@@TheJurassicSquadYTWhile I do think Xbox players should be able to play Spiderman I understand that Sony at the end of the day still owns Spiderman. But Microsoft doesn’t own Indiana Jones…
I hate console exclusives, but saying this is a huge franchise and shouldn't be exclusive is no different than the upcoming wolverine and dont get me started on spiderman
@@skylarworkman7488 well then they wouldn't sell so much consoles. Have you ever wondered why consoles are priced as low as they are?... they are because they make money on the game sells for thier systems.
@wilk2809privat I understand all of that it just gets annoying when playstation players complain they don't get indiana jones and xbox players complain they don't get spiderman. I'm fortunate enough to be able to play xbox with my friends but have a pc for other things. Here's to waiting for Spider-Man 2 on pc in 2025 lol
@@skylarworkman7488 PlayStation said they won't bring sequels to PC. To try and convince people to buy their console. SM2 on PC won't happen. Trust me. Id love it.
They never got upset Xbox own halo series, because they built it in house, instead of buying another company so that it could release the game exclusively.
@@sungleong isnt spiderman marvel property ? doesnt marvel have sole writes to make spider man comics ? also bethesda made this game on their own with microsoft reasurces . just like how sony made their games also sony made ff 14 a ps exclusive via backhanded deals . so it doesnt make sense why u are dick riding the ps when its a multi billion dollor corporation which has as much dirt on them as microsoft does ,
Let's be real...Spider-Man is infinitely bigger than Indiana Jones and yet we don't hear Playstation fans saying "Oh, Sony should totally make Spider-Man a non-exclusive!" Playstation has their exclusives, and so does XBox. Learn to live with it.
Sony should make spiderman a non-exclusive - A sony fan Haven't seen a fan saying it should be, have seen some weird console exclusive defense for indy tho
They need to work on the names for modern Indiana Jones entries. Like we went from "Raiders of the Lost Ark", "Temple of Doom", "The Last Crusade", and "Kingdom of the Crystal Skull". To "Dial of Destiny" and "The Great Circle". "Dial of Destiny" is still passable (barely, only because "Temple of Doom" isn't much more inspired) but what's next? "Indiana Jones and the Important Thing"? "Indiana Jones and the McGuffin"? I get that the Great Circle is a concept in archeology, but like c'mon, be creative! "Raiders of the lost Ark" wasn't called "Indiana Jones and the shiny box that can telephone God".
Still waiting for an Indians jones set during ww2 again where he’s looking for yamashita’s gold shortly after the war, he fights imperial Japanese holdouts. And the title could be “Indiana jones, and the search for the stolen gold. It’s more inspired than dial of destiny’s story ngl.
Xbox needs this win. PS has Spiderman, a lot of Marvel projects coming, Uncharted, Last of Us, God of War. Been an Xbox fan since the OG and I'm so excited for this. I wish Sony would help end the exclusivity for any game and bring their properties to us Xbox guys
I don't think this is the major release that's gonna save Xbox, but if it's good it'll probably give a little boost in Xbox sales. I don't think Indiana Jones has nearly as much wide acclaim as something like Spiderman, and the other franchises you named are all Sony built series their own subsidiaries made.
Uncharted? Did they announce a new project for that series? That series was quite final with 4. I know there was Lost Legacy but you can only do so much with spinoffs.
Obviously, it's more the fact that this isn't being made by a Microsoft subsidiary, yet Microsoft is still forcing it to be exclusive to Xbox that I think is annoying. Machine Games is their own studio, not owned by either Sony or Microsoft.
@@koolaid33 i keep trying to reply but nothing seems to take. Anyway, Microsoft owns Zenimax which owns machinegames. This is the third time i've tried to type this, so sorry if they all show up.
So many things shouldn't exist. Like war and murder and depression. If you buy a closed system (consoles) you need to live with its closed systemness. Or buy a PC and get like 80%of both exclusives or emulate them a few years later.
It exists bc it allows console to have a position in the market. That’s like saying mods shouldn’t be a pc thing. There are many ways you could implement that on console but for some reason they’ve never even really tried except Bethesda’s lazy attempt. So as far as I’m concerned, until all the platforms all access the same features equally, then they can keep their exclusive gestures.
