It's just too bad Tom Clancy's name's been dragged for the dirt and crap because of Ubisoft. He's got to love how to keep shitting out crap games with his name on it. Rest in peace
"Kill or capture the target but remember we want him alive" So, i can only kill him in a non leathal way that leaves the now dead person still alive? Ok then...
it means that they want him alive, but if you can't capture him, kill him, it's not like we can't capture him and we are being ambushed, ok let's let him go free then
I love these videos so much lmao Nothing like playing through a story, thinking it was fine and then coming here to watch Dartigan carefully explain to you why it made no sense
-“Alright, we can get a lot of content and action from this.” -“Yeah, it will be a fulfilling five minutes.” -“Really? If it’s that short, can we at least combine it with previous short mission and make room for a mission to fill in the plot holes?” -“No.”
9:00 Thank you for bringing this up. It annoyed me to no end when they said it was illegal to hold him despite the insane amount of laws he had broken up to that point.
Honestly I was expecting the CIA lady to be the shepherd this time around. She kept feeding them all the info needed and was captured but not killed and suddenly after she’s captured she knows that the Russians are supplying the Iranians? I thought for sure she was getting set up to be the traitor
@@HiroOfLegend nah, this time it isnt because of current year standards. Its purely because there was a preexisting expectation for General Shepherd to be a traitor. Even though Laswell would’ve been way more unexpected and personal, it never crossed the writers collective mind.
@@louie97ation Or have both of them be traitors, but for different factions. Sheppard is Ollie Northing it up while CIA lady wo4ks for.....say Mararkov or sometjig.
Yeah but it was expressly stated that he went back to not Afghanistan with the rest of not Al-Qaeda after the events of the Warzone storyline. Yet here he isn’t even mentioned and the role of not Al-Qaeda leader is taken up by some random Iranian officer instead for some reason.
I’d like to point out that the ending of MW2019 wasn’t actually the end of the storyline, because Warzone culminated in the assassination of Victor Zakhaev And then they decided not to mention any of that, probably because it ended with a zombie outbreak and the nuclear destruction of Verdansk. They apparently thought this was insane enough to allow it to be canon, but not enough to be mentioned in the sequel
This is why you don't make multiplayer battle royales be canon to the main game. Because nobody can replay it and they have to watch some youtuber summarize the whole thing.
The zombies and the nuke weren't canon. That was an event that led to the next battle royal map. The MW2019 story ended with zakaev falling down the silo.
Victor could’ve been a good main villain for a sequel. But I guess it’s cool not even seeing him while shooting a bunch of respawning enemies in a match where nobody’s even thinking about storylines.
saying its hard to tell the difference between Mexican SF in plain clothes with plate carriers and military weapons isnt really a bigoted statement considdering the cartels have military hardware and are seen with it on a regular basis in Mexico
Was really puzzled when Ghost brought out the whole bag of skull masks. Does he carry that same bag wherever he goes to? Or did they have time to stop by a shop in some war-torn Mexico to buy those masks? I was trying real hard to figure out what long range missile was that. Still got no clue why America's own missile defense system won't be able to shoot it down since it wasn't hypersonic..
I have to say, the character models, especially the faces, are the nearest to realism I‘ve ever seen in a videogame. In some scenes, depending on the lighting, it actually looked like a real actor being recorded. That‘s insane. I never play COD, but their graphics have come far.
That is fine and all but they invested so much into that, they forgot to pay for a decent script writer. Their script must a kid who has watched too many "attack on america" fictions 😂
@@ankandey3614 I'm not saying the game is great or that graphics like that are most important. I was just stating that the graphics are insane. I have no idea of the writing or gameplay, cause I don't play CoD.
well we can agree the biggest problem of MW2 is the lack of logic between the geopolitical implications of our characters actions and that most of the game is set in friendly countries to the US, To me the biggest dissapointment i have with the plot was, why let Hassan go, is "ilegal" five minutes ago i bombed the shit out of my own country don't give me that crap
Wasn't the AC130 mission in Mexico against a cartel? That's vastly different compared to holding a POW who you don't have hard proof against other than your soldiers saw them with terrorists, which is not hard evidence
@@soupgirl1871 even if is against a Cartel, the Mexican goverment should know, now the game doesn't give the impression many Mx Gvt officials know anything
@@rincontibio7664 I mean, we were also working with Fuerzas Especialez. The Mexican Special Forces. I highly doubt they would be if this was a case of the US deciding to send a PMC without Mexico even knowing
@@soupgirl1871 maybe but if we pay attention they never mention any other mx official knewing about and Los Vaqueros look liked an indepedent unit from the regular chain of command, even so, i don't think Mexico was willing to leave a private owned AC-130 to wreck havoc in a town they still, at least of the paper, control
Why is CIA tasking British SAS Opretors to do their work? Shouldn't CIA be sending Delta Force or SEALs or someone else? It is a big plot hole to show Soap, Ghost and Price in the game.
The new 141 makes no sense. In the original it was a large group of highly skilled soldiers from different nations put together by Shephard. Not just a small squad of British SAS chosen by price.
I would like to make a special mention to that last mission for failing to notify you that you're suppose to get shot by Hassan. Can't tell you how many times I restarted my checkpoint because I thought I messed up on the takedown.
Why would it notify you? That takes away the suprise element? If it came up with a pop up menu saying relax, youre supposed to get shot it takes away from the drama of the story.
@@XalphosaurX Funny, I don't recall the surprise element being taken away when you got the "Objective Failed" in MW3 when Makarov opened the helicopter door.
@@shadow200343The objective didn’t fail. They stopped the missile and even if Soap got killed they would’ve had Hassan trapped anyways so they still would’ve killed him.
one major thing for me is how it doesn't get close to the edge anymore it doesn't make you question stuff. I think a big one with a lot of this stuff now is just they're to afraid to make those kinda moves with call of duty, even though they're about the brutality of war like in mw3, you see a child get killed by a chemical gas bomb, its there to make a point, considering the game is about terrorism etc among other things bit weird to dial it back the game just doens't really make sense stuff just happens theres no build, you know immediatly shephard is the bad right out the gate, they don't skirt on the edge anymore its playing it safe even with the story its just ehh
Bro tf are you talking about, in MW2019 there’s dead kids from Russian gas, terrorists shooting kids in the embassy, price and gaz using the butcher’s wife and kid as hostages, and this is only talking about stuff that involves kids 💀
On top of that they don’t even want to kill anyone one, a big part of mw2 was the shocking betrayal of Shepard with the death of Ghost and Roach, it motivated you to go after him but in this not even a side character like Rodolfo can be killed off
In the end of the first remake we find out the new villain is victor Zakheav, he gets killed off in Warzone, Al-Asad is revealed to still be at large, he never appeared since his introduction, he came out as an operator, but that's it. Why build up a big character, and not have them in the sequel?
