That question would I choose “A OR B” I said neither right away cause Numbers don’t lie but they don’t tell you the whole story especially with a small sample size if you know how the nfl works
I would say that it’s better than waiting until after his 5th year and having to pay him +60m a year because someone rose the price the year before. I think this was a strategic move. He definitely has the talent to be what everyone thought. However you don’t want to wait and pay him in a ever increasing market. I’ve watched everyone of his games in the NFL. As a Jaguars fan I was not on board with him coming here. But after watching his first season with Urban I seen he definitely has what it takes. Also your comparison is disingenuous, his first year was about as worst a situation and rookie qb can come into. Y’all haters don’t want to admit that though. You are right about the Lamar though.
As a strategic move I do think it could be smart to pay early because the price will only increase later. I’m just not convinced YET he will be the guy to take the Jags to the big games.
@@LegitJonex Just going to the playoffs is big games to us. Having us in the conversation is a step up. Expecting him to have expectation to go to the Super Bowl constant basis is unrealistic. Getting to one is possible and he’s shown he has what it takes to get us there.
The goal every year should be to compete for a chance to win the Super Bowl. A Top 3 earner at any position should be a true game changer in my eyes. Just paying to pay is not a smart routine the NFL as a whole has found it self in. Jags had potentially 2-3 season to keep evaluating and building around Lawrence. We have seen teams have more success with QBs on rookie deals where they can put the correct pieces together to help out young stars.
This was a very good video but I hope Trevor Lawrence ends up being elite next season 🤗
I hope so too. Thank you!
If y'all take time and look at his contract y'all will understand why they paid him now instead of complaining about his contract.
The price will only continue to rise for a starting QB. But will he still be the guy in 3 years?
That question would I choose “A OR B” I said neither right away cause Numbers don’t lie but they don’t tell you the whole story especially with a small sample size if you know how the nfl works
I agree sometimes you have to dig deeper to see what’s really going on.
I would say that it’s better than waiting until after his 5th year and having to pay him +60m a year because someone rose the price the year before. I think this was a strategic move. He definitely has the talent to be what everyone thought. However you don’t want to wait and pay him in a ever increasing market.
I’ve watched everyone of his games in the NFL. As a Jaguars fan I was not on board with him coming here. But after watching his first season with Urban I seen he definitely has what it takes. Also your comparison is disingenuous, his first year was about as worst a situation and rookie qb can come into. Y’all haters don’t want to admit that though. You are right about the Lamar though.
As a strategic move I do think it could be smart to pay early because the price will only increase later. I’m just not convinced YET he will be the guy to take the Jags to the big games.
@@LegitJonex Just going to the playoffs is big games to us. Having us in the conversation is a step up. Expecting him to have expectation to go to the Super Bowl constant basis is unrealistic. Getting to one is possible and he’s shown he has what it takes to get us there.
The goal every year should be to compete for a chance to win the Super Bowl. A Top 3 earner at any position should be a true game changer in my eyes. Just paying to pay is not a smart routine the NFL as a whole has found it self in. Jags had potentially 2-3 season to keep evaluating and building around Lawrence. We have seen teams have more success with QBs on rookie deals where they can put the correct pieces together to help out young stars.