ULTIMATE Sony Lens Comparison // Sony 24-70 F2.8 GM II VS Sigma 24-70 VS Tamron 28-75 VS Sony 24-70
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ต.ค. 2024
- Comparing the NEW Sony 24-70mm F2.8 GM II with My FAVORITE F2.8 Zoom Lenses from Sigma, Tamron & Sony
Use this link to get $25 off your PPA membership:
www.ppa.com/jo...
Photos Edited with my Lightroom Phoenix Preset Pack: www.dan-sally....
Download the test Images: bit.ly/3FwlNc0
Sony 24-70 F2.8 GM II Lamborghini Review: • Sony 24-70mm F2.8 GM I...
Tamron 35-150mm F2-F2.8 Review: • Tamron 35-150mm F2-2.8...
Sony A7IV Cinematic Review: • Sony A7IV Hands On Rev...
//- Purchase Options -\\
Sony 24-70mm F2.8 GM II: bhpho.to/3whcCb3
Sony 24-70mm F2.8 GM: bhpho.to/3KWhszV
Sigma 24-70 F2.8 ART: bhpho.to/3wigGb4
Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 G2: bhpho.to/3yFYDwl
ALL My Gear: kit.co/learnin...
BTS Video Camera: bhpho.to/30Wfhat
Gimbal I Used: amzn.to/3joM6qL
My Other Gimbal: amzn.to/3pxASnw
Main Photography Cam: bhpho.to/3xRLqPk
Main Video Cam: bhpho.to/30Wfhat
Dream Cam: bhpho.to/36tDCYV
Best Memory Card: bhpho.to/335rvzS
Our FAVORITE lens ever: bhpho.to/3CSVD0o
All my Photography gear: geni.us/myphotokit
All my Video gear: geni.us/myfilmkit
Literally EVERYTHING I use for video for weddings, youtube videos, and everything else including why I use it and why you should consider it.
| All My Gear |
My music: geni.us/mymusic
My sound FX: geni.us/soundfx
Where I get stock vids: geni.us/stockv...
My next level photo editing software: geni.us/luminar4
My new drone: bhpho.to/3oYXHyw
My ND Filters: bhpho.to/3c0PvJo
Cheaper ND Filters: bhpho.to/3lDed4T
My On Camera Mic: amzn.to/3oVdP3K
My Studio Mic: bhpho.to/3kpflrB
My Wireless Lav Mic: bhpho.to/3wuPrso
Check out my new merch!!!
Appreciate the support and feel free to tag me in it! geni.us/learningcamerasmerch
| Follow ME! |
Hey, I love checking in with you guys, talking gear, meeting up, answering questions, and checking out all the amazing content you have going on.
Facebook: / learningcameras
Dan's Insta: / learningcameras
Twitter: / learningcameras
Which lens is your favorite??? Also, because you checked the comments, get an extra 20% OFF my Lightroom Preset pack using the coupon code: dansfan20
www.dan-sally.com/product-page/phoenix-extended
That 50 1.2 :P
Sigma 24-70.
Sony 24-70 GM II, the best 24-70 out there.
I don't have a Sony camera, so I'm using the SIGMA^^
@@cody_mchardy Haha...still dreaming of buying it
I actually just purchased the GM II, but canceled my order and went with the Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 and also purchased the Sony FE 20mm F1.8 G Full-Frame Large-Aperture Ultra-Wide Angle G Lens. I was able to purchase these two lenses for the same price as the GM II. :)
Totally respectable but sigma isn’t any better than a G master.
@@giancarloarrobarodriguez5291what do you mean by that
I love that 20 G.
Going with Sigma 24-70 over Tamron 28-75 and Sony 24-70 GM, paired on my A7III because of the Image & Build Quality, Versatile Focal Length, price and Value and i'm happy with that. I Have no issue about dusk on the lens. I Love the Sharpness, and this is my go to lens for travel, journalism, wedding and group photography.
Sigma 24-70 F2.8 Art is great.
How's the gyro and active stabilization using the Sigma on Sony mirrorless bodies?
No dust in your Sigma?
