Biggest war criminal on the planets, its absolute shame to have them in Finland. Same country that flew torture prisoners to a torture camp via Finland. Camp that lies on occupied territory.
🇫🇮🇺🇸 as finn who have trained first one year in tank company and then 8 times i have been called in training, this video make me happy. Its important to know how to move with tanks when there is only forrest and mud. I give my respect to 🇺🇸💪
@@spoonzor1 "The short ton (abbreviation tn[1]) is a measurement unit equal to 2,000 pounds (907.18 kg). It is commonly used in the United States, where it is known simply as a ton;[1] however, the term is ambiguous, the single word "ton" being variously used for short, long, and metric tons."
@@wanhapatu Ah, ty for explaining! So, if I understand correctly 80 short tons are 907.18kg * 80? Don't be so stubborn, come to the metric side of the world : )
They surely did when Abrams / Bradleys visited first time, in Fin style not scripted head on battle. 😉😆 Since, they have changed not to act here with any hubris.
@@mattilatvala4164Was that exercise the one there is clip in YT where US sergeant tells his troops, "all our tanks are gone, we have few Bradleys"...??
Notice how the Finns handle this in both languages(and mock their own performance while at it). Also the forest is our sacred ground, it has literally shielded us from the Vikings and other conqurers for centuries when needed. Learn to move in it, and you will be safe here.
Probably too much trouble for a few days of exercise. They would have to be painted twice, because they would be painted back to the original colour after the exercise.
¡Es un placer para mi poder disfrutar de este vídeo,me encanta y mis felicitaciones a todo el personal militar de ambas naciones a través de estos entrenamientos y el trabajo en el terreno se especializan más en lo que se dedican,excelente trabajo gracias!👍😊
@@user-zr5yw2st1e yep, finnish army is smol but very strong like you can leave a finn below freezing without clothing and they'd just find a way to survive and walk away like it's nothing. the russians would probably freeze or get hypothermia.
As a Brit I mean no disrespect to my fellow US allies...... but .... Do whatever the Finns tell you. Finland has spent nearly a century preparing for war with Russian in some of the most bleak lands in "Northern Europe". The Finns are experts in the regional geography, experts in camouflage and experts in guerrilla warfare. NATO would be wise to learn from the Finns. Last time Russia tried to invade, Finland won the regional snowman competition. Google that .....its darker than you can imagine.
That, is a horrendous idea. Not because the Finns don’t how to defend against a Russian invasion, they definitely do, but because the doctrines of the US and Finland vary vastly and need adjusting since Finland joined NATO. The Finns don’t know how to fight with NATO by their side. Basically, the US military doctrine is centered around the idea of “shock and awe”. This means devastating the enemy with precision air/artillery ordnance, then moving in. This is shared by all anglosphere nations, with the other four relying on the US for logistical and air support, contributing mainly just ground troops. Aside from the Brits who are able to deploy some of their own air power. Finland’s doctrine is asymmetrical warfare, use borderline guerilla tacitcs to repel a larger, better equipped force. These two doctrines conflict with each other, and the equipment of each country is designed for their doctrine. So the Americans shouldn’t do whatever the Finns say or vice versa, they need to learn for their doctrines to work together. That’s the whole point of this exercise.
@@MRtapio5 Yeah, Russia lost, but so did Finland, and I’ll explain why. For the Soviets, the war was a complete disaster. It exposed just how unprepared and disorganized their military was, with poor leadership and outdated tactics. Sure, they eventually forced Finland to negotiate, but at a massive cost of over 120,000 soldiers dead, and their reputation as a military power took a serious hit. Stalin hoped for a quick, easy victory, but instead, the war became a drawn-out, costly embarrassment right before World War II. For Finland, they kept their independence, but it wasn’t exactly a win either. They lost 11% of their territory, including Karelia, which was a major economic area, and had to resettle 400,000 people. That was a huge economic and social strain, and it left them in a more vulnerable position moving forward. Finland did manage to hold its ground impressively, but both sides walked away worse off than when they started.
