The most outlandish sentence ever uttered: "Jesus is God, God is Jesus". Anything relating to the sentences of "God" being in control of the multiverse is absolutely outlandish and most of all - ASININE.
Yes! I just started watching the series "From" and I keep thinking how messed up our own reality really is. This whole existence is preposterous, but because it is all we have ever known, it is "normal." I feel trapped here too. Literally every day I find myself looking around and thinking, "WTF???"
I know you're probably getting a lot of pushback and hate for this but I want you to know I found it profoundly comforting. Thanks for making the video and keep up the good work.
I had 80x, that shit teleported into a wall, I was a part of the wall, I could not move, speak, think or feel, but I was able to observe. Fucking weirdest experience ever
That is hindu teaching, stolen by buddhists. Hindus even say that reality is maya ( illusion or simulation) and it came into existence when Purusha started to interact with Shakti ( energy)
The one is a computationally unlimited entity projecting itself through an infinite number of avatars (us) taking on all possible mathematical perspectives in order to understand and experience itself. We are the universe experiencing itself and it requires an arrow of time in order to update the perspective (genetics)
So life and death are highly abstract concepts, departures from reality used as aids to (mis)understand our place in the universe. But we don't really have a place in the universe, we are the universe. Life and Death are just examples of atomic distribution and redistribution. I love this because on the surface it seems i'm comprised of bits (atoms) of other people, animals, objects past and present, it gives me a feeling of meaningful endurance. But really there are no objects, no separations, no life or death, just the ongoing flow of quantum distribution and redistribution.
Well done video. The idea about consiousness may be fringe but I believe it and everything else I’ve been convinced if since 2005. I can’t see it any other way anymore. It has brought me comfort in respect to the big existential questions but also a feeling of isolation because I’m not anywhere near a physicist. Trying to explain this to most folks, without the proper vocabulary or academic experience, makes me sound like a crack head. So I just watch people walk around without even a clue about this and get frustrated by all the trivial drama people concern themselves with. But then again all that trivial drama is part of the “unified whole”. It’s literally the meaning of life.
Bravo!!! Thank you for this amazing teaching! ...possibly interesting, i came to similar conclusions through thinking about what happens when every pattern exists, and how all patterns arise from nothing: try to imagine that nothing is real and only potential exists. It seems that most investigations into the nature of reality start with the assumption that reality is "real". Very few take a counter-intuitive approach, assuming that really there is "nothing" - no space, no time, no energy/matter. no God... and then try and find any path - some way to get to "here" from nothing. Try thinking like this... consider that our universe arises from 'math-potential'; that really there is only potential and nothing actually exists. just go with it. imagine this potential as an abstract "opposite" comparison. In our universe, time is 'relative'. There is no perceived existence (now) without it being relative to some prior perceived existence. From pure nothing, infinity happens via potential. Here's how: You get there from the nothing=0, the imaginary set containing the nothing set=1, the set containing that=2, and so on. Infinity emerges from nothing using imaginary "potential". the same theory posits new infinities relative to that infinity, and those infinities relative to each other.. again and again.. for infinity! It's a recursive, infinite pattern of abstract creation. Higher 'levels' of infinity emerge. Aleph infinity happens. Inside these imagined potential infinities, there are subsets, patterns if you will, that consist of portions that follow any and every set of arbitrary 'rules.' Think about "filtering" the Aleph infinity potential using our 'physical laws' and constants as the 'rules'. It results in our universe history. Although purely imaginary, our universe emerges via a relative potential path. Regarding time, because "now" is always relative to a path, it does not need to be *real*. All possible universe configurations exist purely as subsets of the Aleph infinity potential. All possible data configurations emerge (e.g Hilbert Space just is). All times exist always. TLDR: Nothing really exists. All universes are subsets of the infinite 'everything' potential using different sets of arbitrary rules. The M in M-Theory stands for Math. This is our foundation. This is how we get to everything from nothing. Now let's seriously consider God. All gods. We already postulated that every possible pattern exists. All patterns are just repeating sections of "relative change" according to a set of arbitrary "rules." Using the same postulate that created our initial infinity, notice higher order dimensions create themselves from collections of lower level dimensions. Think of the 4th dimension (spacetime) like you might a movie. The movie is just a collection of picture frames (fixed patterns) ordered in a special sequence that gives the illusion of movement when observed quickly in that sequence. All paterns exist. So that means a "path" through a set of ordered patterns is what this universe really *is*. Think of your entire life birth-to-death imagining that each "moment" of time in your life is like a picture frame (fixed pattern) in the movie. Your experience of this life is movement from pattern to pattern, like a movie. In higher dimensions, you can "look" at your entire life and just "see" it all at once. It sounds like a super-power, but i think would be boring, like reading the end of a novel first. Now imagine the biggest potential pattern in the highest potential dimension. The imagined pattern would encompass everything. Because it encompasses all patterns, it must have the self-aware pattern, too. This "all encompassing" pattern is what I think of as God. God would "see" everything at once. God probably is really, really bored. There's nothing to do, nothing to learn, no way to grow. ever. So what might this imaginary God do? Why not pick some subset of the everything that forms a universe with planets like Earth that can support life, and then go "play the game" of being alive! -- It would be much more fun to live our illusion lives than to just see them all at once "forever". If these ideas are close to correct, then God is everyone and everything. You are God. This life is a game. Play it well.
The Bible says that there is a little bit of GOD in all of us......our conscience, the Holy Spirit, which most decide to reject instead of investigate. some get it, most don't. "Infinity (whatever that crap is) emerges from nothing using imaginary "potential. Higher 'levels' of infinity emerge"........and you STILL have 'imaginary' nothing from nothing = NOTHING!!! You poindexters never cease to amaze......kinda like Kamal Harris and her 'passage of time'!!
The universe itself is a 4th dimension faster than light supernova bubble. The 5th dimension is an infinite cube that encases the universe. It's also the magic cube where our quantum thoughts go and then bounce back and manifest. If you understand quantum mechanics and how things change state when observed or measured then you will come to the realization you are a flesh and blood time machine. Kinda like how Tesla was describing the world as frequency and vibrations. Your state of mind helps a lot with this. Raw knowledge helps too but is not absolutely necessary.
Maybe the universe was born when the first conscious awoke somewhere in very limited space and started wondering questions and the universe responded by creating an effect to the conscious over space around it.
Maybe the super stenchy beer fart that, moments ago, tore my anus as it violently escaped, will eventually enter God's nostrils. Only then will He realize, inventing 'humans' (patent pending) was his worst mistake!
Possibly other consciouses came out of nothing as an evolution after the first. Many may have reincarnated. The universe built itself to be accepted with the quantum effects after otherwise if quantum mechanics failed the consciousness may die of boredom a bit like rejecting The Matrix you could say? Perhaps?
We are both the chicken and the egg, or both sides of the yin/yang- you cannot have one without the other.. we exist because the universe exists and all we see in the universe exists because we observe it.
We are just a small bubble, in an ever expanding "hole". This hole is alive and have a direct impact on our universe. Multiverse theory absolutely proved. This is fact ✨
I think this is a neat topic but I don't necessarily think it's as miraculous. I mean, superposition is breaking for quantum objects essentially every moment of every moment. With all these possibilities the world still turns out the same way over and over. It doesn't really seem to matter which way the electron is spinning. Cool. It could be in any spin state and the moment you interact with that energy system it's no longer an energy system that is untouched so you can't know it's original journey minus the velocity of your interaction. But again everything seems to turn off the same way over and over and over again despite all of these possibilities. It doesn't seem like it's a case of the right thing happening but just that the right thing is a gazillion possibilities and they're all fine. I've also always found it interesting that we have this idea that the quantum world is possible of doing all of these different things and you don't know what it's going to actually do until you measure it.... But that seems to be true about macro life as well. Like you don't know what your dog's going to do until it does it. You can have some certainty or some reasonable guesses but you don't really know exactly what's going to do until it actually happens. Like you don't know what the quantum world's going to do until it actually happens. From our perspective that is measuring it but something is always happening when it interacts with any other energy systems which is constantly happening. Superposition is constantly breaking for an unfathomable number of energy packets. And people don't disappear and reappear. Like the world is incredibly consistent considering the narrative that all of these possibilities are available.... It just doesn't seem to matter. And I know that we're able to do measurements with single electrons and stuff like that but it seems like we're still in an infancy with that kind of thing. It's amazing that these experiments are even possible but there may be things going on in the systems that are way beyond our current knowledge base. What I do find fascinating about quantum entanglement and stuff like that is that we have formulas that can let us design things based on how we think things are going to work and they're pretty successful but we don't know why it works. I find that fascinating because it's sort of like Newton knew it gravity did from a mathematical practical sense but he didn't know what it was. It seems that the idea of shut up and calculate is basically using Newton to get spaceships where they need to go and it works but you don't know why and they're probably are some miscalculations along the way that you don't realize. I can see why Einstein and others believe there are hidden variables. The entire history of science is having a practical way to use a phenomena that we don't understand. I just hope I live long enough to be here when those discoveries are made. Figuring out why reality works the way it does.... What an awesome thing to have access to while you get to be alive.
The universe is inside of that which is awake to itself . it's more bizarre than you a possibly imagine and simultaneously the most natural thing imaginable, which makes it even more bizarre .
Great video. Very enlightening for an armchair physicist such as my self. This theory seems very promising and my hat is off to you for explaining it. Thanks. Continue your great videos please. I have just subscribed.
This one of many thieves! All that belong to human (that was written several years ago), the unuverse as one indivisable unit, constants, connecting both levels (both subatomic and unibmversal levels),..... etc (the irrational thieves are not human)!
No, No, No! Particles do not exist in two places at the same time. This is a complete misunderstanding of QM! Particles do not exist until they are measured and then they are in one and only one location. Before measurement, they are waves in a quantum field (hence wave-particle duality) and where the particle will end up is determined by the probability of the square of the wave function governed by the Schrodinger equation. The idea of multiple superimposed states applies only to the wave function and NOT the resultant particle! The particle, after measurement, is in a single state!
@markscheuer8648 particle can exist in the same time at different places. Example is like watching the same t.v show on different chanels. Location is different but occupying the same time. You have to break it down so some people can understand what you mean
Space and time is interwoven together. Matter distort time as per einstein general theory of relativity. The fabric of space is curve by mass which distorts time. It's called time dilation
@markscheuer8648 Although I actually mostly agree with you, it is not fully correct. I borrowed generative AI for this one...! ------- Quantum physics suggests that particles can exist in multiple places at once, a phenomenon called quantum superposition. This is because particles can sometimes act like waves, and superposition can only occur when the particles are unobserved. However, observing a particle in two different quantum states causes wave function collapse, and the particle will again exist in only one state. This is known as "quantum collapse". ---- So yes, I agree in some ways, but superposition is a cornerstone of QM IF MEASUREMENT HAS NOT OCCURED.
When you sleep, you can do what ever you want. However your mind is too busy so it goes to default. Hence you think dreams just happen and are just a mishmash of memories. You must clear your mind and concentrate on what you want to do while in the dream state.
Thanks for providing a brilliant video enlightening even those who are not fully adept at QM. The interpretation that you provide is fascinating. It just tried to say exactly what is called as "Maya" in Hinduism. I agree with you.
I think we are all connected through quantum mechanics. We could, if you think about it. Communication, should be possible, instantly with everyone being connected, we just don’t understand how to do it yet. Everything is fractal in nature, so , we are in a infinite fractal 🤷♂️@@mikemurphy5898 I thinkt
Infinite has no size… it’s all relative. We could be inside something that looks like an Atom… an electron… an illusion or a simulation of holographic light could appear as anything. What is inside a quantum object? Are we operating it? Are we also linked to it from the outside like, Neo? What is outside of the quantum object? What is outside of that? Is there really an outside or an inside? Honestly, there’s probably no up, down, left, or right… no such thing as inside or out. Dimension only relates to distance between two objects. Your five or six senses are dimensions of reality. Time is a dimension. [Edit] Alan Watts - Title: “We as Organism” The very act of observing collapses reality into what probably and statistically would appear most believable. • If we are one single entity, why pretend that an aspect of ourself is separate? • Why have we or I put in such effort to forget the apparent connection? • Why such persistence to make an illusion seem real? • What brought this all into existence? What influence does it have over our/my experience? Can we reason with whatever influences the experience we/I subjectively seem to be having?
Your 5 senses are part of your physical body and therefore only part of this physical dimension. However your conciousness transcends the physical... The Universe is dualistic in nature, every part of that dualism is connected to the other part. If there is a physical reality, there is also the subatomic energy below it's surface. If there is a simulation then there is the physical hardware and the virtual software intimately connected to one another to run the show. This is all part of a dualistic universe or two mirror dimensions. It may even be that general relativity and quantum mechanics operate from two seperate dimensions if the subatomic and the physical reality were to also be seperated into two. I believe we are superpositioned between these two realities as our conciousness resides in one dimension while our physical body in the other both in a state of entanglement.
