Jesus' First Sermon in Nazareth: Synagogues, Pharisees, and the Jubilee Year
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ม.ค. 2019
- In this video, a excerpt from the Mass Readings Explained, Dr. Brant Pitre discusses Jesus' first "homily" or "sermon" in a synagogue in Nazareth. After reading from Isaiah 61, Jesus sits down and tells the audience that Isaiah reading has been fulfilled in their hearing, the first time Jesus makes an explicit attestation to his Messianic identity. Dr. Pitre also gives insight into what synagogues were like as well as what the expectation was for the Jubilee year, when the Messiah would come.
Notable excerpt:
"Another little side note, this is why Jesus is going to get into conflict with the Pharisees so much in the gospels. Have you ever wondered why he’s always bumping heads with the Pharisees? It’s not because the Pharisees were priests. They weren’t priests either; they were laymen who mastered the scriptures and who studied the traditions of the fathers and they ran the show in the synagogues. So if Jesus’ custom was to go about preaching in the synagogues, the first people he’s going to come into conflict
with aren’t the priests in the temple of Jerusalem, it’s the Pharisees, the lay people in the synagogues who were used to preaching and teaching tradition of the fathers, then Jesus steps in and he blows them all out of the water."
Learn more about the Mass Readings Explained here: catholicproductions.com/pages...
Find Bible studies by Dr. Brant Pitre here: catholicproductions.com/colle...
Visit Dr. Pitre's website here: www.brantpitre.com/
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
![กินอาหาร ถูก vs แพง!! จานละ 500,000 vs จานละ 50!! [Ver. 2024]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FF_HppKg4vs/mqdefault.jpg)
These videos are great! Priests should incorporate this sort of thing in their homilies on Sunday. We need to increase the depth of our knowledge concerning our faith.
This explanation is what makes reading the Bible with the right lens!! Thanks Dr Pitre
I have his books and watch every video of his. I can't get enough of his lucid teaching.
3 Hail Marys with love from Liverpool England x
Wow!💖 I have to rewatch this & take some notes 📝🥰
Thank you so much, Dr Pitre, you have helped me to understand so much through your teachings!
I never knew the Pharisees of the New Testament were laymen and not priests.
@Fraevo - A lot of the priests would have been Pharisees and some would have been Sadducees, the High Priest Caiaphas for example was a Sadducee. Many of the priests/pharisees converted to christianity(Acts6:7, Acts15:5).
@@Sean-lv6fx paul says hi 😂
He was making the distinction, as the Gospels also do, between the Levitical priesthood and the teachers in the synagogues.
Thanks Dr. Pitre for the exceptional teaching, I'm learning a lot. God bless always.
Good background info! Thanks Dr. Pitre.
Awesome! Thanks, Dr. Brant.
Awesome!
Perfect!
Wonderful!
Wow!!! Amazing
Thank you for another great explanation! Have you ever considered doing the readings for the extraordinary form?
I can't see Wall Street going along with the idea of a Jubilee year.
can you deduce what the first reading was from the torah?
What is the Torah reading for that day?
Then according to that debt ridding would not the house you bought go back to previous owners or property that you purchased when the previous owner lost it due to maybe bad management or other reasons. Debt forgiveness might be great for some but devastating to others. Dr Pitrie could you explain further
So which year was a Jubilee?
The first year of his ministry or the year he was crucified?
Matthew Aislabie
The debt was paid. By who? Jesus on the cross.
What about the Jesuits do they believe in JESUS AS OUR LORD AND SAVIOUR?
Absolutely! Have listened to Father Mitch Pacwa?
Zacharias is an Aaron Zadok High Priest John the Baptist is also a High Priest Mary and Elisabeth are cousins and the Daughters of Aaron, which makes Jesus a Zadok Priest. (he is not a layman. )== Shalom.
did a jubilee year occur during the life of jesus christ? when? prove?
