SC Hears Requests Over Same-Sex Marriage, Led by CJI DY Chandrachud

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ธ.ค. 2024
  • The Supreme Court is hearing requests seeking legal recognition of same-sex marriages. The Supreme Court has set up a five-judge Constitution bench to hear petitions seeking legal recognition of same-sex marriages. The bench set up by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud comprises Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Ravindra Bhat, Hima Kohli and PS Narasimha, besides the CJI.
    #supremecourtlive #samesexmarriages #supremecourthearing
    Watch Out Our Weekly Shows:
    Explained: • Express Explained In 6...
    Political Pulse: • Political Pulse
    Subscribe to Indian Express: goo.gl/RjJrX0
    Express Economist: • The Express Economist
    The Indian Express Online covers all trending and latest news across India, which includes daily news, political news, gadgets and Mobile reviews, technology updates, Entertainment News, Bollywood news, public opinions and views on daily trends.
    Connect with us:
    Facebook: / indianexpress
    Twitter: / indianexpress
    Indian Express App: indianexpress.c...
    Official Website: indianexpress.... Today's Indian Express newspaper offers a comprehensive package of news, including Indian Express editorial analysis and Indian Express analysis today. This well-respected publication covers a wide range of topics in its India Express editorial and Indian Express news sections. Stay informed with the Indian Express newspaper today.

ความคิดเห็น • 298

  • @lovelifehappiness2409
    @lovelifehappiness2409 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    Arguments in the favor of legalization of same-sex marriage: 1. India is not a parliamentary democracy like UK where parliament is supreme. It's a constitutional democracy where constitution is supreme. So, even parliament can not amend the basic features of our constitution called as Basic Structure Doctrine. 2. Equality is a part of Basic Structure Doctrine accepted in Indira Sawhney Case(2000). Sexual Orientation is a part of 'sex' mentioned under Article 14, Article 15 interpreted by SC in Navtej Singh Johar Case. Right to marriage is a Fundamental Right under Article 19 & Article 21 interpreted by SC in Shafin Jahan Vs Asokan KM (Hadiya Case). Taking away marriage rights from a class of citizens is violation of fundamental rights given under Article 14, 15, 19 & 21 to citizens of India. In case of violation of fundamental right, individuals will go to SC under Article 32 and not Parliament for protection of their fundamental Rights( Petitioners have done the same in this case. ) 3. Marriage is not something only about having sex and procreation. Do we nullify heterosexual marriage which don't procreate? It's more about love, partnership, making decisions for each other, companionship etc. Marriage is part of expression and taking it from certain individuals dehumanize them. It also severely affect their health, life, dignity etc. Does we make a better society by dehumanizing certain individuals of our own society? Doesn't it lead to brain drain when they are forced to migrate to other countries because they get their basic rights and acceptance there? 4. In one of the interpretations of Marriage in Hinduism, it's about the union of two souls. When did soul have any gender? 4. Having a particular sexual orientation is not a matter of choice. If yes when did majority choose to become heterosexual and feel certain way? Do we create our own feelings? And if it's a choice why will someone choose to be from LGBTQIA+ for getting so much hatred, insecurity, alienation, exclusion etc? 5. For the people calling it unnatural, what is nature exactly? Even our clothes which we wear are not natural. Even the youtube on which we are watching and reading comments is not natural. Are we so repelled to man-made things? And what makes one way of having sex natural and other unnatural? Scientific community like WHO, Indian Psychiatric Association etc. have approved it as totally normal and natural after research. Similar relations have been found in many other species(nature). 6. For the people asking for going through education, awareness, sensitization- It's because of awareness only that today we are discussing about it. The first pride march took place in 1999 in Kolkata. It's the efforts of many people and awareness only through which SC could give a favorable judgement in 2018 without much strong social reaction. We all must have seen pride marches being held in different part of cities across India. Inclusion of Trans people in NCERT curriculum was another example of such attempt which was opposed and taken back. Legal route is just one way of multipronged approach. 7. Coming to common people of India which doesn't limit only to few metropolitan cities, they don't understand even subtle differences between Legislature, Executive and Judiciary. Do they cease to exist? And does parliamentarians ask everything from them during their day to day operations? And who will cause complete havoc? ( "Kya hai Dakshin, Kya hai Wam, Janta ko Roti se Kaam" - Baba Nagarjun ) 8. Shikhandi in Mahabharata was a trans person most of us will be aware of. As a society how have we progressed? What about their rights? We can't find even basic infrastructure such as toilets for them at public places. We don't have even dignified words for them. Why did we fail to acknowledge their rights despite their existence since history? and whom shall they approach for their rights? 9. Post independence example- Ambedkar faced the similar opposition for Widow Remarriage and Intercaste marriage while presenting Hindu Marriage Bill in the parliament which petitioners are facing today with the same argument in the name of customs, traditions and readiness of society.