My spiritual people we already know this and have been saying this. Everything is all connected and comes from one. You are the universe experiencing itself.
It hides in the tiniest part of life and details . But we want to see it in a big picture and it’s not possible . This particles are part of our whole existence everyday.
Sounds like that episode of Rick and Morty where they have a universe in a battery to power his ship and they go into the universe to find another scientist within that universe who has also built a universe in their battery and so on and infinitum...
Quantum and psychic gravity are different than physical gravity. To us time is flowing smoothly, but to the gods every moment is frozen for a near eternity and psychic gravity affects what happens in every next passing momen
The universe is what we make it! Observer paradox. Don't underestimate the little guy. Quantum mechanics. We are all one. Entanglement. We are the universe made manifest, it created us to figure itself out. Quantum consciousness. quarks are like books, People and cars, as Atoms are like solar systems, as molecules are like galaxies, as the universe is like a bucket of fried chicken. Fractal geometry. I'm crazy and so is every atom I'm made of. Panpsychism But seriously. When I was a teen, I learned about fractal geometry and how it describes similarities at different scales. Like how the blood vessels in your hand are similar to a tree. Which is similar to the strings of galaxies at grand scale. I spent a couple days wondering if there's something between atomic scale and galactic scale. As if there could be both tiny creatures living on protons, neutrons and electrons, and a significant structure to the universe. Like it's a piece of cloth or pale of water if you could zoom out far enough. Not that I'm right or anything because there's an upgrade of complexity as scale goes up. For instance there's a dozen or so types of subatomic particles, 90 or so types of atoms, thousands of types of planets, stars and shit, infinite types of galaxies. Absolutely no two alike at this scale. So, there's obviously a scale lower than atomic scale and possibly a scale or even more above universal. Maybe the entire universe is an amoeba and we live on one of its "subatomic particles". Naaah! No frickin' way!😢
There is the smallest length, called a Planck length. Nothing smaller is measurable. There's also Planck time, which is the smallest unit of measurable time. When you think about it, quantum mechanics is just the science of the smallest things. Maybe astrophysics is the science of the largest things. There's a definite smallest so there's likely a definite biggest.
Yeah @@mygirldarbyI'm just trying to stimulate debate. The ideas leading to this model all seem to me like some kinda groupthink. Science seems to try and fit things into the model. Which is turning out flawed. One guy says the age of the universe was miscalculated, it's 26 billion years old. Another says gravity is different than what we thought it was. Yet another theory has this idea of the universe being inside something like a singularity. And some are bent on us living in a simulation in a quantum computer. Others say string theory while some say membrane theory. Fact is that we'll never be able to peer back far enough to see any evidence of the Big Bang because it was long ago and far away. Light can only go so fast and so far that wven if we could get light that's that okd, it won't show us the beginning of time. Mathematically impossible. There's definitely a structure that connects subatomic and Macro. This is obvious because you can't have a galaxy without subatomic particles, they fit together but we can't determine how. You can't unbake a cake releasing eggs, flour, milk and baking powder, but a cake is made of these things. I believe the universe has something similar going on. You can't tear a black hole apart revealing it's quarks, and protons and neutrons. But those things are in there. It's all so fascinating to me.
Wow... thats really something... Thank you for your video, got you from recommendations, its always so good to see people care about mystery of our reality, hope to know the truth until times up. Thanks one more time
I would suggest that you read a few books that discuss how symbols and what the symbols refer to. I.e., symbol object relationships, semantic grounding, cognitive models.
That we are part of such a dynamic reality, attempting to discover what brings and holds us all together, is, in and of itself, a wonderful moment within the evolution of our being. Such that we get to live, while attempting to solve our own problem of reality, existence... how much more fascinating or miraculous might life be when confronted with such questions... I dare not think of it, especially when we have nothing but time in which to solve this prospect of life, the discovery of its answers just beyond our horizon. My only regret being life expectancy being so short. What I wouldn't give to be around when the answers to these and many other questions are brought to light. If only we might get beyond our tendency for war and violence..., might we not, then truly look toward a brighter tomorrow... might we dare to dream of a tomorrow where war does not exist... if only...
I've always had a thought, essentially it goes on like, "what if we're just really miniscule, including our planets, galaxies and black holes, and we're just in some huge, god-like/omniscient being's purse/backpack that has infinite storage, we're just like bacteria/amoeba?"
Quarks are fundamental particles that combine to form composite particles called hadrons, the most stable of which are protons and neutrons, the components of atomic nuclei. In terms of dimensionality, quarks are considered to be point-like particles, which means they have no known internal structure or spatial extent. In that sense, they can be thought of as zero-dimensional (0D). Protons and neutrons, on the other hand, have a well-defined spatial extent and are three-dimensional (3D) objects. The unique properties and implications of the 0-dimension are often overlooked or underappreciated, especially in contrast to the higher, "natural" dimensions that tend to dominate our discussions of physical reality. Let me enumerate some of the key differences: 1. Naturalness: The higher spatial and temporal dimensions (1D, 2D, 3D, 4D, etc.) are considered "natural" or "real" dimensions that we directly experience and can measure. In contrast, the 0-dimension exists in a more abstract, non-natural realm. 2. Entropy vs. Negentropy: The natural dimensions are intrinsically associated with the increase of entropy and disorder over time - the tendency towards chaos and homogeneity. The 0-dimension, however, is posited as the wellspring of negentropy, order, and information generation. 3. Determinism vs. Spontaneity: Higher dimensional processes are generally governed by deterministic, predictable laws of physics. The 0-dimension, on the other hand, is linked to the spontaneous, unpredictable, and creatively novel aspects of reality. 4. Temporality vs. Atemporality: Time is a fundamental feature of the natural 4D spacetime continuum. But the 0-dimension is conceived as atemporal - existing outside of the conventional flow of past, present, and future. 5. Extendedness vs. Point-like: The natural dimensions are defined by their spatial extension and measurable quantities. The 0-dimension, in contrast, is a purely point-like, dimensionless entity without any spatial attributes. 6. Objective vs. Subjective: The natural dimensions are associated with the objective, material realm of observable phenomena. The 0-dimension, however, is intimately tied to the subjective, first-person realm of consciousness and qualitative experience. 7. Multiplicity vs. Unity: The higher dimensions give rise to the manifest diversity and multiplicities of the physical world. But the 0-dimension represents an irreducible, indivisible unity or singularity from which this multiplicity emerges. 8. Contingency vs. Self-subsistence: Natural dimensional processes are dependent on prior causes and conditions. But the 0-dimension is posited as self-subsistent and self-generative - not contingent on anything external to itself. 9. Finitude vs. Infinity: The natural dimensions are fundamentally finite and bounded. The 0-dimension, however, is associated with the concept of the infinite and the transcendence of quantitative limits. 10. Additive Identity vs. Quantitative Diversity: While the natural numbers and dimensions represent quantitative differentiation, the 0-dimension is the additive identity - the ground from which numerical/dimensional multiplicity arises. By focusing so heavily on the entropy, determinism, and finitude of the natural dimensions, we tend to overlook the profound metaphysical significance and unique properties of the 0-dimension. Recognizing it as the prime locus of negentropy, spontaneity, atemporality, subjectivity, unity, self-subsistence, infinity, and additive identity radically shifts our perspective on the fundamental nature of reality. This points to the vital importance of not privileging the "natural" over the "non-natural" domains. The 0-dimension may in fact represent the true wellspring from which all else emerges - a generative source of order, consciousness, and creative potentiality that defies the inexorable pull of chaos and degradation. Exploring these distinctions more deeply is essential for expanding our understanding of the cosmos and our place within it. Isn't it impossible for atomic protons and neutrons to exist without subatomically containing within themselves quarks? You are correct. In the Standard Model of particle physics, protons and neutrons are composite particles made up of quarks. Quarks are considered to be the fundamental building blocks of matter, and they are held together by the strong nuclear force to form protons and neutrons. Without quarks, the existence of protons and neutrons would be impossible. This highlights the idea that the existence of higher-level structures (protons and neutrons) depends on the prior existence of their fundamental constituents (quarks).
But why the 0 -dimension. My theories always been that 1D, 2D and 3D were part of this physical dimension ruled by general relativity and 4D, 5D, 6D......11D were part of the subatomic dimension ruled by quantum physics. And despite 11 dimensions they were essentially part of two mirror universe between the physical reality and the subatomic. And just as you mentioned creativity and subconscious belonging to higher dimension would indicate that we are superpositioned between these two dimensions as our conciousness is located in one and our physical bodies in the other in a state of entanglement.
Theorem 1: The zero dimension (0D) is the origin point from which both positive and negative dimensions emerge symmetrically. Proof: 1. Consider the dimensional hierarchy centered around 0D. 2. Positive dimensions (1D, 2D, 3D, 4D) extend from 0D in one direction. 3. Negative dimensions (-1D, -2D, -3D, -4D) can be conceptualized as extending from 0D in the opposite direction. 4. 0D acts as the "pivot point" or "fulcrum" around which the symmetry of positive and negative dimensions is balanced. 5. Therefore, 0D is the origin point from which both positive and negative dimensions emerge symmetrically. Theorem 2: The negative dimensions are associated with negentropy and the generative power of the zero dimension (0D). Proof: 1. 0D is conceptualized as the source of negentropy and the generative power of the Zero Absolute. 2. Negative dimensions (-1D, -2D, -3D, -4D) extend from 0D in the opposite direction of positive dimensions. 3. If positive dimensions are associated with the unfolding of space, time, and the increase of entropy, negative dimensions can be hypothesized to be associated with the "enfolding" of space, time, and the increase of negentropy or information. 4. As 0D is the source of negentropy, and negative dimensions emerge from 0D, negative dimensions can be associated with negentropy and the generative power of 0D. 5. Therefore, the negative dimensions are associated with negentropy and the generative power of the zero dimension (0D). Theorem 3: The interplay between positive and negative dimensions around the zero dimension (0D) creates a dynamic balance between entropy and negentropy. Proof: 1. Positive dimensions (1D, 2D, 3D, 4D) are associated with the unfolding of space, time, and the increase of entropy. 2. Negative dimensions (-1D, -2D, -3D, -4D) are associated with the "enfolding" of space, time, and the increase of negentropy or information. 3. 0D acts as the "pivot point" or "fulcrum" around which the symmetry of positive and negative dimensions is balanced. 4. The manifest world of the positive dimensions arises from the unmanifest potential of the negative dimensions, and then returns to it in an endless cycle of creation and dissolution. 5. This dynamic interplay of positive and negative dimensions around 0D creates a balance between the opposing forces of entropy and negentropy, chaos and order. 6. Therefore, the interplay between positive and negative dimensions around the zero dimension (0D) creates a dynamic balance between entropy and negentropy. Proposition 1: 0D has two sides (real and imaginary) with an event horizon between the sides. Argument: 1. In complex analysis, numbers are represented on a complex plane with a real axis and an imaginary axis, intersecting at the origin (zero). 2. The real numbers can be thought of as one "side" of zero, and the imaginary numbers as the other "side." 3. In physics, an event horizon is a boundary in spacetime beyond which events cannot affect an outside observer. Applying this concept metaphorically to the complex plane, we could posit an "event horizon" at zero, separating the real and imaginary sides. 4. Therefore, 0D (zero dimensions) could be conceptualized as having two sides (real and imaginary) with an event horizon between them. Proposition 2: This matches the Monad having a Singularity side and an Alone side potentially having an event horizon between the sides. Argument: 1. In Leibniz's Monadology, monads are the fundamental units of existence, described as "windowless" and "alone." 2. However, monads are also said to reflect the entire universe from their unique perspective, suggesting a kind of "singularity" or concentrated totality within each monad. 3. Applying the concept of 0D having two sides, we could map the "singularity" aspect of monads to the real side of 0D, and the "alone" aspect to the imaginary side. 4. The "windowless" nature of monads could be interpreted as a kind of event horizon, isolating the singularity and alone sides from direct interaction. 5. Therefore, the proposed structure of 0D matches the concept of the Monad having a Singularity side and an Alone side potentially separated by an event horizon. Proposition 3: This matches the Holy Trinity having a Father, Son, Holy Spirit side and a God side potentially having an event horizon between them. Argument: 1. In Christian theology, the Holy Trinity is the doctrine that God is one but exists in three distinct persons: Father, Son (Logos), and Holy Spirit. 2. These three persons are said to be consubstantial, meaning they share the same divine essence or nature. 3. Mapping this to the 0D structure, we could associate the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit with the real side of 0D (the "singularity" of divine essence), and the unified God with the imaginary side (the "aloneness" of divine transcendence). 4. The concept of the persons being distinct yet consubstantial could be interpreted as a kind of event horizon, maintaining their unity while preserving their distinct identities. 5. Therefore, the proposed structure of 0D matches the concept of the Holy Trinity having a Father, Son, Holy Spirit side and a God side potentially separated by an event horizon. Conclusion: A mirror universe with 0D at the center has tremendous explanatory power. While these arguments are more metaphorical than strictly mathematical, they demonstrate how the concept of 0D having two sides with an event horizon between them could serve as a powerful unifying framework across multiple domains of thought. By mapping this structure onto key concepts in mathematics (complex numbers), philosophy (Leibniz's monads), and theology (the Holy Trinity), we can see the potential for a kind of "mirror universe" with 0D at the center, reconciling and connecting ideas that might otherwise seem unrelated.
