I was so disappointed in Weghorst because he seemed like a great guy and teammate, played hard and did exactly what was asked of him...except score goals. He is exactly the type of veteran player you want helping to lead your club but he just wasn't up to standard. I wish him the best with the rest of his career.
Me too. I thought he would score more goals because he looked like a real goalscorer at wolfsburg. Somehow he was too clumsy at man utd. Can’t hate the guy though, he played his heart out.
I think Hojlund will surprise alot of people. He's got all the attributes to become one of the best strikers in the world & under the guidance of Ten Hag who will develop him we'll no doubt have one hell of a talent on our hands. Yes he's still raw but I am glad we're signing him as he's too good a talent to miss out on.
He needs a couple of years tbh but at 20 to have the confidence to come into one of the biggest clubs in the world and be the main man says everything you need to know about him It was like when we signed Rooney at 18 he wasn’t phased as he knew he would be one of the best players of his generation
@@pabloes588 Exactly that he's only 20 yet his all round game is already very impressive. His goals to minutes ratio is pretty decent aswell considering he's only played 20 full games for Atalanta. If u analyse Hojlund his movement is incredible has alot of pace for a big man holds the ball up well links the play works hard presses well everything Ten Hag wants in his striker Hojlund has got
@@chrissilvester5663 well we’ll give him time to develop but I feel the uk press won’t He’ll get the old Poundland haaland tag by jurnos who don’t actually know anything
@@pabloes588 Stuff the press man they don't matter. They're always out to criticise us at every oppertunity they get anyway. We've become accustomed to that. What matters is that our own fan base give the lad time & have patience which unfortunately they won't cos they're more obsessed with how much he cost then what he'll bring to the squad
Tbh, I wanted Osimhen at first but I guess he's too expensive for us since there's still uncertainty over United's takeover.. Højlund is the best cheaper option we can go for in the entire market, and I'd be glad to have him in the squad.
The age of Kane is a fair point, but a lot of the older players listed in the video have gone or will be gone before the start of the season. De Gea, Maguire, Weghorst, Fred. And Eriksen has been replaced in the starting 11 by 24 year old mount. Love your work 👍
Kane is way better than Rasmus. Kane brings in EXPERIENCE, QUALITY and LEADERSHIP! Rasmus will bring in chaos in the dressing room (selfishness, unhealthy competition btw specially btw him and Rashford (Antony)
@@starblacks6329Kane will bring chaos to the dressing room. He will be selfish and reported he would want the same wages as Ronaldo got, and Tottenham wont sell to a pl club. So there
@starblacks6329 Of course Kane is better, nobody would disagree but Levy refuses to sell to a direct rival so what is your point? Also how have you just decided that Hojland will bring chaos, selfishness and competition? That's just bullshit you made up in your own head because it soothed your need to agree with the nonsense in your brain.
I got a very good feeling about Hojlund. Ten Hag is going to turn him into a beast. In 2-3 years, everyone will be singing his name. Bruno's holywood passes and Eriksen's precision will give him all the chances that he needs to do what he does best, which is score. Imagine if Weghorst score half of the chances he squandered. He would leave united with at least 7 PL goals. Now imagine having an instinctive goal scorer at the end of such chances for over 30 PL games. This is gonna be an exciting one.
@@Thatdoginme_m3Hojlund is cheaper because he has done nothing. He has not been a prolific scorer anywhere. Couldn't even score in the Danish pub league. Julian Avalrez cost City £14m and he is more accomplished. I don't understand how Hojlund is worth the asking price when he simply hasn't done anything. If he has scored 20 goals I would think he is a little overpriced but I would think he is a top prospect but 9 goals is frankly a joke.
@@almac9203 Alvarez is 24 years old, Hojlund was just 19 last season, most of strikers are still develop under the youth team at that age, only few like Haaland or even Hojlund started to took the light of Europe football at under 19
@@tynn443 utter nonsense argument. Firstly Julian Avalrez is 23 not 24 and secondly he was signed last year at age 22. Haaland was signed at age 21. Secondly I have no problem with Hojlund being a raw prospect however he isn't priced like a raw prospect but is priced like a quality goal scorer which he isn't. Julian Avalrez cost £14m whereas they want £65m for Hojlund who has achieved nothing! I think it is laughable that you inflated the age of Alvarez then pretended Hojlund is younger than he is to exaggerate the age difference. Seriously what has Hojlund done to justify the price Atalanta is asking for? I would say Evan Ferguson is more impressive than Hojlund having performed at least as good if not better than Hojlund and doing it at age 18.
