AIDA's memory test has a tendency to hit the L3 cache during the "RAM tests" Also you can literally calculate max memory bandwidth. DDR5-4000 has a max bandwidth of 64GB/s. DDR5-6000 can't do more than 96GB/s
I'm still interested in how to get 2T command mode on am5 I can only get 2T GDM off at 3600CL30 but at 4600CL40 (my pb completely stable) its 1T with GDM on. I thought uneven secondary timings was the answer but it didn't work. Asus support didn't say whether it could be added to the BIOS when I asked
Well, a memory benchmark should be designed large enough to mitigate that. Could it be more like "intel has aida memory test optimizations in its prefetchers"? They do have a tendency to design for popular synthetics, where amd designs of real world use.
@@TommyApel I thought their petite boot was supposed to be comparable fast? At least that is what I heard for the Power 9 platform, and I would expect it is the same or better for newer ones.
@@Aegor1998 not really, IBX ThinkServers are by a long mile the slowest servers to boot that I've ever had the displeasure of working with, it was at the point where you started looking for your car keys to go to the datacenter before they came back online, next after those is HP which are also ungodly slow to get through post especially if you have raid controllers.
@@ChatGTA345 AM4 do the Same. I use 4000 128gb Kits and with two Sticks i get this Speed, But If i use 4 i get only 3400. This is normal ... Nothing new 🤷
3:00 I've experienced this on countless DDR4 boards in the last few years, _especially_ in the ITX space. Have to not only push down, but help it in place by pushing the latch closed.
@@derekp6636 Yeah the crunching sounds of the slot is always unsettling, and I build 8 or so systems a month. Unfortunately getting them backward is still a problem, since it's fairly easy to miss which way the key is oriented if you're not careful, and given how close the key position is between DDR4 and DDR5, it's also easy to think you've got the correct type of RAM when you may not, as well, so even more care is needed. I know they didn't really have room to move the key very far, but it would have been nice if DDR5 did differ a little more vs DDR4 in connector appearance. Would have saved one client who brought an in-progress build to me, since they tried shoving DDR4 into a DDR5 board and ruined the board. Luckily the RAM was undamaged.
@myselfremade yeah, would be nice, but they'd have to divide the data bus segments to do so, and for signal integrity reasons this was not done. A new PCB design that was either longer or shorter would have been the true ideal, solution, but alas, $ talks, so here we are.
Running a VFIO setup on Ryzen 7000 with the iGPU as my linux display out and 128GB. 4200 stable is the most I can get with my RAM (corsair non EXPO kit). The newest UEFI really helped stability with my MSI board. There's a long way to go. Thanks for putting in the work Wendall, keep fighting the good fight!
@@СузаннаСергеевна I haven't tried it myself, but I believe this is down to IOMMU groups, is it not? Curious what chipset you are running? I have heard that the 650 boards have awful iommu grouping that makes it impossible.
@@TheGreatSpiff X670E ProArt. The IOMMU groups are actually great, everything I can imagine wanting to split apart is split apart. The iGPU is in an IOMMU group it shares with some audio device I'm assuming is HDMI audio. As it is I can boot a VM and detect the iGPU as an AMD GPU, but the driver refuses to bind to it no matter what I do.
Gskill's SKU makes sense and instantly tells you a lot about the product. F5 means DDR5, 6000 is the rated speed. 3040 is the first two cas latencies of 30 and 40 32gx2 tells me that it is 2 stick of 32 GB stick Tz5n means it is trident z with Expo profieles where as TZ5 whithout N means it is XMP profiles. The lack of a K or S means it only comes in one color way
Jesus Christ why do I need to know that in the SKU name? Should AMD rename their 7950x to 7950x16 in order to tell you that it has 16 cores? If the product name can tell you what chip the ram is actually using, that would be much appreciated because Amazon or Newegg pages pretty much never state that.
@@Sebyllis7350k that is too much information to shorten further. And every bit is relevant. If you only care about the speed and capacity, just search for those. For guys like me, knowing that actually helps alot. I'll always remember what Maheer said now.
Good thing I bought a single dual stick kit of 64gb 6000mhz for my steel legend, as opposed to two. Phew. Thank you Wendell, answering a burning question I've had for the last few days. ❤️
Has any changed regarding this matter? Has there been a bios update that makes it possible? Is there a new mem controller on the 9000 series that make 128 GB at 6000MHZ possible?
I'm hoping that Zen 4 with 3D cache will, as the 5800X3D did, ameliorate the performance impact of slower memory, and thus allow for highly performant quad rank setups.
If AMD isn‘t releasing a 16-core 3D SKU this time around I‘ll be pretty pissed myself. Remember that 5900X3D sample Lisa Su was holding into the camera over a year ago? Let‘s hope Intel can put the competition pressure back to AMD so AMD stops acting all Intelly circa 2013. :(
Honestly I would get a 3D Vcache version if that means I can run slower ECC ram since you could get the best of both worlds: good stability and good performance.
3D Vcache would even help out a bit with power consumption since main system memory can be accessed less and clocked lower making the whole platform more attractive. Fuck the responsible product managers.
You don't need 7950x3d. It's a productivity chip. It already isn't that great for gaming so the cache wouldn't be that helpful. The only chip that makes sense for gaming in a practical sense is the 7800x3d. If you do work just get the 7950x as the 3d version isn't going to be any better. The productivity applications won't benefit from the cache. If AMD even makes one it won't be anytime soon.
It is not wise to project your own computing demands on other people. Not everything revolves around gaming and there is a reason AMD released a few Milan-X SKUs but only a Ryzen fig leaf. And that reason isn’t that AMD is looking out for its lower tier consumer platform wanting to help customers not accidentally buying a 3D CPU that’s a bit more expensive than the non-3D counterpart.
you just saved my sanity with this video... as it has been a few years since i last built a machine, i would never have expected the limitations we currently face with 4 DIMMs. 10minute Boot times? No freaking way... but yet, here we are. Got my 128GB to run at 3800MHz, will have to see if its stable though.
Wonderful presentation. This is the first video of yours I've watched and it is a breath of fresh air. I've seen way too many channels where the speaker has no script, has not idea what they will say, and half of their presentation is them correcting themselves or not saying anything at all.
Thank you for this exact video. I was just about to put together a 7950x ASUS Hero X670 and 128g of trident Z Neo just like this for a new workstation. I'm glad i'm holding off. My 5950x is running 128g nicely and i'll just wait a good while
@@DerekDavis213 AVID media Composer. it uses most of it. Use lots of single core application that preferer high clock speed instead of threadripper. My 4090 does more workhorse than the 5950x :)
@@nathanlowery1141 An recent nvme ssd can read and write at 7000 megabytes/sec. An Intel Optane drive has very high performance, for smaller queue depths. How much faster could a RAM disk be?
The content I have been waiting for. I always want to see how far can these platforms go with extreme memory size. Finger cross and see if Buildzoid will also test 128GB on AM5.
this video needs an update. AMD a couple months ago released a bios update that improved multiple ram related things (like allowing 7000s series to run 6400MTs ram at 1:1:1)
I'm currently running 128gb DDR5 at 4600mt/s with my 7950x. They are two 2x32gb kits of corsair CMK64GX5M2B5200Z40 (5200 mts c40). Those kits were pretty cheap compared to most lately and probably still are today. That's the max I was able to run them on both an Asus proart creator wifi x670e board and an asus prime x670e pro wifi board. Both running at docp profile 1 and setting the target frequency to 4600 (no other tinkering, using the latest bios which you do need to update!). Above that it won't boot. Not officially supported but I think its the most bang for the buck 128gb configuration I could find. Hopefully this info can help some people. Maybe I could manually OC to squeeze a bit more but I've read of instability issues so I don't bother with it. I might upgrade in the future when true 4 stick kits become supported, available and affordable. Imo buying more expensive ram than my config is just not worth it as it's pretty clear something much better will come along eventually and you're gonna need to upgrade anyway, even if you splurge for the higher end ones now. I kinda also doubt the current kits will get that much better support through bios updates as many manual OCers have tried their best to push them to their limits in 128gb configurations with no success. I don't think a docp profile that actually can get them to their rated max speed is even possible. Thanks for this great video. Wish this video was available when I made my build, it would've saved me a ton of digging in forum, trial and error buying the wrong things, and tinkering around in the settings. I'm sure it'll help out a lot of people. Ps: my boot times are very fast now, once the first boot was completed. The memory training time on first boot is always very long, and annoying since you never know if it will eventually succeed or not. If you follow my config you should have no problem matching my results easily and get a very usable working 128gb setup at a somewhat decent speed. Cheers y'all! Pps: heard the expo version of my kits currently have a bunch of issues, my local shop has stopped carrying them. I recommend you get the regular xmp version like me.
I had 32gb ram and I double to 4 sticks so 64gb pc was stable for days speed was 5200mhzt then got a blue screen heard if u reduce the speed should be fine, so I reduce by 200mhzt running at 5000mhzt gonna see if it works, but two sticks even at 6000mhzt is fine.
I was running 2x32 blades of Vengeance CL32 6400Gbz at 6000Ghz with no issues. Today added 2 extra blades and my hell started. Updated the Bios before installing them. Got them recognized at bios, boot, and no POST or windows Anymore. I was only able to see the bios again removing PHYSICALLY the 2 new blades. So i see the BIOS, was able to down the speed to 4000Mhz, put the blades again, and finally it boots. (But it took me some hours in the process of trial and error. And Having to remove the blades each time to see the bios is a nightmare. Now i am running 128Gb at 4000Ghz. Gonna re-read your post and try to squeeze more of it.
