Callers Logic: If we hire 7 white guys who passed the bar and are qualified for the job, its not DEI. If we hire lets say, 7 black women who also passed the bar and are qualified for the job, its considered DEI. moment Destiny was pointing that out "We can agree to disagree" Lmao
Or just racism, it’s literary oh this judge is ruling against what I want and is black, has to be dei, conservative really haven’t changed culture wise since the 1920s
Conservative values appeal to racists much more than progressive values, leading to this type of unwavering defense in spite of every conceivable contradiction and misdeed. When you find someone that's unable to accept reality to this degree, just know there are some much deeper convictions that keep them from looking at anything you can present rationally; it's superficial to them at that point.
"Conservative values appeal to racists much more than progressive values" Say that to "cis white males" and everyone getting a free pass at being racist and sexist against them..
It was literally insane listening to them talk. they’re mad that there’s black successful people so they Make delusions up saying DEI yet can’t name anyone who wasn’t deserving of the role
No one is mad that there are black succesfull people, what are you talking about. They're mad that merit is being put in the backseat in the face of skin pigmentation.
Race and gender based quotas are a societal cancer, and the fact that american liberals sniffed their farts so much to the point where they have convinced themselves they are fighting the good fight by promoting this shite is beyond pathetic to anyone not high on the same supply.
I like how yt people think all yt people in their jobs deserve them and aren’t dumb. There’s not ONE dumb yt person that got a job from nepotism, quid pro quo, someone they knew, didn’t even put in an application. All yt people are qualified geniuses…then he goes on to say there were “knuckle draggers” at Jan 6. So there are dumb yt people
I wish conservatives would just own who they are... They are already saying many things out loud that they wouldn't 10 years ago, just go all the way already!
DEI is part of the reason people question any potential DEI as not being qualified. Doesn’t matter if they were hired for that reason when people think they may have. The same issue happened with collage. A black student who earned their spot would never know if they actually earned it. (I’m not sure if affirmative action was outlawed.) I’ll look later
I feel like I’m having a similar argument with an idiot on Facebook about the Iraq pull out plan being Trumps plan. He’s like “Biden was president it was his fault, he could have renegotiated and done it better.” It’s like he doesn’t know how politics and foreign affairs works
Gotta love how cowardly guys like this one is that throws out vague claims and insinuations because they are too craven to say exactly what it is and will run away as soon as they are pinned down.
I feel like there are two different possible arguments being mashed together here: that affirmative action leads to worse candidates winning, and that it's unfair for all the people who were excluded a priori. The right seems to mainly argue in terms of the former (at least these days), but I think the latter is often what really makes them care.
How do you determine who's the worst candidate though? If you go by the judgement of their peers, then Trump has put the most unqualified judges on the bench.
@@notyourtypicalfarah7194 Not "just because", because if they do they can parade how morally virtuous they are. There's a big "because", but it's not one that's gonna produce good results in the long run.
Ye guy clearly has a point and you're setting him up in this weird trap, where he's claiming that DEI practice lowers the bar to qualify, and Destiny asks him "what's an example of someone who doesn't qualify because DEI standards were lower than the norm". Yes, he would indeed have to look at every case because the standards are subjective to some degree and this is a really nuanced question, and again clearly his argument is that this allows people to be LESS QUALIFIED. You're asking him for an example of someone who doesn't qualify as if he was spewing the maga talking points, so how does he justify that someone who meets a lower qualification bar than the norm "actually doesn't qualify"?
Destiny dodged the question of whether he thought 30 percent of judgeships being given to blacks suggested DEI. There is a reason he didn't respond yes or no to that.
He was trying to make the case that being DEI equals not qualified, and they wanted an example of someone who he believed was DEI and not qualified for the position they hold. He couldn't because he was so focused on their race and not their qualifications. It's a racist attitude.
@@Brightside34How do you determine who's most qualified other than the subjective opinion of the person who's picking? Those picks were the people he determined were most qualified.
Look, I do have an issue with dei. However, it's not a qualification thing. It's the prioritization on backgrounds like race, gender, sexual orientation that don't mean shit. It's why when these people talk about justice Jackson, they sound so stupid. She absolutely is qualified, it's just the assumed process (if race and gender were actually taken into account and it's not lip service) is less than ideal for elevating a federal judge to the supreme Court
its really a problem with the structure of liberal activism and the democratic party. the right of the party sonewalls anything that could be percieved as "radical redistribution" so in the abscence of universal welfare expansions or really scary shit like reparations, minority activist groups in the party can only endlessly push for more "representation"
The fact is that there's no need to argue with this on both sides and just show what will be the consequences of putting in women in power will do to this country... if you look in history, it's usually quite bloody.
As opposed to men in power? LMFAOOO I'm not trying to push a feminist agenda, but brother, the answer is right in front of you. Whether it's a woman or man, something between or beyond, power is the same. I don't know what kind of history you've been reading to not pick up on that, honestly.