Those US tanks look amazing! Glad to have you here, visiting Finland. As well, these Finns drive like a proper race car driver. haha.. small pun intended there. Do you know what's the difference between Finland and Russia? We like to build bridges, but, the bad neighbour of ours, likes to destroy them. Slava Ukraini, from Finland, with love. _Samuli
I wrote this in response to someone asking if they ever train to take trenches, and then it became entirely too long to be just a reply no one reads, so I decided to post this as a general message: In general, the US and NATO definitely have the discipline, knowledge, and training to execute successful attacks on trench defenses and well-defended emplacements utilizing the study of all past historical conflicts plus daily analysis of current conflicts and trends, including the weapons and tactics used by all sides (think of the Ukraine war as an ongoing graduate-level course with daily classes for thousands of stratefy-minded individuals within US/NATO). However, option 1 would still be to spend tens of billions in 5th generation and ultimately 6th generation air assets (into the next decade), drones, electronic warfare, air defense, SEAD/DEAD capabilities, and combined arms operations to actively suppress and destroy the enemy air assets, enemy air defenses, and effectively destroy all ground obstacles including trenches before rolling forward. There would be some inevitable losses and MANPADS will always present a threat, although I believe word would travel fast when all such aunches are promptly followed up by a counterattack on the originating grid square turning any launch into an effective suicide mission. Then the real question becomes: when Russia is absolutely defeated, all of their airfields are out of action and their remaining air assets well behind their borders out of the fight unless tehy want to be shot down, does Russia use nukes still, despite the fact the US has no interest in physically invading Russia? It becomes a serious issue, as their paranoia makes them believe NATO actually wants their largely empty country for unknown reasons or wants to actually kill people of Russian heritage, when in fact, Russia was not on the US's proverbial radar AT ALL until they foolishly decided to attack Ukraine, which about 90% of countries worldwide consider unprovoked and simply wrong.
Sensors for the training equipment. They have lasers on the guns and those sensors on the helmets to detect hits when they occur. Think of it as fancier laser tag.
The Finnish forest looks brutal to fight in. We have some very similar terrain all over the US, but fighting in those forests in the Finnish winter would just be condensed suffering.
@@Trve_Kvlt Aye, it's pretty characteristic of this nation. Forests, lakes make it difficult to penetrate, and some parts of it are completely shut off for any kind of vehicle beside maybe a stubborn donkey.
@@Dev_Six Especially in the wetlands. I went hiking on some pretty rough unmarked trails that I found in Helventinjärvi last summer. Put all my brand new Varusteleka gear to some good work.
Are these exercises ever about taking a fortified trench position with mines and dragon teeth? would be fun to see how NATO would take those positions that Russia is currently using in Ukraine
Sadly they dont ever show that stuff, all we get to see in the media during any sort of NATO training (even going back years) is some soldiers moving from cover to cover and shooting at something out of view, they never really show any actual tactics or 'cool stuff', they probably have strict rules about whats allowed to be shown. Realistically, i dont think a trench with some mines and dragon teeth would be any sort of issue, if NATO were to ever rock up to Russian border they would just use a sh*t load of tanks, shoot ground to blow up the mines and blow away half the dragon teeth, drive over the remaining teeth & trench :P Dragon teeth are somewhat effective when theres 1-10 tanks, not when theres 100's. Also i think its safe to assume that recent tanks (like the ones most NATO members use) have mine detection (at least when driving slowly) so they would just be alerted about them before hitting them.
Facilitating the movement of friendly forces is one of the main tasks of combat engineers. For example the United States has all the tools to make this really easy. I mean as easy as anything can be during war. Relatively straightforward and easy. The mines for example could be cleared with mine-breaching line charges, plowed aside with plows, detonated with rollers and especially in difficult terrain with demolition charges such as Bangalore torpedoes. Plenty of choice. Those combat engineer units would be protected by mobile air-defense, counter-battery radars and systems like M270 MLRS which allow for incredibly accurate and devastating counterbattery fire. I'm not even accounting for things such as close air support and ways to bypass enemy defenses.
I was the guy behind the rock on the first clip so I can tell that this exact situation was about coming across some mines on the road so our tanks had to stop and then we came across american troops holding that road on top of this ridge in these exact trenches so we had to stop our tanks and clear the ambush by attacking the trenches
@@teroleikkila please highlight where I said the bridge couldn’t take it. I specifically said it flexes when the Abrams crosses over. That’s it. And if you refer to the video, there is clear flexing and creaking. Point being, the Abrams is a big, heavy tank. That’s it, that’s the point. Not sure why you seemed to have missed it.
I noticed more and more U.S. armored vehicles are starting to get their woodland paint jobs since the focus is now in Europe and the Pacific. I guess it just takes time to get all the existing vehicles over time that came back from the Middle East. Granted, the newer ones in the factory are coming out fresh with the woodland paint.