You can convince yourself on any signing by looking for positives. Doesn't mean he is actually good. Dude scored 9 goals last season. He has never been a prolific goal scorer. Couldn't even score in the Danish pub league. Would be a good prospect at £30m but £65m is a joke
@@jigmeedadul4174 I make no claims about what a player will be in 5 or 10 years time but right now the signing is a joke. He cost a few million more than Goncalo Ramos and Ramos is a way better player. I would wager that Nicholas Jackson will score more goals this season than Hojlund and Jackson cost less than half the money. My previous prediction about Mason Mount is already looking correct so let's see if I am 2 of 2.
The inflated prices quoted for him are all coming from British journalists. Alot of the Italian journalists are quoting lower. Can see it being done for around €60mil which I think is reasonable and he should only improve under ETH.
I love the video very creative and good analysis, concerning Hojlund it is just the asking price from Atalanta they value his over 70 million euros + 10 million euros as add-ons. United as of today 26/07 just presented a verbal bid of 50 million euros and 10 million add-ons which is fair evaluation for a player that hasn't achieved in his career yet. My concern is that if the deal will be too much United can look up another striker like Goncalo Ramos and Kolo Muani. I would prefer Kane and Hojlund this summer but not sure that deal can be made
Unlike Martial these past few years, the club has stabilized enough on the football side that I think Hojlund could be molded into a striker that will serve us well
Wonder if ten Hag is still interested in getting that Tadic esque false 9 to offer something different from a more traditional 9. He was interested in Gakpo back in January but didn't have the funds and he has been playing Sancho in that role this preseason
Vlahovic : *exists* In all seriousness though, super hyped for Hojlund, i firmly believe that he's going to looked back on be a key signing of the Ten Hag era
Vlahovic is a fine player when working within the penalty box. He does make good use of his strong frame and good finishing to put chances away. However, Vlahovic tends to take a lot of low-quality shots and is not the most comfortable when asked to drop deep and link play in the way Ten Hag often looks for in a striker.
He was doing well as a false 9 replacement during the Arsenal friendly. Was dropping down all the way to the halfway line and combining well with Mount.
Ferguson would be cheaper ??? It’s Brighton, and he’s just signed a new deal . They’d asked for 200 mil and wouldn’t even start negotiations for less than 100. They’ve just turned down 80 million for Caicedo, a player with the same length deal and a much more common profile on the market
He seems a great signing, also if we get a new owner at some stage probably not this window but the next, what is to stop us then buying oshimen to go along side hojlund
Probably the fact that two out and out strikers have not been used in a winning side since about 2000 mate. You will be calling for a Vinny Jones style hatchet man in midfield next😂😂😂
He is coming to MUFC... If ETH and his team manages to get best out of incredible potential then the glory days will surely return to theatre of dreams.
Only reason I would say the glory days won’t return for you is because there is so much competition with teams capable of winning now. City, Liverpool, Chelsea, Newcastle, Arsenal…
I really don't think Ferguson would even be cheaper as he just signed a new deal and has prem experience which immediately increases the price, not to mention Brighton's not looking to sell and are pretty flush (relatively speaking) after some recent deals. And lastly they are still being approached for caicedo so probably don't want the added hassle of looking for a Ferguson replacement as well, especially now undav has gone on loan
Ideally we need Kane houjland and a CDm/cm back up like amrabat along with a CB too tbh and next season I suspect we'll be in need of a new lb and RB too
If we can sign Kane on a loan from Spurs, he can be out 30+ goals man this season. He can even help Hojlund understand the PL better and could be vital in adapting to the PL and it's standards. (learning from the best) Besides that, we need a new CB and probably move in for Amrabat.
