Pierre Boulez - Incises {2001 version} (Audio + Score)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 มี.ค. 2022
  • Pierre Boulez - Incises, for piano (2001)
    Performed by Sébastien Vichard
    Incises (1994/2001) and Sur Incises (1996/1998) are two related works of the French composer Pierre Boulez. The pitches of the row used in Incises and Sur Incises are based on the Sacher hexachord, the same as those used in the rows for Répons, Messagesquisse, and Dérive 1.
    Incises ("Interpolations") for solo piano was composed in 1994 as a test piece for the Umberto Micheli Piano Competition, where it was first performed on 21 October 1994. Boulez revised it in 2001. Incises was Boulez's first work for solo piano since his Third Piano Sonata of 1955-57/63. The piece lasts less than ten minutes.
    The work plays with contrasts of gestures and textures, for instance, repeated pitches or chords in an even tempo interrupted by violent melodic arcs, or sparse chordal interjections without discernible rhythm over long held sonorities.
    Reviewing of a 2005 performance of Incises, Tim Page described it: "Incises is charged with a bright, cold, hard brilliance, like a spray of crushed ice. It is dense with events - even when it is silent for a moment, Boulez's music never really 'rests' - but also far more generous in its emotional expression than much of his earlier work."
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incises
    Join the Score Video Creator Discord Server:
    / discord
    PATREON - Pay a small monthly fee and gain access to my online score library, full of rare scores that I have used in videos - / ryanpower
    PAYPAL - Donations of any amount welcome! - www.paypal.com/paypalme/offic...

ความคิดเห็น • 42

  • @BetonBrutContemporary
    @BetonBrutContemporary 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    BEST BOULEZ PIANO PIECE

  • @MicoAquinoComposer
    @MicoAquinoComposer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Wonderful playing! I love this recording of Boulez's Incises! Thank you for uploading!

  • @yeetthebeet
    @yeetthebeet 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    great textures

  • @machida5114
    @machida5114 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    quite good...

  • @machida5114
    @machida5114 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    so good...

  • @OmarFernandesAly
    @OmarFernandesAly 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Bravo!

  • @user-yo1ke1dy2p
    @user-yo1ke1dy2p หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's interesting to see that the notation and style of 20-21 century music are gradually coming to their place. Rhythmic notation seems to be more free

  • @MrInterestingthings
    @MrInterestingthings 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Boulez truly kept exploring till the end . I can't even recognize Boulez in this music ! I'm amazed at how different this is from the early postWW2 works . Maybe because he allows the player more freedom it doesn't sound like Boulez all the time .I think I have missed to much of the music after structuesand Notation in the 5th minute I recognized much from Anthemes and Anthemes II in feel There is anxiety but more brightness ,more color a completely different type of humor here but it feels like a gadfly ,looser,freerer ,less dogmatic ,less rigid I prefer the earlier Boules ob the early 1950's and sounds too much like other composers -its profile is lighter, weaker? than that of the 2nd sonata . I have to see a works list and catch up !

    • @masem3156
      @masem3156 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Late Boulez is particularly consistent and amazing

  • @hernanpiro
    @hernanpiro ปีที่แล้ว

    3:06

  • @muslit
    @muslit ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The pitches matter in as much as they follow serial procedures. They aren't chosen for their color or freshness.

    • @Whatismusic123
      @Whatismusic123 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We don't recognize pitches, computers do. Sh*t like this is why modern composers and listeners are incompetent.

    • @muslit
      @muslit 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@Whatismusic123 You don't recognize pitches. I do.

    • @Whatismusic123
      @Whatismusic123 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@muslit actually yeah, I'm wrong, there exists Perfect Pitch and Relative Pitch, which I did not account for. However, those are entirely conscious operations, and I should have clarified my statement for it regarded unconscious perception of music.

    • @muslit
      @muslit 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Whatismusic123 Thanks. Anyway, harmony went to the wayside when composers avoided tonal harmony at all costs. It became boring, every pitch being equal. No one says listening to Incises "what great harmony". It's purely functional. The rest is gesture, rhythm and pacing.

    • @muslit
      @muslit 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Whatismusic123 Here's some interesting harmony (I think) th-cam.com/video/bQ9olIEsPMk/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=ContemporaryClassical

  • @huailiulin
    @huailiulin ปีที่แล้ว +2

    0:31 well it isn’t classical music

    • @bylokonnor
      @bylokonnor หลายเดือนก่อน

      What makes you say that?

  • @muslit
    @muslit ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The harmony is never varied, therefore it is dull.

    • @monsieurbrochant7528
      @monsieurbrochant7528 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      what harmony?

    • @robertnicolay8327
      @robertnicolay8327 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The melody is in the resonances, listen from the inside out.

    • @muslit
      @muslit 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I hear harmony in the resonances. Dull harmony. @@robertnicolay8327

    • @Caleb-yn9ko
      @Caleb-yn9ko 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The harmony is absolutely varied. Sure it’s based on a tone row, but the row unfolds differently each time so the intervals are never the same. That’s just serialism in a nutshell lol.

    • @Caleb-yn9ko
      @Caleb-yn9ko 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’m not gonna pretend I’ve analyzed this piece closely but I can hear variation though listening for it.

  • @Whatismusic123
    @Whatismusic123 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is not music.

    • @themobiusfunction
      @themobiusfunction 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      This person is a troll, just ignore them

  • @BrianJosephMorgan
    @BrianJosephMorgan หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bravo!