Hope you guys liked the video! I love using YouGov to make easy cash! Click my link: www.inflcr.co/SHF9S #YouGovPartner Pinal County Sheriff's Office: facebook.com/PinalCountySO/ Submit your video: forms.gle/CUpEtoKF4cw7apur6 Merch: crowdmade.com/collections/lackluster - Other Channels - The Odd Side: th-cam.com/channels/TSdgjy509mgNBfAa4MQ3gw.html Lady LackLuster: th-cam.com/channels/tj-_HlsiOHIZpdjIWsFi_w.html
Hello mate I hope you're well! I was wondering if you've seen Annapolis Audit being attacked at a polling station? The States Attorney is refusing to press charges! He could really use the help from you about now! Much respect 🙏
That A_hole cop represents MAJORITY law breaking "officers" who turned into new Slave Masters under color of law and Qualified IMPUNITY, backed up by government attorneys, judges "Injustice System" God FLUSH America😆😂🤣
@@fortyyearfitness that might have been what was said during the "missing footage" and he was told to tear up the ticket he wrote and not turn it in to the courts.
*Did you hear him at the end? He WANTS it to go to court?* *Is there a donation link? Or does the driver need representation?* *I WANT it to go to court, ALSO.*
@osteenjoseph I suspect that your question was rhetorical, but it's because they're ENFORCERS for the wealthy and politically connected (those who create laws and their donors). The enforcers' bosses care more about the number of boots on the ground keeping us in line than they care about their enforcers' ability to testify in court. It's one of the reasons that we're told to fight it out in court rather than by the roadside. If we all started fighting back in the streets when they fail to uphold their end of the social contract, the enforcers would be overwhelmed and their bosses would lose control. If that happened, the gov would fear the people in lieu of the people fearing the gov.
The Supreme Court has previously ruled that an officer requesting a driver's license at a traffic stop is not considered a search or seizure (Kansas v. Glover). Also, it is in fact Arizona law that a driver must present their license and registration when requested at a traffic stop, regardless of the reason behind the stop, and failure to do so is a Class II Misdemeanor (A.R.S. 28-1595(B)). Or you know, just don't do 71 in a 45.
What is considered a traffic stop in AZ? Just the activity of being pulled over? Does AZ law require identification “just because” at anytime whenever behind the steering wheel? My municipal police idents themselves and reason for stop before asking for identification. Supposedly, they do that for officer safety. On the odd occasion the driver just murdered someone an hour earlier, it saves the officer from being shot if they just disclose the reason for the stop as a (simple) traffic violation.
If you're going to try cite law.... cite it correctly. Words matter. Arizona law requires a driver to "DISPLAY", not "present", not "hand over", etc. This officer who, "does this for a living" insists a person "GIVE ME" their driver's license, which is not a lawful command. He also instructs them to "not say another word", again a clear violation of the 1st Amendment and a "command" that is no where in his authority to issue. 28-3169. Possession and display of driver license; defense A. A licensee shall have a legible driver license in the licensee's immediate possession at all times when operating a motor vehicle. On demand of a justice of the peace, a police officer or a field deputy or inspector of the department, a licensee shall DISPLAY the license.
@@CVSoprano I think you might consider this is a TV production and the consequences of the type of escalation you are talking about. He would love to escalate but that wouldn't play well on TV.
He's on the Brady-Giglio List A Giglio or Brady list is a list compiled usually by a prosecutor's office or a police department containing the names and details of law enforcement officers who have had sustained incidents of untruthfulness, criminal convictions, candor issues, or some other type of issue placing their credibility into question.
Cop "if you don't give me your ID I'm going to drag you out of the car and take you to jail" Two mins later same Cop "there was no reason to be confrontational like that" Proof that just because you're conscious doesn't mean your self-aware
@@hobbz7126 that doesn't prevent the cop from illegal detainment and unlawful search and seizure. Knowing why you are pulled over is literally needed in order to know if you need to comply. Or are you saying we should give up our 4th amendment before verification of a crime being suspected?
@@thatoneguyishere1662 It appears you're basing your comment on feelings and not facts. If you were to look at Arizona law, you would realize that cops are not required to provide the reason for a traffic stop. However, the law does require you to provide ID when asked during a traffic stop. It sure seems awfully arrogant to think you can tell police how to do their job when you don't even know the basic law.
@@hobbz7126 the law doesn't prevent them from telling us and the 4th amendment overrides everything you just said. The 4th amendment provides protection in the form of consent. By your logic the cops can just start shooting you legally and not tell you why until you're dead. Shut up
The most asshole comment was when the officer wanted the registration, the driver asked if he was allowed to reach it in the glove box and the officer answered with "unless it's going to magically appear in your hands". Considering how often innocent people got shot because "they were reaching for something and i thought it was a gun" that is a perfectly reasonable question.
Yep. I live on the border of TN and GA. At the time when I was 16 GA you had to provide proof of insurance and TN you didn’t. I got pulled over in TN and was instinctively reaching to get my Insurance from glovebox and heard “DONT BE STUPID DONT BE FUKING STUPID” and turned around to see the most scared old cop shaking as pointing his gun at my head. I truly didn’t understand what was happening. I always ask now. I’ve often wondered how close I was to dying that day. The cop didn’t even give me a ticket he was shaking non stop and let me go.
I never keep my registration or insurance card in a compartment, always on the visor so cops don’t get a look in that compartment. Remember people, plain view doctrine. Also, always print out a copy of your insurance so you don’t have to stop recording to retrieve it.
I do the same but only because I don’t want them to shoot my black ass. And this cop has such a disdain for how we treat them well we have hate for you Pigs
Over here (UK) we're advised to not carry our drivers licence or insurance cover note (rare to get a paper one these days). The police give you a "producer" to attend a police station with them
Yep, they edit these videos to make him seem like he has a sense of humor and he’s a real sweetheart, this is the way all cops are, this DIRTY COP believes he can do whatever he wants and he’ll lie doing it.
@@x548621793get the deleted footage and you'll know. Also, that car was keeping up with the pace of traffic around, no way they were doing 26 mph faster than the other cars.
This A_hole cop represents MAJORITY law breaking "officers" who turned into new Slave Masters under color of law and Qualified IMPUNITY, backed up by government attorneys, judges "Injustice System" God FLUSH America😆😂🤣
And that is why no one respects or is afraid of cops anymore. Think of the millions of rights violations that went on unchecked for decades before TH-cam and dash cams
@@eviedechant If it was on the up and up, why didn't the cop show up for court? He said he was hoping the guy would take it to court so he could have another conversation with him. Just saying. Odd that most of the video was gone.
This officer use to be a Maricops county deputy. He quite prior to an investigation into him violating policy, and a theft accusation against him. He has a distain for the public in general.
It should be a law that if a cop interrupts your freedom by pulling you over, he must tell you the reason immediately. Not give them time to make something up.
Police: "can I see your ID" Driver: "may I ask what crime I've committed?" Police: "Well I need to see your ID first" Driver: "What crime have I committed though why did you pull me over?" Police: "That's what I'm trying to figure out that's why I need to see your ID" Driver: "well if I didn't commit a crime I don't need to ID" Police: "well if you don't provide your ID I'm going to pull you out of your car and arrest you" Driver: "arrest me? for what crime?" Police: "I'm trying to figure that out that's why I need to see your ID"
Watch Sloup's face as the window gets about a inch from the top. It's a picture as he says "your winding the window up" then the deafening silence. Brilliant!
Cops: We want people to ask before reaching for anything Also cops: "Unless it's gonna magically appear in your hands you have to reach into your glovebox" "You don't have to put your seatbelt on, we aren't going anywhere" whilst activately going somewhere. Perfect example the majority of cops personalities
I asked a cop once, to reach for my license, he said you don't have to ask. I said yeah just in case your jumpy and decide to pull a gun and ruin a bunch of lives, he told me I didn't have a clue what I'm talking about. Then he saw my LEO badge. Lol fucking ginger
The coproach was the condescending prick, not the driver. The driver is correct, what good is "our" 4th amendment if we have to identify before "We, the people" find out if it's even a lawful stop? FTP that expect ID first, because we've all seen the videos where many times it's NOT a lawful stop and the roid/road pirate is on a fishing expedition.
Damn Sloup is a yankee as well his side kick Valentino for CGPD they all have a big ego to fill. Well good to know he is on the Brady’s list, guess he is a dirty Deputy.
I went to school with this guy. I remember him getting picked on quite a bit for being a smarta$$ and little punk. I am glad to see he found a job where he can now feel like a man.
The criteria for pursing a career in law enforcement is that a person is either a pusillanimous ass or a bully. In either case, they use the position of power to compensate for their personal failures.
Qualified immunity is NOT the problem! The problem is that it is so blatantly and shamelessly abused by criminals with badges (AND THEIR SUPERVISORS) … and as a result, must be abolished!
Even with documented evidence of the radar, there are reasons why they come up wrong. There were other cars on the road. Nobody knows which one he was actually picking up. And unless he has valid documentation from the last time it was calibrated, he may as well leave it at the station.
@@7heRedBaron That was laser, not radar. The laser is less than 3ft wide at 1000ft which is the appx distance shown on the gun when he showed it to the camera. How wide is a standard car? Tell me you don't know what you're talking about without telling me you don't know what you're talking about.
-Of course the cop is upset when the script is not followed. -Then TV-cop describes his own behavior, not that of the driver. -No seatbelts means TV cop can leap out of his squad car like he was Magnum PI.
"I have such a disdain for people like him......that condescending arrogant tone" Congratulations deputy you just described yourself to a T What a fool
Absolutely! The classic “You spot it, you got it.” I think He somehow thinks he will come off as… clever? Or big? Doesn’t realize what a d-bag he comes across as.
This officer should be fired hes sarcastic and escalates situations and this proves hw corrupt this officer is but when trump gets in office he's going to give all law enforcement federal immunity / amnesty from prosecution check it out it all over the web
This deputy reminded me of a phrase that was taught to me as a young man. Son you can learn a lot more by listening, than you can by talking. Well that and, the irony of His disdain for arrogance.
This LEO has serious issues - he thinks he is Chicago PD. His TV persona has gone to his head. He is a timebomb waiting to explode. Pinal County AZ is opening themselves up for serious liability.
HAHAHAHAHA, now dats funny he wouldn't last very long with that attitude in Chicago, or Washington DC 🤣 😆 😂, 1st other officer wouldn't wanna be partnered with him.
This cop is arrogant and thinks he is the greatest thing since sliced bread. He is a danger to the public and doesn't belong on the road carrying a badge and gun. Unstable cops seem to always find ways to get hired. This clown in uniform is all talk and no action.
@@AntiPlatitudesoon will be in most states because of arrogant cops like him. What’s the harm in saying why you stopped me? Besides an ego? If I’m speeding just tell me I’m speeding. We’re both adults.
@@dariuswhite2148 oh, I agree. He should, in my opinion, tell the driver why he or she has been stopped. Maybe there’s some good reason(s) that they do not do it. I’ve seen quite a bit of footage of this deputy, and it seems like his reason for not doing it is almost purely to establish his authority and/or dominance.
@@davidhowell1415 truth. That's why I read a book every day. Nothing else to do worth doing. I actually miss being able to read that much, just not in that setting.
That A_hole cop represents MAJORITY law breaking "officers" who turned into new Slave Masters under color of law and Qualified IMPUNITY, backed up by government attorneys, judges "Injustice System" God FLUSH America😆😂🤣
"I hope I see him again so we can have a cordial conversation again." No shows the court date. There had to be something said in the edited out footage that he was reprimanded for. Gotta be the reason why he didn't show.
ALSO, front and rear with microphone. I have both, the State Patrol pulled me over late at night. The first words out of his mouth was i see you have dashcams front and back.. I said yes I do... I was supposedly going 54 in a 50. He stated to me that he did not actually use radar or lazer. He said they had a camera set up. Also, he said he was using the BMW that had already passed me to determine my speed. I asked him why he did not pull over the BMW. He did not respond.
@@Cooldaddio2 You're missing the fact that the officer can file a subpoena for that same dash cam footage to prove you were in fact speeding. And he can do that right on the side of the road and seize your dash cam. Having a dash cam is a double edged sword. While it may prove you weren't speeding in one case, it can prove you were in another.
