Anand Ranganathan Explosive On Waqf 'Reform' Row, Act Discriminatory Even Against Muslims?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.ย. 2024
  • Anand Ranganathan roars in Times Now debate show as Waqf Act 'Reform' row takes centre-stage. 'Waqf act has to go...' he asserts. Watch the video to know!
    #anandranganathan #anandranganathandebate #timesnow #debate #waqfact #waqfamendmentbill

ความคิดเห็น • 950

  • @subramayamrvr8774
    @subramayamrvr8774 หลายเดือนก่อน +359

    We need a Hindu wakf board for managing properties of Hindu temples and religious institutions of Hindus.

    • @rsv6603
      @rsv6603 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

      Not possible as INC did not define majority in the constitution.. Only minority appeasement option is available. 😂🤞🏼🙏🏼🧿!

    • @AR-yv3dj
      @AR-yv3dj หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      SC will declare it Unconstitutional 😅

    • @rsv6603
      @rsv6603 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      @@AR-yv3dj where is world talent Rahul ji? What's his decision on WAQF's amendments?

    • @r.m.bhoopathybhoopathy4166
      @r.m.bhoopathybhoopathy4166 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why state governments are controlling? Pappu cong.reply.

    • @sangeethk7251
      @sangeethk7251 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Devaswam board is used to manage temple....the members are from Hindu religion

  • @psrickyking
    @psrickyking หลายเดือนก่อน +166

    Dr Anand Ranganathan on fire spitting facts. waqf act needs to be abrogated.

    • @Neeta7878
      @Neeta7878 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Please give a history of WAQF boards in other countries also. Why? What? How?

    • @haridevsharma77
      @haridevsharma77 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Neeta7878what do you mean?

    • @sathideviraghavan9121
      @sathideviraghavan9121 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      @@psrickyking it's gift y nehru to his people calculated move towards gazwaye hind

    • @krishnaiyermani7334
      @krishnaiyermani7334 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Would you kindly give reasons for your above reply. K. Mani.

    • @ramachandrannair4554
      @ramachandrannair4554 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yes

  • @Raghuprasad1967
    @Raghuprasad1967 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

    Dr. Ranganathan explained that this WAQF act to be abolished. That is right.

    • @reddygajjala6002
      @reddygajjala6002 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I wonder why Modi Jee can not take Dr.Anand Ranganathan in to central cabinet just like DR.Jayashankar . Dr. Ranganathan is intelligent and clear understanding of the issues and PM should use his capabilities to the benefit of the country.

    • @ramachandrannair4554
      @ramachandrannair4554 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      No doubt. 🙏

  • @rajkumer3030
    @rajkumer3030 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    Mr. Ranganathan well said. You have voiced most of our concerns.

  • @RaghavanA-ev2jx
    @RaghavanA-ev2jx หลายเดือนก่อน +112

    Anand Ranganathan is a. Precious jewel. May he grow and grow in stature. With best wishes.

    • @ramachandrannair4554
      @ramachandrannair4554 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      We have sai deepak and Pushpendra Kulshrestha few. Question legality.

    • @anandpanchbhavi
      @anandpanchbhavi 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@ramachandrannair4554not to forget Sudhanshu

  • @jayagunalentirumalai9627
    @jayagunalentirumalai9627 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Dr.Anand Renganathan is absolutely correct.

  • @Luckypradhan123
    @Luckypradhan123 หลายเดือนก่อน +213

    Dr Anand Ranganatha🔥

    • @radhakrishnanunnithan4542
      @radhakrishnanunnithan4542 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Anand Renganathan sir the real hindu. ♥️♥️♥️

    • @Neeta7878
      @Neeta7878 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Please give a history of WAQF board? Why? What? How? International view also.

    • @savethenation5242
      @savethenation5242 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@radhakrishnanunnithan4542
      Is it talking against other means real Hindu. It looks very immature

    • @radhakrishnanunnithan4542
      @radhakrishnanunnithan4542 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@savethenation5242 No I mean it. His debate is always in good sence. Sai deepak also the same.
      See Modiji doing his best, but in reality hindu still in coma.

    • @user-kw4cy9mt8u
      @user-kw4cy9mt8u 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Hindus in Tamil Nadu need to wake up and identify ugly face of the party Mr.Saravanan belongs to.