Wish I saw this video first before buying 2 pairs of Corsair Vengence 5200mhz kits for 128gb total. Luckily I didn't buy high end ones, which would have wasted the chip speeds. On my MSI PRO X670-P WIFI with 7950x I was able to get a stable 4600mhz - it passed two PassMark memory test runs. 4800mhz posts and boots, but fails memory test. 5000 and over does not post and need a CMOS reset (or take out two of the chips to boot and change bios settings)
@@Bayonet1809 Having to shell out 2k+ $ just to get more PCIe lanes is moronic. We have multiple PCIe slots but can realistically only use 1 maybe 2 of them. Worst thing is that it's kind of blatant what they are doing when only giving us 24-28 lanes.
@@Yock1980 I like how Asus does the PCIe setup on their WS X570 ACE board, it really helps out in terms of expanded PCIe capabilities (at the cost of some extra latency I'm sure)
I had similar issues getting just 64GB of DDR4 4000Mhz running even XMP on my x570-ryzen 9 5950x setup. I eventually got all 4x dimms running at 3733mhz with an fclk of 1866 but it was a pain in the ass with a lot of testing and restarts and instability.
The video is interesting, this “next room approach” is actually practical in most homes. I used to think that water cooling was a necessity for a Silent Gaming PC / Workstation until I tried positive air pressure (inside the case). With positive air pressure and enough high-quality fans in the proper orientation and a good enough case you can enjoy a silent PC with near water cooling temps (less than 60 Celsius under load). I use Arctic 120mm fans, they won’t go above 1000rpm often, and they are not expensive like Noctua fans. In my personal experience the Best orientation for air is top to bottom with PSU fan facing inside the case (as exhaust fan), and front to back with a WS case (with 3 front fans). Even blower style GPUs get cooled efficiently because of the fresh air being pushed / moved constantly inside the case. The key is to have more / faster intake fans, and less / slower exhaust fans, and not to have conflicting / opposing airflow; this way the air moves quickly and the fans don’t have to spin up to higher RPMs.
Recently I built a 7950 system (Asus x670e ROG Crosshair Extreme) for a deep pockets client. He ordered 128gb of Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 5200. With all 4 sticks, it would never run more than 3600mt/s, and took 20+ minutes to train/post. With just two sticks, it would hit 4800mt/s (still not the 5200 advertised), and enabling manual DOCP would refuse to post even after an hour of training. We were both a bit confused and upset. He currently decided to stick to the 64gb.
"still not the 5200 advertised" Cause NONE of the memory those brands sold is official DDR5 5200/6000/whatever. They are all overclocked, way different timings, way higher voltage/power. Right now we are just seeing the first few JEDEC 5600 kits arriving, 5200 for a bit longer - but JEDEC 5200 means 38 CAS and 1.1V. But most memory that you can get is glorified overclocked DDR5 4000-4800.
@@ABaumstumpf I understand that JEDEC is all that's guaranteed. However, they advertise DOCP at 5200, and the set was on the QVL for the mainboard, so in theory it should work, and was advertised to do so.
I have the XMP version (F5-6000J3040G32GX2-TZ5RK) and 7950x. Was hoping to upgrade to 128GB down the road. Hopefully future AM5 CPUs will have a better IMC to support DDR5 6000 with 4 DIMMs.
Aw awesome! I was just looking for advice about this topic yesterday. I can't believe with the newness and pricing of AM5 motherboards, the IMC is such a problem. For now I'm going to go with a B650 (why 670 with the same iffy IMC?) and only 64GB. Sadly, going to Intel for 128GB seems to not really bring much benefit. Ya, I'm poking at you Intel also.
I have to give you some praise on your camera quality and your lighting!! Watching on a QD-OLED is amazing! I wish more youtubers would step up the game! Great job!
Thanks for addressing the 13900K since that would have been the next question. It can't remember a time when the memory technology was that far ahead of the memory-controller technology and this is Intel's 2nd round.
2:20 oh god so when i'm putting ddr4 modules and they fight me so much that i'm afraid that i'll snap the board in half with how much it's bending, with ddr5 i just won't be able to install any in the first place without breaking the board in half immediately?
They really should reinforce the RAM slots and make it so RAM sticks can properly insert themselves into the slot without having some janky thing where it doesn't fully click into place. When inserting RAM you're putting a lot of pressure on the slot and RAM sticks, which feels like it's gonna break.
Even on generations before, inserting RAM could be feeling pretty sketchy sometimes - so hearing this about DDR5 has me a little worried lol. But I'm sure manufacturers will figure it out sooner or later, just how they'll have to figure out more resilient PCIe slots.
For AM4 boards I only had troubles with ASRock, never issues with other brands. I had a b350 fatality with a 1700, and a b450 fatality with a 3600. Both motherboards wouldn't go over 2800mhz ram with 3600mhz sticks. Then I grabbed a b450 Asus board and put the Ryzen 5 3600 in it, and the ram will OC to 3800mhz with same timings as 3600mhz.
I bought used B350 motherboard with 1700x, that had pretty old bios and 2666mhz Adata 4x4gb kit. I could not make it run at 2666. 2400 had stability problems and only 2133 worked fine. After bios update it could easily run 2666 and then when I upgraded to 3200Mhz kit it also run fine at 3200Mhz without any issues, so a lot of memory problems on first ryzens was solved by bios updates. I also think that memory manufacturers had to learn "AMD" again after being abandoned for a while. It was a lesson for both - motherboard and ram manufacturers to get back into AMD and make some compatibility tuning. I don't know how it was before, but now I even do not have to tune the Infinity Fabric. It always automatically sets itself to 1:1 ratio with memory.
The bandwidth speeds you mention do sound so low. Are these single core bandwidth or is that the real limit of the full multi core bandwidth of the chips. I am sitting here with an M1 Max MBP im thinking my single core bandwidth is 2x that let along the multi core bandwidth.
Finally. Thank you for all you work and such helpful explanation of the topic. I fought for a day trying to make memory run at least at 4000. But apparently i should not.
Ahh this sucks. I was hoping to upgrade to a 7x00X3D system with AVX512 and 128GB 6000 ram. But that looks unlikely now. What do we know about the ecc capabilities of ddr5? Is it any good?
My experience with modern DDR4 and DDR5 has been a pick one of two. 1). Lots of RAM at lower speed and higher latency. 2.) Some RAM at high speed and low latency.
I built my new rig in October with a 7950x and 4090, I have 4 x 16gb DDR5 6000mhz RAM, it's the Kingston Beast EXpo Ram. I have been having very slow booting and occasionally (once a week or so) it won't boot at all and requires a CMOS clear to get into Windows. The machine is an absolute beast when in Windows and running well and it holds 6000mhz without stability problems but these little annoyances with booting etc do get old very quickly, for example my old AM4 system booted into Windows in less than 5 seconds, I'm closer to 45 secs to 1 min with the new machine. I wasn't aware that 4 DIMMS could cause an issue with X670, wish I'd gone with 2 x 32gb kit now. I will try to remove a couple DIMMS and do some testing, see if the boot times and stability improves, thanks a lot for bringing this to light, not a lot of people are covering these topics
8:00 "It was clocking faster on Ryzen 1000 and 2000 series..." Nope, you are mistaking on that. I owned a 1700x and never was able to clock my memory above 2900MHz on the first AGESA BIOS update. It was fixed after around a years. Same thing will happens as AGESA update are going to drop.
Thank you for this. I just did a rebuild with AM5 7950x on an ASUS Proart x670e board. I am doing a lot of heavy video file editing in Davinci and was clued into having more memory capacity is key to smooth experience when rendering frames during editing. Like 12bit raw 4-8k footage. Anyways I wanted to get 128gb running and ASUS kept telling me it’ll only be stable with 2 of the 4 slots filled or I have to go with a 4 stick kit they recommended Kingston fury so I’m running that kit now but it’s xmp ready for Intel. I’m getting speeds of 3600 instead of the 5600 it’s rated for. Any attempt to push that memory faster leads to instability and safe mode booting. I’m not sure if this will be fixed later with newer bios as we go along with the platform. Or. Do you think there will be 2x64gb kits out there I should look into in order to free up those two slots? As of right now I’ve never had video editing run this smooth it’s awesome but it kinda eats at me to be leaving some performance somewhere on the table … Appreciate your help your channel and your time 🙏
Some people have told me that they could get the 5600 Trident Z kits to run 128GB stable by first letting the board and CPU memory train with 64GB, and then later filling in the rest of the 128GB and manually setting the speed to 5600 with auto on voltage. This was apparently with a Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master board. The kits they were talking about were the ones without EXPO, but labeled as Hynix within the Aorus Master's own QVL list page.
Gone through the same pain with 4x 2R DDR4 sticks on dual channel platforms. I think high end consumer is long overdue getting an upgrade to memory channel support and should go where low end HEDT platform was.
I recently built a new computer with a Ryzen 7 5700X on an ASUS B450M motherboard with two identical G. Skill DDR4-3200 32GB kits and ran into the same thing. The spec says 2933MHz maximum for four sticks of DDR4. I was able to get the system stable at 3000MHz, but some of the memory timings had to be set very loose, and it took alot of tuning to even get the 3000MHz going stable. At 3200MHz the system would absolutely have tons of memory errors, regardless of timings, and sometimes would not even POST. I'm guessing DDR5 is even more finicky due to the significantly higher clock speeds. Thanks for the video. You've confirmed what I though was the case here with my computer: The memory controller is simply not up to the task of being overclocked with four sticks of RAM, even single rank.
I ran 4X16 GB of DDR5 at 6000 mts for 13 months, (7800X3D, X670E steel legend, automatic EXPO) no problem. Until suddenly, one day, I started getting random BSODs or a frozen, unresponsive system. I don't know what fucked it up. Maybe a windows update. I am currently running them at 5200 with good timings, and that seemed to stop the random crashes. I am getting a 2X48 DDR5 kit next. Four dimms in AM5 is a bad idea and I did not know it at the time.
thans for making this vid. very informative. When i decide to build my system I'll be stikking with 64gb as for me the 7900 only igpu is enough same motherboard
It should be able to address 1TB total. Expecting it to be any faster than junk in the first implementation when they should have been making some kind of high-speed HBM3 module and socket system is idiocy.