Umm well, “he started his phone like I was going to do something wrong.” Actually it seems like he knew perfectly just exactly what sort of criminal activity you were about to perpetrate and then he recorded it.
Nice unmarked cars too. Ahole cops in unmarked cars, starring in their own propaganda shows, while sitting in their fancy cars chatting and making bank+pension to do it. Such a "hard job". He needs at least 3 spinoff series, and a statue, plus a butt warmer in his car. And there weren't nearly enough lanes shut down, or cops sitting there doing nothing, lets just go ahead and close down the entire highway and fill it with cops so they can hang out and chat with their buddies about how great they are.
But Deputy sloup did nothing wrong here haha everything said was straight to the point and constitutional and followed state law. Deputy Sloup answered any and all questions that retained to the stop.
Wait did dude record himself going 26 over the speed limit?? That's the only criminal activity that was in the video. Or am I wrong? Even in the video all the laws the officer followed were stated in the video. Did u only watch the parts u wanted to watch?
As someone who lives in this county…the cops will ride your ass and fly around you and flip you off if you aren’t going fast enough for them. They pull people over on hunt hwy acting like it’s crazy they are going 60 mph in a 45 but EVERYONE goes 60 plus on that road. And the cops go even faster. You see the cops all over the roads, they are literally everywhere.
Not providing ID may well be a secondary charge. The primary offence was speeding and i don't think he needs to wait for a conviction before then charging you with refusing to ID.
@@chrisestridge3030 🤦🏻♂️ not situational awareness….SELF AWARENESS. The cop is acting as petty and as condescending as possible just to tell his camera man how much he hates condescending people. 🤣 What you just implied is that it’s ok for the officer to act like a hypocrite because other officers were on the scene 🤣. I’m starting to question YOUR self awareness now🤣
In Maryland the few times I’ve been pulled over they asked me if I knew why I was pulled over. Never answer this question. There is no correct answer to what do you think you were doing illegal. If I have the nerve someday, I will say it’s because of the large shark fin on the roof of my car. Lacking such, I would expect him to say You don’t have one. To which I would ask, so I’m free to go?
This cop is corrupt and sarcastic to citizens and the disdainment he has towards citizens is very obvious but his leadership will defend his disdainment and sarcasm towards citizens
The eye roll, blow me the cop knows why the citizen asked to reach into the glove box, because if he didn’t the cop might “fear for his life” and pull his service pistol.
Translation: "I have such a disdain for people who don't mindlessly obey whatever I tell them to do instantly and without any question, even when it's a violation of their rights." Fixed it for him. Though we would also have accepted "I have such a disdain for people" as a complete and accurate statement.
It’s hilarious how the officer expresses his opinion on the man in the vehicle when he gets back into his car, but everything that the officer says about the guy, he was doing.
"Unless it's going to magically appear in your hands, you kind of have to, right?" Had he just reached without asking, he might have been shot! Keep your sarcasm to yourself, officer
Unreal...the cop had to make a snotty remark when the guy nicely told him, he was going to open his glove compartment. If someone just went to go reach for it..and the cop doesn't have his head on for whatever reason....he could have gotten killed. I've watched videos where this has happened.
I've had a cop pull a gun on me for retrieving my information from my glovebox as he requested, even told him I was reaching for the requested documents.was years ago and back them I was ignorant and uninformed.
Must be nice that someone has the time to do all this editing of someone being foolish. The driver was speeding and the officer has the right to demand proof of identity, registration, and insurance as a violation was observed. This is dictated under the privilege of driving and explained when applying for a drivers license.
Driving is the act of transport for hire or monetary gain. Traveling, which is a right NOT a privilege is different. And The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on this in multiple cases.
@@crooked-halo, there are people inaccurately citing the facts of being a sovereign citizen, but sovereignty and the rights that go with that are inherent, and no person or body has the right to negate nor diminish those inherent rights. Regardless of what "law" is passed. If a law violates ANY Constitutionally protected rights, and they're protected due to the very nature that our rights are bestowed upon at and by birth, then that law is null and void. The biggest violation of laws that attempt to turn rights into privileges violates The Thirteenth Amendment. People need to read, learn amd understand that NO BODY, GOVERNMENT or OTHERWISE has the right to rule dominion over another...PERIOD!
The Pinal county sheriffs office has the time to do all this editing of Frank (sometimes) being foolish. The driver was accused of speeding, it was not proven in a court of law, in America we don't convict people on the side of the road. Frank said it was a Chrysler clear as day and we know super Frank does this for a living all day long, he tells everyone that on every stop. How could such a super cop get the make of the car wrong? Does he not know a Chrysler from a fancy new Hyundai? Seems dubious, or Frank isn't as great as he says he is. But, he got him on laser at 1000 yards! Wow, what a super duper cop but I wonder if the operations manual recommends using the device at nearly 1/5th of a mile away? Sorry, CASE DISMISSED. Frank's own arrogance created serious reasonable doubt in this case. No matter what traffic law you quote the Constitution and the 4th amendment cannot be infringed. So, stop licking boots and expect government agents to be professional and follow the law.
Did anyone else notice that the car that pinged his radar/laser was the dark colored Chrysler, which was confirmed by his stating “Chrysler” when getting into his vehicle, but the car he pulled over was a lighter colored Genesis.
Well he could’ve just gotten the model wrong but yes he does say dark color Chrysler and then pulls over a light color Hyundai Genesis so that is pretty fucking funny. Maybe that’s what the edit is for?
The Genesis was at the top of the hill and was the car he was tagging, the cameraman was just very bad at his job. By the time you hear the solid tone, the black Cadillac was much closer than 1076ft. The Genesis does look darker as it crest the hill but that's just the reflection of the sky combined with the awful cameraman. He even says, "that one right there" right as the Genesis passes him. The cop is still a punk bitch but he got the right car.
Remember that quote from the movie "the departed" where leo decaprio says "there's no one more full-of-shit than a cop that knows hes on camera" truth.
So with the whole ticket not being in court is because they are useing and thing where they put in the computer and it automatically sends it to the court but there was a glitch in the system. And second the reason why deaputy sloup got mad is because nate was telling him how to do his job, and nate was in the wrong. By a long shot. And also he send this up to the sheriff and also judge and he said nothing was wrong here and no policy's were broken. So if we are going off on hurt feelings because he got mad because someone trying to be a smart ass with him then yall need to put you big boy pants on and go see the world
I can just imagine if he acts like this in front of the camera how he acts without it or honestly how he acts knowing the cameraman will delete any footage he wants.
When commercial video production techniques collide with government requirements. I worked in broadcasting at the turn of the century. Footage was commonly recorded over or deleted to simplify storage and make a finished product quicker. Also, it helped to reduce the editing error rate.
Lackluster is a hypocrite of epic proportions. Are you aware of what Lackluster did? If you did, then you'd know that his posting of videos is just outrageous. He has zero credibility.
You have been added to the do not respond list for all Police Agencies. You're on your own. Now....your wife beater shirt is not a good look. Take note.
Did we watch the same video. He was cool when he walked up. The driver opened up like a condescending jerk. He was driving not just walking down the street
@@dexter726 but he doesn't need to.. come on I love these audit guys a lot of them expose some serious abuse. But this guy is an amateur pretending . That's the real problem he is making the rest look bad. Cop was snippy but the dude was also arrogant. He claimed he knew the law but he didn't.
Awesome stuff. As an unhoused, unsheltered homeless person (since May) I've been recording the unbelievable LEO contacts I've had and posting them to My own channel for the very reasons you've highlighted. I used to think most of these type of TH-cam vids were an exaggeration or deliberately manipulated thru editing to make LEOs seem less noble & credible. My own unfortunate circumstances+ personal experiences have opened my Eyes. Anytime and Everytime I have contact with someone of Authority I hit the record button. It's truly the biggest equalizer We citizens have ever been handed since the Gutenberg Press. Keep up the Good Word brother and Cheers from Portland 🦞⚓👍
Remember, the church was really upset with Guttenberg for printing bibles. They wanted only priests to give you interpretations or opinions on what was actually written. Cops don't like cameras for similar reasons, they don't want anyone else to know how they butcher the law and how badly they treat the people who pay their salary. Abolish qualified immunity.
I hope you get past troubled times in good speed! I was lucky, I had experiences ranging from mildly unpleasant to awful, life-threatening starting as a teenager. I have not needed the slow awakening that many Americans are going through now.
Over the last few years the police departments here in Arizona have become increasingly tyrannical. I have noticed since installing a multi camera dash cam the pull up with thir lights on then notice the camera is recording and all of a sudden they either shut them off and go on their way or pretend they were after someone else only to go up the road a ways and shut them off
Yeah I have a camera that goes out the back out the front end on the inside and then I have another camera if I get pulled over that shoots out the driver's door and one that shoots out the passenger Door
COPs that do not file their tickets nor show up in court when they should - should be tracked and held in CONTEMPT of COURT if this is a regular occurrence...
Actually you need to be thankful that the officer might not show up, so that if people want to contest a particularly pesky ticket, the officer might be a no-show, and that the ticket is dismissed. In Tampa Florida they issued a policy that every officer has to show up for any ticket they write, even if it is on their day off and so forth, and this makes challenging a ticket much more of a chore. If you think an officer is unreasonable, then imagine how much more reasonable they are when dragged into court on their day off, or when they have to appear at night after a day shift.
@@Menstral them being unreasonable in front of a judge works in your favor if the ticket was unjust to begin with. And if it was just, why are you contesting it?
@@Menstral Of course, if he doesn't have to show up, he is free to write harassing tickets just to inconvenience drivers they don't like. The driver is forced to take a day off of work and possible drive to some city where de does not live to defend himself from bullshit accusations. Then the cop doesn't have to show up and doesn't have to justify why he wrote the ticket.
Cop simply doing his job and speeding jerkoff giving an attitude for doing so isn’t right. Maybe you should look up the meaning or the word condescending in the dictionary before you show your clear ignorance buddy. 😂😂😂
If I'm driving and pulled over, I hand my license and insurance right away I don't get why people resist that when they're driving If you're walking around and recording video, that's a different story
@djimiwreybigsby5263 when you actually made a mistake and did something wrong, complying is the only reasonable action. However, if you're not aware, law-abiding citizens are abused every single day by officers. A traffic stop could be a fishing expedition, a fake "matching description" can lead to false arrest, or a call for help could lead to getting shot in the face. With some LE training, I can tell you with certainty that officers get trained to be manipulatively "nice." You think you're being civil and reasonable by complying without question, but the fact is many officers rely on naivety and ignorance for people to dehumanize themselves by alienating their own civil rights. Bottom line, we're all accountable for our actions; and the public should be particularly interested in demanding integrity and accountability from gun-wielding enforcers that are trained to manipulate and physically dominate.
“Your required to produce your proof of insurance in a timely manner” Remember that when they pull you over and they want to take 20 mins writing you a ticket when they’re trying to give their buddy with the K9 extra time to make it to your location. This tool clearly thinks he’s some sort of TV star.
@@PhillipReid28absolutely not. Timley manner is for the civilian and it applies to ALL stops. They legally can't extend the stop more than required. People beat serious charges every single day because of this.
Some cop- "I really hope this goes to court. I hope with every fiber of my being that I get to go and see him again." Also some cop- *Doesn't show up for court* 😂🤣😂🤣
Seriously the fact he deleted the part where he was talking about his evidence and it's accuracy and started by saying how he lined up the laser on him and followed him exactly and then didn't show up for court makes me think he was just doing a traffic stop for the show probably not intending to give a ticket until the driver didn't cower in his presence and beg for forgiveness so he lost his cool but after the fact he prolly realized he gave himself away at the part he cut out and was afraid a judge would make him show or explain what was missing. Truly amazing how you can tell his really believes himself when saying the driver was condescending and rude first when clearly his response to the driver asking what he pulled him over for was clearly the first condescending and abrasive statement made
@@fransmith8992: So say you. What's the name of this 'fucking reality tv show' and in which episode can we view this in its entirety? I'll wait, despite my gut feeling doing so will prove a complete waste of time. I can already tell you are a disingenuous person because you lack the integrity to actually spell out what you're intending to message. As you can see, that does not apply to me.