    • @dheerajpimoli9539
      @dheerajpimoli9539 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      You cannot treat same sex union in same manner as heterosex union. marriage is uniquely heterosex ceremony created for these couple but if due to this same sex union are in disadvantage position then that should be done separately

    • @babuprakash4898
      @babuprakash4898 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well said 🙌👏

    • @iloveyself267
      @iloveyself267 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This was so insightful and eye-opening.

    • @nashtrashcool
      @nashtrashcool ปีที่แล้ว +3

      When same sex marriage will not have same provisions of property inheritance then why is there a need to marry and over-register this stuff on courts? When you can live in-house relationships, and since we are copy pasting everything with logic, so let us look at the demerits as well, 1. Very frequent change in parter. There's a study on this . 2. For 0.1% (naturally even for other animals) you will change the law now?

    • @iloveyself267
      @iloveyself267 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ​@@nashtrashcool it is the legal recognition that the queer couples are asking for. There are still being stigmatized in the society which eventually is a restriction in their freedom, and hampers the concept of equality as per the fundamental rights.
      In simple words, it is about 'Live and let others live.'

  • @sarthakc5224
    @sarthakc5224 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I dont know the name of the person who is giving speech in 23:43 ... He is a gem of a human being ...

  • @floatinsun
    @floatinsun ปีที่แล้ว +10

    First remove the word mylord from debate 😅😮 ... We need progress from British era.

    • @princedewett8584
      @princedewett8584 ปีที่แล้ว

      We haven't progressed yet, 😂 or we can't

  • @lovelifehappiness2409
    @lovelifehappiness2409 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    I strongly condemn Central government for this inappropriate action,
    Government must be equal to every human being, LGBTQ community are not from different planet,
    They are also born here, They born in India, There is a proof in Science, that LGBTQ feelings will start raising once baby is in Womb itself,
    If this is the case, Why LGBTQ community need to suffer, Let them enjoy equal rights of humanity,
    More than humanity nothing exists. Moreover this debt is purely like a Veg vs Nonveg food lovers.
    Its purely your wish whether what type of food which you are supposed to eat,
    I strongly agree, its upto consensus of adults. Here Government has zero rights to interfere,
    Instead support marginalized society, This gives a good healthy society,
    Marriage is not just for a wish of Society or Government or Stereotype, Instead Marriage should be from heart.
    All Heterosexual people, please be minded, tomorrow there is a chance that your own daughter or son may become homosexual,
    then you will understand about the real pain, Spread love, not hatred,
    This earth is equally for everyone whether they are homo or heterosexual, Court definitely give solid judgement to approve homosexual marriage.

    • @astrotech541
      @astrotech541 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      In simple words 90%of the politicians are like old monks waiting for their funeral, how can they understand us😂

    • @akshatchawla3
      @akshatchawla3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don’t understand why people do not understand basic science and sociology. Homosexuals have been existing from a long time. Moreover, two people who have each other’s consent should be allowed to do anything they want, unless they’re harming anyone else.

    • @Explorewithrv2023
      @Explorewithrv2023 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Right!

    • @rakshithac3520
      @rakshithac3520 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lol we dont want to entertain BS thats all.

    • @basantitanga3631
      @basantitanga3631 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      First claim to be Unique and cry to be recognised. Then play victim card and demand equal rights. What a bunch of Hypocrites.

  • @taj____
    @taj____ ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Love will eventually win 💗

    • @nashtrashcool
      @nashtrashcool ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You mean live-in will eventually win.

    • @youawesome2068
      @youawesome2068 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are probably the same kind of person also who thinks young adults still using bounce houses is okay too.,

    • @jarp5581
      @jarp5581 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You mean sexual desire will win ???

    • @anirbansadhukhan4681
      @anirbansadhukhan4681 ปีที่แล้ว

      Depravity is not love.

    • @dipakjadar6713
      @dipakjadar6713 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Go marry a dog 😂

  • @amitdahiya4927
    @amitdahiya4927 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Love is love 🏳️‍🌈

    • @IMADHAV7
      @IMADHAV7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Water is water.....

