King Charles’ Artist Admits Not Everyone Will Like the New Portrait
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 พ.ค. 2024
- The King has unveiled the first completed official portrait of himself since the coronation.
The portrait, by British artist Jonathan Yeo, was commissioned in 2020 to celebrate the then Prince of Wales’s 50 years as a member of The Drapers’ Company in 2022.
Discussing the controversial bold colours used across the canvas, Yeo conceded that “there will always be people who disagree with you, people that don’t agree with how you’ve done it.”
Report by Matthew Covell.
#royalfamily #kingcharles #royalfamilynews
♛ Subscribe to our TH-cam channel (tap the bell icon and stay up to date with all the latest Royal videos!) - bit.ly/3jNBYZ7
♛ Find us on TikTok / royalfamilychannel
♛ Follow us on Facebook - / royalfamilychannel
♛ Tweet with us! - / royalfamilyitnp
Looks like it was made by a serial killer
I think it's the perfect portrait for King Tampax.
😂😂😂
😂😂😂
@@No_free_speech_in_YT_regime lolll
@@No_free_speech_in_YT_regime That's right! He wanted to be Camilla's tampon! Ew!
These Satanists not trying to hide at all anymore
If you mean the painter, that's hard to argue. Why else paint something like this?
If a child painted it, they would get sent to a psychologist.
It tells us what is to come. It makes me step back, feeling blatant evil in our face.
Be watchful. 😮
Maybe the artist is showing the world who king Charles is....maybe he's a cheeky feller 😏
@@Sotto_ Charles wants you to see who he is. He showed everybody in the opening ceremony of the commonwealth games but most people dont want to see it. This artist was obviously chosen because he uses masonic symbolism in his portraits of famous people. He wouldn't have been chosen without them knowing who he is and how he works.
@@holyglitch1126 Look at his portraits of other famous people. Charles knew.
The only thing in my mind when I saw it was blood. He’s covered in blood with a blood soaked wall behind him.
Have another cup of coffee and look up. Wow You are seriously out there. Jeez.
how very apt
He’s the foretold Antichrist of Biblical prophecy so yes, it’s probably very purposeful. Look up ”Antichrist and a Cup of Tea” by Tim Cohen. God bless
That red is not the color of blood. You are reaching to see what you can criticize.
Yep, blood of innocents.
Awful. Sorry
Hi 👋🏿 my Drag Queen sister
im pretty sure the artist intended it to be awful. its sickening.
There was literally no point in the way J. Yeo painted the King. I’m not British and I know King Charles wasn’t the best with Diana but the way he was portrayed here was just abysmal.
Why make the color red over the whole painting? Its one of the most terrible paintings ive ever seem. Especially one for a royal
Jews have a thing for "Red".
Jews
@@isolinear9836 nailed it!
@@RabbiPorkchopracists like you.
It's supposed to represent blood
It looks like he's portrayed as satan!
BINGO
S.a.t.a.n.s little helper
Antichrist
That for sure.
So much BS excuses for painting a horrible painting.
Don't like the truth when you see it then?
It gives me dystopian vibes.
He is a tampon
It gives me Gothic Horror Film vibes. I keep waiting for Vincent Price to walk by.
and you think the artist was unaware of this lol
The use of a Monarch butteryfly over the right shoulder seems a bit 5th grade-ish. The rest of it just looks like a head floating in a pool of blood. Gruesome at best.
😂👍
Apparently King Charles requested the monarch butterfly to be in the painting
Monarch butterflies are used and known for occult practices.
Butterfly is a clue that there is a butterfly image.
Yeah... look up the Monarch project. The butterfly is used in mind control experiments as a metaphor for transformation into a split personality.
If a child painted that, the parents would be concerned.
My Dog Saw it on The News & Was Scared of it, He Ran away then barked at it, He Never does That...! 😔
Dogs just know.
Widziałam dwa razy diabła, więc się nie dziwię
If an animal backs away from something you know it's evil.
😂
He is the AntiChrist. It explains who he really is. Yes, your dog is smart for not liking him.