@@jamescarter9147 Luckily I studied this bit more and went with 2x48GB, at the time I was also considering Intel CPU as there memory works better, but in the light of recent news, good that I did not ;)
I'm shocked its working, but I'm running a 2x16GB kit of G.Skill DDR5-6000 CL30 in the A channel and a 2x16GB kit of G.Skill DDR5-6000 CL32 in the B channel with a 7900x. With EXPO set its actually running all 4 DIMMS at 6000 CL30. Its passed the stress tests I've tried and I've been using it for almost a week now without any problems.
Check your actual bandwidth, though. I've got four sticks of 2x32GB-5800 running stable at 6000, but the actual bandwidth isn't much better than running them at 4000, which is probably because the fabric downclocks to relieve the memory controller. Worse, because of whatever is happening in the background, my cache performance also suffers. Depending on your workload you may not actually benefit from running the memory at those speeds.
Be sure to reference the DDR5 spec when talking about this. Section 10 talks about the speed bins and what you should be seeing, all the way up to DDR5-8400.
Hello, I have a question that I hope you can give me a short answer to. have tried to find an answer without success. I have always used the same 4 pcs. 4GB memory chips 16GB. (CORSAIR VENGEANCE BLUE 1600MHz 4GB 9-9-9-24 1.50V) With an Asus sabertooth 990fx and AMD FX8350 It worked fine for many years until I installed win11. Then I started getting a blue screen. It took approx. 1 week between when it happened. After a lot of troubleshooting and testing with other memory chips, I found that only the first 2 memory chip slots worked. I came to the conclusion that it was the memory controller in the processor CPU. which was destroyed. Since this is not a new CPU, I managed to buy it used and cheap and had my theory confirmed. In the meantime before I bought a new CPU. then I built another computer from parts I had. A computer that was not quite complete. same year and actually the same system AM3+ but a different motherboard from the same year (Gigabyte GA-870A-UD3 v1.2) a typical gaming motherboard from that era. The strange thing was that the 4 of these memory chips I had did not work and my computer would not work. Then I took out one memory stick and replaced it with another memory stick (Corsair Dominator 1333MHz 4 GB 1.65V 9-9-9-24 XMP) and set memory chips in bios to 1600MHz and timing manually 9-9-9-24. it has so far worked perfectly without any errors. My question is as follows. 1. Why did I have to replace one memory stick with another to make my computer work? Do you have any theory on this? After testing, I know that all 4 pcs. stick works without problems. 2. I tried some Overclocking programs in win 11 which were unstable and destroyed another set of 4 pcs. memory stick, that's what I think was the cause. I hadn't even set anything in the programs since they crashed. Can such a program destroy a memory stick? Do you have experience or a theory?
what about 4x48GB ram DDR5 5600 ? ... i want to build a new machine based on 9950x and x870e or 670e for Houdini / C4D and i cant find a 4x64 GB=256 gb ram kit, but i find only 192GB kit.
This doesn't sound great compared to DDR4... I am currently on AM4 with 128GB of DDR4-3600 memory, and in AIDA64 I get a read bandwidth of 53000 MB/s and a Latency of 77 ns. It sounds like DDR5 wouldn't be any better at all?
Same here. 5950X with 128GB 3600 CL16 works absolutely fine. Wont boot at all with 3800 even with a single stick but that 3600 is rockstable. Seems like one has to wait for the 8xxx Series AM5 Chips for better Performance with 4 DIMMs.
hmm I hard disagree on testing with memtest86 - it's OKAY to spot complete faults but as for stability naah gotta stress in windows. corrupting the install can happen though that's true.
And/or use one of AMD’s feature advantages of not disabling ECC by default and use a motherboard and memory with ECC support. Have many AM4 systems with 128 GB of ECC memory and no issues with DDR4-3200.
I would LOVE to see this video for the Z690 or Z790 platform with the new 13th gen processors. I cannot, for the life of me, find a comprehensive overview of what one can expect on those platforms with 4DIMM configurations.
Thanks for this coverage. The main reason I haven't upgraded to a new platform is I want reasonable speeds at 128GB. Had been leaning towards Intel DDR4 since there are several motherboards that have QVL 128GB at 3600.
@@penguinbelly For me at least it's a lot of software development work, which needs surprisingly quite a bit of RAM, incl all the browser tabs and microservices spread among multiple projects
@@penguinbelly workstations for rendering and power users with home/small businesses servers (video, XFS, etc). I can’t see why you’d need it for gaming or most other applications.
I think 128GB support needs time to mature. In the end we're talking about consumer boards and board manufacturers will test RAM and optimize UEFI settings for the memory configurations which are around the sweetspot for consumers, so 16GB or 32GB in total. And Intel has the 2nd gen CPUs with DDR5, so it can be assumed that they have improved the IMC in Raptor Lake compared to Alder Lake. If I remember correctly, early adopters had also issues with DDR5 compatibility. So let's wait and see what AGESA and UEFI updates bring in the future.
@@thepopeofkeke this cannot be true unfortunately, I suspect your settings are unstable. Even 13900K cannot run 128GB stable greater than 4200ish, all manufacturers tried and failed at it
Actually it's companies forcing us to upgrade to workstation systems so that they get more money. Absolutely awful that I can't use 128gb ram in am5 motherboard at desired RAM speed.
I have a Crosshair X670E and it's a heap of crap. Slow to get BIOS updates, and when they finally bother, they're unstable or cause more issues than they solve. My machine still tries to do memory training eithe every or every other boot leading to 40s - 2 minute POST times. Tied different RAM at stock, DOCP, manual settings, the board just sucks
I bought the G.SKILL 64GB 2x32 6000 CL32-38-38-96 1.40v. And have been wondering if i've made a mistake not getting the CL-30-40-40-96 one. Or are they pretty much the same. Can anyone tell me?
Remembering first generation Threadripper, and it was almost a year before we had good bedded down memory. Starting from a better place this time, but still a long way to go.
Wonderful video. The following are 2 - 4x 32gb ddr5 memory kits that are on Amazon : SABRENT Rocket DDR5 128GB U-DIMM 4800MHz Memory Kit (4x32GB) for Desktops and PCs (SB-DR5U-32GX4) this kit is $799.96 and A-Tech 128GB (4x32GB) DDR5 4800 MHz UDIMM PC5-38400 CL40 DIMM 288-Pin 2Rx8 1.1V Desktop RAM Memory Modules - this kit is $679.99. Maybe having 4 matched dimms might do a little better. I have 128gb on my current system ( AM4 ) build. At the time I put this together all of the parts were the best for there respective class - since then newer updated parts have replaced my parts as the best. The RX 6900xt was the best gpu class for gpu's from AMD now there is the RX XX50 replacements. Maybe the lack of a central memory controller might be a part of the issues at the moment.
thanks for this I want only 64GB but fining it hard to get 2x 32GB so was thinking of getting 4x16GB but after this Ill stick it out till a 64gb set is in stock thank you
Not sure If this relates: I have a lenovo legion 5, 4800h laptop with 64gb of ram (i know not the same as am5 at all but stick with me). For the longest time I thought my sticks were bad because I would get memory corruption. It was actually something to do with the IGPU and switching between Linux and windows. Something was not getting reset! If I went from Linux to windows I would get BSoD.....then memtest would show issues too. My theory is that between boots the igpu was still holding onto some of the system memory....it wasn't being properly released. Enabling/disabling the igpu....different Linux distros....different ways of rebooting (doing an actual power off vs rebooting) all yielded different results in memory stability.
I’d hate to see how tedious higher capacities would be since 256GB is technically possible with DDR5. Haven’t even seen any 64GB DDR5 UDIMMs outside of the server space yet…
For reference I just used this to get 2 Corsair 64Gb ( 2 x 32 ) up and running at 6000-30-36-36-76, I am yet to stability test and I was booting into linux.
I am running 7950X3D over Rog Crosshair Hero X670E Motherboard with 32GB * 4 (128 GB) of memory from GSkill (Neo Z5 ARGB 6000 MHz). Highest memory clock i am able to run stable is 4000 MHz. Anything beyond is guaranteed to cause C5 error
I have 4x16GB running at 6000 MT/s CL36 on my 7950X. it's actually 6200 MT/s ram, but i downclocked using Memory Try It for better overall timings, and auto:1:1. I did have to lock uclk:memclock to 1:1 in the bios manually. I did use memory that MSI listed as QVL'ed for four sticks. (MSI x670-P Pro Wifi)
Yeah, it seems like 4 stick combinations are much easier with 16gb rather than 32. Glad its working out for you! Not sure how 2x32 compares to 4x16 tho
The IMC is underbuilt for that much work, the good thing is it is in the IO die,so a simple revision of that would suffice to improve things, no need to fiddle with the core chiplet whatsoever. Remember, zen was and pretty much still is a server design adapted for other use.