    • @youawesome2068
      @youawesome2068 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are probably the same kind of person also who thinks young adults still using bounce houses is okay too..,

    • @jarp5581
      @jarp5581 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I think it's sexual lust

    • @Rohan-ej2cq
      @Rohan-ej2cq ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@jarp5581 Like Heterosexual don't have Sexual lust stop this 'Holier than thou' attitude.

    • @anirbansadhukhan4681
      @anirbansadhukhan4681 ปีที่แล้ว

      Depravity is not love. Don't corrupt young people.

  • @Indianlegalprofessional
    @Indianlegalprofessional ปีที่แล้ว +10

    If same sex marriage is considered, then many people struggling in darkness will find a better and descent way of life. Many people falsely engaging in marriages due to family pressure will come out of the hypocrisies of the society. Other legal issues arising out of matter may find proper redressal in due course of time. Queer is a new way of life nowadays. Except it or not, no one can deny its existence and rights.

  • @lightningfury2051
    @lightningfury2051 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Samaj ka koi tension nhi hai yeh tho government samne araha hai logo ka soch Aaj kal bohot badal chuka hai ,hamari soch badalna hai bas need some times .. Honorable supreme court judges give a good decisions 🙏

  • @samayh5749
    @samayh5749 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Parliament is not doing anything and rights of many Indians are infringed from very long. Everyone is equal and that is beauty of democracy.

  • @vikramaditya6812
    @vikramaditya6812 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Atleast allow civil unions.

  • @jadoodilip
    @jadoodilip ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Its ironical that Supreme Court being so liberal in its views doesn't show liberal views in collegium system. Let's stretch the band a bit more, why even have the institution of marriage, why not allow to have no-fault divorce, why not have gender neutral laws. After all it is one's fundamental right to be treated equal irrespective of gender, have the ability to break away from marriage at will and at no fault at all.

  • @beautifulmind2797
    @beautifulmind2797 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    💙💚💛💜💞💝💛💜💗💙💚💞💟💖💙💚💚💚💙💚woo fantastic . Hum chinke lenge ajadi. ✊✊✊✊❤thank u so much sc mr. Chandruchur

    • @youawesome2068
      @youawesome2068 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are probably the same kind of person also who thinks young adults still using bounce houses is okay too 😊

  • @KajuKhundia
    @KajuKhundia ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love is love

  • @indianlgbtqworld
    @indianlgbtqworld ปีที่แล้ว +3

    ✍️✍️✍️जो लोग समलैंगिक शादी के खिलाफ है उन लोगों.. को मेरा जावाबी सन्देश...
    आप ग़लत हो ..देश कि परम्परा संस्कृति समाज समय के स्थित के साथ बदलता आ रहा आज के समय में बच्चो को गोद लिया जा सकता है जब पहले के समय में बच्चे पति के मर जाने पर ऋषि के प्रसाद से पैदा हो जाते थे ,तो आज के समय में बच्चे सवरगेसी और स्पर्म डोनर परिक्रिया से हो सकते हैं...हम कोई आतंकवादी नहीं है , हम भी इन्सान है जिस तरह आपको महिलाओं मे रूचि है उसी तरह हमें पुरुषो में , ,, खाना सब खाते है किसी को दाल पसंद है तो किसी को आलू ...उसी तरह हमारी रूची अलग है ,तो हमारे साथ अमानवीय व्यवहार किया जाता है हम सिर्फ सममानत का अधिकार चाहते हैं,, हमे कोई सपोर्ट नहीं करता ना ही परिवार, समाज, धर्म और बहुत बार देश भी नहीं ..हमारी लाइफ काफी समस्याओ से भरी हुई है,, हमें शादी की कानून मान्यता के लिए सरकार, समाज, धर्म सबसे लड़ना पड़ रहा है,,, और आप के लिए यह कोई समस्या नहीं है.. सोचिये अगर आप से शादी करना और फैमिली बनने अधिकार छीन लिया जाये तो कैसी होगी आपकी लाइफ एक समय बाद ना तो आपकी कोई फैमिली नहीं होगी और आप मानसिक रूप से अकेला महसूस करेंगे आपके लिए जीवन घुटन भरा हो जायेगा.. आखिर में यही कहुंगा हमें मानवता के द्रष्टिकोण से देखें.. हम ही एक दूसरे का सहारा बनते हैं और आज के समय में शादी का मतलब सिर्फ , बच्चे पैदा करना नहीं है दो इन्सान एक दूसरे के साथ से अपनी लाइफ गुजारना चाहते हैं,,हम जब अस्पताल ,जोब, और सरकारी कामकाज में हमारी फैमिली और हमारे र्पार्टनर के बारे में पुछा जाता है तो हमारे पास कोई जवाब नहीं होता इसलिए हमें शादी के लिए कानून मान्यता चाहिए....आप लोग के लिए यहां किसी पर नकारात्मक टिप्पणी करना बहुत आसान है पर आप शायद नहीं जानते आपके इस अधुरे ज्ञान कि वजह से समाज में हमारी छावी खराब होती है, और हमारे समुदाय के बहुत से लोग यह सहन नहीं कर पाते और अवसाद में डूब जाते हैं , कुछ लोग अपने जीवन का अन्त कर लेते हैं ... कृपया इस विषय के बारे में , टिप्पणी, करने या बोलने से पहले इस विषय का अच्छे से अध्ययन करे ,, समलैंगिकता जब से ही है ,जब से जीवन की शुरूवात हुई यह प्रकृति और हर धर्म,जाति,देश समाज में मौजूद हैं क्योंकि हम इन्सानियत और जीवन का हिस्सा है
    🙏तो मानवता, के लिए कृपया हमें सपोर्ट करे
    #humanity #equality

