@@stayhungry1503Trump don't have any leverage as he's one of culprit and loser in this war. Russian dictate the term as they see fit. SMO will continue until they meet their objectives
Russian doctrine seems to have evolved significantly since the begninng of the war. At the start they were still relying on the Soviet doctrine of overwhelming mechanized waves (going to back to WW2's Deep Battle), but their tactics now remind much more of late WW1 German assualt tactics, relying on small combat teams trying to exploit weakpoints while avoiding strongpoint. If nothing else, the Ukraine war served as the best possible training ground for building a modern Russian army...
@erikwallen4483 Another armchair General. Russian tactics have evolved, but the biggest operational development is Kursk, where matador's cape first flourished, enabling a greater palette of options available to the Russian General Staff Command. The tactics you've touched upon, are meat and drink in the six years it takes to train a Russian Officer. There were no 'mechanised' or 'meat' waves when the Soviet General Staff Command overwhelmed the Prussian Military Academy inner school.
Uh, you might want to do a search on "Brusilov offensive"? It was a Russian general Aleksei Brusilov who pioneered those World War 1 tactics that broke the trenches.
@@andersonarmstrong2650 Meat-wave is a purely propaganda term, used to denigrate the opposing side towards your own civilian population. It has no military meaning. However, I do stand by the assessment that early war Russian tactics evolved around mechanized waves much more than today. My understanding is that this doctrine prioritizes larger movements aiming at breaking through and then enveloping the enemy from the rear. But what we've seen in Ukraine is that combined with a lack of air superiority and the usage small drones and precision artillery, this doesn't work anymore, since your mechanized vehicles become easy targets. The Russians suffered heavy losses in their early mechanized attacks (such as Ugledar, back in early 2023). The solution we've come up with seems to be small squads moving both with and without mechanized cover, aiming at seizing key and foremost defendable positions, which can then be held. This leads to the leap-frogging advances we are seeing, where ground is chipped away bit by bit. Western analysts love to denigrate the Russian tactics as "devolving to world war 1", trying to conjure up images of the first day of the Somme, when in reality they are much more "spring of 1918". NATO clings on to the notion that they can still do mechanized waves "right", but I suspect that NATO would suffer the same fate if they tried applying the same tactics. Summer offensive of 2023 anyone?
@@erikwallen4483 To be honest i see how Israel army (closest thing to NATO army which currently take part in actual serious combat) act...Well... if they fought like this in Ukraine - they would lost half of their tanks and artillery in a week (like how they tight close parking whole tank and artillery brigades in open field...as if this is not was but supermarket parking - one rocker strike and all this stuff gone. And we even did not start speaking about drones... . At this point of time Ukranian army is stronger and way more experience than most of Nato armies (like France, Germany or Great Britain)
@@Slimedog1963 while the west is busy covering story about North Koreans soldier involvement in this war, they forgot another “army” that actually help the Russian in the past 😅
General winter might only help in the north of Ukraine. In the southern areas like Kherson or Zaporozhiye the weather is pretty mild even during winter time
@@Chosen_Ash And at that time Russia had a very bad economy and was not prepared for a conflict at all, today it's very different. NATO and Germany are doomed.
Exactly, and the "real" Russian steamroller hasn't even started yet, as this is just a Special Military Operation for the Russians. For them it's more of a civil conflict of brother against brother incited by NATO, not war. In any case NATO and Europe have no chance, they are doomed.
I still stand by my initial assessment. At the beginning I predicted a 17-year conflict provided nothing changed, which is when Ukraine would run out of enough population to put up a fight. Now it all depends on what kind of financial support NATO can keep providing Ukraine. If they don't, then it can be over in about 2 years. We'll have to wait and see.
"Hit 'em where they ain't." This American baseball expression reflects the idea that you hit the ball where there are no fielders. Likewise The Bear is basing its strategy on taking advantage of weaknesses where Ukrainians have little or no defensive capability. The recent "shocking" advance into northern Kupiansk is just one example. So why didn't they do this from the gitgo? 'Cuz they underestimated their opponent and its material/psychological resources, including NATO assistance. As a consequence they had insufficient resources of their own. But hey, they keep learning! They keep learning!
its not as simple , 800k fallen ukrop soldiers and 120k bear soldiers (BBC )tell some different aspects of your baseballtheory , as in baseball there is no tenfold reserve, and in baseball 2 teams fight each other and not the material of 52 teams aginst 1 when it started it was 1 000 000 soldiers, radar and satelites from nato plus exess modern equipment against about 250 000 with the recources of 1 country so it was never a fair baseball match , and they first had to clear spots to be empty , so your theory would work , seems to me they did quiet good work (robota), if i compare american wars against flipflop soldiers without air defence where Us troops had and will have to run away from --- i rest me case
@@doogmann Generally agreed, although your figures seem way outta line. Where'd ya get the 800K to 100K casualty ratio; even if it were true it's hard to believe BBC would broadcast them. Weeb cites Mediazona, a more neutral site, which bases its figures on funerals for military-age men. They suggest losses are about even, at least now, at roughly 3,000 killed or seriously wounded for each side each month. Who knows really?