@@asrieldreemurrthebestestbo1716 that part will always urk me. They could’ve replaced Hassan and had it be Al-Assad and it wouldn’t change anything really, or at least have him be the general that gets bombed. They kinda just left him in Limbo and he’s probably gonna play a part in MW3 but the lack of even a mention of him is just terrible writing
You know, it really irks me when Modern Military games get weapons completely wrong, in a "we didn't even Google search what this is or what it does" kind of way. It would be like if the next FIFA game had Tom Brady on the US team, just because that's a recognizable "sports" name. Like, "ballistic missiles with homing targeting devices" and "the top secret super chemical weapon, chlorine gas". JFC.
Bc Canada couldn't even invade Greenland if they wanted to, have you seen a typical 21st century Canadian lately? Not to mention thier military has been depleted to the bare minimum completely unable to do anything militarily other than tag along with the US as they go invade whatever the next target is.
To be fair, it is a reboot and not a remake. Does that change anything about how soulless this game is? No. Is it almost worse since the developers couldn't be bothered to stick to what even made the original appealing in the first place? Yes.
Ghost's redesign is pretty bad too. The original was simple and realistic: Just a regular guy with sunglasses and a skull scarf. The redesign looks like a tryhard cosplayer on Halloween
I mean.... i guess if I had selective hearing, I'd have the same opinion as you. because theres shit ton of personal opinions in this video. but i guess it's lovely to be able to completely ignore that when said opinion is presented with a facade of objectivity and professionalism
Another game sin: Instead of letting Price & the rest of the 141 handle the mission in Chicago, Laswell should've used Delta Force instead since they have the same skills as Price's team.
So hiding in shipping containers is actually very smart. Alot easier to transport, can include all the electronics needed for remote launch alot harder to identify as a missle PLUS do you have any idea how many shipping containers enter and exit the US on a daily basis. It would be near impossible to check each and every one. Also its AC-130; the C-130 is just the transport version of the aircraft (no guns). Btw love your content just had to me tion those things from early in video
There is already a russian container-launched missile called the club-k and the chinese are working on their own called the YJ-18C, the US developing or having a system of their own isn't a particularly wild idea.
Shadow Company's betrayal is the dumbest story beat in this game. 141 had NO evidence nor had any idea that Shadow Company delivered the missiles, so turning on 141 actually did more harm than good. Also, the scene itself might be the dumbest thing I've seen in a COD game. Graves is just like: "Hey, this is my base now. Me and my PMC are just going to take this base and DETAIN the Mexican Special Forces inside for NO REASON." Who writes this shit?
*8:07 actually, if I may, while operating in Mexican airspace most likely would be illegal, the obtaining of the gunship could happen. So you see, there are C-130s being privately sold and operated, so Shadow Company couldve bought a C-130, somehow obtain a 40mm bofors, 25mm and 105mm howitzer and rig it on, and obtain other essential gear. It’s unlikely, but it could happen
Still messed up on some. It’s an AC-130 gunship not a C-130 gunship. Even then it’s not even based off a C-130 hull so idk what that thing is actually supposed to be.
One thing I should say, is that this isn't a remake. Not in any sense of the word. This has been clarified by Infinity Ward several times when 2019's Modern Warfare was coming out, that this is a reboot. A completely new story, separate from the original aside from characters and a few rewritten story beats.
I only completed the campaign for the skins and tokens lol. It really wasn't that notable to me to be honest aside from the occasional quirk. I also noticed that the campaign difficulty was a massive increase from previous titles.
2:30 the villian wasn't written out they just decided to tie up the plotline in fucking warzone of all things. the first six season endings are about that plot.
The inclusion of Blackwater, sorry, Shadow Company and Wagner, sorry, Russian ultra-nationalist PMCs whose names are so forgettable, I can't remember their name of the top of my head, makes me think they're going to go for a not-Blackwater vs not-Wagner mission in the next game.
I am not going to defend CoD in anyway but I just want to nuance the opening of the video for anyone that hasn't played this game, or the old ones. MW2 2022 isn't a remake, it's a reboot, and the plot is indeed very different but it follows the exact same development as the OG MW2, taking you to comparable locations, with similar objectives. There already is a remaster of the original campaign out there.
In real life, they would have tortured the Iranian AND the narco chick for DAYS. They would have extracted all the info they could have possibly needed from them before making them "disappear". But it's 2022. Everything has to be PC and watered down lol. Which is why they didn't have the guts to make "No Russian" a playable level again! This game's campaign is a joke.
This game is literally the movie Act of Valor just with a shady pic, a general that betrayed his country, Irish guys, Brits, and ballistic missiles not explosive vests. Hell even the guy that voices Alejandro in this game sounds like the guy who lead the Mexican special forces in the movie and looks like that actor if he grew his hair out.
6:20 If we're gonna get really technical, there's also Soap and Yuri from back in MW3, so that's not the case. It's just that unlike older IW, the current writers can't bring themselves to actually off any of the protagonists.
For Laswell not getting help, they offer to help her but don’t shoot because they don’t wanna shoot her. It’s literally the first dialogue in that cut scene. At least do the research
7:20 you do this every so often in your sin videos and i never understood it. Why can’t Alejandro be here? He helps diversify the already boring cast. Its not even trying hard to make the story more palletable. It’s just adding a character who can represent the good side of the conflict that also ADDS to the story which Alejandro does since he’s a big part of this dry ass plot
Cast isn’t boring (in my opinion), but it is a bit odd that TF141 is solely comprised of Brits and Scotsman. Farah doesn’t really count because she’s leading an army and Alex is “dead.” Adding Alejandro was fine.
@@kingkocoa4467 I wouldn’t say they’re boring, I guess that’s a bad description of how I actually feel. I think they’re very dry, they have fun surface level personalities but not much beyond that so I guess dry
I know the video can’t cover all the sins so it won’t be too long, so here’s some more sins that did not get put in. - driving through a cartel held town in a convoy of 3 identical black SUVs thinking the cartel would not be tipped off. - the random times the operators will decide to wear or not wear a helmet. Bullets, shrapnel, and even rocks can kill if they hit somebody in the head. Helmets help prevent that. - graves massacres an entire town looking for Hassan and cleaning out the cartel without intervention by the Mexican army, which is according to the game on the cartel’s payroll - That convoy was ridiculously long - Hassan took over a building and has hostages. The jurisdiction for that incident would not be the military, CIA, and British SAS. US marines are brought in the game to help clear the building. In reality the FBI would be taking point. The FBI’s Hostage Rescue Team, Chicago SWAT, and other police units would be taking point. -how did the CIA cover up a hostage taking in a building and a missile launch from Chicago. Chicago’s violence levels are bad, but it’s not cruise missile bad
Probably why he stated it’s like sports game, because it’s true. They can change up whatever fucking setting they want to for a certain quota, but they’ll never escape the mediocrity plaguing the series after Cold War dropped.