Yeah, we got Europe's largest artillery and "few" tanks. But we need more long distance missiles and lots of high quality drones. If drones fly over 70m high, you don't see and hear it at all. Those are present day must have equipments.
Americans and other allies will find out in exercises that all Finns have at least decent English language skills. In Finland television programs ment to adult audience are never dubbed, just subtitled.
Russians who support the cock-a-doodle notion of "returning Finland to the Motherland" should watch this video. It will disabuse them of their stupid idea. Finland joining NATO was the smartest thing it did in a century.
@@jaden18860They actually are repaiting the vehicles, since things are happening back in Europe and the Pacific. It take awhile to repaint these vehicles.
Sim bands to determine if you're hit or not. There's a laser pointer attached to people's weapons that activates when one shoots. If that beam (the "bullet") hits one of those receiver circles, you're considered dead/wounded.
''2 sided combat simulation system'' basically laser responders. The weapons have the laser system and when ever they shoot blanks, it sends a flash of laser to the direction they're shooting at, in case of hit the simulation system tells you that you're wounded/fatally wounded or such.
So 1st Air Cavalry with Finnish troops. Who are the "op forces"? Those US bradley IFVs are TALL compared to Finnish CV90 IFVs. And our Abrams looke bigger than the Finns' Leopard 2 tanks. But Ukrainian troops love the Bradley IFVs. ->After days of researching Finland's military situation I feel that ANY (conventional) Russian attack on Finland would result in horrible losses to the Russians. Even a Phyrric victory would be impossible for them. "Russia used to have the 2nd best army in the world. Now it has the 2nd best army in Ukraine."
Usually Finnish troops vs American troops, then both sides have a few men from the other side overseeing, and confirming laser "hits" and "kills", sometimes they mix the troops for interoperability, for Instance American troops working with Finnish fire control etc. Yes the American tanks/APC are bigger. Also, a lot of the times Finnish reservists are participating in these training drills, which is why you see out of shape bearded men with long hair running around, because they just showed up from civilian life for a couple days training.
unfair for the mericans to just use CLU without anyone in the squad even carrying inert training tube for weight, let alone assemble it when need and disassemble, just popping out in the bush with "lightweight" naked clu and calling for mr. referee to "destroy" enemy tanks......
If I understand correctly, they do it this way because US Army's current system isn't compatible with Saab's, so the Finnish umpire marks the enemy vehicle as killed. In time, I think the idea that all systems will become compatible with each other.
@@gunnar6674 finns have saab compatible spike lr laser training missiles maybe only 5-10 pieces, almost allways they are unavaileble for war simulation use, but still, for training we have training missiles (have single ccd day seeker and ir optional if pluggin in seperate cooling gas, connections to clu, but obviusly missing all the warheads, flight and launch motors, flight controll surfaces etc, but still weight the realistic 13kg and can be usen to take locks with) also, dummy version exist that have nothing in them, just solid block of wood or fiberglass, has the realistic 13kg weight, carry straps, and the mount to the tripod and clu.. th-cam.com/video/aCmAaPde-2o/w-d-xo.html heres timestamped version of the manpacked version of the spike, finnish atgm squad carries 4 missiles and one clu and tripod, where as american counterparts carry single clu with imaginary missiles in this exersise, and the also the previus arrow21,
@@gunnar6674 Regardless if it's compatible or not, they could still carry an inert training tube for weight and assembly before firing to get proper training in rather than just using a naked CLU. But I guess they just took the easy way out and didn't carry that extra weight or didn't come prepared with inert training tubes for the exercise.
That’s my son riding on the tank at minute 9:16! So proud of him, miss him so much, counting the days until he gets HOME! 🪖❤️🇺🇸
Now he has experienced a nightless night (midnight sun)
Tell him "the internet" said hi & thanks for his service. ^^
Nice !!!! Greetings from Finland.
But he is black lmao
Here is Finn Vodka.. cheers from Turkey . We support you guys!
So glad to have the badass Fins by our side.
Hell yeah
Eteenpäin sanoi mummo lumessa! Much love from Sweden❤
Nice to have you in Finland. 🇫🇮🇺🇸
Biggest war criminal on the planets, its absolute shame to have them in Finland. Same country that flew torture prisoners to a torture camp via Finland. Camp that lies on occupied territory.
🎉
- 50% finns again??
