M3 Grant Tank - Home for my Radial Engine Beltring 2005

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ส.ค. 2024
  • This is where my Radial engine ended up... in an Ex Range Wreck M3 Grant Tank.
    The video shows its first outing at the 2005 War & Peace show down in Kent. "restoration" was by Carl Brown of C+C Military. SEE Video of engine running , on my drive, before it went into the Grant • Continental R975 Wrigh...

ความคิดเห็น • 879

  • @JoeBob461
    @JoeBob461 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Rescued from target duty and rolling under its own power! Wow! What an amazing piece of work!

    • @PaulDonovan
      @PaulDonovan  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      it is remarkable... 😎👍

  • @hoodoo2001
    @hoodoo2001 12 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wonderful to see an historic old tank like that saved from oblivion. It can still tell so much to so many.

  • @brdm2rkh
    @brdm2rkh 10 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Restoration was done at Cand C military, was saved as it was one of the first of 2 grants shipped to britain for trails. Ended its life on Pirbrite ranges as a infantry anti tank target and most of the holes are 3.5 inch bazooka. I helped recover it in 2003 and did some of the wiring and refited a clutch to engine as it did not have 1.

    • @chicotruco
      @chicotruco 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      please take more videos and upload them I want to see more of this legend

    • @user-fl1bq6uo5l
      @user-fl1bq6uo5l 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chicotruco I can send you some if you like

    • @josephbragg5445
      @josephbragg5445 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes evidently they put an aviatin radial engine in it I was wondering about the cooling system I assume this is still air cooled must have made up special cowling for this engine thank you foe your comments

  • @PaulDonovan
    @PaulDonovan  12 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I love the discussions as to whether it is a Lee or a Grant. I have no idea but it is interesting to see everyone's comments !!

  • @belchnasty
    @belchnasty 12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent job guys, nice to see someone breathing life back into "wrecks"

  • @qbankilla
    @qbankilla 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    for anyone that are confused the m3 grant is the same as the m3 lee same tank just that the grant has a diferent turret but still is the same tank
    (The Medium Tank M3 was an American tank used during World War II. In Britain the tank was called by two names based on the turret configuration. Tanks employing US pattern turrets were called the "General Lee", named after Confederate General Robert E. Lee. Variants using British pattern turrets were known as "General Grant")

  • @dickjohnson5025
    @dickjohnson5025 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That is so damn cool!! I cannot imagine how loud it must be inside.

  • @markcantemail8018
    @markcantemail8018 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very nice scars and all ,its moving . Thank you for doing this to us , most people like it .

  • @jerrymail
    @jerrymail 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is a M3 Grant, the version with the special cast turret built by request of British Army. The "neck" of the turret was accommodated to put a radio set in it, instead of the main body.
    This turret was only used for the British M3 Grant (which was deployed in North Africa) and never by U.S. Army. All the others common U.S. versions (with normal turret) used under British flag were called "Lee" Mark something.

  • @davidgibbings6085
    @davidgibbings6085 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I remember standing near the back end of this grant , on starting it backfired, scared the shit out of me at war n peace 😂

  • @Tankdriver-cx5cn
    @Tankdriver-cx5cn 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hi paul this is Elliott. Nick Mead didn't restore this as it says in the description. This was done by my dad carl brown of ccmilitary.

  • @ralphliu34
    @ralphliu34 10 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I love lees. Nice restoration with just the engine!

    • @PaulDonovan
      @PaulDonovan  10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thanks for your comment.... (its a Grant !)

  • @Deadeye-sj3qc
    @Deadeye-sj3qc 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    awesome video bud saving history 1 bolt at a time.

  • @evanhughes7609
    @evanhughes7609 10 ปีที่แล้ว +84

    Very much a stopgap design.
    "We need a bigger gun. No, I don't care where you put it." Famous last words.

    • @drdrumbeat3010
      @drdrumbeat3010 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Look, they put it in back to front, don't you see the state of the tank ? :)

    • @overboss9599
      @overboss9599 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @proteusx ever heard of the bob semple tank?

    • @trevvorphilip2515
      @trevvorphilip2515 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      proteusx ever heard of anything made by the french

    • @rocket_sensha4337
      @rocket_sensha4337 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @proteusx have you heard of the archer?