Agreed, though it's definitely a good move to get people to get their consoles. Just get a pc, you get the best gaming experience plus the xbox/playstation exclusives.
I agree. Sony should have stopped the locking stuff down as exclusives a long time ago. All games should be available on all platforms and then players can just choose the platform they like best to play games -or- Sony, Nintendo, and Microsoft should build a join system both at home and portable and have all games available on them.
@@stringbeans-e9m I haven't played many first person games but I'm actually really looking forward to this one. I think it will give it a bit more of that hard-hitting feeling of being Indiana Jones
I hope this game does well. Indy as a brand has had it rough for awhile and a particularly disastrous 5th film didn’t give the shot in the arm he needed. I think he could have a long healthy life in the world of gaming.
In 2023, a lot of movies failed to make a profit as a lot of movies all came out at the same time, which is never a good thing for the box office. The film did pretty well in terms of both verified audience reviews and most critics, but was a disaster in the box office department. So it was at least successful in 1 area, but I think we need this game for the franchise to fully come back. Indiana Jones really is kinda the perfect character for video games, so I am excited for the game.
How tf could it be Bismarck? Pretty sure in real life it sank to the bottom of the sea to the east of Britain. And when it comes to Indiana jones they tend to stick with real life events all being cannon. Unless some magical shit pulled it from the depths and put it atop the himilaya’s (somehow) I doubt it’s the Bismarck.
One small thing, this is set between Raiders and the Last Crusade, only after the Last Crusade tank chase, did he start to wear the bag outside of the jacket, but every shot in the trailer with the bag, it's over the jacket, I know it's very niggly, but it's one thing I don't get, how research would would lead you to not knowing this, still won't put me off playing though, that's my 2 cents ✌️❤️
PlayStation has so many exclusive games, it’s great that Xbox can have one every once in a while. I’d prefer that they just not do exclusives and let everyone play the games on whatever console they have.
Playstation players already having great exclusives such as Spiderman, I don't see anything wrong with Indiana Jones being an Xbox exclusive. After games like Starfield and Redfall, Xbox needs good exclusive more than ever.
Don’t lump PC gamers in with Microsoft fanboys, do you think we like having to use Windows? Also Ford is a hard impression to nail, the fact he was able to get so close is insanely impressive.
Bethesda is in bed with BlackRock. The pattern of studios releasing games with this investment company backing them has been abysmal. Fun, intelligent writing and design has been replaced with political ideology that nobody wants in their games, especially when sociology students are writing them. They'll probably make Indie a weak coward like they did in the new movie, play in his fear of snakes.
Capturing the spirit of the character is what's important. No modern politics or ideology, just an old-school adventure - and perhaps a way to start to forget that last movie.
As a history nerd I hope we get to see historically accurate symbols like swastikas. I know people can find it offensive but this is Indiana jones after all. Who doesn’t like beating up Nazis wearing swastikas anyway?
There’s no way to say this without it sounding weird to someone on the internet… but Indiana Jones is never (and should never be) just defined as: “the guy that kills/punches nahzees” (I intentionally spelled it wrong because you can’t trust TH-cam’s censor algorithm). Looking at Indiana Jones in that one singular light limits the character, as he’s fought dozens of other factions in his time… rival archeologists, traitorous tour guides, Arabic mercenaries, Chinese mobsters, cultists that live in an underground cave, a brotherhood of protective descendants, Nazca Warriors, a Russian military, and many others that I might have missed. I’m not saying he shouldn’t face the blond Germans, but assigning him the description of “an archeologist who punched fascist Germans” really hollows out his potential, and takes away from his archeology… making him a generic hero who only works to prevent the Germans from winning the Second World War. It takes away the fact that he’s just an archeologist who protects and attempts preserving precious artifacts from those who plan to either sell them, or use the artifacts for their own personal gain. Yes the plot of him preventing the Germans from exploiting it works extremely well… but I wish they’d explore other adversaries as well, since it would open up more room for interesting villains/rivals for Indy to face (rather than the same old world domination nahzees).
spiderman is a pretty big series that is locked to just Playstation and pc. Each console has exclusives, everyone's main judgement of Xbox was lack of exclusives so now they got some they're being judged for it?
