Who decides how long a second is? - John Kitching

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ม.ค. 2021
  • Discover how scientists developed atomic clocks, which use the vibrations of atoms to measure and maintain a globally consistent time.
    --
    In 1967, researchers gathered to answer a long-running scientific question: just how long is a second? It might seem obvious at first. A second is the tick of a clock, the swing of a pendulum, the time it takes to count to one. But how precise are those measurements? And what is that length based on? John Kitching digs into how we scientifically define this fundamental unit of time.
    Lesson by John Kitching, directed by Tjoff Koong.
    Support Our Non-Profit Mission
    ----------------------------------------------
    Support us on Patreon: bit.ly/TEDEdPatreon
    Check out our merch: bit.ly/TEDEDShop
    ----------------------------------------------
    Connect With Us
    ----------------------------------------------
    Sign up for our newsletter: bit.ly/TEDEdNewsletter
    Follow us on Facebook: bit.ly/TEDEdFacebook
    Find us on Twitter: bit.ly/TEDEdTwitter
    Peep us on Instagram: bit.ly/TEDEdInstagram
    ----------------------------------------------
    Keep Learning
    ----------------------------------------------
    View full lesson: ed.ted.com/lessons/who-decide...
    Dig deeper with additional resources: ed.ted.com/lessons/who-decide...
    Animator's website: greenhouseanimation.com/direct...
    ----------------------------------------------
    Thank you so much to our patrons for your support! Without you this video would not be possible! Po Foon Kwong, NinjaBoffin, Jesse Jurman, Josue Perez Miranda, Scott Markley, Elija Peterson, Ovidiu Mrd, Lawrence Wu, Xavier Dupont, Aravind Battaje, Nathan Giusti, Helen Lee, Anthony Benedict, Karthik Balsubramanian, John Hong, Annastasshia Ames, Sebastiaan Hols, Aries SW, Amy Lopez, Liz Candee, Kathryn Vacha, Anthony Arcis, Jeffrey Segrest, Karmi Nguyen, Yelena Baykova, Harshita Jagdish Sahijwani, Nick Johnson, Carlos H. Costa, Mohamed Elsayed, Les Howard, Jennifer Kurkoski, Ryan B Harvey, Abhishek Bansal, Jose Arcadio Valdes Franco, Karl Laius, JY Kang, Charles A Hershberger, Robert Seik, Heidi Stolt, Alexis Hevia, Brady Jones, Christina Salvatore, Karlee Finch, Michael Goldberg, Mario Mejia, Nicolas Silva, Kurt Almendras, Denise A Pitts, Doug Henry and Kristiyan Bonev.

ความคิดเห็น • 1.7K

  • @abbyf1183
    @abbyf1183 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10114

    This is what Ted-Ed is for: answering random questions you’ve always wondered about.

    • @TheIndieGhost
      @TheIndieGhost 3 ปีที่แล้ว +315

      its for answering random questions i've never wondered about until they've asked it and I think "huh, that's a good question"

    • @ilickcatnip
      @ilickcatnip 3 ปีที่แล้ว +77

      Or rather, it's for : answering the questions we don't find answers to in schools because they are 'not quite important'

    • @ishworshrestha3559
      @ishworshrestha3559 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      So why do we need to measure such small chunk of time we will almost neglect it in most part of physics??
      I mean since theta is very small sin(theta) = theta to derive pendulum time period...Huh??
      Well maybe because of some specific cases like GPS when neglecting difference of arrival of small unit of time can give us inaccurate data of where person is located by factor of thousand miles I guess...
      😅😅

    • @ashutoshmahapatra537
      @ashutoshmahapatra537 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@ishworshrestha3559 Also that sin theta= theta thing is mostly used for exams and theory I guess, while when they are really dealing with real life problems I think they must be using actual value instead most of the time.

    • @anadraguleanu8710
      @anadraguleanu8710 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Agreed!

  • @Kenjinu
    @Kenjinu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3355

    The only person who decides how long Is a second is our parents counting down from 10 to clean our rooms

    • @priyanshudutta9463
      @priyanshudutta9463 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      Underrated comment 😂😂

    • @skibur848
      @skibur848 3 ปีที่แล้ว +124

      So when it hits 2 everything slows down

    • @yourtrashcan7
      @yourtrashcan7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      definitely 😂

    • @feero9680
      @feero9680 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      True af

    • @lilypads3033
      @lilypads3033 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@skibur848 Parents: ZA WARUDO

  • @XEinstein
    @XEinstein 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1103

    As an engineer I wonder: how the heck did engineers in the sixties make a device that apparently was able to count something more than 9 billion times in one second. 🤯

    • @joelm4887
      @joelm4887 3 ปีที่แล้ว +79

      Yes, I'd still like to know how it's done now.