@@jonshive5482 Mediazona are partners with the BBC. See if you can find videos of Ukraine cemeteries. They've become filled to overflowing. Don't trust Ukrainian figures. At this point there are 77k confirmed Russian deaths. I just looked. Back in the spring Ursula von der Leyen let slip there were over 100K deaths for Ukraine.
The Ukie fortifications are just laid out so poorly, literally all of them can be easily flanked, cut off or just completely circumvented. It's just single squiggly lines stretching in for miles and isolated "block houses". No depth, no layering, huge gaps and no chance to mutually suport eachother.
Zelenskyy needs to announce that Ukraine is withdrawing from Kursk and the lands east of the Oskil river if Ukraine wants any chance of stopping the Russian advance in southern Donetsk prior to Trump getting back in. These are two fronts which no longer serve any strategic purpose for Ukraine.
Maybe its just my humble opinion, but could you remove the two light blue marks of Sumy and Charkiv and the red mark of Kursk please? For me it is a little bit irritating. But let the majority decide!
can't the difficulty of either side to advance safely act as the "security guarantee" to start negotiations? (unless something dramatic happens pretty soon I think both sides should just stop)
The rate of Russian advance seems to be increasing. I wonder if it is possible to report the number of square kilometers "liberated" each week and compare it to previous weeks? From the Russian Military perspective they are more concerned with "demilitarization". In that case, the number of resources eliminated each week is more important. The military summary channel reports (via google sheets) the AFU resources lost each day.
I play death metal in the Ukrainian Village part of my town , we have hundreds of new single Ukrainian mothers that need some loving , is that insensitive?
Zelensky didn't try to prevent the conflict through diplomacy because he lacks honor and integrity. In 2014 there was a coup. Soon after, there was a massacre in Odessa (dozens of people were burned alive). Ethnic Russians living in Ukraine were treated as subhuman. Their language and culture was being oppressed. A civil war broke out due to the rise in ethnic tensions. For 8 years the Ukrainian military was indiscriminately shelling civilians living in Donbas. If Zelensky honored the Minsk agreement and pledged neutrality, none of this would have happened. The 8 year civil war would have ended and Donbas would have remained part of Ukraine. War is the ultimate failure of diplomacy. Zelensky, Poroshenko, Merkel and Hollande admitted that Ukraine had no intention to honor the Minsk agreements. Who didn't want peace? Who advised against the 2022 peace talks in April? Hint: someone visited Zelensky in Kiev at that time. Russia's national security was compromised once NATO began to expand eastwards. Russia clearly stated that Ukraine joining NATO was a red line (November 2021) and unfortunately this concern was never taken seriously. The Russians openly stated: if nothing changes, we will be forced to act in order to defend our national security. Enhancing the national security of one country at the expense of another is unacceptable. The Russians have legitimate security concerns. 20th September, 2021: Ukraine launched military drills with US and NATO. NATO is not a defensive alliance. NATO illegally bombed Yugoslavia (a direct violation of the U.N. Charter). We should never forget what they did to Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq etc. Who blew up the pipeline causing an environmental disaster? Zelensky banned all opposition and arrested a leading priest. Zelensky tried to invoke article 5 under false pretenses. Remember the incident in Poland. Ethnic Russians living in Ukraine were treated as subhuman. Their language and culture was being oppressed. Poroshenko said, “Our children will go to schools and kindergartens-theirs will hide in the basements”. Russians will never forget the 2014 Odessa massacre. The whole world needs to know about it. Why was Denis Kireev eliminated? He was a member of Ukraine's negotiating team during the peace negotiations. He wanted to help his country. Ukraine has a hit list. They target artists, journalists and ordinary citizens. Hundreds of children are on this list. 13 year old Faina Savenkova was placed on this list. Pink Floyd's Roger Waters is on this list. Jimmy Dore (American stand-up comedian, podcaster) and Aaron Maté (Canadian writer and journalist) are on this list. There is evidence that Ukrainian troops have been indiscriminately shelling civilians in Donbas (they used petal mines and targeted areas where there was no military presence). The azov troops trapped in the azovstal steelworks in Mariupol used human shields. They refused to allow civilians to leave despite of humanitarian corridors being present. Russia held a proposed cease fire in order for the civilians to leave, but azov would not allow the civilians to leave. Ukraine has committed many acts of terrorism (car bombs and other forms of assassination). Darya Dugina (journalist) R.I.P. The first terrorist attack on the Kerch bridge killed the truck driver and the individuals in the adjacent car (innocent civilian victims). The second terrorist attack on the Kerch bridge killed two parents and severely injured their young daughter. I have done a lot of research and it took me a long time to write this comment. I have stated a lot of facts and I have given my honest opinion. I have provided a brief summary of events that took place. In order to explain this whole situation in great detail, a book would need to be written. Hopefully someone will write an UNBIASED book, stating facts and allowing the readers to form their own judgments. Everything I said can be fact checked and verified.
