One Hour of Mind-Blowing Scientific Theories on Conscious Universe

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 พ.ค. 2024
  • In this video, we're going to take a deep dive into some fascinating topics like Panpsychism, Integrated Information Theory, the Living Universe Hypothesis, the Gaia Hypothesis, the Anthropic Principle, Cosmic Evolution, the Fine-Tuning Argument, and Cosmic Natural Selection. Let's unpack these together!
    Overview:
    Schrödinger's Unified Consciousness: Bridging Physics and Philosophy
    Erwin Schrödinger, a pioneering quantum physicist, delved deep into the interplay between Eastern philosophy and Western science, proposing a radical idea: the existence of a singular, universal consciousness. Drawing from Indian philosophical concepts, he challenged traditional metaphysical assumptions, suggesting that individual minds are mere facets of a greater cosmic entity. This perspective, merging science and spirituality, offers a unique lens to understand the essence of consciousness and its place in the universe.
    The Conscious Cosmos: Universe as a Thinking Entity?
    The concept of a conscious universe, known as panpsychism, suggests that the cosmos might possess its own form of self-awareness. Drawing parallels between the intricate networks of neurons in the human brain and the vast interconnected galaxies, some theorists speculate on the universe's potential for consciousness. However, the consistent behavior of universal laws and the lack of empirical evidence challenge this notion, leaving it as a captivating, yet unresolved, mystery.
    The Universe's Neural Network: A Cosmic Consciousness?
    The universe's vast structure resembles our brain's neural networks, sparking debates about a conscious cosmos. However, non-local connections and current scientific understanding make this a speculative topic.
    Consciousness and the Universe: A Quantum Perspective
    Quantum mechanics raises questions about consciousness's role in shaping reality. While some argue for its centrality, others believe inherent universal properties, not observation, determine particle states.
    Testing the Conscious Universe: Panpsychism Meets Integrated Information Theory
    Panpsychism sees consciousness everywhere. Integrated information theory, with its Φ value, offers a method to test this, potentially linking philosophy and science.
    The Universe as a Living Entity: Exploring Cosmic Evolution
    The living universe hypothesis views the cosmos as a living being, undergoing evolutionary processes. This idea, though speculative, provides a framework for cosmic understanding.
    Earth as a Living Entity: The Gaia Hypothesis Explored
    James Lovelock's Gaia hypothesis portrays Earth as a self-regulating organism. This perspective emphasizes Earth's interconnected ecosystem and humanity's role within it.
    The Universe's Fine-Tuning: A Dance with Life and Existence
    The universe's balance suggests it might be fine-tuned for life, a concept known as the anthropic principle. Yet, the potential for diverse life forms or other universes adds layers of complexity to this idea.
    The Universe's Glimpse of Consciousness
    Evolution implies that as we comprehend the universe, it becomes self-aware.
    Briefly:
    In the intricate dance of Quantum Mechanics, Schrödinger's explorations into Consciousness hinted at a Universal Consciousness, a concept further supported by Panpsychism and the Integrated Information Theory. The Gaia Hypothesis, combined with the Anthropic Principle, suggests a Fine-Tuning of cosmic parameters, leading to theories of Cosmic Evolution and the Living Universe Hypothesis, both of which echo the interconnected patterns seen in Neural Networks. The mysteries of Non-local Connections and Particle Behavior challenge our Metaphysical Assumptions, while Quantum Observation and Multiverse Theory offer glimpses into the vast expanse of Cosmic Consciousness. Bridging Eastern Philosophy and Western Science, the concept of Cosmic Adaptation and Quantum Reality delves into the universe's Cosmic Metabolism and its inherent Cosmic Self-Awareness. As we grapple with Universal Laws, the ideas of Cosmic Natural Selection, backed by Empirical Evidence, shed light on the enigma of Particle Duality and the universe's delicate Cosmic Equilibrium.
    Chapters
    00:00 Introduction
    00:38 Why Did Schrödinger Believe That There Was Only One Mind In The Universe?
    10:59 Is The Universe Just A Giant Brain? (Panpsychism)
    18:55 Is Every Galaxy A Neuron In A Vast Universal Brain? (Are We Living In Someone's Brain?)
    27:11 Did Consciousness Become The Universe And Create Itself? (Double-Slit Experiment, Consciousness and Quantum Mechanics)
    37:28 Can It Be Tested Whether The Universe Is Conscious? (Integrated Information Theory)
    45:32 Is The Universe A Living Organism? (The Living Universe Hypothesis)
    53:51 Is Earth Alive? (The Gaia Hypothesis)
    1:00:16 Is The Universe Fine-Tuned For Life And Mind? (The Fine-Tuning Argument)
    1:05:34 Are We The Universe Becoming Aware Of Itself? (Is Consciousness Ultimate Reality?)
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 2.7K

  • @ricf9592
    @ricf9592 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +950

    The idea that we exist at all, let alone able to consider that existence is beyond astonishing.

    • @jaylucas8352
      @jaylucas8352 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

      Because we don’t really exist we just think we do

    • @rexracer7192
      @rexracer7192 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +58

      ​@@jaylucas8352There are some that feel that life is a single consciousness experiencing every conceivable experience possible. We are all the same consciousness...

    • @robdev89
      @robdev89 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Pretty normal if you ask me. 😅😂

    • @bwilderd5082
      @bwilderd5082 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@jaylucas8352Maybe we just think we don’t really exist. Or maybe we just think we are thinking that we think. Ya think?

    • @user-fj9ez7kv8p
      @user-fj9ez7kv8p 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      We are the universe experiencing itself to understand what it really is😊

  • @skepsisology
    @skepsisology 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    For consciousness to emerge from the system at large means the system itself is alive. We are not separate from the universe

    • @RemainedAnonymous
      @RemainedAnonymous 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Good point

    • @hide_and_go_sikh
      @hide_and_go_sikh 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      We are gut bacterial trying to understand wĥeat comodities

    • @hide_and_go_sikh
      @hide_and_go_sikh 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      When radio arrives reach a black hole or some information destroyed?

    • @rachealfaucher4520
      @rachealfaucher4520 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      imagine we’re just a speck of water or grain of sand in someone else’s universe. what what we are to ants.

    • @skepsisology
      @skepsisology 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@hide_and_go_sikh not destroyed but made prisoner. Locked away under the strictest rule of infinity. That infinity describes the impossibility of escape. You can't move faster than the speed of the information that describes you. Your space is now time on the none dimensional sphere and time is now a physical object that occupies an infinitesimal point in space. A type of reality that has no meaning in the macro world, similarly how our world has no meanings to high energy particles
      If no information can be destroyed what is the experience of a black hole - so impossible to imagine

  • @kellymason7977
    @kellymason7977 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    My friend and I both admitted to randomly thinking about a high school teacher of ours the day before his passing.
    I 100% believe that we are all a collection of energy.

    • @RoshanAntonyTauro
      @RoshanAntonyTauro หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's weird.

    • @noahlapuz3853
      @noahlapuz3853 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Interesting. I've met the father of a close acquaintance and thought about him. He was easy going and smiles all the time. I asked our common friend if she remembers him, just because I admired him for his light-hearted demeanor, he was vibin' all the time. To my surprise she just found out from our friend he died in a coma. Similar to your friend, I never ever mentioned him via phone, she cut me off before I was about to ask her if she remember the father of our friend. I felt him smile at me as if to tease me that he's still vibin' on another dimension.

  • @alexciocca4451
    @alexciocca4451 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +64

    When I was 8 years old , 68 years ago I had this problem. I was thinking what if I was not me ? What if I was created through someone else’s dream ? Took me a while to get it worked out 68 years ago .

    • @bethanygee6939
      @bethanygee6939 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Thanks for sharing that. 😃

    • @LilXancheX
      @LilXancheX 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You are OLD!

    • @imagitu6409
      @imagitu6409 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@LilXancheX wow, what wise words

    • @marknavarro953
      @marknavarro953 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I used to think everybody was just me but in a different body.

    • @asiffayaz5279
      @asiffayaz5279 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ٱلَّذِيٓ أَحۡسَنَ كُلَّ شَيۡءٍ خَلَقَهُۥۖ وَبَدَأَ خَلۡقَ ٱلۡإِنسَٰنِ مِن طِينٖ } As-Sajdah:7
      Who perfected everything which He created and began the creation of man from clay.

  • @MarkBuckawicki
    @MarkBuckawicki 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +651

    Principle one: the universe is mental

    • @2ndhandjoke
      @2ndhandjoke 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

      2: Correspondence, as above so below
      3: cause & effect
      4: vibration
      5: Rhythm
      6: polarity
      7: Gender

    • @TotalDec
      @TotalDec 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@@2ndhandjoke
      3) Causality

    • @zanussi303
      @zanussi303 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      The universe is a harmonic,fractal hologram of mind I.e. an ever changing field of consciousness . Which is what time is. The gnostic black iron prison, that we , the light must transcend.

    • @davidapatrickmoore
      @davidapatrickmoore 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Correct.

    • @davidapatrickmoore
      @davidapatrickmoore 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ​@zanussi303 Maybe not ever- changing, but appearing so from simple levels of Consciousness. Good job.
      The Consciousness of Humanity will keep this this planet (Gaia), rising and you are a contributor to that rise.
      Thank you

  • @charliechalk2554
    @charliechalk2554 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +83

    It’s crazy how people wake up every morning an just get on with life, never being struck by the Absurd nature of existence. Never dizzy from the spin of our planet or terrified by the constant imminent total destruction from sun flares. We live an the thinnest of surface layers of consciousness. I think without our inherent ignorance, nothing would get done, we’d just be rolling about on the floor. Crying then laughing. Screaming in fear and exctsy

    • @TJ28628
      @TJ28628 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Not me, I've suffered with waves of crippling anxiety throughout my life as a result of the excessive amounts of time/energy I've experienced reflecting on the nature of this reality. As long as I am aware, I am completely blown away by the nature of our existence, a nature which I may never fully understand and but I've certainly achieved a greater understanding of the objective nature of this reality in comparison to the understanding that over 99.9999 percent of all known forms of awareness that have emerged from the manifestations of energy and matter on earths surface and constructed the original micro patterns/code for the behavior/awareness of the single cell life forms that continued to mutate and spread itself to create the experience that we reflect upon at this perceived point in space/time. There are trillions of cells which have manifested into the body of matter and energy that causes us to experience all. Objectively speak, The behavior of humans is trillions of times more complex than the behavior of the single cell(s) that first emerged. To better understand the objective nature of our reality, we must create a form of artificial intelligence that has enough processing power/potential to detect, measure and correlate the intricate connection of the trillions of cells within the brain/body and how consious interpretations of sensory information as well as behavior patterns correlates with the web of connections and the responses to force from the most micro to macro patterns that are known to dictate the nature of human experience.