I was hoping for more emperors tomb, that was a great Indy Game. But first person will be interesting. Seems kinda like Brothers in Arms where you duck in and out of POV, just a mechanic of the game to get used to.
im a playstation guy, but let them have their exclusives. we have the last of us, ghost of tsushima, god of war, uncharted, spiderman, and so much more
Spider-Man is the most popular superhero in the world by a considerable margin and his games are only PlayStation, so this being Xbox exclusive is more than fair.
i have a playstation not an xbox but i really really want to play it love indiana jones but also im not complaining i love my playstation exclusives xbox deserves to have amazing exclusives as well happy for the players sad i cant personally play
Man there are so many PlayStations exclusives, Xbox recently has been sharing games with PlayStation and received nothing by Sony, it’s only fair we get something.
Same thing that happened with Avatar Frontiers of Pandora is going to happen with this game, cinematics look great, graphics insane, but this is one of those games that need to be played 3rd person to really enjoy the scenery, puzzles, character interactions and all, in this type of games the character needs to interact with the environment for this to be fully enjoyed, same thing that happened with Avatar, not seeing your character interacting with the environment sort of killed the essence of the world they built since what you want to see is a big blue avatar all the time interacting with everything, not just the hands, that's why people think it was just another Far Cry game. Take this Indiana Jones game as sort of an "Uncharted similar experience", those that have played Uncharted know that it won't be the same played 1st person since you want to see Nate jumping around all the time, resolving puzzles, using the rope (that's why the camera changed to 3rd person in this game when using his whip, they want us to see Jones jumping around, why not just make it permanent?) . Game looks great, I just think it would be more enjoyable if you can see Jones all the time, not just his hands and shoes.
3rd person is nice because we can see what he will look like in action like it's a movie but you're controlling him. The only time 1st pov is good is for the guns/driving/flying or if someone is into it more then 3rd or both like me.
Serves Sony right, Microsoft gave PlayStation almost all their current exclusives like Sea of Thieves. Xbox received no exclusives in return from Sony.
How are you getting angry at Sony? They didn't ask, cared, nor wanted any Xbox exclusives, the only reason Microsoft made that decision is because they are in major financial troubles right now (probably because of the 70 odd BILLION dollars they spent on Activision last year). Microsoft made the decision by themselves, this was no agreement, Microsoft wasn't owed Sony exclusives. The Xbox brand isn't selling, so to try and prolong it's death, their just spreading out their IPs to make as much money from them as possible. Judging by Microsoft's reports, by 2028 I don't think they'll even be in the console market anymore, unless they are granted a miracle and suddenly the Xbox Series consoles start flying off shelves.
I am so fucking hyped for the Villain since he is played by Mario’s Gavrilis, a German VA who does so many great Voices (for example Katakuri in One Piece or Denver in La Casa de Papel) and he is so freaking great, can’t wait to see what happens
So this being a Xbox exclusive to you means that it's controversial?! 😂 Are you serious dude?! GTFO my boy, said by ps fanboy is truly embarrassing to say the least.
im glad its on PC too as this looks awesome and i loved the recent Wolfentien games, not sure who complained about long cutscenes have they never played a Final Fantasy game or some like the last of us? a solid story game also needs some good cutscenes
It's only a "controversy" if you're a Sony PlayStation fanboy. How is Indiana Jones being console exclusive to Xbox any different from Spider-man being console exclusive to PlayStation? It's not. Just do what I do & own both consoles (or play it on Steam/PÇ ) & stop complaining. If not, then perhaps make an argument for triple-A game exchanges. MicroSoft & Sony could make an agreement where each can port & swap their first-party triple-A exclusive after a 2 year exclusivity window, or something. Ex. Spider-man on Xbox for Indiana Jones on PS5. That way, everyone wins.
Ill stick with the "Wolverine" and "Spider-Man 1 & 2" games... Nothing can make be buy a POS like xbox. (Apparently alot off ppl agree bcs ps5 has sold twice as much...😂) Isolate the bigger gamer base... make less money... Good Job Xbox, that wont backfire! 👍🏻😂😂😂
If the Indy performance turns out to be really good, which so far it seems like it. We could have more future Indiana Jones stories thru the video game format
What do you think about this being Microsoft exclusive? 😤
As a PSN person, I’m upset. But looking at Xbox and what PS has done to them in the past, I’m a little less upset.