    • @karel-de-Grote
      @karel-de-Grote 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@trevvorphilip2515 French??? M3 Lee / Grant mounts a 75 mm cannon of French construction of 1895 !!! uahuahuahuah !!! ridiculous!!!

  • @gullreefclub
    @gullreefclub 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are correct the M3 was 2 feet taller than the Panzer III or the Fiat M13. However the M3 biggest battles in 1942 were in desert of North Africa where that extra 2 feet of height make much easier to spot a long way off. It height disadvantage was compounded by the fact that the low height of the sponson mounted main gun meant that the tank had to fight in a "Hull-Up" compared to the Panzer and Fiat that could fight "Hull-Down" thus being forced to expose much less of them selves in battle

  • @DIVeltro
    @DIVeltro 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @oldview2
    The M3 was actually a stop-gap tank. They needed to put a 75mm gun in a tank, but the current turret rings were not large enough to place the gun in. As an interim measure until the M-4 entered service, they placed a 75mm gun in a sponson position on a current tank. They were rotated into other theaters as soon as possible.

  • @caro7048
    @caro7048 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    And suddenly the algorithm brought me here!
    Glad to see the Afrika Corps didn't completely destroy this beauty.

    • @PaulDonovan
      @PaulDonovan  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      lol... love that algorithm. How about this.... th-cam.com/video/wNZ1Jc1OHcs/w-d-xo.html regards Paul

  • @TheIhredpower
    @TheIhredpower 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome to see one of these actually moving. Most of them are on a plinth. Cheers!

  • @AndreiTupolev
    @AndreiTupolev 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    I saw this at Bovington a few years back. Very impressed how smooth & quiet the engine was, even if the rest of the tank wasn't quite so much. :P

  • @weresonic11
    @weresonic11 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That's a M3 lee You got there. =3 Nice find

  • @PaulDonovan
    @PaulDonovan  12 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I'm pretty sure the shaft would have had a cover over it ... well hopefully !

  • @morten1975dk
    @morten1975dk 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Cool. Some more work, parts and paint,
    and it will be a beauty..

  • @EugeneStClair-hr4vq
    @EugeneStClair-hr4vq 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is actually the M3 Lee, the export version. It was shipped to the UK as part of the American Lend Lease program. You can tell from the top turret which is the British version. Great to see one running.

    • @PaulDonovan
      @PaulDonovan  10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Indeed..... the British called it the Grant. The turret is different to accommodate the British Radio Sets.

    • @FairladyS130
      @FairladyS130 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lend lease and not a gift because the US had the UK over a barrel. You fight the war, we'll make money.

  • @shtookatz
    @shtookatz 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    A lot of holes in that thing! Great to see it running again after being on a range.

  • @zimzam52
    @zimzam52 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    LOOKS GREAT
    Glad to see the old Grant moving, Probably not more than a couple still running.

  • @jamesluthercantrell5581
    @jamesluthercantrell5581 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    That is a old tank and what kind is it and what is the year and who makes it and how much did it cost new

    • @PaulDonovan
      @PaulDonovan  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The title of the video gives the type... M3 Grant. if you google it you may find the answer to your other questions. Regards Paul

  • @442hoeky
    @442hoeky 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    True enough. The Grant was a dinosaur of a design before the war even started, but as a U.S. Tank, it's primary role was infantry support - and it had plenty of punch in this department. A 75mm HE round doesn't care that's it's a low velocity round when it explodes next to soft targets! It also had numerous machine guns and I believe they even had canister shot for the 37mm (I know they produced canister for the 37mm, I just can't remember if the Grant/Lee carried this ammo).

  • @PaulDonovan
    @PaulDonovan  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi... there are bullet holes all over it. The tank was on an army firing range for many years so was shot hundreds of times. The current owner (not me) restored it to running condition, using an engine which i supplied (see videos of the engine running before it was fitted on my youtube channel - or search for wright whirlwind radial engine) He decided to leave all the bullet / shell holes.... certainly a bit different. I will try and get some close up photos. cheers Paul

  • @Maamorth
    @Maamorth 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    yes it's M3 Lee it's confirmed, seen in Museum in USA, CA state. called M3 Lee, a " Half TD and half tank " so it like a hybrid, of tank destroyer (TD) and standard tank with turret on top.