  • @Skumardev
    @Skumardev หลายเดือนก่อน +56

    Yesterday.......i was watching Parliament Debate on Waqf Bill.........the entire Opposition was against it and they are at the Muslims side !
    Where as BJP still keep on sayihg the slogan sabka saath.... Sabka Vikas ! Now who will take Hindus legitimate side in Hindustan...??

    • @sourabhmore2197
      @sourabhmore2197 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Now modi has added sabka vishwas..😂 height of mental retardation by bjp.

    • @hiraljoshi3608
      @hiraljoshi3608 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Very sad reality 😔

    • @KavitaG80
      @KavitaG80 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      No one.. Hindus themselves are to blame! We are so easily manipulated into caste and division!
      First all Hindus rise up and protest against reservation based on caste?
      Replace reservation with "Grants" should be based on economic status of the family which will include everyone regardless of religion?
      Grants should be only on education.
      Full Grant and half Grant.
      For the most poor families, lit should extend to graduation.
      This way there is no compromise on merit.
      Even the brightest of employees in India lack reasoning/creativity/ communication/logic skills. How do you expect to become a superpower when majority of your employees come through reservation which is half baked on merit.
      Its a popular political tool, but it denigrates the individual as well as the nation.
      Doing away with reservation and replacing with a better financial package will abolish this caste politics as well as create casteless society.
      The Grant scheme should be given to only 2 children max per family. All educational and living costs upto the age of graduation should be paid for. No grants will be available fir 3rd or beyond.
      You kill 2 birds with one stone. Population control and reservation.

    • @jaypandya9661
      @jaypandya9661 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It is very good that muslims are treated lovingly by congress. But congress acts show hatred for hindus making them inconsequential and at Supreme disadvantage with great conspiracy, lest I say.

  • @user-gj2fx4ti3g
    @user-gj2fx4ti3g หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    Well said Dr Anand Ranganathan ban Waqf act

  • @manoharahuja3145
    @manoharahuja3145 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    all oppostion properties should give to waqf board

    • @K.Vee.Shanker
      @K.Vee.Shanker 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Why only for Waquf board? Why not that be proportionally donated to all Religious Boards?

  • @manoharahuja3145
    @manoharahuja3145 หลายเดือนก่อน +158

    Dmk is waste party

    • @lingammunuswamy7778
      @lingammunuswamy7778 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Its not a waste party...its a party of sewage....it smells shit

    • @VermaRajinder
      @VermaRajinder หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      But it is Power ????

    • @thotasaitejapatel
      @thotasaitejapatel หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      Their whole village in tamilnadu goes to waqf the dmk is shut thier ass and sit down

    • @IndhiyaThamizhan
      @IndhiyaThamizhan หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Hazardous waste

    • @donappamaagalappagari4907
      @donappamaagalappagari4907 หลายเดือนก่อน

      DMK party aims create the problems for Tamilnadu people who are voted for them.

  • @Goodwill345
    @Goodwill345 หลายเดือนก่อน +81

    Abolish Wakf,

  • @SCR6268
    @SCR6268 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +9

    WAFQ should be abolished completely

  • @srinuvasu7411
    @srinuvasu7411 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Abrogation of waqf board should be done immediately.....as India is a secular country and all religions are same...

  • @pankajthakar6472
    @pankajthakar6472 หลายเดือนก่อน +102

    Why not equal laws for Indian Citizens.

    • @Butterfly-ct5iq
      @Butterfly-ct5iq หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Because our constitution devides citizens on the basis of religion, cast and gender.

    • @Butterfly-ct5iq
      @Butterfly-ct5iq หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because, our constitution devides people on the basis of religion, cast and gender.

    • @user-ki5ki7jw4i
      @user-ki5ki7jw4i หลายเดือนก่อน

      Secularism means pleasing jihadis

    • @ajithchandran7402
      @ajithchandran7402 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Islam are not indian they are turkas

    • @fortechsupport5445
      @fortechsupport5445 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Butterfly-ct5iq THE GOVT MUST REFORM THE CONSTITUTION

  • @sanboklyngkhoi7074
    @sanboklyngkhoi7074 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    It should be ban

  • @harshildhaduk3766
    @harshildhaduk3766 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    How can a waqf board has 3rd largest property after defence and railway?
    If any one can answer this simple question?
    Especially hindus should answer this question.

