ความคิดเห็น •

  • @HolyKoolaid
    @HolyKoolaid 4 ปีที่แล้ว +135

    One second is the amount of time it takes to decrease the gain on your SFX using one of Taran's hotkeys.

  • @Ferodra
    @Ferodra 5 ปีที่แล้ว +262

    Came here because i heard the sound effects were too loud.
    Was not disappointed

    • @0tobsam0
      @0tobsam0 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Taran brought us here @_@

    • @qrdsn
      @qrdsn 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@0tobsam0 same lol

    • @Oheyson
      @Oheyson 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@qrdsn such a #1 amateur mistake :D

    • @jayco10125
      @jayco10125 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      same

    • @CineZoneYT
      @CineZoneYT 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same

  • @bigc6825
    @bigc6825 8 ปีที่แล้ว +523

    don't ever try to eat a clock, it's very time consuming

    • @hattrickster33
      @hattrickster33 8 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      I can...second that -_-

    • @hasoonnine
      @hasoonnine 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +J'zargo lol

    • @cpjyb
      @cpjyb 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +J'zargo me two

    • @lewisirwin5363
      @lewisirwin5363 7 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      They only have minute nutrition benefits.

    • @svtirefire
      @svtirefire 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I hope no one else is going to try their... hand... at chronological humor. Hour patience for that kind of toc is running out.

  • @RobertBrownieJr
    @RobertBrownieJr 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    That's so interesting, the second division of the hour! So simple, never realised that before

  • @theGoogol
    @theGoogol 5 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Please turn up the volume of the sound effects ... I can still hear James talking!
    [/end sarcasm, end video]

  • @Dani-it5sy
    @Dani-it5sy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Only James May can make me watch a 5 min video explaining what a second is.. James you are a genius !!

  • @mikedymonds
    @mikedymonds 11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    To be honest i find these videos useful and although much of the information is instantly lost , james is doing a great job and these videos are a great resource of general or not so common knowledge

  • @MRdovaful
    @MRdovaful 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I had to pick up pieces of my head after watching this. MIND BLOWN

  • @bman68au
    @bman68au 10 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    It's also interesting to note that the use of Caesium-133 in atomic clocks has given rise to the popular and oft misquoted phrase "Caesium the day"

  • @didgemanjan
    @didgemanjan 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you James. not the usual time losing things I usually come across on TH-cam.

  • @denizdurdag
    @denizdurdag 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    James May, you are a gift to the television.

  • @MrLjdude
    @MrLjdude 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Further my comment on the out-takes video I thought maybe that was too narrow a target market so I have tactfully chosen to spam my opinion on all other videos: I'm so glad the series has started. it warms my heart to see the important stuff being discussed!

  • @Entropy114
    @Entropy114 11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Holy poop, I memorized that exact fact about the atomic second from a plaque in the Smithsonian timekeeping exhibit... 14 years ago... And I still have it spot on!
    Boom shakalaka score one for the old memory.

  • @derangedband
    @derangedband 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ahh i really enjoy entertaining/informative presenting! James May's various TV shows all have a lot of witty lovable charm! I'm still amazed by some of the inventions we've seen like the little eye chip that can help the blind to see and the 3D James May. I'd love to see how much the technology progresses in the future :)

  • @j.andrews7832
    @j.andrews7832 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The 60 minute and 60 second division actually dates back to the Sumerians and how they counted. They counted each knuckle on a finger, leading to a count of 12 (hours of night and hours of day...roughly). If you then use the your other hand to keep track of groups of 12, your count is 60. The Sumerians divided their day into 12 day hours, 12 night hours, and divisions of each hour by 60 then each minute by 60; each in equal parts. All related to the way they count, which led to a base 60 counting system. (reference Professor Amanda Podany Ph.D.)

  • @robertgift
    @robertgift 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful, interesting, informative, humorous videos!
    Thank you.