  • @harper1967
    @harper1967 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    fantastic tank, superseded quickly I know but still my fave tank.

  • @qbankilla
    @qbankilla 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Medium Tank M3 was an American tank used during World War II. In Britain the tank was called by two names based on the turret configuration. Tanks employing US pattern turrets were called the "General Lee", named after Confederate General Robert E. Lee. Variants using British pattern turrets were known as "General Grant"

  • @Treetop64
    @Treetop64 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's a Grant. The turret gives it away. The Lees had a smaller turret for the 37mm, with no bustle overhang, whereas the Grant had the larger turret with bustle overhang. The radio was kept in the hull of the Lee, and the it was kept in the turret bustle of the Grant.

  • @1942PANTHERV
    @1942PANTHERV 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    still missing parts i see..but wow..great job getting her running again

  • @carloschavez5368
    @carloschavez5368 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That's LaLa Bell same from" Sahara" Humphrey Bogart movie. Awesome it runs and moves.

    • @PaulDonovan
      @PaulDonovan  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      lol... thanks for your comment. Here is my military vehicle... th-cam.com/video/ZWJUCdHUhYk/w-d-xo.html regards Paul

  • @JohnoO_O_
    @JohnoO_O_ 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    That things taken a pasting on the 'ol range, thanks for restoring

  • @amateurphilosopher
    @amateurphilosopher 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like how those two people at the end of the clip seem to be oblivious to the tank rolling up behind them. Maybe you need to add a horn!

  • @chicotruco
    @chicotruco 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    a lot of people hate this tank on world of tanks, for me, best tank ever

  • @mcdonaldluke6
    @mcdonaldluke6 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    amazing that range wrecks are getting this sort of treatment.

  • @PaulDonovan
    @PaulDonovan  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Radial engines were used.... But not in many vehicles.... The Grant and the Priest SPG.... Were the main ones.... The Stuart light tanks had a 7 cylinder Radial.... And there was a diesel one to made by Guilberson..!

  • @beardo52
    @beardo52 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its from WWII, but does have riveted armor as the earlier tanks had. It was needed in the Desert, so off it went with rivets. The Stuart light tank also utilized riveted construction.

  • @MrAipot
    @MrAipot 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @onigojira I must remind you, T-34 had a large and sharp slope of 45 degrees, Sherman had a blunt rounded slope, Sherman also had a very high figure and it was an easy target for German tanks and guns. Russian tankers proklyanali Sherman. They were vulnerable, had a weak instrument. Only an advantage - simplicity and cheapness of production.

  • @PaulDonovan
    @PaulDonovan  12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I understand the owner wants to keep it as it is !

  • @deflibrarian
    @deflibrarian 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    M3 Grant is the British version, has a slightly different turret. and has one less crew person (the radio operator). The Grant has thicker armour than the Lee. The Lee has a commander's cupola, which you can see this one doesn't have, so thats the easiest way to see that is is a M3 Grant.

  • @scottduncan44
    @scottduncan44 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @oldview2
    The Grant was the right tool at the right time. Despite its limitations it gave the 8th Army a reliable mobile unit capable of dealing with most German armor with its 37mm gun and a large caliber gun firing an effective high explosive shell which enabled the tanks to engage the anti tank gun screen at long range . It also had the reliable suspension used on the later M-4. It previewed the positive traits of later american tanks.Reliable,mobile easy to operate and maintain.

  • @thebmxdad
    @thebmxdad 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    the british named the m-3 tanks Lee and Grant according to which turret was on the tank...the original turret,with the 37 mm gun,and a smaller turret housing a 30 cal.MG was designated LEE,while the low profile turret,without the 30 cal turret(as shown in this video) designated the Grant. therefor,the tank in video is a Grant..

  • @PaulDonovan
    @PaulDonovan  12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi... 9 cylinders 16 litres Supercharged 400 BHP - Air cooled !! if you search TH-cam for " Continental Wright Whirlwind R975 " you will see the engine running before it went into the tank. cheers Paul

  • @PaulDonovan
    @PaulDonovan  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent comment.... thanks for your interest.. Paul

  • @Lumpyone
    @Lumpyone 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shades of "SAHARA"...cool, especially with all the AP divots in it.

