Mercedes T80 - The Impressive Engineering EXPLAINED

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 มี.ค. 2022
  • Let's have a closer look at the impressive project that brought German Car and Aircraft industry together: The Mercedes T80
    How did the project start?
    How did they structure and fund the project?
    Which engineering challenges did the engineers face?
    And which tricks and innovations do we see here for the first time before they were used in motorsport decades later?
    #Mercedes #Porsche #Volkswagen
    Crosswind Sensitivity EXPLAINED:
    • Crosswind Sensitivity ...
    Porsche's Lost Supercar: The Auto Union P52
    • AUTO UNION P52 (1934) ...
    Auto Union Grand Prix Car Evolution EXPLAINED:
    • Grand Prix Racing (F1)...
    Mercedes Grand Prix Car Evolution EXPLAINED:
    • Grand Prix Racing (F1)...
    Join this channel to get access to perks:
    / @bsport320
    Pictures:
    www.oldmachinepress.com
    www.spiegel.de
    www.bundesarchiv.de
    www.forum.warthunder.com
    www.flugrevue.de
    www.porsche.de
    www.elferspot.com

ความคิดเห็น • 285

  • @alexanderklenk2195
    @alexanderklenk2195 2 ปีที่แล้ว +955

    It's crazy to think about how much earlier race car aerodynamics could have advanced if it weren't for WW2

    • @stephencurry8552
      @stephencurry8552 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You mean were it not for germans who supported a deranged maniac.

    • @scootergeorge7089
      @scootergeorge7089 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      This car was designed before WWII.

    • @bradleycruse2763
      @bradleycruse2763 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      @@scootergeorge7089 he's saying that without ww3 aero on F1 cars etc would have developed earlier

    • @bradleycruse2763
      @bradleycruse2763 2 ปีที่แล้ว +130

      Generally though, WW2 developed aero understanding and funding

    • @scootergeorge7089
      @scootergeorge7089 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bradleycruse2763 - Other than some work by German engineers in swept wing technology, I don't see it.

  • @carwashadamcooper1538
    @carwashadamcooper1538 2 ปีที่แล้ว +660

    Purely analog, MECHANICAL traction control.
    In the 1930s.
    I would love to have the technical drawings for that system!

    • @bdykes7316
      @bdykes7316 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      The 2002 Honda CR-V has a mechanical/hydraulic system to engage the rear wheel drive when the front wheels are slipping. The part that compares wheel speeds is within the rear differential housing if you want to look it up.
      Edit: One hydraulic pump is geared to the drive shaft (front wheels) and a second hydraulic pump is geared to the rear differential. When one pump is spins faster than the other, a differential pressure is created that applies a hydraulic clutch pack that transmits torque to the rear wheels. The torque is proportional to the difference in front and rear speeds.
      The front and rear axles both have an open differential.

    • @earlwebster5351
      @earlwebster5351 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@bdykes7316 That is a viscous coupling within the driveline. I would like to know how Porsche compared speeds of driven and non-driven wheels.

    • @buddyrojek9417
      @buddyrojek9417 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@earlwebster5351 would be pressure driven . With a regulator valve . As a wheel spins it drives a pump that engages , disengages

    • @theroyalaustralian
      @theroyalaustralian ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bdykes7316 Huh, very interesting.

    • @est7720
      @est7720 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@earlwebster5351 isn’t that somewhat like VW awd?

  • @1.8T20V
    @1.8T20V 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    Seeing it at the Mercedes-Benz Museum in Stuttgart was quite shocking. its very large and looks a little uncanny, almost like it isn't man-made! A marvelous piece of Engineering

    • @Stamina1337
      @Stamina1337 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i feel the same. Just was there last week. Stunning thing.

  • @fan-tastic2803
    @fan-tastic2803 2 ปีที่แล้ว +231

    I’ve always thought the 30’s delivered some of the most avant- gard designs and brains. In most design aspects, from architecture to engineering.

    • @1DEADBEEF1
      @1DEADBEEF1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I love modernism architecture! Heck look at the fighter airplane the best fighters from 1931 were completly and absoutely outdated by 1939

    • @blacktoothfox677
      @blacktoothfox677 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The Golden Arrow is a special LSR car from the 30's... Visually prefiguring modern racecar designs by virtue of artisrty, physics, instinct.
      It's just up the road from me in Beaulieu, an incredible thing!