The type of pompous poser that Frank is dealing with of course is driving a Genesis SUV and is certain in his mind that it's just as good as a Porsche or Bentley and should be given special treatment. This is the same type of guy who thinks getting a cubic zirconia ring for his lady is just as good as a diamond and everyone else is just stupid for spending more. There's nothing worse than a cheapskate know it all, he's lucky his Hyundai didn't blow up for doing more than 70 mph
He realized that he was recorded being an arrogant prick and didn't want to give this stop viral video legs, so he conveniently tossed the ticket, hoping it would all just magically go away. Unfortunately for officer dickface, he's on his way to becoming famous for his arrogant attitude anyway.
@@gregogrady8027 Except the pig _DID_ know how the 4th Amendment applies to a traffic stop. It was the driver that screwed it up. The cop was an asshole...but he was right and the driver was wrong. When pulled over for a traffic infraction in Arizona (I'm pretty sure all states, but definitely in Arizona), drivers are required by law to display their valid driver's license upon demand of a cop, and failure / refusal to do so is a class 2 misdemeanor. The 4th Amendment in no way prevents swine from demanding a driver's license during a traffic stop, even without telling the driver the reason for the stop. Way too many auditors and "rights defenders" _think_ they know and understand the law, but they actually get simple things like this absolutely wrong. A traffic stop is absolutely not the same as a cop approaching you on the street, whether you or the driver in this video like or understand that. The pig was still an asshole, and he's clearly a useless piece of shit, since he couldn't even be bothered to file the damned ticket. But him being a piece of shit doesn't make his understanding of the law in this specific scenario incorrect.
I dont think the guy understands how the "Stop and identify thing works" hes right that he cant be stopped just to be identified, unles hes being accused of committing a crime which he 100% was being accused beacuse he did.
Absolutely, and the exact reason the cop should have done his job, told the guy I'm stopping you for speeding and the guy would have happily handed over the license. It was an obvious overt challenge to Frank's masculinity and his ego took over. Is it really his job to threaten violence over a speeding ticket when it's really his ego we're talking about. Listen, the guy was a dick but let's be honest... you really want to live in a country that cops have no limits? Me either and the Constitution doesn't say you have to be nice about standing up for your rights and in fact they apply to all citizens. Problem here with the pissed off commenters pissed off about the comments pissing every one off is that they miss the point. You don't have to like people but they still have rights just like you.
@@mnn1265bro what r you even talking about? When did he broke the guys rights? 🤣 speedster was being a dick so don’t expect others to be nice to him even cops. He’s doing traffic stops not customer service. If you’re an asshole to a cop, the cop doesn’t have to be nice back. Could argue is not as professional but not illegal or unethical
You are 1000% right about how these agencies PRODUCE their videos to fit a stated NARRATIVE. Instead of the video speaking for itself. I always thought agencies were especially corrupt and shady how they would arrest someone, then later change charges after the fact once video gets seen by unbiased eyes. You arrest someone, either they did something,, or they didn't!...Not arrest, THEN "see how it looks, or feels" to fit your explanation
If they blur edact anything other than private information, you need to sue them for making you pay for footage you can not use. Or at least demand a refund.
You mean sue you right? "They" don't pay anything, they get paid. We pay them, pay for the cameras, pay for the equipment ( realizing this situation is slightly abnormal in the fact that the cameraman could be a private party and the footage not necessarily public) And we pay them to delete our own evidence or blur the transparency of the record. The officer notes, correctly so, that there is no law requiring he identify his cause. There is case law supporting the constitutional requirement that a person arrested be informed they are under arrest and the nature of the charges against them. However that case law also allows nothing relating a traffic stop to an arrest, the information is only suggested when possible and practical while the informing of cause or charges is really only for the in court. This is a bit off topic specifically but I believe is a broader perspective that addresses these issues. The fourth amendment reads, The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. The phrasing leaves no doubt that a reasonable search or seizure is possible and the people would have no right to be free from violation under such "reasonable cause". However there is no period rather a comma indicating that what defines "reasonable" is being addressed. Reasonable would according to a literal reading be defined by a court either finding probable cause and issuing a warrant or not finding cause and denying authority under color of law. What has been sold to us over a century of time is to ignore this plain text understanding that only a court has the jurisdiction to find probable cause and issue a warrant. This can hardly be argued as anything but an intentional separation of the powers between the executive/ law enforcement branch and the judicial branch. A check on the abuse of the authority law enforcement has under the law that might be abused if the law is incorrectly interpreted or applied. As noted by the narrator, cops usually have probable cause of a traffic violation, they actually witnessed the infraction. Under the law, an officer is limited in his arrest powers to when he personally witnesses a misdemeanor or has a credible corroborated statement from a witness in the case of a felony. Yet the courts have long held a stop may be conducted with RAS. Recently, 2019, Garver v Kansas, the court held that a license plate check, absent any suspicion or cause, that returned information regarding the registered owner, was sufficient RAS to stop a vehicle, without any reasonable belief that the registered owner and the current operator were the same person. I personally believe as has been case law for over a century, a person has the lawful right to defend themselves against an unlawful arrest, search, seizure or detention. Against any force under any symbol, uniform or advertised authority. Simply having a uniform does not give authority, does not make every order a lawful command. On one one hand, it does no good to argue law or argue your case with the officer on the road, his mind is already made up, the stop has already occurred. On the other hand, this should rile some hackles, I believe we are all sovereign citizens. Because the definition of sovereign is a prerequisite to freedom. The ultimate power and authority, the final determination. We are free, we choose to be citizen and give our consent to be governed under the constitution of the United States and the laws of the state in which we are. Consent must be freely given or it isn't consent. It must be given with fully informed knowledge as best as possible. A person cannot consent to what they have not been informed of. This said, requiring an officer to clearly state a person legal status and the cause upon which the officer is claiming authority seems ridiculously obvious in expectation. The alternative, and it is becoming this way, is that an officer because they claim to be, appear to and likely are real officer, have presumptive authority at their own discretion. In short if an officer says suck my D!≤k it is a lawful order because he's a cop. The reality is, courts do give officer this presumptive authority. A criminal dressed as a cop and claiming to be a cop would lawfully be able to commit any crime until it was proven unlawful. They get the presumption of innocence and authority, you and I a expected to submit to anyone identifying as a state agent regardless of law, rights etc, wait and deal with that in court is what we get told. Essentially RAS has a very simple definition. Something more than nothing but always improbable and whatever the officer decides. Courts cannot consistently define or determine when RAS exist or doesn't. But that doesn't even matter because no court, no judge, no magistrate or city attorney can rule on RAS, use RAS as grounds to give permission, grant authority or warrant action backed by lawful force. There is only one authority that can determine RAS, warrant lawful action and back that action with force under color of law. That one entity is every single individual who manages to get employed as law enforcement. It really doesn't matter what a judge later determines, especially not to people like Elijah McClain or Daniel Shaver. It does no good to find the officer was wrong when the harm has long since occurred. It's something of a fart in a windstorm to demand an officer articulate cause, charge or anything to a suspect. However I would suggest it is a constitutional right under due process if nothing else, that a person be clearly informed of the officers understanding regarding the citizens legal status. Over and over I've watched, witnessed and been party to officers refusing to clarify their position, their presumption of authority. Am I free to go? Am I under arrest? Is that a request or a lawful order? The difficulty in getting simple clarification on these basic questions should not exist, cannot exist within a society of free individuals with protected rights. This is the cost of freedom. You either surrender your rights just because you're told to or you risk additional charges and brutality for questioning. The current standards in the courts all but deny any right to resist even unlawful force, even deadly unlawful force a presumptively unlawful . You have the burden of showing why your defensive actions were justified by proving the lawful authority not only did not exist but couldn't be reasonable articulate subjective to the perspective of the officer. You are looking to the government to solve problems created by government. Suing requires you operate within the judicial branch of government to seek recompensation for acts committed by the same government. And any award you get will be paid by the same people who pay government, minus of course the administration, filing and recording fees the government makes. So yeah, it's a great business plan for them to encourage your suits, keeps them employed and brings in more money they can skim off. But it does nothing to address the root issues. Open transparency should be an obvious necessity of government in a free society. When government has "rights" that citizens don't, the citizen no longer has rights but maybe some privileges. Keep that in mind whenever you hear a person speak of an authority by calling it a right, address a privilege calling it a right. Cops don't have the right to.....they either have the authority or the privilege. Authority comes from law, privilege comes from position. Demanding identification is authority where the law applies, not wearing a seatbelt in violation of law is a privilege of office made as an exception in law. It's safest to assume the moment the lights come on that you are arrested and the officer is stating his authority under law. Even the term "lawful" command is deceptive. I can issue a command, it's not unlawful to do so therefore it is a lawful command it just has no lawful authority behind it, with exceptions of course. Anything the officer says or does it not unlawful is lawful, whether backed by lawful authority or not. Two different things really and the conflation of how we say things can leave a lot of ambiguity. How we know if an officer is acting on behalf of his own feelings and comprehensions of law or acting within the lawful constraints of law is impossible to determine. One practical solution is to eliminate the court constructed doctrines that give individuals authority without oversight. We don't need to eliminate human discretion on the individual level, in fact we would encourage that with the accompanying liability and accountability every individual must have. However we could simply eliminate RAS and at the very least significantly prohibit warrantless arrest. To me, an officer who witnesses an infraction doesn't have probable cause, he has reasonable cause based upon his own perspective. The officer has a purponderance of the evidence, first hand eye witness, dashcam, radar whatever. Honestly, not enforcing speed limits effectively is beneficial to policing in an investigatory policing state. It means the norm will be everyone speeds so there is always "cause" for pretextual investigatory stops searching for crime. Not that they can't find a reason to stop anyone anytime it's just a convenient excuse and keeps the revenue flowing. Imagine solving all crime and need for police, that would be perhaps the very worst thing to happen to government. It's almost like it is in the government's interest to perpetuate crime, increase crime, perpetrate crime or create crime. Perhaps by making more laws they actually create more crime and more need for more government and more laws. Maybe not.
@@eshootziscrs2868 Jesus you write no one is going to read through because you misunderstood. early in the video the channel owner states HE PAID money, and got the video footage but he got it competely blurred and unusable. I'm not sure if your just deepthroating the whole boot or are an idiot( i didn't read All That). but at least watch the video before jumping into the comments lol
@@ivanb4681 Not nearly as much as you failed to comprehend the reply, simply put, a suit is not a solution and you are never really suing the individual or the state, you are always suing the people. That's where both entities get their income from and they won't go broke so you and I will pay. Do you get that? Please, actually read before you respond even when it's a bit too much for you, otherwise why bother? Just looking for argument, feel necessary to criticize??? Really, why bother?
@@donniethezombie4495 Lmfao you hypocritical idiot, tells me to read right after saying I didn't read therefore have no idea what you said but you're wrong, lmfao. Let's go Brandon, tell me you don't know what a woman is without telling me you don't know what a woman is. What did the original comment say? Not what was said earlier in the video, I addressed the comment. He said that a person should sue, I pointed out A: the suit is paid by the people not some individual. Second, the state will and can redact anything it wants, in fact some states will not even release public records without a court order and then will still redact everything they think they can. The overall point is that this isn't the solution and it does not address the underlying root issues. But of course unless you can read, comprehend and give perspective, you would never understand. I know you really only replied because you wanted to criticize someone else to make yourself feel better and you lack attention so you seek arguments where you have no actual point or anything useful to add. Still, I sincerely appreciate your time and effort taken to publicly display your willful ignorance and hypocrisy. Be well, stay safe
I think it is more common than most people realize. From my understanding, some cops think it is a waste of time to go to court over stuff like speeding or expired plates, so they write the ticket, and never put it in, assuming that you will just pay it, and never pipe up when your inside doesn't hike your rate. I got a speeding ticket that never showed up in any records a few years ago.
@@deamontana596 I got pulled over driving my friends car he was drunk in passenger seat. My license was suspended. Cop wrote me a ticket but then realized how drunk the owner of vehicle was and he threw the ticket away without saying anything. I went to pay it and the city had no record of the ticket. Pretty sure that cop tossed it out realizing I was only driving because the owner of vehicle was so drunk.
