Dr David Frawley on Importance of Vedanta

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 21

  • @chrisbaven
    @chrisbaven 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thank you Dr David Frawley, Pandit Vamadeva Shastri !! I am so grateful for your work.

  • @sonitoni1
    @sonitoni1 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thanks for explaining the Vedanta

  • @lnbartstudio2713
    @lnbartstudio2713 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you very much for this.

  • @davidviler
    @davidviler 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir people like (U, Subramanian Swamy,Rajiv Malhotra, Francois Gautier, Stephen Knapp,Sushil Pandit,CK Raju and many more) should come together on a single floor.That would be great to see.I eagerly waiting this moment to come.

  • @jackfruit5232
    @jackfruit5232 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    great

  • @bmn-q1r
    @bmn-q1r 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🙏

  • @Yogi5D
    @Yogi5D 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amen

  • @penlight5289
    @penlight5289 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Srimad bhagavatam is the natural commentary of the Vedanta by the Author Himself. ... Srila Vyasadeva

  • @kapileshwarramachandra5083
    @kapileshwarramachandra5083 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir, namasthe. i came across a video where a very old person associated with great personalities/ figures, has said, in jyotishya, in the present yuga/transition we have to shift from parashara system to a naradiya paddithi/system. if you happen to come across the naradiya system/paddithi please do throw light on the subject to the world. namasthe sir.

  • @FernandoRaulAstrology
    @FernandoRaulAstrology 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent. Let us not confuse jewish subversive thought with western intellectual tradition when mentioning names like Marx and Freud.

  • @kunalvyasvlogs5485
    @kunalvyasvlogs5485 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    vedant

  • @PaulHoward108
    @PaulHoward108 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Advaita theory is not Vedānta. It's an incomplete description of the ultimate reality.
    CC Ādi 7.121: "In his Vedānta-sūtra Śrīla Vyāsadeva has described that everything is but a transformation of the energy of the Lord. Śaṅkarācārya, however, has misled the world by commenting that Vyāsadeva was mistaken. Thus he has raised great opposition to theism throughout the entire world."

    • @hinduhistory1407
      @hinduhistory1407 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Advaita is sub sect of Vedanta..
      Dont make false claims you liar

    • @benstimpson1947
      @benstimpson1947 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Advaita is not neo-Buddhism, as is so often thrown at it from other schools. It absolutely IS Vedanta.

    • @josef2012
      @josef2012 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Vivekanada would like a word...

    • @PaulHoward108
      @PaulHoward108 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Advaita is an aspect of Vedānta, but calling it Vedānta by itself is absolutely wrong. For example, advaita theory cannot explain how a jīva can become subordinated to matter and then get liberated.

    • @PaulHoward108
      @PaulHoward108 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Dharma Jigyasa Advaita is not a legitimate interpretation of Vedānta at all, regardless of how many people believe it. Read the latest commentary on the Vedānta-sūtras, _Conceiving the Inconceivable_, published by Shabda Press, if you want to understand.