  • @The1AngryHistorian
    @The1AngryHistorian 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you Bernard I could not have put that less clearly myself.

  • @Pauldjreadman
    @Pauldjreadman 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great series. I just come across it. I love information :)

  • @victorengland899
    @victorengland899 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm impressed by the amount of physicists that came out here to have a say.

  • @Nicoder6884
    @Nicoder6884 8 ปีที่แล้ว +99

    A second is exactly one two-hundred-and-seventy-eighth of the length of this video

  • @AstoJim
    @AstoJim 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    James May keep up the good work!

  • @kevinkuka6026
    @kevinkuka6026 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fascinating James may you are amazing and I love airships to!

  • @Formatic8
    @Formatic8 11 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Only James May can explain what a second is in 278 seconds... class

  • @mikechamberlain4503
    @mikechamberlain4503 10 ปีที่แล้ว +84

    The only interesting thing about this video was how the second is now defined somehow in terms of the decay of the cesium atom... and then you stop without event explaining it!

    • @trevorhelton6552
      @trevorhelton6552 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Exactly!

    • @TheEulerID
      @TheEulerID 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      A bit late, but it's not the decay of a caesium atom, it's the frequency of a photon emitted when an electron moves from a particular energy level in an orbital around a caesium atom to one with a lower energy. That's how atoms, including LEDs emit light. Electrons sit at one energy level in an atom and when the move to a lower one, then a photon is emitted. Conversely, when an atom absorbs a photon, the electron jumps up to a higher level. A bit life rungs on a ladder. Electrons in a particular type of atom can only exist in particular energy states which coincide with those rungs (albeit they aren't evenly spaced). It's the spacing of these energy "rungs" which give certain metals a characteristic colour in a flame. Sodium produces yellow for instance. These movements of electrons up and down the ladder are the iconic "quantum leaps".
      Caesium-133 has 55 protons and 78 neutrons in its core, and is the only stable (non-radioactive) isotope of that element, which is maybe why it's chosen. It has a very precisely defined pair of energy levels (hence the hyperfine) which means when an electron transitions down to the lower level, it produced a photon of a very precise frequency. Namely that is 9,192,631,770 cycles per second. That's in the microwave frequency region and well within what can be processed in electronics (that 9.2 Ghz roughly is about 3 times the clock speed of a decent computer). Just think of it as an extremely fast pendulum on a clock.

    • @armanrozika
      @armanrozika 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@TheEulerID This is why time doesn't exist, you can't measure time. What we called as time is a movement of things we can observe

    • @TheEulerID
      @TheEulerID 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@armanrozika oh yes we can measure time. There are these things called clocks, and the second is defined as in terms of a particular transition frequency of a casesium-133 atom. There is no movement, just a change in energy state of an electron in an atom. Before you go on an claim that it's a movement of an electron, then really it's not. It's a change i a wave function.
      Of course, in General Relativity, time is just one of the four dimensions of space-time.

    • @armanrozika
      @armanrozika 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheEulerID I don't understand physics. But you said "particular transition frequency of a casesium-133 atom", you measured that, not time

  • @MadeinHell2
    @MadeinHell2 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you reddit! Up until today I had no idea this channel exists!
    James May ftw

  • @warlac54
    @warlac54 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very imformative, amazing video.

  • @LESLEYYY0
    @LESLEYYY0 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    3:53 for the answer.

  • @loudsoundman
    @loudsoundman 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was amazing!

  • @HAMTechOficial
    @HAMTechOficial 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just subscribed because James asked to me in a very nice way :)

  • @vlenhoff
    @vlenhoff 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love James May

  • @ultraali453
    @ultraali453 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you sir!

  • @Samael78
    @Samael78 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    They are the standard Speedline that come on the Corrado VR6. Not sure if they make them anymore but a close equivalent would be a Compomotive MO.

  • @robloxzhu9329
    @robloxzhu9329 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    James May is Awesome, and People who dislike him go away
    NOW!!!!!!

