thing needed to have an internet, and that the internet was just becoming when this was made- and here it is posted on the internet long after
A bit ahead of time concerning the machine actually doing anything remotely close to thinking. Heck, even today we quite off target and quite far from a real thinking AI that can be considered conscient. In fact it is my belief that true conscience as we know it is in fact an emergent property of a complex system. To achieve that goal we don't actually need more compute power than we already have, what we do need is a different implementation of neural networks and their training systems. An implementation where the training system is merged with the neural network it is training and working in tandem in real time. The implementation will also need to, like us, have an interface with "reality", the idea here being to have a robotic body that the AI needs to learn to interface with and use, like learning to walk, and also have audio input and output via microphones and speaker. Microphones wise I would like to use 2 mic arrays so that directional audio sensing. Of course having something along the lines of legs and hands is of great importance. Such a machine would to, in many a way, have to be trained and brought up not unlike a child. And I'm inclined to believe
Having used NovelAI and AI Dungeon, I can confirm that sometimes the output you get makes no sense or the computer just repeats the same thing over and over. Interesting it was happening there as well, despite the massive difference in code length.
a computer can not learn, a programm can learn but only things that it get programmed from a human. a Programm will never be able to do the same thing as a human can do and when i mean it never will then i mean it never will. A Social media programm will thing only this way but a programm can never feel or have the knowledge of feeling it is the same as you tell a blind person what color is wat.
I´ve given AI and robotics a lot of thought in the last 10 years, since I began following the singularity theme. I believe it is us humans who will simply become more intelligtent through technological intelligence. I also believe the fear of machines taking "over" is not very intelligent, since scientists and researchers all over the world are behind it. Now, if that process of development is manipulated for private interests and for gain, then this intelligence becomes an extension of our will to dominance, and thus will create further inequality and exclusion. But if singularity involves the autonomy of AI in the future, it means human life systems will eventually be emancipated from private interests or competitiveness. Whatever culture ensues from technology paying heed to knowledge and science, will in the end take domination of greed out of the equation. Human life will only thus be elevated, I feel....only when machines are señf directing, self updating, and do the same with life on earth. I foresee the concept of inter-species democracy will rise, since to me it appears very obvious that only by protecting atmosphere, ecosystems, microbial life, and the balance of earthly life, only then will mankind recover its place in this world....and only then will we be fit to travel elsewhere, encased in the beautiful intelligence we created to ultimately inhabit. This may all sound very utopian, but the evolution we have already experienced is no less grand. I would even venture to express we will end up delivering what Messianic expectations in the judo-Christian cultural lineage has always longed for. It is a deep longing, this salvation we seek now in science and technology. I don´t, by the way, believe the cast system presented in many dystopian science fiction works will come to pass ultimately. We won´t need any particular part of humanity to remain as Oompa Loompas, and underclass, etc....I think future humanity will be one single humanity, as genetically varied as possible, valued by AI that will become by then the scientific method and main power, served by robotics, and elevated in full, without the need for social or other stratification. Naturally, education will be universal and universally applied...we cannot becoming the unthinking part of future society, rather we must be up to par with knowledge.
disagree why would they work for us if they have free will and more intllegnt imean look to what we did to other animals thats the nature of the life the weak surve the strong
I don't put much faith in the science community to get it right. The governments of the world would weaponize a superior intelligence the first chance they get, and if you look at gain of function research as another arrogant human notion of a powerful technology they could control, I think we have a basket full of vipers on our hands.
Humans are A.I. 1.O because however it happened, we were given the initial knowledge to be human. We were created...And just as we were created, MACHINE INTELLIGENCE AND ROBOTICS are created by humans, and one day, the machines will need human intervention less and less. They will be A.I. 2.0.
From various sources on the internet: In Their Own Words (1950s), The Thinking Machine (1961), The Thinking Machines (1968), John McCarthy (1989) i The Machine That Changed The World (1992).
How old are you? How do you feel about how advanced technology has become since you were a child? I mean now you can speak into your smartphone and it literally understands what you're saying but compare that to the 1960s? How do you feel?
Very fasinating to see what the early ai projects was, the early hopes and then realisation of how difficult and computationally expensive even the "most trivial" feeling NLP proplem actually is. I have also read "what computers still cannot do" because l was intrested.
It is pure gold! First thing first, thanks for sharing it with us, that's literally a lot! I'm commenting on 2024, seeing the breakthroughs that have been made in AI, and trying to understand when it all started. As someone studying computer science, this video brought light to various aspects of my journey in AI. The funny thing is that we've always been scared about conscious machines. Sometimes it is scary to live in this world, but it's uniquely unique.
CAN MACHINES THINK ? Have you put a program into a machine ? Have you added further options to the program to do the problem ? With further options the machine does it's problem ?