Dartigan's videos are very much like cocaine to me without the side effects, they are adictive as fuck and make me want more and more. Another great video as always
Great video, but I’d make to make a correction. The cop didn’t mean it to sound bigoted. In low light, at night, one man armed with an assault rifle and wearing a tactical vest, and the other wearing just a plain hoodie while waving around a handgun, in an area where the cartel operate can confuse any cop. I’d like you to make that call yourself in their shoes, especially after getting calls that cartel members and a terrorist have crossed the border and are now breaking and entering into people’s homes (probably assaulting some here or there). You’d probably do the exact same thing, keeping guns trained and barking orders until they are close enough to realize they are MSF and/or until you hear them explain their mission thereby matching a tip you received from a CIA agent. You turned that more political than it actually was. How about ding the cops for foolishly cuddling around rather than keeping eyes out for, you know, the fucking terrorist and cartel that are being chased down by said MSF they’ve just interrupted. Also, Gomez is a Hispanic name, so the one cuffing Al would have to be considered bigoted by your logic since he did so quickly and assertively. Ay di-s mío.
You know a game has some bad logic when someone like me can predict half the sins in a video After watching this, MW2 2022 campaign looks dumber/more ridiculous than MW2 Original............ And that game involved jumping a snowmobile to a LZ located across a 100m Canyon
I don’t understand the “bigoted” comment about that cop’s quote. They have cartel members from Mexico firing at people in the street, and two clearly Hispanic males with rifles and body armor are seen in the road. Is that not hard to tell the difference? Would you somehow make the assumption that Hispanic men with body armor and military-grade firearms walking down the street without jurisdiction to be there aren’t cartel? That’s not bigoted, it makes sense. I didn’t expect this video to be so overtly ignorant about “racism”. You should do some research into real life Mexican cartels. They do the exact things seen in this game to snitches. This isn’t some “racist American viewpoint”. Why would the developers include so many Mexican allied troops in the game and literally have you play as Mexican Special Forces if they didn’t like Mexicans?
Some other gripes i have with the game and i want to mention is that for one, the redesigns of shepherd and ghost suck. As you said, ghost is an edgelord and he is (plus i think he looks ridiculous with that mask while not wearing a helmet. Makes his face look small by comparison) and shepherd looks like any basic old man general rather than having a distinct look. Thank you for also mentioning the complete disregard for Zakhaev last game. I was originally under the impression that it was a prequel not a reboot, and then learning that THIS is what they’re rebooting it to brings up my other point. The plot line of this series has potential. But it’s screwed by the fact that Activision instead wants to name drop old characters and ruin a great trilogy. This series legit could have been like a continuation of the previous trilogy, with the antagonists such as Al Quatala, barkov, hassan, and graves all being vastly different than antagonists seen before (plus, these take place in 2019-2022, whereas the others were 2011-2017. So it could have absolutely been a continuation.) Another thing that ruins this for me is that Gaz, soap, and ghost have no real distinction to be gaz, soap, and ghost by name. Gaz could have stayed Kyle Garrick only and be his own character. This game in particular makes me feel like there’s no reason to have ghost and soap of the 141 involved other than “iT’S GhOsT aND SOaP FroM ThE 141” Their places could have been replaced with american soldiers because they have more reason to be directly involved with the main conflict due to it being in mexico/the US. (You know what character who is NOT confirmed dead that i would actually love to see in place of Ghost? Derek. “Frost”. Westbrook. Wouldve made much more sense to me) Graves betraying could have been interesting if he ran a different merc company and maybe did so of his own accord instead of rehashing the shepherd betrayal and making it incredibly obvious…. …. Wow, I actually wrote way more than i thought i would. But i think my point is made that this game could have been less annoying if it was its own story and not just a carbon copy of an iconic series.
I like it that he sinned the killing of an Iranian general. Im surprised you didn’t mention the US actually killed a top Iranian general in a drone strike in Afghanistan a few years ago.
"A completely different plot, which makes for a very poor remake" it's not a remake, it's a reboot. Meaning you take the original characters, a more or less similar context, and you make a completely new story.
i actually dont think the cops were that bigoted.. like, theyre saying it was hard at first glance to differentiate the *good* armed mexicans illegally entering the united states from the *bad* armed mexicans illegally entering the united states. Not reaaally that bigoted if you take like 1.2 seconds to think it over.
I just beat the campaign now I rate it a 5 out of 10. I loved the story, writing, characters, cutscenes, graphics and ending. I hated the flying mission, sniper mission, tank boss, the alone mission and alot of the missions I liked were to short.
Been watching these for a few years and I still say "fuck yeah!" when a new one drops. It's a constant mood. Also, any chance you could sin any of the infamous games or perhaps dragon age? It's always better when it's a game you love haha, I can't explain why.
You should’ve added 100 more sins for the fact that you can’t see your feet in campaign mode, but you can in multiplayer. MW (2019) did this too, and it bothered my soul. I haven’t seen anyone complain about it besides me.
@@LeQuack147 stfu nobody was talking to you what are you pressing me for? He's the one bitching about a minor issue that they already fixed I don't see how I'm in the wrong here but go off I guess 🖕
as someone who lives in the Netherlands, Amsterdam is a poor city to yeet in containers. They should have gone with Rotterdam which is the biggest hub for that shit in the netherlands lol. Amsterdam is legit just a tourist hub. Rotterdam is where all the containers go, Utrecht is the center point for Public Transport, if anyone managed to shut the train station there, a lot of people will be stuck.
Hmm, I wonder why everything is entirely different from the original MW2, couldn't possibly be that it's not a remake but a direct sequel to the 2019 reboot
You can just know by the video's title that the comment section will be filled with fanboys throwing insults at Dartigan. The best part is he doesen't even care about it.
5:38 I'm not so sure the cop was being bigoted when he made that statement. It's night time, the cartels were being hunted, and the cops just saw heavily armed Mexican SF walking towards them. That statement isn't really racist imo Also, this game, along with MW2019 aren't really remakes, since a remake would be something more like RE2R or FF7 remake (though that one might be a bit of a stretch since they deviate a lot from the og plot) It's its own continuity, while bringing in new characters and reintroducing ones from the original trilogy
Giving a sin for not knowing where a shipping container would be shipped since there are only so many shipping ports. Also. Giving a sin for finding out with military top secret clearance where the shipping container got shipped with the limited amount of shipping ports. Yup makes sense.