It is insane how strong the convictions of some of these people can be as long it is to benefit trump. What a massive regard
90% of people rationalize things in their party's favour . It's a small percentage of people who actually think out their ideas
@@thehighone3175Rationalizing in your party's favor is entirely different from outright contradicting your own statements and denying reality.
Proper regarded
@@thehighone3175oh look! A both sides JAQ off. Any examples?
@@thehighone3175True and the other 9% just scream I'll lie so maybe 1% will change course.
Callers Logic: If we hire 7 white guys who passed the bar and are qualified for the job, its not DEI.
If we hire lets say, 7 black women who also passed the bar and are qualified for the job, its considered DEI.
moment Destiny was pointing that out "We can agree to disagree"
Lmao
I love that he keeps making him talk about futa and trans porn just to prove he is capable of giving actual answers.
Like right. I mean, how can you bring up trans porn in such a way that is actually productive for a political conversation. Steven found a way 🤣
Caller had many strong beliefs but could not point to any concrete examples of the beliefs.
absolute conviction built on a foundation of brainfarts
Or just racism, it’s literary oh this judge is ruling against what I want and is black, has to be dei, conservative really haven’t changed culture wise since the 1920s
WHATEVER LET'S JUST MOVE ON 😤
I mean, DEI puts the content of character in the backseat to advantage the color of skin, so.... yeah.
@@Mant111 So why back trump in the first place? He had no background in politics and or law. Sounds like he was a DEI pick. DEI is a red herring.
@@Mant111did you hallucinate this or is that actually written in any DEI hiring or training manuals?
Caller will vote “for the guy that acted stupidly.”
In those tiktok edits
"He only broke the law because Russia a-and the media"
Surely, now that Russia and the media are in hibernation he won't break the law anymore.
"He only broke the law because Russia a-and the media"
Surely, now that Russia and the media are in hibernation he won't break the law anymore.
Yesterday's stream was amazing.
Some parts of the stream maybe, but there were so many yapers I had to leave the stream because I do not give fuck about yaping.
Bring up a topic
*Get pushed on super hard*
Let's move to another topic guys
Conservative values appeal to racists much more than progressive values, leading to this type of unwavering defense in spite of every conceivable contradiction and misdeed.
When you find someone that's unable to accept reality to this degree, just know there are some much deeper convictions that keep them from looking at anything you can present rationally; it's superficial to them at that point.
Well said
"Conservative values appeal to racists much more than progressive values"
Say that to "cis white males" and everyone getting a free pass at being racist and sexist against them..
“It’s a cultural shift” yet has no specific examples.
It was literally insane listening to them talk. they’re mad that there’s black successful people so they
Make delusions up saying DEI yet can’t name anyone who wasn’t deserving of the role
No one is mad that there are black succesfull people, what are you talking about. They're mad that merit is being put in the backseat in the face of skin pigmentation.
Race and gender based quotas are a societal cancer, and the fact that american liberals sniffed their farts so much to the point where they have convinced themselves they are fighting the good fight by promoting this shite is beyond pathetic to anyone not high on the same supply.
Trump has no competence to being charge of a ice cream kiosk let alone being president of the USA.
Tbh ice cream 🍨 is very important 😂
Best arguments for any debate/discussion: It's so obvious. You just don't get it.
Sounds like a media bubble self-report
This was a really solid smackdown damn. Destiny is really sharp with the counterpoints.
Amy Coney Barrett is less qualified than any "DEI" judge. Eileen Cannon too. Does this guy have this POV for them too?
Fuentes is a Fed???!
Always has been
i mean didnt he hang out with trump? trump is the definition of a fed
Duh! he makes conservatives look bad.
Guy really just wants to move on
I like how yt people think all yt people in their jobs deserve them and aren’t dumb. There’s not ONE dumb yt person that got a job from nepotism, quid pro quo, someone they knew, didn’t even put in an application. All yt people are qualified geniuses…then he goes on to say there were “knuckle draggers” at Jan 6. So there are dumb yt people
TALK TO EM!!
"I'm driving so I can't look up specific examples" 😂😂😂 I loled so hard.
I wish conservatives would just own who they are... They are already saying many things out loud that they wouldn't 10 years ago, just go all the way already!
The Intention Knower has logged on...
Personally I'd leave society for a month if i was humiliated so bad for being dumb
this logic was fantastic to listen to.
All I know is that we need Destiny's energy right now. He is the frustration we all feel towards these bigots and ignoramuses.
“ITS NOT SEMANTICS, ITS SUBSTANCE!” 🗣🗣🗣🗣
Every time he loses an argument: “Let’s move on…”
DEI is part of the reason people question any potential DEI as not being qualified. Doesn’t matter if they were hired for that reason when people think they may have.