We are living in some exiting times. Good, they are not - but exicting nontheless. When some random dude on the internet continues to expose the lies of our multi million dollar mass media with such ease one might just wonder what else might also unravel in the future.
If Trump is to replicate what Putin has achieved in Russia, first he must make it illegal for any American with dual citizenship to hold any public or military office, at any level.. America first needs to become America only.
I don't see how Russia can conclude this war achieving their stated objectives. Even the most optimistic estimations are Russia is nowhere near mobilized sufficiently to cross the Dnieper River and take Odessa. Only an advance of that magnitude can force Ukraine to the bargaining table to actually agree to the stated aims that include disarming Ukraine to a token military and regime change, as well as enforced respect for the rights of Russian speakers. And just this week there was a reported briefing to Ukraine's Ministry of Defense claiming up to 7 tons of reactor plutonium, sufficient for hundreds of small yield weapons about 1 / 10 the second bomb at Nagasaki.
First of all taking Odessa is not an official goal because it's unrealistic and Russians are not looking to cross Dniper River because Russia does not havr the manpower and Ukraine can easily defend the Dniper and to bring Ukraine to negotiating table it will be enough to take over whole Donbass and Zaporzhizia that will mean Ukraine would have lost nearly 30% of its territory which will force Ukraine to come to table although I dont think Russia will be able to get much concessions from Ukraine other then staying neutral on top of it in no way West will let Ukraine develop nuclear weapons
In your opinion, nothing changes for Ukrainians over the course of the war? I'll tell you a secret, if Russia reaches Odessa, then by that time the Ukrainian army will be so exhausted that it will surrender the city faster than another village is now on the front line... A year ago, they could hold an important city for months, now the Russians capture cities in a week or a month, as well as defensive structures that seemed impregnable a year ago. Think more broadly, this is a war of attrition, Russia's main goal is to destroy the enemy's army, and territories come as a bonus. There are no normal trenches beyond the Dnieper, and there is a serious shortage of people in Ukraine. When everything reaches beyond the borders of Donbass, everything will fall down even faster for Ukrainians there
Why cross the Dnieper before the collapse of the UAF, just look how much territory is on the left bank of the Dniepr. Also the Dnieper is already crossed, in the North(Belarus), so there is no need to cross it again. The russians also have no interest in negotiations, unless the ukranians just accept every russian demand(not actual negotiations just capitulation with a different name). Zelensky and Ukraine might want a bomb, but it's not as easy as they make it out to be. They would need a massive nuclear program, complemented by a massive rocket program. Not going to happen while they are fighting for survival. There never was a nuclear program in Ukraine, just nuclear weapons of the old USSR. Were there ukranian scientists working on nuclear weapons? Yes, but not alone, part of huge complex. It's like saying that if some engineers that build the B2 bomber went to Egypt, they can buil a B2 bomber. No, they couldn't, they would have 0 industrial base for such an enterprise. What Ukraine could do is build a dirty bomb. Just put explosives in a drone, some plutinonium, and you would have a dirty bomb. It would not be more effective than a regular explosion, it would just contaminate the are, until the scrub teams arrive. Actual damage would be minimal, whatever the target is. The risk? Complete anihilation, as the nuclear red line has been crossed. Not one country in the world would support Ukraine. The russians would be free to do a Gaza with actual nukes, or whatever they wanted for revenge. Doubtful Ukraine would be allowed to exist.
@@musehtaicho You cultists always bring up Israel. Since the day after Israel was founded, it has been unilaterally invaded by the Arab countries around it. Some Arab countries have recently adopted a conciliatory approach after receiving severe retaliation, but terrorists continue to launch missile attacks on Israeli territory from abroad. For Israel, this is an exercise of its right to self-defense. However, even though Russia has not been attacked at all, it has created a delusional enemy based on a victim mentality and unilaterally invaded its peaceful neighbor. We need to recognize that the issues of Israel and Ukraine are fundamentally different.
Russians with their roubles can buy a home while Americans with their dollars can't afford to pay rent. But by all means bask in the glory of rigged currency exchange rate while it still lasts. Dedollarization of the world has begun and USA can't stop it with their threats and bullying this time
@@TwWolf-fm9dj at the start of Russias invasion, that same egg that cost 84 RUB now costs over 100 RUB. I don’t have any point bigger than what the numbers already speak volumes about. This is generally what happens when a country spends $25 MillionUSD per day, for the last 1000 days on IFVs that are getting destroyed faster than they can be built or paid for.
I have been following your channel since a year , I believe the russian army is not gaining and to put things in the right perspective, suppose the red army in the second world war was moving in this manner , I think the red army wouldn't reach Berlin before 2200
Two completely different wars. Rapid advancement is possible only if one side has tanks, and other side dont have any sufficient number of anti-tank weaponry.