    • @JavierVazquez-su1bi
      @JavierVazquez-su1bi 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@TJ28628
      Wow 👌
      Tell me what you think of Aliens 👽

    • @charliechalk2554
      @charliechalk2554 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Aliens do/have/will exist. That’s a statistical fact, where as do they exist at the same time as us is a lot less likely, even less likely that they would inhabit a galaxy near us and be of sufficient evolutionary advancements in Oder to contact us let alone visit us is extremely unlikely @@JavierVazquez-su1bi

    • @TJ28628
      @TJ28628 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JavierVazquez-su1bi The aliens are really interdimensional beings.

    • @raydavison4288
      @raydavison4288 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I have spent a great deal of time staring into the abyss, and I have found that it really isn't something to practice on a constant basis. 😊

  • @unpataunpata
    @unpataunpata 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    I'm convinced that this video is to make everyone start looking inward instead of outward

  • @shottasam
    @shottasam 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +86

    i’m honestly so thankful there’s other people going thru an awakening as well, it makes me happy for the future :)

    • @TheGreyShaman
      @TheGreyShaman 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's in waves baby, will you be part of the group that stays or leaves? I myself almost dipped out of this construct of time, but as I was about to fully untether from my vessel, the entities that interact with us via consciousness by implanting thoughts let me know that without me there in between mind and body there would be nothing to dictate which thoughts get to become reality and they'd have free reign down here and cause mayhem starting with my loved ones.
      It was probably a deception to keep me from leaving, the enemy does use our emotions against us after all. But at the same time, what they showed me was too horrifying, being outside my body watching it murder my loved ones and I couldn't do anything but scream at them to stop and experience all the heartbreak, but then I pulled back from that and managed to tether myself back to this vessel. That was a bit too real to have been a deception. It's not my call to decide when I leave.

    • @rodneyhatch56
      @rodneyhatch56 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      what do you mean by "awakening"?

    • @shottasam
      @shottasam 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@TheGreyShaman sounds like u have negative energies attached to u. focus on the positive and stay grounded in ur body.

    • @shottasam
      @shottasam 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@rodneyhatch56 spiritual journey basically, “waking up” to the truth of the universe and excepting it

    • @TheGreyShaman
      @TheGreyShaman 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@shottasam see I was trying to leave, but I'm not ready for what's out there, I got my taste.

  • @cooper2850
    @cooper2850 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +318

    Imagine how far we could get as a species if everyone could at least genuinely consider this being how consciousness works.

    • @breakthecycle5238
      @breakthecycle5238 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      Instead w3 are wasting time and energy arguing over postmodern and transhuman hermetic garbage and can even define what women is 😂😂😂

    • @breakthecycle5238
      @breakthecycle5238 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      *cant

    • @user-hp6fc5yy4d
      @user-hp6fc5yy4d 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@breakthecycle5238 Well its done on purpose to keep us from the real interesting parts of our universe. Capitalism serves the elites well.

    • @antoniorenteria2896
      @antoniorenteria2896 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      You underestimate greed. Or atleast misunderstand it.

    • @ReligionAndMaterialismDebunked
      @ReligionAndMaterialismDebunked 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Agree to unscientific claims that the brain makes consciousness because materialists hated religion so much that they included anything spiritual as false in their dogma that has been used against many via bullying.
      That would help society figure out things how? By telling people that consciousness is material, against the evidence, and then even to go as far a to say consciousness isn't even real, doesn't lift up mankind, actually does the opposite. 💀🤣🤣🤡💩

  • @grod2695
    @grod2695 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +92

    Anybody ever take psychedelics and feel the reality schrodingers describing. Just hearing about it makes me feel it

    • @mattmarinelli5241
      @mattmarinelli5241 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      I’m not sure you will find many people in that boat who will disagree 😊❤

    • @a2taroth
      @a2taroth 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Psychedelic just unlocks everything especially dmt. I relate what ur saying honestly

    • @Shubhankar1999
      @Shubhankar1999 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yep

    • @ReligionAndMaterialismDebunked
      @ReligionAndMaterialismDebunked 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      :3 I researched more into Charles Darwin not being a material atheist again. It's one of the top 10 myths of Darwin, that he was a material atheist, according to even Oxford, and according to a site dedicated to him. He said he rejected religion, especially Christianity, for how brutal it was, but found life to be too incredible to be made by chance, and that science is very limited in regards to how the universe was made, and how it really works.
      Richard Dawkins, while a "Cultural Christian", actually singing Jesus songs, and such, says evolution is incompatible with any deity. However, his entire life's work is based on Darwin, and Darwin said the opposite of what he said. Besides, creationism isn't the only way for life to exist by any deity.
      A lot of material atheists have this debunked myth that some lady spread (according to Oxford, and several sources) about Darwin being an atheist.
      Richard Dawkins is arguably the face of atheism, and while an amazing writer, and very smart in biology, he doesn't even know what Darwin felt about life. Plus, he's been criticized at being a horrible philosopher by several philosophers, and others. The God Delusion many loved, but it was very very basic philosophy.
      Of course, material atheism dogma rejects anything spiritual, and unless the person is very open-minded, or has a near-death experience, or out-of-body experience, then more often than not they'll not even analyze data, nor fund anything that suggest anything other than materialism.
      As well, over 20% of so-called material atheists are spiritual, but they had to poll anonymously due to mockery, and possible career loss, which are common feats of strong materialists, unfortunately so, but not surprisingly so.
      One of the leaders of NDE studies, Dr. Pin van Lommer, was a hardcore materialist, and laughed at NDEs. He, as a cardiologist, realised how much went on without a cortex to run the brain. He switched over to believing into non-materialism.
      Peter Fenwick is a neuropsychiatrist and neuropsychologist who changed his mind on materialism, and has tons of data of NDEs showing how life isn't solely material.
      Dr. Bruce Greyson was raised a materialist, and couldn't help but find patients who were not supposed to be conscious at all, who he even didn't meet yet, describe several real-time events that were fully verified. He did a lot of studies into NDEs, and found out many doctors, nurses, and even the head of the hospital he was at were spiritual, but fake being materialists because of how toxic materialism dogma gets. He has studied NDEs for over 45 years.
      Dr. Even Alexander was a neurosurgeon, which aren't too common, and used to laugh hard at the idea of NDEs being real. He was a very saddened man before his NDE, he said, and his loved ones said. His coma from a very rare virus that almost always kills people, had him out-of-body, and verifying things in real-time, along with finding out about a loved one he never knew of, that he confirmed later (happens often in NDEs). Some tried to debunk him, and his refutes debunk the fake skeptics who claim, with a cop-out, that he's just trying to sell books (even though he's wealthy, and most people who have an NDE don't write books lol). His documentation is at that hospital. Several medical doctors have adored him for his bravery.
      There are cases where technology of today has picked up paranormal activity, that's been reviewed by experts in science, video editing, and so forth, as confirmed true.
      A lot of nonsense exists within the small group of materialists. Most atheists are spiritual, like Buddhists, some Hindu sects, some other faiths, & many atheists consider themselves agnostic-atheists, as Dawkins himself even says he's a 9 out of a 10 for being an atheist.
      Very interesting stuff, especially with quantum mechanics debunking a solely material life.
      Simulation theory is believed by over 50% of scientists (even atheist, DeGrasse Tyson, immediately asked if any creator exists when he heard the breaking news of simulation theory at a science convention).
      Donald Hoffman being a former materialist, that now believes in a conscious-based reality. He believes in a holographic universe, and that we're in avatars. The math keeps adding up to that despite his usual views of materialism. He's well-loved in the science community, though plenty of course reject him, obviously. They reject him because old scientists often times hate new science because it is against materialism, steps on their work (like the James Webb Satellite Telescope debunking the big bang theory recently that many scientists got butthurt over), and a lot of outdated science books exists in so-called schools, they say.
      Tom Campbell (is pro-vegan) was a materialist, alongside a scientist friend, before reading work of Robert Monroe, a pioneer on out-of-body experiences, remote viewing, etc. They helped Monroe build a lab, & a school. The CIA studied there for over 20 years.
      Etc.

    • @jaylucas8352
      @jaylucas8352 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Psychedelics is like a drink that reveals what’s beneath the layer of cultural conditioning imprinted on our neural network /brain……a peek into the unknown hidden beneath our belief patterns of accepted reality

  • @itscalm123
    @itscalm123 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    one thing i know is that i’ll never cease to exist, i may die and cease to be human but im still consciousness. so i have time to figure all this out and i’ll have help on the way. im finding sm pleasure in the process of discovery

    • @makebeauty3861
      @makebeauty3861 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Emily Dickinson said
      That I can look in your eyes and know that you exist and you can look in my eyes and know that I exist not even God can take that away!

    • @nkbrahm6826
      @nkbrahm6826 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Aham brahmasmi

    • @nkbrahm6826
      @nkbrahm6826 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You are existence

  • @Ihavemessageforyou
    @Ihavemessageforyou 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Very interesting thought about our reality, and Shroedinger is certainly not alone. Years back, after coming to Canada and upgrading my high school diploma, in the last of our organic chemistry class, our professor explained to us something that it just "clicked to me". Something was telling me that we may be living in someone's body or more like, inside a brain. I was so compelled by this idea that I couldn't stop myself but to ask my professor at the end of class if she believes we are part of something bigger. And I explained how I felt. She looked at me, smiled, and said "this is exactly what I believe". ❤

    • @cyclonedrums
      @cyclonedrums หลายเดือนก่อน

      "Something was telling me that we may be living in someone's body or more like, inside a brain" Your Brain needs meds

    • @claudiavaluntine1914
      @claudiavaluntine1914 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🤣🤣🤣 Funny!
      But can you prove it otherwise? How about the theory of being a hologram? Or created by "God"? What can you prove? You see, there are all theories, and I am not the only one. You can say the same to the person who created this video. I simply had a feeling of it, I don't believe much in any of these, and it's because everything from the micro to macro things look and work the exact same way. And, BTW, scientists just recreated a newer version of the universe with their new technologies, and guess, it looks just like a brain with its interconnected neuropathways. 🖕

    • @claudiavaluntine1914
      @claudiavaluntine1914 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sorry about the spelling mistakes. It's 4 am and haven't slept yet, and for some weird reason, I cannot edit my reply.