    • @whi2gan
      @whi2gan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      SAME

    • @brudamonas8208
      @brudamonas8208 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      @@abiryaakovalmoznino3395 computers don’t think for us, they do work instead of us

    • @Ausea33
      @Ausea33 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      @@abiryaakovalmoznino3395 Yes they can crunch numbers that would otherwise take far far too long for a human to replicate

    • @Ausea33
      @Ausea33 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@abiryaakovalmoznino3395 Wait I think I misunderstand your position here. I'm not saying that's all computers can do, but they can assist humans with doing work that is otherwise too tedious or impossible within a reasonable time frame. Obviously they can do more than crunch numbers.

  • @beactivebehappy9894
    @beactivebehappy9894 3 ปีที่แล้ว +150

    This is how I want everything to be taught in schools. Not the other way around. Like telling first, we have Cs-atomic clocks and then justifying it.
    "The best explanations of human phenomena lie in story-telling and not justifications." - me

    • @veen88
      @veen88 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That's brilliant quote 👍

    • @davidsevic8317
      @davidsevic8317 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@veen88 you really quoted yourself

    • @Jordan-oy3bg
      @Jordan-oy3bg หลายเดือนก่อน

      You should be a professional quote maker

  • @glorysky1998
    @glorysky1998 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3454

    "Who decides how long a second is?"
    Me: Mississippi.

    • @TheIndieGhost
      @TheIndieGhost 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      i see

    • @zyansheep
      @zyansheep 3 ปีที่แล้ว +139

      1 Mississippi 2 Mississippi 3 Mississippi...

    • @cibinthomas4007
      @cibinthomas4007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +104

      Ross after reading this:
      *I'm fine*

    • @dontspikemydrink9382
      @dontspikemydrink9382 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      @Grzegorz Dziedzic what

    • @shalevasor911
      @shalevasor911 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      @Grzegorz Dziedzic what

  • @ead630
    @ead630 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1567

    *Why does this channel know the questions I want to ask before I ask them?*

    • @blueeye2281
      @blueeye2281 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      Because the one who makes this videos already asked themselves in their childhood.

    • @hindifabulousstories9817
      @hindifabulousstories9817 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      By thinking it all questions get begin
      *Thinking of a human being can create or destroy the world*
      *-Albert Einstein*

    • @vas2.1025
      @vas2.1025 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Haki.

    • @jbiliHacker
      @jbiliHacker 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vas2.1025 hahaha

    • @feero9680
      @feero9680 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Have u asked them a topic before

  • @essee3984
    @essee3984 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    The Mahabharat written in 400 BCE defines the smallest unit of time as the wink of an eye. Surya Siddhanta, the Sanskrit Text on Astronomy written a century later clearly defines the smallest units of time from 1 breath (inhale-exhale of 4 sec) to hour,days,months,year,century. Quite fascinating.

  • @brianking2365
    @brianking2365 2 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    These videos are incredible. The animation and narration, plus the way the science is distilled and easier to understand makes these such a valuable resource.

  • @omarhanif9101
    @omarhanif9101 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1751

    It's strange to think that something so obvious like a second wasn't even a thing years ago. It makes me wonder...

    • @patrickbueno3279
      @patrickbueno3279 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      yeah it is strange but not really as out of the blue. We have the same problem with economy, evolving throughout the time on what we think is useful to us.

    • @chandramohan_sonder
      @chandramohan_sonder 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      Second has been a thing for a long time, it's the precise definition that we lacked. As pointed in the video, they used the formal definition of the second, you know 365.25x24x60x60, to arrive at a reference that's agreed and replicable all over the world. We didn't use the ticking of Cesium electrons to define second, we used the already existing definition of a second to find out how many ticks the Cesium electron makes.

    • @GuiiBrazil
      @GuiiBrazil 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      while watching the video I was thinking, from where and when comes the "It will take only a second."?