Had our 'wonderful' current 'owners' been able to sell the club in a reasonable timeframe (it's all about the money, let's face it), then perhaps one of the other two established players you mentioned would have been chased more seriously, and possibly Hojlund/Ferguson targeted too. But we don't have owners who can do anything in any reasonable timeframe and certainly not in the interests of the football club, so here we are. I hope if Hojlund comes in, he isn't a Forlan signing.
Jesus, again? Romano said 70M euros, that's 60M quid, Osimhen is double that, Kane is 100M, plus we can probably get him for 50 plus 10 on add ons, plus Hojlund just turned 20.
@@darthplagueis8886 Over £60m for an unproven prospect. Antony another guy that did nothing to justify €100m. Ask yourself why! The only kindergarten kids are the guys running United
Of course having Kane or Osimhen would be great. But ETH couldn't care less. Get kids, make them good/great and follow a long term plan. Man Utd couldn't compete for the title next season with Osimhen or Kane. ETH wants to build a team for his 3rd season at the club.
Literally any decent/semi decent striker would suffice. Taremi, Iheanacho, Scamaca, Milik.. Literally anyone would be an upgrade over the sum 0 strikers united have.
Not sure who I prefer hojlund or ferguson they both have hugh potential but kane is needed ans the most logic option but we dont wanna deal with levy and for some reason spend 60 mil on mount but not an extra few million for kane it baffles me
Misleading title. The squad is lacking many quality players. Getting a team that can readily compete with Real, City or the other top sides requires a few more transfer seasons with good to great recruitment.
FourFourTwo yall to fast to post a video, i literraly open youtube to see some highlights about this guy and see that you already drop a video about him
If United does get Hojlund, they won't get him for less than 50m, which is 30-35m less than Atalanta's outrageously overpriced evaluation. That would bring their three signings to a total of about 150m. 55m on Mount, 47mil, Onana and 50mil on Hojlund. The question that the United fanbase should be asking is why spend 150 mil on three when that could have been used on Kane 100m and still have Hojlund for 50mil. As was pointed out, Kane does everything Ten Hag wants.....and he's a proven scorer. I don't by into the financial aspect that is being referenced. Of course you're not going to get any re sale on Kane but you will get goals which is what they were missing last year. When United got Van Persie.....does anyone think they were worried about re sale value. No, they wanted a goal scorer.....and he delivered....and the results.....A prem Title. Kane was the obvious choice and still is the obvious choice. United can't afford to wait for Hojlund, at 20, to develop while competiting against City, Arsenal, a revitalized Liverpool, a revitalized Newcastle and Chelsea. Not to mention the Brentfords and Brightons, who combined were 3-1 against United last year. The truth is, they should have gone after Kane AND Hojlund. Mount and Onana are not going to make up a 36 goal difference to City and 30 goal difference to Arsenal. United score just 2 more goals than 10th place Fulham and no amount of playing out from the back is going to increase that output. Only Goal Scorers do that. United might now play pretty attractive football........BUT CAN"T SCORE GOALS. They need Kane and Hojlund.
This is another Wout Werghost, but an expensive one for that matter. Manchester United have already been defrauded by Mount's transfer. Let them go for Mbappe and Amrabat however expensive they may cost.
I hope you are wrong and I think the kid could be amazing but there's always a chance he will be pony. I would be happy with 10 prem goals and a better contribution towards the teams overall success in the first season.
Is it just me??? Or there is no way❗ Hojlund is the Only CF Option For United, At 60-70 Million.😅😅 Im Getting Sancho Vibes... Raw Overhyped Talent.. Just Get Greenwood Back In The Team😅
I trust ten hag in this but if it was my choice i would go for kane, everyone knows what he is capable of in the league and would be good for at least another 3 years plus with the takeover most likely happening(fingers crossed)who cares about his resale value, hojlund could take a season or two to get going properly or he could hit the ground running and score a pile of goals this season, there is just two mant question marks around him compared to kane and united can't really afford to get this striker purchase wrong imo.
I was so disappointed in Weghorst because he seemed like a great guy and teammate, played hard and did exactly what was asked of him...except score goals. He is exactly the type of veteran player you want helping to lead your club but he just wasn't up to standard. I wish him the best with the rest of his career.
Me too. I thought he would score more goals because he looked like a real goalscorer at wolfsburg. Somehow he was too clumsy at man utd. Can’t hate the guy though, he played his heart out.