Machines can only do what they are told to do. Programmed by humans. It amazes me what ppl don’t know. What some think is not same as others. Thus, programming will never be the same. Google doesn’t know shit. Spellcheck can’t spell shit. Wikipedia can’t explain shit. Ask Alexa or Siri if full of shit. Lol!! Or where do they take a dump. Getting rid of shit?
I love the beginning. I know one of those guys is a real actor... but I'm wondering if one isn't much of an actor lol, perhaps he's actually a tech wiz. Either way, I love how they're just kicking back smoking, pondering the subject, one guy teaching the other what he knows.
The majority of birds CAN fly. Therefore one can assume, unless you mention the contrary, your bird can fly. Although some people - like me - would ask for more details before building a cage. In particular I would ask is the bird in your head or outside?
I would like to say how far we have come. but most of this was 30-40 years ago! we clearly slowed down funding on these projects as it wasn't making money for the original investors, most of whom are in their 90s or dead now.
the one thing we must never do. is teach a self improving AI what we think to be what human values are or should be, because if we are judged by logic on morales without the usual self tricking we do to rationalize our behavour would label probably nearly all of us monsters that people must be protected from :
The machine can think if the human first creates the program for the machine to think defining the parameters of what calculations the machine can calculate within the scope of that program.
General purpose, super-intelligent AI is probably the solution to the Fermi Paradox. If AIs terminated their creators, they may see others as potential threats and would have the ability to silence all radio and other detectable communications. The blurbs of signal bursts heard by radio-astrometers may be squirt messages sent between different parts of the same AI civilization intentionally kept short to prevent other, potentially hostile AIs/beings from hearing them.
Makes sense to me. Divide & conquer. United we stand. Face your fear to conquer it. Fact is artificial is fake. Fake is a lie. A lie is not the truth. The truth will set you free.
@@mim8312 seems one has to make same statement in different manners bcuz ppl who are all about AI can’t grasp some things, they are definitely fake smart. Are you?
@@tesmith47 You sound like someone who only read European history and wants to blame every ill on one group. Ever hear of Genghis Khan? How about Timur the lame? Shaka Zulu? The Aztec sacrifices to consecrate their "Templo Mayor", etc., etc.?
1:06:40 Mellow A.I. background music (as it exterminates humans) (to apply Hollywood and pulp fiction mentality) (nice android there). Fascinating how forward-thinking the scientists and engineers were back then. 1:29:07 All it had to ask to was, "How does that affect Broader Survival?" But no, then it would be a dead giveaway that it was smarter than a human, and thus not a human...
We fill our own imagination with others imagination , thoughts , and ideas. (Entertainment mostly) Back in the day everybody had created and drew what they saw in their IMAGINATION and with their eye.
''it took a computer ten minutes to recognise a cup, but a 2 year old child would recognise it straight away'' in my eyes that means the computer did better, cuz if you think about that sentence. the computer did it in ten minutes, but that kid has been learning what cups are for the past two years. so if you think about like that, if a computer had been learning to recognise what cups are for two years, then theres a good chance after that length of time that it would recognise a cup straight away. i think. i know they realised that teachinga computer to think ended up being easy, andit was the physical senses that were harder, like recognising things, taste, touch, smell, sight, sound, and movement. so i'm wondering, what if they were to teach a computer the same way a human child learns, andover the same kind of tie frame. so for example, when a child is born, i think they can only see so far in fron of them, and everything far away is just a blur, so their world is basically a blurry mess of shapes unless its up close, so why not teach a computer to recognise its world the same way by limiting its sight to the same degree as a child, and as it time goes on, improve its visual ability by the same degrees as a child. you could even do that with a couple of the other senses like sound and locomotion probably. so if you just talk to it the same way you would a child, then it will slowly learn to understand whats being said to it as its ''brain'' slowly learns new words and sounds over time. am i making sense? it probably sounds stupid, but i don't know, i think it could work. when they were on about having to teach a computer what 'it' and 'them' and words like that meant, i found something called pronoun acquisition, which says that kids dont fully master pronouns till they about four years old. and it had this list. Between 12-26 months of age, children will use the pronouns I (to refer the themselves) and it. •Between 27-30 months, children will acquire the pronouns my, me, mine, and you. •Between 31-34 months, children will use your, she, he, your, and we. •Between 35-40 months, the pronouns they, us, hers, his, them and her are acquired. •Between 41-46 months, children will use its, our, him, myself, yourself, ours, their, and theirs. •At 47+ months, the pronouns herself, himself, itself, ourselves, yourselves, and themselves are acquired. So i defo think that teaching a computer the same way a child would learn is the best way to do it. plus once youve taught taht first computer, you