@@mattstolzman Sigma fixed the dust issue. I bought the updated version and I haven't had ant dust in my lens. Just makes sure you buy the newer version according to the serial number
@@liljoe23la Thank you
how would i know if it’s new one?
I have been using the Tamron 28-75 for years and love it, Just sold it and got the G2 and have to say the G2 is even better. Sharper at 2.8 and the corners too. I also like the feel of the new build. It is a no brainer. I am trying to wait a little bit to see if they make a G2 17-28mm.
Tampon lol
@@fennellkahlil hahaha
Some other reviewers actually found the Tamron G2 to be better than Sigma in image quality, for instance Dustin Abbott. Also sharper in corners, just not at 75mm. So I'm thinking of buying the Tamron. I've got the 70-180mm and love it so far.
@@bennieferinga9609 It is amazing, you won't be disappointed
@@ekphotography Good to know. It's light weight is also appealing. Thanks for your reply 👍
I just bought Sigma 24-70 f2.8 artlens.
Its an amazing lens with a very good price!
Just bought the Tamron 28-75 g2 and love it
Can't thank you enough for all the information I learnt from this video! Good luck Dan!
Awesome! Appreciate that
Man this is the video I have been waiting for. Thank you Dan !!
Awesome! Appreciate that Jesh
I had the opportunity to try the GM II, sold my sigma Friday and expecting my Sony Monday. Yes the price is more than double but I could tell a difference right away and the weight it’s better
It’s crazy that those couple of things on your table are all together over $10,000 in cost
Ive owned the sony 1st version (was way too expensive), sigma (had huge dust issues) and the tamron G2.
I keep the G2 every Day, in term of weight, price, optical and build quality its a masterpiece.
yeah that sigma dust issue was the difference for me between it and the g2. they seemed to make this a focus point with thier g2 as the g1 also had that same issue
Would u considering upgrading to Sony G2? I've only has a Tamron G1
I am using Sony Zeiss 24-70 lens.
I thought the dust issue got sorted with this newer Sigma DG DN?
Tamron has really bad vignetting and distortion. I bought it just over two months ago and I regret it.
I made the hard choice few months ago and went with the tamron. I don't regret it smaller lighter and very sharp.
I keep thinking about these options and MAN, if the new GM was fully internal zooming at that size, then it could justify the price over the Sigma. I hope more manufacturers focus on internal zoom lenses in the future!
Does any company make an internal zooming 24-70mm? I am not aware of any? Also internally focussing at that size.... pretty sure that breaks physics...
Just saying, that is a detail that would set it apart! I really love internal zooms and wish every lens was haha
@@JohnDennery It would be nice... but I believe it is impossible. The reason that you can do it on a 70-200 is that they are both telephoto focal lengths. The length of the lens is determined by the 200mm range and you are moving a few elements to achieve the 70mm. The problem with a 24-70 is that you are going from somewhat wide, to somewhat tele. I know your first thought is probably "well they are both ~3x zoom there shouldn't be much difference"... but the problem is that optics don't care about mm. They care about field of view angles which is why as companies make faster zooms (or lighter/smaller) they tend to sacrifice the wider end to 28 (in the case of Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 or Canon 28-75mm F2) or 35mm (for the Tamron 35-150mm F2-2.8). The 24-70 goes from ~74 degree field of view to ~29 degree field of view, where-as a 70-200 goes from ~29 to ~10. So a difference in FOV angle on the 24-70 is ~45 compared to ~19 on the 70-200. If you look at your 24-70 when it is at its widest - all the elements are pretty much bunched up and close together at the front of your lens. But notice how close that has to be to the sensor and how little of the front element is actually used at 24mm. Now you have to ask yourself how you can put all those elements there and then focus them much further back now on the sensor without sacrificing the 70mm end. Hopefully this describes the problem well enough to visualize. The 70-200mm is just soo much easier to design to be internal because all the elements are spaced out more in the lens design to hit those focal lengths.
@@MeAMuse Sony has an 18-105mm internal zoom lens, so I feel as if it's possible. But the trade-off might be quality?
@@JohnDenneryk
I own the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN. It is by far the best lens in that category for me. The GM line's too expensive and doesn't give too many advantages over Sigma.