    • @trueword4971
      @trueword4971 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tumhari desh ki sanskriti muglo ki den hain.

  • @hokughazhimomi3666
    @hokughazhimomi3666 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "If they can get themselves pregnant & give birth to humans they may marry"
    The Person posing as female should not exercise the right of a woman in particular or man.

    • @hokughazhimomi3666
      @hokughazhimomi3666 ปีที่แล้ว

      They have all the Rights in the World as a Human being.. but Righting the Wrong by Legislation will be a terrible Blunder in human history.

  • @hokughazhimomi3666
    @hokughazhimomi3666 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "No Hindu God or Goddesses ever married same sex"

    • @baldeevsingh5815
      @baldeevsingh5815 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Check your knowledge

    • @EightTuber
      @EightTuber ปีที่แล้ว +1

      correct your knowledge bro

    • @Tsewang_Lachenpa
      @Tsewang_Lachenpa ปีที่แล้ว +2

      My friend is hindu and he had married with his boyfriend, here in India and our state govt has no objection to them, and they work as social workers who helps Poor's.

    • @anushkaa28
      @anushkaa28 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly.

  • @rathnakarshetty18
    @rathnakarshetty18 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mr chandrachud has no time to listen to the plight of Kashmir Pandits?? He is not worried about innumerable cases pending for decades in the courts? We don't care if you are Mr or Ms Chandrachud. Whoever you are, better think of these pending cases as well

    • @thomassamuel9388
      @thomassamuel9388 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think it is because his children are abnormal and handicapped so he knows no men will marry them.

  • @PritamBorase
    @PritamBorase ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Inappropriate action

  • @riyazgupta9559
    @riyazgupta9559 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Love will win ❤️🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈

    • @youawesome2068
      @youawesome2068 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are probably the same kind of person also who thinks young adults still using bounce houses is okay too..,

    • @jarp5581
      @jarp5581 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Love lolll😂😂😂
      Lust bolo 😂

    • @sandyketchum5386
      @sandyketchum5386 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wonder why these heterosexuals are so obsessed with sex talk. Two people want to have a peaceful married life and all you got to say about that is what happens in the bedroom. That says more about you than the people you are discriminating against.

    • @Tsewang_Lachenpa
      @Tsewang_Lachenpa ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@youawesome2068 Ya, I love lgtbq

    • @Tsewang_Lachenpa
      @Tsewang_Lachenpa ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jarp5581 Then ur parents married for lust.

  • @godblessyou9036
    @godblessyou9036 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mujhe English nei aata please koi muje batayega Kya faisala hua???

    • @IMADHAV7
      @IMADHAV7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Koi decision nhi hua hai abhi hor hearings hongi
      And agar tum is ko suport nhi krte to 🤝

    • @anupamsharma98
      @anupamsharma98 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gand marana galat hai ya sahi. Bus usi par hai

  • @theoptimisticbanker5001
    @theoptimisticbanker5001 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Love is love ❤️

    • @youawesome2068
      @youawesome2068 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are probably the same kind of person also who thinks young adults still using bounce houses is okay too.,,,

    • @jarp5581
      @jarp5581 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lust is Lust
      Love lol 😂

    • @anirbansadhukhan4681
      @anirbansadhukhan4681 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are confusing sexual depravity with love.