  • @FLIGHTCOMPANY
    @FLIGHTCOMPANY 10 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    My brain died.

  • @eljay8672
    @eljay8672 8 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    2:00 cue the doctor who theme.

    • @SuperEpicJake
      @SuperEpicJake 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Ben Hobbs Yeah they've gotten progressively worse since Tennant's one.

    • @Eeeeeric416
      @Eeeeeric416 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +xliam127x dunununudununuudunununudununudununundununudununn woooooweeeeeeoooo weeeeeeooooo

    • @AuroraNora3
      @AuroraNora3 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah Eccleston and Tennant had the worst vortex. They were atrociously bad. Matt's second one was amazing, Capaldi's is great.

  • @Elec-DIY
    @Elec-DIY 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Also the time is relative it can vary depending on the speed and the gravity

  • @cklsynt
    @cklsynt 11 ปีที่แล้ว

  • @DevilboyScooby
    @DevilboyScooby 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    2:00 Honestly thought the Doctor Who theme was gonna kick in...
    I'm currently struggling to acknowledge what he's saying because my head has started singing "duh-duh-duh-dum, oohwa ooh..."

  • @GO4Evar
    @GO4Evar 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent thank you

  • @BlueCosmology
    @BlueCosmology 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Since the speed of light is invariant (i.e. always measured to be the same in all situations) it is defined to be an exact number (299792458meters per second) and hence the meter and second are defined from this to make sure this number is exact.

  • @RangerHouston
    @RangerHouston 5 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    According to my girlfriend 1 second is equivalent to approximately 5-10 minutes.

  • @TheKaneDestroyer
    @TheKaneDestroyer 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very interesting.

  • @TheEulerID
    @TheEulerID 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    @0:40 is a room thermostat, not a central heating controller. It most certainly doesn't contain a clock. However, it's oddly marked with numbers, like a thermostatic radiator valve, not using Fahrenheit or Celsius markings.

  • @SteveColen
    @SteveColen 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Head has been squeezed. Thanks.

  • @BlueCosmology
    @BlueCosmology 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    The hyperfine spectrum of Cesium 133 is used as hyperfine levels have very low energy differences and as such the spectrum is largely different from background radiation and is easily determined from background. And as it is very low energy one period is very small so 1 second can be made very precise.

  • @rohitbhat4660
    @rohitbhat4660 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    James.,you should have explored about the time system followed in ancient hinduism..

  • @theowilkinson8802
    @theowilkinson8802 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I LOVE YOU JAMES

  • @Ryukachoo
    @Ryukachoo 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    would it be easier to define a second as a derivation of the time it takes light to travel some distance?
    although i suppose that would be cyclical definitions...a meter depends on seconds light travels, and then a second would depend on the length of a meter

    • @Vengir
      @Vengir 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ryukachoo Congratulations, you've answered your own question.

    • @TheEulerID
      @TheEulerID 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's the other way around. A metre is defined by how far light travels in a given unit of time. Thus we define the second first.

  • @anawsompizza
    @anawsompizza 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    What make and model are the rims on your car? They look neat to me.

  • @jobsinphiladelphia
    @jobsinphiladelphia 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good point!

  • @DevilboyScooby
    @DevilboyScooby 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    kept spamming 4:31, James does an oh-no-you-didn't...

  •  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thi video deserves so many more views :)

  • @TheUpperHead
    @TheUpperHead 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    what's the name of the elevator style music at the end with the greenscreen and james?

  • @garybenade
    @garybenade 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    and now I know.. that I need to watch this again

  • @ohaidare
    @ohaidare 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    ohhh right thanks for clearing that up

  • @MrKDilkington0
    @MrKDilkington0 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is just like "James May's things you need to know about..." series.