    • @hamadhamdi188
      @hamadhamdi188 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Honestly, we should stop using our planets version of a second for scientific research. It works adequately enough while humans only colonize Earth, but what are we going to use once humans are living on multiple planets, or even beyond this solar system. Our version of a year/day/hour/minute/and second would seem ridiculous to others not born on Earth, since our measurements of time are based on our planets orbit and rotation around the sun. Future planets colonized by humans would find it difficult to learn and remember, especially if their time measurements are not comparable to ours. I think we should define a universal timescale based off a constant that doesn't favor one planet over another. Perhaps use the time it takes light to travel 100,000,000 meters as a new universal second (almost 1/3 of our current second). That way it will be the same no matter what timescale measurements future planets use, and we can set it to a metric system of base 10 for easier calculations. We will all have a common, accurate measurement to share future research with one another.

    • @ROCKSTAR123456789110
      @ROCKSTAR123456789110 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Hamad Hamdi nah, let em figure it out when they decide to change planets.

  • @mala967
    @mala967 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1462

    This is the definition of “I don’t need sleep I need answers”

    • @drkshadw01
      @drkshadw01 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      oh you sheldon fan !

    • @enby_dreamsss
      @enby_dreamsss 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ironic...
      I should be asleep

    • @stef511
      @stef511 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah lol it's like half past twelve in the morning but I'm watching this

    • @mala967
      @mala967 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@stef511 it’s 3 am and I just read your comment

    • @e.knutsson
      @e.knutsson 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mala967 I read this at exactly 02:59 am

  • @AnkitYadav-il2fo
    @AnkitYadav-il2fo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow, what a work this channel is doing, I am so emotional by it's work. I would like to give a special thank to them for spreading free knowledge to us. Thank you so much

  • @neonWHALE002
    @neonWHALE002 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I love these videos, they are simultaneously educational and relaxing; it is certain that they will either teach me something or send me to sleep, depending on which I need more at the time.

  • @gajendrasonare
    @gajendrasonare 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2157

    Fun fact: second is called second because it is second division of an hour. i.e
    1second = ((1/60)/60) hour

    • @cardamundo295
      @cardamundo295 3 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      Brilliant fact!

    • @mung_pi
      @mung_pi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +256

      @@mrafi7166 ...it's minute compared to a day?

    • @aryanbhatia1729
      @aryanbhatia1729 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      @@mung_pi lmao

    • @vedants.vispute77
      @vedants.vispute77 3 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      @@mrafi7166 Everything is made up of minute particles. Every hour is made up of minutes.

    • @Gabboele
      @Gabboele 3 ปีที่แล้ว +129

      @@mrafi7166 the word "minute" comes from the Latin "pars minuta prima" , meaning "first small part"... in fact minutes are also called "primi" (firsts) in Italian, idk about English

  • @Mswordx23
    @Mswordx23 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1031

    "With precision that's _second_ to none." We all saw what you did there.

    • @jahjoeka
      @jahjoeka 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I didn't...

    • @pkyrohit
      @pkyrohit 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's what a good writing is..

  • @JustyRBLX
    @JustyRBLX 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    TED-Ed is the best. It answers all questions you've always wondered about, but never found an exact answer to it. Keep the good work, you help people!

  • @noyn9142
    @noyn9142 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This question has been on my mind for far too long. Now i finally have a SECOND to look it up

  • @captainvane104
    @captainvane104 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4867

    And later on we discovered - Every 60 seconds in Africa a minute passes.

  • @jjOnceAgain
    @jjOnceAgain 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1552

    The dislikes are from chemists who were rooting for a different element to be chosen

    • @adrees
      @adrees 3 ปีที่แล้ว +68

      Actually, Yterrbium or Lutetium are actually used to make the world’s most accurate atomic clock. This will allow for GPS to be accurate within 1 mm which has vast implications for self-driving cars and even store product stock locations.

    • @Micahsaurus
      @Micahsaurus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      What if I disliked this comment?😡

    • @jjOnceAgain
      @jjOnceAgain 3 ปีที่แล้ว +81

      @@Micahsaurus Then I'd keep on going with life

    • @Micahsaurus
      @Micahsaurus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lol

    • @smartart6841
      @smartart6841 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What if i liked this comment like i just did?!😄

  • @pathikdesai5853
    @pathikdesai5853 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This used to be my question as child. Thank you for answering. Ted Ed is a great initiative. Keep up the good work.