    • @Nikhil-fs4oq
      @Nikhil-fs4oq ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@anirbansadhukhan4681 haan tumhara love love hai aur humaare love ko lust aur depravity bolte ho...what a conservative retard u are🙏

    • @SuperKing604
      @SuperKing604 ปีที่แล้ว

      People love there pets to

  • @mhh87181
    @mhh87181 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    let see what happens, leave it to the supreme court, I trust my Indian brothers and sisters, whether Muslim, hindu, sikh or Christian, we will not let anything to force us to be behaving in a certain way against social values and Law of nature,to please 0.1% or I say exceptionals 🤝

    • @vishrutisingh
      @vishrutisingh ปีที่แล้ว +6

      And who decided these "Laws of nature"?

  • @vamsimohan02
    @vamsimohan02 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When asked about the collegium system of judiciary and its problems, CJI suggested the current system is the best one but the problems associated can be corrected through other means.
    Taking the same analogy, shouldn't we be addressing the lgbtq problems without amending the marriage system, but genuinely through other means.
    Some of the genuine means I think of are, a. Educating the people, both lgbtq and the rest of others, b. Strict implementation of the Law and order in this regard, c. Making specific amendments to laws such as adoption, inheritance, tax laws etc. without legalizing the marriage.

  • @abhinavsalgunan1337
    @abhinavsalgunan1337 ปีที่แล้ว

    can anyone give me argument in favour of legalization of same-sex marriage?

  • @inderneilboseroychowdhury
    @inderneilboseroychowdhury ปีที่แล้ว

    If this might curb the out of control over population & ongoing corruption down there 🤔🤣

  • @baldeevsingh5815
    @baldeevsingh5815 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I hope gay marriage will be legal....❤

    • @Tsewang_Lachenpa
      @Tsewang_Lachenpa ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is only written on paper that it is not allowed, actually my male friend married with his boyfriend and now live peacefully, and I don't have problems.

    • @princedewett8584
      @princedewett8584 ปีที่แล้ว

      It should not be legal in India, open your closed mind.

    • @youawesome2068
      @youawesome2068 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are probably the same kind of person also who thinks young adults still using bounce houses is okay too

    • @Tsewang_Lachenpa
      @Tsewang_Lachenpa ปีที่แล้ว

      @@youawesome2068 What's the connection between same sex marriage & bouncing house.?

    • @Tsewang_Lachenpa
      @Tsewang_Lachenpa ปีที่แล้ว

      @@princedewett8584 Why it shouldn't be legal in India, what is the consequences of it.?

  • @mukundha7621
    @mukundha7621 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    India has so many issues we have a court with people who want gay marriage and woke ideology sad state of affairs

    • @surajrathod9727
      @surajrathod9727 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      This is also an issue Mr
      Waise bhi jo khud nakam hai apne life mai woh kya samjhe issues ki garima

    • @redking4142
      @redking4142 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@surajrathod9727 how is this an issue ? Why this lgtv community wanted to be accepted by the sane people so much, but they reject any criticism we have over them ?

    • @surajrathod9727
      @surajrathod9727 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@redking4142 they are not saying that you accept them but they are asking their rights of marriage my many friends are living together as couple from past several years so what should you expect from them that they now get separated from eachother and sadly get married to opposite sex just because marriage rights is only for heterosexual not homosexual
      Im not that much mean to impose my belief system forcefully on someone

    • @Suniana085
      @Suniana085 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@surajrathod9727 so who has stopped them by living together? Let them live together? LGBT has already been decriminalised right? Then why specific demand for marriage?

    • @redking4142
      @redking4142 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@surajrathod9727 sun bina brain cells ke aadmi, ek baar chadrachud ke arguments sun phir ye virtue signalling diyo,
      Chandrachud said and I quote 'no absolute concept of 'Man' or 'Woman' based on genitals'.
      Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, said, "Biological man means man with biological genitals...If I have genitals of a man but otherwise I am a woman, as being suggested, how will I be treated under CrPC? As a woman? Can I be called for 160 statement? There are several issues."
      Ab bta if I associate as a woman as per Chandrachud mai dowry case kar sakta hu kya apni wife pe ?
      Also they are going to make changes into Hindu marriage act kyuki if they try to change personal laws of other religions, gardan par khatra ho sakta hai unki.

