SUPREME COURT LANDMARK JUDGEMENT ON SECTION 148 (UOI vs RAJEEV BANSAL) BY ADV KAPIL GOEL JI-03/10/24

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 4

  • @KokilSahai
    @KokilSahai 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Why can't they write a simple judgement "HC is pointless, law be damned, revenue is always right, taxpayers are anti national/Pakistani"
    It will save assessees a lot of time & money

  • @harishkhetan4511
    @harishkhetan4511 9 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    Namaskaram…does it not mean when SC ruled that the judgement of the HC stands overruled to the extent of observation.. what I fail to understand is that the first step in any judgement is statement of facts by both sides then observation by any court and then finally the ruling…. does it not mean then that the entire order in a sense has to be set aside? Pl help me understand🙏🏻

  • @hasmukhlodha7995
    @hasmukhlodha7995 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Let's see what cbdt guide line will issue after this judgement.
    Now we have see what stand cbdt will take for for assment year 2016 17
    2017 18 for section 151 (ii)

  • @gamingtech174
    @gamingtech174 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Good Morning Sir,
    AY 2017-18
    Less than fifty lacs case
    Date of first notice - 28/06/2021
    Date of information - 21/05/2022
    Last date for reply - 06/06/2022
    Date of fresh notice under new regime - 12/07/2022
    Please share your valuable advice that case can be reopen or not ?