    • @Icetea-2000
      @Icetea-2000 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@1DEADBEEF1 Well same with fighters of 39 after the world war. It just felt like such a more exciting time in terms of technological advances, so much more happened in so much less time.
      If it weren’t for WW1 and the WW2 it inevitably doomed us for, we’d probably have been on Mars in the 20th century already

    • @Redh0und
      @Redh0und ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Icetea-2000 well it was ww1 and 2 that only pushed such incredible technological advancement. It was the cold war that ultimately put us on the moon.

    • @Icetea-2000
      @Icetea-2000 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Redh0und Yeah, I’ve been thinking about this too in the past, but in the end it’s all about competition. Sure, war definitely induces competition greatly, but that’s not the only way to have competition. And especially in World War 2, along with the progress it brought, so much progress was destroyed as well towards the end of the war with europe being bombed to the ground.
      The question is, for example would scientists in Germany in the 40s have come up with jet powered aircraft and harnessing nuclear power anyway or was it due to the war? Hard to say, and we can never know for sure. But there’s also no reason to assume scientists wouldn’t come to the same conclusions anyway, war or not. If they’re working on it, they’re working on it. There’s always a base level of competition due to the nature of the scientific environment.
      And the cold war wasn’t even a war, it was an arms race, another non-violent form of competition. It was Kennedy pushing scientists to work faster with his claim to put a man on the moon before the end of the decade, not a war. In fact, a war would definitely have halted such an endeavor.
      What would be interesting to know is whether we would be far more advanced if we would be in a constant war the last decade that isn’t total destruction but conventional. There’s obviously nowhere to know the alternatives because we can’t look in parallel universes, we can only see ours. But I doubt it, competition in research is always existent anyway.

  • @Noise-Bomb
    @Noise-Bomb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +99

    Man that steel tube underbody support is a work of art. With these beautiful sheet metal knot plates and sweeping bends. Craftsmanship was on a different level back then.

    • @raffriff42
      @raffriff42 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The skins were flat sheets of aluminum or steel, beaten with special hammers over a wooden form, or sometimes freestyled over sandbags. I can't even.

    • @jimrobcoyle
      @jimrobcoyle ปีที่แล้ว

      Coach work is still being done.
      youtube.com/@bespokecoachworks8919

  • @fischlimonade
    @fischlimonade 2 ปีที่แล้ว +97

    I really like how you don't just explain how modern race cars work but also interesting old ones

  • @RB26N
    @RB26N 2 ปีที่แล้ว +124

    hole hell , they reached 500+ km/h in 1930s ! that is insane engineering.
    Thank you for fantastic video yet again.

    • @raffriff42
      @raffriff42 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      _Would have_ reached, it never got off the dyno.

    • @melvinenglebright8125
      @melvinenglebright8125 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can lead the horse to the water trough but, you can't make him drink

    • @DolleHengst
      @DolleHengst ปีที่แล้ว +11

      ​@@raffriff42 in 1938 Rudolf Caracciola reached 432.7 km/h on a public road, with a streamlined Mercedes F1 car. It had a 5.5 litre V12 engine with only 726 hp.
      The T80 had a drag coefficient of 0.18 and over 3000 hp. Heavy as it was, 500 km/h was an absolute given. 600kmh was a question mark, but no utopia. It would depend on the wheels and tires holding up.

    • @nightstorm5914
      @nightstorm5914 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@DolleHengst and no strong winds at the test day or would crash like the car from Bernd Rosemeier (RIP)
      also the record from Caracciola stood unbroken for yearly 8 decades on public roads before it was broken 2017 on german roads again by a Koeniggsegg Agera S

    • @MrAndemob
      @MrAndemob ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@nightstorm5914 True - no winds would be preferred. Also: quite an achievement on public roads, even if it was an Agera RS that broke the record, in Nevada, USA, in november 2017 (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koenigsegg_Agera 😉)

  • @Paris__
    @Paris__ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    That T80 looks absolutely amazing.....half aircraft, half spaceship. What a piece of engineering in the 1930's. Mercedes-Benz have some back-catalogue! Unlike any other manufacturer in history!

