I don't understand why the first case defendant is put under harsh criticism. The birth mother never wanted the couple to have her baby so the defendant isn't responsible for their travel fees. It's also hypocritical to say the defendant made inappropriate comments about the plaintiffs if they were doing the same thing. She personally knows them so if she felt they were concerned about material goods over a child, then it's worth mentioning. It seems to be true given they didn't bother listening to the mother in the first place and quickly demanded travel reimbursement.
It isn't the landlord responsibility to open your door at 3 am if you lock yourself out. If you are so stupid to not make sure the door doesn't lock , you deserve to be locked out..
They signed a contract... HOW IN THE HELL are you going against the grain Christina? Absolutely not ma'am....Boutta watch reruns of Judge Judy cause you not fair!
First case I think the baby's mother not the defendant is obligated to pay any fees made after the baby was granted to the defendant instead only because she didn't inform them to go home. Defendant and the mother are both dishonest people.
![일상 속 기분 좋음 [Proto disco meme]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/DwmEIaZ7XGQ/mqdefault.jpg)
The defendant in the first case didn't know when to shut her big mouth. No wonder Judge Cristina Perez had to kick her out of the courtroom.
They all didn't know when to shut up honestly.
I don't understand why the first case defendant is put under harsh criticism. The birth mother never wanted the couple to have her baby so the defendant isn't responsible for their travel fees. It's also hypocritical to say the defendant made inappropriate comments about the plaintiffs if they were doing the same thing. She personally knows them so if she felt they were concerned about material goods over a child, then it's worth mentioning. It seems to be true given they didn't bother listening to the mother in the first place and quickly demanded travel reimbursement.
This landlord is horrible!!! If being locked 🔒 out your apartment at 3am is not an emergency then what is?
It isn't the landlord responsibility to open your door at 3 am if you lock yourself out. If you are so stupid to not make sure the door doesn't lock , you deserve to be locked out..
Glad defendant won first case- it's important blood siblings grow up together.
She started out fine, but she couldn't keep her comments/opinions to herself.
@@14kchang Yea. Ms. Tripoli's big mouth got her kicked out of the courtroom.
@@Otto8845 Hee immature and imoulsive behaviour shiws that she's probably nit a good Mother
I cant believe a lock out wasnt considered an emergency wowwwww lol
Landlord is ridiculous
none of these 3 are fit to be parents
It’s disgusting how she can’t control her courtroom
If they had to go to the bathroom, on the balcony, she would understand fast the error of her ways.
They signed a contract... HOW IN THE HELL are you going against the grain Christina? Absolutely not ma'am....Boutta watch reruns of Judge Judy cause you not fair!
Pay the man mess up and crazy landlord 👏👏 smh!!!
First case I think the baby's mother not the defendant is obligated to pay any fees made after the baby was granted to the defendant instead only because she didn't inform them to go home. Defendant and the mother are both dishonest people.