I bought used GM in perfect condition just for £800
@@art_means_artificial but I guess that's the *first* version of the GM, the one without the aperture ring, correct?
How do you feel about the IBS for sigma? I have one as well and love the lens, but it's frustrating that it doesn't work well with the A7Siii Active IBIS
Have no probs WSE with mine, mate! Have it paired with A7III. Cheers!@@BreadCatMarcus
Question, which adapter do I need to get If I want to get the sigma?
I’m looking for a new 24-70 and I think the GM II is the best but I’m going with the Sigma instead. I mostly use primes but I want a zoom for when I don’t want to switch lenses so much and the Sigma seems like the perfect balance between price and quality
Agreed!
I bought GM II and I'm happy how it works with a7RV. For absolutely non commercial use.
Dan I owned the older Sony 24-70mm f2.8 GM and sold it and got the better Sigma Art 24-70mm f2.8 DG DN which I love . At $1099 USD for the Sigma, I see no real reason for me to switch to the superb new Sony 24-70mm f2.8 GM at $2299 USD . The Sigma gives me stunning image quality on my current A1, A7RIV and A7SIII. Yes the Sigma is heavier but I am used to the size and weight and love its quality. FYI, I do currently own 13 E-mount lenses from 10mm to 600mm from Sony, Sigma and Tamron, including some top newer GMs. For all around work this Sigma Art 24-70mm f2.8 DG DN and my Sony 24-105mm f4 G OSS probably get the most use. Full disclosure: I did keep one of my Canon lenses, the Canon TS 17mm f4 Tilt-Shift lens when I moved over to Sony in January 2017 after over 40 years using pro Nikon and Canon gear (both brands). Cheers and thanks for your fine comparison video. You are one of the best, and I share your videos with my many facebook photo groups that I belong to, administer and moderate.
Would you trade a 50 gm for this new 24-70?
@@charruaporelmundo if you want that f1.2 bokeh, no trade. But if you need a more overall versatile lens, yes trade. Cheers
this Video is a enough for lenses comparisons on TH-cam, thanks
Currently using the Tamron 28-75 for weddings & music videos, but currently looking to upgrade to the Sigma.
Incredibly well covered, thank you.
I have the sigma, it's really great, and the dust issues in newer copies have been fixed. if I'm nitpicking I wish it were a tad smaller and lighter, but still not a reason to trade it in. Thanks Dan nice review.
Looking to get one. How do you know if you have the older versions?
If you call the Sigma Corporation customer service 800# they can tell you the serial number of lenses with the updated weather sealing.
I just bought the Tamron. It is so light that I have stopped using all my primes. It's just glued to my camera now. It's solidly weather sealed to boot.
Dan , bought the Tamron 28-75 G2, also have (in that range) the Sony 3r5 1.4 GM and Sigma 50 1.4, both the Sigma and the 35 1.4 are exceptionally great lenses in every category, so, I was curious to see how the G2 fared against these primes, and did a practical test around the home, with practical, I mean, I did not shoot any test charts or other typical testing tools, I wanted to see how they compared on my typical daily use, hand held on my A7IV, at 2.8 opening for all cases, and I concluded that, unless I get to 200 or 300% magnification, I can't see any difference, they all look great. I don't have the Sigma or Sony GM 24-70 to compare , for my non-pro needs, can't justify paying more for either lens, in particular if they are heavier, if you are a pro printing poster size probably this would make sense buying a GM. BTW, I paid $800 for the G2 brand new from B&H, and I am going to try this weekend on gimbal on a family event, I tend to be careful on my back and avoid overloading it, this lens is the right weight on a DJI R3 Mini.
That's awesome! Glad the lens is proving out
Thanks for this video. Very well done, and nice, balanced discussion. It’s pushing me towards the Sigma.
Has anyone ever told you your voice sounds a lot like Edward Norton’s?
Hope your OK with internal dust, I have 2 and both gater dust every few weeks. Have to manually open and clean them
I adore my Tanrom 28-75mm When I was craving some GMs lenses I almost traded it for the first GM 24-70 but glad I didn’t. It’s great for my photography and videosb
Great review bruv! Based on personal experience and feedback from clients I'll be sticking with my 28-75 but I'm not opposed to eventually upgrading. Will you be comparing the GMII to the 35-150? That's the lens I've been contemplating since watching your review.