  • @39PSIOnTheDaily
    @39PSIOnTheDaily 2 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    As a child, I had a Mercedes Benz book by Shirley Haines that featured the T80 on one of its pages. I remember staring at it for hours on end, thinking it was the coolest looking car ever made. I still think it’s one of the most beautiful cars ever conceived. It’s a shame it didn’t trial, but I admire everything it was made to do: Nothing screams “serious driver” more than piloting a car at its top speed.

    • @privatesgooglekonto7638
      @privatesgooglekonto7638 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      As a German I strongly disagree, no one but an American would say that

    • @39PSIOnTheDaily
      @39PSIOnTheDaily 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@privatesgooglekonto7638 I’m half Polish, quarter English and quarter French, and live in Canada, but thank you for your input. I look forward to all the clips you’ll upload of you piloting your T80 replica down the Autobahn at 700+km/h sustained.

  • @erikmann9861
    @erikmann9861 2 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    It is all incredible, both from scientific and artistic aspects (I was blown away by a 450HP+ short-wheelbase hotrod, so can only imagine something at this level). This brilliance seems to support the legend of German engineering. Might I suggest the phrasing, "the aerodynamics of the car were on another level". I apologize for being pedantic, but I was raised by two school teachers.

    • @BSport320
      @BSport320  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thanks!

    • @echo9082
      @echo9082 ปีที่แล้ว

      You seem young lmao

  • @mosca3289
    @mosca3289 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great to see analysis of this historical car.

  • @petermuller3995
    @petermuller3995 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Best Motorsport Channel on You Tube

  • @OliveiraX
    @OliveiraX 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Amazing. I didn't know that german auto makers Opel and Mercedes were already using wings for downforce in the 30's.... F1 only started to use wings in the late 60's!

    • @BSport320
      @BSport320  2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yes, Opel even in the 1920's. I will cover a bit more of wings in motorsport in future videos.

    • @thethirdman225
      @thethirdman225 ปีที่แล้ว

      They weren’t using them for racing.

  • @mbsilverarrow
    @mbsilverarrow 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Love the in depth description

  • @real.p.1
    @real.p.1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Wow, what an interesting video! So much still to learn about motorsport history. Thanks for helping this not getting lost in time! Best regards from Belgium.

    • @BSport320
      @BSport320  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Glad you enjoyed it!

  • @thomaswolff2662
    @thomaswolff2662 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Tolles Video. Bitte mehr von Vorkriegs Technik im Automobilbau. Abo + Like !

  • @joetoetjube
    @joetoetjube 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fantastic video!! Thank you

  • @jtveg
    @jtveg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks so much for sharing. 😉👌🏻

  • @basilb4733
    @basilb4733 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent research!

  • @test987665
    @test987665 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Really enjoy the historical engineering videos, keep them coming!

  • @OrdinaryLatvian
    @OrdinaryLatvian 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Thanks so much for this video! I love this era of racing. Pure unfiltered insanity.

  • @wernerschulte6245
    @wernerschulte6245 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Super erklärt, danke !

  • @mikedx2706
    @mikedx2706 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ingenious design and features for that Mercedes land speed record car.

  • @hahaha9076
    @hahaha9076 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Interesting to learn about Ferdinand Porsches history too.
    Thank you.

    • @thethirdman225
      @thethirdman225 ปีที่แล้ว

      You should read about his ‘other’ history…

  • @trance9158
    @trance9158 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Badass....love hearing mention of Porsche.

  • @ericbrammer2245
    @ericbrammer2245 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Wow. The Body Airflow was almost 2 decades ahead on this rig! Impressive!

  • @PPYTAO
    @PPYTAO ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Super interesting, thank you!

    • @BSport320
      @BSport320  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are welcome!

  • @gooo1762
    @gooo1762 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sick video. Thanks!

    • @BSport320
      @BSport320  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad you liked it!

  • @AR_434
    @AR_434 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastisch!

  • @chadissimusrex8038
    @chadissimusrex8038 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice video. I would not have minded if u'd have gone into the mechanical traction control or why an inverted V was never adopted in cars further.