@@AutoMotoMechanic not always… I got arrested and my car impounded for driving on a suspended license that I didn’t know was suspended. My brother got a ticket in my car and it had temporary tags that I needed my inspection done by the end of the month. My dad is a mechanic and could do it for free that Saturday (they expired Thursday). Well without saying anything he got pulled over for speeding but the cop thought he did him a favor for the inspection ticket instead. I used my parents address for mail and stuff so since I lived in the city, my brother got the mail and tossed it all. So I drove in the city for over a year with no issues , but the second I cross the county line I got pulled over and arrested and threatened. Because someone left a roach of k2 in the ashtray. They had to drop the possession because it wasn’t illegal. But my insulin needles were used to get me on “paraphernalia “. 😂 What a joke. Then the cop is was supposed to turn my drivers license in to PennDOT but never did. So I served my suspension plus another year (so 2), paid $3000 in fines, court costs, and impound fees, did a year probation and then come to find out, I was still suspended and hadn’t received credit for any of it because the cop never sent my license to them!
I used to admire sheriff lamb but you're known by the associates that you keep and apparently if he thinks this guy is okay to be working for him sheriff lamb is a bigger piece of s*** than I thought
I know that road. He was doing 71 in a 45. There are stop lights every couple miles, speeding like that can cause serious accidents, I know I've seen it.
You don't seem to know much of anything. The uniformed thug took the radar speed of a Chrysler allegedly going 71 mph. Then the uniformed thug accosted a man driving a Genesis. That's neither the correct make or model of vehicle. You are welcome.
@@Handle35667 Can you correctly ID every car passing you at 71 mph? He pulled the same car over that he clocked at 71 mph. It turns out it was a Genesis not a Chrysler. Minor, insignificant mistake.
Most states have it in their computers anyways and just because he does provide a paper copy, it could be invalid. The deputy could’ve also run his license in the meantime, he just wanted to stand there and be a dick.
@@flooryy forget stolen. dude was doing 26 miles over the speed limit. That's reckless driving in some states luckily for the driver it looks like Arizona isn't one of them cause I highly doubt this cop is the type to let a charge like that slide.
10 years ago or so, I was leaving Florida after spending a month staying there because there was no power where I lived in CT because of a freak October snowstorm. The FL state trooper asked for my License and I pulled out my wallet and I was like, Oh, my, I left it on my desk back in CT. He said to me: It's OK Paul (He already knew my name and what I looked at just from the license plate. He wrote me a ticket for doing 97 in a 70 and I went on my way. So pray tell, why do we even need to hand over a license if they know everything about us before they even come to the window?
Wait until electronic ID comes in. According to trucker friends of mine, their information pops up from their phone to the customs computer. They’ll be scanning your phones just driving around.
Are you always in your own vehicle? You've never driven a rental car? What if you want to drive a friend's vehicle somewhere? What if you're a plumber who drives a utility van that is owned by your company?
Driver's in the wrong, he has a legal obligation to provide ID. I dont care that Frank is an asshat, the driver spouting "civil rights" after going more than 20 over the limit.
@@xmarine73 Failing to ID is a misdemeanor crime. A traffic ticket is a citation. Pretty aure he just had two different court dates because of two different types of charges. Some states do that.All my citations in one stop were in one court and my failure to stop for blue lights was in a different court.
@@orvil9223 I'm not sure why you're replying to me. I'm also not sure why you're assuming anything about the original commenters version of events. He made it sound as if he had a traffic stop that he refused to ID up front on. They charged him with failure to ID and arrested him. Then they realized that failure to ID may not stick so they retaliated by making sure to ticket him for the traffic offense. What does which court room he's in have to do with anything? That wasn't the point of what he's sharing...
Hope you guys liked the video! I love using YouGov to make easy cash! Click my link: www.inflcr.co/SHF9S #YouGovPartner
Pinal County Sheriff's Office: facebook.com/PinalCountySO/
Submit your video: forms.gle/CUpEtoKF4cw7apur6
Merch: crowdmade.com/collections/lackluster
- Other Channels -
The Odd Side: th-cam.com/channels/TSdgjy509mgNBfAa4MQ3gw.html
Lady LackLuster: th-cam.com/channels/tj-_HlsiOHIZpdjIWsFi_w.html
Thank you for everything you do LL!
Hello mate I hope you're well! I was wondering if you've seen Annapolis Audit being attacked at a polling station? The States Attorney is refusing to press charges! He could really use the help from you about now! Much respect 🙏
Thanks for the information!
That A_hole cop represents MAJORITY law breaking "officers" who turned into new Slave Masters under color of law and Qualified IMPUNITY, backed up by government attorneys, judges "Injustice System" God FLUSH America😆😂🤣
@@fortyyearfitness that might have been what was said during the "missing footage" and he was told to tear up the ticket he wrote and not turn it in to the courts.
The sherrif of Pinal County wants to be a u s senator. He has 18 Brady list cops on staff
So it's the Brady bunch
so he can take county corruption to the federal level🤣
@@SidMorris-qo2dm he got crushed in the primary.
@@keithgreen9009😅😅😅
Magat cops
I am literally laughing out loud at the irony of this deputy saying that he can't stand people with that kind of condescending arrogant tone!
Techn9cian!!!! Ahooo ahooo ahoooo
@@technne-gu1yu Riot Maker!!
it's not "irony", it's hypocrisy.
*Did you hear him at the end? He WANTS it to go to court?*
*Is there a donation link? Or does the driver need representation?*
*I WANT it to go to court, ALSO.*
It's actually scary that he fits the psychological profile of someone the government wants wearing guns and body armor for "work."
He says "I have such a distain for people like him; just that condescending arrogant tone"
So he hates himself?
No i believe he means people who can do it better than him.
I was gonna say the only one behaving that way is the officer!
The hypocrisy!
The driver is in the wrong. Sorry your feelings are hurt baby
He could do without citizens at his job.
Hes on the Beady list for being a liar and cannot testify in court. Shocker!!
Ya, he’s lied to this guy several times.
How can you be a cop but not trustworthy enough to testify in court
Lol so every ticket taken to court gets dismissed? That's golden
@@gainz6718 I wish
@osteenjoseph I suspect that your question was rhetorical, but it's because they're ENFORCERS for the wealthy and politically connected (those who create laws and their donors). The enforcers' bosses care more about the number of boots on the ground keeping us in line than they care about their enforcers' ability to testify in court.
It's one of the reasons that we're told to fight it out in court rather than by the roadside. If we all started fighting back in the streets when they fail to uphold their end of the social contract, the enforcers would be overwhelmed and their bosses would lose control. If that happened, the gov would fear the people in lieu of the people fearing the gov.
The Supreme Court has previously ruled that an officer requesting a driver's license at a traffic stop is not considered a search or seizure (Kansas v. Glover). Also, it is in fact Arizona law that a driver must present their license and registration when requested at a traffic stop, regardless of the reason behind the stop, and failure to do so is a Class II Misdemeanor (A.R.S. 28-1595(B)).
Or you know, just don't do 71 in a 45.
What is considered a traffic stop in AZ? Just the activity of being pulled over? Does AZ law require identification “just because” at anytime whenever behind the steering wheel?
My municipal police idents themselves and reason for stop before asking for identification. Supposedly, they do that for officer safety. On the odd occasion the driver just murdered someone an hour earlier, it saves the officer from being shot if they just disclose the reason for the stop as a (simple) traffic violation.
If you're going to try cite law.... cite it correctly. Words matter. Arizona law requires a driver to "DISPLAY", not "present", not "hand over", etc. This officer who, "does this for a living" insists a person "GIVE ME" their driver's license, which is not a lawful command. He also instructs them to "not say another word", again a clear violation of the 1st Amendment and a "command" that is no where in his authority to issue.
28-3169. Possession and display of driver license; defense
A. A licensee shall have a legible driver license in the licensee's immediate possession at all times when operating a motor vehicle. On demand of a justice of the peace, a police officer or a field deputy or inspector of the department, a licensee shall DISPLAY the license.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Bootlicker. 💪👊🇺🇲 Not to me anyone. 💪👊🩸
@@DeathScouter WRONG. Your license is in fact property of the state. Handing it over is not an unreasonable request.
@@DeathScouter LOL
When he rolled the window up on him mid sentence 💀
Yeah! The cop wanted to monologue, so the driver let him.
Too many of these videos, the cop would have escalated the contempt of cop offense. This guy didn't, he just walked away - a little credit where due.
@@CVSoprano He was being videotaped and he knew it, obviously.
@@CVSoprano I think you might consider this is a TV production and the consequences of the type of escalation you are talking about. He would love to escalate but that wouldn't play well on TV.
@@wirenutt57no shit, he has a camera man in his passenger seat
This Frank is one of the most arrogant, condescending law enforcement officers I've ever witnessed. He shouldn't have a badge.
unfortunately for me.... he's not even in the top Five... condescending Kun ts I've had to deal with.
Im telling you go see his channels comments. Sheeple think he is the greatest thing since...[insert clever noun].
He's on the Brady-Giglio List
A Giglio or Brady list is a list compiled usually by a prosecutor's office or a police department containing the names and details of law enforcement officers who have had sustained incidents of untruthfulness, criminal convictions, candor issues, or some other type of issue placing their credibility into question.
This LEO is hypocritical, not sure if it’s the badge or the camera but he is 100% condescending.
and an ASSHOLE
Cop "if you don't give me your ID I'm going to drag you out of the car and take you to jail"
Two mins later same Cop "there was no reason to be confrontational like that"
Proof that just because you're conscious doesn't mean your self-aware
@N A he is a psychopath
Pull*
So true.
Yeah but this is a cops conscious they literally have no sense of accountability.
@N A lmao
Providing the reason why you have been pulled over should be the law nationally
Well, you get the reason for the stop when you are handed the citation.
Minus a reason to be detained, you have no infraction and no right to demand an ID.
@@hobbz7126 that doesn't prevent the cop from illegal detainment and unlawful search and seizure. Knowing why you are pulled over is literally needed in order to know if you need to comply. Or are you saying we should give up our 4th amendment before verification of a crime being suspected?
@@thatoneguyishere1662 It appears you're basing your comment on feelings and not facts. If you were to look at Arizona law, you would realize that cops are not required to provide the reason for a traffic stop. However, the law does require you to provide ID when asked during a traffic stop. It sure seems awfully arrogant to think you can tell police how to do their job when you don't even know the basic law.
@@hobbz7126 the law doesn't prevent them from telling us and the 4th amendment overrides everything you just said. The 4th amendment provides protection in the form of consent. By your logic the cops can just start shooting you legally and not tell you why until you're dead. Shut up
The most asshole comment was when the officer wanted the registration, the driver asked if he was allowed to reach it in the glove box and the officer answered with "unless it's going to magically appear in your hands".
Considering how often innocent people got shot because "they were reaching for something and i thought it was a gun" that is a perfectly reasonable question.
I always ask/announce where I am reaching when asked to produce documents for that very reason.
Just another way to make the driver look like a fool for the content. All part of the narrative he wants to control
it's important to preface it with, don't fucking shoot me, while I reach in my glove box.
Yep. I live on the border of TN and GA. At the time when I was 16 GA you had to provide proof of insurance and TN you didn’t. I got pulled over in TN and was instinctively reaching to get my Insurance from glovebox and heard “DONT BE STUPID DONT BE FUKING STUPID” and turned around to see the most scared old cop shaking as pointing his gun at my head. I truly didn’t understand what was happening.
I always ask now. I’ve often wondered how close I was to dying that day. The cop didn’t even give me a ticket he was shaking non stop and let me go.
Yup!! People have been KILLED by cops for reaching!!! What a sarcastic, stupid, blue line domestic terrorist!!!
He always bullies people no matter the situation. He's a psychopath on a power trip.
🤦♀️🙄🤮🤡
I never keep my registration or insurance card in a compartment, always on the visor so cops don’t get a look in that compartment. Remember people, plain view doctrine. Also, always print out a copy of your insurance so you don’t have to stop recording to retrieve it.