I was really disappointed in this remake compared to the original. Basically no development happens. The old game had a full-on war, here you're just chasing the same guy all game.
American squad ends up being the villain (except for the woman) and there are a dozen variants of the pride flag in multiplayer but not a single American flag to use for a banner. 50 sins.
I feared something like this would come true in Call of Duty. Ah, diversity. And by diversity, I mean no male Americans operating for America, ever. "Stupid office politics!" - Dave Norton (GTA 5)
11:29 If you pay attention to the story of warzone and the spec ops cutscenes from mw2019 it does make sense why Russia doesn't help, Plus the game takes place 3 years after The First campaign anyway.
The thing I hated most was that there were only like 4 hours of gameplay for the story. Paying 70 bucks for just the base game is nuts. The bugs aren't even cleaned up yet either. During the infiltration mission with Ghost, none of the buildings loaded in so I was just guessing where to tell Ghost to go the ENTIRE time.
![เปิด อาณาจักร หมื่นล้าน "สาระตั้ม" l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3XE0nPF4YkQ/mqdefault.jpg)
A Tom Clancy novel actually did have a Cartel working with terrorists, so this game is more faithful to those novels than Ubisoft is.
The writing is shit like Ubisoft
It's just too bad Tom Clancy's name's been dragged for the dirt and crap because of Ubisoft. He's got to love how to keep shitting out crap games with his name on it. Rest in peace
@@66bloodmoon I don’t think Tom Clancy wanted his name on some half assed left for dead rip off
@@MarxistMogger Lol.
Against All Enemies is the book.
"Kill or capture the target but remember we want him alive"
So, i can only kill him in a non leathal way that leaves the now dead person still alive? Ok then...
I think they mean kill if you don't have a choice but preferably we want him alive
To be fair i think she meant: you can kill him, but keep in mind that he's usefuk Informations for us
it means that they want him alive, but if you can't capture him, kill him, it's not like we can't capture him and we are being ambushed, ok let's let him go free then
Maybe she meant kill if you have no
choice
Pretty much show him the WAP mv Since he's Muslim
I love these videos so much lmao
Nothing like playing through a story, thinking it was fine and then coming here to watch Dartigan carefully explain to you why it made no sense
As God intended!
It's just another overhyped cod
If you need this youtuber to criticise a game for you before realising its problems then the game was fine
@@MonTheWell1886 he literally didn't say that but okay 👌
@@MonTheWell1886 Except for the fact its cleary not fine though, is it? Try again.
-"We need to go to Amsterdam."
-"Why Amsterdam?"
- *TO SHOW OFF OUR GRAPHICAL CAPABILITIES*
Only reason I'd go to Amsterdam: The Red Light District. ;)
-“Alright, we can get a lot of content and action from this.”
-“Yeah, it will be a fulfilling five minutes.”
-“Really? If it’s that short, can we at least combine it with previous short mission and make room for a mission to fill in the plot holes?”
-“No.”
9:00 Thank you for bringing this up. It annoyed me to no end when they said it was illegal to hold him despite the insane amount of laws he had broken up to that point.
Not to mention the USA has historically had no problem illegally detaining people and shows no sign of this deteriorating.
The funny thing about dartigan calling cod a sports game is that they just announced 3 soccer players as upcoming operators for the game.
🅱️ruh
Promotion for teh world cup on the 20th
Of course they are ruining their game with fortnite stuff
Lmao
football*
Honestly I was expecting the CIA lady to be the shepherd this time around. She kept feeding them all the info needed and was captured but not killed and suddenly after she’s captured she knows that the Russians are supplying the Iranians? I thought for sure she was getting set up to be the traitor
Current year, can't have the women be the villains now can we?
@@HiroOfLegend nah, this time it isnt because of current year standards. Its purely because there was a preexisting expectation for General Shepherd to be a traitor. Even though Laswell would’ve been way more unexpected and personal, it never crossed the writers collective mind.
@@T-74 It would have been interesting if they led the player to believing it was gonna be Shepherd and then surprised them with Laswell.
@@louie97ation Or have both of them be traitors, but for different factions. Sheppard is Ollie Northing it up while CIA lady wo4ks for.....say Mararkov or sometjig.
@@HiroOfLegend It would actually be considered woke if the big bad villain was a female character lmao.
The villain in the cliffhanger left in the previous MW was the villain of Warzone where the plot "continued". That why he isn't mentioned anymore
Warzone and spec-ops
Is Warzone canon tho? Cos last I checked, Verdansk was nuked after a zombie outbreak
@@0uttaS1TE the story involving the zombie outbreak isn’t canon
Yeah but it was expressly stated that he went back to not Afghanistan with the rest of not Al-Qaeda after the events of the Warzone storyline. Yet here he isn’t even mentioned and the role of not Al-Qaeda leader is taken up by some random Iranian officer instead for some reason.
@@MikeP828 it is Chek mw2 rose's bio it takes about the nuke
I’d like to point out that the ending of MW2019 wasn’t actually the end of the storyline, because Warzone culminated in the assassination of Victor Zakhaev
And then they decided not to mention any of that, probably because it ended with a zombie outbreak and the nuclear destruction of Verdansk. They apparently thought this was insane enough to allow it to be canon, but not enough to be mentioned in the sequel
And this is why multiplayer should never have a story.
This is why you don't make multiplayer battle royales be canon to the main game. Because nobody can replay it and they have to watch some youtuber summarize the whole thing.
The zombies and the nuke weren't canon. That was an event that led to the next battle royal map. The MW2019 story ended with zakaev falling down the silo.
They could've just made a parallel universe like advanced warfare did with zombies@@jurassicarkjordanisgreat1778
Victor could’ve been a good main villain for a sequel. But I guess it’s cool not even seeing him while shooting a bunch of respawning enemies in a match where nobody’s even thinking about storylines.
saying its hard to tell the difference between Mexican SF in plain clothes with plate carriers and military weapons isnt really a bigoted statement considdering the cartels have military hardware and are seen with it on a regular basis in Mexico
I guess he meant it was more the tone, with him being a southern cop, they were playing into stereotypes too.
Was really puzzled when Ghost brought out the whole bag of skull masks. Does he carry that same bag wherever he goes to? Or did they have time to stop by a shop in some war-torn Mexico to buy those masks?
I was trying real hard to figure out what long range missile was that. Still got no clue why America's own missile defense system won't be able to shoot it down since it wasn't hypersonic..
I have to say, the character models, especially the faces, are the nearest to realism I‘ve ever seen in a videogame. In some scenes, depending on the lighting, it actually looked like a real actor being recorded. That‘s insane.