  • @uknownada
    @uknownada 3 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    I always wondered why such a seemingly random number was picked to define a second! But now I'm wondering how we were ever able to measure an atom's ticking, especially back in the 60's. This video gave me a rough idea about that, but how do those machines work? And how are you able to put a single atom inside? And how do we know if it works the way we think it does?

    • @farziltheweebo4841
      @farziltheweebo4841 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The answer is the most used word in physics "probably "

    • @uknownada
      @uknownada ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@farziltheweebo4841 Since I made this comment I did find out how the number was picked! It's because it approximately equalled 1/60 of 1/60 of 1/24 of a day. So just use it to redefine a second, and you're gold.
      Still not sure how they measure it, though.

  • @MeekOmni
    @MeekOmni 3 ปีที่แล้ว +112

    I like how the intro turns on the thinking machine in our head

  • @aname6984
    @aname6984 3 ปีที่แล้ว +541

    The animations are so good. The animator has done an incredible job.

    • @whiteboardanimatorhamna
      @whiteboardanimatorhamna 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Amazing job on animation always!

    • @astgfrallah771
      @astgfrallah771 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mashallah

    • @tomfooIeryz
      @tomfooIeryz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@astgfrallah771 Jesus died for your sins.

    • @attiamustafa8569
      @attiamustafa8569 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh pls be quiet 😒

    • @abbasshah-jr2uc
      @abbasshah-jr2uc 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tomfooIeryzReligion is one's choice. Respect it and accept it.

  • @gopalakrishnakolapalli1453
    @gopalakrishnakolapalli1453 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I never seen such a simple and effective explaination about measuring second.

  • @aworm
    @aworm 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The illustration and animation in this one are amazing

  • @SunniDae333
    @SunniDae333 3 ปีที่แล้ว +114

    TED-Ed asking the real questions.

  • @karelprochazka2709
    @karelprochazka2709 3 ปีที่แล้ว +432

    Last time I was this early, a second wasn’t properly defined

  • @frankydman
    @frankydman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    While it is fantastic that we have figured out how to standardize the second, what’s arguably just as mind blowing is the fact that even though we’ve figured out atomic clocks, it doesn’t change the fact that from a physics perspective, we can’t actually prove that time exists

    • @professorx3060
      @professorx3060 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Neither can you prove that it doesn't exist

    • @PneumothoraxBlueneck
      @PneumothoraxBlueneck ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Its subjective exist and not exist from different perspectives

    • @krlllx
      @krlllx 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@professorx3060 you cant prove anything doesnt exist with certainty

    • @MrVibriocholerae
      @MrVibriocholerae 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We have used time in billions of experiments without problems. That should be enough proof of its existance...

  • @aminawinterwater2915
    @aminawinterwater2915 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I learn so much by watching these videos! Thank you!

  • @rekhac12
    @rekhac12 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    The animation never fails to amaze me!

  • @leeangu7059
    @leeangu7059 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    I guess the same PERSON who decides " which AD can be skipped and which can't be! "

    • @GOD-LOK
      @GOD-LOK 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Smart answer and TRUE

  • @esmirspace4826
    @esmirspace4826 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sometimes I wonder how good schools could be if they incorporated TH-cam as a main source of teaching. So many bad teachers distracted me from learning in the past .If I could use my own mentors here,I would never be bored.There would be no pressure of bad grades,lame books,lame definitions and forced learning word by word...Learning should be fun,not strict...Same goes for testing...Appreciated the smart people that figured these things out ,and I'm thankful for pasionated educators who are so underrated and smart of course.

  • @space1607
    @space1607 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    At 3:35 TED-Ed said that there are 118 elements to choose from but back in 1967 (The time that the conference took place) there were only 105 discovered elements.

    • @psltmtir
      @psltmtir ปีที่แล้ว

      Perhaps it also included different isotopes of the same element, which explains why Caesium-133 is specified, and not just "Caesium."

  • @duckymomo7935
    @duckymomo7935 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    The definition of a second is defined in 1967, based on a measurement of the number of cycles of the radiation from a particular cesium-133 transition with reference to the second commonly used in civilian timekeeping, which at that time was based on astronomical observations.

    • @sweatycommenter
      @sweatycommenter ปีที่แล้ว

      it says it got measured in 1967 and created another definition for the second, acording to this it was already based on "a day/24/60/60" in late 1500s

  • @shirleygomes2004
    @shirleygomes2004 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Thank you Ted-Ed for teaching me so much. You've really made my 2020 knowledgeable. I look forward to watching all of your future videos.