I don’t care for this don’t like it
Its a great anti-monarch piece. Not sure how he got away with convincing anyone otherwise
Exactly. How on Earth did the get approved by the team of media advisors. Absolutly Satanic, no doubt.
For such a well painted face, the rest is like 'what?'
i love it, its memorable and will easily stand out in a room.
Satanic
@@maxinegreathead6386 The color red has many meanings. I see it as a power piece.
Even the face is showing you who he really is.
@@official2mt37 It certainly will. 😬
So you want to tell everyone why you put Baphamet, one- eyed symbol, demons, and monarch butterfly programming in this portrait?
Nostradamus predicted that prince chuck here would be the ruin to the royal 'empire'
Can someone explain the symbology of the butterfly please?
@@DianaEversolereally?
Butterfly in occult means demon possession and mind control @@CosmicSeeker69
@@CosmicSeeker69monarch programming
Well he sealed his fate of ever painting another portrait for anyone else lol
You got auto-corrected and you didn't leave the comment you meant to leave.
@@christinesbetterknitting4533 ohhhh what does it say because I see exactly what I wrote??? I think I may have been invaded here because of all the comments I leave on MM&H
You said he sealed his fate of ever painting another portrait for anyone else, and you are sooo RIGHT, !!!
Away with the secret cult monarchy
It’s horrible.
I don't not like it. It gives me the chills.
Mission accomplished, then.💀
It’s a mirror image. Look it up.
Demonic
Then do yourself a favor and never look at a Brekzenski painting haha
@@Arginnemirror and reflection
The excessive red ruins it! 🫤
the excessive blood. demonic portrait
Agreed.
Doesn't red stand for communism ?
He could have put different shades of red
@@A-Grammie-On-the-ROCK red stands for a 100 different things
Not everyone? Don't make me laugh, it's universally bad. How could they even approve this...
So explain why you did this atrocity!
Looks like a form of devil worship from a Hammer House of Horror! Wonder how much it cost?
£8 million.
No disrespect to King Charles, but. HE WAS ROBBED.! I suppose that means no OBE for me.
@trevorbrassey1651
🎖️ Awwwww 😤
@@trevorbrassey1651more like the taxpayers were robbed
Indeed! What mugs we are!
Terrible modern art as usual, so disappointing.
They paid for that???
No we paid. The British taxpayer.
We paid for that monstrosity
We most probably paid for it.🤮🤮🤮
Promotion for Carrie 2 ?? Face is great red is horrible, bloodbath springs to mind
That is your interpretation of red... Red also means and symbolises many other positive and beautiful things, such as abundance,
love, passion, character, energy, strength, security, warmth. Let's be more open minded, art give us that possibility ❣
Wrong color of red for blood.
@@christinesbetterknitting4533Not when it's art... it can symbolise thus it represents.
@anacatalinalopezlutz3143
King Charles III is none of those things.
@@StarTzarina That's your perception. I have a different perception of the King, my own is positive.
I've looked at other works by Mr. Yeo, and his other portraits seem much more balanced.
He has done beautiful portraits of Prince Philip and the former Duchess of Cornwall, Her Majesty Queen Camilla.
He also used this same style for other figures he has painted, including his own father, but those portraits use different tones and have better definition and contrast.
I think the red in this portrait is totally overwhelming and detracts from the subject.
It makes a statement, but generally not a positive one.
And although the red has a slightly pink tone to it, it still illicits too much of a connection to imagery of fire and blood. Those are not kind symbols to be associated with a King, especially King Charles.
It has prompted unjustified vile remarks against the King.
Surely the artist wasn't oblivious to how this would be received, which really makes you question his intent, no matter how he tries to justify it.
Well written. I said Fire!
Yes well said
Find out what he is involved in and you will change your mind. He wants to enslave you and change your way of life dramatically that’s if you survive he is a member of the world economic foreign wake up please.
Marxists Wipeout of the regal sovereign uniform.
