Why did the Protestant Reformation happen?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ย. 2024
- By mistake I said "572 AD" as the year when the Roman Empire fell, I meant to say 476 AD when the Gothic tribes sacked Rome and the Western Roman Empire came to an end. I do not write down my scripts and talk from memory.
The Reformation of the western catholic church was long overdue, it did not start with Marin Luther's 95 Theses published in 1517, nor did it end with him. But Luther played a pivotal role in the German / Holy Roman Empire side of things.
What an informative channel.Needs millions of subscribers we must promote this channel.
Thanks
Love from India Sir..!! Very informative and awesome video..!!!👍👍👍
Thx
Great work, regular listener. Knowledge everyday
Thanks my friend
Loved your depth and passion. Would like to help you out and learn from you. ❤🎉
Thx man
Bro you have really done a lot of studies❤❤❤..
Thank you for such a precious and informative video..... ❤❤❤
Thanks a ton
very interesting series. i need to know that why mob lynching did not happen by the disciples of pope or church against those who fought with church?
Sure, I will cover that in next episode.
Sir... Too good, aisa lag raha hai snay baith k discussion hal rahi hai. Maza agiya
Thanks
Waiting desperately for 2nd part of vlog
धन्यवाद सर
You are welcome.
u r doing good work sir keep it up
Thanks - appreciate if you can spread the word and share in your groups
محترم ،
آپ بار بار کہہ رہے ہیں :
کیتولک کی " برائیاں " ۔
لفظ " پرائیاں " کی جگہ :
خامی ، کمی ، کوتاہی یا کمزوری کہیں ۔
❤ liked the topic and information presented
So glad!
What is the future of philosophy as an academic subject with respect to the bigger unsolved mysteries of metaphysics and epistemology?
Yar I am not a big fan of academic philosophy. Look at US which is a capitalistic mindset and wants return on investments - there is no return on investment in philosophy- it’s not a business, that is why philosophy is dying in US.
Metaphysics - almost dead, if not dead already.
Epistemology- a lot is happening, this branch is thriving.
Let me know what you think.
Sir imam gazzali per mazeed wazhat kariye ga ...ak dedicated video baniye
Ok - I will discuss his book the incoherence of philosophers
Eastern Orthodox Christianity pr bhi video banye Great schemes pr Christianity k andr
Haan the great schism - Acha topic hai mughee pasand bhi hai - yar bus time ka masla rehta hai- time milay tou kuch karain
Could you please create an entire show exploring why Muslims historically did not marry with philosophy (science) ?
Yar I deliberately try to avoid controversial areas- though I have my views on the topic you mentioned but - may be later once my channel is some what established . Thanks for liking my content.
Zabardast 😍
Thanks
I think it is funny that few historians note that most of the "evils" of the Catholic (or any religion, in many respects) stem NOT from religion, but from politics. Yes, there was a very learned Martin Luther who disagreed with aspects of Catholic practice in his time and was an important figure in the breaking away of much of Europe from the Catholic Church. He was protected, however, by German and other princes for essentially political reasons (the princes resented the meddling of the Pope in their affairs). Otherwise, Luther would have been killed. The Crusades had many religious aspects, of course, but it is hard to explain it as mostly "religious" when you realize that Saladin routinely fought other Muslims so he could extend his own power and that quite often one "Christian" kingdom in the area allied itself with a Muslim lord against another Christian. Same for the fighting in Spain in the 14th-century.
I do not think, therefore, that most of the "Reformation" hinged on religious ideas. Obviously, armies had religious beliefs and fought against other armies that had other religious beliefs. Still, princes and kings on both sides would withdraw support from their "religious" side for political reasons and sometimes even ally with the "other" religion, if it suited the politics of the rulers. And need I mention the famous Henry The 8th story? He wanted a legitimate heir. He, as a Catholic, could not get divorced from his barren wife, so he took the Church of England "out" of Roman Catholicism and created his own form of Protestantism, so he could marry a woman that would give him a son.
I could go on, but I leave off. I welcome intelligent commentary from those who might think otherwise, especially the atheists who use the thin-reed-argument that the Catholic Church was the cause of so much warfare in the past, entirely ignoring the much more important reality about most all of these wars being started for political reasons, regardless of what the contemporary propaganda was tell "the folks" about the war being about.religion.
I agree with your points above, there were many other factors and not just the religious differences that caused the reformation and it cant all be blamed on Church. However, reformation was overdue and inaction of the popes led to the revolt (there were many, before Luther who raised similar voices e.g., Wycliff and Huss). A slow and gradual reformation would have been much better and less violent. Obviously kings were done following orders of the Popes for last 400 years, nationalistic sentiments were on the rise, kings knew they would gain financially if they cut off with the Catholic Church. I think Henry the VIII was more interested in Church property /tithes then in Anne Boleyn or a heir!!!. Italy wanted to unite, but Church did not want it, due to Papal states. Germany was a very loose confederation and many dukes disliked Church, Germany did not have a one king who could negotiate things on their behalf. France and Spain continued to fight with each other to control the Church. England thought Church is controlled by France.
Protestants were not any better, they were far less tolerant than Church (e.g., they were against science / Copernicus, against jews, they supported inquisition, supported witch hunting, banned books, broke icons, discouraged art and sculpture etc.). I think the reformation resulted in much less tolerant societies for the next 200 years, then before. Also, the reformation (which was German) destroyed renaissance which was Italian (which was Italian)!!!.
At the same time I think there were many things wrong with the Church e.g., papal army, donation of Constantine, ecclesiastical wealth, too much interference in temporal matters, lay investitures etc.
All in all - It had to happen and I like the fact that reformation of the Church was done in a very honest way - even though it was 200 years late, but it was honest. Also I like the fact that the Church did not compromise on any of its doctrines despite immense pressure.
Thanks for your comment.
Taarikh main yazid dhoondtay hain....Wah Ali bhai, maza agaya
Thx Sallu
Nice research
Thanks
Nice
Thanks
जैन धर्म के अलावा दुनिया के लगभग सभी धर्मों ने नरसंहार किए हैं
❤
Thx
excellent
Many thanks
sir is there any whatsapp group where you share your ideas?
Na yara- never thought about one.
We can make one if you think it will be beneficial
@@3rd_POV Sir my thought is as your student i want regular touch with you on daily basic to see your rountine, book you reading, your thought on current situations, quotes you share, life the way you live.
@@a.2407aman please send me an email
Yes do it please @@3rd_POV
🤔 hmmm
Great
Thanks
Interesting
Thanks