Russians deployed in to ukraine aprox 400-450k including 100-150k still in Russia on northern borders. Facing aprox 1,5milion troops initially. Soviet deployment in ww2 10milion+ troops facing 2milion initialy. Plus all the countries thsf switch sides depend on which country arrived at their borders, yes that's Ukraine, Romania, Latvia, Estonia, lithuania, etc... which increased soviet strength by further 2-4milions You comparing pears to plums
I'm surprised to see this kind of view even now. It's a war of attrition. Once one side is weakened enough, there will come a tipping point. And that's when all the movement will happen.
Soviet army was 4 million soldiers. This one is about 500-700 thousands. The thing you miss this a special operation, not a total sacred war Soviet Union declared during WW2. Russia using just a part of it's army and mobilizing potential.
Freedom and democracy are always things that are fought for and won, and cannot be maintained or sustained by lip service or by "good-naturedness." It goes without saying that freedom cannot be maintained by honesty alone. The use of force against those who undermine these ideals or behave in a completely opposite manner will inevitably be proportionate to the degree of the ferocity of the adversary. At least when the United States intervenes militarily, it always unwaveringly proclaims universal ideals such as the establishment of "freedom, democracy, and humanitarianism." However, the only thing that comes out of the mouths of Russian and Chinese leaders is "the glory and domination of the Russian and Chinese nations." Which of the two, the United States or "Russia and China," would humankind, who aspire to freedom and independence, want to see ruled by? The answer is self-evident.
![fellow fellow - พรุ่งนี้ไม่มีใครรู้ feat. INK WARUNTORN [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QP6JyjYx_W0/mqdefault.jpg)
![Chris Langan - The Interview THEY Didn't Want You To See - CTMU [Full Version; Timestamps]](/img/n.gif)
thats what we call a MAJOR update. lets go!
I went to Ukraine yesterday but couldn't find any NATO bots there..
@@andersonarmstrong2650 yeah and not like those useless "most interesting update" from the other one.
@@andersonarmstrong2650 Have you looked in the mirror?
It's November. The weather is getting cold. Ukrainians like getting into Russian cauldrons which keeps them warm.
😂👍🏻
Makes a lot more sense now, thanks.
Not funny to make jokes with people who are dying all over the place.
they like to get surrounded all over he front 😂
@@imrualquais5867 Nobody's making fun of the soldiers themselves but of the idiotic officers who keep trapping their troops inside these cauldrons.
it's the first time movement in Gulyaipole happened since 2022
there were some minor changes before
Capturing 59 sq km in a day , that’s really a major update . Thanks for updating us Weeb ♥️
It's honestly not much but it just shows how much the frontline changes have accelerated compared to last year
@ yes , the deterioration of Ukraine defenses can be seen by how fast Russians are moving all along the frontline.
@@candymochi1Important thing here is, that they are in the last big defensive positions. If they fall, its open buffet
@@TheRebelAllianceAreTerroristsIn the April this year Russia has taken 146 sq km so for me this is big acceleration of the advancements
@@MaxFreibier yes exactly.
7:27 you kinda forgot, that place is flooded, right? So the defenders there supposedly will withdraw to Shevchenko instead.
maybe theyve got canoes?
They got their flippers, mask and snorkel.
@@harkbelial Shovels vs snorkels
That would be sound decision making according to the situation on the ground, the Ukies don't do that. 😂
@@stayhungry1503 Bradleys can't swim (literally)
Right on time for the update, thanks ❤
dont think Ive ever seen this many icons in a video before, wow
Thank you for the update Weeb! Great analysis!
Thank you for the good work, Weeb! 👍🏻
The best update this month, thank you
its been a long time since i saw this massive advances all along the front
they dont have much time, they have to take as much as possible until trumps inauguration.
Das Tauziehen an diesen wichtigen Fronten.
That is releveant how? Do you honestly think that man is gonna have say in anything? @@stayhungry1503
@@stayhungry1503 Because Trump will do - "what"!?? 😂
@@stayhungry1503Trump don't have any leverage as he's one of culprit and loser in this war. Russian dictate the term as they see fit. SMO will continue until they meet their objectives
Thanks Weeb 🙏
Another great report, thank you Weeb.
Russian doctrine seems to have evolved significantly since the begninng of the war. At the start they were still relying on the Soviet doctrine of overwhelming mechanized waves (going to back to WW2's Deep Battle), but their tactics now remind much more of late WW1 German assualt tactics, relying on small combat teams trying to exploit weakpoints while avoiding strongpoint.
If nothing else, the Ukraine war served as the best possible training ground for building a modern Russian army...
They definitely have a capable army now, no doubt.
@erikwallen4483 Another armchair General. Russian tactics have evolved, but the biggest operational development is Kursk, where matador's cape first flourished, enabling a greater palette of options available to the Russian General Staff Command. The tactics you've touched upon, are meat and drink in the six years it takes to train a Russian Officer.
There were no 'mechanised' or 'meat' waves when the Soviet General Staff Command overwhelmed the Prussian Military Academy inner school.
Uh, you might want to do a search on "Brusilov offensive"? It was a Russian general Aleksei Brusilov who pioneered those World War 1 tactics that broke the trenches.
@@andersonarmstrong2650 Meat-wave is a purely propaganda term, used to denigrate the opposing side towards your own civilian population. It has no military meaning.