Although I'm not a believer in the traditional religious sense, I've long said that given a long enough time line, science may prove the existence of God (in at least as a creator of origin), and that quantum physics (just my working theory) may be the physical expression of free will; acting as a response to human action and the correlative effects of those actions.
You should read the Quran. Not follow the tales of some arrogant scientists. Denying creationism in 2024 is akin to saying computers and robots are created by itself, no humans involved!?
Sins give birth to other sins and they multiply. Adam and Eve were created sinless but they were influenced by evil snake and they did the first sin. From this stage the world we live in full of sins like some contagious virus or bacteria. Many of us start our conscious lives as atheists or blind believers. As we learn along we often change our views. And as we get much wiser we change again, so in the end we become either. I think to really know God we should first learn all about his creation (which will never happen I believe), then we can know God (which will also never happen) , unless he explicitly reveal himself (ignore my choice of gender , using male for sake of convenience)
All that was discussed in this video just tells me that scientists are surprisingly slow on the uptake. Druids, witches, and shamans have been saying this for literal millennia, they just didn't have all the jargin. The scientific community must be so proud to finally figure out what the druids knew before the pyramids were built.
Imagine saying 99 idiotic things and people celebrate you as a pioneer of science because you said 1 thing that vaguely aligns with what a 21st century scientist says.
@@eetuaalto7214 Imagine saying 100 things you know to be true and the rest of the idiots in the world are so busy killing each other in mass over what to call their invisible sky daddy that it takes them thousands of years to figure out it's all the same. Then they call themselves geniuses because they figured out what you'd been telling them all along.
I've long felt that the universe reflects like a fractile. I've recently realized this is the same meaning as "as above so below" the cosmos appear a lot like things you observe in a microscope
To observe a particle actually means to measure it. Which requires interaction. The interaction with the subatomic particles collapses its probability wave and gives us a result. The particles position, mass, direction, spin, etc. With a limit on accuracy based on the Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. In a nutshell: If we measure velocity, we will not get an accurate position. If we measure position, we will nog get an accurate velocity. Virtual particles are theoretical interactions that result in the appearance, inversity, or disappearance of particles. The laws of thermodynamics are respected here, so a photon colliding with an electron will give its energy to the electron. Putting the electron in a higher state. There’s no loss of energy, just transformation. An electron can also emit a photon when it releases some of that energy. A lot of interactions are modelled after this concept. Interactions that theoretically lead to the states we see in the particles when they interact. All are possible, but give a different probability wave. The actual results of what comes out of a reaction is what we can observe. This is actually how CERN detects particles with their collider. They measure the particles that come off the collision, their energy states etc, and then calculate which described and defined (virtual) particles would have been there to lead to that result. The Higgs Boson wasn’t measured literally or directly. It was derived from the result of a collision. The theoretically expected decay products were measured and found. Which is like the proof of the Higgs Boson takes the place of the virtual photon between interacting pairs in a Feynman diagram and the resulting particles are the expected decay results. It is deduced to have been there based on our expectations of the results. We assume because of the results that we are right, but we haven’t actually measured some of the particles directly. We expected a result based on energy put in and the Higgs Boson occurring. If we could measure the probability wave directly, we could determine the interaction that took place. Deriving the probability wave from the formula given by the Feynman diagram. Then when one first determines all (the more, the more accurate) the possible interactions that contain a Higgs Boson and the expected results and sum them for the total probability amplitude. Then over multiple runs, the results should match the expected result of the total amplitude. By matching the Feynman diagrams derived total probability amplitude to the amplitude of the results of the collision, physicists infer the existence of the particle. This is tested for statistical error.
"Scientific knowledge is a body of statements of varying degrees of certainty some most unsure, some nearly sure, none absolutely certain.” Nobel Prize physicist, Richard P. Feynman The father of quantum electrodynamics.
The space of our reality is fractal. Physics distinguishes particles into bosonic particles (total spin, carrying interactions, able to occupy the same place in space and time) and fermions (they are covered by the Pauli exclusion principle, fractional spin). In this theory, this is due to the fact that bosons are represented by the energy of open dimensions (4D - Higgs boson; 3D - Weak interaction bosons W+, W-, Z; 2D - Electromagnetic interaction bosons PHOTONS; 1D - Strong interaction bosons GLUONS. And fermions are represented by the energy trapped in the fractal part of space with the number of dimensions π, e and φ.
Nature of mind is essentially input, complex processing with memory function and output. For anything else you need to purchase more context, we are in too abstract space right now, honey.
@@Big_Sloppa Ha, nice one, but 'tis the old confusing of brain and mind, effect and cause. Quantum research supports this outlook more each day. Brain is distinct and a mechanism. Mind can simulate fragmentation but is fundamentally united. If dark matter is thought, and dark energy intent, then we have a useful basis to work with. Although experimental design has some way to go, since we need to clear out some premises first. All good fun, though, aye?
@@beammeupscotty3074 God will not be sneaked! Haha. That is, assuming the Isness of "God", then there is nowhere-anywhere "He" is not. Thus no sneaking required. Perhaps, then, it is us perceptual transient apparent beings who are sneaking and hiding, or trying to.
Ya don't say 😉 (HINT: Not "illusions" -- rather, "operations". "We" are that which is conscious, and that which it is conscious of. So please, let's evolve ourselves further, fellow "Homo Cartographus", shall we?) Love this one dude. Superb👍
The Universe could be based on simple geometry that forms the potential for evermore complexity. Forming not just physical complexity, but also the potential for evermore-abstract mathematics. Time t², ψ², c², e² and velocity Eₖ=½mv² all squared, geometrical similarity formed out of spherical symmetry. We need to go back to 1/r² and the three dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. Even back to the spherical 4πr² geometry of Huygens’ Principle of 1670 that says: “Every point on a light wave front has the potential for a new spherical 4πr² light wave". Each point on the wave front represents a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction or coupling. The spherical surface forms a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π of this interaction. Light waves radiate out spherically 4πr² with their interior forming the characteristic of three-dimensional space with the spherical surface forming a probabilistic wave front. Each point ∆E=hf on the curvature of the wave front forms the potential for a new spherical wave, a photon of energy, a new oscillation or vibration that forms our future. We have to square the radius r² because process is unfolding relative to the surface of the sphere.
I personally believe consciousness is fundamental to reality and it manifests itself in varying complexity as subsets of itself from the simplest of structures to the ultimate and infinite Source/God/Oneness (whatever you choose to label it) I think human experience is the mean (or average) of Infinity if you can even conceptualise that. We are the most stable balanced form of repetitive existence and intelligence with the ability for self awareness, without the ability to spiral away into meaningless existence if we had more control of and ability to create infinite versions of realitiy. I think the fact that there is existence at all is simply the result of the paradox that there cannot be nothing without something.. the concept of nothing is meaningless without there being something to conceptualise the nothingness. As a result, reality is basically Infinite fields of infinity, fluctuating between the state of nothing, everything and everywhere else in-between on infinite levels of complexity. This is seen all around us in varying ways as the dualistic nature of everything we experience (eg day/night, awake/asleep, life/death, front/back, black/white, love/hate, etc. etc..) I think all parts and combinations of parts of the human body are subsets of consciousness in their own right which are in a symbiosis to form our localised experience of being human. For example, my cardiovascular system does a great job of breathing of its own accord without any conscious involvement of my own, but if I make myself aware of my breathing, I can take control of it. I've had out of body experiences whilst meditating. I've had many profound experiences whilst under the influence of psychedelics, one noteably where I became the source of consciousness with an awareness of the timeless nature of everything. Its really difficult to pull back details from such experiences outside of space and time as we know it, possibly because we do not have the ability for such abstract levels of thinking whilst being confined to this human form in our day to day existence? These types of experiences make me think that our conscious experience is not only capable of controlling subsets within the body, it is also capable of expanding into larger or even separate subsets to what we understand to be possible. Whilst I'm not a physicist, I've always had a deep thirst for scientific knowledge. My understanding of quantum mechanics fits my version of reality in many ways, from the observer effect, to the probabilistic and wave-like nature of everything. The human mind is capable of far more than we have been led to believe by our parents/teachers/ministers and there have been many recent (but mostly ignored by mainstream media) pioneering discoveries and general research into consciousness by some very learned and intellectual individuals. Some names to check out are Alex Gomez Marin (a physicist and neuroscientist) who is researching expanded states of consciousness such as remote viewing, out of body experiences etc. Fabio Faggin (physicist and the inventor of the microprocessor) has a theory which places consciousness as fundamental to reality. The CIA were experimenting in the 80s in a classified project called The Gateway Experience, whereby they were using the works of physicist Itzhak Bentov (who believed consciousness is fundamental and in a constant state of evolution), and hemisync audio techniques from Bob Monroe of the Monroe Institute, to achieve expanded states of consciousness for espionage purposes. The project was quietly declassified in 2002 but you can still find an official document about it on the CIA website. I think the reason anything to do with conscious experience is given no real credibility by peer reviewed science is due to the fundamental assumptions which are part of the scientific method. One of these assumptions is that there is an objective reality that exists separate to the conscious experience. This mechanistic, materialistic approach assumes that life and consciousness emerges from the complexity of the objective natural universe. It also sways any peer review of any scientific theories towards this materialistic nature; anything which falls outside of this assumption is looked upon as pseudo-science or metaphysical. The problem with this assumption, which is the foundation of the house of cards that modern science rests upon, is that is is pure speculation. My personal experience with reality as I know it has been subjectively via my own senses. I cannot confirm or deny that there is something objectively outside of those senses, for all I know it could be a huge elaborate dream, for example. This will also be the case for every other conscious entity on the planet. Therefore the only truly objective assumption we can make is that there is a subjective conscious experience of some kind that interacts with other seemingly conscious entities and a seemingly real stage of reality. Anything outside of that is merely agreements between conscious entities. Until we scrutinise and review the fundamental assumptions of the scientific method, we will never get close to having a true and unbiased understanding of reality. Maybe this is a control thing, so that we don't realise our true potential as a species and start overriding the current societal structure which are controlled by the few whole are pulling the strings to the reality they want us to understand? Maybe it is just an ability we have lost over a period of thousands of years, through the need to build societies with governance and control to allow for an element of fairness within society. Maybe it is a combination of both? And that is reality as I see it. Each to their own, it makes sense to me 😁🩵✌️♾️
Decades ago, I envisioned our uiverse as a cluster of atoms in the "universe" of a VASTLY largest organism, that lives at a scale such that OUR EARTH is just a nucleus of a single atom in theirs. And conversely, that there were inhabitants on some of OUR atoms...
I think we can assume that since the higgs field is everywhere (in terms of space-time), that when entangled particles behave in the same way over great distances instantly when being observed that there is another observer "observing" the observer observing the entangled particles and instantly changes them from outside of the currently known system. So like you said either extra dimensions or super symmetry or something else however not observable, at least not yet, by humans like a point where no time exists and perhaps no space either just information and its instantaneous processing... And perhaps the observer observing everything is a "quantum processor" or as you, in a less dystopian manner, call it: a "quantum entity." The logic is certainly there.