😊
Why would you take artistic liberties, especially in this way, of the King or any Monarch for that matter? What is wrong with you? You paint the King properly or step aside and let a truly artistic artist take the role. He needs a Regal Royal Portrait. You can always paint how you do with your other work at a nother time. If your intentions weren't meant for the work you were tasked to do, then you shouldn't be painting at all.
Somebody say ____it get paint so on purpose
A blood soaked portrait is completely appropriate for Savile's best friend.
I agree 💯% Definitely not a Painter, accustomed to painting portraits 🙈
Portrayed him perfectly. All the right symbolism there for you to figure out who he really is.
Beautifully see it and absolutely correct
I like the face rendering, but not enough contrast or detail in the remainder 98% of the painting.
Satan himself 😮
Netanyahu first then him 👹
Most disturbing
The back ground should have been blue and yellow complimenting his red uniform. His face is marvelous.
His face is stunning.
Is that Dracula 🧛🏻♀️ painting 🖼️ 🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🧛🏻♀️👀❓
It's vigo the carpathian.
All the bloodshed of the Royal Family symbolised in one painting.
First time I saw this picture I thaught it was a joke.
I'm sorry, but for me it seems like the King is in bloud or fire.
What will people think about this picture in 100, 200, 500 years, maybe after a bloudy/fire-full war?
Charles was the Prince of Wales when the artist started to paint it. Red is the significant colour of Wales.
The first thing I thought when I read your comment was "Why did this commenter mis-spell "blood?"
You won't be here.
@@christinesbetterknitting4533it is called typo love
What people who know the history of the family think of his ancestors now.
Like his face floating within the fireplace smiling at you.
Jonathan Yeo, troll of the year 😂
Marxist of the month...
The King should have been painted wearing The Garter Robes or a miitary uniform.
Very poor representation of His Majesty. Red on red?
Seriously?? The "artist" needs to go back to school.
Why is it. That the worse the art, nowadays the artist cannot do without a lot of text to explain what the eye does not appreciate😊?
Художник это наивысшее проявление оптимизма!!! НаВерное Очень Грустно Жить в Мире, в котором Приходится Обьяснять Банальные Вещи Всем Подряд.)))
@@user-qz4rj2kr8lBanal is only one of the right words here😊
It looks like Satan - the red background ruins the portrait
and butterfly ( monarch programming)
It's an interesting portrait and the likeness is wonderful, but His Majesty King Charles III emerging from a wall of blood is difficult not to see when you look at it.
Its nothing like blood.
Blood of Dianna
King of what?
Horrible.
This reads, “The King doesn't just have blood on his hands, the Monarchy is steeped in Blood.”
It's amazing how many people who don't live there, know more about the truth of the Monarchy than those who do live there.
Yes. Where is kate?
Charles III: Revelling in his Satanism.
That the interpretation of an artist not the king that thinking knows better but even a student could have done better 😅😅😅
Art as beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I would have liked to see King Charles more clearly. My opinion.
He’s gone demonic long time already…
@@lucialindeboom1382petty mean comment
@@lucialindeboom1382
If that’s what you see then that’s what’s within you. It’s your eyes that seeing it, pieces of art are your interpretation.
@@marieross it is you who do not understand or aware of what goes behind closed doors of elites in what they are doing. It made me sad to say this truth out. Many paedophiles artists are commissioned to paint for the elites too and those you are not going to see it in TH-cam. You think it is mean, but it is actually simply factual but they are not showing you that.
@@lucialindeboom1382
Prove it 😜
Don't like anything that requires an explanation. And it's supposed to be a portrait not a life story, should have gone with the same guy who did William and Katherine
Revolting portrait
just remember one thing: "BE AFRAID OF YOUR DESIRES"...I hope you all understand what I am talking about....tampon, or not tampon...
He captured the face of the King remarkably well.
Not sure why the rest was chosen 🤔
"King"
If you have paid, get a refund... , delete this and sit before a proper artist representing you at this time of your life , in positiveness ..Not some one who wants to be artistic about you in the most bizzare ways ....,this is not the time such a morbid picture should be released especially when the royal family is struck by so much illness....
This is utterly repulsive and disgusting. His Majesty should burn it. Its utterly terrible. I wonder if it is some kind of joke. Ghastly.