Nice!!! I actually just made a video on the 35-150 with some comparisons in it! th-cam.com/video/QAGr09qo6nU/w-d-xo.html
We need that Samyang/Rokinon 24-70mm 2.8 review Dan. Just got my A7iv and looking for my first zoom lens.
I was going to go with the Rokinon but I’ve seen several videos with issues of the lens falling apart easily I couldn’t do that all so I went with the Tamron g2
Thanks, Dan!!! I'm looking into a light weight variable zoom. Just wanted to make sure the Tammy was viable before buying.
Absolutely, been using that lens for years and it's great
@@learningcameras perfect!! Thanks. I have all the 1.5 G master stuff (all primes) for my professional work (no this yt channel)… but I think I’ll def pick this up for travel and personal shooting. The smaller/lighter body is a bonus.
So helpful. Completely to the point. Really appreciated this!!
Thanks so much!
My Sigma 24-70 is tack sharp. It’s been hard for me to change from Sigma but i may try out the Sony one day.
I am currently using the Sigma one. Happy with the results.
I appreciate your time and effort making this for us.
Means a lot!
Well thought out assessment. Thank you.
Thank you for doing this exhausting, but extremely interesting comparison. I guess, I’m one of those guys that just got a good deal. I own a Tamron 28-75mm G1 and just picked up a deal at a camera store for a Sony 24-70mm GM1 for $923.00 with shipping. So for me the GM1 was cheaper than the sigma and about the same price as the Tamron G2 and I didn’t think the Sony GM2 was worth the extra $1276.
Yeah, the GM1 has been going crazy low in price. Not sure why other than influencer marketing to the new version. Typically those lenses hold value even when new ones come out
@@learningcameras if used G1 vs sigma new (both nearly same price ) , which one worth ya？🙏
I typically shoot macro and telephoto wildlife, so I haven't even gotten a standard focal length for my Sony system yet. This video will help me decide which to purchase. Thank you so much!
I've had the Sigma, then replaced it with the Tamron because of the size and weight.
The Sigma is an incredible lense, but it's way too big for travel purpose. The Tamron fits in a small camera bag and is so much lighter.
It's indeed less sharp than the Sigma, but you'd have to zoom in really hard to see it.
If you want the best lense for the price, go for the Sigma, it's incredible
is the bokeh of sigma really worse than the tamron?
How about the autofocus between Sigma and Tamron, which faster? I want to buy lenses around 24-75mm to wedding photography and i think take Sigma or Tamron
after trying both the Gen 1 Sony and the Sigma, i learned that I liked shooting on primes more and sold both 😅.
I don't get excited by 24-70mm lenses. But, I have ordered the new 24-70mm GM II, having sold the old model a few years ago. Since then I've used primes to cover the focal range.
Canon EF 24-70 2.8 II with MC-11. Best optical and build quality. If you moved from Canon to Sony, and have this lens, you are set.
Comparing the sigma 24-70 art ii with the original Sony 24-70 GM i which one would you go with?
I would go with the Sigma 24-70: th-cam.com/video/PDmauI-IBVQ/w-d-xo.html
I think it's a better lens overall, smaller, and cheaper in most cases
bought a Tamron 28 75 G2 when I bought a Sony A7iv. I was moving rom Olympus micro four third so want to keep weight and price down . very happy with the combo. though. we do not always need the best of the best as prosumers
I have the Sigma 24-70. It was just too hard to justify the Sony G1... and the G2 was not out. The other downside to the Sigma which not enough people mention is that it zooms the wrong way. I personally find it really annoying that my other 3 Sony zooms go one way and this goes the other. You catch yourself out and zoom the wrong way.
i have a sigma lens as well (100-400) and really hate this. dont know how sigma decided to do that. not using it very much just because of that.
How's the gyro and active stabilization on your Sony cams with the Sigma 24-70 2.8 art?
@@coolpras26 Its fine. It is obviously not going to be as good as the G2 24-70 from Sony because that has liinear focus motors.... but it is roughly the same as the G1...