  • @ZEEQ011
    @ZEEQ011 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    that is one of the most interesting knowledge i ever known and never have i thought of it. good job Ted-Ed

  • @fairarizkiano3845
    @fairarizkiano3845 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this narrator's voice is one of my favorite. thank you narrator!

  • @TristanSamuel
    @TristanSamuel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +222

    "Who decides how long a second is?"
    Uploaded 53 seconds ago
    *I don't understand*

  • @swetakumari4747
    @swetakumari4747 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Had read about it years agoin brief but didn't seep into mind , only knew that it's related to Cs atom , but now understood it fully . Very well explained.

  • @yesitsmojo24
    @yesitsmojo24 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    "Atomic clocks allow us to measure time with precision that is second to none"
    Oh my god, i love this channel

  • @maxdukhovskoy1406
    @maxdukhovskoy1406 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This channel answers questions that I never knew I wanted answered

  • @alvinpoly2781
    @alvinpoly2781 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Ted-ed always manages to make me watch videos on topics I've never given thought to but never really understood!

  • @miwochi
    @miwochi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +115

    I love how this video is about seconds, and it just appeared to me in seconds.

  • @zack7122
    @zack7122 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    once again the animations are perfection!!! they really accompany what's going on and allow you to understand things so much easier, thanks to all the ted team who put these vids together 🥺💕

  • @ayrusification
    @ayrusification 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ted Ed answers the questions I never knew I wanted answers for!!!!

  • @karthikkappagantu5885
    @karthikkappagantu5885 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I kinda love those quotes that they put at the beginning.

  • @johnsavard7583
    @johnsavard7583 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Another thing you missed: the length of the atomic second was indeed based on the length of the day... but the average length of the day between 1750 and 1892, as determined by Simon Newcomb. This was the basis for Ephemeris Time, a uniform scale of time based on the motions of the Earth and the other planets, and it was the second of Ephemeris Time, not 1/86,400 of the solar day in 1967, that was the basis for how many Cesium oscillations were in a second. That's why they needed leap seconds as soon as the switch to atomic time was made. And this, of course, is central to answering the question in the title.

  • @user-qx5cn1si1q
    @user-qx5cn1si1q 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is actually really impressive. I never even wondered about the topic, mad

  • @smamoden1523
    @smamoden1523 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have been wondering my whole life. thank you.

  • @andevm5922
    @andevm5922 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The Gregoria Calendar was made in the university of Salamanca, Spain. The British colonies started around XVII, a hundred years later.

    • @vultschlange
      @vultschlange 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Video said it was *spread* by the British, not invented by them.

  • @shirleygomes2004
    @shirleygomes2004 3 ปีที่แล้ว +327

    When Ted-Ed teaches you more than school.

    • @unlinedphoton7965
      @unlinedphoton7965 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      When Ted ed doesn't teach you more than school
      " Wait that's illegal"

    • @srijanumesh5355
      @srijanumesh5355 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I actually learnt this before. Arrest Ted Ed. It broke the law!

    • @greyheart3001
      @greyheart3001 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Always did

    • @nopenope8369
      @nopenope8369 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No it doesn't

    • @greyheart3001
      @greyheart3001 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@nopenope8369 You must study in a great school

  • @OXIR
    @OXIR 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was an amazing video and information. I never knew this historical decision. And I thought a second was decided for much earlier.

  • @sahilprasad8343
    @sahilprasad8343 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mann! The animation and the way of explanation are too good on this channel.
    am a student of 11th grade and these videos helps me a lot to understand some typical writing in HC VERMA book.

  • @michaelpuglisi1647
    @michaelpuglisi1647 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I didn’t know electrons orbited the nucleus of an atom. I was under the impression that instead of it being in orbit around an axis, the electrons existed as a cloud surrounding the nucleus.
    I also thought these seconds came from the ancient Sumerians who use the number 60 instead of 100 or 10 in their measurements. And the second represented a heartbeat.

    • @DoomFinger511
      @DoomFinger511 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It is a cloud, but it only appears that way because they move so fast. Just like how rain cloud is only a cloud when viewed far away but up close you can see every individual water particle in suspension.
      You are also right about the Sumerians however they never defined anything smaller then a day. The ancient Egyptians defined hours as 1/12 of the day and 1/12 of the night using a sun dial (hence 24 hours in a day, which is not base-60). The Greeks then made a whole solar day 24 hours and defined an hour as 1/24 of a solar day. It wasn't until the invention of pendulum clocks that sundials were replaced and minutes and seconds could be defined. Because of the math of hours, days, and months; minutes and seconds had to be base-60 in order to be properly geared to have 24 hours in a day. That pendulum swing (or one second) was defined as one swing of the pendulum over one meter of length over the Earth's surface.