My two configurations are 2x2x16GB Kingston FURY 6000MT/s CL 36 with EXPO, so total 64GB, they run without any problem with the EXPO setting at 6000MHz on a Asus x670e Hero mainboard. Then my 128 GB configuration is 2x2x32GB G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo. They run when I set EXPO II at DDR5-6000 30-40... but then I have to set the Memory Frequency to DDR-4800, EXPO I is not stable but EXPO II is running my applications mostly without problems. With 4x 32GB I get Memory Read=62007MB/s Write 70202 MB/s Copy 61156 MB/s latency 96.8. I'll have to check that also with the 4x16GB what should be much faster.
im still on launch day 1800x and i remember the day going to get it, and the next few weeks on forums lol. im still rocking the 1800x, 1080ti STRIX, TridentZ 2 x 16GB 3200 16-16-16-36 had the ram timings tighter for a few years, now back to stock, C6H. it running games fine/ok lol always want more right?! back then and to date iv said im gonna upgrade this system around about 2025 now to wait. i also have custom water setup so not wanting to upgrade every 2-3 years. im ok with the long haul i just try to build with the best parts out at the time and run the system for many years or until its not doing what i want it to.
at the time of writing the non RGB version that has a 10,67ns true latency instead of the 10,00 is arround 74 euro cheaper. that's almost 80 usd price diff. G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB F5-6000J3040G32GX2-TZ5NR vs G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo F5-6000J3238G32GX2-TZ5N when buying 2 kits that's a lot of money .. i don't know if i need that much mem right away.. perhaps in a few years when prices drop.. never plugged in more mem later on in a build.. am i correct in assuming i need to get at least the same latency and speed and be ok ??????
Where are the problems with 4 DDR5 coming from? Is it something which can be fixed in future by a BIOS update by AMD and/or by motherboard manufacturers? When the motherboard manufacturer offers 4 DIMM slots for DDR5, and it is not really possible (at least not now?), is it not a reason to give the motherboard back or get a price reduction, when I already bought it, but want to keep it? Is there a size limitation per DIMM? So could a DIMM bigger than 32 GB be a solution? So 2x64GB could be possible and a solution for the future? What is the maximum DIMM DDR5 size, which current system support? Same problems on "the other side"? How is it going on Intel side with 4x DDR5?
I guess I got _really_ lucky, then. I'm running two 2x32GB-5800 kits on my 7950X and they'll even overclock to 6200 (well, momentarily, I invariably crash before my overclocking live USB gets to KDE). I have been running it at 6000 with conservative timings since I put the system together, though, and it's been remarkably stable (no errors in over 24 hours of memtest86). iGPU also works fine (though I still haven't been able to pass it through to a VM...) Booting is ridiculously slow of course (about fifteen minutes, thankfully I hardly ever turn my computers off), which is why I've been restraining myself from trying to improve the settings. Measured bandwidth varies wildly from boot to boot, mostly some flavour of poor, but I do sometimes get good performance. If I wanted speed more than capacity I'd be better off running a single kit, having both kits in at once definitely kicks the memory controller into some fallback mode where performance plummets so in terms of actual bandwidth I rarely get over 90GB/s, and worse, it actually does hurt my L3 performance quite severely (I've seen it go as low as 800GB/s, but mostly it hovers around 1500-1700), but it is still technically four sticks running at 6000, and going down to 3600 or so to not hurt the L3 will benchmark worse. This isn't EXPO RAM, though, and I am running it at a very high voltage. Running a single kit at a time lets me push much higher clocks and bandwidths, so it may simply be a matter of winning the silicon lottery five times in a row (memory controller and all four memory modules). I'm eagerly awaiting new BIOSes that may reduce boot times a bit, I suspect that running all four DIMMs does bad things to the infinity fabric, which decoupling fabric base clock from CPU base clock may help resolve, but when it takes twenty minutes to check each change I make I simply don't have the time. Even if all this capacity does hurt cache and processor performance (and it certainly does, I just cba to find out how badly yet), it's still less bad than swapping to disk would be. I've been pleasantly surprised with AMD this generation, and my expectations were already pretty high. On my 12900K these same memory kits, even alone, couldn't boot on XMP. The best I could get out of them was 5600. At least the timings were good. Normally I'd expect Intel to overclock memory better even though AMD is more dependent on high memory clocks, but here my experience has been that Intel can't overclock at all while AMD performs miracles. That said, 90GB/s on DDR5 is pretty unimpressive when I was hitting 100+GB/s on DDR4 several years ago. A last generation Threadripper would get me much more capacity at comparable bandwidth, and it could even be ECC without an awful lot of bother. The extra cores mostly compensate for the loss of per core performance. I really think two DIMMs per channel ought to die. Either give us four channels outright, or make motherboards with only two slots. As it is those few of us who do benefit from running four DIMMs in a computer should just pay the EPYC tax and get a proper workstation instead. Much higher capacity. ECC. IPMI. A sensible amount of PCIe lanes instead of the utterly inadequate pittance they deign to throw us filthy plebeians.
@@СузаннаСергеевна Wait, so you are running 4x32B DIMMs at 6000MHz, fully stable? Could you please say what exact RAM kit part number you used and on what motherboard?
im on an asrock pg riptide m-atx with a ryzen 7950x and it cant handle 2x 16gb ddr5 corsair 5600. Always errors, bsod. I take out one stick, so its only running one stick of 16bg and its fine. I swap sticks, fine. I try the single stick in any slot, fine. put two sticks back in, problems. I know this isnt a help forum but if anyone reads this would be great to know a fix
Thank God for corsair they're dropping 4 dimm kits just got a 4 dimm kit of 6600mhz at 32-34-34 76 also only 91gb/s? My intel platform is pushing over 100gb/s currently with the previously mentioned 4 dimm set closer to 107 with an overclock but I'm uncomfortable with how high I have to have the voltages to maintain stability... also having the igpu enabled causes stability issues with my Intel platform
My asus x670e gene has been a champ. Boot times are slow but i honestly dont mind. I turned on the auto memory thing that checks timings every boot on purpose. Which is weird because "disabled" means enabled and "enabled" means its disabled. Out of the box it was on enabled meaning auto memory was off. Thus first time I booted it was just like am4, instant on.... But i like the feature to check timings and make sure its running right, so I "disabled" the thing in the bios which enabled the longer boot time.
AIDA's memory test has a tendency to hit the L3 cache during the "RAM tests"
Also you can literally calculate max memory bandwidth. DDR5-4000 has a max bandwidth of 64GB/s. DDR5-6000 can't do more than 96GB/s
Yes, I should have mentioned that.
Buildzoid , I love it when you drop in with some fresh knowledge nuggets on other vids.
I'm still interested in how to get 2T command mode on am5 I can only get 2T GDM off at 3600CL30 but at 4600CL40 (my pb completely stable) its 1T with GDM on. I thought uneven secondary timings was the answer but it didn't work. Asus support didn't say whether it could be added to the BIOS when I asked
Well, a memory benchmark should be designed large enough to mitigate that. Could it be more like "intel has aida memory test optimizations in its prefetchers"? They do have a tendency to design for popular synthetics, where amd designs of real world use.
@@dgo4490 actually right now AIDA is most inaccurate on AMD. The infinity fabric at 2GHz should have a max bandwidth of 64GB/s.
Amazing, now server-grade boot times are a reality for desktop.
for the first time in decades IBM now has competition for 1st place as the slowest systems to boot..... "great"
@@TommyApel I thought their petite boot was supposed to be comparable fast? At least that is what I heard for the Power 9 platform, and I would expect it is the same or better for newer ones.
@Andrew Crews 5 to 10 minutes? That's Windows-XP-on-a-Dell levels of slow booting
@@Aegor1998 not really, IBX ThinkServers are by a long mile the slowest servers to boot that I've ever had the displeasure of working with, it was at the point where you started looking for your car keys to go to the datacenter before they came back online, next after those is HP which are also ungodly slow to get through post especially if you have raid controllers.
That's memory training boot time. It's less than 30 seconds from button to windows once its trained. Still not fast but its not bad
GLAD someone is talking about this! There are a lot people wondering why their 4 slot memory config can't run DDR5-6000 on AM5.
And not just for AMD!
AM4 do the Same. Its normal.
@@NetrunnerAT That said 128GB 3600 DDR4 was running very well, unlike the new DDR5-6000 "sweet spot"
@@ChatGTA345 AM4 do the Same. I use 4000 128gb Kits and with two Sticks i get this Speed, But If i use 4 i get only 3400. This is normal ... Nothing new 🤷
@@NetrunnerAT Yeah I'm not arguing, just noting that I ran 3600 with AM4 and that was rock solid and top-tier performance, unlike with AM5 or Z790.
3:00 I've experienced this on countless DDR4 boards in the last few years, _especially_ in the ITX space. Have to not only push down, but help it in place by pushing the latch closed.
same. went small board this time and had to reseat the ram because it wouldnt post even though it "clicked."
i HATE it ... makes me feel like i'm going to break the board/chip and I double check the orientation at least 3 times
@@derekp6636 Yeah the crunching sounds of the slot is always unsettling, and I build 8 or so systems a month. Unfortunately getting them backward is still a problem, since it's fairly easy to miss which way the key is oriented if you're not careful, and given how close the key position is between DDR4 and DDR5, it's also easy to think you've got the correct type of RAM when you may not, as well, so even more care is needed. I know they didn't really have room to move the key very far, but it would have been nice if DDR5 did differ a little more vs DDR4 in connector appearance. Would have saved one client who brought an in-progress build to me, since they tried shoving DDR4 into a DDR5 board and ruined the board. Luckily the RAM was undamaged.
@myselfremade yeah, would be nice, but they'd have to divide the data bus segments to do so, and for signal integrity reasons this was not done. A new PCB design that was either longer or shorter would have been the true ideal, solution, but alas, $ talks, so here we are.
@Andrew Crews Rambus dram flashbacks...
Running a VFIO setup on Ryzen 7000 with the iGPU as my linux display out and 128GB. 4200 stable is the most I can get with my RAM (corsair non EXPO kit). The newest UEFI really helped stability with my MSI board. There's a long way to go. Thanks for putting in the work Wendall, keep fighting the good fight!
Have you tried passing the iGPU through? I've been trying since I got my processor and gotten absolutely nowhere.
