Why did Krishna curse Ashwathama? Is he still alive in 2024?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 มี.ค. 2024
- In the Mahabharata, Krishna cursed Ashwathama with immortality for trying to kill the unborn child of Uttarā, the pregnant daughter of Abhimanyu. Krishna suggested that Ashwathama redirect his weapon to an uninhabited place, but instead he aimed it at the womb of Uttara, ending the Pandava lineage. Krishna then revived the stillborn baby, and Ashwathama was forced to give up the gemstone in the middle of his forehead, which was his source of power. The curse means Ashwathama will live forever with a gaping wound on his forehead. Ashwathama was a Maharathi who fought for the Kauravas against the Pandavas in the Kurukshetra War. He was born with a precious stone on his forehead, which was meant to protect him from demons and spirits.
#mahabharata
#Ashwatthama #HinduMythology #Mythology #Warrior #Curse #Immortality #prabhas #amitabhbachchan #bollywood #kalki2898ad - บันเทิง
Jai Shree Radhe Krishna ❤
Ashwathama character introduced in kalki 2898 ad glimpse
good content but the music is a bit dominating the voice-over
reduce the background music!
Hare Krishna🕉️
Fascinating story about Ashwathama on his allegiance to Adharma of Duryodhana,
Why the irritating music when narrating.
Maybe to make the story more engaging 🤷🏽♀️
I really like your animation
You can create your own book or comic
Glad you enjoyed it! Thankyou❤
Lord Krishna never did Curse Ashwatthama. The curse was from the Gem. Do not mislead people please
This is not me saying anything, according to some धार्मिक texts, Krishna cursed Ashwathama to roam the forests until the end of the Kali Yuga with blood and puss oozing from his injuries, and to cry for death, but death would not meet him. The curse also included the requirement to surrender the gem on his forehead- before that, the gem used to protect him.
@@ThatOneLore Okay, then why are you mentioning this as "Mythology"?
Bruh krishna took the gem and cursed him, what you even talking about 😂😂
Why is this a mythological story?
I think the main reason historians and academics refer to them as mythology is because while they do include many important figures and stories that were part of ancient Indian traditions, there isn't sufficient historical evidence or documentation to conclusively prove that everything described literally occurred. The texts include supernatural elements like gods and goddesses intervening in human affairs, as well as magical or exaggerated events that can't be definitively proven. At the same time, I can understand why people who see religious or cultural importance in the epics might view them more as itihas or history. So in a sense, it's more of a debate around definitions, and both viewpoints have validity.
@@ThatOneLore Kindly, Get the eff out of our History bro, *We do not need your "Western validations"* Have your fantasies limited to Christianity, Islam and Other Abrahamic or African traditions🙏🏿
@@ThatOneLore We do not need your viewpoints from so called "historians" or "academics" with *Westernized validations*. Take this mythology bullshit with Christianity, Islam or any other Abrahamic traditions