@@MeAMuse How's the lens overall? I'm thinking of going for it along with the A7 mark 4 that I'm considering. The G master mark 2 is just too expensive and the difference doesn't justify the price difference.
@@MeAMuse 1 more question. A lot of people have complained about the poor sealing and dust issues as a result in the Signma 24-70 art. Do you face it? It seems the new models (post serial number 5504xxxx) do not have it.
I will be using the sigma 24-70 for the first time at a wedding today (photography). I have been using the Tamron MKi and waited to see what the Sony MKii was like. For wedding photography I found it hard to justify the extra money for the Sony. I can get the Sony 35mm F1.4 GM along with the Sigma and still have a little change left over. I was hoping for a F2 from Sony, now that would have made me hit the buy button. I have been blown away by my Sigma 85 f1.4 so I thought the Sigma 24-70 is worth a try.
How did you get on?
@@Alex-ps5ok it was not for me so I now have the 24-70 gm mkii. I’m shooting 8-9 weddings a month so I may as well spend it or the tax man will take it 😃
@@nickwilliams7867 you'll be happy with the lighter lens
Thanks for the complete information, really appreciate!
Is there a more scientific review that states that the Tamron G2 is behind the Sigma and the older Sony lens, regarding corner sharpness? I didn't find one.
The Sony is nice having tested it - but at an EXTREME premium (not in terms of 1st party 24-70mm 2.8s. Nikons 24-70mm 2.8 F mount forever was similarly priced - even 10 years ago - forget current market value with inflation.) Its just that in the past the third party lenses just weren't nearly on par, and were def "budget" in every penny. This has changed somewhat. The Sigma 24-70mm being overall better than the GM M1 version of the Sony lens at half the cost. I think its harder now to justify the GM2 when it comes to overall (with COST being the major factor.). Cost not an issue? Go with the GM2 hands down. Its the most refined of the bunch. But the oddity here now is that the Sigma is not far behind, and if cost is of even modest concern its HANDS down the winner - mainly in the trade off of weight and balance vs the GM2, aperture ring, and buttons. I personally LOVE an aperture ring. Never use the buttons on the GM lenses. I did like the size and balance of the GM 2. At the end of the day though - It was hard to justify the cost (trust me, easy to talk myself INTO justifying the cost - but in reallity when looking at the bank account just couldn't - having owned and used both lenses). But that's me, I have to live on a budget, and my days of spending and talking myself into it have changed. I'm still creative amazing images with either lens - with the Sigma - I get to have a bit less stress and perhaps a nicer vacation of life event to put that extra cash to.
I got a used Sony 24-70 GM for $1400. Sigma don't support 20fps on Sony a9, and some reviews show that it is a little slower to autofocus than the GM, and the autofocus is critical for me. Will I upgrade to GM II? No, since I love primes and would better buy something like the new 85 1.2 GM. If I owned a higher resolution a1, I would probably upgrade though.
watching your clip... I choose Sony 24-70 F2.8 GM II even though it's expensive for my job. Thanks
Got my Tamron G2 for $715. I only need it for video. I would like the GM II but it's too expensive for me. I have 35mm 1.4 GM and I am waiting for the 85mm 1.2 GM.
Actually in my country (Australia) there will be no contest Sigma wins here, the price difference is the deciding factor. The GM2 is about $2500 and Sigma $1500 (Australian dollar). Samyang 24-70 F2.8 is less than half the price at $1175. We are paying too much Sony tax on Sony lenses.
Great video as always!
Thanks Ricky
I own the Sigma Art, at the moment I can’t see me upgrading to the GM MKII despite it being the better lens in every way.
Its an update to the 85mm GM that will be my next purchase. Nice work on this comparison though :-)
You solidified my choice! Thanks
Great info. Wondering which focus mode and focus area you recommend to make use of the focusing speed of the newest lens?
I have both 35/150&28/75 tamron g2 love that combo forget the sony g2
I’m literally torn between the Sigma 24-70 and Tamron 28-75. I almost went with Tamron recently, and even talked to a couple who uses Tamron lenses. They said they liked their Tamrons and would recommend me getting that over Sigma if I was on a budget, but then said Sigma was slightly sharper and had slightly faster AF.