@@СузаннаСергеевна I haven't tried it myself, but I believe this is down to IOMMU groups, is it not? Curious what chipset you are running? I have heard that the 650 boards have awful iommu grouping that makes it impossible.
@@TheGreatSpiff X670E ProArt. The IOMMU groups are actually great, everything I can imagine wanting to split apart is split apart. The iGPU is in an IOMMU group it shares with some audio device I'm assuming is HDMI audio.
As it is I can boot a VM and detect the iGPU as an AMD GPU, but the driver refuses to bind to it no matter what I do.
has difficulty hitting 4800？ add voltage to mc to see if that help.
@@СузаннаСергеевна no I have not
Gskill's SKU makes sense and instantly tells you a lot about the product. F5 means DDR5, 6000 is the rated speed. 3040 is the first two cas latencies of 30 and 40 32gx2 tells me that it is 2 stick of 32 GB stick Tz5n means it is trident z with Expo profieles where as TZ5 whithout N means it is XMP profiles. The lack of a K or S means it only comes in one color way
Jesus Christ why do I need to know that in the SKU name? Should AMD rename their 7950x to 7950x16 in order to tell you that it has 16 cores? If the product name can tell you what chip the ram is actually using, that would be much appreciated because Amazon or Newegg pages pretty much never state that.
@@Sebyllis7350k that is too much information to shorten further. And every bit is relevant. If you only care about the speed and capacity, just search for those. For guys like me, knowing that actually helps alot. I'll always remember what Maheer said now.
@@fistan5447 Agreed! One string to rule them all. Thank you @MaheerKibria!
Good thing I bought a single dual stick kit of 64gb 6000mhz for my steel legend, as opposed to two.
Phew. Thank you Wendell, answering a burning question I've had for the last few days. ❤️
Has any changed regarding this matter? Has there been a bios update that makes it possible? Is there a new mem controller on the 9000 series that make 128 GB at 6000MHZ possible?
I'm hoping that Zen 4 with 3D cache will, as the 5800X3D did, ameliorate the performance impact of slower memory, and thus allow for highly performant quad rank setups.
If AMD isn‘t releasing a 16-core 3D SKU this time around I‘ll be pretty pissed myself. Remember that 5900X3D sample Lisa Su was holding into the camera over a year ago? Let‘s hope Intel can put the competition pressure back to AMD so AMD stops acting all Intelly circa 2013. :(
Honestly I would get a 3D Vcache version if that means I can run slower ECC ram since you could get the best of both worlds: good stability and good performance.
3D Vcache would even help out a bit with power consumption since main system memory can be accessed less and clocked lower making the whole platform more attractive. Fuck the responsible product managers.
You don't need 7950x3d. It's a productivity chip. It already isn't that great for gaming so the cache wouldn't be that helpful. The only chip that makes sense for gaming in a practical sense is the 7800x3d. If you do work just get the 7950x as the 3d version isn't going to be any better. The productivity applications won't benefit from the cache. If AMD even makes one it won't be anytime soon.
It is not wise to project your own computing demands on other people. Not everything revolves around gaming and there is a reason AMD released a few Milan-X SKUs but only a Ryzen fig leaf. And that reason isn’t that AMD is looking out for its lower tier consumer platform wanting to help customers not accidentally buying a 3D CPU that’s a bit more expensive than the non-3D counterpart.
you just saved my sanity with this video... as it has been a few years since i last built a machine, i would never have expected the limitations we currently face with 4 DIMMs. 10minute Boot times? No freaking way... but yet, here we are.
Got my 128GB to run at 3800MHz, will have to see if its stable though.
Wonderful presentation. This is the first video of yours I've watched and it is a breath of fresh air. I've seen way too many channels where the speaker has no script, has not idea what they will say, and half of their presentation is them correcting themselves or not saying anything at all.
Thank you for this exact video.
I was just about to put together a 7950x ASUS Hero X670 and 128g of trident Z Neo just like this for a new workstation. I'm glad i'm holding off. My 5950x is running 128g nicely and i'll just wait a good while
Why would you need 128gb with a 16-core processor?
@@DerekDavis213 large RAM disk for converting movies without killing your ssd or waiting for spinning rust
@@DerekDavis213 AVID media Composer. it uses most of it. Use lots of single core application that preferer high clock speed instead of threadripper. My 4090 does more workhorse than the 5950x :)
@@nathanlowery1141 An recent nvme ssd can read and write at 7000 megabytes/sec.
An Intel Optane drive has very high performance, for smaller queue depths.
How much faster could a RAM disk be?
@@vortexsophia You are using AVID? And I thought that all serious editors use Mac and Final Cut?
Just kidding! Mac is overpriced garbage.
The content I have been waiting for. I always want to see how far can these platforms go with extreme memory size. Finger cross and see if Buildzoid will also test 128GB on AM5.
This is a great video! Thank you for talking about this, and for talking about the ddr5 inserting issues.
this video needs an update. AMD a couple months ago released a bios update that improved multiple ram related things (like allowing 7000s series to run 6400MTs ram at 1:1:1)
I'm currently running 128gb DDR5 at 4600mt/s with my 7950x. They are two 2x32gb kits of corsair CMK64GX5M2B5200Z40 (5200 mts c40). Those kits were pretty cheap compared to most lately and probably still are today.
That's the max I was able to run them on both an Asus proart creator wifi x670e board and an asus prime x670e pro wifi board. Both running at docp profile 1 and setting the target frequency to 4600 (no other tinkering, using the latest bios which you do need to update!). Above that it won't boot.
Not officially supported but I think its the most bang for the buck 128gb configuration I could find. Hopefully this info can help some people. Maybe I could manually OC to squeeze a bit more but I've read of instability issues so I don't bother with it.
I might upgrade in the future when true 4 stick kits become supported, available and affordable. Imo buying more expensive ram than my config is just not worth it as it's pretty clear something much better will come along eventually and you're gonna need to upgrade anyway, even if you splurge for the higher end ones now. I kinda also doubt the current kits will get that much better support through bios updates as many manual OCers have tried their best to push them to their limits in 128gb configurations with no success. I don't think a docp profile that actually can get them to their rated max speed is even possible.
Thanks for this great video. Wish this video was available when I made my build, it would've saved me a ton of digging in forum, trial and error buying the wrong things, and tinkering around in the settings. I'm sure it'll help out a lot of people.
Ps: my boot times are very fast now, once the first boot was completed. The memory training time on first boot is always very long, and annoying since you never know if it will eventually succeed or not. If you follow my config you should have no problem matching my results easily and get a very usable working 128gb setup at a somewhat decent speed. Cheers y'all!
Pps: heard the expo version of my kits currently have a bunch of issues, my local shop has stopped carrying them. I recommend you get the regular xmp version like me.
I had 32gb ram and I double to 4 sticks so 64gb pc was stable for days speed was 5200mhzt then got a blue screen heard if u reduce the speed should be fine, so I reduce by 200mhzt running at 5000mhzt gonna see if it works, but two sticks even at 6000mhzt is fine.
What voltage are you running the sticks at?
I was running 2x32 blades of Vengeance CL32 6400Gbz at 6000Ghz with no issues. Today added 2 extra blades and my hell started. Updated the Bios before installing them. Got them recognized at bios, boot, and no POST or windows Anymore. I was only able to see the bios again removing PHYSICALLY the 2 new blades. So i see the BIOS, was able to down the speed to 4000Mhz, put the blades again, and finally it boots. (But it took me some hours in the process of trial and error. And Having to remove the blades each time to see the bios is a nightmare. Now i am running 128Gb at 4000Ghz. Gonna re-read your post and try to squeeze more of it.
Wish I saw this video first before buying 2 pairs of Corsair Vengence 5200mhz kits for 128gb total. Luckily I didn't buy high end ones, which would have wasted the chip speeds. On my MSI PRO X670-P WIFI with 7950x I was able to get a stable 4600mhz - it passed two PassMark memory test runs. 4800mhz posts and boots, but fails memory test. 5000 and over does not post and need a CMOS reset (or take out two of the chips to boot and change bios settings)
AMD and Intel really don't want you to use consumer chips for workstation work any more.
Have they ever? The real issue is that HEDT are now utterly unaffordable. I remember when the i7 920 was common.
@@Bayonet1809 Having to shell out 2k+ $ just to get more PCIe lanes is moronic. We have multiple PCIe slots but can realistically only use 1 maybe 2 of them.
Worst thing is that it's kind of blatant what they are doing when only giving us 24-28 lanes.
@@Yock1980 I like how Asus does the PCIe setup on their WS X570 ACE board, it really helps out in terms of expanded PCIe capabilities (at the cost of some extra latency I'm sure)
I had similar issues getting just 64GB of DDR4 4000Mhz running even XMP on my x570-ryzen 9 5950x setup. I eventually got all 4x dimms running at 3733mhz with an fclk of 1866 but it was a pain in the ass with a lot of testing and restarts and instability.
This is information I wanted to know and couldn't find elsewhere. Great video.
The video is interesting, this “next room approach” is actually practical in most homes. I used to think that water cooling was a necessity for a Silent Gaming PC / Workstation until I tried positive air pressure (inside the case). With positive air pressure and enough high-quality fans in the proper orientation and a good enough case you can enjoy a silent PC with near water cooling temps (less than 60 Celsius under load). I use Arctic 120mm fans, they won’t go above 1000rpm often, and they are not expensive like Noctua fans. In my personal experience the Best orientation for air is top to bottom with PSU fan facing inside the case (as exhaust fan), and front to back with a WS case (with 3 front fans). Even blower style GPUs get cooled efficiently because of the fresh air being pushed / moved constantly inside the case. The key is to have more / faster intake fans, and less / slower exhaust fans, and not to have conflicting / opposing airflow; this way the air moves quickly and the fans don’t have to spin up to higher RPMs.