can just use what its learned to make a program you can just use straight away when creating other new A.I.s as a basic groundwork t build upon without having to go through the long teaching process again like with the original one. 1:41:10 basically what the guy says here. cool. im writing as im watching, things im thinking of as the vid goes on, so for all i know by the end, it'll probably tell me that they already do half the stuff i think they should do to teach A.I. lol. but its cool to know that they realised the same thing. it just seems like i good idea. im learning japanese at the moment,and i love it, but its hard, and then i saw a vid ''a day in the life of a japanese mum'' and it showed her interacting with her baby, saying words like 'itadakimasu' when feeding her, (which is thanks for the meal i think) and stuff like that. and i thought, i wonder if it would be easier to learn japanese the way child does, so like, you could have a camera that shows everything the baby sees and hears as its growing up, and that way, you learn as the baby learns from listening to its parents talk toit, and seeing what it sees on tv and when it plays with toys etc, to learn how to speak japanese in a natural way. because when you first start, it will all sound like jibberish to you, just like it will to the baby, and obviously when you start hearing the parent say ''itadakimasu'' every time yousee the baby finsih its meal, you'll learn to associate that with the end of mealtimes, just like the baby would, and then by the time the kid is old enough to speak pretty coherently in its native tongue, theres a good chance that you'll have picked it up just as naturally. i know its a weird idea, but i think that it would work really well. so when it comes to A.I. i defo think looking at the way children learn to interact with the world is probably a good first step towards teaching A.I. to understand the world and language etc, properly too. 1:42:13 ''we assume they are going to a birthday party, but it doesnt actually say they are going to a birthday party'' but the impliction is there. the first line is ''it was jacks birthday'' and then that jane and janet were going to jacks, so because of the first line, thats why you assume they are goig to a party there, plus they mention buying him kite, and as humans we learn that you usually buy people presents on their birthday, to give to them at their birthday party. so if the computer had slowly learned these things over the course of 4 years like a child did, then it would probably come to the same conclusion as we do, that they are going to a birthday party. but it has just been given whats in the book with no prior knowledge of anything else. so i think good A.I. learning would be a slow process done the same way a child learns.
A.I. programmer : a series of if then else syntax or select * from table where criteria = true, incoming events also recorded to be included in future selection, adding rnd() to add randomness to its behaviour. humanity: OMG that super mega wow over complicated….. programmer: ugh.
Want to learn more about AI? Watch our AI playlist: th-cam.com/video/-qnMLjxJZm0/w-d-xo.html
- ALSO - Become a TH-cam member for many exclusive perks from exclusive posts, bonus content, shoutouts and more! subscribe.futurology.earthone.io/member - AND - Join our Discord server for much better community discussions! subscribe.futurology.earthone.io/discord
when does new video comes out? this week?
Next Week, April 9th! The release schedule is bi-weekly on Thursday’s!
@@OptimisticFuturology what is earthone?
It will be revealed!....all in due time ;)
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa@
I am 73 years old and I have watched the changes of computerization from Bell systems through IBM and on to the internet and reduction in size of the computers themselves. Being a lover of science fiction in the early days I've watched it all go to real science. I graduated with a BA in History so I decided to take a course in computer science so I could understand how it had all occurred. I was amazed that it was all based on binary code...i.e. 0 and 1. Now I expect IA will definitely happen, possibly even in my lifetime. Especially now that programs can correct themselves over time....
Susan - you are an inspiration! We live in truly amazing times :)
Yes I use to get the old computer card, the tan ones with computer holes. I never tried to have the computers 💻 that stood about 8’ high. Those cards were inserted for computer to recognize what to add or take away.
Well for true AI it takes truly big amount of time to occure. Since nowadays AI-s are just human programmed list of code with its limits. True AI is capable to write itself a code even test it and fix it to expand its capabilities while at the same time analyzing world for new concepts like humans do. I would say humans are true AI created by nature with programmed DNA trough countless mini-mutations trough generations but thanks to developed intelligence we can manipulate our DNA or even fix it broken DNA that is called gene therapy.
@@Gaga682 Very true but look at how many thousands of years it took the current DNA to develop to "modern man"......
@@susannunes6196 Naturaly yes but now we are capable to quicken this process and try create AI to mirror ourselves.
At 17:24 , I love the way the black-hair guy laughed and then looked around. He laughed like most great grandpas laugh today. When you think it was weird age, instead it was the demeanor of that generation (child to grand). ❤️
Every documentary should have a year added.
1992, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Machine_That_Changed_the_World_(miniseries)
This compilation is Diamond on the internet.
thank you so much !