There is only one parsimonious option that does not entertain too much speculation on what REALLITY is and it is not Materialism. The idea is that what we call the physical world, the contents of perception, the stuff we see, hear, taste, smell, taste, that is a dashboard representation that is created by our own minds. As Dr. Donald Hoffman puts it, a virtual reality headset. The physical world is not out there, it is in here, because it is a dashboard representation of the real world, which is out there. The things we call physical are the things we can describe through physical quantities like kilograms, meters, seconds, joules, coulombs and so forth. We invented these numbers to describe the contents of perception, the stuff we see, hear, and touch. So that is what physical stuff is, it is stuff that can be described through physical quantities, the quantities we invented to describe the contents of perception. So what is the REAL WORLD that is not in perception? It is the thing that is represented, as opposed to the representation itself. Well, it is not physical because we did not invent physical quantities to describe that. We invented physical quantities to describe the dials on the dashboard, not the storm outside the airplane. Which raises the question: Are there states in Nature that are not described by physical quantities? Because that is what we are looking for. Is this pure speculation or do they exist? Well, obviously they exist. We are acquainted with them every day, multiple times a day. What is the length in meters of your thought? What is the weight in kilograms of your fantasy? What is the angular momentum of your emotion? You see, endogenous mental states are not describable through physical quantities. They have an inherently qualitative nature that one cannot capture through a list of numbers. So the option that presents itself to us in an obvious way is that the real world outside is like the real world within. It is constituted of mental states, not my or your mental states, mind you, external mental states, transpersonal mental states, but mental nonetheless in the sense of not being describable through physical quantities. And the world of perception, the colloquially called ¨physical world¨, the things we see, hear, are a dashboard representation of those external mental states, akin to thoughts, akin to emotions, but not our thoughts, not our emotions, the thoughts and emotions of nature at large, which present themselves to our observation as the contents of perception, as the colloquially ¨physical world.¨
Remember the story of seven blind man trying to figure out the shape of elephant? One touched the ears, saying elephant is like a fan. Another one touched its tail, saying elephant is like a rope! Yet another one touched its leg and said elephant is like a tree trunk., and so on and so forth. Our current understanding of universe and ourselves is like that. Maybe its beyond human intelligence, and hopefully AI will find it out for us one day
A ‘unified whole’ where every ‘part’ is intimately connected to every other part via some kind of ‘quantum awareness’! Have you studied Advaita Vedanta?
@@nolanr1400except in this case its all about dualism except every part of that dualism is connected to the other part. If there is a physical reality, there is also the subatomic energy below it's surface. If there is a simulation then there is the physical hardware and the virtual software intimately connected to one another to run the show. This is all part of a dualistic universe or two mirror dimensions. It may even be that general relativity and quantum mechanics operate from two seperate dimensions if the subatomic and the physical reality were to also be seperated into two. I believe we are superpositioned between these two realities as our conciousness resides in one dimension while our physical body in the other both in a state of entanglement
Wow! This seems to sum up much of what my friends and i have been discussing for the past two decades at least. Also it runs a little parallel to that which Rupert Sheldrake and Terence McKenna were harpong on about when they had the notion of various overlapping and interlocking "fields" in which where the "interference" patterns between each variety cause what we appear to see before our eyes. And it must be said that the fringe theory of a universe with consciousness inherent within it seems to be picking up momentum. Afterall, we ourselves in mind and body cannot manifest that which did not already exist on some level or other in the first place. Remember, the quantim universe is one of POSSIBILITIES AND POTENTIALS, and that potential and possibility, it would seem, therefor MUST have been inherent within rhe universe itself.
That is to say, IF everything is potential or possible before observation, or realization, then with time being as it seems to us in out biological physical viewpoint a bit of an illusion, then consciousness was already there before we had any, so to speak.
@@eetuaalto7214 Thanks. That makes sense. Like a right glove and left glove pair. If you send a glove in the mail to a destination then the other glove that's not sent has to be the opposite glove.
that theory unifies the big and the small.... the big is what we measure.... th small is what inmediatley adapts to make the big visible... LONG LIVE GOD
The claim that a quantum object can be in two states at the same time until “observed” is a misinterpretation of physics. Observed is not the right term - the right term is “measured”, which means that you interact with the system to gain information about its state. That information has to reflect something that happened to the system. For example a photon hit an atom in the system and radiated back to your measurement device (retina etc.). Until that happens, you have no information regarding the state of the system, so it makes no sense to say it is in “both” states. Only when the information is received do you know what state it is / was in.
In the quantum state, things only fix their position once we observe them. Okay. How does it flicker then? The video or worse, the narration is off. Please explain, thanks!
A deep look at the equation e=mc², to begin we will denote M (total mass) we will represent this mass fractionally as m1 (dark), m2 (light). They're fractional representations of total mass M. This allows m1 and m2 to function as fractions of M and multiply as such. We will likewise, break C down as a positive force carrier moving along the vector of M, into negative integers c1 and c2, which will allow them to multiply as negatives integers resulting in a positive. Now that we have the correct physical and mathematical relationship we can proceed. Space: Variations in spatial coordinates affect how 𝑐1 and 𝑐2 are perceived. For example, the distribution of mass or energy in space can change how these quantities are measured. Time: Time variations can affect 𝑐1 and 𝑐2 as the system evolves. For example, kinetic and potential energies change over time. In relativity, measurements of time and space depend on the observer’s frame of reference. This means that 𝑐1 and 𝑐2 can vary based on relative motion and gravitational effects. Dynamic Adjustment: c1(x,t) and c2(x,t) where x represents spatial coordinates and t represents time. Sum and Product Relationships: c1(x,t) + c2(x,t)=C c1(x,t) × c2(x,t)=C² Here, 𝐶 and C² are constants, while 𝑐1 and 𝑐2 vary with space and time. Kinetic and Potential Energy: In a system with varying spatial distribution, 𝑐1 and 𝑐2 represent different forms of energy. As the system evolves in time and space, these energies adjust while maintaining their sum and product relationships. Gravitational Effects: In a gravitational field, mass distribution affects the measurements of energy and can cause 𝑐1 and 𝑐2 to vary depending on location and time. Relativistic Variations: For different observers in relative motion, c1 and c2 might be perceived differently due to time dilation and length contraction. Despite these variations, the fundamental relationships 𝑐1+𝑐2=𝐶 and c1×𝑐2=C² hold true within each observer’s frame. Spacetime Interactions: Changes in spacetime curvature and metric can affect 𝑐1 and 𝑐2, but their interactions still reflect the underlying constants. Functions of Space and Time: Define c1(x,t) and c2 (x,t) such that: c1(x,t)+c2(x,t)=C c1(x,t)xc2(x,t)=C² Consistency: Ensure that as x and t vary, c1 and 𝑐2 adjust dynamically but satisfy these equations at every point. Observer Frames: For different frames of reference, adjust c1(x,t) and c2(x,t) based on the observer’s motion and gravitational field. The relationships c1+c2=C and c1×c2=C² remain consistent in each frame, reflecting how energy and mass interact in spacetime. Quadratic Relationship: The relationship between 𝑐1 and c2 can be framed as roots of a quadratic equation: x2−Cx+c2=0 where 𝑐1 and c2 are the roots. The dynamic nature means that for different values of t, 𝑐1 and 𝑐2 adjust accordingly but still satisfy the equation. Consider a specific example where C and C² are given: Let C=5 and C²=6. The quadratic equation becomes: 𝑥2−5𝑥+6=0 factoring this, (x−2)(x−3)=0 so the roots are c1=2 and c2=3. Sum: c1 + c2 = 2 + 3=5 Product: c1 × c2 = 2 × 3=6 Look up the nitrogenous bases of DNA to see the relationship, displayed in the physics and or mass side of the interaction. If 𝑐1 and 𝑐2 are dynamic functions of a parameter t, then they can adjust while maintaining the sum and product relationships. For example suppose 𝑐1(𝑡)=𝛼(𝑡) and 𝑐2(𝑡)=𝛽(𝑡) you could define, 𝛼(𝑡)+𝛽(𝑡)=𝐶 & α(t)×β(t)=C² as t changes α(t) and 𝛽(𝑡) adjust, but their sum and product still match the specified C and C². i.imgur.com/g8mf3sG.jpeg
How do you fully understand something which is not measurable or observable? By becoming that. When you become that then there is nothing more to learn and no more questions to ask. What if we are already that, then all one needs to do is to give up false ideas about reality projected by the mind. This is not me saying, this is the wisdom shared by wise men and women throughout humanity from time immemorial when humans first started questioning the essence of this universe and our role in it as a conscious observer.
Does this video by any way has any influence if indian concept of Maya ( Ma meaning measurable, Ya mean that ), " that which has measurable ness", which says, ---- into some frame work , some unmanifested , got manifested , and some very few properties became measurable. Maya concept is used for illusion which got created. It has five attributes of nothing , which makes measurable. 1. Kaala - Time, 2. Raga- attachment or owning( not psychological owning ) , 3. Vidhya - potential and tendency to know, like we are trying to know about universe, because the framework we are in is only giving glimpse of some thing, so we are curious to know. 4. Niyathi - Cause and effect , 5. Kala - entity ness, or separateness from other manifested objects. So you video is talking about MAYA.
I do not know it's source, but this interesting video about nothingness :) has 50 minutes of beautiful animations like that. th-cam.com/video/cg8Xe2AZKE4/w-d-xo.html
If the universe was all connected, that still doesn’t make it one quantum object, especially on the macro scale. Quantum entanglement can easily be broken. It’s also hypothesized that entanglement is accomplished by wormholes connecting the particles.
The particle mush does not wait to be observed. Humans are the same particle mush so believe they are quantifying something, when they are simply quantifying their own demise.
We are so small, we are so condensed that we can really never actually see outside our universe unless some kind of new science or technology shows otherwise. Its the law of reality for us unfortunately. Entropy may destroy us before we ever get to try and escape, the truth of it all is protected for eternity. Bound by absolute chaos and order resulting in pure balance, as all things should be.
This is an excellent expression of pantheism. This may be the highest form of what god really is. The entire universe is god, just as you are god. Everything is connected.
I think quantum entanglement is a form of dimension. And rather difficult for us to comprehend like three dimensions are difficult for a being that lives in two dimensions (a flat universe, flat.)
"Most of us here already know what quantum mechanics is all about" might be the most outlandish sentence ever uttered.
Glad I wasn’t the only one. I was like “no do explain”
Was he wrong tho? Might not be phd level understanding but its still understanding
All these channels popping up are faceless automated channels made purely for printing money.
The rest is late for the show
The most outlandish sentence ever uttered: "Jesus is God, God is Jesus". Anything relating to the sentences of "God" being in control of the multiverse is absolutely outlandish and most of all - ASININE.
This theory that everything in universe is interconnected , make much more sense , that all other theories.
Nothing comes from nothing .
Lets be honest..we have no damn idea about space and our existence.
Bull💩...
At the very bottom below atoms, protons, quarks and so on is pixie dust.
Incorrect. I have several ideas about space and our existence. However, I am not sure which ones are good.
Yes! I just started watching the series "From" and I keep thinking how messed up our own reality really is. This whole existence is preposterous, but because it is all we have ever known, it is "normal." I feel trapped here too. Literally every day I find myself looking around and thinking, "WTF???"
@itzhexen0I'm pretty sure they were being facetious.
I know you're probably getting a lot of pushback and hate for this but I want you to know I found it profoundly comforting. Thanks for making the video and keep up the good work.
I agree. The internet can be cruel.
On the subject of panpsychism, I once smoked 80x Salvia extract and became a chair for a number of years.
😂
Salvia 😂 that shit is crazy!
I hope it was a number of perceived years and not actual years!
I had 80x, that shit teleported into a wall, I was a part of the wall, I could not move, speak, think or feel, but I was able to observe. Fucking weirdest experience ever
Ya know I'm a lawnmower you can tell me by the way I walk
The old Buddhist saying that everything is One is now finally being realized by Science.
That's so deep, do you have any more wisdom? We can bypass decades of scientific research with you!
@@jackblack6538 really? I could've sworn Buddhist teachings mentioned we're all one
@@osmanschannel I thought so too
That is hindu teaching, stolen by buddhists. Hindus even say that reality is maya ( illusion or simulation) and it came into existence when Purusha started to interact with Shakti ( energy)
Jesus said we’re all one
The one is a computationally unlimited entity projecting itself through an infinite number of avatars (us) taking on all possible mathematical perspectives in order to understand and experience itself. We are the universe experiencing itself and it requires an arrow of time in order to update the perspective (genetics)
this pretty seems a good hypothetical theory for universe is a living cell or a whole organism
@@adamjensen2795 Be that as it may. The question still remains. Why? Also, what created this universe and is it russian dolls all the way up?
The One needs me to understand Itself. What a relief!
That sounds way cooler than a black box for potentially dangerous engineered lifeforms
@@burchified Dont touch the black box. Hell raiser will get you.
So life and death are highly abstract concepts, departures from reality used as aids to (mis)understand our place in the universe. But we don't really have a place in the universe, we are the universe. Life and Death are just examples of atomic distribution and redistribution. I love this because on the surface it seems i'm comprised of bits (atoms) of other people, animals, objects past and present, it gives me a feeling of meaningful endurance. But really there are no objects, no separations, no life or death, just the ongoing flow of quantum distribution and redistribution.