For me, I primarily do videography and I just want a 2.8 lens for videography, and I have a Glidecam that I use sometimes, as well as a Ronin S (I barely used so far). I rented both a Tamron and Sigma before and I used Sigma on my Glidecam, and it was clunkier, heavier and kinda close to my Glidecam pressure plate, which is my concern.
I have both
I would say Sigma is the king when it comes to photography.
But if you just need video, I'd actually say the tamron 28-75mm is a better choice.
Its much Lighter for example.
Has more pleasing bokeh
Has better continues AF as far as i can tell than sigma.
Everything that is better on the Sigma is geard towards photography.
@@meladkareme5851 i just need for photography but i dont know if i should give 500$ more to get the sigma over the tamron :/
I heard Sigma has dust issues
I wish someonte talked about stabilization for videos.
Would more depend on your camera
Currently, at least in Europe, the price difference between GM and GM II is absolutely insane! 1450 Euros for the GM on sale versus 2399 for the GM II.
I have Sony A7R3-A with Sigma 24-70 F2.8 DN almost year now. It's great combo when taken pictures on days and some nights. Also, I didn't know lens could take some macro pictures
I’d say for casual users and very focused on weight get Tamron. Advanced amateur and most people get the Sigma. If you find a sale on the GM 1 under 800 then maybe consider that one. And for high paid professionals the GM2.
I just bought the Sigma, but if I have money, would get the GM II in a heartbeat. I considered Tamron 28 but the 28mm is the breaking factor. Maybe in the future.
I got the Sigma. Good enough for me. just got the Sony A7iv. I'm coming from The Nikon D70. I know its old but I'm still getting good images from that camera.
Honestly still using the kit 28 -70 3.5/5.5, trying to pick one
I just bought the original Sony 24-70 GM I lens and thought i would regret it but for $1200 brand new I think it was a worth purchase. Although the GM II wouldve have been preferred, with the money I saved I will use it to purchase maybe a nice wide prime lens.
Man i dropped 2300 for it two years ago. Now it’s a lot cheaper 😢
Yo the prices for GM1 are down, seen them sell for 800-900
They are built to last, just makes sense
Thank you!
I had the 28-75 for years and it's more than adequate. I would love to try the 35-150mm, it looks amazing. I find I don't hit the wide end as often so it sounds appealing. That being said, I have just bought the Sony 24-70mm f/2.8 mark II and I have to say that the quality and weight is perfect for me since I carry my camera everyday and I hike to get photos. My vote goes to the Sony mark II but I bet the 35-150mm would end up being my second choice.
PS: the zoom tension switch is really good for getting a hold after framing on a tripod and then repositioning; it holds your original zoom to make reframing fast. I didn't try it for video yet but honestly this is not my first video lens for run and gun, I typically use a Sigma 40mm prime (the photo version but it has cine like quality).
I found the tamron for 500 buck. I've shot the Sony mii but can't justify the price right now. What are your thoughts? I also want that 35-150 I'm just saving up for it.
@@thesisunatorpodcast6850 The tamron 28-75mm is really good at full price, for $500 it is a no brainer. I used it for years before getting the new Sony GM. Enjoy!
so glad i procrastinated researching this last week only to find this video today
Measuring or rather rating flare is like saying which color is the best.
7:22 The Sigma clearly looks sharper, more detail, clearer on this scene. I don't know why this is the case.
But at 7:57 The Sony 24-70 F2.8 GM II is a clear win, much sharper, detailed. The Sigma had purple, blue fringing. While 24-70 F2.8 GM II did not
7:09 Tamron looked bad in comparison, looked ut of focus, blurry, lacks detail.
8:42 You are right, I too see what you are talking about her,e the Bokeh is clearly better on the Tamron. While 24-70 F2.8 GM II looks more textured, almost like fingerprints.
Have the sigma - don’t mind the difference in weight and on a7 iv, no reason for dumping extra $$$$.
Isn’t sigma has a dust issue? Or improve in this lens…
I found review that after 1 month dust appear in sigma.
