The CRAZIEST Marshall mod you've ever seen!!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ย. 2024
  • This 1971 100W Super Lead has the most crazy mod you will ever see...
    headfirst.amplification@gmail.com
    headfirstampli...
    / headfirst.amplification
    / 225949122469679
    / headfirstamps.jason
  • เพลง

ความคิดเห็น • 86

  • @jesseblue9528
    @jesseblue9528 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Only three things I can assume at first glance.
    1. God Tier tone
    2. Dumpster fire tone
    3. House fire.

  • @FaintSignals
    @FaintSignals 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This thing should have been donated to the Marshall museum for posterity to enjoy, respect, denigrate, smile, laugh, cry...

  • @vox1962
    @vox1962 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I’m thinking with a dummy load on the Marshall’s speaker out, it allowed the player to crank the Marshall to get power tube overdrive with the total overall volume controlled by the solid state power amp which then fed into the speaker cabinets. Eddie Van Halen did the same thing with his live rig in the 80s running his Marshalls, everything on 10, into H&H power amps, then into his cabs

    • @qua7771
      @qua7771 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But only one control knob? I guess it's possible.

  • @Touch2Much
    @Touch2Much 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    What’s the issue?
    An amp is a piece of equipment, a tool.
    This amp had circuitry added to be able to function optimally in a certain setting/for a certain use.
    I have seen tube amps with small mixer consoles added to the head shell and wired directly to the preamp, tube screamers permanently wired into the preamp of the amp or parametric EQ circuit board lifted from another device and hardwired between the preamp and power amp.

    • @OgamiItto70
      @OgamiItto70 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Cork-sniffing "vintage" purists call that kinda talk "sacrilege."

    • @goodun2974
      @goodun2974 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If the amp doesn't do what you want it to in its current form, you're better off selling it and buying something else that will do what you want; or buy an amp with an effects loop and patch in whatever effects you like.

    • @michaelknight4041
      @michaelknight4041 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@goodun2974or maybe build something yourself and implement these things into a custom design. At least find something besides an old Marshall to use as a Frankenstein

    • @Touch2Much
      @Touch2Much 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@goodun2974 and what if the function you are looking for is not available in the market or very expensive compared to modding it?

    • @Touch2Much
      @Touch2Much 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@michaelknight4041 what if you can't build it yourself or a custom amp is waaay to expensive?
      Why do hotrodders build their hot rodded car on a chassis of a run of the mill car, like amps are run of the mill products?
      Why do people send amps in to be modded? It's one of Headfirst's branches of income...

  • @RDamps
    @RDamps 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Spat my morning coffee out when you pulled that chassis 😂. That solid state power section looked similar to the one in the MOSFET Lead 100.

  • @dwightnicholson2647
    @dwightnicholson2647 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    They wanted a Roland Jazz Chorus Channel !

  • @kxmrock
    @kxmrock 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Well the best part is its going back to stock, hopefully with some of Jasons improvements

  • @jaykafcas4342
    @jaykafcas4342 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is the “Addition Mod”
    Anything you do, you add onto that.
    This one here takes
    ‘building the plane while you fly it’
    -to the next level.
    Thst actually takes herds of skill to keep adding. & adding & adding and the amp to still function.
    It’s as if he created his own situation that needed something added right after he added whatever he just implemented.
    LOL man!!
    Cheers for YEARS🤘🏻
    Cool video!

  • @Tacklebox455
    @Tacklebox455 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    I really want to know what the solid state part was for now

    • @jimbaxter8488
      @jimbaxter8488 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      A separate solid state clean channel?

    • @OgamiItto70
      @OgamiItto70 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jimbaxter8488 That's what I thought at first, too, but it seemed to be set up to come off of one of the original speaker outs, so maybe it was for splitting off some output signal for delay, reverb, stereo chorus, something like that? Or a jury-rigged "direct out," maybe?
      We're liable to find out, I reckon.