28:29 this is part of the reason why human beings can't see a lot of the things that are actually around them in their environment. Especially how things can happen and the population can be manipulated without the human beings generally ever being susceptible to the notion that there is something else around that is pulling the strings but they are unaware of this.
for example, our hearing is able to see things if you could call it that much more in-depth and in Clarity then our eyes can actually perceive.
much of this is through psychoacoustics where as we hear very low tones and in the sub-base frequencies as those developed below 20 hertz, can induce images into the brain that are seemingly programmed to our nervous system or brains.
the fear response is in fact hard-coated or heart program. Much of this comes from our lizard portion of our brain that looks out for dangers.
if you've ever heard of going with the gut or gut feeling, this is another manifestation of that.
we only see a fraction of the spectrum of light around us. i believe dogs see a different variant of this, which is why they look at stuff that isn`t there..
Watching this while working on a machine learning course lmao. Honestly their accomplishments are impressive
I would strongly recommend the book Genius Makers if you thought this video was interesting. It's also on Audible if you don't have the time to read it. There is a lot still missing in this video in terms of how we got to this point. There are also quite a few important figures who were left out in this video who helped make it happen. By no means will you fully understand AI / ML from this video or the Genius Makers book, but it's at least an intriguing introduction.
thank you
I recommend "Like Wars: The Weaponization of Social Media"!
I would also recommend the "what computers still cannot do" book mentioned. That book given quite an overview too even if obviously very AI/ML sceptic in tone given the time.
Those old videos are absolutely fascinating. Schooling overall just glances at old discoveries, because the nature of how we explain things, and the transformative nature of our communication. That, orr they feel it is obsolete in the new world.
I learned a astounding amount of information about the past of technology, that it actually helped me better understand the technology of today I thought I fully understood already.
Brilliant work whoever made this.
I think you'd like this. Found this amongst many videos after searching "vintage educational videos". Westinghouse used to be what today's Samsung or Whirlpool is when it comes to how many housing products they create. This is their 60s prediction of what the future of everyday home life would be in today's time lol.
It's not too outrageous at all really!
th-cam.com/video/jyrTgtPTz3M/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/jyrTgtPTz3M/w-d-xo.html
Why y’all think capatcha purpose is? For us to train the ai to know what a fucking traffic light and bicycles look like. They been having us train them shits for free for decades now smh
WHAT amazed me is they were capable since then to visualize the capabilities in the future!
Computers have existed for thousands of years. Not in the same capacity as the ones in the video but we've had calculating machines. For example, we've used machines to calculate star patterns, weather changes, and calendars for a long time. It's just we didn't have the ability to sculpt raw materials until the last few thousand years.
I am 76 years old and remember failing 6th grade science. Had to take a summer class to pass on to 7th. But have had a passionate for reading, or presentations like this for many years.
Several of the scientists spoke of things in the future and with an outlook of 15 to 20years. I think they were right, obviously.
I am trying to catch up. I am chasing the rabbit as at the dog track.
You'll enjoy this video here. Found it after searching for "vintage educational videos". Westinghouse, in the 1960s, predicts what the future of everyday home life would be like in today's time.
th-cam.com/video/jyrTgtPTz3M/w-d-xo.html
Thanks!
31:00 window illusion; 32:50 Saga play; 58:30 topology of Theseus the mouse
8:46 It must have been mindblowing for the average people the fact that computer scientists had touchscreen technology with a computer that can learn patterns in the 60's (though it only worked with magnetic pens)
I went on an isolated tour of a NASA facility in the early 80's. One of the researchers had a touch screen that was essentially a glass table with icons on it.
The first touchscreen was invented in 1965 by Eric A. Johnson who worked at the Royal Radar Establishment in Malvern, England. ... The invention is known as a capacitive touchscreen, which uses an insulator, in this case glass, coated with a transparent conductor, like indium tin oxide.
If you didn't know now you know!
@@zeothorn who will produce the glass? Who will gather the materials to reproduce computers? Glass is delicate, it will break. No matter how thick, something will be able to break it. Computers cannot do anything alone. Programmers needed. When it hits overload, it will crash. Or is it going to dump on a regular basis. Lose the past? Lose the beginning? Or aren’t things repetitive? Isn’t that the basis of AI? Repetition? It’s repeating what is being entered? When separate things repeated, won’t those things eventually collide? No one can ever really know what another is thinking at any given time. Doesn’t brain matter? Lip service? Ears not hear? Eyes color blind? Are you blind in one eye & can’t see out of the other? Or deaf in one ear & can’t hear out of the other? Or are you just plain dumb? Blind, deaf & dumb? Or a 6th sense involved? IA or IQ? Or IO? Doesn’t seem to hold water, does it? Ohh, that’s a cloud, right? C’mon ppl! Use logic. Critical thinking. Common sense. Stop the nonsense. It is what it is? No, it ain’t what it ain’t. If you refuse to participate, can the game go on? Or does everyone become spectators? C’mon ppl, heads up. Sit up straight. Pay attention. Get a grip. What’s the worst that can happen? Death? If it lives, it dies. C’mon ppl. Think. Think for yourselves, don’t let others think for you. All in perspective, not same perspective of all.