However, I do stand by the assessment that early war Russian tactics evolved around mechanized waves much more than today. My understanding is that this doctrine prioritizes larger movements aiming at breaking through and then enveloping the enemy from the rear. But what we've seen in Ukraine is that combined with a lack of air superiority and the usage small drones and precision artillery, this doesn't work anymore, since your mechanized vehicles become easy targets. The Russians suffered heavy losses in their early mechanized attacks (such as Ugledar, back in early 2023).
The solution we've come up with seems to be small squads moving both with and without mechanized cover, aiming at seizing key and foremost defendable positions, which can then be held. This leads to the leap-frogging advances we are seeing, where ground is chipped away bit by bit.
Western analysts love to denigrate the Russian tactics as "devolving to world war 1", trying to conjure up images of the first day of the Somme, when in reality they are much more "spring of 1918".
NATO clings on to the notion that they can still do mechanized waves "right", but I suspect that NATO would suffer the same fate if they tried applying the same tactics. Summer offensive of 2023 anyone?
@@erikwallen4483 To be honest i see how Israel army (closest thing to NATO army which currently take part in actual serious combat) act...Well... if they fought like this in Ukraine - they would lost half of their tanks and artillery in a week (like how they tight close parking whole tank and artillery brigades in open field...as if this is not was but supermarket parking - one rocker strike and all this stuff gone. And we even did not start speaking about drones...
.
At this point of time Ukranian army is stronger and way more experience than most of Nato armies (like France, Germany or Great Britain)
Tak for opdatering
I KNEW IT! They’re waiting for General Winter to assist them for this offensive
Russia is known for their winter offensives...its going to be a very bad winter for Ukraine.
@@Slimedog1963 while the west is busy covering story about North Koreans soldier involvement in this war, they forgot another “army” that actually help the Russian in the past 😅
General winter might only help in the north of Ukraine.
In the southern areas like Kherson or Zaporozhiye the weather is pretty mild even during winter time
@@MissingThe90sIn the south they have general mud helping them.
It's more so that rasputitsa is hell, but frozen ground would allow to shift back to more active offensive operations.
Germany: You can't win a war against Russia.
zelensky: Why?
Germany: Because we have already tried and it didn't end well for us.
Germany had more men and a better economy (even if it was split up)
@@Chosen_Ash Yet still couldn't do it.
@@Chosen_Ash And at that time Russia had a very bad economy and was not prepared for a conflict at all, today it's very different. NATO and Germany are doomed.
In military jargon there is a saying about the "Russian steamroller". Now we see it in action..
Exactly, and the "real" Russian steamroller hasn't even started yet, as this is just a Special Military Operation for the Russians. For them it's more of a civil conflict of brother against brother incited by NATO, not war. In any case NATO and Europe have no chance, they are doomed.
it's ukrover
It's joever
I dont think this will last very much longer.. Ukraine is on their last legs.
I still stand by my initial assessment. At the beginning I predicted a 17-year conflict provided nothing changed, which is when Ukraine would run out of enough population to put up a fight. Now it all depends on what kind of financial support NATO can keep providing Ukraine. If they don't, then it can be over in about 2 years. We'll have to wait and see.
Thank you 👍🏻
Russia has a winning military strategy, Ukraine and NATO have a PR strategy. The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
"Hit 'em where they ain't." This American baseball expression reflects the idea that you hit the ball where there are no fielders. Likewise The Bear is basing its strategy on taking advantage of weaknesses where Ukrainians have little or no defensive capability. The recent "shocking" advance into northern Kupiansk is just one example. So why didn't they do this from the gitgo? 'Cuz they underestimated their opponent and its material/psychological resources, including NATO assistance. As a consequence they had insufficient resources of their own. But hey, they keep learning! They keep learning!
its not as simple , 800k fallen ukrop soldiers and 120k bear soldiers (BBC )tell some different aspects of your baseballtheory , as in baseball there is no tenfold reserve, and in baseball 2 teams fight each other and not the material of 52 teams aginst 1
when it started it was 1 000 000 soldiers, radar and satelites from nato plus exess modern equipment against about 250 000 with the recources of 1 country
so it was never a fair baseball match , and they first had to clear spots to be empty , so your theory would work , seems to me they did quiet good work (robota),
if i compare american wars against flipflop soldiers without air defence where Us troops had and will have to run away from --- i rest me case
@@doogmann Generally agreed, although your figures seem way outta line. Where'd ya get the 800K to 100K casualty ratio; even if it were true it's hard to believe BBC would broadcast them.
Weeb cites Mediazona, a more neutral site, which bases its figures on funerals for military-age men. They suggest losses are about even, at least now, at roughly 3,000 killed or seriously wounded for each side each month. Who knows really?
@@jonshive5482 Mediazona are partners with the BBC. See if you can find videos of Ukraine cemeteries. They've become filled to overflowing. Don't trust Ukrainian figures. At this point there are 77k confirmed Russian deaths. I just looked. Back in the spring Ursula von der Leyen let slip there were over 100K deaths for Ukraine.