    • @jimbaxter8488
      @jimbaxter8488 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@OgamiItto70 with that giant output transformer you are begging for loud hum…it might have looked good on paper but in practice it’s a really bad impractical idea

    • @killingmasheen
      @killingmasheen 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's an auxiliary solidstate poweramp likely taken from a stereo rackmount unit judging by the box-like structure everything's mounted on. The transformers in these things were so massive that the circuitry had to be compacted onto these brackets to fit everything on as well as shielding it from the transformer to minimize noise.

  • @jayguitar
    @jayguitar 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That wiring inside is wild! 😮 brings back memories of the first amp I built - I wasn’t good at building an amp 25 years ago so the wiring inside was a mess I eventually started referring to the wiring as a ‘rats nest’! Lol! You’ve no doubt brought it back to its original glory and tone Jason. Look forward to seeing the videos as it progresses.

  • @gabrielstevens41
    @gabrielstevens41 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    On one hand what a nightmare, on the other it's kind of fun to see the kind of wild west solutions modders were coming up with solve problems players were coming up with back in the day. I wonder if that contraption ever worked the way it was supposed to?

  • @lordgraga
    @lordgraga 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That’s the most intense master volume mod I’ve ever seen.

  • @geezberry8889
    @geezberry8889 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    cocaine is a helluva drug

  • @goodun2974
    @goodun2974 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It looks like an explosion took place at a spaghetti factory! I see some lousy soldering here, so whoever modified this probably didn't really know what the hell they were doing.....

  • @anthonydevito1298
    @anthonydevito1298 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Jason is it sick of me to wish a little that we got to see it explode in flames when you powered it on? 😅

    • @HeadfirstAmps
      @HeadfirstAmps  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Not at all! I rolled the tape, kinda hoping for some fireworks!

    • @JagStar
      @JagStar 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@HeadfirstAmps I was watching for that too. Then you would have sworn your first TWO times on the channel, LOL!

  • @tobaccosun
    @tobaccosun 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My brain is blowing up because I can’t remember where I’ve seen that exact amp before! I’m gonna have to go back and look in my old messages or threads.

    • @qua7771
      @qua7771 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This looked familiar to me as well. Didn't another tech/ content provider turn it away a few years ago?

  • @rombidaut1917
    @rombidaut1917 หลายเดือนก่อน

    More is More

  • @canaan_perry
    @canaan_perry 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'm sure there was a practical reason for why that solid state section was implemented.

    • @Mark70609
      @Mark70609 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are people out there with crazy ideas. My only thought was to run a dry wet set up. Even so it’s still crazy way to implement it.

    • @qua7771
      @qua7771 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It looks crazy now that these amps are valued in their original condition. I think the work looks skillfully done for its era, and appears to have been done with intent, (not a DIY experiment).

  • @divebomb99
    @divebomb99 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    We’ve had Frankenstrats for decades, now we have a true Frankenmarshall. Oy.

  • @TheStephensjoshua
    @TheStephensjoshua 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cool restoration project

  • @curtisprice9806
    @curtisprice9806 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    LET US HEAR WHAT THIS AMP CAN DO! (Before you take it all apart to make it stock again) WOULD LOVE TO HEAR THE BUZZOLA FOR BETTER OR WORSE

    • @564df6g5h4d6f5g4h6d5
      @564df6g5h4d6f5g4h6d5 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Crazy to change that thing. Let it be😂😂😂

  • @barnyardstory
    @barnyardstory 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A good exercise would be to draw out that mod. Once you have a drawing of it, it will make sense enough to maybe leave it be, just fix it. It's a very tedious process but worth it to see if the mod is pure genius or pure sub-genius. If you plan on restoring it, as you mentioned? At least you can work off the new schematic. I once drew out a Jackson XLS-1000 schematic and man what I discovered.

  • @LeonTodd
    @LeonTodd 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is the amp equivalent of putting a Floyd and EMG's on a 50's Les Paul.