  • @zolifer1
    @zolifer1 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your voice is awsome

  • @Tmoblization1
    @Tmoblization1 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    heck this was sick

  • @01322521959
    @01322521959 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'll play old May if I can't get to sleep. This one one on a loop should do the trick.

  • @JohnSmith-tm5xx
    @JohnSmith-tm5xx 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Funny fact is that currently out of all possible measurements, it's time that we do measure with greatest precision and use to define other units.

  • @julienolan5773
    @julienolan5773 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    You're not lost, and you are correct. We use time to measure lots of things, but since time itself is not perfectly measured, it means all calculations with time may be suspect.
    However, this poses no problems for humans on the time scale that we live in... perhaps at some sub-atomic level this may be of concern, but otherwise life just moves on and nobody really notices.

  • @TheFib98
    @TheFib98 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just had to replay the definition of a second over and over.

  • @MelindadelosSantos
    @MelindadelosSantos 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks. Now I have to look up what the 'period' is and properties of the Cesium 133 atom, for curiosity's sake. (I didn't do well in chemistry.) :)

  • @krzysztofmazurkiewicz5270
    @krzysztofmazurkiewicz5270 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just started to wonder if a solar day was much longer (or shorter) than second would also have probobly different lenght. So in general time is something we just agreed to mesure in a particular way but has been sort of made up for our use rather than been observed and measured like gravity or electric current? And scince lots of things are measured using time as a factor everything seems to be relative to it. Im lost here O_O

  • @bridgetospring2829
    @bridgetospring2829 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great show! Sometimes it is hard to hear what he saying over the loud noises.

    • @CineZoneYT
      @CineZoneYT 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Brian yes the sound effects are to loud this was a triple editor

  • @ats7485
    @ats7485 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wish there would have been a bit more explanation of the oscillation of cesium atom and how it defines time.

  • @jonjames8981
    @jonjames8981 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Our perception of time is technically a physical thing because we're just "counting" however many times an electron does that one thing around cesium 133 (sorry I'm not exactly sure what you would call it)

  • @GabCas
    @GabCas 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It has to be measured in a way that other people around the world can replicate it. Simple as that.

  • @TurboTelytJim
    @TurboTelytJim 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    So, why was the original catholic calendar decimal, only to have two more months crow-barred in later (July and August), then the weeks counted in 13 weeks per quarter/ (or season?) like a deck of playing cards, the week into 7 days, the day into base-12, twice, the hours into base-60, with the second [-division] also base-60, then to go decimal once again with the stop-watch divisions of a second. What ever happed to the "third"? How many other calendar divisions have there been, please?

  • @devinkindt2306
    @devinkindt2306 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    very cool

  • @mander40101
    @mander40101 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is one degree of temperature? What is one inch? Not how we determined how to use them. What IS it?

  • @chrishartman8182
    @chrishartman8182 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not to mention that time isn't even constant, it's a different measurement depending on your frame of reference, and it can be affected by gravity.

  • @Del350K4
    @Del350K4 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well, I for one found it interesting - though I had hoped that James would explain his definition. Perhaps a further minute and a half would have been enough to get the idea behind the caesium clock across.

  • @KomalSandhu
    @KomalSandhu 8 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    The defination is
    1 second is the duration of 9192631770 periods of the radiations corresponding to the transition between 2 hyperfine levels at ground state in sezium-133 atom.

    • @iwantitpaintedblack
      @iwantitpaintedblack 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      cesium*
      and a simpler definition can be
      "1 second is the duration in which cesium 133 atom vibrates 9192631770 times"

    • @adrianaselena14
      @adrianaselena14 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      thank you so much I needed a clearer explanation for my physics homework lol

    • @iwantitpaintedblack
      @iwantitpaintedblack 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey you're welcome, i'm glad i could be of some help to you, considering what a fail i was in school :P haha ,

    • @typo691
      @typo691 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +iwantitpaintedblack Caesium*

    • @markmccarthy8336
      @markmccarthy8336 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The hyperfine structure of atoms actually does not have to do with vibration. Because of interactions between the nucleus' spin and the electron's spin, the ground state energy of the electron is very slightly split in two, one energy level having slightly more energy than the other, depending on whether the electron spin is aligned with the nucleus or anti-aligned. The a photon created by an electron transitioning between these two levels has a very specific energy, and thus frequency. Converting this frequency into a period and multiplying by 9192631770 returns one second.