All time when i hear "Tamron just a little behind a Sigma, image for me is totally opposite, Tamron is sharper than Sigma on center. Almost all time. So its personal preference or just missfocus?
Definitely the Sony 24-70mm f 2.8 G Master, for all genres.
Nice video but you left out the much smaller Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8 DG DN Contemporary that is only 470 grams. Why? I had the V1 but also bought the tiny Sigma for walking around and it’s great for that.
I just don't happen to have that lens and didn't have a good way to get it without buying it... And I already have WAY too many lenses in that category lol
Since you're throwing the Tamron in the comparison, why not also add the 28-70 Sigma?
I don't have that one yet but I absolutely should
Hello, Great review for photography.
How is the Tamron 28-75 g2 for video? I film with the sony 7s3
I cannot find a good review about it
Thanks a lot
Go watch the review that "Dunna did it" made. It's an excellent showcase of that lens for video.
Huge, biased fan of the 28-75 G2 but I honestly use the Tamron 35-150 f/2-2.8 as my daily. It's a remarkable piece of kit that I've needed all my life.
you've gotten to shoot with the g2 and still find you're grabbing the 35-150? I"m thinking the new holy trinity is the 16-35 PZ and the tamron
@@equal___ the image quality of both lenses is superb so no complaints, there. It's the versatility AND the image quality of the 35-150 l, combined, that continues to spark joy.
I’m I have the Tamron 28-75 gen 1 and the Sigma 24-70 - the Sigma is actually significantly faster autofocus, and much sharper image than my Tamron.
I have the G2 and in daylight the af is instantaneous to the point that you can't see it acquiring focus
@@vincenzodellama7158 yeah same. The G2 is overall better than the sigma, I had both.
I had the G1 Tamron for a year and half and now I have the G2 for half of year, the G2 is just awsome ! It focuses noticebly better than the G1, rarely misses focus, eye af is way better even with my old RIII(I also have a a7IV) and also the G2 is sharper at tle long end and in the corners than the old model and has nicer build quality, evaugh even for professionals(I still wish it had 24mm and a af/mf and a focus limiter switches..., but for the money is ok ! ) .
What about the Samyang 24-70 2.8 ??
I use the sigma 24-70 👌
Wish the dust issue was a factor in your video. Sick of having to open my lens and clean it!...
TAMARON 24/70 2.8. Is. My. BEAST. But I love. 50 1.8
The corner sharpness test is totally DIFFERENT from my experience. From my test, tamron 28-75 G2 is much much much SHARPER than the old GM 2470.
How's the gyro stabilization nad active stabilization using the sigma and tamron?
How about dust issue of Sigma 24-70 now?
you should have compared with new tamron 17-28 g2. Please review also the tamron 20-40
Had Tamron 28-75 mk1 for years and recently changed to GM mk1, oh boy...
In fact, i was lucky enough to buy it second hand (but new, not a single mark on it, still untouched in the box) for the price of Tamron G2. (800€)... wasn't thinking too long.... :)
So, compared to T mk1 its night and day (although i give all credits to Tammy) GM is like a different league.
But, if i had to pay 1400-1500€ for second hand GM mk1 (average prices in Ireland) i would go with T G2 no doubt (size matters 😉)
That was a great review! | would like to ask you which should i buy? Tamron 36-150 f/2 - 2,8 or should i pick sigma 24-70 f/2,8? Both are great lenses i know that but it's also both too expensive. With tamron i take advantage the low range of 35 and also the beast range of 150 but with sigma i have something more standard with 24 to 70 where i cover the low range of 24. I want it for travelling.I have the Sony A7 II. Thank you
Thanks! Sorry for the late reply. The 35-150 is a heavy lens so I don't use it a ton but when I do, I absolutely love it. It has the quality of a prime lens with the flexibility of a zoom and just looks amazing. I would use the Sigma 24-70 if you want an every day lens you can use for anything and still have good quality and especially go with the 24-70 if you are traveling because I think you will get frustrated with the 35-150
Hey man, did you notice a difference in colors? Don't know if it's me but the sigma seems to have a slight greenish hue.