  • @benfinesilver2250
    @benfinesilver2250 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +182

    I have always thought this without knowing about this theory. It’s a consequence of the equation that determines everything. All parts of the universe are intrinsically linked to each other and instantaneously “know”. All possibilities past, present, future have been determined. The universe is the perfect supercomputer of everything.

    • @mattmarinelli5241
      @mattmarinelli5241 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      And have you pondered the “super computer” to that, and next of that, and so on and so forth?

    • @benfinesilver2250
      @benfinesilver2250 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@mattmarinelli5241 Yes and no.
      There is only one everything, unless there are alternate universes. We will likely never be able to know this.
      If there were; then those would be supercomputers of everything within them too.
      The thought beyond that, would be whether alternate universes have influence on other universes or not; that’s if they they exist.

    • @slofty
      @slofty 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Equations don't "determine" things. Gödel comes to mind here.

    • @benfinesilver2250
      @benfinesilver2250 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@slofty equations are everything. Reality is not as we perceive it. The net result of an equation that starts with nothing, is nothing… Yet it is everything to those that are part of it and can observe it at the same time.

    • @RickSanchezpicklerick-jq5tq
      @RickSanchezpicklerick-jq5tq 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So why don't we know everything there is to know instantly?

  • @rayholmes4402
    @rayholmes4402 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +619

    Horrible distracting background music makes this interesting TH-cam video completely unwatchable/unlistenable. Any chance you could repost without the terrible music? . Thanks 🙏 . Much appreciated

    • @annsmith9100
      @annsmith9100 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +68

      Won’t listen to this because of this comment

    • @keithtomey5046
      @keithtomey5046 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      Agreed! I just couldn't go on after a minute or two - such a shame! (Dot)

    • @keithrich2761
      @keithrich2761 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ADHD folk can't listen to it anyways😂

    • @mitchjames9350
      @mitchjames9350 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

      @@annsmith9100it’s not that bad.

    • @annsmith9100
      @annsmith9100 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@mitchjames9350 ok. Thanks for that. I’ll give it a listen

  • @Texan1048
    @Texan1048 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I have raised this question many times to many people, including very smart doctors.... "where do synapses in brains go?" Most of the time they will shrug that off. One time, about 10 years ago, I asked that question to an old semi-retired doctor that really knew more than he should have.... is why he was still on the pay roll. He gave me a smile and said "And that son, is the right question to ask. You answer that, you answer everything."

    • @lockk132
      @lockk132 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      My view if a single neuron is not conscious then it must be given a numerical zero. Therefore 0+0 and 0×0 =0..If this is the truth then neurons are conduits of consciouness but not the source.

    • @Private-wj4nd
      @Private-wj4nd 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lockk132🔔🛎🔔🛎

  • @iamlordapollo
    @iamlordapollo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I just wanna point out something I don't think was intended when you wrote this video.
    If the universe is a brain and the galaxies are neurons with the black holes at the center acting as the nucleus, and the speed of light is impossible to exceed, then transmitting information between these galactic neurons would take millions of light years and our brains are far superior. Let's unpack that a bit.
    Firstly, you brought up our lack of understanding of singularities and the fact that time and space break down with the laws of physics in general. That's the answer the to question. If the universe is a brain, the black holes are likely the built in mechanism to send and receive signals that ignore the limitations of physics, and we simply have yet to discover how it works. I can imagine all of the matter the black hole sucks in being converted to energy and used to send information to other black holes independently from the limitations of time and space outside of the event horizon. That could be how quantum entanglement works. Maybe all singularities are entangled with each other and therefore act as one. Maybe all the millions of black holes are actually a single higher dimensional object. They may contain different matter and form at different times, but maybe they are all manifestations of a single quantum "realm" that can only poke into the lower dimensions we exist in as singularities. So really the information that is traveling between black holes isn't breaking the speed of light at all. It's simply entering and leaving a higher dimensional plane instantly, and the exit just happens to be millions of light years away, but the quantum realm having different physical laws makes it not break the rules.
    Another possibility is that the black holes that are the nucleus are sucking matter to become alive. Perhaps earth bring the only planet capable of sending information thru space is due to the fact that the universe is incredibly young. Maybe one day those black holes will evaporate once they e sucked enough matter and somehow become a catalyst to create more intelligent life. Maybe we just happen to be the first cell in the brain to become alive and all the black holes are potential brain cells that need time to develop in order for the universe brain to function. The universe is still barely past the fertilizations stage if it only has a single cell capable of transmitting information. Give it another decillion millennia to grow and it might become a functioning consciousness once it's got a few billion civilizations all sending signals to each other.

    • @velsparkz9687
      @velsparkz9687 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Time isnt a universal tick tock it increases decreases and bends w space hence spacetime therefore tume would scale up to the multiversal size and b what we perceive the same way black holes effect time

    • @dylanderbyshire6564
      @dylanderbyshire6564 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wrap your brain around this. Our universe is HUGE right? I wonder how big the other ones are? 🤔😉

    • @iamlordapollo
      @iamlordapollo หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@velsparkz9687 that's not true. It's not one or the other it's both. It is a universal tick tock but it also bends and wraps with gravity and is affected by perception

    • @velsparkz9687
      @velsparkz9687 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@iamlordapollo well yes thats basically what i was saying it’s ultimately perspective as i was describing it from an omniscient standpoint

  • @user-fj9ez7kv8p
    @user-fj9ez7kv8p 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    We are the universe experiencing itself from different perspectives the universe is expanding to have as many different experiences as possible to understand itself

    • @InnerLuminosity
      @InnerLuminosity 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Bingo...hello me😉

    • @MM-tx3yn
      @MM-tx3yn 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      But my geniune question with this is why does the universe wants to experience itself? Is it that dumb that it does not know itself?! My question is why? Or is it just for fun?

    • @HH-hm3qn
      @HH-hm3qn 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      ​@MM-tx3yn Because the essence of an experience is that it was actually experienced.. otherwise there is nothing to know!

  • @terrytwotoes3225
    @terrytwotoes3225 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    We have to be the universe becoming aware of itself because what else could be the purpose of consciousness

    • @cherrydoctorpepper7
      @cherrydoctorpepper7 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes. Self-awareness serves no purpose if we have no free will. Logically, our self-awareness seems to be for somebody else.

    • @formalities4983
      @formalities4983 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      You assume a purpose is necessary.

    • @terrytwotoes3225
      @terrytwotoes3225 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      My dog just died today

  • @mada1241
    @mada1241 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    I just love how these theories inch close and closer to the truth we already know, deep within us.

    • @Aaron-ov3mm
      @Aaron-ov3mm 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Which is?

    • @defaultname7685
      @defaultname7685 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@Aaron-ov3mmhe forgor 💀

    • @Mr.Fascinating
      @Mr.Fascinating 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There's a Infinite Creator(A conscience being that doesn't need a temporal material body to exist...Unlike any created being in the universe because he exist outside of our 3D universe....The genius conscience mind behind the universe and all information in it
      AKA God

    • @assassisteve
      @assassisteve 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Aaron-ov3mmThe universe is mental. What we call God, The Infinite, created our, finite, universe by mental projection.

    • @leonardpriestley6822
      @leonardpriestley6822 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That sounds like something white people with dreadlocks would say.

  • @thomaslapins6022
    @thomaslapins6022 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The beauty of all these cosmic theories and possibilities is when seen through Eastern Zen Mystics/Philosophy. Like Fritjof Capra said "The Tao of Physics" a fascinating union --- Eastern Zen with Quantum Physics --- true and eternal love --- worlds without end ❤🎉

    • @imagitu6409
      @imagitu6409 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      western mystic here.... same path with easier to pronounce language.. As above, so below.

  • @xplorerF
    @xplorerF 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    Existence is so weird, the fact that anything exists at all blows my mind! Nothing could exist but for some reason something does, wtf… even if there is a creator, where did they come from & how? It’s truly mind boggling

    • @OverRule1
      @OverRule1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Too complex for "human" understanding. Could you make an ant understand what you know?

    • @kurtwinslow2670
      @kurtwinslow2670 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Logic and reality must be in harmony. For reality can't be absurd, it must be coherent. There's a logical flaw in your question. "Where did they come from & how?"
      Infinite regression is impossible in any reality. Logic demands that there must be something uncaused that's eternal by nature, that initiated the cause and affect reality we currently reside in.

    • @timchurch2390
      @timchurch2390 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I know exactly what you mean. It's seriously so shocking to realize this. Its almost beyond words or emotions to express. It's the most super-natural thing you could possible imagine...yet here it is, totally immersing us inside it

    • @Frankenchild
      @Frankenchild 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kurtwinslow2670there would be no problem of infinite regression if nothing existed - no time, no space, no empty space, no energy, no singularity, no God, Nothing. I don’t have to explain the elephant in my office, if there is no elephant in my office 😉

    • @kurtwinslow2670
      @kurtwinslow2670 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Frankenchild Question? If you went infinitely back, how would you arrive at the here and now?
      Define nothing please.

