Thank you counsel am a lawyer in kigali Rwanda I like your lecturer thank you I need to connect u for more engagements in terms legal proofing .Thank u Regards Daniel
Well said, Mr. Mutyaba. You are right that the Kingdom of Buganda has never been "equal" to any of the 14 major tribes that had joined the kingdom in the early 1900s to form what the British Administration called the "Uganda Protectorate." Hence, saying so does not make it so. Moreover, it is not a matter of the Baganda "feeling" that they are not equal to the rest. Actually, we the Baganda are not and never have been since the 1800s when the Kingdom gained the upper hand over the rest of her neighbours, establishing herself as a power to be reckoned with in the lake region of East Africa. That is what has spawned the bitter resentment since then against the kingdom by the rest of the country up until today. The Kingdom has no peer in everything in Uganda today, even though the rest of the country will never admit it. You may also be aware that the agreement had never been signed by any Kabaka of Buganda, the reigning Ssekabaka Mwanga II having been exiled in the Seychelles, as punishment for the persecution of the Christian converts in his kingdom. The kingdom was then in the hands of the chiefs you have mentioned, who had endorsed and signed it and not the Kabaka. This would come back to haunt the Governor Sir Andrew Cohen in 1953, when he withdrew his recognition of Ssekabaka Muteesa II sending him into exile. They had apparently disagreed reportedly over the thorny issue of the proposed federation of the east African British administered territories. The Kabaka refused to append his signature to documents the Governor had presented to him at Entebbe, according to Paulo Kavuma, the Katikkiro. The Kabaka would later be vindicated returning in triumph to his kingdom in 1955. It had been determined by law, that no Kabaka was bound by the agreement since none of them had signed it since then, and so, the governor had no authority to do what he had done. Furthermore, the court had asserted that the governor had the prerogative of withdrawing from the agreement but had failed to do so. Hence, the saying in Luganda after the verdit: (teyalina buyinza) - meaning that the governor had acted arbitrarily and without authority. Therefore, in reality the kingdom had never relinquished her autonomy up until then, and throughout 68 years of the British Administration of Uganda (1894-1962); the agreement notwithstanding. For example, you may recall the Mulira incident in the 1950s. The Kabaka had been accused of seducing his wife. The new Governor Sir Frederick Crawford was careful not to intervene for fear of overstepping his authority. The matter was then settled without interference from the British Administration at all, yet the governor had known about the alleged affair for some time but was powerless to act. Hence, the governor could do everything else that the agreement had stipulated, but he could never assail the Kabaka even if he had wanted to. Finally, that our country was called the "Uganda Protectorate" under the British Administration and not a "colony," is enough to show you the special status secured on behalf of the rest of the country by the auspices of the Kingdom of Buganda; regardless of the 1900 Agreement.
@apolokaggwa6521 You write value and reading through your comments is truly fulfilling. You display deep knowledge of historical facts & i am impressed and in agreement with your views. Thanks for the comments. They add context to the deep discussion and an informative source indeed.
@@MutyabaConrad Good to know, thanks, Conrad. I do appreciate your scholarly approach as a lawyer, to this and other important events that have taken place in Uganda since 1894. It is quite helpful to us who are not lawyers.
Why was sir Apollo Kagwa the Katikiro of Buganda kingdom, and he was a prisoner of war from Busoga who grew in Buganda kingdom?? This is the things that brought problems for our country Buganda...
The British had to undermining the king of Buganda or degraded him in the yr 1955😢😢😢😢😢 very sad..bcs two kingdoms can't be in the same country...one had to be down. The British and kingdom of Buganda
@@UgandaMotocross it's true. We still have land challenges in Buganda and Uganda generally, mainly caused by the Buganda agreement of 1900 & other factors.
![[TH] 2024 PMGC League | Survival Stage วันที่ 1 | PUBG MOBILE Global Championship](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FVFT-PFwU80/mqdefault.jpg)
Great clever young man thanks.
Thanks so much . Can you share bataka grievances and the Asians. 2 .The O.I.C
Wow this is great work my fellow council
Thanks so much I'm learning a lot
You are welcome
Thanks so much Counsel for the grt work
You are welcome
Very informative. Thank you very much
You are welcome
Thanks 🎉
Appreciate magis sed upload aliis gratias tibi
I appreciate your work sir
You are welcome
Thank you counsel am a lawyer in kigali Rwanda I like your lecturer thank you I need to connect u for more engagements in terms legal proofing .Thank u Regards Daniel
Hello Daniel. You are welcome. You can get in touch & we discuss the details. Thanks.
Thanks for the program
Musoke, Your welcome.
Thank u sir
Gd work done sir👍
Your welcome
Good work 👍
Thank you.
Thank you so much
You are welcome.
Big thanks sir
You are welcome
We've been getting bits of history here and there. This is like drinking from the well itself other than drinking from akadomola big up on you👍
Thank you. I wish u the best in your endavours
Good 😊
Great job
Your welcome.