There is no illness. They were arrested.
I agree with you there.
Make sure the next artist is not Marxist, Communist or Socialist. Just a normal artist appreciative of the money and acknowledgment.
Lazy work is what this is.
Placing 2 portraits side by side but in reverse reveals the baphomet image which isn’t surprising in the slightest
I mean no disrespect here but the painting is reminiscent of an Evil Dead movie poster. Sorry.
It shows his evilness. They dont even try to hide it.
Evil
Es demasiado intenso, recibo un mensaje negativo, respetando al artista y su obra. Me parece un retrato fuerte, me hace pensar que destaca malas decisiones del rey, sufrimiento, sumido en un infierno de sufrimientos. No consigo ver ese cuadro X segunda vez.
David Ike was right all along!
Draco....
Its hideous
It's absolutely horrendous and should never be seen again. Doesn't someone look at these things before they are unveiled?
Royal blood bath
Was a photograph airbrushed? The hidden picture looks very similar to a photograph of the king wearing his reds. In this monstrosity I see a painter with a very negative story he's trying to tell. I've had 6 year olds draw a better picture of a butterfly than this is. I feel sorry for His Majesty. What's he going to do with this horror?
This isn’t just a difference you can explain away. It’s not a portrait. I’m not sure what to call the great mess on the canvas.
I don’t think it was a compliment. It would be interesting to know how that artist was contracted. Yeo was delighted at watching King Charles squirm uncomfortably.
Hes burning... on fire... wierd .
Sack this 'artist'
I think he looks like he’s looking through wallpaper
Not good
I thought it was a joke...turns out the painting is actually real and horrendous....and Charles deserves it.
I actually like it. I'm Irish btw and not a British Royal Family aficionado, nor have any great interest in more impressionistic/'creative' art. I think this portrait is striking and the overall design is clever and very well executed.
Looks like the walk to Purgatory….
Hellfire.
🔥🔥🔥
So they saw this finished product, and said ‘sure, that works’? This is awful
People are certainly devided thats for sure.
I’ve yet to see a single positive remark. So NO, No one is “devided”.
@@LaDivinaLover I've seen loads of comments from people who like it........ You're wrong, look around.
......................................................
Unless that is the painting of his aura? It's a Hellish look to it was this intentional?
Years ago my Mother in law threw an annual Halloween party. They were fun. Every year she would have a different special event or game. One year she hired an "aura reader" He took like a Polaroid pic of each of us and on most you could see a faint delicate color around the person. Like a rainbow or pale blue etc. Mine had this massive red cloud around me. It looked like a fat bright blood red feather boa around me. My heart and stomach just dropped and I froze when I saw it. I didn't like or enjoy that at all. It really distressed me a lot.
@@lisascorp Red in the aura shows anger or being upset, its a ring around the body about 1cm not like this disgusting thing.
@tsmith9078 Well, I was spending the evening with my Mother in Law. Lol.
I don't think this aura reader was legit anyway. But it Freaked me out a bit, nobody else's picture turned out like mine. Mine looked like rage.
I love it! It looks epic, like an Arthurian legend coming out of the mists.
Beautiful, exactly what all countries under British empire were thinking
I love it! It looks epic, like an Arthurian legend coming out of the mists. Honestly, what do people want, every portrait to just be King Charles standing there in a suit or King Charles standing here in a uniform? He can have a photo taken for that. It's art people, lighten up. The face is perfect btw - and the rest keeps it interesting.
Mordred more like.
It just makes me think of bloodshed and war. Doesn't fit the King's persona at all.
Quite fitting actually!
Please review the color of blood. This is not it.
Not everyone?! You mean absolutely no one😂 it's awful. Looks like "the portrait of Dorian Grey" 😂 at the end of the book 😮
That's why I like it.
Mr. Yeo, your painting is marvelous. If you like it, no one else's opinion is important or right. Thank God we live where everyone can comment about how they feel when observing a work of art. Frankly, Picasso does nothing for me, but I recognize his artistic genius and liked his works done when he was very young.