I do the same but only because I don’t want them to shoot my black ass. And this cop has such a disdain for how we treat them well we have hate for you
Pigs
@@abikeanditsboy3449 🤣🤣😂😂
@@abikeanditsboy3449 😂
Over here (UK) we're advised to not carry our drivers licence or insurance cover note (rare to get a paper one these days). The police give you a "producer" to attend a police station with them
@@abikeanditsboy3449 This exactly. Handing your unlocked cell phone to a cop is only asking for abuse.
The most disturbing part of this story is that they don't have body cams but they have a budget to produce a TV show...
You right so true smh
Facts
So True. So True.
And conservatives view this as patriotic and W
fair point , always film them violating the crap out of the 4th amendment
They like to portray this guy Frank as a good guy but he's just another lying cop.
Another arrogant pig you mean?
Yep, they edit these videos to make him seem like he has a sense of humor and he’s a real sweetheart, this is the way all cops are, this DIRTY COP believes he can do whatever he wants and he’ll lie doing it.
@lubabe9969 cops LIE ! Why the hell would I TRUST or Believe cops who are Allowed to LIE to me!!???
What did he lie about?
@@x548621793get the deleted footage and you'll know. Also, that car was keeping up with the pace of traffic around, no way they were doing 26 mph faster than the other cars.
Its so ironic he called the guy condescending with an arrogant tone..lol..What a psycho
Those programs are the reason why officers are like they are today.
This A_hole cop represents MAJORITY law breaking "officers" who turned into new Slave Masters under color of law and Qualified IMPUNITY, backed up by government attorneys, judges "Injustice System" God FLUSH America😆😂🤣
He definitely wasn't showing off for the camera.......
totally. he was mugging for the camera the entire time. the showing off backfired however. shows what an arrogant ass he is.
I knew it was a bad idea when that show first came on.
@@jameswithey8898 he was shaken those hips like Shakira
I heard of self unaware but this guy should get some sort of award.
Oh my god yes.
Live PD is hilarious because they violate your rights then the host explains how this is normal 😂
And that is why no one respects or is afraid of cops anymore. Think of the millions of rights violations that went on unchecked for decades before TH-cam and dash cams
The host is an attorney which is even more oxymoronic!
That's why is called television programming like run ID on everyone in the car for no reason makes people think it's normal and the law .
The man broke the law plain and simple! The officer didn’t do anything wrong it was the driver that got himself in that back and forth!
@@eviedechant If it was on the up and up, why didn't the cop show up for court? He said he was hoping the guy would take it to court so he could have another conversation with him. Just saying. Odd that most of the video was gone.
This officer use to be a Maricops county deputy. He quite prior to an investigation into him violating policy, and a theft accusation against him. He has a distain for the public in general.
It should be a law that if a cop interrupts your freedom by pulling you over, he must tell you the reason immediately. Not give them time to make something up.
There is a law Terry v Ohio.
Police: "can I see your ID"
Driver: "may I ask what crime I've committed?"
Police: "Well I need to see your ID first"
Driver: "What crime have I committed though why did you pull me over?"
Police: "That's what I'm trying to figure out that's why I need to see your ID"
Driver: "well if I didn't commit a crime I don't need to ID"
Police: "well if you don't provide your ID I'm going to pull you out of your car and arrest you"
Driver: "arrest me? for what crime?"
Police: "I'm trying to figure that out that's why I need to see your ID"
@@AzraelAngel781 Wrong. Cops don’t have to tell you their supposed reasonable suspicion. They just have to be able to articulate it later.
@@AzraelAngel781 Terry v Ohio isn't a law.
@@zyzzyz7035 they absolutely do. Independently verifiable evidence.
I absolutely LOVE how he rolled up the window while that uneducated tyrant was still talking.
all that was missing was the one finger salute.
Yeah! The cop wanted to monologue, so the driver let him.
Watch Sloup's face as the window gets about a inch from the top. It's a picture as he says "your winding the window up" then the deafening silence. Brilliant!
Power move.
Lol😂😂😂
Best moment of the video.
Cops: We want people to ask before reaching for anything
Also cops: "Unless it's gonna magically appear in your hands you have to reach into your glovebox"
"You don't have to put your seatbelt on, we aren't going anywhere" whilst activately going somewhere.
Perfect example the majority of cops personalities
This comment is an example of the majority of cop haters.
@@bigdoubleu117 this comment is an example of a majority of bootlickers.
@@andrewd374 This comment is an example of a majority of richard suckers.
I asked a cop once, to reach for my license, he said you don't have to ask. I said yeah just in case your jumpy and decide to pull a gun and ruin a bunch of lives, he told me I didn't have a clue what I'm talking about. Then he saw my LEO badge. Lol fucking ginger
@@bigdoubleu117 🐑
Baahahahaa that cop’s face when the window rolled up lol
Guy being respectful asking to reach into his glove box for safety of him and deputy is given a smart ass response.
Exactly. Otherwise, could have been shot.
And when you don't ask first, cops pull guns on you
The coproach was the condescending prick, not the driver. The driver is correct, what good is "our" 4th amendment if we have to identify before "We, the people" find out if it's even a lawful stop? FTP that expect ID first, because we've all seen the videos where many times it's NOT a lawful stop and the roid/road pirate is on a fishing expedition.
@@macpat6458 coproach, haha, that's a good one. 😆
@@jesarablack1661 some do either way, scum is scum.
Irony that he says he hopes he takes it to court cause every judge in AZ will side with him , then he never enters the ticket or shows up for court 🤣
Absolutely hilarious. Go figure
His dumbass is on the Brady list he can't testify
Because this cop is on The Brady List, he is barred from testifying in court.
Damn Sloup is a yankee as well his side kick Valentino for CGPD they all have a big ego to fill. Well good to know he is on the Brady’s list, guess he is a dirty Deputy.
Typical Tyrant Coward.
"There's no reason to be confrontational"
Right back at you buddy
Garauntee putting that window up would have gone way different if this officer was not on camera.
I went to school with this guy. I remember him getting picked on quite a bit for being a smarta$$ and little punk. I am glad to see he found a job where he can now feel like a man.
The criteria for pursing a career in law enforcement is that a person is either a pusillanimous ass or a bully. In either case, they use the position of power to compensate for their personal failures.
Another sad story about a little boy with a gun
Seems you guys didn't beat him hard enough.
yeah i totally believe you. nobody would ever go online and lie about things
@@yeeyee52 Or use a stupid name like Yee yee. You're right.
If police had any honor, there would be no need for qualified immunity.
Exactly.
🎤 drop
OOOOOOOOOH! Great point!
Qualified immunity is NOT the problem!
The problem is that it is so blatantly and shamelessly abused by criminals with badges (AND THEIR SUPERVISORS) … and as a result, must be abolished!
That was a joke right lol. Problem is hiring so many Beta males and females who think the badge and gun makes them Alphas
He hates arrogance WHILE being arrogant 🤣
Like every other one of Satan's kids...
They always point out in others what they themselves are doing.
He cant take what he dish out
Oxymoron..........
@@garhymes clap n’ laugh 👏🏻😂👏🏻😂👏🏻😂
Him immediately shouting and threatening to drag someone out the car set the tone for the stop.
COP: "I can't wait to go to court"
Also cop: *never shows up in court*
LOLL
Weirdo activity
Even with documented evidence of the radar, there are reasons why they come up wrong. There were other cars on the road. Nobody knows which one he was actually picking up. And unless he has valid documentation from the last time it was calibrated, he may as well leave it at the station.
@@7heRedBaron That was laser, not radar. The laser is less than 3ft wide at 1000ft which is the appx distance shown on the gun when he showed it to the camera. How wide is a standard car? Tell me you don't know what you're talking about without telling me you don't know what you're talking about.
@@mylt1z28 My opening line was that there are reasons they can come up wrong. I followed with some examples. I’m sure there are more.
He rolls up the window while he's still talking. I freaking LOVE THIS CHANNEL
-Of course the cop is upset when the script is not followed.
-Then TV-cop describes his own behavior, not that of the driver.
-No seatbelts means TV cop can leap out of his squad car like he was Magnum PI.
Yikes imagine if that cop was your dad or husband, I bet he's a real sweetheart.
I have a feeling black eyes and the phrase "Why do you make me do this to you!?" are a common occurrence in his household.
"I have such a disdain for people like him......that condescending arrogant tone"
Congratulations deputy you just described yourself to a T
What a fool
They hate peasants.
My thoughts exactly 💯
Absolutely! The classic “You spot it, you got it.” I think He somehow thinks he will come off as… clever? Or big? Doesn’t realize what a d-bag he comes across as.
This officer is a prick.
8:28 Police officer explains why he can't look at "the guy" in the mirror. Colorized.
This officer should be fired hes sarcastic and escalates situations and this proves hw corrupt this officer is but when trump gets in office he's going to give all law enforcement federal immunity / amnesty from prosecution check it out it all over the web
This deputy reminded me of a phrase that was taught to me as a young man. Son you can learn a lot more by listening, than you can by talking. Well that and, the irony of His disdain for arrogance.
I'm STILL laughing at dude just calmly rolling his window up on the cop.🤣
Yeah! The cop wanted to monologue, so the driver let him.
That was awesome!!!😎😎😎😎😎
Now picture him rolling his window up in Frank's face… in court. 😂
I was rolling 🤣 😂 😭
It could have been funnier if the driver had written ...F**K You... on the window. LOL
This LEO has serious issues - he thinks he is Chicago PD. His TV persona has gone to his head. He is a timebomb waiting to explode. Pinal County AZ is opening themselves up for serious liability.
HAHAHAHAHA, now dats funny he wouldn't last very long with that attitude in Chicago, or Washington DC 🤣 😆 😂, 1st other officer wouldn't wanna be partnered with him.
And there lies the problem, the county is liable, meaning us the taxpayers. That prick has nothing to worry about. 🖕🇺🇸
They don’t care because the citizens will be on the hook for any payments from his actions. They’ve investigated themselves and found no wrong doing.
what do you mean by he thinks he is Chicago PD? could you explain?
@@babayaga9102 because its a dumb tv show where the cops do things you'd never get away with in reality. This cop tho did nothing wrong
This cop is arrogant and thinks he is the greatest thing since sliced bread. He is a danger to the public and doesn't belong on the road carrying a badge and gun. Unstable cops seem to always find ways to get hired. This clown in uniform is all talk and no action.
This guy is getting “stop and ID” confused with “traffic stop detention” you are required by law to provide your drivers license once pulled over.
He should state the reason for the stop before anything else.
the point of the video is to show how police departments use the media to change the over all narrative.
@@danbscPerhaps he should, if asked. But is not required by law to do so.
@@AntiPlatitudesoon will be in most states because of arrogant cops like him. What’s the harm in saying why you stopped me? Besides an ego? If I’m speeding just tell me I’m speeding. We’re both adults.
@@dariuswhite2148 oh, I agree. He should, in my opinion, tell the driver why he or she has been stopped. Maybe there’s some good reason(s) that they do not do it. I’ve seen quite a bit of footage of this deputy, and it seems like his reason for not doing it is almost purely to establish his authority and/or dominance.
Him talking to the cameraman for so long is prolonging a traffic stop much longer than it needs to be.
Not really. He was waiting for the driver to update his insurance app and pull up the information.
Which is a *drum roll please* violation of the Fourth Amendment!!
@@ClunkerSlim no he wasn’t, he was issuing the citation.
PEARSE COP IS A F___CKING ACTOR,LOVES HIMSELF ON CAMERA!
For his acting career
Cops used to be the #1 most-watched show in prison.
Cops, judge shows and the stories are all always on no matter what jail you go to
@@davidhowell1415 truth. That's why I read a book every day. Nothing else to do worth doing. I actually miss being able to read that much, just not in that setting.
And we classified it as Educational TV.
That A_hole cop represents MAJORITY law breaking "officers" who turned into new Slave Masters under color of law and Qualified IMPUNITY, backed up by government attorneys, judges "Injustice System" God FLUSH America😆😂🤣
@@davidhowell1415 true
COPS THINK IT IS THEIR JOB TO TEACH US A LESSON!
@@mini30coupe isn't it tho...
funny how he didn't show up for court despite being so aggressive?