  • @martinfisker7438
    @martinfisker7438 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That is some insane tech for the 1930s.
    Also loved the video, you just earned yourself a new sibscriber

    • @BSport320
      @BSport320  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Great, thank you and welcome!

  • @MrDino1953
    @MrDino1953 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Such a great narration voice and a very interesting story.

    • @BSport320
      @BSport320  ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad you enjoyed it!

  • @budgiefriend
    @budgiefriend ปีที่แล้ว +1

    excellent.

  • @rayprater5402
    @rayprater5402 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well made video

  • @user-tc6qo9uk1x
    @user-tc6qo9uk1x ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wonderful

  • @gafrers
    @gafrers 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Brilliant

  • @randompalmtopgaming7541
    @randompalmtopgaming7541 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Ooh this video is such gold.
    Really puts some perspective on technology of the late 30s..it was surprisingly qdvanced, and this car was absolutely on another level. What a shame it didn't run..

    • @PhantomWoIf
      @PhantomWoIf 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      it did run, 650Km/h on the autobahn, there are videos of it.

    • @kristene2372
      @kristene2372 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PhantomWoIf really, awesome. you have a link?

  • @Tsynique
    @Tsynique 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Very nice video and a great analysis about such a strange old machine. I hope we can see more videos like that about historical machines :)

    • @BSport320
      @BSport320  2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      More to come!

    • @Tsynique
      @Tsynique 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@BSport320 Niiiiice!

  • @marioelburro1492
    @marioelburro1492 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thats just insane to think about the knowledge they already had back then on aerodynamic and crazy big engine manufacturing

  • @flizndfor
    @flizndfor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Super interessant! 👌🏻 Gerne mehr aus der Zeit. Als Kontrast zum Thema Top Speed wären auch die aktuellen Fahrzeuge von Koenigsegg, SSC etc. sehr interessant! 😬

  • @ImInLoveWithBulla
    @ImInLoveWithBulla ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It’s amazing how speed record cars hit a wall so early and never really made any huge breakthrough since. Sure, they got faster, but not by massive leaps and bounds. Once they figured out that tuna=fast, it was impossible to make something much better than what nature had already designed.

    • @TinyBearTim
      @TinyBearTim 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If your talking about cars with engines they advanced but there is little to no reason to make a homologation special like these anymore people are more interested in fasted road car and fast car (rocket/jet engine)

  • @marchellochiovelli7259
    @marchellochiovelli7259 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Pretty amazing it wasn't trashed during the war. This some study in aerodynamics.

  • @charliemolda297
    @charliemolda297 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I know you are more aerodynamically inclined, but I would have appreciated a brief explanation of why the A engine was chosen by Mercedes for the planes over a V type engine.
    Otherwise I loved the video, thank you for the interesting and quality videos as always!

    • @BSport320
      @BSport320  2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Thanks, good point but I wanted this to be about the T80. A and V engines is enough stuff for another video.

    • @charliemolda297
      @charliemolda297 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@BSport320 That is more than fair enough. Thank you for your reply and thanks for always putting out interesting content

    • @user-om9gy3mg7x
      @user-om9gy3mg7x 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      There are many theories and hypothesis about the upside down V engine.
      The more plausible one is that this is easier for maintenance.
      The most complicated part, the engine head is the lowest part of the engine and the maintenance crews won't have to climb to the top of the plane to fix the engine.
      The other hypothesis is that it's better for packaging and visibility.
      The narrow crank case allows the engineers to put machine guns besides it.
      BF109 has two machine guns in the nose.
      V12 engine is really long and it blocks the view of the pilot when take off or landing.
      The narrow nose has a little bit more visibility than conventional V engine.

    • @charliemolda297
      @charliemolda297 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@user-om9gy3mg7x That's quite interesting, I didn't know about any of this. Thanks!

    • @user-om9gy3mg7x
      @user-om9gy3mg7x 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@charliemolda297 You're welcome
      These videos have more in depth explanation.
      You can check it out.
      th-cam.com/video/H1YLwRQLB_I/w-d-xo.html
      th-cam.com/video/e7R39tJ7psw/w-d-xo.html

  • @Andrew-vx2ls
    @Andrew-vx2ls 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Now we know where the idea for the stubby side wings of the W13 come from!
    The inverted V engine is interesting, perhaps today's Ilmor V6 could be inverted to hoover up air from under the car...