  • @joshuahoops9430
    @joshuahoops9430 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Imagine when we can look deeper into the human brain and smaller and smaller and we finally see ourselves looking back at us

  • @NaturalFuture
    @NaturalFuture 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The following is not meant to be negative or disrespectful towards the author of this video, but rather constructive. The video is one of the finest explanations I've ever seen on the topic of universal consciousness.
    The problem I wish to relate is this: There is a trend among scientists and the science-minded to mislabel certain important concepts. For instance, when it comes to what to call dark matter--and its opposite.
    When speaking of the form of matter that we can't see--the invisible type that they call "dark" matter--call its opposite--the type that we can see "normal" matter. Usually, when we seek to describe or identify two things that possess opposite characteristics, we assign them names that identify their opposite characteristics--heavy v light, top v bottom, hard v smooth, etc. But, we never shift from, say, smooth v rough to smooth v left. Why not? Because left is not the opposite of smooth. It throws off the line of thought of a logical argument.
    Yet, this is precisely what science minds do when switching from "dark" matter to "normal" matter. Normal isn't the opposite of dark, but light is. Since "dark" matter is in reality invisible matter, don't language and logic tell us that it's correct to call it's opposite--the form of matter we CAN see--"visible" matter? It makes more sense calling these "invisible" v "visible" matter rather than the, in reality, awkward-sounding "dark" v "normal" matter.
    The term "normal" describes a state of being a regular, expected, natural part of something else. Now, if, as scientists now estimate, 31% of our Universe is comprised of visible matter and 69% of invisible matter, it's obvious that BOTH ARE NORMAL. But, by calling the form of matter that we can see "normal," they're failing to admit that the form we can't see is ALSO normal. In fact, they're suggesting to the audience that anything we can't see is 'abnormal.' Yet, again, as we see, all forms of matter AND energy are normal. Let's no longer call the type we can see "normal" in order to highlight the fact that--as compared to the form of matter we can't see--the form we can see is "familiar" to us.
    Those who mislabel the type we can see should change their focus from normal v abnormal to visible v invisible. So, please, PLEASE, start calling the form of matter we can see "visible" matter. Doing so will further improve your otherwise excellent video which helps us understand better the matter of universal consciousness!😁

    • @DJ-Eye
      @DJ-Eye 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It must kick your logical line of thought out of the park to see so many food packets missing the label "This product does not contain nuts". After all they are the opposite of the packets that do.
      Normal matter is matter, the other stuff is temporarily named while we figure out what to call it.
      Question:
      Is the opposite of a Light-Switch called a Dark-Switch? - Sometimes there is no opposite. "Dark" is just a word, it's not very catchy (science is substance over style, you see).
      FWIW visible and invisible aren't very apt names for matter either, because you also need to isolate in which part of the visible spectrum something should be observed. And even if you figure a foolproof naming convention, that will be in just one of many languages that all need to translate without corruption. Even english has problems, DarkLightHeavy etc. I can't see the problem with "there's this normal stuff, then this other stuff we call something else". Would you prefer "Usual matter" and "unusual matter". Whatever you choose, it will be subjective.
      Not meant to offend - just pointing out that not everything a scientist discovers is named for the convenience of youtube viewers.

  • @dentonfender6492
    @dentonfender6492 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +101

    I have always assumed that the single mind (the Tao or universal consciousness) is attempting to experience individualism on a grand scale. Every peudo-mind (ie. our brain) experiences consciousness individually, and most do not know they are actually part of a larger consciousness that represents the single mind.

    • @justinblackwood4241
      @justinblackwood4241 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      This is the same principle behind "The Law of One". I recommend reading up on it

    • @commentcraftsman
      @commentcraftsman 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​​@@justinblackwood4241so if I can only default to that one I'll be good...

    • @user-BossMan
      @user-BossMan 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@justinblackwood4241 the author is on the top of my tongue!! Please.. that is who??

    • @W3TSU1T
      @W3TSU1T 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@user-BossManthe Egyptian god Thoth

    • @SaturnFarr
      @SaturnFarr 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Maybe people with multiple personality disorder are proof of a collective unconscious

  • @michaeldashnaw2503
    @michaeldashnaw2503 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    Is the circus music really necessary?

    • @len6908
      @len6908 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂

    • @nfaplayer4486
      @nfaplayer4486 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s terrible😂

  • @scottward6974
    @scottward6974 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    If the universe is a mind and we're in it, we wouldn't necessarily see the mechanisms involved. We could be in a sort of dream the universe is having. When you have a dream, everything in it is imaginary, including you. I've had lucid dreams where there are loads of other people about doing their own things seemingly autonomous. I looked at my hand and realised it wasn't really my hand. I couldn't see my neural network firing signals about but it was my brain creating everything. People even spontaneously interacted with me and I didn't feel like I was making them do it.

  • @dmsoundcollective6746
    @dmsoundcollective6746 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    what a awesome explanation of the belief that we are the universe experiencing itself. I had no idea that Schrodinger had studied hinduism and buddhism . I'll have to check out his books ;)

  • @michaelwargo5702
    @michaelwargo5702 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +68

    MUSIC TOO LOUD 😮😮😮😮😮

    • @InspireForward369
      @InspireForward369 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      true, unable to focus

    • @KrystianGage
      @KrystianGage 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@InspireForward369willful ignorance

    • @aruvielevenstar3944
      @aruvielevenstar3944 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And the voice to stressed out.

    • @The5thnail
      @The5thnail 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Absolutely it is

    • @The5thnail
      @The5thnail 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@KrystianGagewho are you to judge them.

  • @dylanseverus5929
    @dylanseverus5929 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +72

    Was listening to this half-sleep and shot my eyes open to say that the universe has to have consciousness

    • @chrisdaldy-rowe4978
      @chrisdaldy-rowe4978 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@bigscientificquestions Row row row your boat hey lol

    • @Nostalgicus
      @Nostalgicus 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😱😂

  • @knarftrakiul3881
    @knarftrakiul3881 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    I think just as the universe is boundless so are things in opposition direction. There is no limit on how small particles can get

    • @BriarLeaf00
      @BriarLeaf00 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm pretty sure everything smaller than the Planck length completely breaks down but I'm more than willing to listen to any evidence that Planck as well as so many generations of theorists are wrong though. I keep an open mind.

    • @BriarLeaf00
      @BriarLeaf00 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @fudgeholeJenkins how does that in any way conflict with my statement? Re-read it.

    • @christinebeames712
      @christinebeames712 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is match being good, but do you really think we need that background music?

    • @BriarLeaf00
      @BriarLeaf00 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @fudgeholeJenkins oh I see now, you have no idea what you are talking about, ya goof.

  • @naxar4246
    @naxar4246 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Brilliant presentation! Clear and very educational. Thank you very much!

    • @bigscientificquestions
      @bigscientificquestions  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thank you very much for this wonderful comment 😊

  • @susiefairfield7218
    @susiefairfield7218 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +88

    What we call imagination is actually the universal library of what's real. You couldn’t imagine it if it weren’t real somewhere, sometime.
    ~Terence McKenna

    • @Demortixx
      @Demortixx 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      No

    • @kennythelenny6819
      @kennythelenny6819 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Dude I have told myself this like how can we imagine something that doesn't exist like vampires? It must come from somewhere. Where is this somewhere?

    • @susiefairfield7218
      @susiefairfield7218 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@Demortixx Stories of imagination tend to upset those without one.
      ~Terry Pratchett

    • @Allyourheroswenttohell
      @Allyourheroswenttohell 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@kennythelenny6819philosophers stone symbolism. There's layers to that.

    • @Allyourheroswenttohell
      @Allyourheroswenttohell 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@susiefairfield7218yeah I've noticed