"I hope I see him again so we can have a cordial conversation again." No shows the court date. There had to be something said in the edited out footage that he was reprimanded for. Gotta be the reason why he didn't show.
all for the camera just like his attitude for the show
Probably busy bossing children around a crosswalk
I bet those cameramen know his's an asswipe.
It's funny how they only show up if they get paid, but most people miss work to get to court. Didn't pay the fine, but couldn't earn that day's wages
Nate needs to get a dash cam that records your speed
ALSO, front and rear with microphone. I have both, the State Patrol pulled me over late at night. The first words out of his mouth was i see you have dashcams front and back.. I said yes I do... I was supposedly going 54 in a 50. He stated to me that he did not actually use radar or lazer. He said they had a camera set up. Also, he said he was using the BMW that had already passed me to determine my speed. I asked him why he did not pull over the BMW. He did not respond.
They have it’s called cruise control just set it for gods sake,,,
@@frederickconnell6052 you cant take cruise control into court to fight a speeding ticket. For pete’s sake.
@@Cooldaddio2 have yu not got a phone with a time and date on it take a snap of it,,think ahead man
@@Cooldaddio2 You're missing the fact that the officer can file a subpoena for that same dash cam footage to prove you were in fact speeding. And he can do that right on the side of the road and seize your dash cam. Having a dash cam is a double edged sword. While it may prove you weren't speeding in one case, it can prove you were in another.
Umm well, “he started his phone like I was going to do something wrong.” Actually it seems like he knew perfectly just exactly what sort of criminal activity you were about to perpetrate and then he recorded it.
It would seem to be an absolute must issue considering they have no body cams
Wells said!👍
Nice unmarked cars too. Ahole cops in unmarked cars, starring in their own propaganda shows, while sitting in their fancy cars chatting and making bank+pension to do it. Such a "hard job". He needs at least 3 spinoff series, and a statue, plus a butt warmer in his car. And there weren't nearly enough lanes shut down, or cops sitting there doing nothing, lets just go ahead and close down the entire highway and fill it with cops so they can hang out and chat with their buddies about how great they are.
But Deputy sloup did nothing wrong here haha everything said was straight to the point and constitutional and followed state law. Deputy Sloup answered any and all questions that retained to the stop.
Wait did dude record himself going 26 over the speed limit?? That's the only criminal activity that was in the video. Or am I wrong? Even in the video all the laws the officer followed were stated in the video. Did u only watch the parts u wanted to watch?
As someone who lives in this county…the cops will ride your ass and fly around you and flip you off if you aren’t going fast enough for them. They pull people over on hunt hwy acting like it’s crazy they are going 60 mph in a 45 but EVERYONE goes 60 plus on that road. And the cops go even faster. You see the cops all over the roads, they are literally everywhere.
The way that oinkster describes the guy he pulled over is so ironic. It's like he can't even see the blatant reality that he's describing himself!
Exactly.
He used a lot of words to avoid saying a few simple words that would have satisfied the drivers request for a reason for being stopped.
This dude is unhinged... This cops home life is absolutely terrible.
“I have such disdain for guys like him with that condescending and arrogant tone” that he says in a CONDESCENDING AND ARROGANT TONE!!!🤦
I see this SO much, where people project their own faults on others.
He was showing off for the dude w him.
Projection at it's finest.
He is such a pompous ass.
Not providing ID may well be a secondary charge. The primary offence was speeding and i don't think he needs to wait for a conviction before then charging you with refusing to ID.
The officer's lack of self awareness is epic.
Their was a 2nd unit on scene
@@chrisestridge3030 And..?
...a ticking timebomb.
@@chrisestridge3030 🤦🏻♂️ not situational awareness….SELF AWARENESS. The cop is acting as petty and as condescending as possible just to tell his camera man how much he hates condescending people. 🤣
What you just implied is that it’s ok for the officer to act like a hypocrite because other officers were on the scene 🤣. I’m starting to question YOUR self awareness now🤣
@@mikehuff9793
I vote for Mike Huff
I live in Arizona, and that law needs to change. If the cops pull us over, they need to articulate the reason(s) why.
In Maryland the few times I’ve been pulled over they asked me if I knew why I was pulled over. Never answer this question. There is no correct answer to what do you think you were doing illegal. If I have the nerve someday, I will say it’s because of the large shark fin on the roof of my car. Lacking such, I would expect him to say You don’t have one. To which I would ask, so I’m free to go?
By law in all 50 states of the USA, police have to tell you why you were pulled over
@@ArchAnge11 It comes down to when, though.
Or at least say who the hell they are. No greeting or anything
Just look at the recent AZ politics is enough for me to never trust that state.
This cop is corrupt and sarcastic to citizens and the disdainment he has towards citizens is very obvious but his leadership will defend his disdainment and sarcasm towards citizens
The eye roll, blow me the cop knows why the citizen asked to reach into the glove box, because if he didn’t the cop might “fear for his life” and pull his service pistol.
Precisely.
Exactly
"I have such a disdain for people like him" he meant anyone who is smarter than himself
Even the old oak tree that some man pee against is smarter than this arrogant hypocritical insane uniformed criminal.
"I hate people who want to know what's going on"
Translation: "I have such a disdain for people who don't mindlessly obey whatever I tell them to do instantly and without any question, even when it's a violation of their rights."
Fixed it for him. Though we would also have accepted "I have such a disdain for people" as a complete and accurate statement.
That's alotta disdain
XODZ PHONE THIS SOB IS REALLY FULL OF HIMSELF!
It’s hilarious how the officer expresses his opinion on the man in the vehicle when he gets back into his car, but everything that the officer says about the guy, he was doing.
I can guarantee you that if cameras weren’t following this guy… he would be a psychopath towards citizens.
"Unless it's going to magically appear in your hands, you kind of have to, right?"
Had he just reached without asking, he might have been shot! Keep your sarcasm to yourself, officer
Unfortunately that DIDN’t happen in this case☹️
Unreal...the cop had to make a snotty remark when the guy nicely told him, he was going to open his glove compartment. If someone just went to go reach for it..and the cop doesn't have his head on for whatever reason....he could have gotten killed. I've watched videos where this has happened.
So true
I've seen exactly that happen and officer claimed person was reaching for something and he feared for his life.
I've had a cop pull a gun on me for retrieving my information from my glovebox as he requested, even told him I was reaching for the requested documents.was years ago and back them I was ignorant and uninformed.
@@christopherdoyle2955 bet it changed your view on life.
Must be nice that someone has the time to do all this editing of someone being foolish. The driver was speeding and the officer has the right to demand proof of identity, registration, and insurance as a violation was observed. This is dictated under the privilege of driving and explained when applying for a drivers license.
Driving is the act of transport for hire or monetary gain.
Traveling, which is a right NOT a privilege is different. And The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on this in multiple cases.
lol@@TACTICALNOMAD
@@TACTICALNOMAD Another thing that's been ruled on "in multiple cases" is that sovereign citizens interpretation of the law is grossly inaccurate.
@@crooked-halo, there are people inaccurately citing the facts of being a sovereign citizen, but sovereignty and the rights that go with that are inherent, and no person or body has the right to negate nor diminish those inherent rights. Regardless of what "law" is passed. If a law violates ANY Constitutionally protected rights, and they're protected due to the very nature that our rights are bestowed upon at and by birth, then that law is null and void.
The biggest violation of laws that attempt to turn rights into privileges violates The Thirteenth Amendment.
People need to read, learn amd understand that NO BODY, GOVERNMENT or OTHERWISE has the right to rule dominion over another...PERIOD!
The Pinal county sheriffs office has the time to do all this editing of Frank (sometimes) being foolish. The driver was accused of speeding, it was not proven in a court of law, in America we don't convict people on the side of the road. Frank said it was a Chrysler clear as day and we know super Frank does this for a living all day long, he tells everyone that on every stop. How could such a super cop get the make of the car wrong? Does he not know a Chrysler from a fancy new Hyundai? Seems dubious, or Frank isn't as great as he says he is. But, he got him on laser at 1000 yards! Wow, what a super duper cop but I wonder if the operations manual recommends using the device at nearly 1/5th of a mile away? Sorry, CASE DISMISSED. Frank's own arrogance created serious reasonable doubt in this case. No matter what traffic law you quote the Constitution and the 4th amendment cannot be infringed. So, stop licking boots and expect government agents to be professional and follow the law.
Would love for you to do a episode just on officer Frank. Mention his lying in court and being put on the brady list.
Did anyone else notice that the car that pinged his radar/laser was the dark colored Chrysler, which was confirmed by his stating “Chrysler” when getting into his vehicle, but the car he pulled over was a lighter colored Genesis.
Well he could’ve just gotten the model wrong but yes he does say dark color Chrysler and then pulls over a light color Hyundai Genesis so that is pretty fucking funny. Maybe that’s what the edit is for?
The Genesis was at the top of the hill and was the car he was tagging, the cameraman was just very bad at his job. By the time you hear the solid tone, the black Cadillac was much closer than 1076ft. The Genesis does look darker as it crest the hill but that's just the reflection of the sky combined with the awful cameraman. He even says, "that one right there" right as the Genesis passes him. The cop is still a punk bitch but he got the right car.
@@MurderedJZZ30 cop also didn’t submit the ticket like a punk bitch too
That might be why he didn't enter the citation.
@@MurderedJZZ30 I rewatched it multiple times... there was definitely another car between the Chrysler and the Genesis.
The projection from this cop is truly astounding.
Could power a drive-in theater
Remember that quote from the movie "the departed" where leo decaprio says "there's no one more full-of-shit than a cop that knows hes on camera"
truth.
@@randalthor6872 I haven’t heard that before but I will definitely be using that in the future 😂
Psychopaths and sciociopaths are known to be constant projectors. Officer Sloape is FOR SURE one of those and a HUGE pos
@@randalthor6872 Did he really say that? Man, I watched this masterpiece numerous times but missed it obviously :|
It's called "TV programming" for a reason.
So with the whole ticket not being in court is because they are useing and thing where they put in the computer and it automatically sends it to the court but there was a glitch in the system. And second the reason why deaputy sloup got mad is because nate was telling him how to do his job, and nate was in the wrong. By a long shot. And also he send this up to the sheriff and also judge and he said nothing was wrong here and no policy's were broken. So if we are going off on hurt feelings because he got mad because someone trying to be a smart ass with him then yall need to put you big boy pants on and go see the world
There's nothing more scary or dangerous than a constitutional sheriff deputy that shows off in front of a camera.
I beg to differ! Check this video watch?v=BHBbJAIcnBI at 1:26.
I can just imagine if he acts like this in front of the camera how he acts without it or honestly how he acts knowing the cameraman will delete any footage he wants.
Clout is a very dangerous drug lol
Did you mean UNCONSTITUTIONAL? Because this Sheriff isn't Constitutional.
@@demsareunamerican6800 this is true
Nice caught them openly admitting to the destruction of evidence!
When commercial video production techniques collide with government requirements. I worked in broadcasting at the turn of the century. Footage was commonly recorded over or deleted to simplify storage and make a finished product quicker. Also, it helped to reduce the editing error rate.
Lackluster is a hypocrite of epic proportions. Are you aware of what Lackluster did? If you did, then you'd know that his posting of videos is just outrageous. He has zero credibility.
Oh the irony of that clown calling the driver condescending. 😂
i believe he was too
Clown was the driver
@@mikeswink1031 clown was the cop
You have been added to the do not respond list for all Police Agencies. You're on your own. Now....your wife beater shirt is not a good look. Take note.
@@maitlanddarragh5676 BS
Frank has a deviant misunderstanding of what the law is. Dude is a bully.
The driver broke the law. It is not unreasonable to ask for ID first.
Yes of course. It has nothing to do with civil rights. Driving is a privilege.
Did he? Cop clearly says in video Chrysler than proceeded to pull over a Hyundai
@@Goalreacher-1 genesis
The unreasonable part is DEMANDING identification without giving a reason.
Right out of the Nazi playbook
Well, it's a lackluster video so not much "news" here.
This deputy thought he was cordial!?! 😂
That's scary
Did we watch the same video. He was cool when he walked up. The driver opened up like a condescending jerk. He was driving not just walking down the street
@@dexter726 but he doesn't need to.. come on I love these audit guys a lot of them expose some serious abuse. But this guy is an amateur pretending . That's the real problem he is making the rest look bad. Cop was snippy but the dude was also arrogant. He claimed he knew the law but he didn't.
