NIHRC - Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 19

  • @jordanhallson2324
    @jordanhallson2324 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Published over a year ago, but hardly any likes or conversation?
    That’s a rabbit hole all in its own!

    • @saskoilersfan
      @saskoilersfan 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I get it ..check it....
      Chicago's O' hare and the loop.... The rabbit hole.
      Maybe Oz did kill Kennedy...
      Maybe Os hides Oz..
      Maybe Kennedy's war of the worlds became war of the words with liars...
      Maybe . English is a language used by liars ..
      A language of lies...
      Can't ignore this possibility ..the language of lies called English...

  • @Anon-xd3cf
    @Anon-xd3cf 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This was all about religion.
    No mention of freedom of thought.
    No mention of freedom of conscious.

  • @homosapien.a6364
    @homosapien.a6364 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    We don't have that "the freedom of religion"
    In Saudi Arabia i'm an agnostic and i cant even talk about it 😭😭💔💔
    I hope someday the freedoms be in the whole world

    • @ristuksenvittu
      @ristuksenvittu 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      There is no true freedom of belief pretty much anywhere. Not even in finland.
      I believe cannabis(the plant) is a gift from god and is the plant of justice and truth. I believe using cannabis takes me closer to god but the laws in finland prohibit the use of cannabis and therefore i am being oppressed by my own country that i have sworn/made and oath for to fight for, in case of a war ever happening. How could a democratic nation treat its citizens like this?

  • @i.f1256
    @i.f1256 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    dignity

  • @giovanniurso5516
    @giovanniurso5516 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Quattordicesimooooo

  • @progress_reality
    @progress_reality 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    should not it be freedom to practice religion can be subjected to limits required by the law. grammafical error

  • @namelessperson2170
    @namelessperson2170 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    At first at the beginning freedom of religion is to worship JESUS without being prosecuted. Now all religion is been added to it and changed.

  • @talhamughal136
    @talhamughal136 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Qoq800pieces G ab hm

  • @nathanielberkeley-biggs2855
    @nathanielberkeley-biggs2855 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    But it doesn’t prevent people discriminating against others because their book says they can, and it doesn’t prevent people being prosecuted or killed for disobeying the rules of someone else’s religion or committing ‘blasphemy’
    This is good in principle, but in reality is clap trap because the goal posts are moved way to one side in many cases around religion.
    This mentions briefly that sometimes people need to make changes to their religion because of law, but it does not enforce this enough by saying that there is a standard law for everyone, and law is law, what you believe here according to your religion is not recognized under law, that’s a personal belief. law of the land supersedes anyone’s personal belief in what God wants them to do.
    The law should not recognise god, it should only allow you to believe in it if you want to, but this is. Or what we are seeing in reality.

    • @victoriawright7412
      @victoriawright7412 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      But it does descriminate against religious exemption against the vaccines. We are not free to choose what goes into our bodies that God created and said we should glorify Him with. That's my religious right and my conscience to choose, which the government's are violating. Hyppcritical.