@@po18guy im curious about it because Jesus said it when he read Isaiah
@@po18guy i dont care whether they celebrated it or not. The important thing for me is, did a jubilee year occur during the lifetime of jesus? More specifically during his 3.5 yr ministry? I heard that there are enough astronomical data in the Bible to reconstruct all chronologies. For example, Jesus died precisely 3pm april 14, 33ad because it occurred during a lunar eclipse. Herods death should be recalculated to dec 29 1bc etc
@@po18guy that’s not my aim. My aim is the peer-reviewed refutation and overturning of the wrong dating of events in the Bible. Because of the computational power and mathematical understanding of astronomical dating, events in the bible can be accurately be dated to the second. It’s just math
@@po18guy the Bible is also history
The laymen pharisees sound like Protestant pastors in terms of preaching in their place of worship, but not themselves being priests
Or like Catholic lay-ministers and teachers, like Dr Pitre.
@@brackguthrie9470 except for the Protestant ministers their sermon IS the worship service. For Dr. Pitre, like in this video, is simply explanation and teaching. Dr. Pitre isn’t worshipping by giving his sermon. For him, the sacrifice of the Mass is how he worships.
In old testament Isaiah prophesied Jesus Christ a wonderful councilor a prince of peace. Etc etc mostly ancient Jews they don't understand Torah of Moses.
It's true comes from the Bible . If I were you read the New testament 4 evangelist and Acts up to Revelation . I tell you real the Sabbath it's Jesus Christ .in NT you will find the comparison between Moses and Jesus Christ . Adam and Jesus Christ. Etc etc.
Amen and Amen,God bless you ,you are a blessing to me ,am a new convert and am learning so much from your videos .
There is a jubilee /forgive all debts...nessara/gessara new currency by gold standard returned prophesy of Saint Germain for golden age
Bill written over winter solstice2018 by Trump...2 currencies
The pope preaches from the chair.
Howcome there’s no evidence for the existence of Jesus outside the bible?
(1) Where are you getting your data? Do Pliny, Tacitus, Josephus and Lucian not count for some reason? Are they off the table for some reason similar to why the New Testament is being removed?
(2) Do you ask the same of Pontius Pilate, for virtually the same list of references above for him exist for Jesus? If not, why not for Pontius and why for Jesus? I don't mean that in any type of snarky way -- I simply ask you to consider your motivation if you don't equally question Pilate's existence or any other figure in history for which there is equal or lesser attestations than that of Jesus? Simply because Jesus performed actions Pilate did not, for example, does not make the bar higher or lower for his historical existence to be affirmed or denied.
(3) I think what you may be asking for is some type of tome about Jesus outside of the New Testament or the Gospels, when those are certainly the most lengthy attestations to his existence. It's bizarre that some would ask to have the core data removed from the table of consideration (especially when the gospel writers tell you what their intention is in writing the gospels, and as such indicate the genre of their writing) and then ask for the data they just removed from consideration to be provided. Do keep in mind, moreover, that the New Testament is a compilation of multiple attestations to the existence of Jesus. It's not as if there is 1 human author to the books of the Bible or the New Testament specifically. Rather than seeing the Bible as a singular testament to the existence of Jesus, I fail to see why it's not seen as multiple affirmations to what you seek? Indeed, Paul, a murderer of Christians should close the case for you if you suspect the early persecuted Christians facebook messaged one another with the same story to act as a corroboration whilst concomitantly giving them the chutzpah to go out and die (or, at minimum, speak in Jesus' name in an environment that got others killed) for said story when they just didn't believe he never existed, but that they KNEW he didn't exist.
@@CatholicProductions , The thing is that there is no reliable data about Jesus. Pliny, Tacitus, Josephus and Lucian never met Jesus - they got the information about Jesus from the early christians. So the information was already biased.
Secondary occuerencies such as Herod's child killing and the new born star is also missing from the history books. Very suspisious.
It's not interesting whether Ponitus Pilates ever lived. He was no extraordinary person. Just a leader.
Christianity is most likely a version of the more sophisticated Essene sect (300 B.C. to 70 A.D.). According to Josephus, the Essenes were mostly pacifist, ascetic, celibate and had a 'great teacher'. Josephus actually met the Essens. But the authors of the new testament 'forgot' to mention the Essens together with the Pharisees and the Sadducees
.
Because you did not do your research.
the church???!!! just get alone, & try to talk to G-d 4 five minutes straight...
@@jenschristiansen9490 No they got most of their information from Roman records and Jewish authorities. There is more historical evidence for the existence of Jesus than there is for Socrates, Aristotle and Plato.