    • @HeadfirstAmps
      @HeadfirstAmps  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Haha, best analogy yet!

  • @terrydemol5354
    @terrydemol5354 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The power transformer is a large dual C-core, we used to make 'em. -> As you can see from the Fluke on HT when playing, very low sag compared to standard Marshall PT. C-core traffos have about the lowest voltage sag of any transformer for a given power rating. The gotcha is they can have mechanical noise due to the cores 'chattering' where the join is if not joined, tension banded and varnished properly. It should be a pretty loud amp with decent tubes.

    • @RedVulcan
      @RedVulcan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Interesting. I used to work for a magnetics manufacturer. I mostly did high frequency ferrite and powdered iron designs but also some 50 Hz transformers using E and I laminations. We never dealt with C-core types, though I was aware of them. Why does that core type offer less sag?

    • @terrydemol5354
      @terrydemol5354 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RedVulcan The core material is made from tightly wound, continuous strip GOSS (grain oriented silicon steel) / GOES (grain oriented electrical steel) There are various grades but they a/ have lower core losses for a given magnetization level and b/ can be run at a higher magnetization level (say 1.5 to 1.7 Tesla) than EI cores. This means fewer windings, so thicker wire for a given VA rating = lower winding resistance. Toroids a lighter and smaller for a given VA but will have more sag. You will often see them used for V H quality Hi Fi tube output transformers with much wider bandwidth than most guitar amp transformers. C-cores are also expensive.

    • @qua7771
      @qua7771 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My first impression was that the transformer looked beefy. Something I would want to keep for another build. Original E/I sag transformer sag would be desirable in a restoration. The C core would be great in a modern custom build.

  • @jamesfulton8310
    @jamesfulton8310 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Its not some sort of solid state ttenuation and re-amp like a primative Fryette power station?

  • @Burkhimself
    @Burkhimself 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Aw man…I wanted to hear what the knob & the footswitch jack did ! 😅

  • @SimonGotlieb
    @SimonGotlieb 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't think you've sworn before on TH-cam. I would be too if I faced that. At least you know where you need to end up. Good luck.

  • @NitroModelsAndComics
    @NitroModelsAndComics 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I suspect leaving that alone and making sure it functions would be my first response. It looks like a Wizard that knew what he was doing added Mad gain stages to it. Up to and including Diode clipping.
    I am only 2 mins in so... But I might want to leave it if it functions. But thats me. Ill keep watching.

  • @TheChipMcDonald
    @TheChipMcDonald 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Seems like something Tom Scholtz might do.

    • @Mark70609
      @Mark70609 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tom Scholtz has better sense than that.

    • @TheChipMcDonald
      @TheChipMcDonald 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@Mark70609Look at the video of the prototype for the powersoak. Also has a relay on an out. Scholz was running a remote slave set up for volume control at one time, pre-Rockman. The age of the work looks right for the era, and whoever did it was purposeful.

  • @revolverxxxx
    @revolverxxxx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is it possible to upgrade the dsl20 and put 6550s in it?

  • @soapboxearth2
    @soapboxearth2 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Holy shit. Lol

  • @208414
    @208414 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is there any resistive load in there? Perhaps it was supposed to be a way to reamp the loaded down signal for low volume playing. That’s my only idea of why someone would do that.

    • @HeadfirstAmps
      @HeadfirstAmps  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly what I was looking for and how I tried to test it. There wasn’t any resistive load in the amp, but maybe the guy used one externally?

    • @therealjamesmarchant
      @therealjamesmarchant 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I thought this too. The external load would probably need to be external for size and thermal issues, but then, why not just design an external load + re-amp box?

  • @adamr8878
    @adamr8878 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is it not a load + reamp which allows cranked tones whilst turned down ?

    • @HeadfirstAmps
      @HeadfirstAmps  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      With the addition of a load resistor or load box, then yes it could have been for sure.