How could you have written this 12 hours ago?
I don't care really. If Playstation keeps Spider-Man to themselves, then us Xbox players keep Indiana Jones. That's the way I see it.
It won't be
@@TheJurassicSquadYTWhile I do think Xbox players should be able to play Spiderman I understand that Sony at the end of the day still owns Spiderman. But Microsoft doesn’t own Indiana Jones…
Replace “Indiana Jones” with “Spider-Man” and replace “Xbox exclusive” with “PlayStation exclusive” and all of a sudden it all makes sense
My thoughts exactly. Pretty much a direct comparison, not sure why he was complaining.
Came here to say the same 🤣
Yeah. Do you know how many games in the past two decades I’ve not been able to play because they’ve been PS exclusives?
Two wrongs don’t make a right
@@whattheheckificationthan he shouldve pointed that out like this comment did lol
"This game is being made by Machine Games"
Ah that explains the funny German guy😂
I hate console exclusives, but saying this is a huge franchise and shouldn't be exclusive is no different than the upcoming wolverine and dont get me started on spiderman
Exclusives are dumb all together but both companies need to let up
@@skylarworkman7488 well then they wouldn't sell so much consoles. Have you ever wondered why consoles are priced as low as they are?... they are because they make money on the game sells for thier systems.
@wilk2809privat I understand all of that it just gets annoying when playstation players complain they don't get indiana jones and xbox players complain they don't get spiderman. I'm fortunate enough to be able to play xbox with my friends but have a pc for other things. Here's to waiting for Spider-Man 2 on pc in 2025 lol
@@skylarworkman7488 PlayStation said they won't bring sequels to PC. To try and convince people to buy their console. SM2 on PC won't happen. Trust me. Id love it.
@Mynostrum But they brought Miles Morales and that is a sequel it might not say 2 but it is a second game to the first
I have always loved the Indiana Jones franchise since I was a little kid.
Same here
I love how PlayStation players get upset when xbox gets an exclusives, but when they get one, they dont seem to care
Oh, no, I’m pissed that the upcoming Wolverine game is a PlayStation exclusive
They never got upset Xbox own halo series, because they built it in house, instead of buying another company so that it could release the game exclusively.
Xbox doesn't have exclusives it has stuff which you rather play on PC
@@sungleong isnt spiderman marvel property ? doesnt marvel have sole writes to make spider man comics ?
also bethesda made this game on their own with microsoft reasurces . just like how sony made their games also sony made ff 14 a ps exclusive via backhanded deals . so it doesnt make sense why u are dick riding the ps when its a multi billion dollor corporation which has as much dirt on them as microsoft does ,
@@JuniperofTheWolvesthat game Will be made with sweet baby Inc i am so jealous
Considering its an exclusive, this is pretty much gonna be one of the first major games i pick up once i build my PC
Hell yeah! Hoping you get your PC by then
Same
Let's be real...Spider-Man is infinitely bigger than Indiana Jones and yet we don't hear Playstation fans saying "Oh, Sony should totally make Spider-Man a non-exclusive!"
Playstation has their exclusives, and so does XBox. Learn to live with it.
Sony should make spiderman a non-exclusive - A sony fan
Haven't seen a fan saying it should be, have seen some weird console exclusive defense for indy tho
They need to work on the names for modern Indiana Jones entries.
Like we went from "Raiders of the Lost Ark", "Temple of Doom", "The Last Crusade", and "Kingdom of the Crystal Skull". To "Dial of Destiny" and "The Great Circle".
"Dial of Destiny" is still passable (barely, only because "Temple of Doom" isn't much more inspired) but what's next?
"Indiana Jones and the Important Thing"?
"Indiana Jones and the McGuffin"?
I get that the Great Circle is a concept in archeology, but like c'mon, be creative!
"Raiders of the lost Ark" wasn't called "Indiana Jones and the shiny box that can telephone God".
Indiana Jones and the obscure place or object
Still waiting for an Indians jones set during ww2 again where he’s looking for yamashita’s gold shortly after the war, he fights imperial Japanese holdouts. And the title could be
“Indiana jones, and the search for the stolen gold.
It’s more inspired than dial of destiny’s story ngl.