Recently I built a 7950 system (Asus x670e ROG Crosshair Extreme) for a deep pockets client. He ordered 128gb of Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 5200.
With all 4 sticks, it would never run more than 3600mt/s, and took 20+ minutes to train/post.
With just two sticks, it would hit 4800mt/s (still not the 5200 advertised), and enabling manual DOCP would refuse to post even after an hour of training.
We were both a bit confused and upset. He currently decided to stick to the 64gb.
"still not the 5200 advertised"
Cause NONE of the memory those brands sold is official DDR5 5200/6000/whatever. They are all overclocked, way different timings, way higher voltage/power.
Right now we are just seeing the first few JEDEC 5600 kits arriving, 5200 for a bit longer - but JEDEC 5200 means 38 CAS and 1.1V. But most memory that you can get is glorified overclocked DDR5 4000-4800.
@@ABaumstumpf I understand that JEDEC is all that's guaranteed. However, they advertise DOCP at 5200, and the set was on the QVL for the mainboard, so in theory it should work, and was advertised to do so.
I have the XMP version (F5-6000J3040G32GX2-TZ5RK) and 7950x. Was hoping to upgrade to 128GB down the road. Hopefully future AM5 CPUs will have a better IMC to support DDR5 6000 with 4 DIMMs.
64GB DIMMs would probably be easier
Aw awesome! I was just looking for advice about this topic yesterday. I can't believe with the newness and pricing of AM5 motherboards, the IMC is such a problem. For now I'm going to go with a B650 (why 670 with the same iffy IMC?) and only 64GB. Sadly, going to Intel for 128GB seems to not really bring much benefit. Ya, I'm poking at you Intel also.
I can't thank you enough for the heads up on the memory I would been waiting for that snap in sound.
Thanks, Wendell! Hopefully things will continue to to improve with the X3D chips and the eventual Zen 5 series.
I have to give you some praise on your camera quality and your lighting!! Watching on a QD-OLED is amazing! I wish more youtubers would step up the game! Great job!
Thank you so much for uploading this. This is exactly what I was concerned about for my new build.
Top shelf reporting 👍
Thank you Wendell
Any updates to this?
Thanks for addressing the 13900K since that would have been the next question. It can't remember a time when the memory technology was that far ahead of the memory-controller technology and this is Intel's 2nd round.
ikr 😢
2:20 oh god
so when i'm putting ddr4 modules and they fight me so much that i'm afraid that i'll snap the board in half with how much it's bending, with ddr5 i just won't be able to install any in the first place without breaking the board in half immediately?
Curious how this is aged after a year of BIOS updates
Is there any update on this? Has am5 memory support gotten any better with newer BIOSs?
They really should reinforce the RAM slots and make it so RAM sticks can properly insert themselves into the slot without having some janky thing where it doesn't fully click into place. When inserting RAM you're putting a lot of pressure on the slot and RAM sticks, which feels like it's gonna break.
Even on generations before, inserting RAM could be feeling pretty sketchy sometimes - so hearing this about DDR5 has me a little worried lol. But I'm sure manufacturers will figure it out sooner or later, just how they'll have to figure out more resilient PCIe slots.
Yeah - Probably not a good idea to reseat them when the motherboard is in the case on the standoffs ...
Boards are wildly more expensive and more cheaply made what a joke
For AM4 boards I only had troubles with ASRock, never issues with other brands. I had a b350 fatality with a 1700, and a b450 fatality with a 3600. Both motherboards wouldn't go over 2800mhz ram with 3600mhz sticks. Then I grabbed a b450 Asus board and put the Ryzen 5 3600 in it, and the ram will OC to 3800mhz with same timings as 3600mhz.
I also want to upgrade my AM4 3600 64GB (2dims) to 128GB 4dims. Are you saying I can expect problems with that ? 🤔
I bought used B350 motherboard with 1700x, that had pretty old bios and 2666mhz Adata 4x4gb kit. I could not make it run at 2666. 2400 had stability problems and only 2133 worked fine. After bios update it could easily run 2666 and then when I upgraded to 3200Mhz kit it also run fine at 3200Mhz without any issues, so a lot of memory problems on first ryzens was solved by bios updates. I also think that memory manufacturers had to learn "AMD" again after being abandoned for a while. It was a lesson for both - motherboard and ram manufacturers to get back into AMD and make some compatibility tuning. I don't know how it was before, but now I even do not have to tune the Infinity Fabric. It always automatically sets itself to 1:1 ratio with memory.
The bandwidth speeds you mention do sound so low. Are these single core bandwidth or is that the real limit of the full multi core bandwidth of the chips.
I am sitting here with an M1 Max MBP im thinking my single core bandwidth is 2x that let along the multi core bandwidth.
Thanks for the insight. Fresh build on an unfamiliar asrock board had me going crazy. All makes sense now. 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Finally. Thank you for all you work and such helpful explanation of the topic. I fought for a day trying to make memory run at least at 4000. But apparently i should not.
Ahh this sucks.
I was hoping to upgrade to a 7x00X3D system with AVX512 and 128GB 6000 ram. But that looks unlikely now.
What do we know about the ecc capabilities of ddr5? Is it any good?
My experience with modern DDR4 and DDR5 has been a pick one of two. 1). Lots of RAM at lower speed and higher latency. 2.) Some RAM at high speed and low latency.
Yep, unless if with DDR4 you want to spend a good amount more money then you can somewhat get both, but usually its not worth it
@@MrMaddog2004subscribe Spend money to get better what ? Memory ? Motherboard ? Isn't this mostly a memory controller limitation ?
@@Winnetou17 RAM binning is a thing, RAM that's running on the edge won't be stable even on the best matured CPU/Chipset
15:30 but is it good enough? how much loss in real use/world performance are we talking about?
I built my new rig in October with a 7950x and 4090, I have 4 x 16gb DDR5 6000mhz RAM, it's the Kingston Beast EXpo Ram.
I have been having very slow booting and occasionally (once a week or so) it won't boot at all and requires a CMOS clear to get into Windows.
The machine is an absolute beast when in Windows and running well and it holds 6000mhz without stability problems but these little annoyances with booting etc do get old very quickly, for example my old AM4 system booted into Windows in less than 5 seconds, I'm closer to 45 secs to 1 min with the new machine.
I wasn't aware that 4 DIMMS could cause an issue with X670, wish I'd gone with 2 x 32gb kit now.
I will try to remove a couple DIMMS and do some testing, see if the boot times and stability improves, thanks a lot for bringing this to light, not a lot of people are covering these topics
Can you please do memory intensive benchmarks for 128gb running at 3600mhz (AMD Recommend level) and compare with 5200/6000?
You are one of the first to address this important issue 👍
8:00 "It was clocking faster on Ryzen 1000 and 2000 series..."
Nope, you are mistaking on that. I owned a 1700x and never was able to clock my memory above 2900MHz on the first AGESA BIOS update. It was fixed after around a years. Same thing will happens as AGESA update are going to drop.
There’s a typo on your hoodie. It should say “…your computer, Linus.”
Thank you for this. I just did a rebuild with AM5 7950x on an ASUS Proart x670e board. I am doing a lot of heavy video file editing in Davinci and was clued into having more memory capacity is key to smooth experience when rendering frames during editing. Like 12bit raw 4-8k footage. Anyways I wanted to get 128gb running and ASUS kept telling me it’ll only be stable with 2 of the 4 slots filled or I have to go with a 4 stick kit they recommended Kingston fury so I’m running that kit now but it’s xmp ready for Intel. I’m getting speeds of 3600 instead of the 5600 it’s rated for. Any attempt to push that memory faster leads to instability and safe mode booting. I’m not sure if this will be fixed later with newer bios as we go along with the platform. Or. Do you think there will be 2x64gb kits out there I should look into in order to free up those two slots? As of right now I’ve never had video editing run this smooth it’s awesome but it kinda eats at me to be leaving some performance somewhere on the table … Appreciate your help your channel and your time 🙏
Some people have told me that they could get the 5600 Trident Z kits to run 128GB stable by first letting the board and CPU memory train with 64GB, and then later filling in the rest of the 128GB and manually setting the speed to 5600 with auto on voltage. This was apparently with a Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master board. The kits they were talking about were the ones without EXPO, but labeled as Hynix within the Aorus Master's own QVL list page.
I can't run 5200mhzt on 4 dims ddr5 on a x670e hero with a 7900x, 4800mhzt works fine on 4 dims
Could you please address the same issue with Intel? The situation doesn’t appear to be any better over there 😢
Gone through the same pain with 4x 2R DDR4 sticks on dual channel platforms. I think high end consumer is long overdue getting an upgrade to memory channel support and should go where low end HEDT platform was.
I'm not sure there is actually much that can be done unless you go to something like dual sockets...
@@rkan2 He means bringing back consumer Threadripper / X299 platforms. Quad channel memory.
I recently built a new computer with a Ryzen 7 5700X on an ASUS B450M motherboard with two identical G. Skill DDR4-3200 32GB kits and ran into the same thing. The spec says 2933MHz maximum for four sticks of DDR4. I was able to get the system stable at 3000MHz, but some of the memory timings had to be set very loose, and it took alot of tuning to even get the 3000MHz going stable. At 3200MHz the system would absolutely have tons of memory errors, regardless of timings, and sometimes would not even POST. I'm guessing DDR5 is even more finicky due to the significantly higher clock speeds.
Thanks for the video. You've confirmed what I though was the case here with my computer: The memory controller is simply not up to the task of being overclocked with four sticks of RAM, even single rank.
Pretty much all of the ASUS memory QVLs that I've looked at for both Intel & AMD DDR5 boards currently only have 2 DIMM configs listed.
