The trombonist plays different notes at 2:02. The score is wrong, I think. What is played makes more sense. In the score you have f, c, f. The trombonist plays f, c, b flat, which sounds right. I imagine that the solo part has it right and somehow the score got it wrong. Curious indeed.
It's funny, I'm playing as the soloist here in a few days, and the score itself is right, but most players just change it because it sounds a bit weird in context. SO technically the score is right.
No, f c f definitely makes sense composition-wise, but f c b flat sounds nicer because it resolves, ending on the tonic, which is why the soloist may have taken their own liberties with that. Ending on f, the fifth, would leave it unresolved, because it is not supposed to resolve yet, leading on to the following section.
I think he made this concerto the Italian way. It goes fast slow fast, and most baroque Italian concertos were around that length. Its on the simpler sound of orchestration (as in less instruments, not bad orchestration) unlike other concertos from around that time, which were basically just 3 movement symphonies. They could be good, but way too much orchestration for a concerto (in my opinion)
Played this concerto for a solo a bit back, such a fun piece.
I played that a long time ago
So nice!!
We are struggling finding this specific piece. They are out of stock everywhere.
The trombonist plays different notes at 2:02. The score is wrong, I think. What is played makes more sense. In the score you have f, c, f. The trombonist plays f, c, b flat, which sounds right. I imagine that the solo part has it right and somehow the score got it wrong. Curious indeed.
It's funny, I'm playing as the soloist here in a few days, and the score itself is right, but most players just change it because it sounds a bit weird in context. SO technically the score is right.
such an obvious misprint
No, f c f definitely makes sense composition-wise, but f c b flat sounds nicer because it resolves, ending on the tonic, which is why the soloist may have taken their own liberties with that. Ending on f, the fifth, would leave it unresolved, because it is not supposed to resolve yet, leading on to the following section.
Nice 👍
Cool
A short but nice concerto
I think he made this concerto the Italian way. It goes fast slow fast, and most baroque Italian concertos were around that length. Its on the simpler sound of orchestration (as in less instruments, not bad orchestration) unlike other concertos from around that time, which were basically just 3 movement symphonies. They could be good, but way too much orchestration for a concerto (in my opinion)
I'll graduate with this piece in 8 days
Congrats on graduating
@@idontcare158 thank u
Por acaso o senhor poderia me enviar esse arranjo?
What instrument would the part 'Corno Basso' be played on today? My immediate suggestion would be a euphonium.
maybe wagner tuba?