Totally cool wish i would of know about this before making tuning changes . To see which way i went -or + On HP . Still best day of the week Tech Tuesday
Learn something new every day 👍curious though, torque max is 640 like mentioned in the video. what do you do if you have let's say 900tq?, different engine management system (Holley efi/megasquirt, etc.)
The delivered engine torque maxes out at 640 ft-lbs, trans engine torque maxes at 885 ft-lbs. The engine torque parameter for me has gone up to 1150ft-lbs without maxing out so far. HP calculation shows about 1100 at 6000 rpms (ls3 vette with lots of boost). Guessing it is best to use the engine torque parameter instead.
On a gen 4 (E38 ECM) there is a "delivered engine torque" and just "engine torque" anybody have any idea what the differences are? I added them both to the channels and did some driving, they seem to be about the same as far as I can tell?
Question in the class downloads for Est TQ and Est HP from airflow for GM gen V there showing backwards on the scanner i think. The HP curve is flat and the TQ rises with rpms. The expression is different from this video
Thank you.
Years later this is still relevant.
Working on a LS1 1999 C5 Corvette.
I was literally trying to do this last week and couldn't figure out how thank you so much
This is awesome. Thanks guys !
You're welcome!
Totally cool wish i would of know about this before making tuning changes . To see which way i went -or + On HP . Still best day of the week Tech Tuesday
Yay Tech Tuesdays! Thanks for the feedback
Learn something new every day 👍curious though, torque max is 640 like mentioned in the video. what do you do if you have let's say 900tq?, different engine management system (Holley efi/megasquirt, etc.)
How do you add the delivered engine torque channel. I'm not finding it in the list
Nice! Thank you.
Thanks a lot man!
The delivered engine torque maxes out at 640 ft-lbs, trans engine torque maxes at 885 ft-lbs. The engine torque parameter for me has gone up to 1150ft-lbs without maxing out so far. HP calculation shows about 1100 at 6000 rpms (ls3 vette with lots of boost). Guessing it is best to use the engine torque parameter instead.
On a gen 4 (E38 ECM) there is a "delivered engine torque" and just "engine torque" anybody have any idea what the differences are? I added them both to the channels and did some driving, they seem to be about the same as far as I can tell?
Question in the class downloads for Est TQ and Est HP from airflow for GM gen V there showing backwards on the scanner i think. The HP curve is flat and the TQ rises with rpms. The expression is different from this video
Should you take out 20% for rear wheel hp to match a dyno or does it match the dyno pretty well like this ?
So I did it all right, added torque to the channel, added the new parimeter and nothing. But torque is reading when scanning
that doesnt work for mopars because we dont have the "delivered engine torque"
I assume the Horse Power numbers are Crank horse power. How close is it to rear wheel horse power??
Smith Improvments would add another calculation to remove drive train loss, which is estimated to be +-20% so multiply your function by .80
Just tried it with my truck and got it to work. It works pretty well but it's not perfect. Reads about 30hp high
Onalky87 where did you find the delivered engine torque pid? Can't even find it on the scanner
this does not work can someone help me?
If you go by N/M you will get an incorrectly high skewed number, felt better about my numbers before i figured this out lol
Cool to look at but I dont think the numbers are close to being accurate