  • @joshuaquinones9760
    @joshuaquinones9760 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    That's the one featured in Cars On The Road 😮

  • @oht_zz
    @oht_zz 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    it’s crazy how much we improved like now we have a medium sized engine that goes 500kmh but back than they had to use 2 massive engines just to reach 400 or 500 kmh

  • @lolshark99b49
    @lolshark99b49 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The mechanical traction control!

  • @igorbarbarossa
    @igorbarbarossa ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can someone tell me what is the car at 2:10 in the lower left corner

  • @Djeseret
    @Djeseret 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Yes, but wings on cars were not widely used at the time, it was Opel who invented the idea and Mercedes was number two to use it.
    Opel's wings were also adjustable from the inside of the car while driving, while Mercedes are fixed.
    Opel also used an electric accelerator pedal in the rocket cars in 1928.
    In the end of the 1960s, the wings returned to racing cars and then to ordinary standard cars after a racing driver had seen pictures of the Opel Rocket Cars.
    However, Opel then discovered on its third rocket car that the wings should sit in the front of the car - as on an F1 car - and not in the middle, this knowledge has apparently not been perceived by Mercedes.

    • @BSport320
      @BSport320  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Very true and this will be part of a future video about the history of wings.

    • @TheLtVoss
      @TheLtVoss 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@BSport320 well looking at the drawing of the T80 and its aerodynamic features I would say don't pusch it that car is a death trap with that aerodynamic balance it will get air born for a short time before landing on the roof without the diffuser the car wold have a okish balace of down force because the wings ar 50/50 front and rear downforce so they don't press the front down but the back has a huge diffuser behind the wheels not between them that increases the leverage and at the speeds they wanted to crack it Shurly cold lift the front a bit caching the air flow under it .. Mhm and now I'm wondering how the mechanic traction control would behave in that situation

    • @raffriff42
      @raffriff42 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Opel cars had a center of thrust behind both center of gravity and center of pressure. Only a matter of time until they killed someone.

  • @BS-xh9wm
    @BS-xh9wm 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    showing us childhood pictures like wasn't 12 years old 4 years ago.

  • @PrinzAquatic
    @PrinzAquatic 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you cover gran Turismo vision gt cars? They gave ridiculous aero setup thats definitely not normal by today standard, im curious how an expert like you think of those aero setup.

  • @john1703
    @john1703 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Would have been interesting to see if exiting the radiator air downwards would have worked and not caused too much lift. Cobb's Railton Special used ice to cool the Napier Lion Aero-engines and no radiators, thus reducing drag.

    • @jareknowak8712
      @jareknowak8712 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The use of ice is still popular in Bonneville speed record cars to this day.

    • @kristene2372
      @kristene2372 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Mercedes/auto union already used ice to cool the engine in 1930's

  • @Pandamasque
    @Pandamasque 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you do a video on kammtail vs teardrop/rounded aero concepts in '60s cars?

    • @BSport320
      @BSport320  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, that's on my list already but it was a few decades earlier.

  • @floodo1
    @floodo1 ปีที่แล้ว

    really well done, thx.
    Is that a monocoque for the driver? looks like sheetmetal and tube frame to me, hard to tell tho

    • @BSport320
      @BSport320  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes the driver was in a Aluminium tub

  • @WE-R-EVERYWHERE
    @WE-R-EVERYWHERE 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is the engine sound in the intro the V16 brm f1 car?

  • @lorenzocavallaro8534
    @lorenzocavallaro8534 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about the two different compression ratios?

  • @ryota7483
    @ryota7483 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love mercedes T80

  • @collateral__damage
    @collateral__damage ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For being a 1930s project
    This is a surprisingly impressive car.....
    It still is to this day
    And it scares me how Germans
    Over engineer stuff

  • @martinfreund6737
    @martinfreund6737 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Will you do an analysis on the new Bykolles PMC Hypercar?

    • @BSport320
      @BSport320  2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Already on my list :)

  • @scootergeorge7089
    @scootergeorge7089 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks fast. Except for the drag inducing wing...

  • @letsbehonest3446
    @letsbehonest3446 ปีที่แล้ว

    And all this with the your german accent. Einfach herrlich.