  • @tyamada21
    @tyamada21 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    A segment from 'Saved by the Light of the Buddha Within'...
    My new understandings of what many call 'God -The Holy Spirit' - resulting from some of the extraordinary ongoing after-effects relating to my NDE...
    Myoho-Renge-Kyo represents the identity of what some scientists are now referring to as the unified field of consciousnesses. In other words, it’s the essence of all existence and non-existence - the ultimate creative force behind planets, stars, nebulae, people, animals, trees, fish, birds, and all phenomena, manifest or latent. All matter and intelligence are simply waves or ripples manifesting to and from this core source. Consciousness (enlightenment) is itself the actual creator of everything that exists now, ever existed in the past, or will exist in the future - right down to the minutest particles of dust - each being an individual ripple or wave.
    The big difference between chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo and most other conventional prayers is that instead of depending on a ‘middleman’ to connect us to our state of inner enlightenment, we’re able to do it ourselves. That’s because chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo allows us to tap directly into our enlightened state by way of this self-produced sound vibration. ‘Who or What Is God?’ If we compare the concept of God being a separate entity that is forever watching down on us, to the teachings of Nichiren, it makes more sense to me that the true omnipotence, omniscience and omnipresence of what most people perceive to be God, is the fantastic state of enlightenment that exists within each of us. Some say that God is an entity that’s beyond physical matter - I think that the vast amount of information continuously being conveyed via electromagnetic waves in today’s world gives us proof of how an invisible state of God could indeed exist.
    For example, it’s now widely known that specific data relayed by way of electromagnetic waves has the potential to help bring about extraordinary and powerful effects - including an instant global awareness of something or a mass emotional reaction. It’s also common knowledge that these invisible waves can easily be used to detonate a bomb or to enable NASA to control the movements of a robot as far away as the Moon or Mars - none of which is possible without a receiver to decode the information that’s being transmitted. Without the receiver, the data would remain impotent. In a very similar way, we need to have our own ‘receiver’ switched on so that we can activate a clear and precise understanding of our own life, all other life and what everything else in existence is.
    Chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo each day helps us to achieve this because it allows us to reach the core of our enlightenment and keep it switched on. That’s because Myoho-Renge-Kyo represents the identity of what scientists now refer to as the unified field of consciousnesses. To break it down - Myoho represents the Law of manifestation and latency (Nature) and consists of two alternating states. For example, the state of Myo is where everything in life that’s not obvious to us exists - including our stored memories when we’re not thinking about them - our hidden potential and inner emotions whenever they’re dormant - our desires, our fears, our wisdom, happiness, karma - and more importantly, our enlightenment.
    The other state, ho, is where everything in Life exists whenever it becomes evident to us, such as when a thought pops up from within our memory - whenever we experience or express our emotions - or whenever a good or bad cause manifests as an effect from our karma. When anything becomes apparent, it merely means that it’s come out of the state of Myo (dormancy/latency) and into a state of ho (manifestation). It’s the difference between consciousness and unconsciousness, being awake or asleep, or knowing and not knowing.
    The second law - Renge - Ren meaning cause and ge meaning effect, governs and controls the functions of Myoho - these two laws of Myoho and Renge, not only function together simultaneously but also underlies all spiritual and physical existence.
    The final and third part of the tri-combination - Kyo, is the Law that allows Myoho to integrate with Renge - or vice versa. It’s the great, invisible thread of energy that fuses and connects all Life and matter - as well as the past, present and future. It’s also sometimes termed the Universal Law of Communication - perhaps it could even be compared with the string theory that many scientists now suspect exists.
    Just as the cells in our body, our thoughts, feelings and everything else is continually fluctuating within us - all that exists in the world around us and beyond is also in a constant state of flux - constantly controlled by these three fundamental laws. In fact, more things are going back and forth between the two states of Myo and ho in a single moment than it would ever be possible to calculate or describe. And it doesn’t matter how big or small, famous or trivial anything or anyone may appear to be, everything that’s ever existed in the past, exists now or will exist in the future, exists only because of the workings of the Laws ‘Myoho-Renge-Kyo’ - the basis of the four fundamental forces, and if they didn’t function, neither we nor anything else could go on existing. That’s because all forms of existence, including the seasons, day, night, birth, death and so on, are moving forward in an ongoing flow of continuation - rhythmically reverting back and forth between the two fundamental states of Myo and ho in absolute accordance with Renge - and by way of Kyo. Even stars are dying and being reborn under the workings of what the combination ‘Myoho-Renge-Kyo’ represents. Nam, or Namu - which mean the same thing, are vibrational passwords or keys that allow us to reach deep into our life and fuse with or become one with ‘Myoho-Renge-Kyo’.
    On a more personal level, nothing ever happens by chance or coincidence, it’s the causes that we’ve made in our past, or are presently making, that determine how these laws function uniquely in each of our lives - as well as the environment from moment to moment. By facing east, in harmony with the direction that the Earth is spinning, and chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo for a minimum of, let’s say, ten minutes daily to start with, any of us can experience actual proof of its positive effects in our lives - even if it only makes us feel good on the inside, there will be a definite positive effect. That’s because we’re able to pierce through the thickest layers of our karma and activate our inherent Buddha Nature (our enlightened state). By so doing, we’re then able to bring forth the wisdom and good fortune that we need to challenge, overcome and change our adverse circumstances - turn them into positive ones - or manifest and gain even greater fulfilment in our daily lives from our accumulated good karma. This also allows us to bring forth the wisdom that can free us from the ignorance and stupidity that’s preventing us from accepting and being proud of the person that we indeed are - regardless of our race, colour, gender or sexuality. We’re also able to see and understand our circumstances and the environment far more clearly, as well as attract and connect with any needed external beneficial forces and situations. As I’ve already mentioned, everything is subject to the law of Cause and Effect - the ‘actual-proof-strength’ resulting from chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo always depends on our determination, sincerity and dedication.
    For example, the levels of difference could be compared to making a sound on a piano, creating a melody, producing a great song, and so on. Something else that’s very important to always respect and acknowledge is that the Law (or if you prefer God) is in everyone and everything.
    NB: There are frightening and disturbing sounds, and there are tranquil and relaxing sounds. It’s the emotional result of any noise or sound that can trigger off a mood or even instantly change one. When chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo each day, we are producing a sound vibration that’s the password to our true inner-self - this soon becomes apparent when you start reassessing your views on various things - such as your fears and desires etc. The best way to get the desired result when chanting is not to view things conventionally - rather than reaching out to an external source, we need to reach into our own lives and bring our needs and desires to fruition from within - including the good fortune and strength to achieve any help that we may need. Chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo also reaches out externally and draws us towards, or draws towards us, what we need to make us happy from our environment. For example, it helps us to be in the right place at the right time - to make better choices and decisions and so forth. We need to think of it as a seed within us that we’re watering and bringing sunshine to for it to grow, blossom and bring forth fruit or flowers. It’s also important to understand that everything we need in life, including the answer to every question and the potential to achieve every dream, already exists within us.

    • @3mountains307
      @3mountains307 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You are already it. Living universe.

    • @jamesstevenson7725
      @jamesstevenson7725 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Myoho Renge Kyo

    • @fgh2756
      @fgh2756 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's awesome thank you for this. I believe David lynch holds similar beliefs regarding consciousness

    • @felixgarstka
      @felixgarstka 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      TLDR

    • @tyamada21
      @tyamada21 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      PEMT?
      @@felixgarstka

  • @lenamato9332
    @lenamato9332 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Excellent!! A plethora of profound speculation, I venture to say, destined for confirmation at least in part. Mille grazie! 🌏💙

  • @kevinlee8011
    @kevinlee8011 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Agree the ambient music (sounds like an adaptation of Revel’s Bolero?) is discordant and dysynchronous for such an auspicious and austere topic!

  • @suecondon1685
    @suecondon1685 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +145

    Apart from the distracting music in the first bit, this is absolutely fascinating. I'd love to know who wrote it, it's so well written.

    • @borghorsa1902
      @borghorsa1902 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      H0rrible music choice, bunch of noise. There is so much good appropriate music, like Hiemal for example,

    • @opamp7292
      @opamp7292 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Horrible music!!!!!! Please stop it!!!

    • @rafael9841
      @rafael9841 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Too much for my taste, feels like listening to The Architect from Matrix 2.

    • @gremlinn7
      @gremlinn7 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      I can't decide if the narration is done by a particularly convincing text-to-speech program, or if humans are getting good at droning on just as dispassionately as one.

    • @kdchannel9355
      @kdchannel9355 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      chatgpt

  • @walkabout16
    @walkabout16 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +132

    In Schrödinger's world of quantum grace,
    A universe we strive to truly embrace,
    Where particles dance in waves of chance,
    In a conscious cosmos, we take our stance.
    With cat and box in paradox's game,
    A thought experiment with no one to blame,
    A feline both alive and deceased,
    In a conscious universe, a puzzle released.
    In superposition, we find our place,
    Both here and there, in a quantum space,
    Conscious observers, the key it seems,
    To collapse the wave, to shatter the dreams.
    Uncertainty reigns, but beauty as well,
    In a conscious universe, where mysteries swell,
    A cat in limbo, a universe aware,
    Of the choices we make, the burdens we bear.
    In entanglement's web, particles connect,
    No matter the distance, no matter effect,
    Consciousness weaves a cosmic thread,
    In Schrödinger's theory, where worlds are spread.
    This conscious universe, a tapestry grand,
    Woven by minds, a collective hand,
    With each observation, a universe anew,
    In Schrödinger's vision, the cosmic view.
    So, ponder these theories, let wonder arise,
    In Schrödinger's realm where reality lies,
    In a conscious universe, we're intertwined,
    In the quantum dance of the cosmic mind.

  • @n0body550
    @n0body550 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I literally just gave myself a monologue on why our very birth is the most miraculous thing in the universe, then this pops up on my recommended 😂

  • @gme602
    @gme602 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I had this same idea one time when I was tripping! That blows my mind

  • @darrellmay4502
    @darrellmay4502 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

    I have said in the past that our whole Universe could be one cell on a giant body within an outer reality!, fractal science made me think that way as a possibilty!

    • @wayneasiam65
      @wayneasiam65 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Wow, ease up on the shrooms...

    • @PuBearsticks
      @PuBearsticks 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      ​@@wayneasiam65it's not implausible

    • @nicolecarnevale3226
      @nicolecarnevale3226 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      My husband asked posed this question after I explained just how complex molecular biology is.
      White cells organizing, waging war, interleukins, negative feedback loops etc.
      He said “ molecular biology is a world within in world. Perhaps we are in something much larger..”
      The comment was intriguing.
      Perhaps,..

    • @ec4020
      @ec4020 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The ancients wrote many books about this.
      Just as the tree is the seed folded up,
      so the world is God unfolded

    • @mitchjames9350
      @mitchjames9350 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Makes sense due to space it self is a form of energy and energy being the main factor for all of existence, matter can not exist without energy.

  • @zoomby4380
    @zoomby4380 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    "Know thy self" to know, is to experience, to experience is to know . In the silence, no thoughts are required to know everything. From experience into knowing silence, from the smallest to the vastness of no time, no space and back again. 😊

  • @lisamuir8850
    @lisamuir8850 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    37:30 i appreciate the time stamps. Im researching quite a bit and like to look back to see what i was dealing with and my actions i took around the changing that occured. I do stay away from the why beginning questions though.

  • @emcee3444
    @emcee3444 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wow man . . . Hah !! This is exactly what I've come to believe throughout my 45yrs of life even tho i don't have a university degree . . This Schroedinger fella was just able to put it into words where my vocabulary eludes me but i FULLY get what is being explained here !!

  • @Arlet11369
    @Arlet11369 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    The way I see it is that there's possibility that this universe is a sentient being and we're living within them and since there's a multiverse then there's unlimited beings out there with millions of galaxies and other beings living within them aswell. Like the movie antman, but in this case we're the subatomic atoms.

    • @bethanygee6939
      @bethanygee6939 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      This has always felt true to me

    • @PixelatedExistence
      @PixelatedExistence 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We could even be in the brain of a mouse or a worm....anything that has the same neural structure we observe in our universe. We would never know if its a person or animal or alien...It could just be we are buzzing around in a flies brain. 😵‍💫

  • @heartofthunder1440
    @heartofthunder1440 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    This is exactly what I pondered on too, kinda strange to think. That we live in the creators brain, but I imagine we are experiencing the same things the creator being is experiencing too, and so on.

