Thanks for putting 2 together for comparison. Casio MRW 200H bezel is functional, only that it is not clickable, nor lockable rather friction based. It’s usable as it’s not that easily moved by accident. On the other hand, Q&Q bezel is non-movable. That’s decorative to me. Nice to have lume, and seems better on Q&Q. Unfortunately only the tip of the hands are lumed, rendering them no much different from Casio. Because one can’t tell time when you are looking at the two identical hands lume on those tips. Like the metal buckle on Q&Q. Like the ratcheting steps on Casio to prevent strap holder sliding up and down easily. No clear winner to me. Q&Q has thinner case but only Casio has framed date and day to tell more than time. I would still go for Casio considering both. But either one is a good choice.
I agree with you. The Q&Q is more affordable, but it has its limitations, such as lacking a date and day complication, though it does offer better lume. On the other hand, the Casio includes all the essential features of a watch, albeit with subpar lume.
Put simply, the Casio is budget dive watch, while the Q&Q is a field watch in dive watch form. I personally tried on the Q&Q and felt pretty good for my small 6'1 wrist but I've yet to find and try on the Casio.
QQ strap and buckle much ! Tougher! Handset of casio and rotating bezel - better. Dial - gorgeous QQ! Overall QQ wins, i guess, definitely. 🎉 But, what about batteries?? O, yes - absence of complications - good idea.
The Q&Q stands out with better lume and a more affordable price. This watch is powered by the reliable Miyota Cal. 2035 movement, offering a battery life of approximately three years.
Thanks for putting 2 together for comparison.
Casio MRW 200H bezel is functional, only that it is not clickable, nor lockable rather friction based. It’s usable as it’s not that easily moved by accident.
On the other hand, Q&Q bezel is non-movable. That’s decorative to me.
Nice to have lume, and seems better on Q&Q. Unfortunately only the tip of the hands are lumed, rendering them no much different from Casio. Because one can’t tell time when you are looking at the two identical hands lume on those tips.
Like the metal buckle on Q&Q. Like the ratcheting steps on Casio to prevent strap holder sliding up and down easily. No clear winner to me.
Q&Q has thinner case but only Casio has framed date and day to tell more than time.
I would still go for Casio considering both. But either one is a good choice.
I agree with you. The Q&Q is more affordable, but it has its limitations, such as lacking a date and day complication, though it does offer better lume. On the other hand, the Casio includes all the essential features of a watch, albeit with subpar lume.
Put simply, the Casio is budget dive watch, while the Q&Q is a field watch in dive watch form. I personally tried on the Q&Q and felt pretty good for my small 6'1 wrist but I've yet to find and try on the Casio.
The Casio will look great on you too, as it has almost the same case size.
QQ strap and buckle much ! Tougher! Handset of casio and rotating bezel - better. Dial - gorgeous QQ! Overall QQ wins, i guess, definitely. 🎉 But, what about batteries?? O, yes - absence of complications - good idea.
The Q&Q stands out with better lume and a more affordable price. This watch is powered by the reliable Miyota Cal. 2035 movement, offering a battery life of approximately three years.
Im user second hand Q&Q VR18, and i just buy only $2.
That is a good price👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