  • @highesped6121
    @highesped6121 ปีที่แล้ว

    Irregularities same sex married. Let's no approve.

  • @Zaiaurangzaib
    @Zaiaurangzaib ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Old people making decisions for young generations.

    • @nashtrashcool
      @nashtrashcool ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We r Yaang generation saar we r independent 😠😠

    • @Tsewang_Lachenpa
      @Tsewang_Lachenpa ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Absolutely, old people old mindset.😂

    • @nashtrashcool
      @nashtrashcool ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Tsewang_Lachenpa Yes

    • @ajitsaikia7719
      @ajitsaikia7719 ปีที่แล้ว

      Coz they are not delusional

  • @drpop_25
    @drpop_25 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    🤞🏻🌈

    • @mortisdeus
      @mortisdeus ปีที่แล้ว

      Your dad is gay?

    • @beautifulmind2797
      @beautifulmind2797 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      💙💚💛💜💞💝💛💜💗💙💚💞💟💖💙💚💚💚💙💚woo fantastic . Hum chinke lenge ajadi. ✊✊✊✊❤

    • @youawesome2068
      @youawesome2068 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fun is fun, why not allow adults to use bounce houses??

    • @sarthakc5224
      @sarthakc5224 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@youawesome2068 You love bouncing houses.. get one which can pick your strength... its fine if you want to bounce houses...

    • @Tsewang_Lachenpa
      @Tsewang_Lachenpa ปีที่แล้ว

      @@youawesome2068 😂 my friend had alerdy married with his boyfriend and has not regrets and, from that they live in India.

  • @kaushikshill5088
    @kaushikshill5088 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈

    • @youawesome2068
      @youawesome2068 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are probably the same kind of person also who thinks young adults still using bounce houses is okay too.,,

    • @mrtraveller11111
      @mrtraveller11111 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sare gand me gussa le

    • @Tsewang_Lachenpa
      @Tsewang_Lachenpa ปีที่แล้ว

      @@youawesome2068 Every one has its own opinions, and I respect evey one

  • @beautifulmind2797
    @beautifulmind2797 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    💙💚💛💜💞💝💛💜💗💙💚💞💟💖💙💚💚💚💙💚woo fantastic . Hum chinke lenge ajadi. ✊✊✊✊❤rainbow is only LOVE.

  • @bishanghosh7923
    @bishanghosh7923 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I need gay marriage anyone here for me

    • @IMADHAV7
      @IMADHAV7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      You're father is there for you

    • @neerajemanuel7771
      @neerajemanuel7771 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@IMADHAV7 LAMO!! I died at this!! 🤣🤣

    • @youawesome2068
      @youawesome2068 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are probably the same kind of person also who thinks young adults still using bounce houses is okay too

    • @sarthakc5224
      @sarthakc5224 ปีที่แล้ว

      We are here for you !! We will make it happen... if marriage is denied.... we will ask for legal civil union. PERIOD

    • @sarthakc5224
      @sarthakc5224 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@IMADHAV7 Yes he is there for him, who is there for you ? Your bai 'house servant'????

  • @MrG_11
    @MrG_11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What a waste of valuable judicial time.

  • @princedewett8584
    @princedewett8584 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "Next day" they will say that they have to marry with an animal. Nothing else, it's just a small issue.

  • @amitmishra568
    @amitmishra568 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Lords please listen to the plea to improve the criminal justice system...it seems you guys have plenty of time for non serious pleas

    • @vishnukumarkr3499
      @vishnukumarkr3499 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      4.5 crore cases pending. Including rape murder Dacoity and such serious cases.

    • @gadhathachappilly1257
      @gadhathachappilly1257 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      It's probably not serious for you coz you have no stake in this. But for some of us, it changes over lives, it can give me a family and dignity

    • @nashtrashcool
      @nashtrashcool ปีที่แล้ว

      Apparently these people cannot live without govt validation, stampyfying there marriage as legal, because on societal terms it will be always null and void. Kek this is why they are turning to supreme kotha.

    • @iloveyself267
      @iloveyself267 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, everyone seems to be busy that they can't just use their brains or think or write properly.

    • @amitmishra568
      @amitmishra568 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@iloveyself267 yes brain comes with marriage within the same sex....i certainly don't have it...