I gues ManU caught him in towards the end of his career. A younger Weghorst would have scored more goals then 1…
His Wolfsburg highlights were mint though. I wonder what happened.
His Wolfsburg highlights were mint though. I wonder what happened.
Don't say thay name again, just trying to forget he was even there
All you have to do is think of all the chances Wout missed or couldn’t reach due to speed and you’ll see the massive value he will add.
I think Hojlund will surprise alot of people. He's got all the attributes to become one of the best strikers in the world & under the guidance of Ten Hag who will develop him we'll no doubt have one hell of a talent on our hands. Yes he's still raw but I am glad we're signing him as he's too good a talent to miss out on.
He needs a couple of years tbh but at 20 to have the confidence to come into one of the biggest clubs in the world and be the main man says everything you need to know about him
It was like when we signed Rooney at 18 he wasn’t phased as he knew he would be one of the best players of his generation
@@pabloes588 Exactly that he's only 20 yet his all round game is already very impressive. His goals to minutes ratio is pretty decent aswell considering he's only played 20 full games for Atalanta. If u analyse Hojlund his movement is incredible has alot of pace for a big man holds the ball up well links the play works hard presses well everything Ten Hag wants in his striker Hojlund has got
@@chrissilvester5663 well we’ll give him time to develop but I feel the uk press won’t
He’ll get the old Poundland haaland tag by jurnos who don’t actually know anything
@@pabloes588 Stuff the press man they don't matter. They're always out to criticise us at every oppertunity they get anyway. We've become accustomed to that. What matters is that our own fan base give the lad time & have patience which unfortunately they won't cos they're more obsessed with how much he cost then what he'll bring to the squad
@@chrissilvester5663exactly. I see the potential and I feel he’s what we’ve been missing. We might see him against Forest
Tbh, I wanted Osimhen at first but I guess he's too expensive for us since there's still uncertainty over United's takeover.. Højlund is the best cheaper option we can go for in the entire market, and I'd be glad to have him in the squad.
Osimhen is too overrated man, thid guy Hojlund can become best striker in the world.
We need 2 strikers anyway, could always get Holjund this season and maybe Osimihen next
@@randomgayguymando you not listen? Ten hag wants a striker with good link play. Osimhen is not the guy
Højlund is literally better than Håland
@@IMMERSIVEVOICE What?!? You're delusional
The age of Kane is a fair point, but a lot of the older players listed in the video have gone or will be gone before the start of the season. De Gea, Maguire, Weghorst, Fred. And Eriksen has been replaced in the starting 11 by 24 year old mount. Love your work 👍
Kane is way better than Rasmus. Kane brings in EXPERIENCE, QUALITY and LEADERSHIP! Rasmus will bring in chaos in the dressing room (selfishness, unhealthy competition btw specially btw him and Rashford (Antony)
@@starblacks6329Kane will bring chaos to the dressing room. He will be selfish and reported he would want the same wages as Ronaldo got, and Tottenham wont sell to a pl club. So there
@starblacks6329 Of course Kane is better, nobody would disagree but Levy refuses to sell to a direct rival so what is your point? Also how have you just decided that Hojland will bring chaos, selfishness and competition? That's just bullshit you made up in your own head because it soothed your need to agree with the nonsense in your brain.
Simply making the centre backs defend the box will be transformative.
I got a very good feeling about Hojlund. Ten Hag is going to turn him into a beast. In 2-3 years, everyone will be singing his name. Bruno's holywood passes and Eriksen's precision will give him all the chances that he needs to do what he does best, which is score. Imagine if Weghorst score half of the chances he squandered. He would leave united with at least 7 PL goals. Now imagine having an instinctive goal scorer at the end of such chances for over 30 PL games. This is gonna be an exciting one.
Good to hear you shout out the TIFO irl video. It was one of their best recent vids and one everyone with an opinion on this transfer should watch.
I love it, I hope Ten Hag builts him like Alex and Ronaldo and Pep Guardiola and Messi
The most recent reports suggest that his price is about 50-60 mil pounds which makes him much cheaper than both Kane and Osimen.
so you'd say maybe 80 to 100 million overall for this contract ? compared to 260million for kane
@@BigPeeOfficial Exactly. We need to be patient with him however.