@@jonshive5482 Mediazona on BBC payroll
so much for the muddy season huh?
Nope not this year . There was little to no muddy soil this year
The Ukie fortifications are just laid out so poorly, literally all of them can be easily flanked, cut off or just completely circumvented. It's just single squiggly lines stretching in for miles and isolated "block houses". No depth, no layering, huge gaps and no chance to mutually suport eachother.
The monies were spent in Paris.
thank you for another great analysis
It started 🍿
*Trump calls Zelensky* ------------ Zelensky hears just two words -------------- *YOU'RE FIRED !!!!*
Trump hears two words from Jewlensky -- "Gimme munney."
Exactly, he is on CIA payroll.
@@PaxAlotin that's 3. Or this, You are F
Remember when we ruminated about single farms in Robotyne and small city blocks in Bakhmut? It is getting serious now...
EMOTIONAL DAMAGE!!!
Thank u to giving me the information u are thé best
Zelenskyy needs to announce that Ukraine is withdrawing from Kursk and the lands east of the Oskil river if Ukraine wants any chance of stopping the Russian advance in southern Donetsk prior to Trump getting back in. These are two fronts which no longer serve any strategic purpose for Ukraine.
Now why would Zelensky listen to good advice?
He think she is smarter than everyone else
Thanks :)
This front was quite for a long time.
Nice vid. 👍
Peace is coming
Amen 🙏 to that
Did any milk beard take up the Weeb challenge?
WOW!
Zelansky: don't worry we have a victory plan
Maybe its just my humble opinion, but could you remove the two light blue marks of Sumy and Charkiv and the red mark of Kursk please? For me it is a little bit irritating. But let the majority decide!
Where is iron man and Superman
Where did they get all the shovels from? 😮
What about Zaporoshye city? Any updates.
Is Weeb still doing that idea about debates he mentioned a couple of reports ago? I have a couple of things I'd like to talk about
can't the difficulty of either side to advance safely act as the "security guarantee" to start negotiations? (unless something dramatic happens pretty soon I think both sides should just stop)
The rate of Russian advance seems to be increasing. I wonder if it is possible to report the number of square kilometers "liberated" each week and compare it to previous weeks? From the Russian Military perspective they are more concerned with "demilitarization". In that case, the number of resources eliminated each week is more important. The military summary channel reports (via google sheets) the AFU resources lost each day.
🎉
just for no reason what's your favourite band?
weezer😱
ManowaR !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 💪💪💪⚔
One direction do not judge me pls
Consider yourself judged and found lacking. But in all seriousness you do you
I play death metal in the Ukrainian Village part of my town , we have hundreds of new single Ukrainian mothers that need some loving , is that insensitive?
Zelensky didn't try to prevent the conflict through diplomacy because he lacks honor and integrity.
In 2014 there was a coup. Soon after, there was a massacre in Odessa (dozens of people were burned alive). Ethnic Russians living in Ukraine were treated as subhuman. Their language and culture was being oppressed. A civil war broke out due to the rise in ethnic tensions. For 8 years the Ukrainian military was indiscriminately shelling civilians living in Donbas.
If Zelensky honored the Minsk agreement and pledged neutrality, none of this would have happened. The 8 year civil war would have ended and Donbas would have remained part of Ukraine. War is the ultimate failure of diplomacy.
Zelensky, Poroshenko, Merkel and Hollande admitted that Ukraine had no intention to honor the Minsk agreements.
Who didn't want peace? Who advised against the 2022 peace talks in April? Hint: someone visited Zelensky in Kiev at that time.
Russia's national security was compromised once NATO began to expand eastwards. Russia clearly stated that Ukraine joining NATO was a red line (November 2021) and unfortunately this concern was never taken seriously. The Russians openly stated: if nothing changes, we will be forced to act in order to defend our national security. Enhancing the national security of one country at the expense of another is unacceptable. The Russians have legitimate security concerns.
20th September, 2021: Ukraine launched military drills with US and NATO.
NATO is not a defensive alliance. NATO illegally bombed Yugoslavia (a direct violation of the U.N. Charter).
We should never forget what they did to Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq etc.
Who blew up the pipeline causing an environmental disaster?
Zelensky banned all opposition and arrested a leading priest.
Zelensky tried to invoke article 5 under false pretenses. Remember the incident in Poland.
Ethnic Russians living in Ukraine were treated as subhuman. Their language and culture was being oppressed.
Poroshenko said, “Our children will go to schools and kindergartens-theirs will hide in the basements”.
Russians will never forget the 2014 Odessa massacre. The whole world needs to know about it.
Why was Denis Kireev eliminated? He was a member of Ukraine's negotiating team during the peace negotiations. He wanted to help his country.
Ukraine has a hit list. They target artists, journalists and ordinary citizens. Hundreds of children are on this list. 13 year old Faina Savenkova was placed on this list.
Pink Floyd's Roger Waters is on this list. Jimmy Dore (American stand-up comedian, podcaster) and Aaron Maté (Canadian writer and journalist) are on this list.