  • @basantitanga3631
    @basantitanga3631 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    In case of gay marriage who will get the protection of IPC 498a?? 🤣😂🤣😂

  • @vikashpratapsingh6586
    @vikashpratapsingh6586 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Say no to same sex marriage

    • @Tsewang_Lachenpa
      @Tsewang_Lachenpa ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But, people are alerdy married, now how can u say no to same sex marriage.😂😂 So funny

    • @Nikhil-fs4oq
      @Nikhil-fs4oq ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Keep crying legal hone vala hai ab toh😂

    • @Tsewang_Lachenpa
      @Tsewang_Lachenpa ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Nikhil-fs4oq Even without legal, my friend had married with his boyfriend here in India 3 month ago, i respect them. 👍
      Now they are about to adopt baby 🍼

    • @Nikhil-fs4oq
      @Nikhil-fs4oq ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Tsewang_Lachenpa Haan na yeh homophobes bas social media pe hate failaate hai faltu ka....real mein agar gays ke against bola abhi ke zamaane mei toh chappal padhenge inko😂😂....even here in mumbai society is so accepting to me and my bf we don't feel any problems from friends or society

    • @Tsewang_Lachenpa
      @Tsewang_Lachenpa ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Nikhil-fs4oq That society called educated society, not that society that carry old thinking. I respect your relationship.👍

  • @baqirhemraj7639
    @baqirhemraj7639 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Let me clear the suspense, the Supreme Court will vote for same-sex marriage. The question is does Constitution allow the same-sex marriage? If it explicitly did, then the Supreme Court would have affirmed it, but it does not. So the question is how to interpret the constitution in such a way that same-sex is allowed. The contrary argument would also be valid. Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code rightly on Unnatural offences states: "Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine" and should remain so in my opinion.

    • @Law_aspirant
      @Law_aspirant ปีที่แล้ว

      But this cannot be unnatural offence in direct sense.. Supreme court here looking at the fundamental rights in which marriage comes .. We have right to marry any person despite of caste, sex, religion etc.. Any thing matters is that only the person shall be a person....

    • @Law_aspirant
      @Law_aspirant ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes but there can be a problem because of this same sex marriage.
      It can unbalance the rule that is require to maintain a respectful society.

    • @baqirhemraj7639
      @baqirhemraj7639 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Law_aspirant What about my fundamental right to be educated, get a job, own property and raise a family? Will I ever, and most of us, be able to fulfil those dreams?

    • @rintu4569
      @rintu4569 ปีที่แล้ว

      Section 377 is outlawed 5 years ago lol.

    • @baqirhemraj7639
      @baqirhemraj7639 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rintu4569 Yes, but what was the provision of section 377? Section 377 of the British colonial penal code criminalized all sexual acts "against the order of nature.".It did serve its purpose and should be retained to prevent the God-fearing society in India from becoming morally abhorrent.

  • @hokughazhimomi3666
    @hokughazhimomi3666 ปีที่แล้ว

    Marriage by defination according to religion is... Holy matrimony joining a man and a woman .

    • @Tsewang_Lachenpa
      @Tsewang_Lachenpa ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My friend had married with his boyfriend in here in India, and live peacefully,. Our state govt have no objection to them, they also helps Poor's.

    • @trueword4971
      @trueword4971 ปีที่แล้ว

      Marriage is a legal sex contract nothing holy within it

  • @AlHassanKhan-894
    @AlHassanKhan-894 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    कौ़म ए लूत जैसा कहर क्यों लाना चाहती ये क़ौम अपने ऊपर ?😢

    • @Dhiraj-May8
      @Dhiraj-May8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tu jaake cow ka meat kha

    • @adm2399
      @adm2399 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm a Muslim; let people live the way they want

  • @raviprabhu4130
    @raviprabhu4130 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Same sex means two brothers, or two sisters can marry legally ? Two father in-laws and to mother in-laws ? Other Religion also included or not , why only Hindus ?. Then we need to remove Bride and Spouse words from Indian constitution .
    If courts decide social cultural status of the Country, then why parliament is required as representation of the people ?

    • @sarthakc5224
      @sarthakc5224 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ravi ji they are legalizing same sex marriage... they are not legalizing incest sex.... Incest sex (between Men and Women ) results to genetic defects in new born.... Incest sex (between men and men) would not lead to genetic defects in new born....