I never play COD, but their graphics have come far.
That is fine and all but they invested so much into that, they forgot to pay for a decent script writer. Their script must a kid who has watched too many "attack on america" fictions 😂
@@ankandey3614 I'm not saying the game is great or that graphics like that are most important. I was just stating that the graphics are insane. I have no idea of the writing or gameplay, cause I don't play CoD.
@@Boosterboy1994 Just sayin. Graphics wise they did an absolute killin job
@@Boosterboy1994 Bruh cod ww2 from 2017 have better cutscenes than mw2 .
@Transistor Jump They are made by sledgehammer .
well we can agree the biggest problem of MW2 is the lack of logic between the geopolitical implications of our characters actions and that most of the game is set in friendly countries to the US, To me the biggest dissapointment i have with the plot was, why let Hassan go, is "ilegal" five minutes ago i bombed the shit out of my own country don't give me that crap
We are working for the US nothing is illegal unless the public hears about it so let me kill civilians infinity ward
Wasn't the AC130 mission in Mexico against a cartel? That's vastly different compared to holding a POW who you don't have hard proof against other than your soldiers saw them with terrorists, which is not hard evidence
@@soupgirl1871 even if is against a Cartel, the Mexican goverment should know, now the game doesn't give the impression many Mx Gvt officials know anything
@@rincontibio7664 I mean, we were also working with Fuerzas Especialez. The Mexican Special Forces. I highly doubt they would be if this was a case of the US deciding to send a PMC without Mexico even knowing
@@soupgirl1871 maybe but if we pay attention they never mention any other mx official knewing about and Los Vaqueros look liked an indepedent unit from the regular chain of command, even so, i don't think Mexico was willing to leave a private owned AC-130 to wreck havoc in a town they still, at least of the paper, control
Why is CIA tasking British SAS Opretors to do their work? Shouldn't CIA be sending Delta Force or SEALs or someone else? It is a big plot hole to show Soap, Ghost and Price in the game.
The new 141 makes no sense. In the original it was a large group of highly skilled soldiers from different nations put together by Shephard. Not just a small squad of British SAS chosen by price.
@@mj3541 Yeah, I was hoping to see some more representation of operators from the different nations.
I'm pretty sure its because laswell is good friends with price, also bc the general betrays them anyway, but your point still stands entirely as well
I would like to make a special mention to that last mission for failing to notify you that you're suppose to get shot by Hassan. Can't tell you how many times I restarted my checkpoint because I thought I messed up on the takedown.
Why would it notify you? That takes away the suprise element? If it came up with a pop up menu saying relax, youre supposed to get shot it takes away from the drama of the story.
@@XalphosaurX Funny, I don't recall the surprise element being taken away when you got the "Objective Failed" in MW3 when Makarov opened the helicopter door.
@@shadow200343The objective didn’t fail. They stopped the missile and even if Soap got killed they would’ve had Hassan trapped anyways so they still would’ve killed him.
@@shadow200343 it kinda was
@mj3541
You're not talking about the game he was
As an Iranian, I feel offended that after killing Soley... Qorbani, ghost doesn't reference the "Kotlet" meme, a nickname given to that monster.
Cooking mechanics in a COD game,the franchise has clearly lost it's identity smh
one major thing for me is how it doesn't get close to the edge anymore it doesn't make you question stuff.
I think a big one with a lot of this stuff now is just they're to afraid to make those kinda moves with call of duty, even though they're about the brutality of war
like in mw3, you see a child get killed by a chemical gas bomb, its there to make a point, considering the game is about terrorism etc among other things bit weird to dial it back
the game just doens't really make sense stuff just happens theres no build, you know immediatly shephard is the bad right out the gate, they don't skirt on the edge anymore its playing it safe even with the story its just ehh
Bro tf are you talking about, in MW2019 there’s dead kids from Russian gas, terrorists shooting kids in the embassy, price and gaz using the butcher’s wife and kid as hostages, and this is only talking about stuff that involves kids 💀
Instead we get hammy dialogue of Price talking about what makes someone a "true warrior," as if real people besides larpers talk like that.
@@physical_insanity exactly, ts a game about war, its not some soft topic is harsh brutal, war crimes happen etc i wouldn't put ww2 as a mild thing
On top of that they don’t even want to kill anyone one, a big part of mw2 was the shocking betrayal of Shepard with the death of Ghost and Roach, it motivated you to go after him but in this not even a side character like Rodolfo can be killed off
That kind happened I MW19 with the "truth serum", The Butcher shooting a boy and the "we get our hands dirty and take the gloves off" thing
the dialogue between ghost and soap was so fucking funny. really gave personality to these characters
2:32 Although i think it was dumb to do so, they did expand on what happened to that villain, he is the antagonist of the original “story” of warzone
which in itself is stupid, why move onto warzone, but start the story in the campaign these games don't seem to follow on
MGRR PFP, respect 💪
In the end of the first remake we find out the new villain is victor Zakheav, he gets killed off in Warzone, Al-Asad is revealed to still be at large, he never appeared since his introduction, he came out as an operator, but that's it. Why build up a big character, and not have them in the sequel?
@@asrieldreemurrthebestestbo1716 that part will always urk me. They could’ve replaced Hassan and had it be Al-Assad and it wouldn’t change anything really, or at least have him be the general that gets bombed. They kinda just left him in Limbo and he’s probably gonna play a part in MW3 but the lack of even a mention of him is just terrible writing
You know, it really irks me when Modern Military games get weapons completely wrong, in a "we didn't even Google search what this is or what it does" kind of way. It would be like if the next FIFA game had Tom Brady on the US team, just because that's a recognizable "sports" name. Like, "ballistic missiles with homing targeting devices" and "the top secret super chemical weapon, chlorine gas". JFC.
Only Japanese developers can get things right in a modern military game, and that's my five cents.
"Maybe it was Canada, who knows?" that was funnier than I expected.
Why?
Bc Canada couldn't even invade Greenland if they wanted to, have you seen a typical 21st century Canadian lately? Not to mention thier military has been depleted to the bare minimum completely unable to do anything militarily other than tag along with the US as they go invade whatever the next target is.
To be fair, it is a reboot and not a remake. Does that change anything about how soulless this game is? No. Is it almost worse since the developers couldn't be bothered to stick to what even made the original appealing in the first place? Yes.
The biggest sin is the Shepherd redesign. Seriously, just give him the damn mustache and I'll be happy.
Ghost's redesign is pretty bad too. The original was simple and realistic: Just a regular guy with sunglasses and a skull scarf. The redesign looks like a tryhard cosplayer on Halloween
The biggest sin is that this campaign wasn't intense enough.