    • @Anonymous-male
      @Anonymous-male หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Correction: Hindus supporting I.N.D.I Alliance

    • @meenasathyamurthy84
      @meenasathyamurthy84 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Saravanan should answer this question

    • @Shiva...6853
      @Shiva...6853 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      Waqf board land in India is bigger than the total area of the pakistan....This is so alarming...

    • @pragasanarchary2980
      @pragasanarchary2980 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      all the stupid hindus should answer

    • @VijayM-oo5uf
      @VijayM-oo5uf 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      In last 12+ years, WAQF property had doubled through claiming the properties as WQAF properties...

  • @VermaRajinder
    @VermaRajinder หลายเดือนก่อน +109

    The Wakf Property Act is like Stupidity in a Sovereign Nation !!!

    • @rddelta1606
      @rddelta1606 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are sleeper cells and it's roots connected to radical islamic across globe.....so in future they do land grab and convert everything to islamic land.

  • @user-jr6hi7bf5b
    @user-jr6hi7bf5b หลายเดือนก่อน +312

    Waqf board should be baned..

    • @ethanhunt937
      @ethanhunt937 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Banning the law will make them go unchecked. Amending it will give the government control over financial trails, properties etc. I am assuming they will go to the court to ban the law because this will suit them

    • @l_Jayk_l
      @l_Jayk_l หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      board should stay and waqf act should go.

    • @krishmenon1321
      @krishmenon1321 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Islam too should be banned.... na rahega baans na bajegi basuri !

    • @raghavendrasarma4755
      @raghavendrasarma4755 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​ 1:51

    • @raghavendrasarma4755
      @raghavendrasarma4755 หลายเดือนก่อน

  • @Raghuprasad1967
    @Raghuprasad1967 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Then WAQF tribunal has to be dissolved and the cases should be trailed in civil courts.

  • @mudukkurfarms3376
    @mudukkurfarms3376 หลายเดือนก่อน +132

    Mr Saravanan does not know the Muslims got these lands as gift from invaders after conversion

    • @mackmaharana813
      @mackmaharana813 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes...and the 1700 year old temple also your ancestors created....Islam came 1500 year ago..they time travelled 200 years back and gifted a Hindu temple to Allah...
      Nice.....sala ch******a

    • @romihbk
      @romihbk หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yes !!! You and Your family land should be donated to waqf board !!!

    • @PRAZKRIZ
      @PRAZKRIZ หลายเดือนก่อน

      dmk sell their sisters n mom for vote winning so they will do anyrthing to vote drug mafia katchi

    • @mathaveuplands4395
      @mathaveuplands4395 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      ​@@romihbkWhen Yogi comes, this act will be abrogated! That's it!

    • @chaitanyasabharwal72003
      @chaitanyasabharwal72003 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I think Saravanan is a small school boy trying to divert the question that was asked by the teacher.
      Damn you Saravanan.

  • @gajendrakn5589
    @gajendrakn5589 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

    Sarvanan you are the biggest joker i have ever seen 😂

    • @romihbk
      @romihbk หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes !!! You and Your family land should be donated to waqf board !!!

    • @sanjaykulkarni9066
      @sanjaykulkarni9066 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      He is trying to please his madam kanimozhi. His madam s voice (HMV)

    • @drsethuraman180
      @drsethuraman180 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Hypocrite s.

  • @manoharahuja3145
    @manoharahuja3145 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    all wafq board properties should be attach by modi govt and supreme court

  • @anjinappak2224
    @anjinappak2224 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    What was the necessity for treacherous congress party to enact Waqf board law on the basis of religion which is against the constitution in 1995. Why no such laws to other minorities like Jains, Sikhs, crichians, parsis. These opposition parties are agitating for VOTE bank politics just to oppose MODI. NO CONCERN for other minorities.Shame 😅😅😅😅😅

    • @ayushdhingra3903
      @ayushdhingra3903 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It was implement ed by chacha nehru... In 1955.

  • @perambu3441
    @perambu3441 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    The Wakf Board is the third largest landowner in India. Let us know how they got so much property. During the partition of India and Pakistan in 1947, Hindus who migrated to India from Pakistan had their properties in Pakistan seized by the Muslims and the Pakistani government. But the properties of Muslims who moved from India to Pakistan were given to Waqf Boards by the Indian government. Subsequently, in 1954, the Waqf Board Act was enacted. This means that the Government of India has given its own properties to the Islamic Waqf Board but not the same amount of properties to other religious denominations in India. As a solution, the Indian government should give equal property to Hindu, Christian, Buddhist, Jain and Sikh sects or take back the property from the Waqf Board.