    • @BSport320
      @BSport320  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Engineering needs to be explained with German accent 😅

  • @BarryHWhite
    @BarryHWhite ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is that a couple of Saltire's on your sheild/coat of arms?.
    What's there significance?.

    • @BarryHWhite
      @BarryHWhite ปีที่แล้ว +1

      To anybody interested.
      The channel owner, although sounding German, I suspect has Scottish genes since I found out the name of the channel has thy Scots surname of Buchan.

  • @digbysaunders73
    @digbysaunders73 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s the DB603 engine turbocharged??

  • @PhantomWoIf
    @PhantomWoIf 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    this thing has run 650Km/h on the autobahn in 1938. mercedes has the original in their vault, including the transmission and all, they build an exact copy of the T80 too. i think it would be great if mercedes produces the T80, that would be the fastest production car.

    • @39PSIOnTheDaily
      @39PSIOnTheDaily 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The T80 was never driven at speed.

    • @jareknowak8712
      @jareknowak8712 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not a "production car".

    • @PhantomWoIf
      @PhantomWoIf ปีที่แล้ว

      @@39PSIOnTheDaily ... which is a lie after you deleted the videoproof of it.

    • @39PSIOnTheDaily
      @39PSIOnTheDaily ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PhantomWoIf Huh?

  • @MarkStillPlays
    @MarkStillPlays ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i know im a year late but this literally looks like something you would see in a ksp minimal weight to (planet here) video

  • @YupThisIsFico
    @YupThisIsFico 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are you gonna make a video about the Bykolles Hypercar after they finally showed the real car?

    • @BSport320
      @BSport320  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      yes, working on it!

  • @mariusmabusel5452
    @mariusmabusel5452 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Saw the t80 last week in the Mercedes Benz museum such a masterpiece it’s so sad that it just hangs on a wall after you finished tour and is not displayed properly

    • @mctavish199
      @mctavish199 ปีที่แล้ว

      What more do you want? Did you somehow miss the body-off chassis? After you finished tour? What are you talking about?

  • @nickysixx2480
    @nickysixx2480 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dude the drag coefficient was 0.18. That is an amazing feat of engineering especially since the technology is nearly 90 years old! Yes the nazis were evil but the engineering marvel of that era was astonishing

  • @texasfathead
    @texasfathead ปีที่แล้ว

    🤠

  • @jourwalis-8875
    @jourwalis-8875 ปีที่แล้ว

    What type of tyres could cope with over 400 km/h in the 30s! Unbelivable!

    • @BSport320
      @BSport320  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      German Grand Prix cars often used Continental race tyres. And speeds of around 400km/h were not too unusual. E.g. if we look back at the 1937 AVUS race or the annual record weeks before the Grand Prix season started.

  • @The_ZeroLine
    @The_ZeroLine 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And everything ended happily ever after.

  • @thomaskrausse4767
    @thomaskrausse4767 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Man sagte damals wie heute nicht "new German highway". Das heisst "Autobahn". Anglizismen mag ich nicht.

  • @ISupportIsraelForever
    @ISupportIsraelForever ปีที่แล้ว

    Never seen 'grumpy racing' 😂😂

  • @kevinwatts1842
    @kevinwatts1842 ปีที่แล้ว

    You did tell us how fast it actually went in the end

    • @mctavish199
      @mctavish199 ปีที่แล้ว

      Perhaps because it never ran? Slight interruption caused by WW2.

  • @stijnvandamme76
    @stijnvandamme76 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    fastest Porsche of its days and I think still is

  • @theroyalaustralian
    @theroyalaustralian 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The DB-601 all the way to the DB-603A are not A engines according to history.
    The DB series of engines are Turbo Supercharged inverted V12's

  • @tkpenalty
    @tkpenalty 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Interesting how downforce as a concept wasn't explored more immediately after the post-war period.

    • @mctavish199
      @mctavish199 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because no one knew about downforce much less how to exploit it? Either passively with wings or actively like the Chapparal.

  • @Xayuap
    @Xayuap 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    ¿maybe a Λambda engine?

  • @volkerleiste6191
    @volkerleiste6191 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Die grosse Frage ist die areodynamische Stabilität des T80. Wäre er fahrstabil gewesen oder hätte er "abgehoben"?