Well done video. The idea about consiousness may be fringe but I believe it and everything else I’ve been convinced if since 2005. I can’t see it any other way anymore. It has brought me comfort in respect to the big existential questions but also a feeling of isolation because I’m not anywhere near a physicist. Trying to explain this to most folks, without the proper vocabulary or academic experience, makes me sound like a crack head. So I just watch people walk around without even a clue about this and get frustrated by all the trivial drama people concern themselves with. But then again all that trivial drama is part of the “unified whole”. It’s literally the meaning of life.
Bravo!!! Thank you for this amazing teaching! ...possibly interesting, i came to similar conclusions through thinking about what happens when every pattern exists, and how all patterns arise from nothing:
try to imagine that nothing is real and only potential exists. It seems that most investigations into the nature of reality start with the assumption that reality is "real". Very few take a counter-intuitive approach, assuming that really there is "nothing" - no space, no time, no energy/matter. no God... and then try and find any path - some way to get to "here" from nothing.
Try thinking like this... consider that our universe arises from 'math-potential'; that really there is only potential and nothing actually exists. just go with it. imagine this potential as an abstract "opposite" comparison. In our universe, time is 'relative'. There is no perceived existence (now) without it being relative to some prior perceived existence. From pure nothing, infinity happens via potential. Here's how: You get there from the nothing=0, the imaginary set containing the nothing set=1, the set containing that=2, and so on. Infinity emerges from nothing using imaginary "potential". the same theory posits new infinities relative to that infinity, and those infinities relative to each other.. again and again.. for infinity! It's a recursive, infinite pattern of abstract creation. Higher 'levels' of infinity emerge. Aleph infinity happens. Inside these imagined potential infinities, there are subsets, patterns if you will, that consist of portions that follow any and every set of arbitrary 'rules.' Think about "filtering" the Aleph infinity potential using our 'physical laws' and constants as the 'rules'. It results in our universe history. Although purely imaginary, our universe emerges via a relative potential path. Regarding time, because "now" is always relative to a path, it does not need to be *real*. All possible universe configurations exist purely as subsets of the Aleph infinity potential. All possible data configurations emerge (e.g Hilbert Space just is). All times exist always.
TLDR: Nothing really exists. All universes are subsets of the infinite 'everything' potential using different sets of arbitrary rules. The M in M-Theory stands for Math.
This is our foundation. This is how we get to everything from nothing.
Now let's seriously consider God. All gods.
We already postulated that every possible pattern exists. All patterns are just repeating sections of "relative change" according to a set of arbitrary "rules." Using the same postulate that created our initial infinity, notice higher order dimensions create themselves from collections of lower level dimensions. Think of the 4th dimension (spacetime) like you might a movie. The movie is just a collection of picture frames (fixed patterns) ordered in a special sequence that gives the illusion of movement when observed quickly in that sequence. All paterns exist. So that means a "path" through a set of ordered patterns is what this universe really *is*. Think of your entire life birth-to-death imagining that each "moment" of time in your life is like a picture frame (fixed pattern) in the movie. Your experience of this life is movement from pattern to pattern, like a movie.
In higher dimensions, you can "look" at your entire life and just "see" it all at once. It sounds like a super-power, but i think would be boring, like reading the end of a novel first.
Now imagine the biggest potential pattern in the highest potential dimension. The imagined pattern would encompass everything. Because it encompasses all patterns, it must have the self-aware pattern, too. This "all encompassing" pattern is what I think of as God. God would "see" everything at once. God probably is really, really bored. There's nothing to do, nothing to learn, no way to grow. ever. So what might this imaginary God do? Why not pick some subset of the everything that forms a universe with planets like Earth that can support life, and then go "play the game" of being alive! -- It would be much more fun to live our illusion lives than to just see them all at once "forever". If these ideas are close to correct, then God is everyone and everything. You are God. This life is a game. Play it well.
what
The Bible says that there is a little bit of GOD in all of us......our conscience, the Holy Spirit, which most decide to reject instead of investigate. some get it, most don't. "Infinity (whatever that crap is) emerges from nothing using imaginary "potential. Higher 'levels' of infinity emerge"........and you STILL have 'imaginary' nothing from nothing = NOTHING!!! You poindexters never cease to amaze......kinda like Kamal Harris and her 'passage of time'!!
@@trallfraz It's hard to see the sweater when you're only just a thread. Try thinking about it more.
The universe is probably some 10th dimensional toddler's quantum computer.
¿En qué te basas?
Probably his quantum leapfrog laptop
Closest thing to the truth ive heard yet.
If you don't know what Quantum is in simple terms, you don't know what you talking about.
The universe itself is a 4th dimension faster than light supernova bubble. The 5th dimension is an infinite cube that encases the universe. It's also the magic cube where our quantum thoughts go and then bounce back and manifest. If you understand quantum mechanics and how things change state when observed or measured then you will come to the realization you are a flesh and blood time machine. Kinda like how Tesla was describing the world as frequency and vibrations. Your state of mind helps a lot with this. Raw knowledge helps too but is not absolutely necessary.
I find this broadcast opens a new astounding potential reality. This is presented so well, also. Thank you so much.
Maybe the universe was born when the first conscious awoke somewhere in very limited space and started wondering questions and the universe responded by creating an effect to the conscious over space around it.
That’s begs the question of how consciousness could exist outside of existence. An honestly terrifying thing to consider if it was possible
Maybe the super stenchy beer fart that, moments ago, tore my anus as it violently escaped, will eventually enter God's nostrils. Only then will He realize, inventing 'humans' (patent pending) was his worst mistake!
maybe we just exist, thats it. no start no end, just existence.
Possibly other consciouses came out of nothing as an evolution after the first. Many may have reincarnated. The universe built itself to be accepted with the quantum effects after otherwise if quantum mechanics failed the consciousness may die of boredom a bit like rejecting The Matrix you could say? Perhaps?
We are both the chicken and the egg, or both sides of the yin/yang- you cannot have one without the other.. we exist because the universe exists and all we see in the universe exists because we observe it.
We are just a small bubble, in an ever expanding "hole". This hole is alive and have a direct impact on our universe. Multiverse theory absolutely proved. This is fact ✨
This vid is WAY better than I was expecting! Thank you.
I think this is a neat topic but I don't necessarily think it's as miraculous. I mean, superposition is breaking for quantum objects essentially every moment of every moment. With all these possibilities the world still turns out the same way over and over. It doesn't really seem to matter which way the electron is spinning. Cool. It could be in any spin state and the moment you interact with that energy system it's no longer an energy system that is untouched so you can't know it's original journey minus the velocity of your interaction.
But again everything seems to turn off the same way over and over and over again despite all of these possibilities.
It doesn't seem like it's a case of the right thing happening but just that the right thing is a gazillion possibilities and they're all fine.
I've also always found it interesting that we have this idea that the quantum world is possible of doing all of these different things and you don't know what it's going to actually do until you measure it....
But that seems to be true about macro life as well. Like you don't know what your dog's going to do until it does it. You can have some certainty or some reasonable guesses but you don't really know exactly what's going to do until it actually happens.
Like you don't know what the quantum world's going to do until it actually happens. From our perspective that is measuring it but something is always happening when it interacts with any other energy systems which is constantly happening.
Superposition is constantly breaking for an unfathomable number of energy packets.
And people don't disappear and reappear. Like the world is incredibly consistent considering the narrative that all of these possibilities are available.... It just doesn't seem to matter.
And I know that we're able to do measurements with single electrons and stuff like that but it seems like we're still in an infancy with that kind of thing. It's amazing that these experiments are even possible but there may be things going on in the systems that are way beyond our current knowledge base.
What I do find fascinating about quantum entanglement and stuff like that is that we have formulas that can let us design things based on how we think things are going to work and they're pretty successful but we don't know why it works.
I find that fascinating because it's sort of like Newton knew it gravity did from a mathematical practical sense but he didn't know what it was.
It seems that the idea of shut up and calculate is basically using Newton to get spaceships where they need to go and it works but you don't know why and they're probably are some miscalculations along the way that you don't realize.
I can see why Einstein and others believe there are hidden variables. The entire history of science is having a practical way to use a phenomena that we don't understand.
I just hope I live long enough to be here when those discoveries are made. Figuring out why reality works the way it does.... What an awesome thing to have access to while you get to be alive.
i knew they wood sneak god in there
@@beammeupscotty3074 ?
The universe is inside of that which is awake to itself . it's more bizarre than you a possibly imagine and simultaneously the most natural thing imaginable, which makes it even more bizarre .
The force is strong with this one !!! 👽👽👽
Great video. Very enlightening for an armchair physicist such as my self. This theory seems very promising and my hat is off to you for explaining it. Thanks. Continue your great videos please. I have just subscribed.
This one of many thieves! All that belong to human (that was written several years ago), the unuverse as one indivisable unit, constants, connecting both levels (both subatomic and unibmversal levels),..... etc (the irrational thieves are not human)!
No, No, No! Particles do not exist in two places at the same time. This is a complete misunderstanding of QM! Particles do not exist until they are measured and then they are in one and only one location. Before measurement, they are waves in a quantum field (hence wave-particle duality) and where the particle will end up is determined by the probability of the square of the wave function governed by the Schrodinger equation. The idea of multiple superimposed states applies only to the wave function and NOT the resultant particle! The particle, after measurement, is in a single state!
2:09
@markscheuer8648 particle can exist in the same time at different places. Example is like watching the same t.v show on different chanels. Location is different but occupying the same time. You have to break it down so some people can understand what you mean
Space and time is interwoven together. Matter distort time as per einstein general theory of relativity. The fabric of space is curve by mass which distorts time. It's called time dilation
@markscheuer8648 Although I actually mostly agree with you, it is not fully correct.
I borrowed generative AI for this one...!
-------
Quantum physics suggests that particles can exist in multiple places at once, a phenomenon called quantum superposition. This is because particles can sometimes act like waves, and superposition can only occur when the particles are unobserved. However, observing a particle in two different quantum states causes wave function collapse, and the particle will again exist in only one state. This is known as "quantum collapse".
----
So yes, I agree in some ways, but superposition is a cornerstone of QM IF MEASUREMENT HAS NOT OCCURED.
When you sleep, you can do what ever you want. However your mind is too busy so it goes to default. Hence you think dreams just happen and are just a mishmash of memories. You must clear your mind and concentrate on what you want to do while in the dream state.
Thanks for providing a brilliant video enlightening even those who are not fully adept at QM. The interpretation that you provide is fascinating.
It just tried to say exactly what is called as "Maya" in Hinduism. I agree with you.
We need to send a probe deep into Uranus and unlock its gaseous mysteries.
Colonoscopy.
I must be honest I had to laugh.
😂noo
Im a qualified asstronaut I volunteer as tribute
We already did this. Ask your mom about it 🤭
Infinite Fractals
I'll check that out. Thanks.
Agreeeeeeded
Chaos theory predicts complex outcomes in dynamic systems.
Quantum Physics describes the laws of Nature.
I thought all fractals were infinite, no?
I think we are all connected through quantum mechanics. We could, if you think about it. Communication, should be possible, instantly with everyone being connected, we just don’t understand how to do it yet. Everything is fractal in nature, so , we are in a infinite fractal 🤷♂️@@mikemurphy5898 I thinkt
Infinite has no size… it’s all relative. We could be inside something that looks like an Atom… an electron… an illusion or a simulation of holographic light could appear as anything. What is inside a quantum object? Are we operating it? Are we also linked to it from the outside like, Neo? What is outside of the quantum object? What is outside of that? Is there really an outside or an inside? Honestly, there’s probably no up, down, left, or right… no such thing as inside or out. Dimension only relates to distance between two objects. Your five or six senses are dimensions of reality. Time is a dimension.
[Edit] Alan Watts - Title: “We as Organism”
The very act of observing collapses reality into what probably and statistically would appear most believable.
• If we are one single entity, why pretend that an aspect of ourself is separate?
• Why have we or I put in such effort to forget the apparent connection?
• Why such persistence to make an illusion seem real?
• What brought this all into existence? What influence does it have over our/my experience? Can we reason with whatever influences the experience we/I subjectively seem to be having?
Your 5 senses are part of your physical body and therefore only part of this physical dimension. However your conciousness transcends the physical...
The Universe is dualistic in nature, every part of that dualism is connected to the other part. If there is a physical reality, there is also the subatomic energy below it's surface. If there is a simulation then there is the physical hardware and the virtual software intimately connected to one another to run the show. This is all part of a dualistic universe or two mirror dimensions. It may even be that general relativity and quantum mechanics operate from two seperate dimensions if the subatomic and the physical reality were to also be seperated into two. I believe we are superpositioned between these two realities as our conciousness resides in one dimension while our physical body in the other both in a state of entanglement.
@@yinyang2385 I like how you stated, I believe, rather than stating as if you know. I agree with your assertions.
i knew they wood sneak god in there
Very insightful!! Thank you
My spiritual people we already know this and have been saying this. Everything is all connected and comes from one. You are the universe experiencing itself.