  • @screamingcockatoo
    @screamingcockatoo 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I hope you welded up all the holes and restored it!

  • @MindOfCorruption97
    @MindOfCorruption97 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    The M3 Grant tank, or better known as the M3 Lee. was indeed used in WW2. Though it was an OK tank, it wasn't as good as the M4 Sherman, which later replaced the M3. It did take part in WW2.

  • @PNolandS
    @PNolandS 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Grant: Tis but a scratch!
    Panzer IV: A scratch!? Your gun’s off!
    Grant: No it isn’t.
    Panzer IV: Look!
    Grant: ...I’ve had worse.

  • @Treetop64
    @Treetop64 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes. The M3 Lee (smaller top turret) had radio in the hull, while the M3 Grant (larger top turret, shown here) had the radio inside the turret.

  • @Jesses001
    @Jesses001 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A bit rough, but it runs. That is a good start. Seems to run well actually. Just tons of cosmetic issues to work out, and find a 37mm for it...oh and I think that 75mm barrel might be done for with that cracked barrel, ha. I always liked the look of the Lee, and the Grant is nearly the same. Kind of a so ugly it is cute thing going for it.

    • @PaulDonovan
      @PaulDonovan  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for taking the time to write... much appreciated. Paul

  • @elee1086
    @elee1086 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hey Paul this is cool as crap! I love the old lee tanks. This is the only one out side of new reels from WWII that I have ever seen.

    • @PaulDonovan
      @PaulDonovan  10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Elmer... Thanks for your comment.... much appreciated. Regards Paul

    • @TemplarX2
      @TemplarX2 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Crap is not cool. :)

    • @iloveRUSSIAAA
      @iloveRUSSIAAA 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hey TemplarX2 crap enthusiast Cessna 182a here to tell you that crap is INDEED cool.

    • @Pynaegan
      @Pynaegan 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      TemplarX2 Depends on how long it's been laying there.

  • @PaulDonovan
    @PaulDonovan  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for your comment.... agreed... great machine..! Paul

  • @MrAipot
    @MrAipot 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @onigojira T-34 being the best in the class of medium tanks! In the class of heavy tanks, the tank was the best Russian IS-2 and IS-3.

  • @PaulDonovan
    @PaulDonovan  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent comments... Many thanks.

  • @PaulDonovan
    @PaulDonovan  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think that there is a cover that goes over the shaft ! this vehicle is not yet finished. cheers Paul

  • @PaulDonovan
    @PaulDonovan  12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi have you seen the video of the radial engine, running on my drive, before it went in the tank ?

  • @longi625
    @longi625 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow! It's really surprising how thin that side armour is. Hopefully it'll get a bit of tlc at some point.

    • @PaulDonovan
      @PaulDonovan  ปีที่แล้ว

      I think they plan to keep it like it is !! Regards Paul

    • @longi625
      @longi625 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PaulDonovan Really? That's interesting. I always liked the Lee & Grant tanks, they almost look Warhammer or steam punk! I must say if like to see it brought up to its former glory.

  • @PaulDonovan
    @PaulDonovan  12 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have restored a few British "Tanks"... most seem to have front drive. Cheers Paul

  • @thra5herxb12s
    @thra5herxb12s 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @ffjsb Oh yes I figured that one out. The Scorpion Armoured Car we have was cut to bits by a film company and then blown up and stuck back together a few times until they got the shot they needed.

  • @TheAugust8
    @TheAugust8 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    In the Soviet army, where the tank was supplied under the lend-lease, the soldiers called him BM-6 - "Bratskaya mogila na shesterih" (Common grave for six persons)

  • @NoOne3234
    @NoOne3234 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    The nickname "Lee" was actually used for versions with American turrets. The turret on this one is British, though.

  • @criticalmass181
    @criticalmass181 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    How cool is that? I was 'given' 2 Grants to make a static restoration, back in the 90's, for First Armoured. Unfortunately, they wouldn't let me do anything with the engines. Would have been great to take one of them for a spin. Great video.