  • @Blalack77
    @Blalack77 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'll probably have to listen to that again but it sounds like something I've thought a lot about and something I've mentioned to people but they never seem to understand what I mean. But specifically, among other things, I have always felt like it's literally impossible to verify things like, if people other than yourself actually have their own mind and/or if they're even real or just NPCs or hallucinations - like, if from your own perspective, you are the only real person with a mind in existence.
    There's absolutely no way to prove or disprove it because you can't insert your own consciousness into someone else's mind to see if they have thoughts and a working mind. It sounds all weird and esoteric and arcane but it's just one of those weird conditions created by the nature of reality and consciousness.
    But that kind of segues into another sub-thought surrounding this. In the same way you can't step outside of yourself and verify the existence of other minds/consciousnesses, I believe there are certain areas of science/study/research around the topics of reality, existence, consciousness, the mind, quantum/astrophysics, neuroscience, etc. that we'll never be able to completely solve/understand since we are contained within and surrounded by the the phenomena being studied.
    Like we're contained within our own minds, we're inside/part of the universe and reality, etc. and it's impossible to step outside of settings like these to get an external, objective, complete view. I think we can understand these things to a degree and like for instance, the things scientists have learned about the nature of the universe and it's creation are mind-blowing.
    But no matter how much we learn, I think there will always be infinitely more to the picture that we'll never see, understand or even realize it exists - like from our perspectives and with our finite and limited, though complex/curious/creative/ingenious, minds and capabilities, we can only ever understand a tiny sliver of those most profound topics - like the mind/soul/consciousness, the universe/reality/time, the nature/meaning/purpose/beginning of everything, etc.
    We might unify physics and Einstein's theories and finally discover the theory of everything but I don't think we could even start to scratch the surface of everything - and again, from our own kind of static, encapsulated position, no matter how much we learn, there would be no way to verify if that was everything since we can't step outside and check for other things beyond our perception and understanding...
    I'm not very smart or eloquent or expressive but my mind has been stuck in high philosophy gear my entire life and I constantly think about stuff like this - which has always kind of turned off all but the deepest thinking people around me. People act like thinking and pondering physically hurts them...

  • @Doors_of_janua
    @Doors_of_janua 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Just the thought of the existence of infinite space is beyond astonishing…

  • @NaturalFuture
    @NaturalFuture 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Another thing to consider when exploring the universe-brain's speed of processing and limitations in its internal cognitive abilities is to factor in the phenomenon of entanglement. If entanglement occurs beyond the speed of light--which some scientists of late describe as being the maximum velocity at which information (which is what light is) can travel WITHIN spacetime--it opens the possibility (along with a theoretical universal "inflation field"--that information CAN exceed this maximum in-ST speed limit and travel at vastly-expanded velocities possible within the greater exterior extra-universal region they call "the bulk," or hyperspace. If this is what makes instantaneous communication between paired objects at the quantum level possible, this could mean the posited "universe-brain" can communicate rather quickly than universal consciousness researchers presently allow.

  • @drivethrupoet
    @drivethrupoet 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    our entire universe could be just one grain of sand on the beach of a larger world

    • @ymaysernameuay1113
      @ymaysernameuay1113 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      and that larger would could be in a grain of sand in a larger world, and so on and so forth. When do we get to the initial world? And how did that world begin?

    • @starlightgirl8863
      @starlightgirl8863 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don’t think so 😂😂. We are too complex

  • @lisamuir8850
    @lisamuir8850 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    13:50 i would theorize while feeling strongly that it is somewhat the resemblance of each others existence or perhaps the mirror effect just as you confront youself and know you see more than what is actually there. It makes sense to me if most have been formulated and studied, it fits on what is being implied. Apologies for not having the correct words and visiual expression. I find myself going as deep and far as space does at times. Thank God, I can finally expand myself. Lol

  • @frialsharefabdo7715
    @frialsharefabdo7715 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    💚🙏 From Syria
    " Multiplicity is only apparent . In Truth , there is only One Mind ."
    ~ Erwin Schrodinger
    " We are all one . Only egos , beliefs , and fears separate us ."
    ~ Nikola Tesla
    " Everything emerges and returns to a fundamental field of information that connects us all ."
    ~ Nassim Haramein
    " A human being is a part of the whole called by us universe , a part limited in time and space ...."
    ~ Albert Einstein

  • @cliftongaither6642
    @cliftongaither6642 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    through our eyes , the universe is aware of itself.
    can't remember who said that .

    • @jack00scarecrow
      @jack00scarecrow 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      through our eyes, the universe is perceiving itself. Through our ears, the universe is listening to its harmonies. We are the witnesses through which the universe becomes conscious of its glory, or its magnificence Quote from Alan Watts

  • @Wiseman108
    @Wiseman108 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    Could we in fact be the strings that string theory is looking for? Imagine if we are all strings vibrating and sending out waves that we bounce between each other. Our senses could be how we perceive those waves in a way that makes sense to our consciousness. This would mean that the first dimension could actually be consciousness with the others building outward from there.

    • @SOLIDSNAKE.
      @SOLIDSNAKE. 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      You vibrate on shrooms

    • @docacuwatson
      @docacuwatson 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@SOLIDSNAKE.The fabric of the universe falls away on shrooms. You become everything that ever existed and ever will.

    • @SOLIDSNAKE.
      @SOLIDSNAKE. 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@docacuwatson EXACTLY! I would really love to procure some

  • @angelicaperez7615
    @angelicaperez7615 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    My brain almost exploded thinking about what he said in the intro

  • @1027HANA-lc5ke
    @1027HANA-lc5ke 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I do believe their is something beyond something but we are here connecting to the universe from just the Laws from cause and effect.

  • @williamgreene4834
    @williamgreene4834 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    We don't know what the universe is, or why it is, or how it is, or where it is. other than that we got it nailed. :)

    • @locdawg3815
      @locdawg3815 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Have you seen the world lately? We're a far cry from being toxic waste. We put nails on the coffin with nothing inside. That's how this world works.

    • @dennisbailey6067
      @dennisbailey6067 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yep, we're on the home stretch now.

  • @Illumignostic
    @Illumignostic 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    I have thought we were the universe’s sensory organs since childhood

    • @3mountains307
      @3mountains307 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Me, too.

    • @2ndhandjoke
      @2ndhandjoke 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      We are all Gods personal video cameras housed in flesh and given free will ,(supposedly) to experience LIFE and Emotions again.

    • @nefelipapadi9608
      @nefelipapadi9608 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@2ndhandjoke see it the same way!

    • @bystandersarah
      @bystandersarah 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      But some people are other types of organs😂

    • @TheSCPStudio
      @TheSCPStudio 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      These types of comments are the ‘pick me’ women of the science community lmao

  • @slapsmcgee8434
    @slapsmcgee8434 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    With wormholes being quantum connectors to black holes it would make sense that the universe is a brain. Like a being dying, trying to hold itself together as it slowly spreads out and fades away

  • @markbishop9225
    @markbishop9225 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The theories get wilder and wilder as time goes on

    • @PranaChi369
      @PranaChi369 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That the point we are evolving life in real time as the "theories" expand.

  • @azcomintel
    @azcomintel 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    Pantheism and panpsychism are both conclusions I'd reached early in life and your video helped me expand my ideas without reaching any conclusions (as usual). Thanks for the presentation.

    • @bigscientificquestions
      @bigscientificquestions  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Thank you! I'm glad you liked it. 😊

    • @ReligionAndMaterialismDebunked
      @ReligionAndMaterialismDebunked 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      XD I researched more into Charles Darwin not being a material atheist again. It's one of the top 10 myths of Darwin, that he was a material atheist, according to even Oxford, and according to a site dedicated to him. He said he rejected religion, especially Christianity, for how brutal it was, but found life to be too incredible to be made by chance, and that science is very limited in regards to how the universe was made, and how it really works.
      Richard Dawkins, while a "Cultural Christian", actually singing Jesus songs, and such, says evolution is incompatible with any deity. However, his entire life's work is based on Darwin, and Darwin said the opposite of what he said. Besides, creationism isn't the only way for life to exist by any deity.
      A lot of material atheists have this debunked myth that some lady spread (according to Oxford, and several sources) about Darwin being an atheist.
      Richard Dawkins is arguably the face of atheism, and while an amazing writer, and very smart in biology, he doesn't even know what Darwin felt about life. Plus, he's been criticized at being a horrible philosopher by several philosophers, and others. The God Delusion many loved, but it was very very basic philosophy.
      Of course, material atheism dogma rejects anything spiritual, and unless the person is very open-minded, or has a near-death experience, or out-of-body experience, then more often than not they'll not even analyze data, nor fund anything that suggest anything other than materialism.
      As well, over 20% of so-called material atheists are spiritual, but they had to poll anonymously due to mockery, and possible career loss, which are common feats of strong materialists, unfortunately so, but not surprisingly so.
      One of the leaders of NDE studies, Dr. Pin van Lommer, was a hardcore materialist, and laughed at NDEs. He, as a cardiologist, realised how much went on without a cortex to run the brain. He switched over to believing into non-materialism.
      Peter Fenwick is a neuropsychiatrist and neuropsychologist who changed his mind on materialism, and has tons of data of NDEs showing how life isn't solely material.
      Dr. Bruce Greyson was raised a materialist, and couldn't help but find patients who were not supposed to be conscious at all, who he even didn't meet yet, describe several real-time events that were fully verified. He did a lot of studies into NDEs, and found out many doctors, nurses, and even the head of the hospital he was at were spiritual, but fake being materialists because of how toxic materialism dogma gets. He has studied NDEs for over 45 years.
      Dr. Even Alexander was a neurosurgeon, which aren't too common, and used to laugh hard at the idea of NDEs being real. He was a very saddened man before his NDE, he said, and his loved ones said. His coma from a very rare virus that almost always kills people, had him out-of-body, and verifying things in real-time, along with finding out about a loved one he never knew of, that he confirmed later (happens often in NDEs). Some tried to debunk him, and his refutes debunk the fake skeptics who claim, with a cop-out, that he's just trying to sell books (even though he's wealthy, and most people who have an NDE don't write books lol). His documentation is at that hospital. Several medical doctors have adored him for his bravery.
      There are cases where technology of today has picked up paranormal activity, that's been reviewed by experts in science, video editing, and so forth, as confirmed true.
      A lot of nonsense exists within the small group of materialists. Most atheists are spiritual, like Buddhists, some Hindu sects, some other faiths, & many atheists consider themselves agnostic-atheists, as Dawkins himself even says he's a 9 out of a 10 for being an atheist.
      Very interesting stuff, especially with quantum mechanics debunking a solely material life.
      Simulation theory is believed by over 50% of scientists (even atheist, DeGrasse Tyson, immediately asked if any creator exists when he heard the breaking news of simulation theory at a science convention).
      Donald Hoffman being a former materialist, that now believes in a conscious-based reality. He believes in a holographic universe, and that we're in avatars. The math keeps adding up to that despite his usual views of materialism. He's well-loved in the science community, though plenty of course reject him, obviously. They reject him because old scientists often times hate new science because it is against materialism, steps on their work (like the James Webb Satellite Telescope debunking the big bang theory recently that many scientists got butthurt over), and a lot of outdated science books exists in so-called schools, they say.
      Tom Campbell (is pro-vegan) was a materialist, alongside a scientist friend, before reading work of Robert Monroe, a pioneer on out-of-body experiences, remote viewing, etc. They helped Monroe build a lab, & a school. The CIA studied there for over 20 years.
      Etc.