@@dexter726 yup. Both jerks.
He was the opposite of cool. He walked up knowing he was gonna ticket him. And his face reads satisfied all over it. Not a good police officer lmao
That is why this very officer is on the Brady List.
Awesome stuff. As an unhoused, unsheltered homeless person (since May) I've been recording the unbelievable LEO contacts I've had and posting them to My own channel for the very reasons you've highlighted.
I used to think most of these type of TH-cam vids were an exaggeration or deliberately manipulated thru editing to make LEOs seem less noble & credible.
My own unfortunate circumstances+ personal experiences have opened my Eyes.
Anytime and Everytime I have contact with someone of Authority I hit the record button.
It's truly the biggest equalizer We citizens have ever been handed since the Gutenberg Press.
Keep up the Good Word brother and Cheers from Portland 🦞⚓👍
Remember, the church was really upset with Guttenberg for printing bibles. They wanted only priests to give you interpretations or opinions on what was actually written.
Cops don't like cameras for similar reasons, they don't want anyone else to know how they butcher the law and how badly they treat the people who pay their salary.
Abolish qualified immunity.
"creditable??"
@@ThatOne77 thanks for the spell check. I missed that one 👍
I hope you get past troubled times in good speed! I was lucky, I had experiences ranging from mildly unpleasant to awful, life-threatening starting as a teenager. I have not needed the slow awakening that many Americans are going through now.
Over the last few years the police departments here in Arizona have become increasingly tyrannical. I have noticed since installing a multi camera dash cam the pull up with thir lights on then notice the camera is recording and all of a sudden they either shut them off and go on their way or pretend they were after someone else only to go up the road a ways and shut them off
Yeah I have a camera that goes out the back out the front end on the inside and then I have another camera if I get pulled over that shoots out the driver's door and one that shoots out the passenger Door
Yeah it seems like the pigs in AZ have gotten very tyrannical.
@@robertmiddleton1227 let me guess now that you have them you don't get bothered
@@GeorgeJefferson1775 yes they have
@@shieldwolf8093 Not like I used to get bothered by the police before
COPs that do not file their tickets nor show up in court when they should - should be tracked and held in CONTEMPT of COURT if this is a regular occurrence...
Actually you need to be thankful that the officer might not show up, so that if people want to contest a particularly pesky ticket, the officer might be a no-show, and that the ticket is dismissed.
In Tampa Florida they issued a policy that every officer has to show up for any ticket they write, even if it is on their day off and so forth, and this makes challenging a ticket much more of a chore. If you think an officer is unreasonable, then imagine how much more reasonable they are when dragged into court on their day off, or when they have to appear at night after a day shift.
@@Menstral them being unreasonable in front of a judge works in your favor if the ticket was unjust to begin with. And if it was just, why are you contesting it?
@@Menstral Of course, if he doesn't have to show up, he is free to write harassing tickets just to inconvenience drivers they don't like. The driver is forced to take a day off of work and possible drive to some city where de does not live to defend himself from bullshit accusations. Then the cop doesn't have to show up and doesn't have to justify why he wrote the ticket.
It was fake.
@@Menstral they still get paid.
Love how the window is closed while he was talking! 😂😂😂
Yeah! The cop wanted to monologue, so the driver let him.
Cop: Acts as condescending as a person can.
Also Cop: I can't stand condescending people.
Cop simply doing his job and speeding jerkoff giving an attitude for doing so isn’t right. Maybe you should look up the meaning or the word condescending in the dictionary before you show your clear ignorance buddy. 😂😂😂
If I'm driving and pulled over, I hand my license and insurance right away
I don't get why people resist that when they're driving
If you're walking around and recording video, that's a different story
@djimiwreybigsby5263 when you actually made a mistake and did something wrong, complying is the only reasonable action. However, if you're not aware, law-abiding citizens are abused every single day by officers. A traffic stop could be a fishing expedition, a fake "matching description" can lead to false arrest, or a call for help could lead to getting shot in the face.
With some LE training, I can tell you with certainty that officers get trained to be manipulatively "nice." You think you're being civil and reasonable by complying without question, but the fact is many officers rely on naivety and ignorance for people to dehumanize themselves by alienating their own civil rights.
Bottom line, we're all accountable for our actions; and the public should be particularly interested in demanding integrity and accountability from gun-wielding enforcers that are trained to manipulate and physically dominate.
“Your required to produce your proof of insurance in a timely manner”
Remember that when they pull you over and they want to take 20 mins writing you a ticket when they’re trying to give their buddy with the K9 extra time to make it to your location.
This tool clearly thinks he’s some sort of TV star.
I think that timely manner is when he (or any officer) is standing on side of the road with no protection?
@@PhillipReid28absolutely not. Timley manner is for the civilian and it applies to ALL stops. They legally can't extend the stop more than required. People beat serious charges every single day because of this.
Some cop- "I really hope this goes to court. I hope with every fiber of my being that I get to go and see him again."
Also some cop- *Doesn't show up for court*
😂🤣😂🤣
Because he is a coward underneath his clown costume. Super obvious.
Didn't even enter the ticket into the system. That means he probably doctored the laser gun.
Seriously the fact he deleted the part where he was talking about his evidence and it's accuracy and started by saying how he lined up the laser on him and followed him exactly and then didn't show up for court makes me think he was just doing a traffic stop for the show probably not intending to give a ticket until the driver didn't cower in his presence and beg for forgiveness so he lost his cool but after the fact he prolly realized he gave himself away at the part he cut out and was afraid a judge would make him show or explain what was missing. Truly amazing how you can tell his really believes himself when saying the driver was condescending and rude first when clearly his response to the driver asking what he pulled him over for was clearly the first condescending and abrasive statement made
it's a fkn reality tv show.
@@fransmith8992: So say you. What's the name of this 'fucking reality tv show' and in which episode can we view this in its entirety? I'll wait, despite my gut feeling doing so will prove a complete waste of time. I can already tell you are a disingenuous person because you lack the integrity to actually spell out what you're intending to message. As you can see, that does not apply to me.
This cop likes to talk to himself in the mirror, and when the driver put his window up i thought the cop was going to start crying hahaha
JAMES STEAD, LOVED THAT,BEST PART OF THE ENCOUNTER!
The type of pompous poser that Frank is dealing with of course is driving a Genesis SUV and is certain in his mind that it's just as good as a Porsche or Bentley and should be given special treatment.
This is the same type of guy who thinks getting a cubic zirconia ring for his lady is just as good as a diamond and everyone else is just stupid for spending more.
There's nothing worse than a cheapskate know it all, he's lucky his Hyundai didn't blow up for doing more than 70 mph
I am worried there is too much confidence their leaders won't hold them accountable for their actions.
They won't and he knows it
Cop: "he has an issue with what the definition of law is"
Also this cop: *destroys evidence*
Cop also said, "you can't believe everything you on the internet" and "this has nothing to do with civil rights" so he's not very self aware.
He realized that he was recorded being an arrogant prick and didn't want to give this stop viral video legs, so he conveniently tossed the ticket, hoping it would all just magically go away. Unfortunately for officer dickface, he's on his way to becoming famous for his arrogant attitude anyway.
@@gregogrady8027 Except the pig _DID_ know how the 4th Amendment applies to a traffic stop. It was the driver that screwed it up. The cop was an asshole...but he was right and the driver was wrong. When pulled over for a traffic infraction in Arizona (I'm pretty sure all states, but definitely in Arizona), drivers are required by law to display their valid driver's license upon demand of a cop, and failure / refusal to do so is a class 2 misdemeanor.
The 4th Amendment in no way prevents swine from demanding a driver's license during a traffic stop, even without telling the driver the reason for the stop. Way too many auditors and "rights defenders" _think_ they know and understand the law, but they actually get simple things like this absolutely wrong. A traffic stop is absolutely not the same as a cop approaching you on the street, whether you or the driver in this video like or understand that.
The pig was still an asshole, and he's clearly a useless piece of shit, since he couldn't even be bothered to file the damned ticket. But him being a piece of shit doesn't make his understanding of the law in this specific scenario incorrect.
The cop didn't destroy anything. The cameraman did, according to the department's PR department.
@@davereeves1967 I guess the camera man destroyed the ticket too. Think much?
I dont think the guy understands how the "Stop and identify thing works" hes right that he cant be stopped just to be identified, unles hes being accused of committing a crime which he 100% was being accused beacuse he did.
THANK YOOOOOU!!!! All these ridiculous comments are pissing everyone off.
Absolutely, and the exact reason the cop should have done his job, told the guy I'm stopping you for speeding and the guy would have happily handed over the license. It was an obvious overt challenge to Frank's masculinity and his ego took over. Is it really his job to threaten violence over a speeding ticket when it's really his ego we're talking about. Listen, the guy was a dick but let's be honest... you really want to live in a country that cops have no limits? Me either and the Constitution doesn't say you have to be nice about standing up for your rights and in fact they apply to all citizens. Problem here with the pissed off commenters pissed off about the comments pissing every one off is that they miss the point. You don't have to like people but they still have rights just like you.
@@mnn1265bro what r you even talking about? When did he broke the guys rights? 🤣 speedster was being a dick so don’t expect others to be nice to him even cops. He’s doing traffic stops not customer service. If you’re an asshole to a cop, the cop doesn’t have to be nice back. Could argue is not as professional but not illegal or unethical
@@Emmanuisaac I'm I supposed to take your comment seriously?
Speeding is NOT a crime, it's a civil infraction. Learn what the term "law" means.
Basically everyone sucks in this video. 🙄
You are 1000% right about how these agencies PRODUCE their videos to fit a stated NARRATIVE. Instead of the video speaking for itself. I always thought agencies were especially corrupt and shady how they would arrest someone, then later change charges after the fact once video gets seen by unbiased eyes.
You arrest someone, either they did something,, or they didn't!...Not arrest, THEN "see how it looks, or feels" to fit your explanation
Remember when DPS held a press conference and tried to say that the police were brave at Uvalde? Lies. Complete lies. And then the truth came out.
If they blur
edact anything other than private information, you need to sue them for making you pay for footage you can not use. Or at least demand a refund.
You mean sue you right? "They" don't pay anything, they get paid. We pay them, pay for the cameras, pay for the equipment ( realizing this situation is slightly abnormal in the fact that the cameraman could be a private party and the footage not necessarily public)
And we pay them to delete our own evidence or blur the transparency of the record.
The officer notes, correctly so, that there is no law requiring he identify his cause. There is case law supporting the constitutional requirement that a person arrested be informed they are under arrest and the nature of the charges against them. However that case law also allows nothing relating a traffic stop to an arrest, the information is only suggested when possible and practical while the informing of cause or charges is really only for the in court.
This is a bit off topic specifically but I believe is a broader perspective that addresses these issues.
The fourth amendment reads,
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
The phrasing leaves no doubt that a reasonable search or seizure is possible and the people would have no right to be free from violation under such "reasonable cause". However there is no period rather a comma indicating that what defines "reasonable" is being addressed. Reasonable would according to a literal reading be defined by a court either finding probable cause and issuing a warrant or not finding cause and denying authority under color of law.
What has been sold to us over a century of time is to ignore this plain text understanding that only a court has the jurisdiction to find probable cause and issue a warrant. This can hardly be argued as anything but an intentional separation of the powers between the executive/ law enforcement branch and the judicial branch. A check on the abuse of the authority law enforcement has under the law that might be abused if the law is incorrectly interpreted or applied.
As noted by the narrator, cops usually have probable cause of a traffic violation, they actually witnessed the infraction. Under the law, an officer is limited in his arrest powers to when he personally witnesses a misdemeanor or has a credible corroborated statement from a witness in the case of a felony. Yet the courts have long held a stop may be conducted with RAS. Recently, 2019, Garver v Kansas, the court held that a license plate check, absent any suspicion or cause, that returned information regarding the registered owner, was sufficient RAS to stop a vehicle, without any reasonable belief that the registered owner and the current operator were the same person.