@@user-zr5yw2st1e what
It´s always a pleasure to have our American friends over here training with our amazing sisters and brothers in Finland. ❤ Sweden
thanks from Finland and to Sweden
🇫🇮🇺🇸 as finn who have trained first one year in tank company and then 8 times i have been called in training, this video make me happy. Its important to know how to move with tanks when there is only forrest and mud. I give my respect to 🇺🇸💪
Good Job thanks for yur service.....greetings from germany
- 50% finns.oh!!! Really good job
Fins are badass! This small country kicked the shit out of monstrous soviets during winter war!
@@andreypersikov6214 And lost Karelia. Now they lost themselves.
@ИгорьШарипов-ш1й and Russians didn't get finland and now Russians cry daily about Finland joining NATO 😂
@@andreypersikov6214 I personally did not see any Russian crying about that!
Welcome to nato partnership, respect from France.
Excellent co-operation in Finland, thank you !! Some Finns, though, had hilarius comments saying by themselves as they are "beeing lazy" 🙂
Jep, looked bit lazy. 😅
That bridge took the weight of Abrams?! Awesome! And damn, those Leo2s and CV90s look sexy in the forest with that camo.
MLC80 so it can take 80 short tons. There are a few tons to spare.
The reason bridge is, is to divide enemy forces. That would'be the simpliest thing to blow that shit up.
@@wanhapatu what does "short" tons mean?
@@spoonzor1 "The short ton (abbreviation tn[1]) is a measurement unit equal to 2,000 pounds (907.18 kg). It is commonly used in the United States, where it is known simply as a ton;[1] however, the term is ambiguous, the single word "ton" being variously used for short, long, and metric tons."
@@wanhapatu Ah, ty for explaining! So, if I understand correctly 80 short tons are 907.18kg * 80? Don't be so stubborn, come to the metric side of the world : )
Aah Pahkajärvi training area. I was in many trainings in that area while doing my military service. But that was many years ago now.
With Finns? Well, then the americans are learning something....
Well I guess we all can learn from these kind of exercises.
They surely did when Abrams / Bradleys visited first time, in Fin style not scripted head on battle. 😉😆 Since, they have changed not to act here with any hubris.
@@mattilatvala4164Was that exercise the one there is clip in YT where US sergeant tells his troops, "all our tanks are gone, we have few Bradleys"...??
@@kimmoj2570 I was not there. I heard from a Fin top top tactical panzerjaeger commander. He uses "colorful" harsh language. 😆 USA was Marines.
Spoken like a true couch warrior who never served in the military
Notice how the Finns handle this in both languages(and mock their own performance while at it). Also the forest is our sacred ground, it has literally shielded us from the Vikings and other conqurers for centuries when needed. Learn to move in it, and you will be safe here.
I thought you guys are the Vikings:)
@@yesufabdulhakim9326 No. Other Nordic countries had Vikings, especially Norway.
Some finns did recruited as vikings.
Time to revive the classic green WW2 paint job for the tanks.
You Yanks are more than welcome to to train with us in Finland, but please paint those vehicles green! :D
🇺🇸 🇫🇮 🤝
Was joking about that as well 😅
That was a first thing I thought of.
Yankies
Probably too much trouble for a few days of exercise. They would have to be painted twice, because they would be painted back to the original colour after the exercise.
¡Es un placer para mi poder disfrutar de este vídeo,me encanta y mis felicitaciones a todo el personal militar de ambas naciones a través de estos entrenamientos y el trabajo en el terreno se especializan más en lo que se dedican,excelente trabajo gracias!👍😊
"vähän löysän näköstä"
:D
miss Suomi a lot. nice people decent society strong army.
Really???
@@user-zr5yw2st1e yep, finnish army is smol but very strong like you can leave a finn below freezing without clothing and they'd just find a way to survive and walk away like it's nothing. the russians would probably freeze or get hypothermia.
Guys you need to get the paint brushes out, tan might be ok in Niinisalo but the forest requires green 😊
The US troops have adapted to Finnish style camo with the tanks and IFVs.
Hmmm.. not our first rodeo fighting and using camo, sonny 😂
@@D-Z321 At least I haven't seen US troops using trees and branches to camo tanks/IFVs.
It's just an imperialist army with nothing...
@@edudos2 Cry more, Russian.
I think most EU armies use this addition to to the painted camo. I know for sure the German Army is using this a lot too.
Very nice to all us army soldier good job ❤❤ ❤
So much fun, i hope we can go back to train one day
Awesome job 🇺🇲🇫🇮💯
As a Brit I mean no disrespect to my fellow US allies...... but ....
Do whatever the Finns tell you.