Xbox needs this win. PS has Spiderman, a lot of Marvel projects coming, Uncharted, Last of Us, God of War. Been an Xbox fan since the OG and I'm so excited for this. I wish Sony would help end the exclusivity for any game and bring their properties to us Xbox guys
I don't think this is the major release that's gonna save Xbox, but if it's good it'll probably give a little boost in Xbox sales. I don't think Indiana Jones has nearly as much wide acclaim as something like Spiderman, and the other franchises you named are all Sony built series their own subsidiaries made.
Uncharted? Did they announce a new project for that series? That series was quite final with 4. I know there was Lost Legacy but you can only do so much with spinoffs.
@@ContrastCopy no I was talking about how Uncharted is one of many titles that are exclusive to PS only
Fanbois are the worst.
@@neo942007 👍🏻
Troy Baker plays everyone
I don't think it's terrible for Xbox to have some exclusives. I don't even have one.
Obviously, it's more the fact that this isn't being made by a Microsoft subsidiary, yet Microsoft is still forcing it to be exclusive to Xbox that I think is annoying. Machine Games is their own studio, not owned by either Sony or Microsoft.
@@koolaid33 check the Wikipedia. Microsoft owns zenimax... which owns machinegames.
@@koolaid33 Microsoft owns zenimax, which owns machinegames… look it up.
@@koolaid33 i keep trying to reply but nothing seems to take. Anyway, Microsoft owns Zenimax which owns machinegames. This is the third time i've tried to type this, so sorry if they all show up.
@@XanthosAcanthusI’m not the other guy, but just letting you know it’s all good mate, only the one showed up 👍
Exclusives should not exist and you can't change my mind.
So many things shouldn't exist. Like war and murder and depression.
If you buy a closed system (consoles) you need to live with its closed systemness. Or buy a PC and get like 80%of both exclusives or emulate them a few years later.
It exists bc it allows console to have a position in the market. That’s like saying mods shouldn’t be a pc thing. There are many ways you could implement that on console but for some reason they’ve never even really tried except Bethesda’s lazy attempt. So as far as I’m concerned, until all the platforms all access the same features equally, then they can keep their exclusive gestures.
Yeah they should have ended long long ago. Sigh.
Agreed, though it's definitely a good move to get people to get their consoles.
Just get a pc, you get the best gaming experience plus the xbox/playstation exclusives.
I agree. Sony should have stopped the locking stuff down as exclusives a long time ago. All games should be available on all platforms and then players can just choose the platform they like best to play games -or- Sony, Nintendo, and Microsoft should build a join system both at home and portable and have all games available on them.
Just wish this game was third person instead, like Staff of Kings
And the Lego games
im glad its first person i really like first person games
@@stringbeans-e9m I haven't played many first person games but I'm actually really looking forward to this one. I think it will give it a bit more of that hard-hitting feeling of being Indiana Jones
@@joshuagorski9452no matter how bad a movie is the Lego version will always be fun I’m talking about the sequel trilogy for starwars
@@stringbeans-e9m First person games are great! But I wanna be able to see Indiana Jones do the things in game, not just in cutscenes y’know
why is spider-man allowed to be playstation exclusive but indiana jones isn’t? I think it’s fine and may help sell consoles.
bout time you guys got denied an exclusive. time to get down off your high horse for a change.
These devs are really good at optimization as well
PlayStation has their exclusives so let Xbox have theirs
PlayStation should finally quit having exclusives so everyone can have fun.
@@adventure_gamer8179exactly.
Sony doesn't go out and buy companies just to make them exclusive
@@adventure_gamer8179Microsoft should let halo be on Playstation then
@@adventure_gamer8179Nintendo: 💀
I hope this game does well. Indy as a brand has had it rough for awhile and a particularly disastrous 5th film didn’t give the shot in the arm he needed. I think he could have a long healthy life in the world of gaming.
In 2023, a lot of movies failed to make a profit as a lot of movies all came out at the same time, which is never a good thing for the box office. The film did pretty well in terms of both verified audience reviews and most critics, but was a disaster in the box office department. So it was at least successful in 1 area, but I think we need this game for the franchise to fully come back. Indiana Jones really is kinda the perfect character for video games, so I am excited for the game.
It’s coming to ps5 in spring 2025
Indiana Jones is my childhood, I really hope they make success with this game
Did anyone notice that the ship that Bombastic talked about in the mountains of the Himalayas is actually the battleship Bismarck from WW2
How tf could it be Bismarck?