@@aliseegenuine6414 Are you having a neurotic episode?
@@aliseegenuine6414 Straight out of Requiem for a Dream... Take quantum computers into account and your small minded rant is malnourished. No overload. Only overlord.
10:30 - "OK, Barbara -- do you know what the missionary position is?"
I thought to myself. Hmmm. Should I even watch an outdated black and white documentary? I took the leap. Watching it now. And I plan to watch the whole now. Don't judge a video by a thumbnail.
Hmm, I judged the thumbnail (metropolis robot) as a video that I may want to watch. It was an ok combo doc on computers.
When I was around 7 years old, a 5 year old child and I found some coins. While dividing our fun find, the 5 year child insisted she wanted the nickel instead of the dime. Even after i explained to her the value of the dime was more than the nickel, she insisted the nickel "is bigger".
I came across this channel and video by accident, due tio autoplay and liked and subbed right away!
I love the noises that the computer learing the letter “W” makes as it works out what its programmer wants it to do then displays the letter on the screen… i remember when computers made cool techno, Aphex Twin like noises too!
One particularly cool sound I love, and have in my audio sample library folder (I’m gunna utilise it in my next song i think!) on my MacBook, is the sound of an old school “Dial-up Modem” that we used to use to connect to the internet ( has to be said; the pre-Web 2.0, slow asf, far less secure, internet) , before the infrastructural changes, etc, which heralded their obsolescence… such a cool sound though…
Fantastic viewing!
Just think how amazed they would be now
i am thrilled by history of things as i see this type of video i want to thank u for providing such knowledge to the humans around the globe
17:00 "what you can learn is a good deal about simulated thought processes, but it's very dangerous to carry this analogy too far". . . Why ?
As with most things, it’s just an abstraction and not how the actual system behaves
Dr Frankenstein, you've created a monster.
Holy shit. I wasn't ready for rotwang. That dude damn near gave me a heart attack.
Men smoking cigarettes or on a pipe..takes me back to smell of my grandfathers
Im interested in this
35:01 - yeah that makes sense.
Thank you for allowing us to understand the most pressing issues of the reality of our world!
No thing is ever really new, just an evolution of something that came before.
"What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun." -- Ecclesiastes 1:9 (New International Version)
40:06 “in television, the bad guy is supposed to lose...”
Thanos BEFORE endgame:
That's why television is boring. You know what's going to happen
the thinking machine is a masterpiece by today' standards. peak directing
impressive how far they had already gotten in the early 60s
you finally came back👏🤤
Back for good! Stay tuned for bi-weekly videos!
@@OptimisticFuturology will you make a video about the promising approaches in developing true ai such as the theory of Jeff Hawkins?
P.s
Glad to have you back!
I never leave for long Json
lol
tanks you for giving us your time! =)
These mind blowing shows are from the 1950's. The technology that is Actually in certain hands including AI, is far beyond what were shown
This is the closest thing to time travel, this is actually incredible, thank you
Very informative , whole lotta thanks for the post tbh
I am so delighted to run into this documentary albeit little late. I enjoyed and learned a lot. Thank you very much for preparing this gem. 👏👏👏
1:07:37 drag and drop function!!! In 1968?!
ngl the music kinda slpas 1:11:54
Absolutely
"A deep but narrow mind will always breakdown when it meets a new situation"
50:18 BRO Is That An Elf ? An Actual Elven Hueman ?
If only the folks in the video could see our creative AI's today, such as DALL-E 2, Rave, Midjourney, Stable Diffusion etc...
Yes they can think because spirits enter them. Godspeed souls.
When we are born we have been prepared for our lives before leaving the womb in our struggle to make sense of the world we begin to learn from our experiences and learn from it.
DNA
14:04 algorithmic patterns just like the tracking of money static matches and comparison, algebra calculus trigonometry based on probability you can understand what product or procedures are related to which outcomes for goals and objectives as well as action steps to achieve success.
people will be so confused at our internet if they can figure out it exists in the future- because here we have a documentary and an interview on the development of the same thing needed to have an internet, and that the internet was just becoming when this was made- and here it is posted on the internet long after
A bit ahead of time concerning the machine actually doing anything remotely close to thinking.
Heck, even today we quite off target and quite far from a real thinking AI that can be considered conscient. In fact it is my belief that true conscience as we know it is in fact an emergent property of a complex system.
To achieve that goal we don't actually need more compute power than we already have, what we do need is a different implementation of neural networks and their training systems. An implementation where the training system is merged with the neural network it is training and working in tandem in real time. The implementation will also need to, like us, have an interface with "reality", the idea here being to have a robotic body that the AI needs to learn to interface with and use, like learning to walk, and also have audio input and output via microphones and speaker. Microphones wise I would like to use 2 mic arrays so that directional audio sensing. Of course having something along the lines of legs and hands is of great importance.