    • @cutemrudula
      @cutemrudula 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      How idiotic is that? Why should one particular religion is given so much of power in the form of real estate.. and they call Hindu as ‘ intolerant’ 😡

    • @jaypandya9661
      @jaypandya9661 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Totally agree and very well said.

  • @manoharahuja3145
    @manoharahuja3145 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

    Sarvanan is joker

    • @lingammunuswamy7778
      @lingammunuswamy7778 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sorry i dont agree...a joker has value...this fool is an absolute low breed moron

    • @romihbk
      @romihbk หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes !!! You and Your family land should be donated to waqf board !!!

    • @kamalkantsharma9588
      @kamalkantsharma9588 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes.

    • @ramkumar-zz5sw
      @ramkumar-zz5sw 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      nope he is an asssss holeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

  • @indiafirst-secularindian8917
    @indiafirst-secularindian8917 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    The Waqf Act should go!

  • @bharathgc8206
    @bharathgc8206 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Waqf board should be abrogated.

  • @donappamaagalappagari4907
    @donappamaagalappagari4907 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Ban Waqf board
    I completely agree with Anand sir

  • @perambu3441
    @perambu3441 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    We need to understand what is the subtlety in the 1995 Waqf Act. Section 3 of the Wakf Act, 1995 allows the Wakf Board to claim property only on its "opinion" without any evidence. If the Wakf Board claims a property, the real owner of the property cannot go to court rather he has to approach the court of Wakf Tribunal. For example, your enemy enters your house and abducts your wife but you cannot stop it and the police department and court will not help you instead you have to appeal to your enemy's accomplices to release your wife.
    The Waqf Act has now been reformed to correct such abuse of law.

  • @aravindr0001
    @aravindr0001 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    So who donated the whole village in Tamil Nadu? I can't believe this kind of nonsense ever happens anywhere else.

  • @sarathraja4955
    @sarathraja4955 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Anand renganathan sir is correct

  • @raghuveerdendukuri1762
    @raghuveerdendukuri1762 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Waqf board's powers to be minimized. Abrogation is best move though. Agree with Dr.Anand perspective

  • @arimsamyable
    @arimsamyable หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Saravanan's explanation about the temples is out. The state is violating the HR&CE act. Numerous advocates have explained it.

  • @user-iw9xn1im9e
    @user-iw9xn1im9e หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Anand Sir, everybody understands what you said
    But the sad part is The Waqf Act IS NOT GOING
    😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢

    • @NehaRathore-e9r
      @NehaRathore-e9r 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It has to go. We all need to raise our voices or be ready for ours lands to be captured. Unfortunately, our Muslim brothers don’t have very good intentions for the country India they live in.

    • @user-iw9xn1im9e
      @user-iw9xn1im9e 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@NehaRathore-e9r
      Please note, Muslims living in our country are not at all our brothers or sisters

    • @NehaRathore-e9r
      @NehaRathore-e9r 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@user-iw9xn1im9e of course. It was sarcastic.

    • @atifalam1573
      @atifalam1573 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@NehaRathore-e9rkuch bhi why you people don’t think about our country development You get caught in the trap of hindu muslim topic lv jihaal land jihaad food jihaad car jihaad animal jihaad kuch bhi 😂🤣🤣🤣

    • @atifalam1573
      @atifalam1573 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@user-iw9xn1im9e chal be it cell waale 😂🤣

  • @manoharahuja3145
    @manoharahuja3145 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    all oppostion are involved in waqf board

  • @arclightz11
    @arclightz11 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Saravanan is so dumb but shouts to make his presence felt

    • @romihbk
      @romihbk หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes !!! You and Your family land should be donated to waqf board !!!

    • @IndhiyaThamizhan
      @IndhiyaThamizhan หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Trademark of all dmk spokespersons

    • @meenasathyamurthy84
      @meenasathyamurthy84 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @26devidev
    @26devidev หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Govt. should have abrogated waqf act when they had absolute majority. This act should go. This is a danger to India. Why is the govt. so apologetic and scared.