@@JThePervertedSummoner nah i think he is more intimidating, which he should be. but i respect your opinon
@@JThePervertedSummoner we got the og Ghost mask back we’ll never get the moustache back
DSP’s reaction to Ghost’s mask had me dead. “he looks like a little kid dressed up as fucking Skeletor during Halloween”🤣🤣
the biggest sin of this game is that like overwatch 2 its part of an attempt to make you require a contract mobile number to play half of it
I like how dartigan talks about genuine points and not personal opinions like other channels
Gcn...
Don't overrated him, he gets a good amount wrong. And personal opinions are always more enjoyable than "objective" critiques.
@@channel45853 i wouldn’t say always
@@lustmore maybe, I won't be hypocritical.
I mean.... i guess if I had selective hearing, I'd have the same opinion as you. because theres shit ton of personal opinions in this video. but i guess it's lovely to be able to completely ignore that when said opinion is presented with a facade of objectivity and professionalism
Another game sin: Instead of letting Price & the rest of the 141 handle the mission in Chicago, Laswell should've used Delta Force instead since they have the same skills as Price's team.
FR. The Kill or Capture should’ve had Sgt. Foley and the 75th ranger regiment instead of MARSOC. The Chicago mission could’ve had Sandman and them.
So hiding in shipping containers is actually very smart. Alot easier to transport, can include all the electronics needed for remote launch alot harder to identify as a missle PLUS do you have any idea how many shipping containers enter and exit the US on a daily basis. It would be near impossible to check each and every one.
Also its AC-130; the C-130 is just the transport version of the aircraft (no guns).
Btw love your content just had to me tion those things from early in video
Ironically enough, its not even an AC-130 in the game either. Its some weird future hybrid of a C-17 and something else I couldn't recognise
@@termnus77 yeah i did think it looked a little different. Good spot
There is already a russian container-launched missile called the club-k and the chinese are working on their own called the YJ-18C, the US developing or having a system of their own isn't a particularly wild idea.
Bonus sin: US helicopter in the beginning mission just straight up fly to the danger zone instead of turning around.
Dartigan has answered the the call of duty for the sins video. God of War Ragnarok is my vote.
Shadow Company's betrayal is the dumbest story beat in this game. 141 had NO evidence nor had any idea that Shadow Company delivered the missiles, so turning on 141 actually did more harm than good. Also, the scene itself might be the dumbest thing I've seen in a COD game. Graves is just like: "Hey, this is my base now. Me and my PMC are just going to take this base and DETAIN the Mexican Special Forces inside for NO REASON." Who writes this shit?
*8:07 actually, if I may, while operating in Mexican airspace most likely would be illegal, the obtaining of the gunship could happen. So you see, there are C-130s being privately sold and operated, so Shadow Company couldve bought a C-130, somehow obtain a 40mm bofors, 25mm and 105mm howitzer and rig it on, and obtain other essential gear. It’s unlikely, but it could happen
I love that you're dropping facts on military nomenclature and terms
Still messed up on some. It’s an AC-130 gunship not a C-130 gunship. Even then it’s not even based off a C-130 hull so idk what that thing is actually supposed to be.
I was looking forward to Dartigan looking over COD: MWII. I knew the game would not get away with it! :D
With Ghost alive I wonder how the final encounter will be against Makarov.
Probably shot in the face, to make up the fact that Ghost wasn't killed off this time.
There is a difference between remake and reboot this is a reboot timeline
Then why call it a remake?
@@jlev1028 where does it say its a remake
@@evolution6411 ignore this person, they are on a automatic response ting
@@defenderofminorities3056 Have you been following me? I only replied to two other comments under this video.
@@jlev1028 when did they
One thing I should say, is that this isn't a remake. Not in any sense of the word. This has been clarified by Infinity Ward several times when 2019's Modern Warfare was coming out, that this is a reboot. A completely new story, separate from the original aside from characters and a few rewritten story beats.
All the set ups Modern Warfare ‘19 had did get wrapped up. Just in the Battle Royale expansion…
Not all of them, the new not Al-Qaeda leader is still around and kicking.
I only completed the campaign for the skins and tokens lol. It really wasn't that notable to me to be honest aside from the occasional quirk. I also noticed that the campaign difficulty was a massive increase from previous titles.
Hell, I like that it's more difficult.
Makes you have to plan out your attacks more.
False hardness.
@@fidelio9301 Artificial difficulty. But I really like the way you said it better lol.
@@pepsicola4718 Yeah totally it’s interchangeable. 😂
Depends - grenade spam on veteran is worse then dealing with armour wearing enemies at times
They can't even be bothered to make up a new name because they know the consumers will buy it anyway, I'm gona get it when it goes down a bit
Ghost: _Shepheard burned us_ get it??
In the OG MW2 Shepherd literally burned 🔥 him & Roach.
2:30 the villian wasn't written out they just decided to tie up the plotline in fucking warzone of all things. the first six season endings are about that plot.
It’s sad, I’m dropping 20-30 kills a match almost always on top of the leaderboard and I’m still not having fun
You could try using a pistol only for matches.
You forgot the plastic glock that would explode in his hand at the end there.
Carteles controlling the mexican army is not as crazy as you think.
Yeah but it's not like they just send them to attack a team without any questions asked.
@@fidelio9301 Especially if is aided by am UK/US Task Force.
The inclusion of Blackwater, sorry, Shadow Company and Wagner, sorry, Russian ultra-nationalist PMCs whose names are so forgettable, I can't remember their name of the top of my head, makes me think they're going to go for a not-Blackwater vs not-Wagner mission in the next game.
I think it was Konni PMC
I am not going to defend CoD in anyway but I just want to nuance the opening of the video for anyone that hasn't played this game, or the old ones. MW2 2022 isn't a remake, it's a reboot, and the plot is indeed very different but it follows the exact same development as the OG MW2, taking you to comparable locations, with similar objectives. There already is a remaster of the original campaign out there.
I mean, they included crafting mechanics in some missions, there is already enough to criticise without being untruthful.
I don't know anything about cod, think I might've played mw one long time ago but forgot everything. Thanks for explaining some of this.
In real life, they would have tortured the Iranian AND the narco chick for DAYS. They would have extracted all the info they could have possibly needed from them before making them "disappear". But it's 2022. Everything has to be PC and watered down lol. Which is why they didn't have the guts to make "No Russian" a playable level again! This game's campaign is a joke.
the villain from the ending of mw1 was a wz villain. and that story was done a long time ago. that’s why we never see him
10:42 price plays geoguessr in his free time
This game is literally the movie Act of Valor just with a shady pic, a general that betrayed his country, Irish guys, Brits, and ballistic missiles not explosive vests. Hell even the guy that voices Alejandro in this game sounds like the guy who lead the Mexican special forces in the movie and looks like that actor if he grew his hair out.