There is evidence that Ukrainian troops have been indiscriminately shelling civilians in Donbas (they used petal mines and targeted areas where there was no military presence).
The azov troops trapped in the azovstal steelworks in Mariupol used human shields. They refused to allow civilians to leave despite of humanitarian corridors being present.
Russia held a proposed cease fire in order for the civilians to leave, but azov would not allow the civilians to leave.
Ukraine has committed many acts of terrorism (car bombs and other forms of assassination). Darya Dugina (journalist) R.I.P.
The first terrorist attack on the Kerch bridge killed the truck driver and the individuals in the adjacent car (innocent civilian victims).
The second terrorist attack on the Kerch bridge killed two parents and severely injured their young daughter.
I have done a lot of research and it took me a long time to write this comment. I have stated a lot of facts and I have given my honest opinion.
I have provided a brief summary of events that took place. In order to explain this whole situation in great detail, a book would need to be written.
Hopefully someone will write an UNBIASED book, stating facts and allowing the readers to form their own judgments. Everything I said can be fact checked and verified.
So Russian treat the operation as a Marathon, not a 100m dash.
Ukros have multiple defence positions but...they dont have people inside
admin subtitel ?
?
Who is winning?
👍
7:41 They avoiding PuStynka for a reason 😷
It's so funny to read what the ideologically motivated copers are writing.
We are living in some exiting times. Good, they are not - but exicting nontheless. When some random dude on the internet continues to expose the lies of our multi million dollar mass media with such ease one might just wonder what else might also unravel in the future.
Russian entered Cherhiniv oblast
What is your source for that?
@@DonelloI heard the milblogger Suriyakmaps had a couple of videos showing Russia entering the oblast.
Vive la Franch Fried Bandera.
😎
Z!
St Putinsburg = Kiev… slava Russia 🇷🇺🇸🇪🇸🇪🇷🇺🇷🇺😊
Slava Shovel’s ❤️🤙🇷🇺
😅
ukronaze kaput 😏..ZOV🇷🇺☝️😏
Lot of ru ssi annnnn trolllssss😊
Trump !! Save the USA first ,your country first.
What is the point to help Ukraine when your own country is in danger?
If Trump is to replicate what Putin has achieved in Russia, first he must make it illegal for any American with dual citizenship to hold any public or military office, at any level..
America first needs to become America only.
thousandth
GG newbs
Z🇬🇭🇷🇺
clickbait, nothing ever happens
No disPutin the Putin
It's joever
Both sides need more mexicans
Why and what for?
PHIRST
First
still ukriane is winning says jake broe
I don't see how Russia can conclude this war achieving their stated objectives. Even the most optimistic estimations are Russia is nowhere near mobilized sufficiently to cross the Dnieper River and take Odessa. Only an advance of that magnitude can force Ukraine to the bargaining table to actually agree to the stated aims that include disarming Ukraine to a token military and regime change, as well as enforced respect for the rights of Russian speakers. And just this week there was a reported briefing to Ukraine's Ministry of Defense claiming up to 7 tons of reactor plutonium, sufficient for hundreds of small yield weapons about 1 / 10 the second bomb at Nagasaki.
First of all taking Odessa is not an official goal because it's unrealistic and Russians are not looking to cross Dniper River because Russia does not havr the manpower and Ukraine can easily defend the Dniper and to bring Ukraine to negotiating table it will be enough to take over whole Donbass and Zaporzhizia that will mean Ukraine would have lost nearly 30% of its territory which will force Ukraine to come to table although I dont think Russia will be able to get much concessions from Ukraine other then staying neutral on top of it in no way West will let Ukraine develop nuclear weapons
In your opinion, nothing changes for Ukrainians over the course of the war? I'll tell you a secret, if Russia reaches Odessa, then by that time the Ukrainian army will be so exhausted that it will surrender the city faster than another village is now on the front line... A year ago, they could hold an important city for months, now the Russians capture cities in a week or a month, as well as defensive structures that seemed impregnable a year ago. Think more broadly, this is a war of attrition, Russia's main goal is to destroy the enemy's army, and territories come as a bonus.
There are no normal trenches beyond the Dnieper, and there is a serious shortage of people in Ukraine. When everything reaches beyond the borders of Donbass, everything will fall down even faster for Ukrainians there
Why cross the Dnieper before the collapse of the UAF, just look how much territory is on the left bank of the Dniepr. Also the Dnieper is already crossed, in the North(Belarus), so there is no need to cross it again. The russians also have no interest in negotiations, unless the ukranians just accept every russian demand(not actual negotiations just capitulation with a different name). Zelensky and Ukraine might want a bomb, but it's not as easy as they make it out to be. They would need a massive nuclear program, complemented by a massive rocket program. Not going to happen while they are fighting for survival. There never was a nuclear program in Ukraine, just nuclear weapons of the old USSR. Were there ukranian scientists working on nuclear weapons? Yes, but not alone, part of huge complex. It's like saying that if some engineers that build the B2 bomber went to Egypt, they can buil a B2 bomber. No, they couldn't, they would have 0 industrial base for such an enterprise. What Ukraine could do is build a dirty bomb. Just put explosives in a drone, some plutinonium, and you would have a dirty bomb. It would not be more effective than a regular explosion, it would just contaminate the are, until the scrub teams arrive. Actual damage would be minimal, whatever the target is. The risk? Complete anihilation, as the nuclear red line has been crossed. Not one country in the world would support Ukraine. The russians would be free to do a Gaza with actual nukes, or whatever they wanted for revenge. Doubtful Ukraine would be allowed to exist.