Great comparison! Is there any difference with Standard/Active Steadyshot when using the A1/siii? Interested is a handheld stability test
Thanks! There shouldn't be. It would be interesting if Sony were to have more lenses with built in lens stabilization if that combined with active IBIS could make Sony lenses better for handheld shooting
You should of add the Sam yang as well your review.
Hello I just bought the 24-70 gm ii and I have the tamron g2 for 6 month and omg the tamron on is much more sharper than the gm I don't know why but when I zoom 100% the difference is hard
Thanks for the detailed comparison! I’ll get the Sony 2470gmii because it is lighter than the sigma and has an aperture ring. I’m tempted for the tamron because it is the lightest but 28mm is somewhat limiting because I don’t have any ultra wide angle lenses.
If 28mm is not wide enough for you, 24mm definitely won't be either.
You are paying a HUGE price for 4mm difference, 155g heavier & bigger lens (GM II).
I've used the 1st Gen 24-70 GM, own the Samyang/Rokinon 24-70 and been using Tamron 28-75 G2 for a few days now.
Tamron is easily the best out of them all because of the sharpness, size, weight & bokeh quality.
I would 100% recommend Tamron G2 and you can also get a wide angle zoom lens alongside it if you really really need to go wider than 28mm.
For me personally, 28mm is enough in most circumstances.
Worse case scenario you move back 2-3 steps when possible.
@@paiman_ thanks for the suggestions. Tamron G2 + Sony 20mm F1.8 (or any 20mm from the 3rd party) might be a good pairing. I can always crop 20mm for the 24mm look.
@@KeeeeenW No worries.
For less of the price of 1 GM II, you can get this G2 lens and a wide angle zoom lens AND save some money on top it since 2 lenses will still be cheaper than Sony GM II.
And yes, you can always crop in but I would recommend Tamron 17-28mm.
Goes perfect with their 28-75.
So you have the perfect zoom range of 17-75mm.
@@paiman_ I don’t really like zoom lens. I feel like they offer too many focal lengths. I prefer to work with one focal length at a time. I just need one standard zoom for events or landscape. I usually just bring a 35mm for travel or portraits.
I have the Sigma 24-70 Art, which I use for professional portraits and event photography. I considered the Tamron 28-75 G2 instead for the weight savings when traveling and not much compromise in IQ. However, I kind of like a big impressive lens that gives the best quality for the money when doing pro work. For personal travel, I've added the incredibly lightweight and versatile Tamron 28-200, and I leave the Sigma at home. :)
What about dust issues on the sigma
24 70 do i need to worry ?
If it’s newer then 2020 no
The Sony 24 - 70mm f/2.8 GM2 is still the best despite the latest Sigma 24 - 70 Mk2. The build quality and focal range of the Tamron has a lot t be disired eventhough it is much cheaper. You get what you paid for.
is there anywhere i can see a comparison between the Sony 24-70 GM ii and the sony 28-60mm 4-5.6 kit lens? i have been trying to find videos/posts that clearly show the difference in video and image quality of the same subjects, but i can't find it. i need to see what i would be upgrading to if i got the 24-70 gm ii, i have the kit lens, for my Sony A7Cii
Christopher Frost.. he does lens reviews, shoots the same chart with all lenses.. although since the 28-60 is an older lens, i'm not sure whether the chart would be the same.. Still, he is pretty consistent with the format of his reviews.
Now my 2 cents.. even the Tamron 28-75 would vastly outperform the sony 28-60mm 4-5.6 kit lens let alone the GM ii
07:20 why you can see the text on the lens way back on the Art and it is blurry on the GM II? As if the GM II has more bokeh or something..
Probably not the same focus distance
Hey Dan. Did you do this review using the new 28-75 Tamron G2?
Yes, this was the latest G2 version
@@learningcameras I would like to point out that you mentioned that the G2 lense has no buttons. That is not only incorrect, but is actually the most versatile because of the tamron software, you can customize the button and the focus ring.
Hi Dan, thank you for the great review! Question, what longer zoom lens do you recommend as a companion to this lens?
Thanks! So either the Sigma 35-150mm F2-2.8 or the Sony 70-200mm F2.8 GM II are great