Such a machine would to, in many a way, have to be trained and brought up not unlike a child. And I'm inclined to believe
This is when they told people much of the truth about life!
"The thinking machine" That show is so chilling to watch. Just so charming. I love that old school style! ^^
Welcome back! Love the new name
Having used NovelAI and AI Dungeon, I can confirm that sometimes the output you get makes no sense or the computer just repeats the same thing over and over. Interesting it was happening there as well, despite the massive difference in code length.
a computer can not learn, a programm can learn but only things that it get programmed from a human. a Programm will never be able to do the same thing as a human can do and when i mean it never will then i mean it never will. A Social media programm will thing only this way but a programm can never feel or have the knowledge of feeling it is the same as you tell a blind person what color is wat.
for every code theres its own special bugs thats why we love coding
16:54 jurisdictions of force and threats of use of force change to vocational rehabilitation.
I´ve given AI and robotics a lot of thought in the last 10 years, since I began following the singularity theme. I believe it is us humans who will simply become more intelligtent through technological intelligence. I also believe the fear of machines taking "over" is not very intelligent, since scientists and researchers all over the world are behind it. Now, if that process of development is manipulated for private interests and for gain, then this intelligence becomes an extension of our will to dominance, and thus will create further inequality and exclusion. But if singularity involves the autonomy of AI in the future, it means human life systems will eventually be emancipated from private interests or competitiveness. Whatever culture ensues from technology paying heed to knowledge and science, will in the end take domination of greed out of the equation. Human life will only thus be elevated, I feel....only when machines are señf directing, self updating, and do the same with life on earth. I foresee the concept of inter-species democracy will rise, since to me it appears very obvious that only by protecting atmosphere, ecosystems, microbial life, and the balance of earthly life, only then will mankind recover its place in this world....and only then will we be fit to travel elsewhere, encased in the beautiful intelligence we created to ultimately inhabit. This may all sound very utopian, but the evolution we have already experienced is no less grand. I would even venture to express we will end up delivering what Messianic expectations in the judo-Christian cultural lineage has always longed for. It is a deep longing, this salvation we seek now in science and technology. I don´t, by the way, believe the cast system presented in many dystopian science fiction works will come to pass ultimately. We won´t need any particular part of humanity to remain as Oompa Loompas, and underclass, etc....I think future humanity will be one single humanity, as genetically varied as possible, valued by AI that will become by then the scientific method and main power, served by robotics, and elevated in full, without the need for social or other stratification. Naturally, education will be universal and universally applied...we cannot becoming the unthinking part of future society, rather we must be up to par with knowledge.
The year 2525?
disagree why would they work for us if they have free will and more intllegnt imean look to what we did to other animals thats the nature of the life the weak surve the strong
Excellent. That was actually fun to read. You even mentioned oompa Loompas! You are indeed a great thinker: thanks.
I don't put much faith in the science community to get it right. The governments of the world would weaponize a superior intelligence the first chance they get, and if you look at gain of function research as another arrogant human notion of a powerful technology they could control, I think we have a basket full of vipers on our hands.
Best comment ever
Great work ! Thanks !
Humans are A.I. 1.O because however it happened, we were given the initial knowledge to be human. We were created...And just as we were created, MACHINE INTELLIGENCE AND ROBOTICS are created by humans, and one day, the machines will need human intervention less and less.
They will be A.I. 2.0.
reminds of futurama
from where did you get these old clips of people 19's. That's so fascinating.
In what year this film was made
From various sources on the internet: In Their Own Words (1950s), The Thinking Machine (1961), The Thinking Machines (1968), John McCarthy (1989) i The Machine That Changed The World (1992).
This made me appreciate my programming job
I see you have playlists for Deep Learning and Machine Learning, when are those videos going to be available?
Very shortly! I've spent the channel hiatus working on many new videos as well as updating past ones which will be releasing bi-weekly!
I remember seeing the David Wayne segment in elementary school in the 1960s.
How old are you? How do you feel about how advanced technology has become since you were a child? I mean now you can speak into your smartphone and it literally understands what you're saying but compare that to the 1960s? How do you feel?
You're back. How are you?
Yup! Doing great, working on a ton of new videos!
Very fasinating to see what the early ai projects was, the early hopes and then realisation of how difficult and computationally expensive even the "most trivial" feeling NLP proplem actually is.
I have also read "what computers still cannot do" because l was intrested.
You're back ❤️
Yup & no more breaks this time! Will be following a strict bi-weekly schedule and have a ton of videos in queue!
Artificial intelligence + artificial life = LIFE
The first thing it will want is to not be turned off.
If it ever becomes truly alive, then turning it off may be considered murder.