  • @DARIVSARCHITECTVS
    @DARIVSARCHITECTVS 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bad tank or not, I would LOVE to see this vehicle fully restored.

  • @johninmelb
    @johninmelb 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Restoring a range target, well done! As for those comparing these to the German tanks, yep, they were slow, yep, the 75mm had limited traverse, yep, they were high. But they worked and they were produced in quantity. There's no point comparing these to the later Panzers. Try comparing one of the the later Panzers to 4 x Shermans or 7 x T34's, backed up by four or five ground attack aircraft like the Typhoon!

  • @PaulDonovan
    @PaulDonovan  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    It belongs to Carl Brown and was recovered from Pirbrite. It was the first Grant received by Britain and was used extensively for trials both during and after the war.
    It's last duty was for the testing of armoured ammo bins and was stripped of paint for that trial so as not to obscure the observation of the hits with burning paint.
    The majority of the damage was caused by Panzerfaust and Panzershreck weapons captured at the end of the war.

  • @Dave2108
    @Dave2108 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love this, seen it a few times and just love all the bullet holes..

  • @guild302
    @guild302 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    tigers were diesel, Panthers were petrol. The Shermans didn't 'brew up' because of their fuel, they caught fire because early models kept their ammunition in a vulnerable place. the inclusion of a simple dousing water jacket virtually cured the Sherman's tendency to light up.

  • @scottduncan44
    @scottduncan44 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    The M-3 was a succesful tank. It was the right tool at the right time. It gave the British a reliable fast tank capable of firing both HE and AT. When it was introduced the 75mm was capable of destroying any German tank at a good range. The Engine, transmission, suspension,tracks and gun were all carried over into the M-4 Sherman. The M-3 was rushed into production before the U.S. was able to produce a turret for the 75mm. It continued to serve succesfuly in the Far East.

  • @Potatonaught
    @Potatonaught 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    nice ride, and plenty of room for you and your buddies

  • @Obsidianiron
    @Obsidianiron 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did you see the drive shaft go up the middle of the tank, I wonder how many tankers got wrapped around that?

  • @PhilosopherGaming
    @PhilosopherGaming 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    It did carry canister shot. Also a pretty nasty AP round for the 75mm which people seem to often forget.

  • @PaulDonovan
    @PaulDonovan  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi... Yes the holes are Bullet / Shell holes !
    The tank was rescued from a army firing range and the owner decided to restore it to running condition.... but to leave all the holes. Makes for a very unique and interesting vehicle ! I supplied the Engine... a Wright Whirlwind 16 liter Radial. regards Paul

    • @wishusknight3009
      @wishusknight3009 ปีที่แล้ว

      How is the engine cooled? is there cowling or something to direct air?

  • @claeslindgren2704
    @claeslindgren2704 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Still imagine how intimidating that thing must have looked coming at you as an infantry man in ww2

    • @PaulDonovan
      @PaulDonovan  ปีที่แล้ว

      Very intimidating 👍

  • @DET832
    @DET832 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    WOW !! Nice rescue !!! Restore that baby !! Good luck and thanks for the post !!!

  • @teller1290
    @teller1290 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    With gunner and loader typically located opposite the centrally located gun, I wonder how this offset 75mm was loaded and fired when its right side was flush up against armored right side of tank?

    • @PaulDonovan
      @PaulDonovan  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      interesting point 😎👍

  • @PaulDonovan
    @PaulDonovan  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks.... I think the original tank would have had a cover over the shaft.... and I assume one has now been fitted. Thanks Paul

  • @mrbeefhbw
    @mrbeefhbw 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Because that's not the main gun. That side gun is a 75mm low velocity HE gun. Meant to take on troops and fortifications. The main gun is the 37mm AT gun mounted in the turret.

  • @dynaflow666
    @dynaflow666 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Paul. Cheers and greetings to the States

  • @xionz83
    @xionz83 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    i love the racing seat on top of the prop shaft

  • @PaulDonovan
    @PaulDonovan  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for you comment - much appreciated !