@@Thatdoginme_m3Hojlund is cheaper because he has done nothing. He has not been a prolific scorer anywhere. Couldn't even score in the Danish pub league. Julian Avalrez cost City £14m and he is more accomplished. I don't understand how Hojlund is worth the asking price when he simply hasn't done anything. If he has scored 20 goals I would think he is a little overpriced but I would think he is a top prospect but 9 goals is frankly a joke.
@@almac9203 Alvarez is 24 years old, Hojlund was just 19 last season, most of strikers are still develop under the youth team at that age, only few like Haaland or even Hojlund started to took the light of Europe football at under 19
@@tynn443 utter nonsense argument. Firstly Julian Avalrez is 23 not 24 and secondly he was signed last year at age 22. Haaland was signed at age 21. Secondly I have no problem with Hojlund being a raw prospect however he isn't priced like a raw prospect but is priced like a quality goal scorer which he isn't. Julian Avalrez cost £14m whereas they want £65m for Hojlund who has achieved nothing! I think it is laughable that you inflated the age of Alvarez then pretended Hojlund is younger than he is to exaggerate the age difference. Seriously what has Hojlund done to justify the price Atalanta is asking for? I would say Evan Ferguson is more impressive than Hojlund having performed at least as good if not better than Hojlund and doing it at age 18.
Been wanting this so long. Thanks
Enda kundi
I've gotten more and more convinced about Hojlund the more I learn, still though, he'll be our ONLY proper striker so 🤞 injury-wise.
You can convince yourself on any signing by looking for positives. Doesn't mean he is actually good. Dude scored 9 goals last season. He has never been a prolific goal scorer. Couldn't even score in the Danish pub league. Would be a good prospect at £30m but £65m is a joke
@@almac9203remember this comment guys when he absolutely becomes world class eventually under ten hag
@@jigmeedadul4174 I make no claims about what a player will be in 5 or 10 years time but right now the signing is a joke. He cost a few million more than Goncalo Ramos and Ramos is a way better player. I would wager that Nicholas Jackson will score more goals this season than Hojlund and Jackson cost less than half the money. My previous prediction about Mason Mount is already looking correct so let's see if I am 2 of 2.
Adam is now at four four two?! No way. Nice work Adam.
Great video! One thing you did not said is that ETH loves a striker that presses the opponent.
The inflated prices quoted for him are all coming from British journalists. Alot of the Italian journalists are quoting lower. Can see it being done for around €60mil which I think is reasonable and he should only improve under ETH.
They are not lower, they are corrupted like British ones…
Unfortunately not the case
This comment aged well😶
I love the video very creative and good analysis, concerning Hojlund it is just the asking price from Atalanta they value his over 70 million euros + 10 million euros as add-ons. United as of today 26/07 just presented a verbal bid of 50 million euros and 10 million add-ons which is fair evaluation for a player that hasn't achieved in his career yet.
My concern is that if the deal will be too much United can look up another striker like Goncalo Ramos and Kolo Muani. I would prefer Kane and Hojlund this summer but not sure that deal can be made
Nice video.ManU fans really hope "Hojlund" shines..
Unlike Martial these past few years, the club has stabilized enough on the football side that I think Hojlund could be molded into a striker that will serve us well
Wonder if ten Hag is still interested in getting that Tadic esque false 9 to offer something different from a more traditional 9. He was interested in Gakpo back in January but didn't have the funds and he has been playing Sancho in that role this preseason
Vlahovic : *exists*
In all seriousness though, super hyped for Hojlund, i firmly believe that he's going to looked back on be a key signing of the Ten Hag era
Vlahovic is a fine player when working within the penalty box. He does make good use of his strong frame and good finishing to put chances away. However, Vlahovic tends to take a lot of low-quality shots and is not the most comfortable when asked to drop deep and link play in the way Ten Hag often looks for in a striker.
Fast forward a few days and with the whole price with all the add ons included he is already an 80million striker
I was really waiting for this video
Imagine Sancho at the 8, having to go into challenges and put a proper shift in every match. Never gonna happen.