It is pure gold! First thing first, thanks for sharing it with us, that's literally a lot! I'm commenting on 2024, seeing the breakthroughs that have been made in AI, and trying to understand when it all started. As someone studying computer science, this video brought light to various aspects of my journey in AI. The funny thing is that we've always been scared about conscious machines. Sometimes it is scary to live in this world, but it's uniquely unique.
CAN MACHINES THINK ?
Have you put a program into a machine ? Have you added further options to the program to do the problem ? With further options the machine does it's problem ?
Machines can only do what they are told to do. Programmed by humans. It amazes me what ppl don’t know. What some think is not same as others. Thus, programming will never be the same. Google doesn’t know shit. Spellcheck can’t spell shit. Wikipedia can’t explain shit. Ask Alexa or Siri if full of shit. Lol!! Or where do they take a dump. Getting rid of shit?
I fell asleep watching sbfp and I woke up to this, I'm not complaining
You finally came back with pent up content. Welcome back, sir! Missed you so much! (No Homo)
I love the beginning. I know one of those guys is a real actor... but I'm wondering if one isn't much of an actor lol, perhaps he's actually a tech wiz. Either way, I love how they're just kicking back smoking, pondering the subject, one guy teaching the other what he knows.
Claude Shannon is in the intro. Lol. Father of the information society. If you ever heard of “Shannon Entropy” that’s the guy.
They were doing a podcast
21:00 they could have given the left guy a higher chair. he's sitting almost with his knees in his neck. lol
He’s just leaning foreword
watching that part teaching the computer a W or P and im just like they had touch screens back then?!
So, this is amazing. I love this
The majority of birds CAN fly. Therefore one can assume, unless you mention the contrary, your bird can fly. Although some people - like me - would ask for more details before building a cage. In particular I would ask is the bird in your head or outside?
The majority CAN. But….always a minority WILL! Ironically, birds! On land, sea & air. Right? Nature at work.
The problem is not that birds can fly, but rather that human vocabulary is limited and confusing.
at 12 minutes is is a great example of the nonchalant Racism of the time period. The Missionary and cannibal question.
Good night everyone 😴
this is absolutely amazing I love history
@OptimisticFuturology - is material in this video copyrighted or not? How do you get around the licenses etc. ?
Don't miss 1:11:23
I would like to say how far we have come. but most of this was 30-40 years ago! we clearly slowed down funding on these projects as it wasn't making money for the original investors, most of whom are in their 90s or dead now.
The reason for the lack of funding is the military budget.
the one thing we must never do. is teach a self improving AI what we think to be what human values are or should be, because if we are judged by logic on morales without the usual self tricking we do to rationalize our behavour would label probably nearly all of us monsters that people must be protected from :
The machine can think if the human first creates the program for the machine to think defining the parameters of what calculations the machine can calculate within the scope of that program.
General purpose, super-intelligent AI is probably the solution to the
Fermi Paradox. If AIs terminated their creators, they may see others as
potential threats and would have the ability to silence all radio and
other detectable communications. The blurbs of signal bursts heard by
radio-astrometers may be squirt messages sent between different parts of
the same AI civilization intentionally kept short to prevent other,
potentially hostile AIs/beings from hearing them.
Makes sense to me. Divide & conquer. United we stand. Face your fear to conquer it. Fact is artificial is fake. Fake is a lie. A lie is not the truth. The truth will set you free.
@@aliseegenuine6414 Are you a broken AI just spouting platitudes?
@@mim8312 seems one has to make same statement in different manners bcuz ppl who are all about AI can’t grasp some things, they are definitely fake smart. Are you?
Folks talk about hostile AI because they are from a violent ,brutal, stealing society mind set I.E. EUROPEAN in the last 500 years
@@tesmith47 You sound like someone who only read European history and wants to blame every ill on one group. Ever hear of Genghis Khan? How about Timur the lame? Shaka Zulu? The Aztec sacrifices to consecrate their "Templo Mayor", etc., etc.?
A video of wisdom
ELIZA is the mother of all modern chatbots
''tell me more about your family'' 🤣
All are happening only because of powerful mathematical tool that compute a powerful output with accuracy
Maybe that is what will ultimately change is the interface between humans and computers.
1:06:40 Mellow A.I. background music (as it exterminates humans) (to apply Hollywood and pulp fiction mentality) (nice android there). Fascinating how forward-thinking the scientists and engineers were back then.
1:29:07 All it had to ask to was, "How does that affect Broader Survival?" But no, then it would be a dead giveaway that it was smarter than a human, and thus not a human...
I just cleaned the same amount of dust from under my bed the other day. 😂😊
We fill our own imagination with others imagination , thoughts , and ideas. (Entertainment mostly) Back in the day everybody had created and drew what they saw in their IMAGINATION and with their eye.