Thank counsel
You are welcome
Is there a video befor this regarding margna carta
I would like private tutorial but I see no contacts
So counsel am I supposed to refer to the 1995 constitution
Well said, Mr. Mutyaba. You are right that the Kingdom of Buganda has never been "equal" to any of the 14 major tribes that had joined the kingdom in the early 1900s to form what the British Administration called the "Uganda Protectorate." Hence, saying so does not make it so. Moreover, it is not a matter of the Baganda "feeling" that they are not equal to the rest. Actually, we the Baganda are not and never have been since the 1800s when the Kingdom gained the upper hand over the rest of her neighbours, establishing herself as a power to be reckoned with in the lake region of East Africa. That is what has spawned the bitter resentment since then against the kingdom by the rest of the country up until today. The Kingdom has no peer in everything in Uganda today, even though the rest of the country will never admit it.
You may also be aware that the agreement had never been signed by any Kabaka of Buganda, the reigning Ssekabaka Mwanga II having been exiled in the Seychelles, as punishment for the persecution of the Christian converts in his kingdom. The kingdom was then in the hands of the chiefs you have mentioned, who had endorsed and signed it and not the Kabaka. This would come back to haunt the Governor Sir Andrew Cohen in 1953, when he withdrew his recognition of Ssekabaka Muteesa II sending him into exile. They had apparently disagreed reportedly over the thorny issue of the proposed federation of the east African British administered territories. The Kabaka refused to append his signature to documents the Governor had presented to him at Entebbe, according to Paulo Kavuma, the Katikkiro. The Kabaka would later be vindicated returning in triumph to his kingdom in 1955. It had been determined by law, that no Kabaka was bound by the agreement since none of them had signed it since then, and so, the governor had no authority to do what he had done. Furthermore, the court had asserted that the governor had the prerogative of withdrawing from the agreement but had failed to do so. Hence, the saying in Luganda after the verdit: (teyalina buyinza) - meaning that the governor had acted arbitrarily and without authority.
Therefore, in reality the kingdom had never relinquished her autonomy up until then, and throughout 68 years of the British Administration of Uganda (1894-1962); the agreement notwithstanding. For example, you may recall the Mulira incident in the 1950s. The Kabaka had been accused of seducing his wife. The new Governor Sir Frederick Crawford was careful not to intervene for fear of overstepping his authority. The matter was then settled without interference from the British Administration at all, yet the governor had known about the alleged affair for some time but was powerless to act. Hence, the governor could do everything else that the agreement had stipulated, but he could never assail the Kabaka even if he had wanted to. Finally, that our country was called the "Uganda Protectorate" under the British Administration and not a "colony," is enough to show you the special status secured on behalf of the rest of the country by the auspices of the Kingdom of Buganda; regardless of the 1900 Agreement.
@apolokaggwa6521 You write value and reading through your comments is truly fulfilling.
You display deep knowledge of historical facts & i am impressed and in agreement with your views. Thanks for the comments. They add context to the deep discussion and an informative source indeed.
@@MutyabaConrad Good to know, thanks, Conrad. I do appreciate your scholarly approach as a lawyer, to this and other important events that have taken place in Uganda since 1894. It is quite helpful to us who are not lawyers.
@@apolokaggwa6521 you are welcome.
Sir is it ,Nuwa Mbogo or Zakaria Kisigiri
thanks
You are welcome bonitah
We had to memorize all this in high school history.
What about Zakaria kizingiri
Why was sir Apollo Kagwa the Katikiro of Buganda kingdom, and he was a prisoner of war from Busoga who grew in Buganda kingdom?? This is the things that brought problems for our country Buganda...
Is it Nuwa Mbogo or Zakaria Kisigiri
What about the features 44:55
More explanation
How does someone give away themselves like this?
The British had to undermining the king of Buganda or degraded him in the yr 1955😢😢😢😢😢 very sad..bcs two kingdoms can't be in the same country...one had to be down. The British and kingdom of Buganda
Those of Noah and stanslus mugwanya were bribed
Well. Am not sure about that. 🤗
For sure be more audible
Noted
GREAT WORK BUT I WISH YOU WHERE MORE AUDIDLE YOU ARE LOW
There was nothing positive in this bogus and very disrespectful document to our land and it's people
Bt are we still following that nonsense to date?
The 1900 Buganda agreement is not binding law today.
Even after independence the British noose in our throats is still as tight as it was before we supposedly became independence.
No we are not
But this nonsense is still being reflected today especially in Buganda.. the search for independence of Buganda and the land question
@@UgandaMotocross it's true. We still have land challenges in Buganda and Uganda generally, mainly caused by the Buganda agreement of 1900 & other factors.
You have done me great, 🤝🫂
Thank you sir could you please help me have access to your number
@@TrustChristbell 0703490014
Thank you very much sir
Thank you so much
Thanks
You are welcome
Sir is it ,Nuwa Mbogo or Zakaria Kisigiri
Is it Nuwa Mbogo or Zakaria Kisigiri
Thank you so much
Sir is it ,Nuwa Mbogo or Zakaria Kisigiri
Sir is it ,Nuwa Mbogo or Zakaria Kisigiri