    • @pneumonoultramicroscopicsi4065
      @pneumonoultramicroscopicsi4065 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      But one heartbeat is variable according to heart rate

    • @michaelpuglisi1647
      @michaelpuglisi1647 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DoomFinger511 thank your so much!! Your response was very informative and has given me much to think about!

    • @psltmtir
      @psltmtir ปีที่แล้ว +1

      To add to DoomFinger's comment, the clouds are effectively a way of saying how likely an electron is to be there. We know that the electrons are moving in an orbit around the electron, but it's very hard to know exactly where. The electron cloud analogy is how we know where exactly the electron is going to be orbiting most of the time.

  • @JustADioWhosAHeroForFun
    @JustADioWhosAHeroForFun 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Why do people say "I'll be back in a second" when they didn't?

  • @mounilshah9598
    @mounilshah9598 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The entire video was a build up for the pun in the last line. Brilliant work 💯

  • @mohamedoucheikhchewaf4019
    @mohamedoucheikhchewaf4019 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a great platform !👌🏻

  • @_syedmx86
    @_syedmx86 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I think heard the narrator's happiness at the "...second to none" joke at the end 5:23

  • @Tufteputten
    @Tufteputten 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    My mom did this thing when she was mad and counted down until I had to have started doing what she wanted me to do.
    When she came to ONE she would drag it out so long, just to give me a last chance.
    That's how long I wish a second was, because then I could brag about so many things I do in one second. Just ask my wife.

    • @shrenalforever2135
      @shrenalforever2135 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      😂😂😂

    • @satgurs
      @satgurs 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      "I killed 70 people in a second!"

  • @kheonArtStudio
    @kheonArtStudio 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome knowledge just right in time.

  • @lincyjoby4005
    @lincyjoby4005 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video is so informational and underated

  • @gourisree9991
    @gourisree9991 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    "Time is what we want most but what we use worst"
    -William Penn
    Just use time wisely
    Time won't stop for anyone.........

  • @SMAT-gc3yl
    @SMAT-gc3yl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    “Dr Strange would like to know your location”

  • @pandascheme9266
    @pandascheme9266 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The animation is sooo clean !

  • @amirasyraff7159
    @amirasyraff7159 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video again! I love the animation. Also, please make a video about D.I.D (Dissociative Identity Disorder). People need to learn more about it.

  • @KuK137
    @KuK137 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I like how you said Britain started spreading Gregorian calendar in 1500s when they adopted it in 1752, actually...

    • @mo__2808
      @mo__2808 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      and also the second dates back way before 1500, as far back as Babylon. It’s not from the British

  • @shreya...007
    @shreya...007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    When we count as kids we say tick-tick one, tick-tick two so that we don't count too fast when playing hide and seek lol

    • @classicambo9781
      @classicambo9781 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What country was that? Haven't heard that before in Australia.

    • @shreya...007
      @shreya...007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@classicambo9781 Im from India
      Im pretty sure it's just an Indian thing

    • @dhruvasoyantar9656
      @dhruvasoyantar9656 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mississippi!

    • @shreya...007
      @shreya...007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dhruvasoyantar9656 yeah it like saying Mississippi
      Ive heard some people say that

    • @dhruvasoyantar9656
      @dhruvasoyantar9656 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@shreya...007 I know about about tick tick as well.. I'm an Indian too.. but mississippi just sounds great 😅

  • @hdr2540
    @hdr2540 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow. So when my parents were born, seconds didn't exist. Mind-blowing. Thanks for the lesson Ted Ed.

  • @nikoballic1490
    @nikoballic1490 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wtf Ted?!? I have always wander this thing! Thank you bro.

  • @keddrikyvan
    @keddrikyvan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    So if I will be late again in my classes, I can actually reason out that the length of our second was drastically different.

  • @keddrikyvan
    @keddrikyvan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    So if I will be late again in my classes, I can actually say that the length of our second was drastically different.