Finland has spent nearly a century preparing for war with Russian in some of the most bleak lands in "Northern Europe".
The Finns are experts in the regional geography, experts in camouflage and experts in guerrilla warfare.
NATO would be wise to learn from the Finns.
Last time Russia tried to invade, Finland won the regional snowman competition.
Google that .....its darker than you can imagine.
Nobody won in that war. Both sides sued for peace. Moscow Peace Treaty.
That, is a horrendous idea. Not because the Finns don’t how to defend against a Russian invasion, they definitely do, but because the doctrines of the US and Finland vary vastly and need adjusting since Finland joined NATO. The Finns don’t know how to fight with NATO by their side.
Basically, the US military doctrine is centered around the idea of “shock and awe”. This means devastating the enemy with precision air/artillery ordnance, then moving in. This is shared by all anglosphere nations, with the other four relying on the US for logistical and air support, contributing mainly just ground troops. Aside from the Brits who are able to deploy some of their own air power.
Finland’s doctrine is asymmetrical warfare, use borderline guerilla tacitcs to repel a larger, better equipped force.
These two doctrines conflict with each other, and the equipment of each country is designed for their doctrine. So the Americans shouldn’t do whatever the Finns say or vice versa, they need to learn for their doctrines to work together. That’s the whole point of this exercise.
@@GridlockedRussia lost by not even getting small Finland
@@MRtapio5 Yeah, Russia lost, but so did Finland, and I’ll explain why.
For the Soviets, the war was a complete disaster. It exposed just how unprepared and disorganized their military was, with poor leadership and outdated tactics. Sure, they eventually forced Finland to negotiate, but at a massive cost of over 120,000 soldiers dead, and their reputation as a military power took a serious hit. Stalin hoped for a quick, easy victory, but instead, the war became a drawn-out, costly embarrassment right before World War II.
For Finland, they kept their independence, but it wasn’t exactly a win either. They lost 11% of their territory, including Karelia, which was a major economic area, and had to resettle 400,000 people. That was a huge economic and social strain, and it left them in a more vulnerable position moving forward. Finland did manage to hold its ground impressively, but both sides walked away worse off than when they started.
FINLAND FOREVER!!!!!!!!!
It's so cool to see the Leopard 2 and the Abrams M1 tanks following each other.
Dude @09:03 was like "I'm rolling up in dis bish without camouflage! Fuggit!" 🤣
He had camo but like 2 branches lol
@@D-Z321 ☠️☠️☠️
Yet the paint color matches the color of the sand perfectly.
If Finns need any more proof that we love you, realize that Tolkien built his whole world around your language.
The best thing about the forest is that when you stop, stay quiet and camouflage, the enemy will eventually come to you. The End. :)
Yes. That's about it.
Those US tanks look amazing! Glad to have you here, visiting Finland. As well, these Finns drive like a proper race car driver. haha.. small pun intended there. Do you know what's the difference between Finland and Russia? We like to build bridges, but, the bad neighbour of ours, likes to destroy them. Slava Ukraini, from Finland, with love. _Samuli
Just keep building bridges and don't mess with the wrong people
We are glad to have your back Finland. Your a great allie
@@jerrybartlett273 - 50% finns again???
Slava to marshal Timoshenko
@@user-zr5yw2st1e what's your point?
seeing that Ranger Joe's protractor at 2:31 gave me flashbacks of Benning
It's great to have NATO partners in Finland to train together with us. Especially US troops, because it annoys the Russian decision-makers a lot.😄😄😄
Glad to have Finland in NATO!
I've never seen that many mosquitos than during this exercise.
😃😃🇫🇮
I wrote this in response to someone asking if they ever train to take trenches, and then it became entirely too long to be just a reply no one reads, so I decided to post this as a general message:
In general, the US and NATO definitely have the discipline, knowledge, and training to execute successful attacks on trench defenses and well-defended emplacements utilizing the study of all past historical conflicts plus daily analysis of current conflicts and trends, including the weapons and tactics used by all sides (think of the Ukraine war as an ongoing graduate-level course with daily classes for thousands of stratefy-minded individuals within US/NATO).
However, option 1 would still be to spend tens of billions in 5th generation and ultimately 6th generation air assets (into the next decade), drones, electronic warfare, air defense, SEAD/DEAD capabilities, and combined arms operations to actively suppress and destroy the enemy air assets, enemy air defenses, and effectively destroy all ground obstacles including trenches before rolling forward. There would be some inevitable losses and MANPADS will always present a threat, although I believe word would travel fast when all such aunches are promptly followed up by a counterattack on the originating grid square turning any launch into an effective suicide mission.