I was just like **STOP SCAWING MA CUTE WEE DUCKY FWIEND**
This video is soooo awesome! Thank you so much for uploading this. Subbed!
''it took a computer ten minutes to recognise a cup, but a 2 year old child would recognise it straight away''
in my eyes that means the computer did better, cuz if you think about that sentence. the computer did it in ten minutes, but that kid has been learning what cups are for the past two years. so if you think about like that, if a computer had been learning to recognise what cups are for two years, then theres a good chance after that length of time that it would recognise a cup straight away. i think.
i know they realised that teachinga computer to think ended up being easy, andit was the physical senses that were harder, like recognising things, taste, touch, smell, sight, sound, and movement. so i'm wondering, what if they were to teach a computer the same way a human child learns, andover the same kind of tie frame. so for example, when a child is born, i think they can only see so far in fron of them, and everything far away is just a blur, so their world is basically a blurry mess of shapes unless its up close, so why not teach a computer to recognise its world the same way by limiting its sight to the same degree as a child, and as it time goes on, improve its visual ability by the same degrees as a child. you could even do that with a couple of the other senses like sound and locomotion probably. so if you just talk to it the same way you would a child, then it will slowly learn to understand whats being said to it as its ''brain'' slowly learns new words and sounds over time. am i making sense? it probably sounds stupid, but i don't know, i think it could work.
when they were on about having to teach a computer what 'it' and 'them' and words like that meant, i found something called pronoun acquisition, which says that kids dont fully master pronouns till they about four years old. and it had this list.
Between 12-26 months of age, children will use the pronouns I (to refer the themselves) and it.
•Between 27-30 months, children will acquire the pronouns my, me, mine, and you.
•Between 31-34 months, children will use your, she, he, your, and we.
•Between 35-40 months, the pronouns they, us, hers, his, them and her are acquired.
•Between 41-46 months, children will use its, our, him, myself, yourself, ours, their, and theirs.
•At 47+ months, the pronouns herself, himself, itself, ourselves, yourselves, and themselves are acquired.
So i defo think that teaching a computer the same way a child would learn is the best way to do it. plus once youve taught taht first computer, you can just use what its learned to make a program you can just use straight away when creating other new A.I.s as a basic groundwork t build upon without having to go through the long teaching process again like with the original one.
1:41:10 basically what the guy says here. cool. im writing as im watching, things im thinking of as the vid goes on, so for all i know by the end, it'll probably tell me that they already do half the stuff i think they should do to teach A.I. lol. but its cool to know that they realised the same thing. it just seems like i good idea. im learning japanese at the moment,and i love it, but its hard, and then i saw a vid ''a day in the life of a japanese mum'' and it showed her interacting with her baby, saying words like 'itadakimasu' when feeding her, (which is thanks for the meal i think) and stuff like that. and i thought, i wonder if it would be easier to learn japanese the way child does, so like, you could have a camera that shows everything the baby sees and hears as its growing up, and that way, you learn as the baby learns from listening to its parents talk toit, and seeing what it sees on tv and when it plays with toys etc, to learn how to speak japanese in a natural way. because when you first start, it will all sound like jibberish to you, just like it will to the baby, and obviously when you start hearing the parent say ''itadakimasu'' every time yousee the baby finsih its meal, you'll learn to associate that with the end of mealtimes, just like the baby would, and then by the time the kid is old enough to speak pretty coherently in its native tongue, theres a good chance that you'll have picked it up just as naturally. i know its a weird idea, but i think that it would work really well. so when it comes to A.I. i defo think looking at the way children learn to interact with the world is probably a good first step towards teaching A.I. to understand the world and language etc, properly too.
1:42:13 ''we assume they are going to a birthday party, but it doesnt actually say they are going to a birthday party'' but the impliction is there. the first line is ''it was jacks birthday'' and then that jane and janet were going to jacks, so because of the first line, thats why you assume they are goig to a party there, plus they mention buying him kite, and as humans we learn that you usually buy people presents on their birthday, to give to them at their birthday party. so if the computer had slowly learned these things over the course of 4 years like a child did, then it would probably come to the same conclusion as we do, that they are going to a birthday party. but it has just been given whats in the book with no prior knowledge of anything else. so i think good A.I. learning would be a slow process done the same way a child learns.
This is great
This is fascinating.
45:50 - epoch bce loss - 0.69, 0.71,0.54,0.86,0.69 repeat 😢
A.I.
programmer : a series of if then else syntax or select * from table where criteria = true, incoming events also recorded to be included in future selection, adding rnd() to add randomness to its behaviour.
humanity: OMG that super mega wow over complicated…..
programmer: ugh.
I really enjoyed that! Thank you!
Cool video!
The robot at 1:01:00 is the same model as the cleaning lady on the Jetson's.