Expert reveals why CrowdStrike outage affected the world on such a large scale

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ต.ค. 2024
  • Independent analyst Paul Budde says the global economic system “favours large companies” which is why the CrowdStrike incident affected the world on such a large scale.
    “Because then you can actually offer services for lower prices,” he told Sky News Business Reporter Steph Nash.
    His comments follow CrowdStrike’s global outage on Friday which left thousands of companies unable to function properly for several hours.

ความคิดเห็น • 24

  • @davefoord1259
    @davefoord1259 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    And so you dont need an army, just one guy infiltrating a it company and bring the world into chaos

    • @vivrowe2763
      @vivrowe2763 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes test run.

  • @DrKaoliN
    @DrKaoliN 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    6:45 This incident doesn't have anything to do with "the cloud" in itself. It was due to no prior testing i.e. bad practice.
    So blaming the cloud is simply misleading in this case.

    • @rajeevkaushek7370
      @rajeevkaushek7370 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I thought it was an Azure problem first but Crowdstrike botched up the Windows OS instead (be in Server, client or VM)

  •  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cash is king when the electrons don't behave. I'm not sure if Labour and the Greens are too upset about the disrupted flights because that's what they are working towards and they get to fly private.

  • @charlespoirier8527
    @charlespoirier8527 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    There’s no doubt about it plan B packages are needed .

  • @GovernYourself
    @GovernYourself 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Decentralisation is the future. Centralisation = controlling and a single point of failure.

  • @stevenkuykendall1079
    @stevenkuykendall1079 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Blackrock was the major owner of this before selling off a bunch a year ago. They've use their influence as major stock holder to force their other companies to make policies requiring the use of these types of products. We can only hope it was just for profit, but they certainly will use a company to it's death to promote their other holdings. I'm looking at you Disney.

  • @downtoearth1950
    @downtoearth1950 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When Tech, is piled upon Tech, upon Tech one tiny glitch and it falls over,........and Capitalism cares not❗😮

  • @Design_no
    @Design_no 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Did he turn it off and on again?

    • @johnsheetz6639
      @johnsheetz6639 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No way! Pshhh, everybody knows it's control alt delete! 😂

    • @Design_no
      @Design_no 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@johnsheetz6639sometimes you need to turn it off. Just ask Roy.

  • @vivrowe2763
    @vivrowe2763 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cyber attack they are saying everywhere but here.

  • @gotthesinglelife
    @gotthesinglelife 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So the system is a problem but trust a smarter A1 and hope it works better. Then who is making sure the smart A1 is infallible it just seems you have just given it total control.

  • @gorttman798
    @gorttman798 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sounds good in principal but most companies have therm selves to blame.
    Many years ago when I ran the ITSec team for a large government department we never loaded sec product data without testing We were able to do this manually including thorough testing. Modern ci/cd pipelines could have automated this function and easily detected this failure.
    This is a business failure not IT. Business has become way too focussed on cost cutting. Often by over reliance on outsourcing at the cost of risk mitigation, institutional knowledge and ability to respond to external forces. Shifting basic risk mitigation provided by pre-testing all data loads capable of killing systems to the vendor without some sort stop gap shows a fundamental lack of risk management.
    It’s not like this has never happened before. Many of the affected companies modst likely monitor their networks using solar winds. So in other words another opportunity to learn from history missed.

    • @jakobole
      @jakobole 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The same solar winds that was also hit some time ago....

  • @MarkyGoldstein
    @MarkyGoldstein 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's basically the Windows Update mechanism, which is currently a risky design. But as you likely know, the blue screen has been around for quite a while... Hopefully Microsoft can finally fix this. But the best solution is to accelerate the Linux migration for critical systems.

    • @jakobole
      @jakobole 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It has nothing to do with MS. Zero

  • @Floreypottery
    @Floreypottery 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Keep lying bs

  • @Whereareyouthen
    @Whereareyouthen 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Experts😂😂😂😂😂

  • @positivepawpaw7564
    @positivepawpaw7564 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    JUSTIFICATION FOR THEIR HUMAN BAR CODE - DIGITAL ID. THE MARK. WITHOUT WHICH YOU CAN NOT BUY SELL OR TRADE.