Pretty sure in real life it sank to the bottom of the sea to the east of Britain.
And when it comes to Indiana jones they tend to stick with real life events all being cannon.
Unless some magical shit pulled it from the depths and put it atop the himilaya’s (somehow) I doubt it’s the Bismarck.
I came here after the news that it's coming to PS5 at Spring 2025.
As a linux gamer... i am offended that you called pc gamers "Microsoft fanboys"... some of us just worship lord Gabe.
I grew up on Indiana Jones I haven’t been this excited about a video game in a long time
It honestly looks really good, I’m pretty excited for this
update on the Xbox exclusivity of the game! the game has been announced to be realeasing spring 2025 for play station.
how do you think spider-man fans felt for like 5 years before they ported those games to PC? you'll live dude.
Just buy a PS4 lol
@@MaiaGothmog i have one lol
@AtiShard16 Yeah, we ain't all made outta money
@@meliponalord8892 PS4 is really cheap now. You can save up for it
Question of the week: How is the Bombastic crew, and if you've seen them lately...
Has Orion been to Yavin IV?
Also how is Ben's bird Maddy?
1:18 eh, you know… kinda like Spider-Man 😂
2:08 looks like shrek 1 villian
To each on their own, i guess.
Choo choo
that ship in the mountain is the borealis
Boy, this video aged poorly in the BEST WAY POSSIBLE
One small thing, this is set between Raiders and the Last Crusade, only after the Last Crusade tank chase, did he start to wear the bag outside of the jacket, but every shot in the trailer with the bag, it's over the jacket, I know it's very niggly, but it's one thing I don't get, how research would would lead you to not knowing this, still won't put me off playing though, that's my 2 cents ✌️❤️
I feel like Indianna Jones should be a third person game.
I feel you. But it’s just Machine Games’s expertise.
I feel that, but it does give an interesting take on a game like this
A lot of Indiana Jones games were mostly 3rd person, side scroller or a point and click adventure, the 1st person is a new take and I do enjoy
PlayStation has so many exclusive games, it’s great that Xbox can have one every once in a while.
I’d prefer that they just not do exclusives and let everyone play the games on whatever console they have.
Playstation players already having great exclusives such as Spiderman, I don't see anything wrong with Indiana Jones being an Xbox exclusive. After games like Starfield and Redfall, Xbox needs good exclusive more than ever.
IF you play a game, you know who Troy Baker is! He is in almost every single video game!
Im a xbox player and it would be nice to play spider man so hows having this exclusive any different?
Don’t lump PC gamers in with Microsoft fanboys, do you think we like having to use Windows?
Also Ford is a hard impression to nail, the fact he was able to get so close is insanely impressive.
Spider-Man is also such a large international licensed property and it’s also huge.
And PS exclusive. PlayStation started this sh**
Indiana jones is such a big property… Sony is gatekeeping freaking Spider-Man.
But is sweet baby involved
Bout time we have something, Sony has spiderman and all that which I'll never get to play😢
Just buy a ps5
@@strangeTimingsbro you know how much a PS5 Is? Not everyone has that type of money you spoil brat
Bethesda is in bed with BlackRock. The pattern of studios releasing games with this investment company backing them has been abysmal. Fun, intelligent writing and design has been replaced with political ideology that nobody wants in their games, especially when sociology students are writing them.
They'll probably make Indie a weak coward like they did in the new movie, play in his fear of snakes.
Womp Womp PS fanboys. You don’t get to boast about Spider-Man and complain about this.
Capturing the spirit of the character is what's important. No modern politics or ideology, just an old-school adventure - and perhaps a way to start to forget that last movie.
Finally, a game on Xbox....please don't screw it
Complaining about Xbox exclusives as a PlayStation player is insane
When a story driven campaign has long cutscenes: 😟
If only there was a PlayStation franchise blatantly inspired by Indiana Jones
Spider-Man also has a huge fan base but Sony won’t give that up
"The Tomb Raider games are well recieved" yeah, right?
Spider-Man is also a huge international licensed property but us xbox players AND pc players dont get Spider-Man 2 do we.