    • @sandyketchum5386
      @sandyketchum5386 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You're hilarious. Right now marriage is legal between a man and a woman, does that mean you can go marry your sister or your mother? Why is it so difficult to understand this concept? We just want marriage to be legal between two adults just like how heterosexuals have been enjoying this right for a very long time. It's not promoting any such deplorable acts as you are suggesting.

  • @jarp5581
    @jarp5581 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love is love ❌
    Lust is Lust ☑️😂😂😂

  • @IMADHAV7
    @IMADHAV7 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    What a debate it was in the live chat
    I'll never promote this shit !

    • @thakuradishi8924
      @thakuradishi8924 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Tujhse kisi ne pucha yrr agr tum kisi chiz ke liye support nhi kr skte to km se km uske opposite bhi mt hua kro yrr khud problem h tumko yrr ye legal nhi krenge to tujhe kya lgta h ki vo toot jayenge are mrte dm tk jis chiz ke sath peda hue h uski ke sath marenge bhai tujhe hate nhi felana chahiye

    • @windsofdestruction
      @windsofdestruction ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Yes india is a beautiful country . some rainbow kids can pollute it

    • @redking4142
      @redking4142 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@thakuradishi8924 bhai do you even understand what this community is ? Ye jahiliyat khatam kar degi india ko do you need proof see the state of cannada nd America.

    • @avisangray
      @avisangray ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@redking4142 state of America? Economy is all time high, poverty is all time low, stop watching fake south asia propoganda.

    • @vikramaditya6812
      @vikramaditya6812 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ​@@redking4142 🎉You truly think India is more civilized than Canada?lmao

  • @prasadishan6887
    @prasadishan6887 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Now next they will ask for permission to marry with pet animals, and I wouldn't not suprise if SC allowes that. The argument would be, "my pet can't live without me".

    • @basantitanga3631
      @basantitanga3631 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      A lady already married herself and couldn't stand it for 1 day and filled for devorce the next day. 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

    • @teamgogreen5504
      @teamgogreen5504 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Don't be ridiculous. How come ur comparing relationship two individuals with that of someone and their pet.

    • @prasadishan6887
      @prasadishan6887 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@teamgogreen5504 yes, few years before nobody thought of this same sex relationship and now some are projecting it as pious task, so in future, next step would be relationship with pet.

    • @iloveyself267
      @iloveyself267 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      ​@@prasadishan6887 The argument that same-sex relationships are a new thing and that they're being presented as some sort of "holy" task is just plain wrong. People have been in same-sex relationships for centuries, and it's not a recent development.
      Moreover, it's the respect these people are demanding. All they are saying is that let them live too without being stigmatized every now and then.

    • @prasadishan6887
      @prasadishan6887 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@iloveyself267 yes right, but century ago they never came forward and asked to glorify their act. Further, the government has already decreminalized the applicable section, now this step next they will ask for separate reservation for their adopted child and so on. Let's see, some acts and relations look fine only in a dedicated place

  • @XIN_920
    @XIN_920 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Population increase is more concern than this topic, this topics are concern in usa like first world countries l, we need to focus first on our development and basic needs among huge population

    • @vishrutisingh
      @vishrutisingh ปีที่แล้ว

      They're talking about basic needs of individuals here as well. You shouldn't need to become a 'first world country' to have the right to marry someone you want to marry.

    • @trueword4971
      @trueword4971 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@vishrutisingh according to supreme court there is a no proper definition of male and female.
      So, how domestic violence law will apply.

    • @humanbeing2722
      @humanbeing2722 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@trueword4971 One human abusing another

    • @trueword4971
      @trueword4971 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@humanbeing2722 then who get divorce alimony

  • @thomassamuel9388
    @thomassamuel9388 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tomorrow a woman may say she want a bull or donkey or horse to service her so she want to marry those creatures and it was practiced in our culture as depicted in Kajuraho and konark and elsewhere so i think in future the court will say yes , the dirty Britishers stopped these wonderful practices lets resume it.

    • @Tsewang_Lachenpa
      @Tsewang_Lachenpa ปีที่แล้ว

      You can't make desicision of others, my friend had married with his boyfriend and live peacefully here in India.

  • @krishster6525
    @krishster6525 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Court must respect the Sociolegal structure of society and repercussions will be awful if such a verdict is issued by hon'ble court

  • @aseansurvey6213
    @aseansurvey6213 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thats so utterly freaking dirty...

  • @apuravpatelofficial
    @apuravpatelofficial ปีที่แล้ว

    And this is how we've got one more day delay. Woww 🫠