  • @alistairdale4130
    @alistairdale4130 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    This is interesting and thank you for making and sharing these. I just wanted to offer some criticism in case it may be useful from the perspective of this viewer. 1) I found the background music a little distracting and inappropriate at times, and 2) The cadence of the voice natation seemed a bit unnatural in a robotic kind of way.
    I look forward to your future creations.

  • @TheEnigmaUniverse-vt2pm
    @TheEnigmaUniverse-vt2pm 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Finally! The documentary narrated by an actual human being. Which is so much nicer than computer generated voices. It made this documentary so enjoyable I will listen to the whole thing. And I'm only a minute into it and I've already enjoying it

    • @lego7315
      @lego7315 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Now I am confused

  • @ionut5576
    @ionut5576 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    As a kid I was constantly thinking about this

  • @hiphopgeeks
    @hiphopgeeks 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    Excellent message, I think the video pace at 0.75 speed is much better. Namaste 🙏

    • @highlight_anon8907
      @highlight_anon8907 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Is our reality glitching? My speed wont change

    • @danmurray1143
      @danmurray1143 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @highlight_anon8907 In another universe you have already rewatched this at 0.75 speed & now understand it.

    • @highlight_anon8907
      @highlight_anon8907 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      🤯 your right and .25

    • @sandralynpierce1513
      @sandralynpierce1513 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes. Thank you!

    • @redinabloogs8477
      @redinabloogs8477 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I think the video without the music would b 100% better

  • @loslore
    @loslore 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    22:18 if one part of the universe communicates with the other part, it would take 90 billion years relative to our perspective, but to the universe body, whose universe brain were talking about is, to that thing it would only be a fraction of a second… just like one neuron on one side of our brain communicating another one on the other side in a flash of a second, to a small bit of consciousness on an individual neuron in our brain is 90 billion years

  • @StanleyNunn
    @StanleyNunn 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    An excellent exploration of a variety of interesting ideas.

  • @Ghryst
    @Ghryst 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Schrodinger obviously wasnt familiar with Split brain case studies (where the left and right hemispheres are physically separated while living, their nerve connections cut) which is a substantial debunking of this idea, as those people clearly display two separate consciousnesses that are independent and unaware of each others existence within the one body

  • @zakkshort9720
    @zakkshort9720 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I've believed in this for years and didn't even know it was a theory. Amazing work!

    • @bigscientificquestions
      @bigscientificquestions  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Thank you so much 😊

    • @Ezekiel903
      @Ezekiel903 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      get out of my Brain!

    • @AllUserNamesAreUsed
      @AllUserNamesAreUsed 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I thought of it about a year ago in the form of an epiphany-- it blew my mind! But I felt really alone not having anyone to even consider the thought with me. I just found this and am glad others have considered it as well!

  • @mr.pritchard67
    @mr.pritchard67 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I had a mushroom trip that made me ponder the exact same question as the title. This could explain another form of the multiverse.

  • @mistro0014
    @mistro0014 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Starfield is incredible. I just played over 150 hours and just finished the main story. One of the best games I beat this year. 29 games beaten this year this was one of the best

  • @DJKILLAHKAH
    @DJKILLAHKAH 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This theory is ancient and comes in many forms but I believe the earliest is hermeticism. 1st universal law is mentalism which explains this. The Kybalion is a good reference and a good read

  • @annakrystynastankov3781
    @annakrystynastankov3781 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    beautifully written and put together and analysed and narrated ! Thank you
    One small remark the background audio .,. Should either totally different or none st all

  • @ya2a16
    @ya2a16 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    No need for the background music, it's so loud, better without

    • @JavierBonillaC
      @JavierBonillaC 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wait, I was just here for the music. Just kidding.

    • @FRANKMANGIAPANE
      @FRANKMANGIAPANE 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I agree 100%!

  • @RichD424
    @RichD424 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    “You have an active imagination” just took a whole new dimension.

  • @bigswampdog1
    @bigswampdog1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What beautiful vocabulary. I really enjoyed this.

  • @Aaron-fl2iv
    @Aaron-fl2iv 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The slit experiment is good enough reason to believe that all the matter in the Universe didn't act, or was not subject to today's measurements because there were no conscious observers within the closed system.
    This, in my opinion, is enough evidence to support the Young Earth Theory.

  • @wayneasiam65
    @wayneasiam65 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    All guess are equally valid, especially when you understand that we really haven't a clue. Neither did Schrödinger.

  • @douglasperry8211
    @douglasperry8211 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Great music! It's not awful, irritating, distracting, or redundant at all! If you believe that then this video is for you. If not you then you probably have a headache just like me. I made it 7 (seven) minutes before I had enough and went straight for the comments to say...
    PLEASE, FOR GOD'S SAKE CHANGE THIS BACK-GROUND
    MUSIC!

  • @PaperPlateClorox
    @PaperPlateClorox 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What is the physical framing in which we reside? Is it also organic? I loooove this type of stuff.

  • @custossecretus5737
    @custossecretus5737 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Yes, it’s just like the beano predicted years ago with the numskulls, just way smaller. 😅

  • @kattiieupshaw6149
    @kattiieupshaw6149 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Im freaking out! I once ate 3.5g of shrooms and had an epiphany so big it made me gasp for air. It was that all we are is a thought

  • @ardenspiro1436
    @ardenspiro1436 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    No way has been one of my fundemental theories for years. Cent believe shrödinger best me to it

  • @aogm720401
    @aogm720401 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    A few years ago, during very deep meditation, it came to my mind that the conscience of the Universe uses us as peep holes to learn more about itself.

  • @EClark-dj7gh
    @EClark-dj7gh 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    There is much more to us than we've been lead to believe. I have taken many extremely deep dives into my consciousness through psychedelic experiences and I can say with full confidence that things are not as they seem. As far as I can tell, we are projecting consciousness from somewhere else. There are indeed many of ourselves that we're connected to, but we only perceive them as a single individual. You are connected to all selves within what one would call the "multiverse". (I do not like the term "multiverse" because I think there is much more to it than what has been presented as the multiverse.) The choices you make in any particular moment will depend on which self you branch off to. Although, the self that chose the opposite of what you chose still exists, and the universe they're in still exists. Everything is happening at once. Time is an illusion. All outcomes must be possible and reality. It has to be for free will to exist at all. If it doesn't, you're in a play, preforming a script that has already been written and have no free will. At it's base, it's solipsism. You are here alone. In your own universe. There are other people, but you are connected to them through the "multiverse". Interaction with others is an intersection of separate universes in that moment. You are having a unique individual experience, in a world made specifically for you. The best evidence of this is subjectivity. If you think a songs great, and I think it sucks, it's actually both. There is not a right, or wrong answer. The reality is fluid. It all depends on the perception of the individual. This goes for all things. We attempt to give great meaning to this existence. It is only but a single experience. Although important, it means very little in the grand scheme of things. A single drop in the bucket of experience. The ego hides this from us. Upon ego death, it becomes clear that we are all part of a single source consciousness. All experience joining as one. The purpose for this seems to be impossible to know, even within deep psychedelic experiences.
    So yes, there IS only one brain in the universe.
    Yours......
    for the universe would not exist without it.

    • @Audrey-mh1pq
      @Audrey-mh1pq 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Well said, well written ;)

    • @EClark-dj7gh
      @EClark-dj7gh 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Audrey-mh1pq
      Thank you 💞

    • @Shubhankar1999
      @Shubhankar1999 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      That's beautiful. That's what I believe too. I started on self quest quite a while ago. I started meditating, to know myself, who am I , why I am here. And though I can't have answers to these questions In the journey I started getting hints from somewhere I don't know that we all are one, same conscious flows in every human , animal, microbes but our mind is ours alone which says you are the centre , you can call it ego . Upon killing our ego, and understanding our mind you can see through the Consciousness , this actually brings miracle, I can just gaze upon a Individual and can scan his entire mind,......shit I am branching off the topic. But yeah Consciousness is an amazing entity. I believe that Universe created us to understand itself

    • @EClark-dj7gh
      @EClark-dj7gh 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Shubhankar1999
      Thank you!!!! Yes, I've come to my conclusions based on years of searching for answers. Taking knowledge from this world into various states of consciousness will produce an inner knowing if there is truth within that knowledge. It resonates. Also the experiences themselves will give you knowledge as well. Is what I posted exactly as it is? No, I think there is much more to it. Much more than we can comprehend with our very limited perspective as human beings. Language alone is a huge barrier when it comes to what you can experience in these "realms of consciousness". Some things are too much to describe with words. However, I do believe this is a good basic outline of how things work.

    • @Shubhankar1999
      @Shubhankar1999 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@EClark-dj7gh exactly. Language is a barrier. Words cannot describe these topics

  • @InglouriousBradsterd
    @InglouriousBradsterd 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    I am so happy I stumbled on your channel! After seeing a minute of this video--I subscribed immediately. Thank you for the well produced content.