Sancho dont want to crease the new boots aye 😂
Yeah ...
He was doing well as a false 9 replacement during the Arsenal friendly. Was dropping down all the way to the halfway line and combining well with Mount.
Quality breakdown
Ferguson would be cheaper ??? It’s Brighton, and he’s just signed a new deal . They’d asked for 200 mil and wouldn’t even start negotiations for less than 100. They’ve just turned down 80 million for Caicedo, a player with the same length deal and a much more common profile on the market
He seems a great signing, also if we get a new owner at some stage probably not this window but the next, what is to stop us then buying oshimen to go along side hojlund
Probably the fact that two out and out strikers have not been used in a winning side since about 2000 mate. You will be calling for a Vinny Jones style hatchet man in midfield next😂😂😂
He is coming to MUFC... If ETH and his team manages to get best out of incredible potential then the glory days will surely return to theatre of dreams.
Only reason I would say the glory days won’t return for you is because there is so much competition with teams capable of winning now. City, Liverpool, Chelsea, Newcastle, Arsenal…
I really don't think Ferguson would even be cheaper as he just signed a new deal and has prem experience which immediately increases the price, not to mention Brighton's not looking to sell and are pretty flush (relatively speaking) after some recent deals. And lastly they are still being approached for caicedo so probably don't want the added hassle of looking for a Ferguson replacement as well, especially now undav has gone on loan
Ur a funny presenter bro😅I like watching ur shows
What's his name? He makes the videos very fun to watch!
Højlund
Greenwood
Martial
Options for 9
Ideally we need Kane houjland and a CDm/cm back up like amrabat along with a CB too tbh and next season I suspect we'll be in need of a new lb and RB too
If we can sign Kane on a loan from Spurs, he can be out 30+ goals man this season. He can even help Hojlund understand the PL better and could be vital in adapting to the PL and it's standards. (learning from the best) Besides that, we need a new CB and probably move in for Amrabat.
Had our 'wonderful' current 'owners' been able to sell the club in a reasonable timeframe (it's all about the money, let's face it), then perhaps one of the other two established players you mentioned would have been chased more seriously, and possibly Hojlund/Ferguson targeted too. But we don't have owners who can do anything in any reasonable timeframe and certainly not in the interests of the football club, so here we are. I hope if Hojlund comes in, he isn't a Forlan signing.
I think it's a FFP thing as well.
I want this kid BAD. I think we will get him for 65 million.
Hes shit tho🙈 kolo muani for 70m is w much better option
I firmly believe Ferguson would be more expensive. It's Brighton, he's British and again it's Brighton.
Jesus, again? Romano said 70M euros, that's 60M quid, Osimhen is double that, Kane is 100M, plus we can probably get him for 50 plus 10 on add ons, plus Hojlund just turned 20.
Hojlund has done nothing to justify his fee. Julian Avalrez is better and he cost City £14m. Let that sink in. This guy has scored goals anywhere.
@@almac9203 here we go with the kindergarden argument, oh my toy is better.
@@darthplagueis8886 Over £60m for an unproven prospect. Antony another guy that did nothing to justify €100m. Ask yourself why! The only kindergarten kids are the guys running United
Of course having Kane or Osimhen would be great.
But ETH couldn't care less.
Get kids, make them good/great and follow a long term plan.
Man Utd couldn't compete for the title next season with Osimhen or Kane.
ETH wants to build a team for his 3rd season at the club.
Still dreaming..
❤❤ appreciate
Don't be surprised that
T Greenwood is far much better than his lad when given time.
Why are manchester holding back the garnacho 23/24 shirts?
They want a modern Mark Hughes then.
Literally any decent/semi decent striker would suffice. Taremi, Iheanacho, Scamaca, Milik.. Literally anyone would be an upgrade over the sum 0 strikers united have.
Not sure who I prefer hojlund or ferguson they both have hugh potential but kane is needed ans the most logic option but we dont wanna deal with levy and for some reason spend 60 mil on mount but not an extra few million for kane it baffles me
Levy won't sell to a rival, its as simple as that.
Misleading title. The squad is lacking many quality players. Getting a team that can readily compete with Real, City or the other top sides requires a few more transfer seasons with good to great recruitment.