I personally believe as has been case law for over a century, a person has the lawful right to defend themselves against an unlawful arrest, search, seizure or detention. Against any force under any symbol, uniform or advertised authority. Simply having a uniform does not give authority, does not make every order a lawful command. On one one hand, it does no good to argue law or argue your case with the officer on the road, his mind is already made up, the stop has already occurred. On the other hand, this should rile some hackles, I believe we are all sovereign citizens. Because the definition of sovereign is a prerequisite to freedom. The ultimate power and authority, the final determination. We are free, we choose to be citizen and give our consent to be governed under the constitution of the United States and the laws of the state in which we are. Consent must be freely given or it isn't consent. It must be given with fully informed knowledge as best as possible. A person cannot consent to what they have not been informed of.
This said, requiring an officer to clearly state a person legal status and the cause upon which the officer is claiming authority seems ridiculously obvious in expectation. The alternative, and it is becoming this way, is that an officer because they claim to be, appear to and likely are real officer, have presumptive authority at their own discretion. In short if an officer says suck my D!≤k it is a lawful order because he's a cop.
The reality is, courts do give officer this presumptive authority. A criminal dressed as a cop and claiming to be a cop would lawfully be able to commit any crime until it was proven unlawful. They get the presumption of innocence and authority, you and I a expected to submit to anyone identifying as a state agent regardless of law, rights etc, wait and deal with that in court is what we get told.
Essentially RAS has a very simple definition. Something more than nothing but always improbable and whatever the officer decides.
Courts cannot consistently define or determine when RAS exist or doesn't. But that doesn't even matter because no court, no judge, no magistrate or city attorney can rule on RAS, use RAS as grounds to give permission, grant authority or warrant action backed by lawful force. There is only one authority that can determine RAS, warrant lawful action and back that action with force under color of law. That one entity is every single individual who manages to get employed as law enforcement.
It really doesn't matter what a judge later determines, especially not to people like Elijah McClain or Daniel Shaver. It does no good to find the officer was wrong when the harm has long since occurred.
It's something of a fart in a windstorm to demand an officer articulate cause, charge or anything to a suspect. However I would suggest it is a constitutional right under due process if nothing else, that a person be clearly informed of the officers understanding regarding the citizens legal status.
Over and over I've watched, witnessed and been party to officers refusing to clarify their position, their presumption of authority. Am I free to go? Am I under arrest? Is that a request or a lawful order? The difficulty in getting simple clarification on these basic questions should not exist, cannot exist within a society of free individuals with protected rights.
This is the cost of freedom. You either surrender your rights just because you're told to or you risk additional charges and brutality for questioning. The current standards in the courts all but deny any right to resist even unlawful force, even deadly unlawful force a presumptively unlawful
. You have the burden of showing why your defensive actions were justified by proving the lawful authority not only did not exist but couldn't be reasonable articulate subjective to the perspective of the officer.
You are looking to the government to solve problems created by government. Suing requires you operate within the judicial branch of government to seek recompensation for acts committed by the same government. And any award you get will be paid by the same people who pay government, minus of course the administration, filing and recording fees the government makes. So yeah, it's a great business plan for them to encourage your suits, keeps them employed and brings in more money they can skim off. But it does nothing to address the root issues. Open transparency should be an obvious necessity of government in a free society. When government has "rights" that citizens don't, the citizen no longer has rights but maybe some privileges. Keep that in mind whenever you hear a person speak of an authority by calling it a right, address a privilege calling it a right. Cops don't have the right to.....they either have the authority or the privilege. Authority comes from law, privilege comes from position. Demanding identification is authority where the law applies, not wearing a seatbelt in violation of law is a privilege of office made as an exception in law.
It's safest to assume the moment the lights come on that you are arrested and the officer is stating his authority under law. Even the term "lawful" command is deceptive. I can issue a command, it's not unlawful to do so therefore it is a lawful command it just has no lawful authority behind it, with exceptions of course. Anything the officer says or does it not unlawful is lawful, whether backed by lawful authority or not. Two different things really and the conflation of how we say things can leave a lot of ambiguity. How we know if an officer is acting on behalf of his own feelings and comprehensions of law or acting within the lawful constraints of law is impossible to determine. One practical solution is to eliminate the court constructed doctrines that give individuals authority without oversight. We don't need to eliminate human discretion on the individual level, in fact we would encourage that with the accompanying liability and accountability every individual must have. However we could simply eliminate RAS and at the very least significantly prohibit warrantless arrest. To me, an officer who witnesses an infraction doesn't have probable cause, he has reasonable cause based upon his own perspective. The officer has a purponderance of the evidence, first hand eye witness, dashcam, radar whatever. Honestly, not enforcing speed limits effectively is beneficial to policing in an investigatory policing state. It means the norm will be everyone speeds so there is always "cause" for pretextual investigatory stops searching for crime. Not that they can't find a reason to stop anyone anytime it's just a convenient excuse and keeps the revenue flowing. Imagine solving all crime and need for police, that would be perhaps the very worst thing to happen to government. It's almost like it is in the government's interest to perpetuate crime, increase crime, perpetrate crime or create crime. Perhaps by making more laws they actually create more crime and more need for more government and more laws. Maybe not.
@@eshootziscrs2868 You wasted your time writing this because you misunderstood his comment lol
@@eshootziscrs2868 Jesus you write no one is going to read through because you misunderstood. early in the video the channel owner states HE PAID money, and got the video footage but he got it competely blurred and unusable.
I'm not sure if your just deepthroating the whole boot or are an idiot( i didn't read All That). but at least watch the video before jumping into the comments lol
@@ivanb4681
Not nearly as much as you failed to comprehend the reply, simply put, a suit is not a solution and you are never really suing the individual or the state, you are always suing the people. That's where both entities get their income from and they won't go broke so you and I will pay. Do you get that?
Please, actually read before you respond even when it's a bit too much for you, otherwise why bother? Just looking for argument, feel necessary to criticize??? Really, why bother?
@@donniethezombie4495
Lmfao you hypocritical idiot, tells me to read right after saying I didn't read therefore have no idea what you said but you're wrong, lmfao.
Let's go Brandon, tell me you don't know what a woman is without telling me you don't know what a woman is.
What did the original comment say? Not what was said earlier in the video, I addressed the comment.
He said that a person should sue, I pointed out A: the suit is paid by the people not some individual. Second, the state will and can redact anything it wants, in fact some states will not even release public records without a court order and then will still redact everything they think they can.
The overall point is that this isn't the solution and it does not address the underlying root issues.
But of course unless you can read, comprehend and give perspective, you would never understand.
I know you really only replied because you wanted to criticize someone else to make yourself feel better and you lack attention so you seek arguments where you have no actual point or anything useful to add.
Still, I sincerely appreciate your time and effort taken to publicly display your willful ignorance and hypocrisy. Be well, stay safe
Cop never even entered the ticket? Definitely needs to be an internal affairs investigation on that
I think it is more common than most people realize. From my understanding, some cops think it is a waste of time to go to court over stuff like speeding or expired plates, so they write the ticket, and never put it in, assuming that you will just pay it, and never pipe up when your inside doesn't hike your rate. I got a speeding ticket that never showed up in any records a few years ago.
@@deamontana596 I got pulled over driving my friends car he was drunk in passenger seat. My license was suspended. Cop wrote me a ticket but then realized how drunk the owner of vehicle was and he threw the ticket away without saying anything. I went to pay it and the city had no record of the ticket. Pretty sure that cop tossed it out realizing I was only driving because the owner of vehicle was so drunk.
@@chaseomb9733 if he is doing financially unwell then he should make better choices.
@@scruffmcgruffthecrimedawg5661 Cool way to be man. Always obey the authority unless you can afford not to.
@@AutoMotoMechanic not always… I got arrested and my car impounded for driving on a suspended license that I didn’t know was suspended. My brother got a ticket in my car and it had temporary tags that I needed my inspection done by the end of the month. My dad is a mechanic and could do it for free that Saturday (they expired Thursday). Well without saying anything he got pulled over for speeding but the cop thought he did him a favor for the inspection ticket instead. I used my parents address for mail and stuff so since I lived in the city, my brother got the mail and tossed it all.
So I drove in the city for over a year with no issues , but the second I cross the county line I got pulled over and arrested and threatened. Because someone left a roach of k2 in the ashtray. They had to drop the possession because it wasn’t illegal. But my insulin needles were used to get me on “paraphernalia “. 😂 What a joke.
Then the cop is was supposed to turn my drivers license in to PennDOT but never did. So I served my suspension plus another year (so 2), paid $3000 in fines, court costs, and impound fees, did a year probation and then come to find out, I was still suspended and hadn’t received credit for any of it because the cop never sent my license to them!
I used to admire sheriff lamb but you're known by the associates that you keep and apparently if he thinks this guy is okay to be working for him sheriff lamb is a bigger piece of s*** than I thought
I know that road. He was doing 71 in a 45. There are stop lights every couple miles, speeding like that can cause serious accidents, I know I've seen it.
You don't seem to know much of anything. The uniformed thug took the radar speed of a Chrysler allegedly going 71 mph. Then the uniformed thug accosted a man driving a Genesis. That's neither the correct make or model of vehicle.
You are welcome.
@@Handle35667 Can you correctly ID every car passing you at 71 mph? He pulled the same car over that he clocked at 71 mph. It turns out it was a Genesis not a Chrysler. Minor, insignificant mistake.
@@rickharris5485 not the same car. Woops
@@Handle35667 Damn you must be a felon or something with this attitude. Or a college student at some liberal college, Kinda the same deal now adays...
me too, a couple of fatalities
Amazing how he wants it in a fast amount of time yet he will leave you sitting there as long as he feels like and ignor the law
Most states have it in their computers anyways and just because he does provide a paper copy, it could be invalid. The deputy could’ve also run his license in the meantime, he just wanted to stand there and be a dick.
@@climber950 Not defending the POS cop but you know vehicles can be stolen right
@@flooryy of course. That’s why a cop calls out the license plate before even exiting their patrol car so dispatch can advise them of that.
@@climber950 a stolen vehicle doesn't always instantly get reported as stolen so you still need to show your id and registration my man
@@flooryy forget stolen. dude was doing 26 miles over the speed limit. That's reckless driving in some states luckily for the driver it looks like Arizona isn't one of them cause I highly doubt this cop is the type to let a charge like that slide.
10 years ago or so, I was leaving Florida after spending a month staying there because there was no power where I lived in CT because of a freak October snowstorm. The FL state trooper asked for my License and I pulled out my wallet and I was like, Oh, my, I left it on my desk back in CT. He said to me: It's OK Paul (He already knew my name and what I looked at just from the license plate. He wrote me a ticket for doing 97 in a 70 and I went on my way. So pray tell, why do we even need to hand over a license if they know everything about us before they even come to the window?
Wait until electronic ID comes in. According to trucker friends of mine, their information pops up from their phone to the customs computer. They’ll be scanning your phones just driving around.
@@madtabby66 Electronic ID? You must be a career identity thief if you think that's a good idea, lol.
Because you could be driving someone else's car
Is that a true question?
Are you always in your own vehicle? You've never driven a rental car? What if you want to drive a friend's vehicle somewhere? What if you're a plumber who drives a utility van that is owned by your company?
Driver's in the wrong, he has a legal obligation to provide ID. I dont care that Frank is an asshat, the driver spouting "civil rights" after going more than 20 over the limit.
I am literally going through this right now. Arrested for failing to ID… charged with a traffic offense AFTER the court appearance. 😂
That's impossible.
@@orvil9223 should be... buuuuuut it's not
@@xmarine73 Failing to ID is a misdemeanor crime. A traffic ticket is a citation. Pretty aure he just had two different court dates because of two different types of charges. Some states do that.All my citations in one stop were in one court and my failure to stop for blue lights was in a different court.
What kind of nazi shithole charges people with a crime for not telling a cop their name???
@@orvil9223 I'm not sure why you're replying to me. I'm also not sure why you're assuming anything about the original commenters version of events.
He made it sound as if he had a traffic stop that he refused to ID up front on. They charged him with failure to ID and arrested him. Then they realized that failure to ID may not stick so they retaliated by making sure to ticket him for the traffic offense.
What does which court room he's in have to do with anything? That wasn't the point of what he's sharing...