I ran 4X16 GB of DDR5 at 6000 mts for 13 months, (7800X3D, X670E steel legend, automatic EXPO) no problem. Until suddenly, one day, I started getting random BSODs or a frozen, unresponsive system. I don't know what fucked it up. Maybe a windows update. I am currently running them at 5200 with good timings, and that seemed to stop the random crashes. I am getting a 2X48 DDR5 kit next. Four dimms in AM5 is a bad idea and I did not know it at the time.
Please tell me I'm not the only one chuckling at the irony of a board called the Steel Legend being made up of mainly plastic 😆
The all new ASPaper Plastic Legend :D
it's Asrock, they have decades of consistent mediocre-to-poor quality and reliability on their record
That MB that he mentioned was mostly plastic was the Aorus one, he just happen to put it on top of the Steel Legend Box.
thans for making this vid. very informative. When i decide to build my system I'll be stikking with 64gb as for me the 7900 only igpu is enough same motherboard
It should be able to address 1TB total. Expecting it to be any faster than junk in the first implementation when they should have been making some kind of high-speed HBM3 module and socket system is idiocy.
I was able to run my 6400 128Gb (4x32Gb) just reducing the speed down to 4000Ghz. :( Latest MSI Bios, Vengeance CL32 - 6400Ghz). What a Hell !
I'm using f5-6000j3040g32gx2-tz5nr(2x32g) on a MSI mag tomahawk x870+9800X3D, running at 6400MTs + EXPO timings and it's running great.
Has this improved? I want 128Gb on AM5 board. Is it still that I should not buy faster than 3600Mhz memory?
I'm running 128GB using Corsair 5600 modules, but only at DDR5-4400, otherwise it's not stable. This is on latest 2024 bios Asus X670-P, 7950X
@@jamescarter9147 Luckily I studied this bit more and went with 2x48GB, at the time I was also considering Intel CPU as there memory works better, but in the light of recent news, good that I did not ;)
I'm shocked its working, but I'm running a 2x16GB kit of G.Skill DDR5-6000 CL30 in the A channel and a 2x16GB kit of G.Skill DDR5-6000 CL32 in the B channel with a 7900x. With EXPO set its actually running all 4 DIMMS at 6000 CL30. Its passed the stress tests I've tried and I've been using it for almost a week now without any problems.
Check your actual bandwidth, though. I've got four sticks of 2x32GB-5800 running stable at 6000, but the actual bandwidth isn't much better than running them at 4000, which is probably because the fabric downclocks to relieve the memory controller. Worse, because of whatever is happening in the background, my cache performance also suffers. Depending on your workload you may not actually benefit from running the memory at those speeds.
4x16GB presents similar strain to the IMC as 2x32GB, so your achievement is no better than Wendel's here.
Running a 7700x on Aorus Elite AX w/ 64GB Corsair Vengeance RGB at 5600. Bios is latest (Dec '22) and haven't had any issues yet.
Be sure to reference the DDR5 spec when talking about this. Section 10 talks about the speed bins and what you should be seeing, all the way up to DDR5-8400.
Hello, I have a question that I hope you can give me a short answer to. have tried to find an answer without success.
I have always used the same 4 pcs. 4GB memory chips 16GB.
(CORSAIR VENGEANCE BLUE 1600MHz 4GB 9-9-9-24 1.50V)
With an Asus sabertooth 990fx and
AMD FX8350
It worked fine for many years until I installed win11.
Then I started getting a blue screen. It took approx. 1 week between when it happened. After a lot of troubleshooting and testing with other memory chips, I found that only the first 2 memory chip slots worked. I came to the conclusion that it was the memory controller in the processor CPU. which was destroyed.
Since this is not a new CPU, I managed to buy it used and cheap and had my theory confirmed.
In the meantime before I bought a new CPU. then I built another computer from parts I had. A computer that was not quite complete. same year and actually the same system AM3+ but a different motherboard from the same year
(Gigabyte GA-870A-UD3 v1.2) a typical gaming motherboard from that era. The strange thing was that the 4 of these memory chips I had did not work and my computer would not work.
Then I took out one memory stick and replaced it with another memory stick
(Corsair Dominator 1333MHz 4 GB 1.65V 9-9-9-24 XMP)
and set memory chips in bios to 1600MHz and timing manually
9-9-9-24. it has so far worked perfectly without any errors.
My question is as follows.
1. Why did I have to replace one memory stick with another to make my computer work? Do you have any theory on this? After testing, I know that all 4 pcs. stick works without problems.
2. I tried some Overclocking programs in win 11 which were unstable and destroyed another set of 4 pcs. memory stick, that's what I think was the cause. I hadn't even set anything in the programs since they crashed. Can such a program destroy a memory stick? Do you have experience or a theory?
Thank you for saving me cash as I was definitely going to buy 128gb. You got yourself a new sub.
what about 4x48GB ram DDR5 5600 ? ... i want to build a new machine based on 9950x and x870e or 670e for Houdini / C4D and i cant find a 4x64 GB=256 gb ram kit, but i find only 192GB kit.
This doesn't sound great compared to DDR4... I am currently on AM4 with 128GB of DDR4-3600 memory, and in AIDA64 I get a read bandwidth of 53000 MB/s and a Latency of 77 ns. It sounds like DDR5 wouldn't be any better at all?
@Dmitry Akimov But the "failure" might really be the IMC on current CPUs as opposed to a failure of DDR5.
Same here. 5950X with 128GB 3600 CL16 works absolutely fine. Wont boot at all with 3800 even with a single stick but that 3600 is rockstable. Seems like one has to wait for the 8xxx Series AM5 Chips for better Performance with 4 DIMMs.
hmm I hard disagree on testing with memtest86 - it's OKAY to spot complete faults but as for stability naah gotta stress in windows.
corrupting the install can happen though that's true.
And/or use one of AMD’s feature advantages of not disabling ECC by default and use a motherboard and memory with ECC support. Have many AM4 systems with 128 GB of ECC memory and no issues with DDR4-3200.
and never do either on an arc fault breaker (without a UPS)
I think this should be revisited soon with all the recent updates
I would LOVE to see this video for the Z690 or Z790 platform with the new 13th gen processors. I cannot, for the life of me, find a comprehensive overview of what one can expect on those platforms with 4DIMM configurations.
Thanks for this coverage. The main reason I haven't upgraded to a new platform is I want reasonable speeds at 128GB. Had been leaning towards Intel DDR4 since there are several motherboards that have QVL 128GB at 3600.
I really wish this situation was better for either platform. Rn “upgrading” from AM4 128GB to Z790 64GB :/
May I ask respectfully what it is you do that benefit from RAM more than 64GB? Out of curiosity.
@@penguinbelly For me at least it's a lot of software development work, which needs surprisingly quite a bit of RAM, incl all the browser tabs and microservices spread among multiple projects
@@penguinbelly workstations for rendering and power users with home/small businesses servers (video, XFS, etc). I can’t see why you’d need it for gaming or most other applications.
I think 128GB support needs time to mature. In the end we're talking about consumer boards and board manufacturers will test RAM and optimize UEFI settings for the memory configurations which are around the sweetspot for consumers, so 16GB or 32GB in total.
And Intel has the 2nd gen CPUs with DDR5, so it can be assumed that they have improved the IMC in Raptor Lake compared to Alder Lake. If I remember correctly, early adopters had also issues with DDR5 compatibility.
So let's wait and see what AGESA and UEFI updates bring in the future.
First build 13900K 128gb Corsair dominator platinum 520hz. Evangelion z690- no problems 4800hz out the box. Can’t get xmp to work. 🤷🏼♂️
Well it's not just 128GB, it's 64GB if you're using 16GB DIMMs
@@thepopeofkeke this cannot be true unfortunately, I suspect your settings are unstable. Even 13900K cannot run 128GB stable greater than 4200ish, all manufacturers tried and failed at it
Actually it's companies forcing us to upgrade to workstation systems so that they get more money. Absolutely awful that I can't use 128gb ram in am5 motherboard at desired RAM speed.
I have a Crosshair X670E and it's a heap of crap. Slow to get BIOS updates, and when they finally bother, they're unstable or cause more issues than they solve. My machine still tries to do memory training eithe every or every other boot leading to 40s - 2 minute POST times.
Tied different RAM at stock, DOCP, manual settings, the board just sucks
I bought the G.SKILL 64GB 2x32 6000 CL32-38-38-96 1.40v.
And have been wondering if i've made a mistake not getting the CL-30-40-40-96 one.
Or are they pretty much the same.
Can anyone tell me?
Just got 128GB in my home server based around a 7950x. Works great 👍
Is it still doing any good and stable sir?
Using more than 4 ranks was a problem in any RAM generation since SDR. That's why you should avoid dual rank RAM if you want to add more later.
Remembering first generation Threadripper, and it was almost a year before we had good bedded down memory. Starting from a better place this time, but still a long way to go.