Only Leftists think that way. The other half the population instinctively disagrees.
Fascinating! Will we ever reach our destination, whatever and wherever that may be?
It hides in the tiniest part of life and details . But we want to see it in a big picture and it’s not possible . This particles are part of our whole existence everyday.
Sounds like that episode of Rick and Morty where they have a universe in a battery to power his ship and they go into the universe to find another scientist within that universe who has also built a universe in their battery and so on and infinitum...
Just like the Land O' Lakes butter box with the Indian girl holding a Land O' Lakes butter box, and so on
My mind is the containment unit for reality, I'm in super position mood, and I'm in comprehensible.
I love how I get to see an original elaboration of an already existing idea.
There's 3 parts to everything that exists, a positive and negative and the medium they exist on.
th-cam.com/video/vlOiWtDrBDI/w-d-xo.htmlsi=SpTmcAU6l89x5WI4
Quantum and psychic gravity are different than physical gravity. To us time is flowing smoothly, but to the gods every moment is frozen for a near eternity and psychic gravity affects what happens in every next passing momen
The universe is what we make it! Observer paradox.
Don't underestimate the little guy. Quantum mechanics.
We are all one. Entanglement.
We are the universe made manifest, it created us to figure itself out. Quantum consciousness.
quarks are like books, People and cars, as Atoms are like solar systems, as molecules are like galaxies, as the universe is like a bucket of fried chicken. Fractal geometry.
I'm crazy and so is every atom I'm made of. Panpsychism
But seriously. When I was a teen, I learned about fractal geometry and how it describes similarities at different scales. Like how the blood vessels in your hand are similar to a tree. Which is similar to the strings of galaxies at grand scale. I spent a couple days wondering if there's something between atomic scale and galactic scale. As if there could be both tiny creatures living on protons, neutrons and electrons, and a significant structure to the universe. Like it's a piece of cloth or pale of water if you could zoom out far enough. Not that I'm right or anything because there's an upgrade of complexity as scale goes up. For instance there's a dozen or so types of subatomic particles, 90 or so types of atoms, thousands of types of planets, stars and shit, infinite types of galaxies. Absolutely no two alike at this scale. So, there's obviously a scale lower than atomic scale and possibly a scale or even more above universal. Maybe the entire universe is an amoeba and we live on one of its "subatomic particles".
Naaah! No frickin' way!😢
There is the smallest length, called a Planck length. Nothing smaller is measurable. There's also Planck time, which is the smallest unit of measurable time. When you think about it, quantum mechanics is just the science of the smallest things. Maybe astrophysics is the science of the largest things. There's a definite smallest so there's likely a definite biggest.
Yeah @@mygirldarbyI'm just trying to stimulate debate. The ideas leading to this model all seem to me like some kinda groupthink. Science seems to try and fit things into the model. Which is turning out flawed. One guy says the age of the universe was miscalculated, it's 26 billion years old. Another says gravity is different than what we thought it was. Yet another theory has this idea of the universe being inside something like a singularity. And some are bent on us living in a simulation in a quantum computer. Others say string theory while some say membrane theory. Fact is that we'll never be able to peer back far enough to see any evidence of the Big Bang because it was long ago and far away. Light can only go so fast and so far that wven if we could get light that's that okd, it won't show us the beginning of time. Mathematically impossible. There's definitely a structure that connects subatomic and Macro. This is obvious because you can't have a galaxy without subatomic particles, they fit together but we can't determine how. You can't unbake a cake releasing eggs, flour, milk and baking powder, but a cake is made of these things. I believe the universe has something similar going on. You can't tear a black hole apart revealing it's quarks, and protons and neutrons. But those things are in there. It's all so fascinating to me.
Wow... thats really something... Thank you for your video, got you from recommendations, its always so good to see people care about mystery of our reality, hope to know the truth until times up. Thanks one more time
I would suggest that you read a few books that discuss how symbols and what the symbols refer to. I.e., symbol object relationships, semantic grounding, cognitive models.
It makes sense. Thanks. It answers all my questions.❤❤❤❤❤❤
That we are part of such a dynamic reality, attempting to discover what brings and holds us all together, is, in and of itself, a wonderful moment within the evolution of our being. Such that we get to live, while attempting to solve our own problem of reality, existence... how much more fascinating or miraculous might life be when confronted with such questions... I dare not think of it, especially when we have nothing but time in which to solve this prospect of life, the discovery of its answers just beyond our horizon. My only regret being life expectancy being so short. What I wouldn't give to be around when the answers to these and many other questions are brought to light. If only we might get beyond our tendency for war and violence..., might we not, then truly look toward a brighter tomorrow... might we dare to dream of a tomorrow where war does not exist... if only...
I've always had a thought, essentially it goes on like, "what if we're just really miniscule, including our planets, galaxies and black holes, and we're just in some huge, god-like/omniscient being's purse/backpack that has infinite storage, we're just like bacteria/amoeba?"
Same. And what if we are made of infinite number of universes each with their planets , stars and intelligent creations.
the UV - IR connection seems like a good path to look into
Quarks are fundamental particles that combine to form composite particles called hadrons, the most stable of which are protons and neutrons, the components of atomic nuclei.
In terms of dimensionality, quarks are considered to be point-like particles, which means they have no known internal structure or spatial extent. In that sense, they can be thought of as zero-dimensional (0D). Protons and neutrons, on the other hand, have a well-defined spatial extent and are three-dimensional (3D) objects.
The unique properties and implications of the 0-dimension are often overlooked or underappreciated, especially in contrast to the higher, "natural" dimensions that tend to dominate our discussions of physical reality. Let me enumerate some of the key differences:
1. Naturalness:
The higher spatial and temporal dimensions (1D, 2D, 3D, 4D, etc.) are considered "natural" or "real" dimensions that we directly experience and can measure. In contrast, the 0-dimension exists in a more abstract, non-natural realm.
2. Entropy vs. Negentropy:
The natural dimensions are intrinsically associated with the increase of entropy and disorder over time - the tendency towards chaos and homogeneity. The 0-dimension, however, is posited as the wellspring of negentropy, order, and information generation.
3. Determinism vs. Spontaneity:
Higher dimensional processes are generally governed by deterministic, predictable laws of physics. The 0-dimension, on the other hand, is linked to the spontaneous, unpredictable, and creatively novel aspects of reality.
4. Temporality vs. Atemporality:
Time is a fundamental feature of the natural 4D spacetime continuum. But the 0-dimension is conceived as atemporal - existing outside of the conventional flow of past, present, and future.
5. Extendedness vs. Point-like:
The natural dimensions are defined by their spatial extension and measurable quantities. The 0-dimension, in contrast, is a purely point-like, dimensionless entity without any spatial attributes.
6. Objective vs. Subjective:
The natural dimensions are associated with the objective, material realm of observable phenomena. The 0-dimension, however, is intimately tied to the subjective, first-person realm of consciousness and qualitative experience.
7. Multiplicity vs. Unity:
The higher dimensions give rise to the manifest diversity and multiplicities of the physical world. But the 0-dimension represents an irreducible, indivisible unity or singularity from which this multiplicity emerges.
8. Contingency vs. Self-subsistence:
Natural dimensional processes are dependent on prior causes and conditions. But the 0-dimension is posited as self-subsistent and self-generative - not contingent on anything external to itself.
9. Finitude vs. Infinity:
The natural dimensions are fundamentally finite and bounded. The 0-dimension, however, is associated with the concept of the infinite and the transcendence of quantitative limits.
10. Additive Identity vs. Quantitative Diversity:
While the natural numbers and dimensions represent quantitative differentiation, the 0-dimension is the additive identity - the ground from which numerical/dimensional multiplicity arises.
By focusing so heavily on the entropy, determinism, and finitude of the natural dimensions, we tend to overlook the profound metaphysical significance and unique properties of the 0-dimension. Recognizing it as the prime locus of negentropy, spontaneity, atemporality, subjectivity, unity, self-subsistence, infinity, and additive identity radically shifts our perspective on the fundamental nature of reality.
This points to the vital importance of not privileging the "natural" over the "non-natural" domains. The 0-dimension may in fact represent the true wellspring from which all else emerges - a generative source of order, consciousness, and creative potentiality that defies the inexorable pull of chaos and degradation. Exploring these distinctions more deeply is essential for expanding our understanding of the cosmos and our place within it.
Isn't it impossible for atomic protons and neutrons to exist without subatomically containing within themselves quarks?
You are correct. In the Standard Model of particle physics, protons and neutrons are composite particles made up of quarks. Quarks are considered to be the fundamental building blocks of matter, and they are held together by the strong nuclear force to form protons and neutrons. Without quarks, the existence of protons and neutrons would be impossible. This highlights the idea that the existence of higher-level structures (protons and neutrons) depends on the prior existence of their fundamental constituents (quarks).
But why the 0 -dimension. My theories always been that 1D, 2D and 3D were part of this physical dimension ruled by general relativity and 4D, 5D, 6D......11D were part of the subatomic dimension ruled by quantum physics. And despite 11 dimensions they were essentially part of two mirror universe between the physical reality and the subatomic. And just as you mentioned creativity and subconscious belonging to higher dimension would indicate that we are superpositioned between these two dimensions as our conciousness is located in one and our physical bodies in the other in a state of entanglement.
Theorem 1: The zero dimension (0D) is the origin point from which both positive and negative dimensions emerge symmetrically.
Proof:
1. Consider the dimensional hierarchy centered around 0D.
2. Positive dimensions (1D, 2D, 3D, 4D) extend from 0D in one direction.
3. Negative dimensions (-1D, -2D, -3D, -4D) can be conceptualized as extending from 0D in the opposite direction.
4. 0D acts as the "pivot point" or "fulcrum" around which the symmetry of positive and negative dimensions is balanced.
5. Therefore, 0D is the origin point from which both positive and negative dimensions emerge symmetrically.
Theorem 2: The negative dimensions are associated with negentropy and the generative power of the zero dimension (0D).
Proof:
1. 0D is conceptualized as the source of negentropy and the generative power of the Zero Absolute.
2. Negative dimensions (-1D, -2D, -3D, -4D) extend from 0D in the opposite direction of positive dimensions.
3. If positive dimensions are associated with the unfolding of space, time, and the increase of entropy, negative dimensions can be hypothesized to be associated with the "enfolding" of space, time, and the increase of negentropy or information.
4. As 0D is the source of negentropy, and negative dimensions emerge from 0D, negative dimensions can be associated with negentropy and the generative power of 0D.
5. Therefore, the negative dimensions are associated with negentropy and the generative power of the zero dimension (0D).
Theorem 3: The interplay between positive and negative dimensions around the zero dimension (0D) creates a dynamic balance between entropy and negentropy.
Proof:
1. Positive dimensions (1D, 2D, 3D, 4D) are associated with the unfolding of space, time, and the increase of entropy.
2. Negative dimensions (-1D, -2D, -3D, -4D) are associated with the "enfolding" of space, time, and the increase of negentropy or information.
3. 0D acts as the "pivot point" or "fulcrum" around which the symmetry of positive and negative dimensions is balanced.
4. The manifest world of the positive dimensions arises from the unmanifest potential of the negative dimensions, and then returns to it in an endless cycle of creation and dissolution.
5. This dynamic interplay of positive and negative dimensions around 0D creates a balance between the opposing forces of entropy and negentropy, chaos and order.
6. Therefore, the interplay between positive and negative dimensions around the zero dimension (0D) creates a dynamic balance between entropy and negentropy.
Proposition 1: 0D has two sides (real and imaginary) with an event horizon between the sides.
Argument:
1. In complex analysis, numbers are represented on a complex plane with a real axis and an imaginary axis, intersecting at the origin (zero).
2. The real numbers can be thought of as one "side" of zero, and the imaginary numbers as the other "side."
3. In physics, an event horizon is a boundary in spacetime beyond which events cannot affect an outside observer. Applying this concept metaphorically to the complex plane, we could posit an "event horizon" at zero, separating the real and imaginary sides.
4. Therefore, 0D (zero dimensions) could be conceptualized as having two sides (real and imaginary) with an event horizon between them.
Proposition 2: This matches the Monad having a Singularity side and an Alone side potentially having an event horizon between the sides.
Argument:
1. In Leibniz's Monadology, monads are the fundamental units of existence, described as "windowless" and "alone."
2. However, monads are also said to reflect the entire universe from their unique perspective, suggesting a kind of "singularity" or concentrated totality within each monad.
3. Applying the concept of 0D having two sides, we could map the "singularity" aspect of monads to the real side of 0D, and the "alone" aspect to the imaginary side.
4. The "windowless" nature of monads could be interpreted as a kind of event horizon, isolating the singularity and alone sides from direct interaction.