6:20 If we're gonna get really technical, there's also Soap and Yuri from back in MW3, so that's not the case. It's just that unlike older IW, the current writers can't bring themselves to actually off any of the protagonists.
For Laswell not getting help, they offer to help her but don’t shoot because they don’t wanna shoot her. It’s literally the first dialogue in that cut scene. At least do the research
I feel like COD devs except Treyarch don’t know what to do with the campaign portion of the game anymore
It was suppose to be Victor Zakhaev and Khaled Al-Asad but i guess they got rid of them and replaced with Iran and Makarov.
7:20 you do this every so often in your sin videos and i never understood it. Why can’t Alejandro be here? He helps diversify the already boring cast.
Its not even trying hard to make the story more palletable. It’s just adding a character who can represent the good side of the conflict that also ADDS to the story which Alejandro does since he’s a big part of this dry ass plot
Cast isn’t boring (in my opinion), but it is a bit odd that TF141 is solely comprised of Brits and Scotsman. Farah doesn’t really count because she’s leading an army and Alex is “dead.” Adding Alejandro was fine.
@@kingkocoa4467 I wouldn’t say they’re boring, I guess that’s a bad description of how I actually feel. I think they’re very dry, they have fun surface level personalities but not much beyond that so I guess dry
Great. Now the plot and characters can be boring,but this time in Spanish.
@@tylerhelton9938 right?!
@@JakeTylenol Cod has always had a very surface level cast without much depth, Resnov and the Masons are arguably the only exception.
I know the video can’t cover all the sins so it won’t be too long, so here’s some more sins that did not get put in.
- driving through a cartel held town in a convoy of 3 identical black SUVs thinking the cartel would not be tipped off.
- the random times the operators will decide to wear or not wear a helmet. Bullets, shrapnel, and even rocks can kill if they hit somebody in the head. Helmets help prevent that.
- graves massacres an entire town looking for Hassan and cleaning out the cartel without intervention by the Mexican army, which is according to the game on the cartel’s payroll
- That convoy was ridiculously long
- Hassan took over a building and has hostages. The jurisdiction for that incident would not be the military, CIA, and British SAS. US marines are brought in the game to help clear the building. In reality the FBI would be taking point. The FBI’s Hostage Rescue Team, Chicago SWAT, and other police units would be taking point.
-how did the CIA cover up a hostage taking in a building and a missile launch from Chicago. Chicago’s violence levels are bad, but it’s not cruise missile bad
Buying a Call of Duty game is like buying a Madden game. No matter how much they change, it's still exactly the same every year.
Probably why he stated it’s like sports game, because it’s true. They can change up whatever fucking setting they want to for a certain quota, but they’ll never escape the mediocrity plaguing the series after Cold War dropped.
Dartigan's videos are very much like cocaine to me without the side effects, they are adictive as fuck and make me want more and more.
Another great video as always
Same. I wish he could put out more material quicker and do some older games.
Stroke the shaft 😂🤡🖕
Gotta give credit where it's due, the cutscene graphics are *Amazing*
Game play is lacking, which is the most important part...
Meh, the characters faces still look like melting wax
Great video, but I’d make to make a correction. The cop didn’t mean it to sound bigoted. In low light, at night, one man armed with an assault rifle and wearing a tactical vest, and the other wearing just a plain hoodie while waving around a handgun, in an area where the cartel operate can confuse any cop. I’d like you to make that call yourself in their shoes, especially after getting calls that cartel members and a terrorist have crossed the border and are now breaking and entering into people’s homes (probably assaulting some here or there). You’d probably do the exact same thing, keeping guns trained and barking orders until they are close enough to realize they are MSF and/or until you hear them explain their mission thereby matching a tip you received from a CIA agent. You turned that more political than it actually was. How about ding the cops for foolishly cuddling around rather than keeping eyes out for, you know, the fucking terrorist and cartel that are being chased down by said MSF they’ve just interrupted. Also, Gomez is a Hispanic name, so the one cuffing Al would have to be considered bigoted by your logic since he did so quickly and assertively. Ay di-s mío.
I think you could excuse the fact that captain price wore a boonie hat while swimming in canals. Only because he's captain price
11:08 they told her to move in the cut scene so she didn’t get shot and she said “there mine”
It would have been cool to see a saciro style shootout in the Mexico scene
You know a game has some bad logic when someone like me can predict half the sins in a video
After watching this, MW2 2022 campaign looks dumber/more ridiculous than MW2 Original............
And that game involved jumping a snowmobile to a LZ located across a 100m Canyon
Call of Duty is just Tom Clancy for Zoomers might honestly be the most accurate descritpion of that series ive ever heard.
I don’t understand the “bigoted” comment about that cop’s quote. They have cartel members from Mexico firing at people in the street, and two clearly Hispanic males with rifles and body armor are seen in the road. Is that not hard to tell the difference? Would you somehow make the assumption that Hispanic men with body armor and military-grade firearms walking down the street without jurisdiction to be there aren’t cartel?
That’s not bigoted, it makes sense.
I didn’t expect this video to be so overtly ignorant about “racism”. You should do some research into real life Mexican cartels. They do the exact things seen in this game to snitches. This isn’t some “racist American viewpoint”. Why would the developers include so many Mexican allied troops in the game and literally have you play as Mexican Special Forces if they didn’t like Mexicans?
Some other gripes i have with the game and i want to mention is that for one, the redesigns of shepherd and ghost suck. As you said, ghost is an edgelord and he is (plus i think he looks ridiculous with that mask while not wearing a helmet. Makes his face look small by comparison) and shepherd looks like any basic old man general rather than having a distinct look.
Thank you for also mentioning the complete disregard for Zakhaev last game. I was originally under the impression that it was a prequel not a reboot, and then learning that THIS is what they’re rebooting it to brings up my other point.
The plot line of this series has potential. But it’s screwed by the fact that Activision instead wants to name drop old characters and ruin a great trilogy. This series legit could have been like a continuation of the previous trilogy, with the antagonists such as Al Quatala, barkov, hassan, and graves all being vastly different than antagonists seen before (plus, these take place in 2019-2022, whereas the others were 2011-2017. So it could have absolutely been a continuation.)