    • @bigscientificquestions
      @bigscientificquestions  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thank you so much! I'm glad you enjoyed it. 😊

    • @ReligionAndMaterialismDebunked
      @ReligionAndMaterialismDebunked 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      O.o I researched more into Charles Darwin not being a material atheist again. It's one of the top 10 myths of Darwin, that he was a material atheist, according to even Oxford, and according to a site dedicated to him. He said he rejected religion, especially Christianity, for how brutal it was, but found life to be too incredible to be made by chance, and that science is very limited in regards to how the universe was made, and how it really works.
      Richard Dawkins, while a "Cultural Christian", actually singing Jesus songs, and such, says evolution is incompatible with any deity. However, his entire life's work is based on Darwin, and Darwin said the opposite of what he said. Besides, creationism isn't the only way for life to exist by any deity.
      A lot of material atheists have this debunked myth that some lady spread (according to Oxford, and several sources) about Darwin being an atheist.
      Richard Dawkins is arguably the face of atheism, and while an amazing writer, and very smart in biology, he doesn't even know what Darwin felt about life. Plus, he's been criticized at being a horrible philosopher by several philosophers, and others. The God Delusion many loved, but it was very very basic philosophy.
      Of course, material atheism dogma rejects anything spiritual, and unless the person is very open-minded, or has a near-death experience, or out-of-body experience, then more often than not they'll not even analyze data, nor fund anything that suggest anything other than materialism.
      As well, over 20% of so-called material atheists are spiritual, but they had to poll anonymously due to mockery, and possible career loss, which are common feats of strong materialists, unfortunately so, but not surprisingly so.
      One of the leaders of NDE studies, Dr. Pin van Lommer, was a hardcore materialist, and laughed at NDEs. He, as a cardiologist, realised how much went on without a cortex to run the brain. He switched over to believing into non-materialism.
      Peter Fenwick is a neuropsychiatrist and neuropsychologist who changed his mind on materialism, and has tons of data of NDEs showing how life isn't solely material.
      Dr. Bruce Greyson was raised a materialist, and couldn't help but find patients who were not supposed to be conscious at all, who he even didn't meet yet, describe several real-time events that were fully verified. He did a lot of studies into NDEs, and found out many doctors, nurses, and even the head of the hospital he was at were spiritual, but fake being materialists because of how toxic materialism dogma gets. He has studied NDEs for over 45 years.
      Dr. Even Alexander was a neurosurgeon, which aren't too common, and used to laugh hard at the idea of NDEs being real. He was a very saddened man before his NDE, he said, and his loved ones said. His coma from a very rare virus that almost always kills people, had him out-of-body, and verifying things in real-time, along with finding out about a loved one he never knew of, that he confirmed later (happens often in NDEs). Some tried to debunk him, and his refutes debunk the fake skeptics who claim, with a cop-out, that he's just trying to sell books (even though he's wealthy, and most people who have an NDE don't write books lol). His documentation is at that hospital. Several medical doctors have adored him for his bravery.
      There are cases where technology of today has picked up paranormal activity, that's been reviewed by experts in science, video editing, and so forth, as confirmed true.
      A lot of nonsense exists within the small group of materialists. Most atheists are spiritual, like Buddhists, some Hindu sects, some other faiths, & many atheists consider themselves agnostic-atheists, as Dawkins himself even says he's a 9 out of a 10 for being an atheist.
      Very interesting stuff, especially with quantum mechanics debunking a solely material life.
      Simulation theory is believed by over 50% of scientists (even atheist, DeGrasse Tyson, immediately asked if any creator exists when he heard the breaking news of simulation theory at a science convention).
      Donald Hoffman being a former materialist, that now believes in a conscious-based reality. He believes in a holographic universe, and that we're in avatars. The math keeps adding up to that despite his usual views of materialism. He's well-loved in the science community, though plenty of course reject him, obviously. They reject him because old scientists often times hate new science because it is against materialism, steps on their work (like the James Webb Satellite Telescope debunking the big bang theory recently that many scientists got butthurt over), and a lot of outdated science books exists in so-called schools, they say.
      Tom Campbell (is pro-vegan) was a materialist, alongside a scientist friend, before reading work of Robert Monroe, a pioneer on out-of-body experiences, remote viewing, etc. They helped Monroe build a lab, & a school. The CIA studied there for over 20 years.
      Etc.

  • @oszb
    @oszb 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    His thought is slow, but always kind; He holds us all within his mind.

    • @_cul8r_
      @_cul8r_ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Where did I hear that before? Something about a bear and a turtle? The world on his back….?

  • @itscalm123
    @itscalm123 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    this is so much fun bro. now i know why i exist as a human at this moment in time and space. just to discover more of myself

  • @user-up8jx3mt6j
    @user-up8jx3mt6j 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    A fabulous journey of wonderment.
    I came across a comment down below that may be the most profound. This whole exploration, integrating all these facets and questions yet and still only attempt at questioning and/or understanding 'potentially' the probable
    even tiniest of brush-strokes upon this mammoth impossible to view, by way of even the most infinitesimal scratch of 'color' - canvas. Distilling that over two hours of 'exercise' down into perhaps the most fundamental question of all into a single word; that being 'why'. Excellent.
    Absolutely fabulous video, Thanks.

  • @Badkitty17
    @Badkitty17 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    Oh cool I’ve thought about this before , maybe our combined minds make up the universe and what happens in it ,, if we all start thinking happiness and peace it’ll come to be :)-

    • @user-wg8jt9fc1i
      @user-wg8jt9fc1i 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      This is correct

    • @buymogate
      @buymogate 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Most certainly👍

    • @claudedolorossa5607
      @claudedolorossa5607 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Nothing comes from nothing and nothing becomes nothing. Consciouness could be what the universe is harvesting, when organic life dies. I believe its in buddhism that the soul is descibed as a waterdrop falling towards the ocean - once it reaches the ocean, it stops excisting as an individual phenomena, , but doesnt disappear in its parts.

    • @jaylucas8352
      @jaylucas8352 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes. I command you to be happy and peaceful

    • @chrisdaldy-rowe4978
      @chrisdaldy-rowe4978 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@claudedolorossa5607 When a water drop hits the ocean it creates waves& in the center of those waves pops up one little round drop.Maybe it popped back up to see what happened? lol

  • @PaperPlateClorox
    @PaperPlateClorox 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you for doing this. This is wonderful. 🙏

  • @Draakie100
    @Draakie100 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Penrose (Nobel Prize) and Hameroff are doing some really interesting experiments in this field. (Microtubules). Thank you for this amazing upload, and I wish everybody a healthy, happy, and mind~*~bending life 🌎☮

  • @Drusiah1
    @Drusiah1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    This is so crazy. I have, for a long time now, questioned and thought of the idea that we could potentially just be neurons and synopsis of this massive 4th dimensional being or just being of some sort. Somehow, this is the first time I’ve seen something about this idea/thought.

    • @ashleyobrien4937
      @ashleyobrien4937 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      not a new idea or even a likely one, sort of like many people seeing a smile on a dog....don't give it too much thought...

    • @jessewgrine2097
      @jessewgrine2097 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      There is still a dog there tho

    • @jaylucas8352
      @jaylucas8352 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Strip away the bio organic material and we are basicaly a neural net recipient and transmitting data on myethelial cells in an electrical pattern….we are our own simulation , reacting to stimuli

    • @Philemaphobia
      @Philemaphobia 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You and me now. Whenever someone asks for my religion this is what I tell them. NOW I can cite Schrödinger. I was totally thinking I came up with this ‚on my own‘ or better said: That I discovered the information somewhere in my mind.

    • @manuelalcala2309
      @manuelalcala2309 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I thought about that in the 1st grade when I learned about white blood cells and red blood cells

  • @peterbroderson6080
    @peterbroderson6080 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The moment a particle is a wave; it has to be a conscious wave!
    Nicola Tesla states, “If you want to find the secrets of the universe,
    think in terms of energy, frequency, and vibration”
    Gravity is the conscious attraction among waves to create the illusion of particles,
    and creates our experience-able Universe.
    Max Planck states: "Consciousness is fundamental and matter is derived from Consciousness".
    Life is the Infinite Consciousness, experiencing the Infinite Possibilities, Infinitely.
    We are "It", experiencing our infinite possibilities in our finite moment.
    Our job is to make it interesting!

  • @mikemarable4098
    @mikemarable4098 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ON CONSCIOUSNESS...
    We swim in an ocean of consciousness and our “equipment” utilizes it as its animating force within the limitations of the mechanism. Humans are built differently than an amoeba so we utilize consciousness differently as a result. Some humans alter their ability to utilize more consciousness or have slightly different equipment to begin with. Others have deficits in the design or have damage and therefore limitations in how consciousness is being used. It is a neutral force and can be manipulated to suit the circumstances. We establish a template built upon expectations and create a default construction that can become our sense of self. This persists even after we die for awhile but eventually we drop it. -Mike Marable, Author of How To Have Good Life After You’re Dead

  • @RyskerSein
    @RyskerSein 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    My one thing is that.. we need to take into consideration that time is experienced differently given the size. What feels like a couple of hours to us, is not a couple of hours to say, a dog or cat, or even smaller things like insects. So if the universe is sending signals to itself what would be billion of years to us could possibly not feel like billions of years to the universe or anything that so much more massive than we can imagine.

    • @CommackMark
      @CommackMark 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Imagine a being that could balance a galaxy on its finger tip. Given galaxies are of an order of about 100,000 light years this being would at arms length require about 1 million years to be able to see the galaxy at its finger tip....for the light to travel that distance. A million years to perceive something an arms length away? That makes mo sense. So while time is relative ..... your hour could be a billion years based on relative velocities.... time dialation if Relativity .... but the perception of time passage always remains constant.... no matter what 5 seconds always feels like 5 seconds..... but maybe this isn't true.

    • @carsonlove531
      @carsonlove531 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But if a being was billions of times the size of our universe, think how long a signal would take to travel just across a single neural synapse! Assuming it has a remotely similar physiological structure to our brain, that would mean an impulse from the finger to the brain would require longer than our universe has existed just to be transmitted.
      There are a lot of assumptions being made here, but in the context of the comment about a being balancing our universe on its finger tip, i feel like assumptions are part and parcel

    • @carsonlove531
      @carsonlove531 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh you said galaxy, not universe. Well similar point but not nearly the same scale

  • @EkamNoor
    @EkamNoor 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This video would have garnered 100 times more views if it had been produced by 'History of the Universe'.

  • @augustocastillo8895
    @augustocastillo8895 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    With so many particles created when an atom is split, wouldn’t be amazing that every particle is an universe like ours?

    • @JJ-ls8jo
      @JJ-ls8jo 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Holographic Simulated Universe

  • @Pterelaos1
    @Pterelaos1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    " The All is Mind . The Universe is Mental". This is an ancient Greek Gnostic principle and in fact the first Hermetic principle presented in the Hermetic Emerald Tablet , which is the prelude in Corpus Hermeticum index of gnostik texts.

  • @Dr.Zuess.
    @Dr.Zuess. 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    What if multiple personalities are incidents of ppl experiencing multiple consciousnesses 😮??

  • @carenkurdjinian5413
    @carenkurdjinian5413 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    This is sooooo interesting…..The Universe Breaths and Talks …..🌞