@@VorbG The meat grinder.....
@@pvladimirSo well said I've no need to add anything else.
Propagand a channel
How reporting facts is propaganda? Where are those Sky news experts saying Ukraine was winning and Russia was about to run out of troops?
😅😅😅
The map looks the same, Odessa far away, The Ukrainian in Kursk...need I say more?
😂😂😂
No new narratives for 3 months. Meanwhile gains are 50 sq km per day.
The first priority is for the invading forces to withdraw from the occupied territories. Humanity will never tolerate injustice.
How many years they annually vote at UN for Israel withdrawal from occupied territories? Any progress?
What about USA withdraw from Iraq? I mean they occupy this country for 20+ years already
@@musehtaicho You cultists always bring up Israel.
Since the day after Israel was founded, it has been unilaterally invaded by the Arab countries around it. Some Arab countries have recently adopted a conciliatory approach after receiving severe retaliation, but terrorists continue to launch missile attacks on Israeli territory from abroad. For Israel, this is an exercise of its right to self-defense. However, even though Russia has not been attacked at all, it has created a delusional enemy based on a victim mentality and unilaterally invaded its peaceful neighbor. We need to recognize that the issues of Israel and Ukraine are fundamentally different.
@@Алексей545-т6б That should be proposed to President-elect Trump.
@@aburakadabura2 What i mean - start from yourself and do not lecture others until you manage to clean your own mess
1 USD = 100 RUB.
go to store to buy with your 1usd ..1 eg🤣...you fool
Russians with their roubles can buy a home while Americans with their dollars can't afford to pay rent. But by all means bask in the glory of rigged currency exchange rate while it still lasts. Dedollarization of the world has begun and USA can't stop it with their threats and bullying this time
1 usd = 155 yen, what is your point?
@@TwWolf-fm9dj at the start of Russias invasion, that same egg that cost 84 RUB now costs over 100 RUB. I don’t have any point bigger than what the numbers already speak volumes about.
This is generally what happens when a country spends $25 MillionUSD per day, for the last 1000 days on IFVs that are getting destroyed faster than they can be built or paid for.
@@ryanframe6893 At the start of Russias invasion average egg price in USA was 2 per dozen. Now it is 3.30. What is your point again?
I have been following your channel since a year , I believe the russian army is not gaining and to put things in the right perspective, suppose the red army in the second world war was moving in this manner , I think the red army wouldn't reach Berlin before 2200
Two completely different wars.
Rapid advancement is possible only if one side has tanks, and other side dont have any sufficient number of anti-tank weaponry.
Russians deployed in to ukraine aprox 400-450k including 100-150k still in Russia on northern borders. Facing aprox 1,5milion troops initially.
Soviet deployment in ww2 10milion+ troops facing 2milion initialy.
Plus all the countries thsf switch sides depend on which country arrived at their borders, yes that's Ukraine, Romania, Latvia, Estonia, lithuania, etc... which increased soviet strength by further 2-4milions
You comparing pears to plums
I'm surprised to see this kind of view even now.
It's a war of attrition. Once one side is weakened enough, there will come a tipping point. And that's when all the movement will happen.
Soviet army was 4 million soldiers. This one is about 500-700 thousands. The thing you miss this a special operation, not a total sacred war Soviet Union declared during WW2. Russia using just a part of it's army and mobilizing potential.
Essa não é uma guerra móvel como a segunda, é uma guerra estática como a primeira, a tecnologia evoluiu ao ponto de anular completamente o tanque
and still not collapsed
Clown is collapsed.
Well, Defence of Kurachovo is almost collapse
And?
Russia has two armies, general staff with many traitors and real red army fighting and forwarding.
☝️🤙
победа будет за нами!
Freedom and democracy are always things that are fought for and won, and cannot be maintained or sustained by lip service or by "good-naturedness." It goes without saying that freedom cannot be maintained by honesty alone.
The use of force against those who undermine these ideals or behave in a completely opposite manner will inevitably be proportionate to the degree of the ferocity of the adversary. At least when the United States intervenes militarily, it always unwaveringly proclaims universal ideals such as the establishment of "freedom, democracy, and humanitarianism." However, the only thing that comes out of the mouths of Russian and Chinese leaders is "the glory and domination of the Russian and Chinese nations." Which of the two, the United States or "Russia and China," would humankind, who aspire to freedom and independence, want to see ruled by? The answer is self-evident.
Trump !! Save the USA first ,your country first.
What is the point to help Ukraine when your own country is in danger?