Another thing that ruins this for me is that Gaz, soap, and ghost have no real distinction to be gaz, soap, and ghost by name. Gaz could have stayed Kyle Garrick only and be his own character. This game in particular makes me feel like there’s no reason to have ghost and soap of the 141 involved other than “iT’S GhOsT aND SOaP FroM ThE 141”
Their places could have been replaced with american soldiers because they have more reason to be directly involved with the main conflict due to it being in mexico/the US. (You know what character who is NOT confirmed dead that i would actually love to see in place of Ghost? Derek. “Frost”. Westbrook. Wouldve made much more sense to me)
Graves betraying could have been interesting if he ran a different merc company and maybe did so of his own accord instead of rehashing the shepherd betrayal and making it incredibly obvious….
…. Wow, I actually wrote way more than i thought i would. But i think my point is made that this game could have been less annoying if it was its own story and not just a carbon copy of an iconic series.
I like it that he sinned the killing of an Iranian general. Im surprised you didn’t mention the US actually killed a top Iranian general in a drone strike in Afghanistan a few years ago.
what the fuck is bigoted about "can't tell you apart from the cartel" in a game where the cartel has the same tac equipment as world class militaries?
This guy sometimes has some woke, moronic takes.
The only reason modern CoDs don’t have as many sins as the original MW saga is because they have half as much playtime.
The bad guy from mw2019 was killed in warzone, the story continued in spec ops then warzone Intel missions
i always find myself explaining things to people the same way dartigan explains every sin. and it’s hilarious
"A completely different plot, which makes for a very poor remake" it's not a remake, it's a reboot. Meaning you take the original characters, a more or less similar context, and you make a completely new story.
i actually dont think the cops were that bigoted.. like, theyre saying it was hard at first glance to differentiate the *good* armed mexicans illegally entering the united states from the *bad* armed mexicans illegally entering the united states. Not reaaally that bigoted if you take like 1.2 seconds to think it over.
I knew Graves would betray us when Diego chuckled when he heard Graves’ name. “Llena Tumbas” Fill up Graves.🤣
I just beat the campaign now I rate it a 5 out of 10. I loved the story, writing, characters, cutscenes, graphics and ending. I hated the flying mission, sniper mission, tank boss, the alone mission and alot of the missions I liked were to short.
Been watching these for a few years and I still say "fuck yeah!" when a new one drops. It's a constant mood.
Also, any chance you could sin any of the infamous games or perhaps dragon age? It's always better when it's a game you love haha, I can't explain why.
You should’ve added 100 more sins for the fact that you can’t see your feet in campaign mode, but you can in multiplayer. MW (2019) did this too, and it bothered my soul. I haven’t seen anyone complain about it besides me.
Because it's not that serious you're pressed over a minor issue nobody else cares about but you
@@Iam2Derpy4uM8 I’m sorry for having an opinion about my needs as an old gamer for immersion in $60 2022 video games. Forgive me.
@@Iam2Derpy4uM8 Kotick isn't going to fellate you for going attack dog over a call of duty game. Find a more meaningful use of your time.
@@LeQuack147 stfu nobody was talking to you what are you pressing me for? He's the one bitching about a minor issue that they already fixed I don't see how I'm in the wrong here but go off I guess 🖕
Can’t wait to hear his long monologue at the beginning 😂
This man is quick😭😭 Salute to you, Dartigan🫡
as someone who lives in the Netherlands, Amsterdam is a poor city to yeet in containers. They should have gone with Rotterdam which is the biggest hub for that shit in the netherlands lol. Amsterdam is legit just a tourist hub. Rotterdam is where all the containers go, Utrecht is the center point for Public Transport, if anyone managed to shut the train station there, a lot of people will be stuck.
the entire COD campaign, whoever the designer is, has no knowledge about military operation or military technology. they just copy paste from movies.
watch videos of us soldiers in action. It's pretty accurate
@@bubbadean0920 lol you made the point
@@kiss4luna what
@@bubbadean0920 i mean you're right about it
@@kiss4luna oh my bad, misread it.
That’s a good point. Why couldn’t have Hassan spilled the beans of where the missiles were from right then and there?
Hmm, I wonder why everything is entirely different from the original MW2, couldn't possibly be that it's not a remake but a direct sequel to the 2019 reboot
It's still stupid. Why remix the story of the original if it's all going to boil down to the same plot points like Makarov and Shepard anyway?
The villain they set up at the end of Modern warfare was killed during the warzone storyline.
You can just know by the video's title that the comment section will be filled with fanboys throwing insults at Dartigan. The best part is he doesen't even care about it.
Its the complete opposite?
look darty i feel like its obvious by now that the new COD MW games are reboots, not remakes
When I found out COD gets funding from the department of defense the propaganda in it made 100x more sense.
I don’t think you know the difference between a remake and a reboot
5:38
I'm not so sure the cop was being bigoted when he made that statement. It's night time, the cartels were being hunted, and the cops just saw heavily armed Mexican SF walking towards them. That statement isn't really racist imo
Also, this game, along with MW2019 aren't really remakes, since a remake would be something more like RE2R or FF7 remake (though that one might be a bit of a stretch since they deviate a lot from the og plot)
It's its own continuity, while bringing in new characters and reintroducing ones from the original trilogy
Giving a sin for not knowing where a shipping container would be shipped since there are only so many shipping ports.
Also. Giving a sin for finding out with military top secret clearance where the shipping container got shipped with the limited amount of shipping ports. Yup makes sense.
I was really disappointed in this remake compared to the original. Basically no development happens. The old game had a full-on war, here you're just chasing the same guy all game.
WOW! 2 weeks after this game came out and Dartigan is already roasting it?! Don’t waste your money!
Getting off the oil rig to get to the controls instead of using c4 made me catch on to how stupid the campaign really was
American squad ends up being the villain (except for the woman) and there are a dozen variants of the pride flag in multiplayer but not a single American flag to use for a banner. 50 sins.
I feared something like this would come true in Call of Duty. Ah, diversity. And by diversity, I mean no male Americans operating for America, ever.
"Stupid office politics!"
- Dave Norton (GTA 5)
20:20 The one thing I am mostly confused about playing the Campaign for the first time lmao
That AC-130 raining hell on that town in mexico and not being on the news or mentioned again is crazy. lol
11:29 If you pay attention to the story of warzone and the spec ops cutscenes from mw2019 it does make sense why Russia doesn't help, Plus the game takes place 3 years after The First campaign anyway.
The thing I hated most was that there were only like 4 hours of gameplay for the story. Paying 70 bucks for just the base game is nuts. The bugs aren't even cleaned up yet either. During the infiltration mission with Ghost, none of the buildings loaded in so I was just guessing where to tell Ghost to go the ENTIRE time.
fucking hell you speed ran that
took me almost 9 hours on my first run
and A LOT more hours on veteran to complete
@@reelgesh51 Haha, to be fair I just played on Hardened, not veteran. But still...
That bang bus line ☠️