As a history nerd I hope we get to see historically accurate symbols like swastikas. I know people can find it offensive but this is Indiana jones after all. Who doesn’t like beating up Nazis wearing swastikas anyway?
Sweet Baby Inc. There's your answer.
It's why a LOT of people are going to avoid this title like warm puke.
👍!
The voice is amazing! It's obviously not Harrison but it is really believable as Indiana Jones
I heard Sweet Baby Inc. is consulting for this game, so no.
great vid
also i agree
All you need is a pc and a PlayStation. Buying an Xbox is redundant and irrelevant
How do you think we felt when PlayStation restricted SPIDER MAN, sucks when it happens to you, huh
it looks like there are also soviet and Japanese enemies included in the game aswell
There aren't any soviets, this game is in 1937, they started a decade later
@@yourtypicalcupoftea the Soviet union was in ww2 tho. also it shows a destroyed city in Japanese territory and Germans in africa
@@tomasgibbs3235 oh, my bad, just searched it
@@yourtypicalcupoftea all good
Yall have Spider-Man and Wolverine we can have Indiana jones
i really wanna play it but i don't want to buy a brand new xbox for this game.....
I mean... it's not like a character with such an impact like Spider-Man is locked as a PS exclusive, right???
2:27 I'm sorry but is that man's first name "Jerk"? Is that an actual Swedish name?
You forgot putting scenes from Raiders of the Lost Ark, Atari 2600, the first one😆
There’s no way to say this without it sounding weird to someone on the internet… but Indiana Jones is never (and should never be) just defined as: “the guy that kills/punches nahzees” (I intentionally spelled it wrong because you can’t trust TH-cam’s censor algorithm).
Looking at Indiana Jones in that one singular light limits the character, as he’s fought dozens of other factions in his time… rival archeologists, traitorous tour guides, Arabic mercenaries, Chinese mobsters, cultists that live in an underground cave, a brotherhood of protective descendants, Nazca Warriors, a Russian military, and many others that I might have missed.
I’m not saying he shouldn’t face the blond Germans, but assigning him the description of “an archeologist who punched fascist Germans” really hollows out his potential, and takes away from his archeology… making him a generic hero who only works to prevent the Germans from winning the Second World War. It takes away the fact that he’s just an archeologist who protects and attempts preserving precious artifacts from those who plan to either sell them, or use the artifacts for their own personal gain. Yes the plot of him preventing the Germans from exploiting it works extremely well… but I wish they’d explore other adversaries as well, since it would open up more room for interesting villains/rivals for Indy to face (rather than the same old world domination nahzees).
Tbh, i thought exclusives are a thing of the past now, but since i don't have an xbox, looks like I'll be seeing the gameplay on youtube
spiderman is a pretty big series that is locked to just Playstation and pc. Each console has exclusives, everyone's main judgement of Xbox was lack of exclusives so now they got some they're being judged for it?
I was hoping for more emperors tomb, that was a great Indy Game. But first person will be interesting. Seems kinda like Brothers in Arms where you duck in and out of POV, just a mechanic of the game to get used to.
PS5 Gamers: Xbox has no games
Also PS5 Gamers: It's not fair that [insert game] isn't on PS5
im a playstation guy, but let them have their exclusives. we have the last of us, ghost of tsushima, god of war, uncharted, spiderman, and so much more
Spider-Man is the most popular superhero in the world by a considerable margin and his games are only PlayStation, so this being Xbox exclusive is more than fair.
i have a playstation not an xbox but i really really want to play it love indiana jones but also im not complaining i love my playstation exclusives xbox deserves to have amazing exclusives as well happy for the players sad i cant personally play
Good news for you today albeit in 2025.
Bombastic! Make a video all about darth vader/anakin in lego star wars the skywalker Saga!!! 😃
Man there are so many PlayStations exclusives, Xbox recently has been sharing games with PlayStation and received nothing by Sony, it’s only fair we get something.