  • @davidjupiter4307
    @davidjupiter4307 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Ted-Ed for theory of relativity animation there,
    It means a lot to me ❤👍

  • @asucitsme
    @asucitsme 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Absolutely fascinating

  • @hamad7586
    @hamad7586 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I mean literally, everyone knows it's TVA who decides how long a second is.

  • @brunomachado9634
    @brunomachado9634 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Actually, in 1967 there were several elements that hadn't been synthesized yet, so their choice was a little easier!

  • @salanijames4350
    @salanijames4350 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ted ed has the best animation ever. Period.

  • @akilishilo7902
    @akilishilo7902 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The animation is absolutely beautiful

  • @atharvagunde832
    @atharvagunde832 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Can I please know what Software was used for this awesome animation ? The animation and the explanation were Fabulous! I love to watch TED videos, always answering some unique questions!

  • @Rajeevkumar-gz4mv
    @Rajeevkumar-gz4mv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Ok, I had this question in mind for a very long time😂😂

  • @luckynhlanhlatshabalala2475
    @luckynhlanhlatshabalala2475 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I second that. Thanks for this info

  • @kinni02
    @kinni02 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its about TIME someone made a vid about it

  • @gartrux
    @gartrux 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You forgot that a second is also defined as the distance that light travels in free space in one second, and is equal to exactly 299,792,458 metres (983,571,056 ft)

  • @MrSprikiting
    @MrSprikiting 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I'm interrsted to know how they counted the 9Bn+ ticks of the Caesium atom.

  • @vitharana1996
    @vitharana1996 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thankyou very much. 😊

  • @opunpunigyamfi9722
    @opunpunigyamfi9722 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks very much for this, wow...

  • @pranav7994
    @pranav7994 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    i guess something like this is needed for other units of measurements too. like how much exactly is a gram

    • @StraitjacketFitness
      @StraitjacketFitness 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Actually... yeah...

    • @sciuresci1403
      @sciuresci1403 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They already exist for those units.

    • @bovardgabriel5335
      @bovardgabriel5335 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      A gram is 1000 time smaller than a kilogram.
      A kilogram is the weight of a cubic meter of water at the temperature of 4 degree celsius

    • @sciuresci1403
      @sciuresci1403 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bovardgabriel5335 not that's not how a kg is defined anymore. It was changed like 2 years ago. It is completely reliable and based on constants now.

    • @KuK137
      @KuK137 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@bovardgabriel5335 Cubic meter of water is a TON, you're thinking of decimetre...

  • @mahantesh1243
    @mahantesh1243 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Who decides how long a second is?
    Ans: John kitching

  • @NeoFighterX
    @NeoFighterX 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The animation is just perfect

  • @arcticcatgaming9718
    @arcticcatgaming9718 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video!

  • @ColHoganGer90
    @ColHoganGer90 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    British colonialism had nothing to do with the spread of the Gregorian calendar early on as Britain was quite late to adopt it in 1752.

    • @DegreesOfThree
      @DegreesOfThree 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've heard the adoption of the Gregorian calendar is a sign of submission to Rome.

  • @farzanask1088
    @farzanask1088 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Me while counting : 1,2,3,4 Oh I think it's fast
    1...,2.....,3.....4.... Too slow
    1,2,3,4 aah! where is my phone

  • @terrancekayton007
    @terrancekayton007 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well done 👍🏿 this was fun

  • @cmlon
    @cmlon ปีที่แล้ว

    incredible. Thanks

  • @fkmyoutube
    @fkmyoutube 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Others: That would take 30 seconds.
    The TED in me: Well, actually, that would take 275,778,953,100 ticks of a Cesium-133 atom.

  • @brodown64
    @brodown64 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    TH-cam determined that this video was sent a second ago

  • @TheEmperorYt
    @TheEmperorYt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nicely explained

  • @SumitPrasaduniverse
    @SumitPrasaduniverse ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing explanation 👌

  • @mareen129
    @mareen129 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    and I thought who invented second was just the observer of his heart-beat and was a very calm person.

    • @organicfarm5524
      @organicfarm5524 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      And he was most likely 50+ years old at that time.

  • @twitzmixx8374
    @twitzmixx8374 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Them: How long is a second?
    Me: Why did I never thought of this?
    ;-;

  • @user-ky7jh7gr3n
    @user-ky7jh7gr3n 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ty for this vid

  • @MinityMaths
    @MinityMaths 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow really interesting, love the animation too!