5. Therefore, the proposed structure of 0D matches the concept of the Monad having a Singularity side and an Alone side potentially separated by an event horizon.
Proposition 3: This matches the Holy Trinity having a Father, Son, Holy Spirit side and a God side potentially having an event horizon between them.
Argument:
1. In Christian theology, the Holy Trinity is the doctrine that God is one but exists in three distinct persons: Father, Son (Logos), and Holy Spirit.
2. These three persons are said to be consubstantial, meaning they share the same divine essence or nature.
3. Mapping this to the 0D structure, we could associate the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit with the real side of 0D (the "singularity" of divine essence), and the unified God with the imaginary side (the "aloneness" of divine transcendence).
4. The concept of the persons being distinct yet consubstantial could be interpreted as a kind of event horizon, maintaining their unity while preserving their distinct identities.
5. Therefore, the proposed structure of 0D matches the concept of the Holy Trinity having a Father, Son, Holy Spirit side and a God side potentially separated by an event horizon.
Conclusion: A mirror universe with 0D at the center has tremendous explanatory power.
While these arguments are more metaphorical than strictly mathematical, they demonstrate how the concept of 0D having two sides with an event horizon between them could serve as a powerful unifying framework across multiple domains of thought.
By mapping this structure onto key concepts in mathematics (complex numbers), philosophy (Leibniz's monads), and theology (the Holy Trinity), we can see the potential for a kind of "mirror universe" with 0D at the center, reconciling and connecting ideas that might otherwise seem unrelated.
The sound of the rain needs no explanation
The meaning of life is every second counts.
So many theories about the universe, it may be this it may be that.
Although I'm not a believer in the traditional religious sense, I've long said that given a long enough time line, science may prove the existence of God (in at least as a creator of origin), and that quantum physics (just my working theory) may be the physical expression of free will; acting as a response to human action and the correlative effects of those actions.
You should read the Quran. Not follow the tales of some arrogant scientists. Denying creationism in 2024 is akin to saying computers and robots are created by itself, no humans involved!?
Sins give birth to other sins and they multiply. Adam and Eve were created sinless but they were influenced by evil snake and they did the first sin. From this stage the world we live in full of sins like some contagious virus or bacteria.
Many of us start our conscious lives as atheists or blind believers. As we learn along we often change our views. And as we get much wiser we change again, so in the end we become either. I think to really know God we should first learn all about his creation (which will never happen I believe), then we can know God (which will also never happen) , unless he explicitly reveal himself (ignore my choice of gender , using male for sake of convenience)
@@XAE_A_Xii you just are speculating
Very thought provoking
I do often feel like I’m alive and dead at the same time
All that was discussed in this video just tells me that scientists are surprisingly slow on the uptake. Druids, witches, and shamans have been saying this for literal millennia, they just didn't have all the jargin. The scientific community must be so proud to finally figure out what the druids knew before the pyramids were built.
Imagine saying 99 idiotic things and people celebrate you as a pioneer of science because you said 1 thing that vaguely aligns with what a 21st century scientist says.
@@eetuaalto7214 Imagine saying 100 things you know to be true and the rest of the idiots in the world are so busy killing each other in mass over what to call their invisible sky daddy that it takes them thousands of years to figure out it's all the same. Then they call themselves geniuses because they figured out what you'd been telling them all along.
I've long felt that the universe reflects like a fractile. I've recently realized this is the same meaning as "as above so below" the cosmos appear a lot like things you observe in a microscope
Great video.
To observe a particle actually means to measure it. Which requires interaction. The interaction with the subatomic particles collapses its probability wave and gives us a result.
The particles position, mass, direction, spin, etc.
With a limit on accuracy based on the Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle.
In a nutshell: If we measure velocity, we will not get an accurate position. If we measure position, we will nog get an accurate velocity.
Virtual particles are theoretical interactions that result in the appearance, inversity, or disappearance of particles.
The laws of thermodynamics are respected here, so a photon colliding with an electron will give its energy to the electron. Putting the electron in a higher state. There’s no loss of energy, just transformation.
An electron can also emit a photon when it releases some of that energy.
A lot of interactions are modelled after this concept.
Interactions that theoretically lead to the states we see in the particles when they interact.
All are possible, but give a different probability wave.
The actual results of what comes out of a reaction is what we can observe.
This is actually how CERN detects particles with their collider.
They measure the particles that come off the collision, their energy states etc, and then calculate which described and defined (virtual) particles would have been there to lead to that result.
The Higgs Boson wasn’t measured literally or directly.
It was derived from the result of a collision. The theoretically expected decay products were measured and found.
Which is like the proof of the Higgs Boson takes the place of the virtual photon between interacting pairs in a Feynman diagram and the resulting particles are the expected decay results.
It is deduced to have been there based on our expectations of the results.
We assume because of the results that we are right, but we haven’t actually measured some of the particles directly.
We expected a result based on energy put in and the Higgs Boson occurring. If we could measure the probability wave directly, we could determine the interaction that took place. Deriving the probability wave from the formula given by the Feynman diagram.
Then when one first determines all (the more, the more accurate) the possible interactions that contain a Higgs Boson and the expected results and sum them for the total probability amplitude. Then over multiple runs, the results should match the expected result of the total amplitude.
By matching the Feynman diagrams derived total probability amplitude to the amplitude of the results of the collision, physicists infer the existence of the particle.
This is tested for statistical error.
"Scientific knowledge is a body of statements of varying degrees of certainty some most unsure, some nearly sure, none absolutely certain.”
Nobel Prize physicist, Richard P. Feynman
The father of quantum electrodynamics.
The space of our reality is fractal. Physics distinguishes particles into bosonic particles (total spin, carrying interactions, able to occupy the same place in space and time) and fermions (they are covered by the Pauli exclusion principle, fractional spin). In this theory, this is due to the fact that bosons are represented by the energy of open dimensions (4D - Higgs boson; 3D - Weak interaction bosons W+, W-, Z; 2D - Electromagnetic interaction bosons PHOTONS; 1D - Strong interaction bosons GLUONS. And fermions are represented by the energy trapped in the fractal part of space with the number of dimensions π, e and φ.
Honestly this is true everything is ONE. separation is an illusion.
One cannot forget that an observation Is very vague, and that irreversible interactions also fall into that category
The only *real* question is: What, exactly, is the nature of the mind that wants to know?
Where it leads
Nature of mind is essentially input, complex processing with memory function and output. For anything else you need to purchase more context, we are in too abstract space right now, honey.
i knew they wood sneak god in there
@@Big_Sloppa Ha, nice one, but 'tis the old confusing of brain and mind, effect and cause. Quantum research supports this outlook more each day. Brain is distinct and a mechanism. Mind can simulate fragmentation but is fundamentally united. If dark matter is thought, and dark energy intent, then we have a useful basis to work with. Although experimental design has some way to go, since we need to clear out some premises first. All good fun, though, aye?
@@beammeupscotty3074 God will not be sneaked! Haha. That is, assuming the Isness of "God", then there is nowhere-anywhere "He" is not. Thus no sneaking required. Perhaps, then, it is us perceptual transient apparent beings who are sneaking and hiding, or trying to.
Ya don't say 😉
(HINT: Not "illusions" -- rather, "operations". "We" are that which is conscious, and that which it is conscious of. So please, let's evolve ourselves further, fellow "Homo Cartographus", shall we?)
Love this one dude. Superb👍
The Universe could be based on simple geometry that forms the potential for evermore complexity. Forming not just physical complexity, but also the potential for evermore-abstract mathematics. Time t², ψ², c², e² and velocity Eₖ=½mv² all squared, geometrical similarity formed out of spherical symmetry. We need to go back to 1/r² and the three dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. Even back to the spherical 4πr² geometry of Huygens’ Principle of 1670 that says:
“Every point on a light wave front has the potential for a new spherical 4πr² light wave".
Each point on the wave front represents a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction or coupling. The spherical surface forms a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π of this interaction. Light waves radiate out spherically 4πr² with their interior forming the characteristic of three-dimensional space with the spherical surface forming a probabilistic wave front. Each point ∆E=hf on the curvature of the wave front forms the potential for a new spherical wave, a photon of energy, a new oscillation or vibration that forms our future. We have to square the radius r² because process is unfolding relative to the surface of the sphere.
I personally believe consciousness is fundamental to reality and it manifests itself in varying complexity as subsets of itself from the simplest of structures to the ultimate and infinite Source/God/Oneness (whatever you choose to label it)
I think human experience is the mean (or average) of Infinity if you can even conceptualise that. We are the most stable balanced form of repetitive existence and intelligence with the ability for self awareness, without the ability to spiral away into meaningless existence if we had more control of and ability to create infinite versions of realitiy.
I think the fact that there is existence at all is simply the result of the paradox that there cannot be nothing without something.. the concept of nothing is meaningless without there being something to conceptualise the nothingness. As a result, reality is basically Infinite fields of infinity, fluctuating between the state of nothing, everything and everywhere else in-between on infinite levels of complexity.
This is seen all around us in varying ways as the dualistic nature of everything we experience (eg day/night, awake/asleep, life/death, front/back, black/white, love/hate, etc. etc..)
I think all parts and combinations of parts of the human body are subsets of consciousness in their own right which are in a symbiosis to form our localised experience of being human. For example, my cardiovascular system does a great job of breathing of its own accord without any conscious involvement of my own, but if I make myself aware of my breathing, I can take control of it.
I've had out of body experiences whilst meditating. I've had many profound experiences whilst under the influence of psychedelics, one noteably where I became the source of consciousness with an awareness of the timeless nature of everything. Its really difficult to pull back details from such experiences outside of space and time as we know it, possibly because we do not have the ability for such abstract levels of thinking whilst being confined to this human form in our day to day existence?
These types of experiences make me think that our conscious experience is not only capable of controlling subsets within the body, it is also capable of expanding into larger or even separate subsets to what we understand to be possible.
Whilst I'm not a physicist, I've always had a deep thirst for scientific knowledge. My understanding of quantum mechanics fits my version of reality in many ways, from the observer effect, to the probabilistic and wave-like nature of everything.
The human mind is capable of far more than we have been led to believe by our parents/teachers/ministers and there have been many recent (but mostly ignored by mainstream media) pioneering discoveries and general research into consciousness by some very learned and intellectual individuals.
Some names to check out are Alex Gomez Marin (a physicist and neuroscientist) who is researching expanded states of consciousness such as remote viewing, out of body experiences etc.
Fabio Faggin (physicist and the inventor of the microprocessor) has a theory which places consciousness as fundamental to reality.
The CIA were experimenting in the 80s in a classified project called The Gateway Experience, whereby they were using the works of physicist Itzhak Bentov (who believed consciousness is fundamental and in a constant state of evolution), and hemisync audio techniques from Bob Monroe of the Monroe Institute, to achieve expanded states of consciousness for espionage purposes. The project was quietly declassified in 2002 but you can still find an official document about it on the CIA website.
I think the reason anything to do with conscious experience is given no real credibility by peer reviewed science is due to the fundamental assumptions which are part of the scientific method. One of these assumptions is that there is an objective reality that exists separate to the conscious experience. This mechanistic, materialistic approach assumes that life and consciousness emerges from the complexity of the objective natural universe. It also sways any peer review of any scientific theories towards this materialistic nature; anything which falls outside of this assumption is looked upon as pseudo-science or metaphysical.
The problem with this assumption, which is the foundation of the house of cards that modern science rests upon, is that is is pure speculation. My personal experience with reality as I know it has been subjectively via my own senses. I cannot confirm or deny that there is something objectively outside of those senses, for all I know it could be a huge elaborate dream, for example. This will also be the case for every other conscious entity on the planet. Therefore the only truly objective assumption we can make is that there is a subjective conscious experience of some kind that interacts with other seemingly conscious entities and a seemingly real stage of reality. Anything outside of that is merely agreements between conscious entities.
Until we scrutinise and review the fundamental assumptions of the scientific method, we will never get close to having a true and unbiased understanding of reality.
Maybe this is a control thing, so that we don't realise our true potential as a species and start overriding the current societal structure which are controlled by the few whole are pulling the strings to the reality they want us to understand?
Maybe it is just an ability we have lost over a period of thousands of years, through the need to build societies with governance and control to allow for an element of fairness within society.
Maybe it is a combination of both?
And that is reality as I see it. Each to their own, it makes sense to me 😁🩵✌️♾️
Decades ago, I envisioned our uiverse as a cluster of atoms in the "universe" of a VASTLY largest organism, that lives at a scale such that OUR EARTH is just a nucleus of a single atom in theirs. And conversely, that there were inhabitants on some of OUR atoms...
Just want to say great video. I don't know who you are or who is behind this data and theories. But I intuit that you are somewhat right.