Then the real question becomes: when Russia is absolutely defeated, all of their airfields are out of action and their remaining air assets well behind their borders out of the fight unless tehy want to be shot down, does Russia use nukes still, despite the fact the US has no interest in physically invading Russia? It becomes a serious issue, as their paranoia makes them believe NATO actually wants their largely empty country for unknown reasons or wants to actually kill people of Russian heritage, when in fact, Russia was not on the US's proverbial radar AT ALL until they foolishly decided to attack Ukraine, which about 90% of countries worldwide consider unprovoked and simply wrong.
The answer is “Yes”.
Battle Drill 7
Are we more, or less scared than 1960 or -80s when Nuclear War was close? 🤔
Love for Suomi! The Finnish jaeger brigade!
Finns have some slept on drip and kit 😫💦 what camo pattern is at 7:15? (the guy giving directions at the bridge)
Glad to have Finland in NATO
Natos baltic sector is now 100% secured.
Im really curious what are those circle things in their head gear?
if you get shot by the "enemy" they start beeping meaning you died
It is a simulator for the helmet we also had them on our vests and it regonices when you are shot/wounded
basically a very fancy laser tag gear
That's MILES system, used to simulate real combat training. TNI hasn't standardized such training & doesn't have the equipment
Missa on metsa sauna?
5:47that bridge must be made with the strongest metal.
It's in the design 🙂
"Vähän löysän näköistä". Kieltämättä :D
1:24 just an example but does anyone know why the patch is that big
The patch had to be large enough to be seen through the dust and sand at Fort Bliss,
What is the strap of “lenses” on their helmet?
lenses and glasses work in war exercises with the computer to verify hit accuracy.
Sensors for the training equipment. They have lasers on the guns and those sensors on the helmets to detect hits when they occur. Think of it as fancier laser tag.
@@CorporalCookieyeah a big boy lasertag😂 so much fun
The lenses contain 3 mirrors in a 90 degree formation just like in a safety reflector. It sends the lights back to the laser tag, confirming the hit
Природа красивая.
Finland is a gorgeous country, and the people reflect that as well.
@@Trve_Kvlt thx
Скоро порыбачим и там, если НАТО к нам полезит
Трусы, только Югославию и Ирак бомбить можете
Карелия написано. Граница с Финляндией.
Jenkit saa vähän makua siitä paksusta metsästä mikä meillä täällä Pohjolassa on.
There are Dixies too.
The Finnish forest looks brutal to fight in. We have some very similar terrain all over the US, but fighting in those forests in the Finnish winter would just be condensed suffering.
@@Trve_Kvlt Aye, it's pretty characteristic of this nation. Forests, lakes make it difficult to penetrate, and some parts of it are completely shut off for any kind of vehicle beside maybe a stubborn donkey.
@@ondriiisakan549 I'm afraid we don't have a word for that😂
@@Dev_Six Especially in the wetlands. I went hiking on some pretty rough unmarked trails that I found in Helventinjärvi last summer. Put all my brand new Varusteleka gear to some good work.
Das sieht schön aus 👍
7:39 get my car to sound like that!
ทหารไทยผ่านศึกษานายสอนพลเยี่ยม.รุ่นจ้อพล.ป้อง.นายวิรัตน์พลเยี่ยม.หนว่ย.ทางทีวี.ภาพถ่าย.ดาวเทีวยไทยคม.ของทูยู..หู่มบ้าน.สจ.ส.ส.ภสาผู้แทน.
Those Finnish leos with all the branches and camo
Are these exercises ever about taking a fortified trench position with mines and dragon teeth? would be fun to see how NATO would take those positions that Russia is currently using in Ukraine
Sadly they dont ever show that stuff, all we get to see in the media during any sort of NATO training (even going back years) is some soldiers moving from cover to cover and shooting at something out of view, they never really show any actual tactics or 'cool stuff', they probably have strict rules about whats allowed to be shown.
Realistically, i dont think a trench with some mines and dragon teeth would be any sort of issue, if NATO were to ever rock up to Russian border they would just use a sh*t load of tanks, shoot ground to blow up the mines and blow away half the dragon teeth, drive over the remaining teeth & trench :P Dragon teeth are somewhat effective when theres 1-10 tanks, not when theres 100's. Also i think its safe to assume that recent tanks (like the ones most NATO members use) have mine detection (at least when driving slowly) so they would just be alerted about them before hitting them.
for example, a few B-52s would do the trick
Facilitating the movement of friendly forces is one of the main tasks of combat engineers.