    • @Muslim000-v6c
      @Muslim000-v6c หลายเดือนก่อน

      This waqf land belongs only to muslim because this land was given by muslim in charity to islam

    • @PartheevSaiBoddeda-u4o
      @PartheevSaiBoddeda-u4o หลายเดือนก่อน

      Surprisingly no one is challening this act in supreme court including dso called great lawyers

    • @26devidev
      @26devidev หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@PartheevSaiBoddeda-u4o Ashwini Upadyay and Vishnu Jain already submitted PILs against waqf in SC but we all know how SC or these Me lords are anti Hindu.

    • @dns9833
      @dns9833 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@PartheevSaiBoddeda-u4o ashwini upadhyay has filed a PIL in supreme court i guess ..
      But supreme court is also afraid of these radicals maybe
      ...they rejected the pil

  • @vggops2010
    @vggops2010 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    why melting point Saravanan is either blabbering or bluffing. if a temple like in Nanganallur built in the last few decades not by any king is taken over by HR &CE ?

    • @user-kh2kf1be9m
      @user-kh2kf1be9m หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Any Hindu local crowed temples are taken over by hrnc board (Guess Saravana has selective amnesia)

  • @ravindrabh2664
    @ravindrabh2664 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    ranga should have been a law minister in BJP government

  • @vladimirp5260
    @vladimirp5260 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The amendments are nothing but an eyewash. How can you amend a law that is unconstitutional? As Dr Ranganathan said this Wakf act should be abrogated, period. Can't understand why central government is going through all these confusions. Just abolish this unconstitutional act. If Wakf is essential for Muslims then constitute a Sanatan board for Hindus with equal rights...

  • @geetachhabra3115
    @geetachhabra3115 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Dr A Ranganathan is explaining logically. He is clear about the facts.

  • @NeutralSay
    @NeutralSay หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    Remove waqf board entirely as such boards are not available for other religions in India. Make uniform for all beliefs. The Congress party and other INDI Alliance are on the path of destroying other religion and beliefs just for vote bank politics for particular religion. Why no such boards are available in Pakistan and Bangladesh for minorities?

    • @meenasathyamurthy84
      @meenasathyamurthy84 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Then indi alliance can go to Bangladesh and Pakistan for their politics

  • @mudukkurfarms3376
    @mudukkurfarms3376 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Let me Saravanan explain why crypto christians are in HRnCE?

    • @rsv6603
      @rsv6603 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Only a person who has not seen DDLJ movie can ask such a question.

  • @sundaramr1424
    @sundaramr1424 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Sir why you call saravanan? Not fit for debate

  • @pradeepkumaru4481
    @pradeepkumaru4481 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    India is secular since 1947...Again became secular in 1976. So, in a secular country, Y there is parallel lae for minorities? Y there is Y WAQF Board? It should be removed.. Implement Article 44 immediately...

  • @kaushaldesai7674
    @kaushaldesai7674 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    Yes waqaf law should be abrogated if not possible make similar law for hindus & declare country as Hindu rashtra.

  • @mrdrnaveenrov
    @mrdrnaveenrov หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Law must be equal for every person religion

  • @padmavathyj986
    @padmavathyj986 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    WAFQ Act should be abolished

  • @vishwanathparulekar.8859
    @vishwanathparulekar.8859 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    All this while when there was a parallel court working in the country for the welfare of a particular community, I fail to understand what is our supreme judiciary been doing all this while playing second fiddle to such a draconian law under its nose enacted for political appeasement?

    • @mrinalojha5286
      @mrinalojha5286 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      U r right. But wat was the central government doing for 10 yrs when they had a full majority.

  • @SureshKumar-br9ui
    @SureshKumar-br9ui หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Waqf act was made in 1923. Then how come 1500 yrs old temple comes under waqf. These people like Saravanan will only shout. Worst attitude

  • @murthyannamalai9247
    @murthyannamalai9247 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    All the opposition parties donate your property to WAQF board change your name and join them who is stopping.

  • @kashyapsandeep9986
    @kashyapsandeep9986 หลายเดือนก่อน +70

    Saravanan is a joker

    • @VermaRajinder
      @VermaRajinder หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Only ??? He appears to be a Child born of a Lot,,, a Lot of Jumping Pumping and Humping from where he comes ---- Sad !!! 😢😢😢

    • @romihbk
      @romihbk หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And Your land should be donated to waqf board !!!