Same thing that happened with Avatar Frontiers of Pandora is going to happen with this game, cinematics look great, graphics insane, but this is one of those games that need to be played 3rd person to really enjoy the scenery, puzzles, character interactions and all, in this type of games the character needs to interact with the environment for this to be fully enjoyed, same thing that happened with Avatar, not seeing your character interacting with the environment sort of killed the essence of the world they built since what you want to see is a big blue avatar all the time interacting with everything, not just the hands, that's why people think it was just another Far Cry game. Take this Indiana Jones game as sort of an "Uncharted similar experience", those that have played Uncharted know that it won't be the same played 1st person since you want to see Nate jumping around all the time, resolving puzzles, using the rope (that's why the camera changed to 3rd person in this game when using his whip, they want us to see Jones jumping around, why not just make it permanent?) . Game looks great, I just think it would be more enjoyable if you can see Jones all the time, not just his hands and shoes.
3rd person is nice because we can see what he will look like in action like it's a movie but you're controlling him.
The only time 1st pov is good is for the guns/driving/flying or if someone is into it more then 3rd or both like me.
Serves Sony right, Microsoft gave PlayStation almost all their current exclusives like Sea of Thieves. Xbox received no exclusives in return from Sony.
MLB The Show 22 and 23
But like Microsoft would get more money out of this expensive licensing. It's not even bad business, it's just stupid
How are you getting angry at Sony? They didn't ask, cared, nor wanted any Xbox exclusives, the only reason Microsoft made that decision is because they are in major financial troubles right now (probably because of the 70 odd BILLION dollars they spent on Activision last year). Microsoft made the decision by themselves, this was no agreement, Microsoft wasn't owed Sony exclusives. The Xbox brand isn't selling, so to try and prolong it's death, their just spreading out their IPs to make as much money from them as possible. Judging by Microsoft's reports, by 2028 I don't think they'll even be in the console market anymore, unless they are granted a miracle and suddenly the Xbox Series consoles start flying off shelves.
@@TheGingiGamerehhhhh could those really be counted?
@@ThatoneComrade-444 Yes since they're published by Sony Interactive
I am so fucking hyped for the Villain since he is played by Mario’s Gavrilis, a German VA who does so many great Voices (for example Katakuri in One Piece or Denver in La Casa de Papel) and he is so freaking great, can’t wait to see what happens
So many Microsoft fanboys in the comments 💀
This is coming to PS5 in spring of 2025
at this point in time you should at least have one of these combos. A pc with an xbox, a playstation with a pc, a xbox with a playstation.
I was gassed till I heard 1st person
They’re bringing it to PS5 now lol
I am excited for this, but not as much as I am for Outlaws.
Shrek
Eh
They could do what resident evil 8 did and add in a 3rd person, since there are already some parts where you play in 3rd person.
Ive been waiting for an Indiana Jones game for forever, hope its good 🤞🤞🤞🤞
calling PC users microsoft fanboys is wild.
Sweet baby Inc is developing it. Avoid it
Spiderman PS4 enough said
So this being a Xbox exclusive to you means that it's controversial?! 😂 Are you serious dude?! GTFO my boy, said by ps fanboy is truly embarrassing to say the least.
im glad its on PC too as this looks awesome and i loved the recent Wolfentien games, not sure who complained about long cutscenes have they never played a Final Fantasy game or some like the last of us? a solid story game also needs some good cutscenes
It's only a "controversy" if you're a Sony PlayStation fanboy. How is Indiana Jones being console exclusive to Xbox any different from Spider-man being console exclusive to PlayStation? It's not.
Just do what I do & own both consoles (or play it on Steam/PÇ ) & stop complaining. If not, then perhaps make an argument for triple-A game exchanges. MicroSoft & Sony could make an agreement where each can port & swap their first-party triple-A exclusive after a 2 year exclusivity window, or something. Ex. Spider-man on Xbox for Indiana Jones on PS5. That way, everyone wins.
FInally a Console Exclusive, this is what Microsoft needed. lets hope Todd Howard can actually make Somthing good this time.
Ill stick with the "Wolverine" and "Spider-Man 1 & 2" games...
Nothing can make be buy a POS like xbox. (Apparently alot off ppl agree bcs ps5 has sold twice as much...😂)
Isolate the bigger gamer base... make less money... Good Job Xbox, that wont backfire! 👍🏻😂😂😂
People literally want their console to have exclusives and the other consoles to give their exclusives to them💀
If the Indy performance turns out to be really good, which so far it seems like it. We could have more future Indiana Jones stories thru the video game format
The game is launching with Xbox and PC as an exclusive but still possible it ends up on ps5 at a later date