Conjugate Beam Method - Tricky Continuous Beam with Cantilever Solved Example

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ส.ค. 2017
  • Difficult problem using the conjugate beam method. Tips and tricks on where to cut the beam and how to find slope and deflection.
    Link to the introduction to conjugate beams video: • Conjugate Beam Method ...
    VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT www.afmatheng.com/ !!!
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Now try to solve it on your OWN! Don't just "understand"... PRACTICE!!
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    AF MATH AND ENGINEERING - Students Helping Students!
    Join our Community! =)
    -------------------------------------
    Follow us on Twitter at / afmatheng
    Follow us on Facebook at AFMath1/?fre...
    #math #civilengineering #engineering #education #edchat #lrnchat #blendchat #mlearning #elearning #ipadchat #pblchat #passiondriven #blendedlearning #ccchat #ccss #commoncore #competencyed #curriculum #deeperlearning #digln #earlyed #edapp #eddata #edleaders #edpolicy #edtech #education #elearning #highschool #leadership #middleschool #literacy #engchat #mathchat #scichat #stem #highered #calculus

ความคิดเห็น • 42

  • @AFMathandEngineering
    @AFMathandEngineering  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Let us know if you want to see more structural analysis videos!
    Link to an our intro video and another example problem: th-cam.com/video/QsNvwRQVkBE/w-d-xo.html

  • @sushilbhutada1644
    @sushilbhutada1644 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    One location by mistake taken as 3.92 but actually it should be 3.82 and in one location while calculating displacement multiply dimension has taken 3/2 but it should be 2/3.

  • @billmorrison5908
    @billmorrison5908 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you are the man! this is a great video. thanks so much

  • @gopikaselvi4337
    @gopikaselvi4337 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's a very good video to understand the conjugate beam method of analysis...
    We need a clarification on resolving the 3span continuous beam with all the ends are simply supported. . Could you suggest us the trick.. !

  • @crunchbox7698
    @crunchbox7698 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks broo.. Now I fully understand 😉

  • @civilographybsbd1817
    @civilographybsbd1817 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanku that was really helpful.

  • @alpereneylenceoglu7404
    @alpereneylenceoglu7404 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are amazing. Thanks, Conjugate beam is easy for me after this video. 👍

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Alperen Eylenceoglu thanks so much! Were glad we could help you out!

  • @sonshadowshadow5546
    @sonshadowshadow5546 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If i maynot be wrong for getting deflection at D. ,you can calculate D(y) reaction at fix end and then taking only right side of internal hinge since moment =0 and calculate moment at fixed end will be easier .

  • @gigipensiri979
    @gigipensiri979 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you, I appreciate it

  • @markusbryant6789
    @markusbryant6789 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is there a reason why you can’t just split the hinge and find internal shear and moment without finding the reaction at D?

  • @apollodamonbuilders
    @apollodamonbuilders 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your sign convection for the moment was: Anticlockwise as positive, but when solving for moment of the conjugate at D, you took Ay as a negative moment yet it is in the anticlockwise direction. Why?

  • @harshitsingh6954
    @harshitsingh6954 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    what if we have to find deflection at b point

  • @badabc6969
    @badabc6969 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please make more

  • @orbital16
    @orbital16 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi there @10:22 about the term 564/70(2340) = 0.00344 rad.
    Dis you get that answer exactly it is? I am using Casio 991Es calculator and Im getting 3.4432x10^-3 which i still need to press the back arrow to get the answer youve got..

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      That level of accuracy is really not important, maybe if you had a really strict teacher, especially not in real life structural engineering.

  • @itsme-tg4dr
    @itsme-tg4dr 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    how you get the 3.92?

  • @gabrielefolino4005
    @gabrielefolino4005 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    isn't it 3.92 x (2/3) not (3/2) when finding moment @ C?

  • @Trump_Gaming
    @Trump_Gaming 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why didn't you take into account the parabolic loading when doing the reaction at A? You only did the 3 triangles.

  • @vhk26
    @vhk26 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great!

  • @vanbeet5105
    @vanbeet5105 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm a little confused about the sign convention you've used, is anti clockwise supposed to be positive or negative

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      van béet thanks for the comment! Can you give us an example of where you're confused specifically so we can help you out? Cheers :D

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Also to further clarify, Almost always the positive sign conventions we use for bending for beams is compression on top, tension on bottom and counterclockwise (+ve) for moments.

    • @vanbeet5105
      @vanbeet5105 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm not from the US, so probably the conventions we use are quite different.
      In other videos, i also noticed that in the drawing of the bending moment diagram, when the line or curve occurs below the baseline i. e if the beam sags, the moment is labeled as negative. At our university, we are taught that a sagging beam has positive moment, which is also clockwise

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I see. Everywhere has different convention. Usually in practice I'll draw the bending moment on the tension side of the beam, however in most textbooks it's on the opposite side for positive moment. I'm from canada btw :) thanks for sharing the different convention that you use at your school! What year are you currently in? Cheers!

    • @vanbeet5105
      @vanbeet5105 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm in second year, doing civil engineering
      Anyway, thanks for the great content, your videos have been very useful

  • @zjyub
    @zjyub 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    (2417060 Nm^3)/((706N/m^2)(0.00234m^4) does not equal 14mm?? Did you mean 706GPa?

  • @kennethdevera2561
    @kennethdevera2561 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    when you solved for the new reaction at A, why did you only consider moment at left of "C" and didn't include the parabolic side?

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because of the hinge at c, we can separate the beam into two parts, AC and CD and solve them independently.

    • @haeseoya3123
      @haeseoya3123 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AFMathandEngineering But why did you calculate all when you solved slope D and deflection D?

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because we need the reaction at the hinge.

  • @kkkkkkk-dl3qd
    @kkkkkkk-dl3qd 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    B or D? Im confused

  • @Corvanor
    @Corvanor 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Question says deflection and slope at B but you solved for D?

    • @AFMathandEngineering
      @AFMathandEngineering  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yea, question at the start should read slope and deflection at D. Thanks

  • @SURYA4407
    @SURYA4407 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How to solve a fixed beam by conjugate beam method