    • @adilsheikh9916
      @adilsheikh9916 หลายเดือนก่อน

      he is total stupid

  • @AN-bj1eg
    @AN-bj1eg หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    If govt. Waqf board Do not abrogate then ..Hindu board Bano do ....

  • @agni2k4
    @agni2k4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Waqf should be abolished at once.

  • @parasram9373
    @parasram9373 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The act should be totally demolished

  • @sundaramr1424
    @sundaramr1424 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Guy saravanan blabering something He knows nothing about subject

    • @romihbk
      @romihbk หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes !!! You and Your family land should be donated to waqf board !!!

  • @kamalkishore3339
    @kamalkishore3339 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Scrap this act one for all Jai hind...!!!

  • @narendramarkale7908
    @narendramarkale7908 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Sarvanan is a mad person. He says temples were built by kings out of revenue collected from people all right but kings were devout Hindus. Are the DMK' s Stalin ,his son or for that matter their founder Karunanidhi believers in Hindu religion ? In fact they opposed the very tenets of Hinduism & talk of it as dengue, malaria & are talking of its demolition. How the Hindu temples are safe in the hands of such notorious persons?

  • @mch3644
    @mch3644 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    ನಾನು ಸಂಪೂರ್ಣವಾಗಿ ಆನಂದ್ ರಂಗನಾಥ್ ಅವರನ್ನ ಸಪೋರ್ಟ್ ಮಾಡುತ್ತಿನ್ನೇ. 🔥🔥🔥🔥

  • @mathaveuplands4395
    @mathaveuplands4395 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Hope Yogiji willabrogate Waqf board Act! Modiji is just not bold enough!

  • @mythgamerr
    @mythgamerr หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    respect you Ranganathan Sir, completely agree with your statement, WAFF needs to go, not to be nerfed but scrapped and thrown in the dustbin!!!

  • @PartheevSaiBoddeda-u4o
    @PartheevSaiBoddeda-u4o หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Why can't Dr. Rangabathan file a PIL in SC to dismiss the wakf act? Everyone participating in debates but not challenging in courts... This is strange 😔😔

  • @sanjaykulkarni9066
    @sanjaykulkarni9066 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Dr Ranganath revealed harsh realities.

  • @chakravarthivrangarajan9616
    @chakravarthivrangarajan9616 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Extension of corrupt Congress practices plus Muslim appeasement = Wakf Act

  • @Vinaykr.Attelli
    @Vinaykr.Attelli 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Entire Waqf Act has to be removed

  • @rishabhverma8159
    @rishabhverma8159 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    🔥🔥 A. Ranganatha VS Owaisi 🔥🔥

  • @sameersingh3705
    @sameersingh3705 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It has to be removed.. Nothing against religion.. But this has to go. Period

  • @user-nl9kg8cl6m
    @user-nl9kg8cl6m หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Can hindhu ask their rights in Islam countries?

  • @debabr
    @debabr หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    why this Act needs to be there! No other community is having this special privilege.....

  • @VictimHood-qv1hx
    @VictimHood-qv1hx หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Distribute wafq properties amongst Hindu refugees fleeing Pakistan and bengaldesh

  • @srinivasanrajagopalan546
    @srinivasanrajagopalan546 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Anand Ramganathan is brilliant. He shatters the opponents. Powerful presentation of absolute truth.
    Salutations to the giant

  • @krishnadasan-ck4bs
    @krishnadasan-ck4bs หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Best solution is bring deveswam board act which empower to claim any property without any proof as deveswam property. What these opposition parties will say

    • @VikashKumar-kw5ck
      @VikashKumar-kw5ck 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼

  • @user-fy3xj4yz3f
    @user-fy3xj4yz3f หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What kind of democracy we are !

  • @crabman3722
    @crabman3722 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Saravanan just fucking cites the Waqf act verbatim as if he's come up with some profound response to Mr. Ranganathan.😂 What a bloody joker.

  • @ddchow61
    @ddchow61 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Waqf board should be abrogated immediately.

  • @akashrastogi95
    @akashrastogi95 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Puri duniya me ye qaum dusro k lie sir dard bani hui hai.