  • @kirkgreenman1386
    @kirkgreenman1386 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Upload the amp pictures to amp archives

  • @JagStar
    @JagStar 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    WOW

  • @drloqutis2492
    @drloqutis2492 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    what did the mod sound like?

  • @marvelharris9540
    @marvelharris9540 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    someone went to a lot of trouble to destroy that poor amp!

    • @Mark70609
      @Mark70609 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It’s criminal. I don’t know on what universe that was a good idea.

  • @RicardoRodrigues-ds6mr
    @RicardoRodrigues-ds6mr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great Mod Jason, congratulations!

  • @killingmasheen
    @killingmasheen 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It looks like something an auto or hi-fi audio guy did. Everything's way oversized for the job because there's no real weight or size penalty in these applications. It's often the case the 'techs' installing this stuff over-do it because they lack the basic knowledge how to do things properly so they make everything as big as possible to ensure it doesn't fail.
    The top facing PCB appears to be the power supply going by the regulators on the board with the metal 'box' structure acting as a heatsink for the power transistors and mounting the rest of the circuit. I've seen this configuration before in older 4U-5U rackmount stereo poweramps (one 'box' per channel) so if I were to guess that's probably where it came from except with a smaller power transformer being it's only amplifying half of the signal. The size and weight of the EI transformers used in older class AB stereo rackmount poweramps amps are a sight to be seen. If it were a tube amp a power transformer it could easily support 500 watts or more they're that big, about 40-50lbs on or about. With modern class-D amplifiers being as efficient as they are, these older AB poweramps are functionally obsolete so unless there's a good reason to keep them operating (like a good vintage solidstate amp), swapping out the power section for a class-D configuration will eliminate the need for a large transformer or any transformer at all with a SMPS PCB module. So long as the preamp section gets the correct voltages you'd be hard pressed to hear any difference, your back will feel the difference though with an amp that's 80% lighter than it was before, no joke.

  • @jutukka
    @jutukka 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Somebody just wanted to slightly modernize an amp which used tube technology which was totally obsolete already in the early 70's. And as we all can clearly see, that original design was not very compact either. Plenty of room inside the cabinet. So why not!👍

  • @jamesprice6381
    @jamesprice6381 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    kinda van halenish, using the slave signal to power other cabs fx etc

    • @HeadfirstAmps
      @HeadfirstAmps  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Agree, I was hoping it would work so I try loading it down and re-amping

  • @stringlocker
    @stringlocker 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I will admit I did skip around could you tell me what exactly that mod was

  • @dragannestorovic01
    @dragannestorovic01 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Damn….😂

  • @jasonsansome5579
    @jasonsansome5579 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Christ mate!! What idiot put all that power circuitry down at the input jack end? No wonder she hums a bit.. and I noticed the little oscillation when you turned the treble up.. the best fix involves wire cutters!! Seriously though, it will be a satisfying job to rebuild it as stock... This is the only TH-cam amp video that left me speechless!!

  • @333Lightspeed
    @333Lightspeed 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Give more Power and a 2. Cab :-) ???

  • @564df6g5h4d6f5g4h6d5
    @564df6g5h4d6f5g4h6d5 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Should have just left that alone. Buy a kit and forget about it.

    • @HeadfirstAmps
      @HeadfirstAmps  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It’s a 1971, it merits being restored

  • @Cpt_Adama
    @Cpt_Adama 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Easy, the solid state preamp is for that Ampeg sound for the death metal set, and the normal Marshall is for the Zeppelin set. All in one amp 🤣

  • @RobotYawn
    @RobotYawn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    GOJRIA!!

  • @heavybrett-al4082
    @heavybrett-al4082 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😮 who modded it? Doc Brown from back to the future?

    • @HeadfirstAmps
      @HeadfirstAmps  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Lol

    • @goodun2974
      @goodun2974 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      More like Hack to the Future now that I think about it.....

  • @Billywagner22
    @Billywagner22 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What in the actually hell?

  • @crabbdaddy05
    @crabbdaddy05 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Drive a wet dry wet rig?!