I think we can assume that since the higgs field is everywhere (in terms of space-time), that when entangled particles behave in the same way over great distances instantly when being observed that there is another observer "observing" the observer observing the entangled particles and instantly changes them from outside of the currently known system. So like you said either extra dimensions or super symmetry or something else however not observable, at least not yet, by humans like a point where no time exists and perhaps no space either just information and its instantaneous processing... And perhaps the observer observing everything is a "quantum processor" or as you, in a less dystopian manner, call it: a "quantum entity." The logic is certainly there.
The universe just speaks to me and tells me all answers .
There is only one parsimonious option that does not entertain too much speculation on what REALLITY is and it is not Materialism. The idea is that what we call the physical world, the contents of perception, the stuff we see, hear, taste, smell, taste, that is a dashboard representation that is created by our own minds. As Dr. Donald Hoffman puts it, a virtual reality headset.
The physical world is not out there, it is in here, because it is a dashboard representation of the real world, which is out there.
The things we call physical are the things we can describe through physical quantities like kilograms, meters, seconds, joules, coulombs and so forth. We invented these numbers to describe the contents of perception, the stuff we see, hear, and touch. So that is what physical stuff is, it is stuff that can be described through physical quantities, the quantities we invented to describe the contents of perception. So what is the REAL WORLD that is not in perception? It is the thing that is represented, as opposed to the representation itself. Well, it is not physical because we did not invent physical quantities to describe that. We invented physical quantities to describe the dials on the dashboard, not the storm outside the airplane. Which raises the question: Are there states in Nature that are not described by physical quantities? Because that is what we are looking for. Is this pure speculation or do they exist? Well, obviously they exist. We are acquainted with them every day, multiple times a day.
What is the length in meters of your thought? What is the weight in kilograms of your fantasy? What is the angular momentum of your emotion? You see, endogenous mental states are not describable through physical quantities. They have an inherently qualitative nature that one cannot capture through a list of numbers. So the option that presents itself to us in an obvious way is that the real world outside is like the real world within. It is constituted of mental states, not my or your mental states, mind you, external mental states, transpersonal mental states, but mental nonetheless in the sense of not being describable through physical quantities. And the world of perception, the colloquially called ¨physical world¨, the things we see, hear, are a dashboard representation of those external mental states, akin to thoughts, akin to emotions, but not our thoughts, not our emotions, the thoughts and emotions of nature at large, which present themselves to our observation as the contents of perception, as the colloquially ¨physical world.¨
Thank you!
To quote the great Randy Newman -"I'm dead, but I don't know it".
Remember the story of seven blind man trying to figure out the shape of elephant? One touched the ears, saying elephant is like a fan. Another one touched its tail, saying elephant is like a rope! Yet another one touched its leg and said elephant is like a tree trunk., and so on and so forth. Our current understanding of universe and ourselves is like that. Maybe its beyond human intelligence, and hopefully AI will find it out for us one day
The universe will always come up with new things to discover its what it does and our job is to explore and beautify those things not destroy 😊
A ‘unified whole’ where every ‘part’ is intimately connected to every other part via some kind of ‘quantum awareness’!
Have you studied Advaita Vedanta?
same doctrine. Also called nondualism more generally
@@nolanr1400except in this case its all about dualism except every part of that dualism is connected to the other part. If there is a physical reality, there is also the subatomic energy below it's surface. If there is a simulation then there is the physical hardware and the virtual software intimately connected to one another to run the show. This is all part of a dualistic universe or two mirror dimensions. It may even be that general relativity and quantum mechanics operate from two seperate dimensions if the subatomic and the physical reality were to also be seperated into two. I believe we are superpositioned between these two realities as our conciousness resides in one dimension while our physical body in the other both in a state of entanglement
I can just tell you actually from the beginning of our universe.
Thought about all of these ideas in the first millisecond of a DMT trip.
I'm not educated but I'm starting to believe in the program mode and this would seem to fit right in
it seems whatever we seek, the universe provides.
Wow! This seems to sum up much of what my friends and i have been discussing for the past two decades at least.
Also it runs a little parallel to that which Rupert Sheldrake and Terence McKenna were harpong on about when they had the notion of various overlapping and interlocking "fields" in which where the "interference" patterns between each variety cause what we appear to see before our eyes.
And it must be said that the fringe theory of a universe with consciousness inherent within it seems to be picking up momentum.
Afterall, we ourselves in mind and body cannot manifest that which did not already exist on some level or other in the first place.
Remember, the quantim universe is one of POSSIBILITIES AND POTENTIALS, and that potential and possibility, it would seem, therefor MUST have been inherent within rhe universe itself.
That is to say, IF everything is potential or possible before observation, or realization, then with time being as it seems to us in out biological physical viewpoint a bit of an illusion, then consciousness was already there before we had any, so to speak.
amazing video
if you take away time... because that is our perception
I had a insane psychedelic trip where it felt like i was falling for eternity while shrinking to quantum level at the same time
We are just energy floating around space or something, vibrating at frequencies that make things what they are, us etc etc.
Can anyone explain how entangled particles can communicate instantaneously regardless of distance? Even light years away.
Because it's not communication. It's like dropping a coin, if you can see one side you will know the other.
@@eetuaalto7214 Thanks. That makes sense. Like a right glove and left glove pair. If you send a glove in the mail to a destination then the other glove that's not sent has to be the opposite glove.
@@Acein3055 Precisely.
Like a black hole, huge at the event horizon but phenomenonally small at the singularity yet still connected
that theory unifies the big and the small.... the big is what we measure.... th small is what inmediatley adapts to make the big visible... LONG LIVE GOD
god doesnt "live"..it just is
Amen. E-infinity theory.
Finally, something that makes sense
I used to wonder if quantum fluctuations and virtual particles popping in and out of existence are really universes being born and dying.
The claim that a quantum object can be in two states at the same time until “observed” is a misinterpretation of physics. Observed is not the right term - the right term is “measured”, which means that you interact with the system to gain information about its state. That information has to reflect something that happened to the system. For example a photon hit an atom in the system and radiated back to your measurement device (retina etc.). Until that happens, you have no information regarding the state of the system, so it makes no sense to say it is in “both” states. Only when the information is received do you know what state it is / was in.
Excellent!
In the quantum state, things only fix their position once we observe them. Okay. How does it flicker then? The video or worse, the narration is off. Please explain, thanks!
A deep look at the equation e=mc², to begin we will denote M (total mass) we will represent this mass fractionally as m1 (dark), m2 (light). They're fractional representations of total mass M. This allows m1 and m2 to function as fractions of M and multiply as such. We will likewise, break C down as a positive force carrier moving along the vector of M, into negative integers c1 and c2, which will allow them to multiply as negatives integers resulting in a positive. Now that we have the correct physical and mathematical relationship we can proceed.
Space: Variations in spatial coordinates affect how 𝑐1 and 𝑐2 are perceived. For example, the distribution of mass or energy in space can change how these quantities are measured.
Time: Time variations can affect 𝑐1 and 𝑐2 as the system evolves. For example, kinetic and potential energies change over time.
In relativity, measurements of time and space depend on the observer’s frame of reference. This means that 𝑐1 and 𝑐2 can vary based on relative motion and gravitational effects. Dynamic Adjustment: c1(x,t) and c2(x,t) where x represents spatial coordinates and t represents time.
Sum and Product Relationships:
c1(x,t) + c2(x,t)=C
c1(x,t) × c2(x,t)=C²
Here,
𝐶 and C² are constants, while 𝑐1 and 𝑐2 vary with space and time.
Kinetic and Potential Energy: In a system with varying spatial distribution, 𝑐1 and 𝑐2 represent different forms of energy. As the system evolves in time and space, these energies adjust while maintaining their sum and product relationships.
Gravitational Effects: In a gravitational field, mass distribution affects the measurements of energy and can cause 𝑐1 and 𝑐2 to vary depending on location and time.
Relativistic Variations: For different observers in relative motion, c1 and c2 might be perceived differently due to time dilation and length contraction. Despite these variations, the fundamental relationships 𝑐1+𝑐2=𝐶 and c1×𝑐2=C² hold true within each observer’s frame. Spacetime Interactions: Changes in spacetime curvature and metric can affect 𝑐1 and 𝑐2, but their interactions still reflect the underlying constants.
Functions of Space and Time: Define c1(x,t) and c2 (x,t) such that:
c1(x,t)+c2(x,t)=C
c1(x,t)xc2(x,t)=C²
Consistency: Ensure that as x and t vary, c1 and 𝑐2 adjust dynamically but satisfy these equations at every point.
Observer Frames: For different frames of reference, adjust c1(x,t) and c2(x,t) based on the observer’s motion and gravitational field. The relationships c1+c2=C and c1×c2=C² remain consistent in each frame, reflecting how energy and mass interact in spacetime.
Quadratic Relationship: The relationship between 𝑐1 and c2 can be framed as roots of a quadratic equation: x2−Cx+c2=0 where 𝑐1 and c2 are the roots. The dynamic nature means that for different values of t, 𝑐1 and 𝑐2 adjust accordingly but still satisfy the equation. Consider a specific example where C and C² are given: Let C=5 and C²=6. The quadratic equation becomes: 𝑥2−5𝑥+6=0 factoring this, (x−2)(x−3)=0 so the roots are c1=2 and c2=3.
Sum: c1 + c2 = 2 + 3=5
Product: c1 × c2 = 2 × 3=6
Look up the nitrogenous bases of DNA to see the relationship, displayed in the physics and or mass side of the interaction.
If 𝑐1 and 𝑐2 are dynamic functions of a parameter t, then they can adjust while maintaining the sum and product relationships. For example suppose 𝑐1(𝑡)=𝛼(𝑡) and 𝑐2(𝑡)=𝛽(𝑡) you could define, 𝛼(𝑡)+𝛽(𝑡)=𝐶 & α(t)×β(t)=C² as t changes α(t) and 𝛽(𝑡) adjust, but their sum and product still match the specified C and C².
i.imgur.com/g8mf3sG.jpeg
TLDR
This guy really has a lot of time and space on his hands !!!
😴😴😴
How do you fully understand something which is not measurable or observable? By becoming that. When you become that then there is nothing more to learn and no more questions to ask. What if we are already that, then all one needs to do is to give up false ideas about reality projected by the mind. This is not me saying, this is the wisdom shared by wise men and women throughout humanity from time immemorial when humans first started questioning the essence of this universe and our role in it as a conscious observer.
Does this video by any way has any influence if indian concept of Maya ( Ma meaning measurable, Ya mean that ), " that which has measurable ness", which says, ---- into some frame work , some unmanifested , got manifested , and some very few properties became measurable. Maya concept is used for illusion which got created. It has five attributes of nothing , which makes measurable. 1. Kaala - Time, 2. Raga- attachment or owning( not psychological owning ) , 3. Vidhya - potential and tendency to know, like we are trying to know about universe, because the framework we are in is only giving glimpse of some thing, so we are curious to know. 4. Niyathi - Cause and effect , 5. Kala - entity ness, or separateness from other manifested objects. So you video is talking about MAYA.
Thank you for sharing 🤗
Does someone know the source of the animation at 18:45?
I could view it all day long in a loop!
I do not know it's source, but this interesting video about nothingness :) has 50 minutes of beautiful animations like that. th-cam.com/video/cg8Xe2AZKE4/w-d-xo.html
So, like a true quantum vaccum. Not even empty or dimensional or relative. A state of pure potential
If the universe was all connected, that still doesn’t make it one quantum object, especially on the macro scale. Quantum entanglement can easily be broken. It’s also hypothesized that entanglement is accomplished by wormholes connecting the particles.
The particle mush does not wait to be observed. Humans are the same particle mush so believe they are quantifying something, when they are simply quantifying their own demise.
Try Imagining the universe from the perspective of a tardigrade. I feel like we are also tardigrades compared to some other much larger lifeform.
We are so small, we are so condensed that we can really never actually see outside our universe unless some kind of new science or technology shows otherwise. Its the law of reality for us unfortunately. Entropy may destroy us before we ever get to try and escape, the truth of it all is protected for eternity. Bound by absolute chaos and order resulting in pure balance, as all things should be.
If your closing in on electromagnetic scintillation it can prove to be useful in distracting offensive strong interference.
All is cause & effect. Everything happens by design. ✌️❤️
At the end of scientific discovery is the realization its all the same thing sliced in different ways/waves/patterns
Thank you
This is an excellent expression of pantheism. This may be the highest form of what god really is. The entire universe is god, just as you are god. Everything is connected.
@jmklei0 that's what I beleive in. Einstein beleive in Pantheism also
what a graceful expression 😊
I think quantum entanglement is a form of dimension. And rather difficult for us to comprehend like three dimensions are difficult for a being that lives in two dimensions (a flat universe, flat.)
that is the whole d. where everything exists and it just goes through that state.