  • @amidamaru0086
    @amidamaru0086 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    It has to do with the frequency of the radiation emitted whilst Cesium-133 atoms decay. You will recall from high school physics that frequency is the amount of time that it takes for a wave traveling at (nearly) the speed of light to go from peak to peak.

  • @nikkukumar856
    @nikkukumar856 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1 second is defined as “9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the cesium 133 atom

  • @davebar96
    @davebar96 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    The look on your profile pic makes that comment even more hilarious

  • @Joseph-C
    @Joseph-C 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh yeah, that reminded me tonight is 'Spring forward', ha

  • @gayleclanton3311
    @gayleclanton3311 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well Sir James....You finally found a subject I can't pay attention to you on.....Decimal points and the square root of TIME.

  • @TheHennotaams
    @TheHennotaams 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    could you pleas explain the phenomenom of water?

  • @appy96
    @appy96 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    is variable of the solar day make second always the same? sun loosing its energy and orbiting and may be independent -un touch other factor may need to considered as second, its now the day of algorithm.
    relation of start of universe /bigbang/ VS SolarDay

    • @appy96
      @appy96 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      means the theory of running of universe VS second

  • @TheFootballboy10
    @TheFootballboy10 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Richard Hammond look at James Legs at 1:44 what he does, I have noticed he does it a lot

  • @SariAlShammari
    @SariAlShammari 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    The comment in the end cracked me up

  • @QueenFondue
    @QueenFondue 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I SECOND that...

  • @johningram2153
    @johningram2153 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did he say "hardish sums"? At 0:30

  • @ChungYungYeng
    @ChungYungYeng 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    KEEP JAMES MAY!

  • @dakduif100
    @dakduif100 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    The second with James May in it, I believe. But I really think it's a great show, it just sounds a bit stupid (what is one second) but I really enjoy it =)

  • @1Horode
    @1Horode 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I knew this already :D

  • @xxMrBaldyxx
    @xxMrBaldyxx 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    in a way, time is what lies between our conscious thoughts.

  • @maxhill9254
    @maxhill9254 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    thx

  • @33fgfhjjggy6y
    @33fgfhjjggy6y 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    One does not simply 'like' James May

  • @ShioreyIzume
    @ShioreyIzume 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Second is defined as the duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom.

  • @Ph4n_t0m
    @Ph4n_t0m 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anyone notice they capitalized the abbreviation of "FLOPS2 wrong (at 0:23)? They show "FLoating Point Operations per Second" (FLPOS)

    • @Lolloz89
      @Lolloz89 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thomas White I bet you are fun at parties :)

    • @Ph4n_t0m
      @Ph4n_t0m 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Haha! I'm a RIOT! XD

    • @kerrydennehy
      @kerrydennehy 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thomas White
      A laugh riot! I didn't know anybody said that anymore. I am so glad they (you) do.

  • @JJM2914
    @JJM2914 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    what's the end music? haha

  • @goodvibrato
    @goodvibrato 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    and how long did that take?

  • @fadyadam100
    @fadyadam100 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    3 u james ur awesome...

  • @aaroo9554
    @aaroo9554 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    when during the beeping?

  • @stephensomersify
    @stephensomersify 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tapping a sun dial nudges the shadow to centre itself

  • @TheAustin11
    @TheAustin11 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hasn't it even more recently defined as the time it takes for light to travel a certain distance?

  • @fergusmccarthy7736
    @fergusmccarthy7736 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    what exactly is an atomic clock?