  • @davidelliott5843
    @davidelliott5843 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Today's record breaking cars have solid wheels because rubber tyres (even today), will not safely go over 300mph.

  • @Sassenhaim
    @Sassenhaim วันที่ผ่านมา

    Every part of this technology made ot possible for Germany to make a war effort.
    The Db603 is a beast of a warbird engine😂

  • @anidiotinaracingcar4874
    @anidiotinaracingcar4874 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What speed did it achieve, then?

    • @las3k91
      @las3k91 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      none, The Germans were busy tearing Europe apart with tanks

  • @stereolababy
    @stereolababy ปีที่แล้ว +1

    spoke wheels....think about that

  • @Arsenic71
    @Arsenic71 ปีที่แล้ว

    Who would have thought, the batmobile originated in Germany!

  • @kidpagronprimsank05
    @kidpagronprimsank05 ปีที่แล้ว

    Using same engine powered many bombers, and fighters during the war; DB 603

  • @Company-59
    @Company-59 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this wonderful journey into the past. And it is really interesting, that, given everything the Third Reich had, without it, technical development would have been so much more advanced at that time and, today.

    • @BSport320
      @BSport320  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad you enjoyed it!

  • @jkoysza1
    @jkoysza1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    One wonders why a 3500hp A 12 motor didn’t find its way into an aircraft. Possibly concerns about durability?

    • @wowdanalise
      @wowdanalise 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It did. There was a great shortage of the engines so fewer of them made it into the air.

  • @mercoid
    @mercoid ปีที่แล้ว

    Moo moo po po go fast

  • @idunno1684
    @idunno1684 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    so if it ran, what was it theoretically capable of ??

    • @BSport320
      @BSport320  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I think only the people involved really know, but as we learned the deformations of the spoke rims limited the speed to around 500km/h. But that's nothing that couldn't have been solved with some more development time.

  • @jebise1126
    @jebise1126 ปีที่แล้ว

    calling it a instead of inverted v.... thats new... but ok it makes sense. but... what if real A was engine with a cylinder head and 2 pistons and 2 crankshafts... hmmm...

  • @Kualinar
    @Kualinar ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That car was about 40 years ahead of it's time. It have some ground effect. It have wings to keep it on the ground. It have traction control.

  • @randolphtorres4172
    @randolphtorres4172 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANKS4GIVING

  • @lowkeymodzz
    @lowkeymodzz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Blows my mind that it took about 60 years to build something that would even get to half of these speeds again. What happened to the engineers paperwork/files? Maybe theyre saving them to continue to money grab from consumers and have something new every 4 years to sell.

  • @311superfly
    @311superfly 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If you watched this your 155 mph Audi a8 might need a little love.❤

  • @Mikael-h2j
    @Mikael-h2j 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    As crianças do supra Toyota mk4 calaram a boca ☠

  • @theroyalaustralian
    @theroyalaustralian 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    In today's day and age so to speak, we don't refer inverted engines as A engines, we call them inverted V engines, the fine example of which you have showed when it comes to the Bf-109

    • @robambrose4199
      @robambrose4199 ปีที่แล้ว

      Here in Australia we call the V engines inverted A engines though.

    • @theroyalaustralian
      @theroyalaustralian ปีที่แล้ว

      @@robambrose4199 Straight up troll there.
      Ignoring.

    • @TheOneandOnlyGodHydra
      @TheOneandOnlyGodHydra ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Here we call that comment a "joke" lol

    • @theroyalaustralian
      @theroyalaustralian ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheOneandOnlyGodHydra One that I of all people interpret differently to the rest.

    • @robambrose4199
      @robambrose4199 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheOneandOnlyGodHydra Thank-you, it was a joke. I've never even been to Australia - whoosh,

  • @djcb4190
    @djcb4190 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What you want, so I become wgat you want.

  • @stijnvandamme76
    @stijnvandamme76 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    an A engine?? its called in inverted V.

  • @yallowrosa
    @yallowrosa ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You don't explain why the T80 never ran ...

  • @stevesloan6775
    @stevesloan6775 ปีที่แล้ว

    anticlimax! HAHAHAH