Horrific! What was the point of this? What a waste of time and money.
BLOOD🩸 IN HIS HANDS.
(Rest in peace, Princess Diana💐)
That portrait is scary 😨
The excessive use of red depicts the pure colonization massacre
Take the L
True.
Don’t worry about criticism this is a wonderful work of art and credit to you for producing a modern & absolutely genuine work. Love it.
What do you love about it exactly?
Each to their own ,but not for me.
It's so bad I'm starting to think the artist is an antimonarchist
No the artist isn't "an antimonarchist". If you had listened to the artist, he said he started painting the portrait when Charles was the Prince of Wales (red is the most significant colour of Wales). He became Kind half way through him painting it.
@@SelinaBarton-ij5iz
Then why on earth continue with all of the red? He should have chosen a more regal background.
I notice the artist dressed himself in regal purple for the unveiling. That was by no mistake. 🙄
Some artists think far too highly of themselves and they try too hard to be controversial at any cost. It doesn't resonate well with people, especially for a formal portrait.
@@Sotto_
Only the artist can answer that question.
@@SelinaBarton-ij5iz
And so he should.
Captured the essence of the King in that fabulous face…and the monarch butterfly near his shoulder. ❤.
This is horrible 🤣 did they pay money for this?
Tax payers' money. Don't you worry.
His face is spectacularly done. The rest is starting to grow on me.
🩸🩸🩸🧛🏻♀️🩸🩸🩸
Actually I agree. I really did like his face It was definitely the King. The face is kind, generous , caring, honest. The red is certainly growing on me. 🇦🇺🦘🐨💐❤️
His face is embellished
@@hannas-e343
Embellished? It's a painting!
Sounds like the artist got in his own head. Different to be different. There are ways to have made it modern versus traditional portraits without trying so blatantly hard to be different. Then again, it does speak to the King for the fact that he has been desperate to show how he is different. Truth of the matter, its getting lots of views and comments which is a plus. However, once that settles and its just another portrait in 100 years its just going to be an eyesore.
BRILLIANT 👏 AND STUNNING!!!,
HOW JONATHAN YEO CAPTURED THE WAY KING CHARLES TREATED BELOVED DIANA ON PLANET EARTH...
It strikes me as an exponent of magic realism, another example to compare this with is Ivan Albright's portraits. Albright was a Chicago based artist who garnered considerable attention for imbuing mystic and layered elements with his classically painted human renderings. Perhaps the artist can be included in this group.
People may say genius but I see the red as prominent before the king.
I think it is a marvelous portrait! The artist caught that warm and wise expression of King Charles.
Those photographs you used are BEAUTIFUL. I wish they could be published !
Wow , What a Wonderful Gift for a Magnificent Man , God Save the King. Prayers to You and HRH Catherine. Have a Grand Day.
Lol
Oh, the irony........
Lol it has a mirror image of the baphomet in it
Complex and pleasing , would love to see it for real. It is serious but encourages you to smile and relax for a few minutes.Like a gorgeous moment in the sky or at sea.
3 f'n YEARS for this??!! Blood soaked KING??!! I think this artist needs to STOP thinking! EVERY sentence I think, I think,...
Did you THINK about how to describe this monstrosity to the children??!!
This is simply a disgrace!
What was he even thinking?
RED means and symbolises many positive and beautiful things such as: abundance, love, passion, elegance, character, energy, strength, security, warmth. Let's be open minded, art give us that possibility ❣
The Monarch Butterfly is genius!!! 🦋 ❤ 👑
Congratulations to the artist 👏👏👏
You forgot satan smh that’s the main one u missed
Youre incredibly wrong... Based on color theory, red symbolizes anger and power. Just look at all the axis propaganda for World War II. Have you ever seen the movie Inside Out? What color is anger? He looks like a Sith Lord soaked in blood...
Then let the red stay in his dress suite not all over the canvas no it’s horrible in my opinion. It’s not the time to exhibit one’s artistic talents for Your Majesty the King….
It is warm and intriguing.Yes.
@@MiaSharp-tf9bq it is horrible and very Henry