The same issue happened with collage. A black student who earned their spot would never know if they actually earned it. (I’m not sure if affirmative action was outlawed.) I’ll look later
Aileen Cannon isn’t qualified for her current position
I feel like I’m having a similar argument with an idiot on Facebook about the Iraq pull out plan being Trumps plan. He’s like “Biden was president it was his fault, he could have renegotiated and done it better.” It’s like he doesn’t know how politics and foreign affairs works
_Trumper: “Let’s just move on” aka I can’t back up my nonsensical bullshit ass claims beyond “it feels like”.._
Damn I was expecting him to bring up Ray Epps.
7:00 i believe in institutions brother is actually disabled.
Gotta love how cowardly guys like this one is that throws out vague claims and insinuations because they are too craven to say exactly what it is and will run away as soon as they are pinned down.
11:00 sums all this beautifully
THERE WAS A FIREFIGHTTTT (and one side came with water pistols)
I feel like there are two different possible arguments being mashed together here: that affirmative action leads to worse candidates winning, and that it's unfair for all the people who were excluded a priori. The right seems to mainly argue in terms of the former (at least these days), but I think the latter is often what really makes them care.
I'd say both are true. which is why DEI is crap.
It’s not real it never happens
No one is hiring unqualified people just because. Companies are not going to lose money. It's cope for losers
How do you determine who's the worst candidate though? If you go by the judgement of their peers, then Trump has put the most unqualified judges on the bench.
@@notyourtypicalfarah7194 Not "just because", because if they do they can parade how morally virtuous they are. There's a big "because", but it's not one that's gonna produce good results in the long run.
Owned
Ray Epps Ray Epps. 😂
He’s looking in my eyes wtf. This is not normal or okay.
Idk how he does it dude
Yt vs yt so entertaining 😂
Whatever income you are earning Destiny, its clearly not enough.
My brain hurts. 😂
Ye guy clearly has a point and you're setting him up in this weird trap, where he's claiming that DEI practice lowers the bar to qualify, and Destiny asks him "what's an example of someone who doesn't qualify because DEI standards were lower than the norm". Yes, he would indeed have to look at every case because the standards are subjective to some degree and this is a really nuanced question, and again clearly his argument is that this allows people to be LESS QUALIFIED. You're asking him for an example of someone who doesn't qualify as if he was spewing the maga talking points, so how does he justify that someone who meets a lower qualification bar than the norm "actually doesn't qualify"?
But Trump is not embarrassing 😂😂😂
Bro bodied him. Thanks Destiny. Dude is representative of a Trump cultists.
Now destiny is wrong remember he did give a specific example. He said that guy you know that guy that trans guy. Lol
He didn't the example given was someone who was voted in nice try though
Destiny dodged the question of whether he thought 30 percent of judgeships being given to blacks suggested DEI. There is a reason he didn't respond yes or no to that.
How is that an example of DEI, and even if it was, if their qualified, what's the problem?
@@kap1618 The goal should be to hire the person "best qualified", not simply "qualified".
He was trying to make the case that being DEI equals not qualified, and they wanted an example of someone who he believed was DEI and not qualified for the position they hold. He couldn't because he was so focused on their race and not their qualifications. It's a racist attitude.
@@Brightside34How do you determine who's most qualified other than the subjective opinion of the person who's picking? Those picks were the people he determined were most qualified.
@@exiledfrommyselfthey're black that's his actual argument and dei is just the n word.
lol
Haha this guy is a joke, he doesn't have a clue what he's talking about.
👏
Come on now, people really break the law, they just do certain... shady things sometimes. Because of you know, difficult situations. Lmao amazing cope
Look, I do have an issue with dei. However, it's not a qualification thing. It's the prioritization on backgrounds like race, gender, sexual orientation that don't mean shit.
It's why when these people talk about justice Jackson, they sound so stupid. She absolutely is qualified, it's just the assumed process (if race and gender were actually taken into account and it's not lip service) is less than ideal for elevating a federal judge to the supreme Court
its really a problem with the structure of liberal activism and the democratic party. the right of the party sonewalls anything that could be percieved as "radical redistribution" so in the abscence of universal welfare expansions or really scary shit like reparations, minority activist groups in the party can only endlessly push for more "representation"
The fact is that there's no need to argue with this on both sides and just show what will be the consequences of putting in women in power will do to this country... if you look in history, it's usually quite bloody.
What?
Cleopatra killed less people than King Leopold.
Yeah, a good example were all the female leaders of both ww1 and ww2. Especially adolphette, Josephina and the kaiserin Wilhelmina
As opposed to men in power? LMFAOOO
I'm not trying to push a feminist agenda, but brother, the answer is right in front of you. Whether it's a woman or man, something between or beyond, power is the same. I don't know what kind of history you've been reading to not pick up on that, honestly.
As opposed to men in power? LMFAOOO
I'm not trying to push an agenda, but brother, you've missed the forest for the trees.