FourFourTwo yall to fast to post a video, i literraly open youtube to see some highlights about this guy and see that you already drop a video about him
There is one more option united can go for..Kolo Muani
Hyper expensive.
His wages are already agreed at 75k a week.....Romano
United are willing to pay 60 for Hojlund although Atalanta want 70. Not sure where you get 100 from?
Rashford and that turd Antony will not be providing crosses
But dalot and shaw fill that role. Rashford and Antony aren't expected to
Antony?! Nah.
If United does get Hojlund, they won't get him for less than 50m, which is 30-35m less than Atalanta's outrageously overpriced evaluation. That would bring their three signings to a total of about 150m. 55m on Mount, 47mil, Onana and 50mil on Hojlund. The question that the United fanbase should be asking is why spend 150 mil on three when that could have been used on Kane 100m and still have Hojlund for 50mil. As was pointed out, Kane does everything Ten Hag wants.....and he's a proven scorer. I don't by into the financial aspect that is being referenced. Of course you're not going to get any re sale on Kane but you will get goals which is what they were missing last year. When United got Van Persie.....does anyone think they were worried about re sale value. No, they wanted a goal scorer.....and he delivered....and the results.....A prem Title. Kane was the obvious choice and still is the obvious choice. United can't afford to wait for Hojlund, at 20, to develop while competiting against City, Arsenal, a revitalized Liverpool, a revitalized Newcastle and Chelsea. Not to mention the Brentfords and Brightons, who combined were 3-1 against United last year. The truth is, they should have gone after Kane AND Hojlund. Mount and Onana are not going to make up a 36 goal difference to City and 30 goal difference to Arsenal. United score just 2 more goals than 10th place Fulham and no amount of playing out from the back is going to increase that output. Only Goal Scorers do that. United might now play pretty attractive football........BUT CAN"T SCORE GOALS. They need Kane and Hojlund.
ETH has a wild card up his sleeve.
greenwood.
Evan Ferguson would not be cheaper 😂
This is another Wout Werghost, but an expensive one for that matter. Manchester United have already been defrauded by Mount's transfer. Let them go for Mbappe and Amrabat however expensive they may cost.
I hope you are wrong and I think the kid could be amazing but there's always a chance he will be pony. I would be happy with 10 prem goals and a better contribution towards the teams overall success in the first season.
With 9 goals in 30games? I disagree
Wait, didn't you used to do Wrestling?
Lol at those deluded thinking United problems will be resolved with a striker 😂😂😂
would've loved Osihmen
Stop fantasizing on nothing..
Hojlund has no physicality bro. I saw him get bullied by opemacano when Denmark played france not long ago.
😂😂😂😂 Scoted 10 goals last season and you think hell come to the Premier League and s ore 30 goals a season 😂😂😂😂😂
Wearing a PSG shirt to discuss Rasmus Højlund. Wishful thinking?
Hot takes,hojlund is weghorst lite
Clear of tap in merchant Haaland.
Man said Chris Smalling was his toughest opponent. Good luck against Gabriel and Saliba!!
The same gabriel that looked like Maguire’s older brother against Sancho 💀
@@JusticeDike92 1 miss kick in preseason doesn’t make you like maguire. You have to do it consistently over 3 seasons to be in his family👑
Fantasies…
Another signing another flop just because he has h and land in his name doesn’t mean he’s great
Go watch soccer
Is it just me??? Or there is no way❗ Hojlund is the Only CF Option For United, At 60-70 Million.😅😅
Im Getting Sancho Vibes... Raw Overhyped Talent.. Just Get Greenwood Back In The Team😅
Sancho at least had some record of success before joining United. What has Hojlund done? He is more similar to Antony.
@@almac9203 Exactly I don't exactly detest Antony I'd give him two years.. but we always seem to corner ourselves 🤦🤦🤦
I trust ten hag in this but if it was my choice i would go for kane, everyone knows what he is capable of in the league and would be good for at least another 3 years plus with the takeover most likely happening(fingers crossed)who cares about his resale value, hojlund could take a season or two to get going properly or he could hit the ground running and score a pile of goals this season, there is just two mant question marks around him compared to kane and united can't really afford to get this striker purchase wrong imo.