For example the United States has all the tools to make this really easy. I mean as easy as anything can be during war. Relatively straightforward and easy.
The mines for example could be cleared with mine-breaching line charges, plowed aside with plows, detonated with rollers and especially in difficult terrain with demolition charges such as Bangalore torpedoes. Plenty of choice. Those combat engineer units would be protected by mobile air-defense, counter-battery radars and systems like M270 MLRS which allow for incredibly accurate and devastating counterbattery fire.
I'm not even accounting for things such as close air support and ways to bypass enemy defenses.
I was the guy behind the rock on the first clip so I can tell that this exact situation was about coming across some mines on the road so our tanks had to stop and then we came across american troops holding that road on top of this ridge in these exact trenches so we had to stop our tanks and clear the ambush by attacking the trenches
By AIR,, Then we Send Foots on the Ground..
Sights when Running!
I`m happy when Finnish gets the price to enter Nato. Hope Sweden will also be able to enter soon.
From Canada 🇨🇦 welcome to NATO Finland 🇫🇮🔥✌️😎💙🪖
Laukaus, laukaus, sarrrrja!
Kuka tuhlaa valtion panoksia??!!
Hey I was there lol
Что такое понты: 4:02.
reconnaissance and fast movement in the terrain.
Whew, Abrams be looking a little bit thicccc there as that bridge flexes.
That bridge can take 80 tons. Abrams is 70 tons.
@@teroleikkila please highlight where I said the bridge couldn’t take it. I specifically said it flexes when the Abrams crosses over. That’s it. And if you refer to the video, there is clear flexing and creaking. Point being, the Abrams is a big, heavy tank. That’s it, that’s the point. Not sure why you seemed to have missed it.
Yea our girl does have a big ol booty 😂
Much better if the American soldiers learn cold-weather warfare from the Finnish.
I'm pretty sure that's why they're there.
@@HunterDeRiot this training exercise is mostly to enhance interoperability, not specifically to learn or enhance cold-weather warfare capabilities.
They do, the US Marines send future survival course instructors to Finland to be trained by the finns in winter survival tactics every year.
Vähä löysän näköistä.
The Finn with the beard and tight pants, man. He's kinda hot! Lol😅
Pahkajärvi, my old training ground.
When is the US finally gonna commit to the right colour on their armoured vehicles again? xD
I noticed more and more U.S. armored vehicles are starting to get their woodland paint jobs since the focus is now in Europe and the Pacific. I guess it just takes time to get all the existing vehicles over time that came back from the Middle East. Granted, the newer ones in the factory are coming out fresh with the woodland paint.
Yeah its gonna take a while lol
2:50 Shoutout to My Boy
His Makeup Is On fleek
Hope you USA troops enjoyed our forest. Cos we are happy to have you here.
Thank you for having us! I have to say it was quite gorgeous. I enjoyed the time I spent in Finland. The soldiers were very friendly
Good video 👌👌👍👍
Just a few bets away from snagging those top prizes t20 worldcup betting is too thrilling this year
Im from Finland🇫🇮🇫🇮🇫🇮🇫🇮
Yeah, we got Europe's largest artillery and "few" tanks. But we need more long distance missiles and lots of high quality drones. If drones fly over 70m high, you don't see and hear it at all. Those are present day must have equipments.
Hienosti telojenkopina +moottori = Song😊
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
I don't know which side to take cuz i am American and Finn born and raised two different countries
But we are on same side, so...
Your already on the right side they are both your homes!!
If you support LGBT your choice USA
@@SlavaCockrainaU.S Politicians*
@@MorJelly US politicans
Americans and other allies will find out in exercises that all Finns have at least decent English language skills. In Finland television programs ment to adult audience are never dubbed, just subtitled.
Code vision right left operations
Vive les Usa humanitaires démocrates libéraux.
Tälläset pontoonit raakku joelle, niin kyllä kestää moton painon👍
💪
Tervetuloa Suomi!!!
🇺🇸 🇫🇮합동훈련
Russians who support the cock-a-doodle notion of "returning Finland to the Motherland" should watch this video. It will disabuse them of their stupid idea. Finland joining NATO was the smartest thing it did in a century.
i see the US Army still can't afford green paint for its vehicles.
I'm sure they can but they most likely don't choose to
@@jaden18860They actually are repaiting the vehicles, since things are happening back in Europe and the Pacific. It take awhile to repaint these vehicles.