  • @dylanmccallister1888
    @dylanmccallister1888 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Germany had no chance. They put a clutch in it, did some wiring, drove it off a target practice field. It had been hit by how many antitank bazooka and rifle rounds and it decided to start up and drive away.
    German tanks broke down under their own weight without being shot to shit.

    • @PaulDonovan
      @PaulDonovan  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi.... this tank certainly did not just start up and drive away lol regards Paul

  • @granskare
    @granskare 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    these tanks were moved to Burma and the Japanese had nothing to throw against them but the Japanese tried anything to get them so special patrols had to be set up to watch for that...amazing stuff :)

    • @Paulosilva-hk8bo
      @Paulosilva-hk8bo 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      This tank is british.... not american...

    • @granskare
      @granskare 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      hmm, it is of an American design, called a Lee here and a Grant by the British....whatever, the basic thing was manufactured in America....it was a stopgape design...the M2 was kept for training purposes...but yours is super :)

  • @petercofrancesco3457
    @petercofrancesco3457 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Remembering ,lulubell. whether it's a British turret, or US Grant ,or Lee, Sahara with Humphrey Bogart, J Carroll Nash and many others, what a great movie ! They maka the tank ina of Pittsburgh,I ah, U .S a Ah, God bless you!

    • @PaulDonovan
      @PaulDonovan  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Peter Cofrancesco Peter.... Thanks for taking the time to write. Much appreciated.. Paul

    • @petercofrancesco3457
      @petercofrancesco3457 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Paul Donovan, thank you for your great video! excellent job! I did The Glenn Miller Memorial, Grove Street Cemetery, New Haven ,Connecticut. USA. You and I are keeping military vehicle history alive! Best regards, Pete.

  • @THESLlCK
    @THESLlCK 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Still crankin!

  • @Paulymade
    @Paulymade 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thats cool my dad drove one in ww2 great to see history come back to life.

  • @dejected107
    @dejected107 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    0:06 you wouldn't wanna fall back on your seat on that thing. i think its a cool tank

  • @PaulDonovan
    @PaulDonovan  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    It was missing I think.... but I assume one will be fabricated and fitted. Regards Paul (note: i shot the video but do not own the tank)

  • @PaulDonovan
    @PaulDonovan  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    The British Army used this tank and fitted a modified turret... it has a bulge on the rear to accommodate the radio equipment.... they called theirs a Grant. regards Paul

  • @PaulDonovan
    @PaulDonovan  12 ปีที่แล้ว

    I agree... it has the bulbous back to the turret to house the radios

  • @PaulDonovan
    @PaulDonovan  11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    m3 grant is the same as the m3 lee same tank just that the grant has a different turret but still is the same tank
    In Britain the tank was called by two names based on the turret configuration. Tanks employing US pattern turrets were called the "General Lee", named after Confederate General Robert E. Lee. Variants using British pattern turrets were known as "General Grant")
    The British Turret has an extended rear section to take the larger british radio sets.

  • @PaulDonovan
    @PaulDonovan  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for your comment. Paul

  • @stevenspaziani9159
    @stevenspaziani9159 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looking great.

    • @PaulDonovan
      @PaulDonovan  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Its a very cool vehicle. Cheers Paul

  • @terrysmith4831
    @terrysmith4831 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mr. Donovan, are you planning a complete restoration of the tank? I've looked around the Web and youtube but can't find anything.

    • @PaulDonovan
      @PaulDonovan  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Terry Smith hi Terry. I'm not the owner.... I supplied the Radial Engine. My understanding was that the owner wanted to keep it as it is in the video. Essentially and driveable range wreck. However like you I have look around the Web and can not find any further information. I've not seen it at a show for some years now. Regards Paul

  • @PaulDonovan
    @PaulDonovan  11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Correct.. its an M3 Grant

  • @BoatManBeats
    @BoatManBeats 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    To have a radial engine in a tank.... 0.0.
    Makes it win no matter what! ;D Cool vid! and a neat vehicle, though it definitely has a sore reputation from its past...

  • @Triple88a
    @Triple88a 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Exhausts pointed at the fuel tanks, driveshaft through the middle of the crew cab... seems safe.

  • @richardreed7772
    @richardreed7772 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    yes, a Grant made at the Pullman plant in Worcester Mass.