  • @mohan4047
    @mohan4047 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I agree with Ranganathan. Why have wakf act at all ? Muslims can form Societies or Trusts to take care of their properties and the properties should be subject to the normal law of the land.

  • @ethanhunt937
    @ethanhunt937 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Banning the law will make them go unchecked. Anyways even after banning the law, they still can donate in Waqf and this will go unchecked, do anything without the eyes of the government. Amending it will give the government control over financial trails, properties etc. I am assuming they will go to the court to ban the law because this will suit them

  • @Goodwill345
    @Goodwill345 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yes, Hindus need a new board , Hakf board, with the same rights as Wakf

  • @Vinodkumar-gy6ok
    @Vinodkumar-gy6ok หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Wakf board should be fully banned as Dr. Ranganathan suggests

  • @PartheevSaiBoddeda-u4o
    @PartheevSaiBoddeda-u4o หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Modi govt should introduce such kind of bills as same as abolition of Article 370 bill. They should not tell anyone until present in the Parliament then the bill will pass easily without so much non sense.

  • @dhydro-gun.5048
    @dhydro-gun.5048 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    1921-mopla 10000+ Hindus
    1946-noakhali 10000+ Hindus
    1971-Bangladesh 2500000+ Hindus
    1990-Kashmir 30000+ Hindus
    2002-Godhra 3000+ Hindus
    Muzafarnagar+Baghalpur+Etc+ Upcoming

  • @ramanbhasin7839
    @ramanbhasin7839 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I 100% agree it should be withdrawn

  • @shivajipawar8042
    @shivajipawar8042 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Mr.ANAND RANGANATHAN is one of the best brilliant personality . we love to listen and watch his always.

  • @sureshkabadagi2252
    @sureshkabadagi2252 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why seperate court in wqf
    How can they run alternative govt.
    They must go to Constitutional courts for any dispute
    Why and how cum they can decide matter of land which is ultimately belongs to nation

  • @mamtatomar5086
    @mamtatomar5086 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent point raised by Dr. Ranganathan

  • @kumarkrishnan2327
    @kumarkrishnan2327 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you Shri Dr Ranganath 🙏

  • @7777siddharth
    @7777siddharth หลายเดือนก่อน

    That's why i love so much Anand Sir.🙏👍

  • @sriramdasarathi4124
    @sriramdasarathi4124 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Absolutely right, the Waqf act has to aborgated

  • @vipinbhandare4u
    @vipinbhandare4u หลายเดือนก่อน

    Let's stand against it.

  • @florineroche4702
    @florineroche4702 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Did I hear someone saying wakf property is donated by Muslims. What about lands donated by Manmohan singh in Delhi alone 123 properties . Hindus were sleeping all along

  • @dineshmohanlal5697
    @dineshmohanlal5697 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    77% of Delhi acquired by Waqf Board through Donations. Were there any Legal Transfer Documents? Was Donation Tax paid to the State Reeceiver of Revenue? Was Transfer and Registration costs paid by the Doner or Waqf Board?
    Moreover, were there any limitations on donations and ownership of land by that religious entity (Waqf Board)?
    Why was 77% of Delhi Land not left in the Real Estate Market, open for Purchase by the general public?
    The whoe issue about the Waqf aBoards ownership of donated land STINKS OF CORRUPTION and ROT and should be thoroughly investigated!
    The indigenous Hindus native to Bharat/India should not be deprived of what's theirs and be made to suffer at the hands of any foreign religious community (including their presesnt day decendants) not naturally native to Bharath/India.

  • @VJ38
    @VJ38 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    There is no logic to justify the existence of a wakf act only for one religion or for no religion. Fully agree the Act has to be abrogated.

  • @user-bj7wq1vj1w
    @user-bj7wq1vj1w 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Mr Ranganathan should be nominated as member of Rajya Sabha.

  • @aravindr0001
    @aravindr0001 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What kind of secularism is this to give such nonsensical powers to one religious group!! Congress has caused such nonsense, when will others wake up.

  • @rahulrao5349
    @rahulrao5349 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you

  • @himeshsinghshishodiya
    @himeshsinghshishodiya หลายเดือนก่อน

    1:27 Finally. Thank you Dr. Ranganathan!

  • @tentenzin9557
    @tentenzin9557 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bias Waqf act should not exist in secular India

  • @phuletushar
    @phuletushar หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Reform is not enough..abrogate the Act and save HINDUSTAN