If the gunner doesn't see fire As Buddy
What are he US wearing on their heads?
Sim bands to determine if you're hit or not. There's a laser pointer attached to people's weapons that activates when one shoots. If that beam (the "bullet") hits one of those receiver circles, you're considered dead/wounded.
''2 sided combat simulation system'' basically laser responders. The weapons have the laser system and when ever they shoot blanks, it sends a flash of laser to the direction they're shooting at, in case of hit the simulation system tells you that you're wounded/fatally wounded or such.
it's basically adult laser tag
dude why are american soldiers still using ucp?
For what they are preparing them for, they will have to cross them in white and learn not to make noise in the forest.
Well, the americans are there to lern a few things...
Did you hear about the iPhone 15 Pro Max deal Place 30 live dealer bets and it could be yours I’m going all in
Why all of them are sitting just less than 3 meters apart all the time? Loving each other just too much?
Mvdftip 0:47
So 1st Air Cavalry with Finnish troops. Who are the "op forces"? Those US bradley IFVs are TALL compared to Finnish CV90 IFVs.
And our Abrams looke bigger than the Finns' Leopard 2 tanks. But Ukrainian troops love the Bradley IFVs.
->After days of researching Finland's military situation I feel that ANY (conventional) Russian attack on Finland would result in horrible losses to the Russians. Even a Phyrric victory would be impossible for them.
"Russia used to have the 2nd best army in the world.
Now it has the 2nd best army in Ukraine."
Most likely some other Finnish unit playing the rol of opfor
Usually Finnish troops vs American troops, then both sides have a few men from the other side overseeing, and confirming laser "hits" and "kills", sometimes they mix the troops for interoperability, for Instance American troops working with Finnish fire control etc. Yes the American tanks/APC are bigger. Also, a lot of the times Finnish reservists are participating in these training drills, which is why you see out of shape bearded men with long hair running around, because they just showed up from civilian life for a couple days training.
unfair for the mericans to just use CLU without anyone in the squad even carrying inert training tube for weight, let alone assemble it when need and disassemble, just popping out in the bush with "lightweight" naked clu and calling for mr. referee to "destroy" enemy tanks......
Totally saw that too 😂. Points in general direction fired 😂
If I understand correctly, they do it this way because US Army's current system isn't compatible with Saab's, so the Finnish umpire marks the enemy vehicle as killed. In time, I think the idea that all systems will become compatible with each other.
@@gunnar6674 finns have saab compatible spike lr laser training missiles maybe only 5-10 pieces, almost allways they are unavaileble for war simulation use, but still, for training we have training missiles (have single ccd day seeker and ir optional if pluggin in seperate cooling gas, connections to clu, but obviusly missing all the warheads, flight and launch motors, flight controll surfaces etc, but still weight the realistic 13kg and can be usen to take locks with) also, dummy version exist that have nothing in them, just solid block of wood or fiberglass, has the realistic 13kg weight, carry straps, and the mount to the tripod and clu.. th-cam.com/video/aCmAaPde-2o/w-d-xo.html heres timestamped version of the manpacked version of the spike, finnish atgm squad carries 4 missiles and one clu and tripod, where as american counterparts carry single clu with imaginary missiles in this exersise, and the also the previus arrow21,
@@gunnar6674 Regardless if it's compatible or not, they could still carry an inert training tube for weight and assembly before firing to get proper training in rather than just using a naked CLU. But I guess they just took the easy way out and didn't carry that extra weight or didn't come prepared with inert training tubes for the exercise.
@@gunnar6674 america uses saabs system lol
Yeah, paint jobs are in order.
🦾💪🇫🇮🇺🇲🔥❤️🔥🙏
Army source
Why
Ooh Landmark
@USNavy Dismount
us army helmets ????😮
What? The Finns? Yes we use the same helmets.
If Putin invades Finland play the song Slow Motion by Stein
2 Distinct Volleys
Pahkajärvel tullu treenattuu:)
Приятного аппетита 🍜🧃🍼🍼🥛🥂💌 Любовь 🎎🎇🎇🎇🎇 keep 👍🏾🪖🪖🪖🪖 love use 💯💯💯💯😊😊😊 близким ✅🔰🔰🔰✅👋🏾🥾🥞🍜🍔🥂💌🎧😊😊😊 ‼️‼️‼️‼️ поздравления принял kivi, Kevin мило 💝💝💝💝