Ill be trying the 64GB (2x32GB) of Trident Z5 6000mhz CL30 on a 7700 system shortly. Really happy they launched with non RGB variants.
oh they did? I couldn’t find a retail kit recently
@@ChatGTA345 yeah just got it during Black Friday for a build so glad I don't have to get RGB I can't turn off
@@profosist Haha nice! I'm building one now also, but wanted to get non-RGB perhaps cheaper because I'll put it under water
Wonderful video. The following are 2 - 4x 32gb ddr5 memory kits that are on Amazon :
SABRENT Rocket DDR5 128GB U-DIMM 4800MHz Memory Kit (4x32GB) for Desktops and PCs (SB-DR5U-32GX4) this kit is $799.96 and A-Tech 128GB (4x32GB) DDR5 4800 MHz UDIMM PC5-38400 CL40 DIMM 288-Pin 2Rx8 1.1V Desktop RAM Memory Modules - this kit is $679.99. Maybe having 4 matched dimms might do a little better. I have 128gb on my current system ( AM4 ) build. At the time I put this together all of the parts were the best for there respective class - since then newer updated parts have replaced my parts as the best. The RX 6900xt was the best gpu class for gpu's from AMD now there is the RX XX50 replacements. Maybe the lack of a central memory controller might be a part of the issues at the moment.
thanks for this I want only 64GB but fining it hard to get 2x 32GB so was thinking of getting 4x16GB but after this Ill stick it out till a 64gb set is in stock thank you
Not sure If this relates: I have a lenovo legion 5, 4800h laptop with 64gb of ram (i know not the same as am5 at all but stick with me). For the longest time I thought my sticks were bad because I would get memory corruption. It was actually something to do with the IGPU and switching between Linux and windows. Something was not getting reset! If I went from Linux to windows I would get BSoD.....then memtest would show issues too. My theory is that between boots the igpu was still holding onto some of the system memory....it wasn't being properly released. Enabling/disabling the igpu....different Linux distros....different ways of rebooting (doing an actual power off vs rebooting) all yielded different results in memory stability.
And before you ask.....this memory could go through an entire 24hrs of memtest and not have problems. It was 100% not the sticks themselves.
I’d hate to see how tedious higher capacities would be since 256GB is technically possible with DDR5. Haven’t even seen any 64GB DDR5 UDIMMs outside of the server space yet…
For reference I just used this to get 2 Corsair 64Gb ( 2 x 32 ) up and running at 6000-30-36-36-76, I am yet to stability test and I was booting into linux.
I am running 7950X3D over Rog Crosshair Hero X670E Motherboard with 32GB * 4 (128 GB) of memory from GSkill (Neo Z5 ARGB 6000 MHz). Highest memory clock i am able to run stable is 4000 MHz. Anything beyond is guaranteed to cause C5 error
I have 4x16GB running at 6000 MT/s CL36 on my 7950X. it's actually 6200 MT/s ram, but i downclocked using Memory Try It for better overall timings, and auto:1:1. I did have to lock uclk:memclock to 1:1 in the bios manually.
I did use memory that MSI listed as QVL'ed for four sticks. (MSI x670-P Pro Wifi)
Yeah, it seems like 4 stick combinations are much easier with 16gb rather than 32. Glad its working out for you! Not sure how 2x32 compares to 4x16 tho
I dunno man, it took 5 minutes to say "make sure the DIMMS are inserted all the way". Video actually starts at 8:30.
Thank you for this testing! This is a lot of work
The IMC is underbuilt for that much work, the good thing is it is in the IO die,so a simple revision of that would suffice to improve things, no need to fiddle with the core chiplet whatsoever. Remember, zen was and pretty much still is a server design adapted for other use.
My two configurations are 2x2x16GB Kingston FURY 6000MT/s CL 36 with EXPO, so total 64GB, they run without any problem with the EXPO setting at 6000MHz on a Asus x670e Hero mainboard. Then my 128 GB configuration is 2x2x32GB G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo. They run when I set EXPO II at DDR5-6000 30-40... but then I have to set the Memory Frequency to DDR-4800, EXPO I is not stable but EXPO II is running my applications mostly without problems. With 4x 32GB I get Memory Read=62007MB/s Write 70202 MB/s Copy 61156 MB/s latency 96.8. I'll have to check that also with the 4x16GB what should be much faster.
i like the tips about putting ram. it's really very helpful 💜
im still on launch day 1800x and i remember the day going to get it, and the next few weeks on forums lol.
im still rocking the 1800x, 1080ti STRIX,
TridentZ 2 x 16GB 3200 16-16-16-36 had the ram timings tighter for a few years, now back to stock,
C6H.
it running games fine/ok lol always want more right?! back then and to date iv said im gonna upgrade this system around about 2025 now to wait. i also have custom water setup so not wanting to upgrade every 2-3 years. im ok with the long haul i just try to build with the best parts out at the time and run the system for many years or until its not doing what i want it to.
at the time of writing the non RGB version that has a 10,67ns true latency instead of the 10,00 is arround 74 euro cheaper. that's almost 80 usd price diff.
G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB F5-6000J3040G32GX2-TZ5NR vs G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo F5-6000J3238G32GX2-TZ5N
when buying 2 kits that's a lot of money .. i don't know if i need that much mem right away.. perhaps in a few years when prices drop.. never plugged in more mem later on in a build.. am i correct in assuming i need to get at least the same latency and speed and be ok ??????
Where are the problems with 4 DDR5 coming from?
Is it something which can be fixed in future by a BIOS update by AMD and/or by motherboard manufacturers?
When the motherboard manufacturer offers 4 DIMM slots for DDR5, and it is not really possible (at least not now?), is it not a reason to give the motherboard back or get a price reduction, when I already bought it, but want to keep it?
Is there a size limitation per DIMM? So could a DIMM bigger than 32 GB be a solution? So 2x64GB could be possible and a solution for the future? What is the maximum DIMM DDR5 size, which current system support?
Same problems on "the other side"? How is it going on Intel side with 4x DDR5?
th-cam.com/video/pmCRg3jvfIk/w-d-xo.html
I guess I got _really_ lucky, then. I'm running two 2x32GB-5800 kits on my 7950X and they'll even overclock to 6200 (well, momentarily, I invariably crash before my overclocking live USB gets to KDE). I have been running it at 6000 with conservative timings since I put the system together, though, and it's been remarkably stable (no errors in over 24 hours of memtest86). iGPU also works fine (though I still haven't been able to pass it through to a VM...)
Booting is ridiculously slow of course (about fifteen minutes, thankfully I hardly ever turn my computers off), which is why I've been restraining myself from trying to improve the settings. Measured bandwidth varies wildly from boot to boot, mostly some flavour of poor, but I do sometimes get good performance. If I wanted speed more than capacity I'd be better off running a single kit, having both kits in at once definitely kicks the memory controller into some fallback mode where performance plummets so in terms of actual bandwidth I rarely get over 90GB/s, and worse, it actually does hurt my L3 performance quite severely (I've seen it go as low as 800GB/s, but mostly it hovers around 1500-1700), but it is still technically four sticks running at 6000, and going down to 3600 or so to not hurt the L3 will benchmark worse. This isn't EXPO RAM, though, and I am running it at a very high voltage. Running a single kit at a time lets me push much higher clocks and bandwidths, so it may simply be a matter of winning the silicon lottery five times in a row (memory controller and all four memory modules). I'm eagerly awaiting new BIOSes that may reduce boot times a bit, I suspect that running all four DIMMs does bad things to the infinity fabric, which decoupling fabric base clock from CPU base clock may help resolve, but when it takes twenty minutes to check each change I make I simply don't have the time. Even if all this capacity does hurt cache and processor performance (and it certainly does, I just cba to find out how badly yet), it's still less bad than swapping to disk would be.
I've been pleasantly surprised with AMD this generation, and my expectations were already pretty high. On my 12900K these same memory kits, even alone, couldn't boot on XMP. The best I could get out of them was 5600. At least the timings were good. Normally I'd expect Intel to overclock memory better even though AMD is more dependent on high memory clocks, but here my experience has been that Intel can't overclock at all while AMD performs miracles.
That said, 90GB/s on DDR5 is pretty unimpressive when I was hitting 100+GB/s on DDR4 several years ago. A last generation Threadripper would get me much more capacity at comparable bandwidth, and it could even be ECC without an awful lot of bother. The extra cores mostly compensate for the loss of per core performance.
I really think two DIMMs per channel ought to die. Either give us four channels outright, or make motherboards with only two slots. As it is those few of us who do benefit from running four DIMMs in a computer should just pay the EPYC tax and get a proper workstation instead. Much higher capacity. ECC. IPMI. A sensible amount of PCIe lanes instead of the utterly inadequate pittance they deign to throw us filthy plebeians.
No, you did not get lucky. Wendel is talking about 4x32GB. 2x32GB was more than capable of running at 6000MHz.
@@Bayonet1809 I wrote that unclearly, I'm doing the same thing Wendell is. Two kits of 2x32GB = 4x32GB.
@@СузаннаСергеевна Wait, so you are running 4x32B DIMMs at 6000MHz, fully stable?
Could you please say what exact RAM kit part number you used and on what motherboard?
Can you post details about this on the level1 forum there are several people who are stuck at 4600 and if you have 6000 stable then that's amazing
Seconding this, if you could post on the level1 forum thread in the video description, that would be really helpful. Thanks so much!
im on an asrock pg riptide m-atx with a ryzen 7950x and it cant handle 2x 16gb ddr5 corsair 5600. Always errors, bsod. I take out one stick, so its only running one stick of 16bg and its fine. I swap sticks, fine. I try the single stick in any slot, fine. put two sticks back in, problems. I know this isnt a help forum but if anyone reads this would be great to know a fix
Thank God for corsair they're dropping 4 dimm kits just got a 4 dimm kit of 6600mhz at 32-34-34 76 also only 91gb/s? My intel platform is pushing over 100gb/s currently with the previously mentioned 4 dimm set closer to 107 with an overclock but I'm uncomfortable with how high I have to have the voltages to maintain stability... also having the igpu enabled causes stability issues with my Intel platform
My asus x670e gene has been a champ. Boot times are slow but i honestly dont mind. I turned on the auto memory thing that checks timings every boot on purpose. Which is weird because "disabled" means enabled and "enabled" means its disabled. Out of the box it was on enabled meaning auto memory was off. Thus first time I booted it was just like am4, instant on.... But i like the feature to check timings and make sure its running right, so I "disabled" the thing in the bios which enabled the longer boot time.
Has the four stick AM5 thingy been resolved at all?
How the hell does the latency drop below the specification of +/- 90 nanoseconds ?